Tag Archives: america

Schultz Steamed Beck ‘Allowed’ On Airwaves

Jonah Goldberg might want to file this one away for his sequel to Liberal Fascism . . . On his MSNBC show this evening, Ed Schultz sputtered that it’s “pathetic” that Glenn Beck is “on the airwaves in this country” and “allowed” to express his opposition to public schools and support for home-schooling and vouchers. Schultz aired a clip in which Beck had this to say . . . GLENN BECK: The problem in America is we’re being indoctrinated from dawn until dusk, every single day, seven days a week. We’re being indoctrinated by Washington, we’re being indoctrinated by our unions, we’re being indoctrinated in our schools, we’re being indoctrinated in the media. We’re being indoctrinated!  What are you even talking about? You’re darn right we should abolish public schools. Here’s Schultz, in the course of commenting . . . ED SCHULTZ: This guy’s dangerous!  He’s a huge supporter of home-schooling and private-school vouchers. And this is an admission that he really does want two Americas. And I think it’s pathetic that somebody’s on the airwaves in this country that’s allowed to say this kind of garbage. It’s against the foundation of this country and everything that this country has stood for when it comes to opportunity in education. And he wants to take that away? Say Ed, why not advocate the establishment, say, of the House Un-American Media Activities Committee? How about a new Obama czar, empowered to determine which pundits are permitted on the air, and what they’re “allowed” to say?  

Link:
Schultz Steamed Beck ‘Allowed’ On Airwaves

Robert Redford Blames Cheney for America’s ‘Failed Energy Policy’

Actor Robert Redford lambasted America’s energy plan that he claimed led to the Gulf disaster, laying the responsibility at the feet of former Vice President Cheney. Appearing Monday night on “Anderson Cooper 360,” Redford blamed the Gulf oil spill not only on BP, but also because of the “failed” energy policy that led to this disaster. ‘There’s a lot being said about BP, and there’s a lot of truth that’s finally bubbling up to the surface,” Redford acknowledged. “But what I’m more interested in is – is looking at it from a historical point of view and trying to connect some dots about how we got here.” “Look, I think one of the reasons we’re in this problem is because we have not only a failed energy policy, but we have an energy policy – because of the way it was designed, and who it was designed by, Cheney – it’s sick and it’s dangerous.” Redford, who supports Obama’s drilling moratorium,  mandated that America must shed its current energy policy and adopt a new one. He rebuked the present policy as an unholy alliance of sorts between Congress, the government, and Big Oil. He gave the example of the US Minerals Management Service (MMS) as an example of a government agency that was asleep at the wheel in its oversight of oil companies. “Look, all that stuff has come out, and it’s painfully obvious what’s happened – the corruption that came with MMS as a result of Dick Cheney and how he engineered this whole thing,” he maintained. Redford’s solution? Get rid of former Vice President Dick Cheney – who’s been a private citizen for 17 months now – and his cronies. “You’ve got to get rid of Cheney and every – and all the horses he came in with. You’ve got to get rid of his energy policy. It’s bad for our health. It’s bad for our economy. It’s bad for our future.” A transcript of Anderson Cooper’s interview with Robert Redford, which aired on June 21, at 10:22 p.m. EDT, is as follows: ANDERSON COOPER, host: As you look at BP’s response to this spill, what stands out? I mean — I think, for a lot of people on the ground here, it’s the lack of transparency that we have seen. What surprises you about the way BP has handled this so far? ROBERT REDFORD: Nothing. What I’m kind of interested in here is, you know, there’s a lot being said about BP, and there’s a lot of truth that’s finally bubbling up to the surface. But what I’m more interested in is — is looking at it from a historical point of view and trying to connect some dots about how we got here. And, you know, when you stop and think about BP’s promises and the consequence of the collusion between government, Congress and big oil companies, what you get is what we’ve got: a failed energy policy — a terrible energy policy — that allowed this to happen. And so, I think, I’m interested in seeing if we can get to the public, connect the dots as to how we got here because we — there have been other disasters despite what they’re saying that have happened. COOPER: It’s interesting because — I mean, Senate Republicans told the President last week, look, focus on the oil spill right now, not on an energy bill. They say the President can’t afford any distractions until this is under control. You say the opposite. You say this is the time to focus on an energy bill. REDFORD: Look, I think one of the reasons we’re in this problem is because we have not only a failed energy policy, but we have an energy policy — because of the way it was designed by who it was designed by, Cheney — it’s sick and it’s dangerous. And any energy policy that’s designed behind closed doors with oil, gas and coal companies is bound to end up being a disaster of some sort. So, I think, we need a new energy policy. And I don’t think it’s next week, or next year or even — it’s now. If we miss this opportunity, we’re missing an incredible opportunity. And history will probably tell us that. So, get rid of this energy policy. It’s a disaster. COOPER: Do you think President Obama has shown leadership in that direction? I mean, he talked — he didn’t really give any details last week about what he wants to see in an energy bill. Were you satisfied with what you heard? Or were you looking for more specifics? REDFORD: No, I wasn’t satisfied with what I heard. I’m somewhat sympathetic to what the guy’s dealing with because he had all these other issues that were paramount when this thing came forward. And I don’t think he or the administration was quite prepared. Nor do I think BP was prepared. Nobody was prepared. I think he’s trying to do the best he can, but I think he’s got to do more. And I think if he thinks that he’s going to push something through with any kind of bipartisanship, I think it should be clear by now that there’s so many voices coming at him from the other side — the voices that, for me, is coming out of the Ice Age, you know, that he should forget about that. He better grab this moment. And I think the public is going to have to push him to push Congress. But he better push them. COOPER: Obviously, around here, the drilling moratorium, the deepwater drilling moratorium is hugely unpopular. There are a lot of jobs at stake here, there’s people suing in courts to try to get this thing overturned — although that seems unlikely to happen. We’ll have a ruling probably by tomorrow. You, obviously, I’m guessing, support the moratorium. Why? REDFORD: Well, I support the moratorium, because I think there’s so many disasters that have occurred in the past when we’ve been lied to about the fact that they would not happen. They have happened. Why have they happened? Because of the collusion between government, Congress and the big oil companies. So, I think — look, we’re not going to get rid of oil. I mean, we should accept that. I accept it. I worked in an oilfield as a kid. But I think what we’re asking for now is a new energy policy. And I think that — I’m totally sympathetic to the people in the Gulf who have lost their jobs, their way of life, environmental devastation and so forth. I understand the voices that want to not have a moratorium because they think it’s going to help jobs. But I think the first thing that should happen is that we have got to figure out — first of all, make sure BP pays every dime that’s owed to these people. My heart goes out to the people on the Gulf. And they need to be paid. And Obama has to push them to do it. Second, we’ve got to figure out how it happened. Why did this happen when we were told over and over again it wouldn’t happen? COOPER: And in terms of oversight by the government — I mean, clearly, the government, both under the Bush administration and even under the Obama administration, have not done as much in terms of reforming MMS. I mean, MMS, which has now been renamed today, has essentially, you know, been kind of a lap dog. REDFORD: It has. Look, all that stuff has come out, and it’s painfully obvious what’s happened — the corruption that came with MMS as a result of Dick Cheney and how he engineered this whole thing. You got to get rid of Cheney and every — and all the horses he came in with. You got to get rid of his energy policy. It’s bad for our health. It’s bad for our economy. It’s bad for our future. And I think the administration has to step up, get tough, get quick, and be very clear about what they’re prescribing. I think they have to be very clear about why there should be some moratorium, like should Shell be allowed to drill up in the Alaskan refuge? No, not yet. We got to get some facts in order first. COOPER: Robert Redford, I appreciate your time tonight. Thank you. REDFORD: You’re welcome.

Visit link:
Robert Redford Blames Cheney for America’s ‘Failed Energy Policy’

’80s Singer Kim Wilde: ‘Memba Her?

Filed under: Kim Wilde , Memba Them British singer Kim Wilde became famous in the ’80s for hits like ” Kids in America ” and ” You Keep Me Hangin’ On .” Guess what she looks like now! Read more

View original post here:
’80s Singer Kim Wilde: ‘Memba Her?

US town votes on plan to ban foreigners renting homes or having jobs

A Nebraska town, angry over a surge in the number of Hispanic residents, is voting today in a referendum on a new law that would require foreign nationals to get a licence to live in the town. The referendum in Fremont has been prompted by a sharp rise in Hispanic people drawn by work at local meatpacking plants combined with fears over job losses and demand placed on the town's social services because of the economic downturn. If approved, tenants who are not US-citizens would be required to get an “occupancy licence” from the city council. Even residents of nursing homes would be required to obtain such a licence. Federal law requires employers to verify the immigration status of workers but the proposed Fremont law would also open violators to local sanctions. Supporters insist it is not racist and is essential to protect jobs, healthcare and education for local people because the town's Hispanic population has surged from 165 to more than 2,000 in the past 20 years. It is unclear what proportion of those are in the US illegally but the big meatpacking plants where many work say they only employ people whose immigrant status has been verified. The Fremont Tribune has reported cases of Hispanic people, who are legal residents, being verbally abused and told to return to Mexico. Jerry Hart, one of the three sponsors of the legislation, told the Fremont Tribune that the proposed law is in part a security measure. “The federal law was put into place for a reason – to control how many people come into this country and to regulate the people, so they don't have communicable diseases and are not bringing in drugs or having criminal records and these people who are sneaking in – you don't know what you're getting. We could have terrorists and gang members and people involved in drugs,” he said. John Wiegert, another of the sponsors of the referendum, said: “A lot of them are coming here for the American dream and they're causing nothing but an American nightmare to me.” Nebraska Governor Dave Heineman has declined to take a position even though he is a former Fremont city councillor and owns and rents out property in the city. Some business owners oppose the measure, claiming Hispanic residents bring money to the town and are concerned at the cost to taxpayers of legal challenges by civil liberties groups. The American Civil Liberties Union is suing the state of Nevada over a proposed referendum to introduce tough immigration laws – similar to the controversial measures in force in Arizona – which require police to detain anyone they reasonably suspect to be in the US illegally. The proposed Nevada law would require non-US citizens to carry proof they have the right to be in the US and make it illegal to transport or house undocumented immigrants, among other measures. The ACLU and the Nevada Open for Business Coalition, a mix of casino owners, shopkeepers, unions and civic groups, on Friday asked a court to block the vote on the grounds it would promote racial profiling and hurt the state's economy.”Not only does the intent of the proposal blatantly violate America's most fundamental values of fairness and equality, the expansive scope of it intentionally confuses voters,” said the ACLU's lawyer, Maggie McLetchie. The proposed Nevada law has run in to objections from some in the business communityconcerned at the economic impact of Arizona's anti-illegal immigrant legislation on the state. The controversial law has led to boycotts of Arizona by some organisations, costing the state part of its lucrative convention business as well as affecting tourism. Towns near the Mexican border also report a sharp drop in the number of customers from Mexico. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/jun/21/us-town-licence-foreign-nationals added by: emarston

MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow Dismisses ‘Fake’ ‘Platitudes’ of Conservative Mount Vernon Statement

Liberal MSNBC host Rachel Maddow on Monday mocked the Mount Vernon Statement, a conservative declaration of principles as ” a grandiose fake-parchmenty-looking thing .” The anchor first described the document as endorsing “the rule of law, and individual liberty, and opposing tyranny in the world, and the defense of family, neighborhood, community and faith.” [Audio available here .] Maddow then dismissed, “In other words, such generic ‘I love my mama’ platitudes that even a pinko-Commie-liberal-elite-infidel like me would be happy signing on to all but one paragraph of the whole Mount Vernon Statement.” (At one point, Maddow appeared to be mimicking the tone and voice of the late William F. Buckley.) The left-wing host didn’t explain which paragraph she objected to, perhaps it was the one about “limited government” or “market solutions.” However, if it has caught the ire of MSNBC, conservatives might want to learn more about it. To view the entire document, go here . To see prominent conservatives, including MRC President Brent Bozell, read the Mount Vernon Statement, see a previous NewsBusters blog. A transcript of the segment, which aired at 9:05pm EDT on June 21, follows: RACHEL MADDOW: Republicans have made a bunch of efforts in the last year to nail down exactly what it is they want to tell the American people they stand for. Remember the pizza party that Eric Cantor and Mitt Romney hosted last year? That was supposed to be the kickoff for the Republican Party`s new National Council for a New America. The plan was for Republicans to travel around the country, soliciting ideas from average Americans. Eric Cantor pulled the plug on that big idea last month after holding just one pizza event in the whole year, one little pizza party. And then there was this idea-soliciting effort from House Republicans – Americaspeakingout.com, an online forum for Americans to provide new ideas for the Republican Party platform. As the Associated Press noted this weekend, that effort is also not bearing much fruit for Republicans. If you go to the “Liberty and Freedom” page, for example, right now, you can see that the top suggested ideas are “Please protect my right to play poker,” and “Eliminate `don`t ask, don`t tell.`” Also, “Keep the Republicans out of our bedrooms” and “Ban handguns” and “Drop the idea that we`re a Christian country.” You think the Republican Party is ready to run with those ideas? From Americaspeakingout.com, their big ideas generator? Then there was You Cut, the House Republican project to let the American people literally set the legislative agenda for Republicans. People would vote online on what federal spending programs should be cut, and then House Republicans would propose those cuts, thereby slashing federal spending by 0.017 percent. The anti-spending Cato Institute here ridiculing House Republican for their effort to exchange their own initiative, their own leadership, for a meaningless social media gimmick. Then there was the Mount Vernon Statement, a grandiose fake-parchmenty-looking thing that conservatives signed on to as their statement of Constitutional conservatism for the 21st century, endorsing things like the rule of law, and individual liberty, and opposing tyranny in the world, and the defense of family, neighborhood, community and faith. In other words, such generic “I love my mama” platitudes that even a pinko-Commie-liberal-elite-infidel like me would be happy signing on to all but one paragraph of the whole Mount Vernon Statement. And if I fit into your definition of conservative, your definition of conservative is probably broken. It`s one thing to have the luxury to work out your principles in the abstract, to have your pizza parties and your parchmenty statements that talk about loving America and hating foreign aid or whatever. It`s all well and good until what you want government to do actually gets put to the test, like say when a giant, totally unforeseen catastrophe happens, like what is happening right now in the Gulf — the biggest environmental disaster ever in our country, plainly and inarguably caused by an oil company screwing up. It`s exposed deep rifts and deep disagreements among conservatives, among Republicans, about what to do and why.

Read more here:
MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow Dismisses ‘Fake’ ‘Platitudes’ of Conservative Mount Vernon Statement

Adrianne Curry Continues to Try To Get More Twitter Followers of the Day

I hate this very Brady latch on cunt. I don’t think she’s hot. I don’t like her body. I am not impressed with her fake tits or her 5 minutes of fame she had back when reality TV first started polluting our lives making her one of the first official bottom feeding attention whore cunts…. Well the world forgot about her, cuz her existence is insignificant and she never had an actual career, so she’s taken to posting her sloppy America’s Next Top Model body, 15 season’s too late, cuz I guess photoshoots didn’t come with that title so she’s had to do it herself…all trying to get twitter followers…cuz she’s hopin’ this will give her a second chance to humilate herself and embarrass herself to a nation for little return. She’s fucking garbage….and she knows it and has gone so far as trying to tell me off and she blocking me on twitter months ago cuz she doesn’t like hearing the truth. Here are those desperate pics for a desperate and ugly pussy….it is safe to say a sex tape is coming…but I never understand why the sex tape never comes at the time it should …but always comes a decade too late….and who really fuckin cares…

View original post here:
Adrianne Curry Continues to Try To Get More Twitter Followers of the Day

ABC’s Tapper: A ‘Good Week’ for White House After ‘Gift’ From Joe Barton

On Friday’s Good Morning America on ABC, White House correspondent Jake Tapper described  White House reaction to Republican Congressman Joe Barton calling BP’s $20 billion escrow fund the result of a government “shakedown”: “…the argument they’re making, that the Republican Party is too close to corporate America…..And they’ve been given this great foil by Joe Barton.” When co-host George Stephanopoulos wondered if the Obama administration was at all concerned about being seen as anti-business, Tapper recited the White House spin: “…they say, at the end of the day, there were inequities throughout the Bush years and they need to correct those inequities. It was the wild west. And they’d rather be on their side, taking on corporate America, than on the Republican side, in their view, defending it.” Later, Tapper concluded: “…they think it was a good week. The President’s trip down to the Gulf, the speech, the $20 billion escrow fund and then this gift from Joe Barton ….they feel like they had a good week. Perhaps their first good week since this crisis began.” At the top of the show, co-host Robin Roberts described the “political firestorm” surrounding BP CEO Tony Hayward’s Thursday testimony on Capitol Hill and Barton’s comments. Later, Stephanopoulos argued that the “beating” Hayward got by members of Congress was “overwhelmed” by Barton. In a report that followed, correspondent Jonathan Karl declared: “Hayward did find one friend on Capitol Hill, Republican Joe Barton.” Turning to Tapper, Stephanopoulos began by noting how Democrats “pounced” on Barton. Tapper quoted a tweet from White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs: “He said, ‘Who would the GOP put in charge of overseeing the energy industry and big oil if they won control of Congress? Yup. You guessed it, Joe Barton.'” Here is a full transcript of the June 18 Stephanopoulos and Tapper exchange: 7:08AM ET GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: Let’s go to Jake Tapper at the White House. And Jake, they just pounced yesterday when they heard that apology. JAKE TAPPER: That’s exactly right. Vice President Biden made comments. And then take a look at this tweet from White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs. He said, ‘Who would the GOP put in charge of overseeing the energy industry and big oil if they won control of Congress? Yup. You guessed it, Joe Barton.’ And that’s the argument they’re making, that the Republican Party is too close to corporate America, corporations throughout the world, like BP. And they’ve been given this great foil by Joe Barton. STEPHANOPOULOS: Are they concerned at all about the argument that the White House is overstepping its bounds? That the President is just viscerally anti-business, which you’ve heard from many Republicans. TAPPER: Well, a senior White House official I spoke to said that they – they’re careful to walk the line and not be anti-business, they invite businesses to be part of discussions. But they say, at the end of the day, there were inequities throughout the Bush years and they need to correct those inequities. It was the wild west. And they’d rather be on their side, taking on corporate America, than on the Republican side, in their view, defending it. STEPHANOPOULOS: And, Jake, how about the Left? You know, I think the White House was hoping – they kept calling the speech the President gave on Tuesday night an ‘inflection point,’ that it would be a turning point for the President. Yet, they were met by a chorus of criticism, not only by – from conservatives, but also liberals. Concerned by that at all? TAPPER: They are concerned by that. But they think it was a good week. The President’s trip down to the Gulf, the speech, the $20 billion escrow fund and then this gift from Joe Barton, which has really been a lightning rod for the Left, far more than the White House. So I think they feel like they had a good week. Perhaps their first good week since this crisis began. STEPHANOPOULOS: You’re going to have a chance to put a lot of these questions in a big exclusive on Sunday. TAPPER: That’s right, we have an exclusive with White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel. So we’ll talk to him on Sunday. And then we’ve got a great roundtable, as well, George. STEPHANOPOULOS: Okay, Jake, we’re looking forward to that.

Continue reading here:
ABC’s Tapper: A ‘Good Week’ for White House After ‘Gift’ From Joe Barton

Keith Olbermann Wins Award for ‘Excellence in Electronic Journalism’

It sure is a sign of the times when one of the most disgraceful and unashamedly liberal personalities in the television news industry wins an award for “excellence in electronic journalism.” Despite the seeming incongruity, MSNBC’s Keith Olbermann won an Edward R. Murrow award Wednesday from the Radio Television Digital News Association. So what did Olbermann win for you ask? Writing the following tribute to his mother which aired on “Countdown” shortly after her death last year (video follows with commentary): In fairness to Olbermann, it was indeed a charming segment about her love for the game of baseball, though not surprisingly self-aggrandizing like virtually everything he does on and off the air. Of particular note was a video clip he showed of an interview he did with his mother after she was hit by a ball at a game at Yankee stadium on June 17, 2000. At the time he was working for Fox Sports. Readers are encouraged to forward to minute 3:45 when Olbermann asks his mother, “Have you been surprised by all the newspaper attention?” Her response told viewers everything they needed to know about the MSNBCer’s ego, “A little bit, but I want to know why they keep mentioning you!”  Delicious. In the end, as much as I find Keith Olbermann to be a disgusting caricature of what television journalism has degraded to in the past decade, this was certainly a touching tribute to his mother who in 2009, without any warning or apparent symptoms, died two weeks after being diagnosed with terminal cancer. I can imagine the pain he must have been going through at the time, and how difficult it was to get through those seven minutes without shedding a tear. Nice job, Keith.   That said, was this the best-written piece of electronic journalism last year, or did the folks at RTDNA get swept away by the emotional tug at the heartstrings? After all, 2009 was an eventful year what with America inaugurating its first black president, Tea parties breaking out all over the country, members of Congress getting verbally abused at town hall meetings, and the economy coming back from the brink of a depression. With this in mind, was one anchorman’s on air tribute to HIS mother REALLY worthy of such a commendation?   Before you answer, consider that NBC and MSNBC won more Murrow awards this year than any other news outlet. Any questions? 

The rest is here:
Keith Olbermann Wins Award for ‘Excellence in Electronic Journalism’

Perez Hilton to Joy Behar: I’m an Idiot, Miley Cyrus is an "Oversexualized Creature"

I used poor judgment and probably should not have posted the photo. That’s all Perez Hilton had to say about this week’s Miley Cyrus upskirt picture scandal, in which the blogger Tweeted an image that suggested the 17-year old singer wasn’t wearing underwear. Utter that one sentence and the controversy would go away. But this is Perez Hilton, of course. He craves controversy and the attention it brings. Therefore, during his appearance on The Joy Behar Show last night, he spent almost eight minutes defending his actions, saying of the pic: “It was showing Miley getting out of the car in an un-ladylike fashion. That was funny and keeping with her shocking behavior of late.” Perez Hilton Interview Perez went on to explain his side of the situation. He said: He did not pixelate or photoshop anything. He did not take the photo or even publish it originally. He simply linked to another website and that website was the one that took the picture down. He’d do it again and would publish the image on his blog right now if he had a deal with the agency that snapped it. It’s “insulting to children” to insinuate that a shot of Cyrus exiting a car, without any nudity actually depicted, would be considered child pornography. Hilton disagreed with Behar that the entire incident is “none of his business” because he said Miley was at a video shoot with paparazzi around and has “been around the block” often enough to understand what happens when cameras are around. As for the talk that he posted a picture of a 17-year old’s vagina, Perez scoffed: “I can’t help it if America has a dirty imagination.” Ironically, this comment makes him just like Cyrus. Both tease the public with sexual images and innuendo, and then play innocent when called out for it. They even turn into victims and blame us for making such supposedly wild assumptions. That’s exactly what Miley did HERE . In response to Miley’s assertion that Hilton is just some idiot , Perez agreed 100%. But said he’s having fun. He also referred to Cyrus as “oversexualized” and said she’s “turned herself into this creature,” bringing up her stage attire and recent incidents, such as Miley’s videotaped lap dance for Adam Shankman . Watch the video above and decide: Who is more annoying, Cyrus or Hilton? It’s a tough question, we know.

Go here to see the original:
Perez Hilton to Joy Behar: I’m an Idiot, Miley Cyrus is an "Oversexualized Creature"

Meet the Conservative Intellectual Elite: Kathleen Parker, David Frum, Christopher Hitchens?

There’s one big problem with the presentation of “ The Party, In Exile ,” Pamela Paul’s snobby but interesting front-page Sunday Styles section piece on so-called conservatism in exile. As Karol Sheinin noted on her Twitter feed  — it doesn’t feature many actual conservatives. The caption under John Cuneo’s illustration made the disparity clear: “Insiders On The Outside: Members of the conservative intellectual elite at a party include, clockwise from left, David Frum, Michael Oren, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Christopher Hitchens, Laura Ingraham and Kathleen Parker.” Of those six names, only one (Laura Ingraham) would be unanimously waved in to a garden party strictly for “conservatives.” The prolific, peripatetic, atheist writer Christopher Hitchens, is a long-time socialist who allied with conservatives on the Iraq War and some other issues (Paul noted he is a member “of the disenchanted left”). Former Bush speechwriter David Frum’s main interest of late is lamenting the popularity of Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck. Washington Post columnist Kathleen Parker is an inconsistent conservative ally at best. Ayaan Hirsi Ali — in whose name the party was held — may qualify as conservative in some respects. Yet the brave feminist apostate from Islam, who currently works with the American Enterprise Institute, has only been in America for four years after being forced to flee Holland. Michael Oren is Israel’s ambassador to the U.S. Otherwise, the ambience at this intimate cocktail and buffet in honor of the Somalian-born activist Ayaan Hirsi Ali — a woman who faced death threats even before she wrote a film that led to the murder of its director, Theo van Gogh — was one of ease. Wearing a Michelle Obama-esque sleeveless emerald dress and sipping wine, Ms. Hirsi Ali, who has spent recent weeks traveling to Britain, Denmark and her former country of refuge, the Netherlands, while on tour for her new book “Nomad,” warmly met guests as they circled in admiration. “Nice to see you,” total strangers said upon introduction, as if fearing the failure to recognize someone possibly met on a previous occasion. Or perhaps in certain Washington circles people assume they already know everyone else. Either way, here at the stately Wesley Heights home of the former Bush speechwriter, David (“axis of evil”) Frum, and his wife, the writer Ms. Frum, nearly everyone did. Far from the typical New York book party, this was more a bunkering of the conservative intellectual elite, a group that domineered its way through the Bush years but is now sidelined, a somewhat baffled shadow of its former blustery self. Whither the conservative establishment in today’s bilious political landscape? Certainly the typical Tea Party denizen, with his “I Wanna Party Like It’s 1773” T-shirt and “You Lie!” trucker hat, would seem out of place on the Frums’ well-tended grounds, nibbling chicken skewers and mini-B.L.T.’s. In the presence of Ms. Hirsi Ali, at least, there was a sense of shared purpose. Paul addressed the controversies surrounding Frum, who “lost his salaried post at the American Enterprise Institute, a conservative think tank, in March, after calling the passage of health care legislation the Republican party’s ‘Waterloo.'” Also present was The Washington Post columnist Kathleen Parker, prom-girl pretty and winner of a Pulitzer this spring for “gracefully sharing the experiences and values that lead her to unpredictable conclusions,” including a rebuke of Sarah Palin. “Like all the best conservatives, I started off as a liberal,” she trilled. In a similar display of the intellectual right’s discomfort with Wasilla-brand populism, Ms. Frum mocked a speech by Ms. Palin in April on The Huffington Post. (“There was not a single memorable line, not a single new political idea, not a single proffered solution beyond the cliché.”) And lending a poignant immediacy to the rejiggered state of affairs was the Republican Senator Robert Bennett, ousted last month in the Utah primary for his votes on health care and Wall Street reform. A certain kind of nomad, all. If you can get past the knee-jerk “ick, Palin!” snobbery and mockery of the Tea Party movement, the latter half of Paul’s party piece contained some interesting anecdotes about Ayaan Hirsi Ali, the Somali-born Islamist turned crusader for women and her shunning by her supposed liberal allies. Paul, to her credit, illuminated an issue Times Watch has discussed — the prickly response from the liberal media to Hirsi Ali’s crusade for women’s rights and against Islam: Not surprisingly, though she favors both gay and abortion rights, Ms. Hirsi Ali has alienated what might otherwise be fellow liberal travelers in her crusade against religious oppression. In The New Yorker, Pankaj Mishra dismissed Ms. Hirsi Ali’s “simple oppositions” and “growing familiarity with right-wing touchstones.” The Los Angeles Times called “Nomad,” which is dedicated to the former president of A.E.I., an “anti-Islamic screed” and “a tough jeremiad to read.” The historian Timothy Garton Ash and the Dutch-born academic Ian Buruma have both written dismissively of Ms. Hirsi Ali to the point that the N.Y.U. professor Paul Berman devoted much of his new book, “The Flight of the Intellectuals,” to mounting a defense. The Times review of Berman’s tome is here.

Original post:
Meet the Conservative Intellectual Elite: Kathleen Parker, David Frum, Christopher Hitchens?