Tag Archives: answers

VMA Wiz Quiz: From Madonna To Kanye, Test Your Knowledge

We’re testing celebs on their VMA memories, and now you can play at home. By Amy Wilkinson Madonna at the 1994 MTV Video Music Awards Photo: Jeff Kravitz/ FilmMagic There’s a reason we’re all excited for the 2010 MTV Video Music Awards on Sunday. Artists from Michael Jackson to Kanye West, Madonna to Lady Gaga have made some pretty memorable appearances on the VMA stage. How memorable? Well, we put together a little quiz and sent our reporters out to test celebrities on their VMA trivia knowledge. Take the quiz yourself, and then come back soon for the answers and see how well you did compared to the folks in Hollywood. 1. Madonna has won the most Moonmen in VMA history. Who’s the runner-up? A) Michael Jackson B) Peter Gabriel C) Beyonc

Moving Beyond Oil: Restoring Meaning to the Word "Necessity"

Photo via vauvau What things can you absolutely not live without? Pause for a second and really think about that. You can’t live without it. What did you come up with? This question when applied to our lives and, more importantly, the pausing it takes to honestly consider the answers, is at the heart of moving beyond our addiction to oil — that sticky, dangerous stuff we use to make a whole lot of things

Read more from the original source:
Moving Beyond Oil: Restoring Meaning to the Word "Necessity"

Justin Bieber’s Colorado Fans Would Do ‘Anything’ To Meet Him

The girls at Bieber’s Thursday night show explained their creative, and sometimes scary, schemes. By MTV News staff Justin Bieber (file) Photo: Getty Images Justin Bieber ‘s fans love him. They love his music, his hair and, well, everything about the 16-year-old teen sensation. And as much as he’s expressed his devotion back to them from the stage, on Twitter and in interviews, the dedicated teen and tween girls who watch his every move would certainly like to get a little closer to him. MTV News caught up with fans outside Bieber’s show at the 1stBank Center in Broomfield, Colorado, to find out the lengths they would go to meet the one and only Canadian pop star, and the answers were surprisingly varied and detailed. “I would do anything. I would tackle anyone for him. I love that kid,” on fan shared. Her friend added fearlessly, “I would tackle his bodyguard.” Another young fan said, “If I was in the front row then I would probably go onstage, and I wouldn’t care if security grabbed me.” Some girls were more innocent with their plans to meet Bieber — “I would run up on stage and kiss him” — and others got more creative: “I would make a video of me and put it on YouTube, like, 5,000 times,” one fan said. And then there were the more stalker-ish schemes. “I would break my leg! I don’t know,” one girl suggested. “I would do anything. I would jump off the top of that building,” was another dangerous idea. “I was thinking of climbing that curtain and going down it to see him,” one teen confessed, “but I didn’t want to get in trouble.” What would you do to meet Justin Bieber? Tell us in the comments! Related Artists Justin Bieber

Original post:
Justin Bieber’s Colorado Fans Would Do ‘Anything’ To Meet Him

CNN and MSNBC Applaud Elena Kagan’s Capitol Hill Comedy Hour

In covering Elena Kagan’s confirmation hearings, CNN and MSNBC have repeatedly lauded the Supreme Court nominee for her “flashes of humor” and “disarming ease.” In tune with the reverberations of the network morning shows’ echo chamber , correspondents like CNN’s Dana Bash and anchors like MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow on Tuesday praised Kagan for her ability to inject humor into otherwise “hollow and vapid” hearings and charm hostile Republican senators into docility. “But just on a color note, what struck me, Candy, has been the way Elena Kagan has tried to use a sense of humor to really disarm the senators, particularly Republicans,” noted Bash. Maddow’s guest, Dahlia Lithwick of the liberal Slate magazine, gushed over Kagan’s “gut-wrenching” sense of humor, her masterful ability to balance “seriousness and levity and humor,” and her “disarming and charming and kind of likeable” personality. “A likeable liberal. Dear me, I know,” quipped Maddow. Anchoring the live coverage of the hearings, MSNBC’s Chris Matthews turned to Susan Page, USA Today Washington bureau chief, who applauded Kagan’s performance: You know, it’s interesting since Kagan argued this case she feels pretty comfortable with it and you see, I think, a more free-flowing exchange between the senator and the nominee there then we’ve seen on some others. Kagan famously called these hearings “vapid and hollow” in the past but we’ve seen some flashes of humor here this morning. And interestingly, Kagan said that she thought it would be a terrific idea to have TV cameras in the Supreme Court. On her eponymous program, CNN’s Campbell Brown aired Kagan’s playful banter with Sen. Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.) before querying CNN legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin: “So, apart from the fact that she has got a sense of humor, what did we really learn today about Elena Kagan?” Over on MSNBC’s “The Ed Show,” substitute host Christopher Hayes, editor of the left-wing magazine The Nation and husband of a White House counselor, reckoned that the most newsworthy part of the hearings so far has been Kagan’s charm: Perhaps the most notable thing to report from today’s hearing is that Kagan is, as advertised, really a charmer. The nominee who once derided this process as, quote, “vapid and hollow” was no doubt probably and possibly justifiably in for a cold reception. But today, Kagan displayed the disarming ease, wit and knack for a well-timed joke that have made her so uniformly well-liked by her colleagues in other endeavors. On Wednesday’s “American Morning,” Bash continued to push the humor narrative, noting, “Throughout the day, Kagan tried to disarm senators by interjecting with humor…and Kagan really made a point early on, on setting that light-hearted tone, interjecting all the time with quick whips and — quips, I should say, and then witty comments.” MSNBC “The Daily Rundown” co-hosts Savannah Guthrie and Chuck Todd wrapped up the Wednesday program with a recap of the hearing’s most “humorous” moments, including Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) discussing the latest installment of the Twighlight saga. (H/T MRC intern Matt Hadro ) There’s nothing wrong with color commentary, but the media’s emphasis on humanizing Kagan is coming at the expense of critical reporting on her nomination hearings and what little she’s willing to shed in the hearings about how she’ll approach constitutional issues on the bench. Transcripts of the relevant portions of the cited programs can be found below: MSNBC NewsLive 6/29/10 10:54 a.m. CHRIS MATTHEWS: And this came out in the president’s State of the Union where he took a swipe at the Supreme Court with Samuel Alito and other justices there and they didn’t like it. SUSAN PAGE, USA Today Washington bureau chief: They didn’t. You know, it’s interesting since Kagan argued this case she feels pretty comfortable with it and you see, I think, a more free-flowing exchange between the Senator and the nominee there then we’ve seen on some others. Kagan famously called these hearings “vapid and hollow” in the past but we’ve seen some flashes of humor here this morning. And interestingly, Kagan said that she thought it would be a terrific idea to have TV cameras in the Supreme Court. If she gets confirmed that’s an issue where she’ll have some real issues with her colleagues. CNN Newsroom 6/29/10 12:24 p.m. DANA BASH, CNN correspondent: Well, first, just on substance, I want to point out what John did just at the beginning of this conversation, that what Elena Kagan revealed or maybe more to the point, clarified, was in the memo that she had scribbled notes, “KKK, NRA,” as a bad organization. That has been flying around conservative circles as an ah-ha moment. And when they saw these documents I think about a week or two weeks ago when they were released by the Clinton library as proof that she is just a liberal, what she told us just now, what she told Senator Kyl, is that she was taking notes on somebody else’s conversation. So if that’s the case, that certainly appears to deflate that particular argument that conservatives have been making. But just on a color note, what struck me, Candy, has been the way Elena Kagan has tried to use a sense of humor to really disarm the senators, particularly Republicans. And Jeff knows her, so this may not seem a surprise to him. But just for example, when John Kyl came out after the break, there nobody was in the room and he said “I guess nobody wants to hear my questions” and without missing a beat, she said “maybe nobody wants to hear my answers.” And another time, Senator Hatch was talking about the fact that he and Senator Leahy were having a little disagreement. They’re kind of like an old married couple, and I say this respectfully and they would probably agree, and Elena Kagan again without missing a beat saying, “don’t worry go ahead, it takes the spotlight off of me.” I don’t remember seeing that certainly from recent confirmation hearings at this level, not from Sonia Sotomayor, and at least at the beginning, you know, as these nominees are getting comfortable. But it just seems to me the kind of charm she has. MSNBC The Ed Show 6/29/10 6:17 p.m.      HAYES: Perhaps the most notable thing to report from today’s hearing is that Kagan is, as advertised, really a charmer. The nominee who once derided this process as, quote, “vapid and hollow” was no doubt probably and possibly justifiably in for a cold reception. But today, Kagan displayed the disarming ease, wit and knack for a well-timed joke that have made her so uniformly well-liked by her colleagues in other endeavors. Of course, beyond that, we still didn’t get that much of an indication of what kind of justice she’d make, although she does support letting cameras into the Supreme Court. CNN Campbell Brown 6/29/10 8:24 p.m. BROWN: It was a long day on Capitol Hill for Elena Kagan. It was day two of her confirmation hearing. It just wrapped up a little while ago. She faced some tough questions on everything from the War on Terror to her politics. Listen to this exchange with Arizona Senator Jon Kyl. Sen. JON KYL (R-Ariz.): Do you agree with the characterization by some of my colleagues that the current Court is too activist in supporting the position of corporations and Big Business? ELENA KAGAN, Supreme Court nominee: Senator Kyl, I would not want to characterize the current court in any way. I hope one day to join it. KYL: And they said you are not political, right?                      BROWN: So, apart from the fact that she has got a sense of humor, what did we really learn today about Elena Kagan? MSNBC Rachel Maddow 6/29/10 9:30 p.m. RACHEL MADDOW: And how do you think that Kagan is doing, thus far, as a nominee? Obviously, today was the first day she took questions. It’s clear that just from what I saw of the hearings today, that she seems very relaxed. DAHLIA LITHWICK, Slate senior editor: Relaxed, funny. You know, she brought the room to a standstill, just gut-wrenching laughter. At some point, Lindsey Graham asked her, what were you doing when the Christmas Day bomber was caught on Christmas Day? And she said, like pretty much all Jews, I was probably at a Chinese restaurant. I mean, you know, people were applauding. She`s very funny, Rachel. She`s very disarming. But at the same time, I think she does a good job of saying, look, I take the law very seriously. At one point, she was questioned about her passions and she couldn’t get passionate about anything but the law. So, she’s doing a good job of balancing seriousness and levity and humor, and I think real charm. The thing I really am enjoying this time around is it sometimes feels like these hearings shrink the nominee down to a smaller version of who they are. This is actually letting someone who looks good on paper but is hard to love in paper become quite human and warm and big luminous smile. And so I don’t know if that’s working for everyone, but it’s quite clear that the senators are finding her disarming and charming and kind of likeable. MADDOW: A likeable liberal. Dear me, I know. She won`t call herself liberal but the press is going to have a hard time understanding how to report on this. Dahlia Lithwick, senior editor and legal correspondent for Slate magazine, I always really appreciate your insight on days like this. Thanks a lot, Dahlia. CNN American Morning 6/30/10 7:17 a.m. BASH: Throughout the day, Kagan tried to disarm senators by interjecting with humor. Sen. TOM COBURN (R-Okla.): This is softball. KAGAN: You promise? COBURN: I promise. Sen. LINDSEY GRAHAM (R-S.C.) I just ask you where you’re at on Christmas. KAGAN: You know, like all Jews, I was probably at a Chinese restaurant. BASH: And Kagan really made a point early on, on setting that light-hearted tone, interjecting all the time with quick whips and — quips, I should say, and then witty comments. And you know, it really did change the tenor of things, for example, when one of her starkest opponents, Senator Tom Coburn, who sits here was trying to ask her some questions she wouldn’t answer it. Instead of really going after her, he made a joke. He followed her lead and said “maybe you’re dancing so much, maybe you should be on ‘Dancing with the Stars.'” John and Kiran. –Alex Fitzsimmons is a News Analysis intern at the Media Research Center. Click here to follow him on Twitter.

Read this article:
CNN and MSNBC Applaud Elena Kagan’s Capitol Hill Comedy Hour

Morality Over Monsanto: Part 2: Are you ready to take action?

In covering the environmental abuses of Monsanto one who is cognizant of the special relationship we have with the Earth cannot help but be repulsed by them. There is not one redeeming quality about them. They are arrogant, heartless, greedy, manipulative power brokers that use people, governments, organizations, consumers, and anyone else who gets in their way of domination. It is a domination of the global seed and pesticide market that is now bringing our Earth to a biodiversity and pollution crisis and a climate change precipice. They have destroyed and defiled the environment with impunity, contaminated natural seeds with unstable toxic bacteria seeds, deforested our planet to make corn for gas tanks and GM soy that brings poverty and disease to places such as Paraguay, Argentina, Mexico, India, etc., (where farmers have been committing suicides in massive numbers due to economic ruin brought on by BT cotton.) They toxified our water with PCBS, Dioxin, and Round Up, strong armed organic farmers, deceived consumers through collusion with the FDA to keep our food with GMO ingredients unlabelled, intimidated scientists who sought answers and who disseminated the answers when they found about just what their GMOs are made of and their effects, and then claim to be part of the “sustainable agriculture” movement that is looking to feed the world. It is one of the greatest and most sinister hoaxes perpetrated upon the world. In the more than one hundred years they have been in business, Monsanto has not made one product that has benefitted the Earth. From saccharin, to aspartame, to Agent Orange, to PCBs, to genetically modified organisms, there has been one and only one motive: profit at any cost. And where we stand now that cost is the biodiversity of our planet and control of the very seeds and water that give us life. It is a control we cannot give up as it would then mean the loss not only of food sovereignty but our very freedom as human beings. But even in the midst of all of this there are some bright spots. A federal court in California upheld a ban on the planting of their GM alfalfa seeds due to its being deregulated by APHIS without a proper EIS, and the planting of BT brinjal in India was denied by their environmental minister. There have been other bright spots as well from Ireland, to Poland, to even Haiti, where a seed shipment sent by Monsanto was protested with a symbolic burning of their seeds taking place just this month. Farmers all over the globe have seen the empty promises, high costs, environmental effects and deceptions of Monsanto and GMOs and are now reacting. Even farmers in our own country are speaking out against their tactics and calling for a return to sustainable agriculture in response to a Department of Justice investigation of Monsanto and seed monopolies and their business practices. And yesterday, the USSC in a ruling being spun by Monsanto, while reversing the Federal court ban on GM alfalfa did uphold it could not be planted until deregulation and a full EIS was completed, and also acknowledged that farmers have the right to challenge “gene flow” (transgenic contamination) from GM crops to their organic crops if they can show harm. That is truly precedent setting. So the question is, will this set a precedent for review of their other “seeds” such as BT corn, GM soy, BT cotton, sugarbeets, canola, etc.? We can only hope. Hopeful signs that more are waking up to the deceptions and doing the necessary research to become aware of what they are eating and modifying their habits to be more healthy. The one organization that is helping tremendously in that is the Institute for Responsible Technology headed by Jeffrey Smith, a world renowned GMO activist. They have just put together a Non GMO website that gives you top information on how to avoid GMOs and eat more healthy thus perpetuating the 5% of American consumers it will take to get to a tipping point of awareness to begin turning the tide against Monsanto and all other companies using GMOs as a profit motive while compromising our food safety in the process. This is the one true way we can all be activists: through the wallet. http://www.responsibletechnology.org Of course, I have no illusions about the clout they carry as well regarding the DOJ investigation nor the court cases coming up involving Monsanto's link to PCB poisoning. A recent trial regarding PCB contamination of Anniston Alabama and the ensuing deaths and disease from it wound up in Monsanto's favor with those sickened left with little justice for their suffering. The major clout Monsanto carries with Washington DC even now under the Obama administration and the Vilsack USDA and their company's known methods of bribery leaves one wary of such attempts to hold them accountable for their many crimes against humanity and their agricultural and environmental terrorism. After all, it was the FDA under the auspices of the last four administrations that gave them free reign over our environment and health by determining that their organisms were the same (principle of substantial equivalence) as all other food in order for them to circumvent labeling, when as we now see that is far from the truth. It was the USSC that gave them the patent to life itself thus opening the door to Intellectual Property Rights that now challenge indigenous peoples and the natural breeding of seeds for climate change tolerance which they can now purchase in biopiracy scams. In simple terms, our planet has been sold to the highest bidder in determining what we will plant, and what we will eat without our consent. That is not only undemocratic, that is immoral and criminal. However, as with any crisis we are now in regarding our planet we have one hope: ourselves. Our consciences, our morals, our reasoning, our logic, our love for our families, our love for the Earth, our sense of justice, and yes, even our spirituality that tells us in line with the scientific facts as presented to us that we in large numbers have the ability to take back our food, our planet, and our futures. So even in the face of what Monsanto has been able to accomplish I remain hopeful of the global food movement having major victories in the coming year. But we must remain focused, cohesive, determined, and yes, even angry. We must remain so for the following: For the farmers of India and their families, especially the widows of those whose lives were cut short by BT cotton. For the American farmers whose farms and livelihoods are under threat from Monsanto's strong arm tactics in their desire to control all seed. For the deforested lands of South America stripped to create a monoculture that has left many poor farmers poorer and sicker in the wake of greed over sustainability, and exacerbated a climate crisis no cap and trade scheme can heal. For the soil of our Earth, its skin, that cries out for help to us as it is eroded, stripped, abused, and toxified for profit. For our water, polluted, toxic, acidic, filled with pesticides and run off as the cost of industrial agriculture. For our children, who deserve a cleaner, safer, more natural world to live in. Let this next year be the year to truly hold Monsanto as an example of all of those things to be the first step in our moral imperative to save this planet and in turn the human species and all others we have so cavalierly dismissed in our desire to be masters of the universe. More to come. added by: JanforGore

Wakefield and Castleford struggle to square circle in golden triangle | Andy Wilson

Wakefield and Castleford – like Featherstone – provide rich talent for rugby league but financial problems could consign them to the Championship. Time to mention the M-word? Since the spring of 1995, it has been probably the most toxic subject in British rugby league, and therefore avoided by anyone with any sense. But harsh financial reality has driven the possibility of a merger between Wakefield Trinity and Castleford Tigers very firmly back on to the agenda. With less than a year before each of the existing 14 Super League clubs will have to submit applications for the next round of licences, the old Yorkshire rivals are in serious trouble. Not so much on the field, where Wakefield in particular continue to punch well above their weight, currently only one place and two points behind Hull KR, who occupy the eighth play-off position. But last Sunday’s home capitulation against Wigan suggested that even the renowned tactical and motivational abilities of John Kear and his coaching team will struggle to come close to a repeat of last year’s remarkable fifth-placed finish. That is not surprising, because for various reasons Kear has lost Danny Brough, Terry Newton, Shane Tronc and Cain Southernwood from the squad with which Trinity started the season, and the club’s tight financial situation has allowed him to sign only comparatively cut-price replacements in Paul Cooke, Danny Kirmond and Charlie Leaeno. Castleford are only two points behind Wakefield after their nervy win against the Catalans Dragons on Tuesday night, but they too are running with a cheaper squad than they had in February, after releasing the expensive but underperforming Australian scrum-half Brent Sherwin several months before the end of his contract. Neither of the clubs can afford to spend close to the £1.65m salary cap that the Super League this week voted to retain for 2011. But an even greater worry for their supporters is the long-running and ongoing uncertainty over their plans to move to new grounds a couple of junctions apart on the M62. The Rugby Football League has already made it pretty clear that without tangible progress on those grounds there will be no new licence from 2012. So officials at both clubs are only too aware that as things stand, they may well be competing for a single Super League place from 2012. But there must also be a chance that neither bid will be accepted, leaving Wakey and Cas with the stark choice of standing alone in the Championship – or coming together to stay in the Super League. Featherstone Rovers, who complete the “golden triangle” of clubs where so many outstanding players have been nurtured over the last century or more, are the interested third party, just as they were when the merger was first mooted – with a hamfisted attempt to impose it from above as part of the original Super League plans. They are currently sitting pretty, six points clear at the top of the Championship table, and enjoying their best season since 1998 under the former Leeds coach Daryl Powell. They also have arguably the best ground of the three, with realistic-sounding plans to develop it further rather than moving to a new site, and Rovers would have every right to some smug satisfaction were they to be awarded a licence from 2012 ahead of Wakefield and Cas, after missing out on the original Super League cut in 1996 merely because they happened to have had a bad season at exactly the wrong time. But there is no guarantee of that happening, either – and even if it did, it is hard to see Featherstone being any stronger in the Super League than Castleford and Wakefield are currently. As in 1996, there are powerful, logical reasons for the three rivals to come together and form a club that could challenge for honours on a regular basis, rather than scramble to survive. It is the bigger clubs, and especially Leeds, who benefit most from the current situation, as it allows them to pick off the best players from arguably the game’s most fertile nursery – either as youngsters, as in the case of Rob Burrow who played his junior rugby with Featherstone Lions, or when they have established themselves, as Gareth Ellis had with Wakefield before joining the Rhinos. Already this season Wakefield have lost Brough to Huddersfield and Southernwood to Bradford, and Castleford are as powerless to prevent Michael Shenton leaving for St Helens at the end of his contract as Featherstone were when another England centre, Paul Newlove, moved to Bradford and then Saints in the mid-1990s. Despite the levelling effect of the salary cap, which brings such sides as Leeds, Wigan, Saints, Hull and Warrington within more realistic reach of smaller clubs, it is now more than 16 years since any of the three in question won a major trophy – and even Castleford’s memorable triumph over Wigan in the 1994 Regal Trophy final is slightly soured by the knowledge that building the team to win it left the club with horrendous financial problems. But rugby league is a passionate game where supporters’ commitment to their local clubs has tended to outweigh cold, hard logic – and there’s nothing necessarily wrong in that. It is for those supporters – including the wealthier ones who keep the clubs afloat – to decide what happens next and nobody has yet been brave enough even to suggest publicly the idea of a merger. Instead Wakefield and Cas continue on their frantic scramble to start work on their new grounds by this time next year, while battling equally desperately to remain competitive on the field – and on this season’s evidence, an increasing proportion of those supporters choose to stay away. I’m not daft enough to advocate a merger. It’s not my place to do so. The sole purpose of this column is to note the real danger that Wakefield, Castleford and Featherstone will all be playing in the Championship from 2012, and that the area’s young players will no longer have even a struggling Super League option. Given that background, do not be surprised if someone finally sticks their head above the parapet, and asks the game’s most difficult question. Thoughts on the above welcome as always, from inside or outside the golden triangle, and also your answers to a hypothetical question that sprung to mind watching Queensland’s crushing victory in the second State of Origin match from Brisbane this week: how would England do against New South Wales? Wakefield Trinity Castleford Super League Rugby league Andy Wilson guardian.co.uk

Read the original post:
Wakefield and Castleford struggle to square circle in golden triangle | Andy Wilson

BREAKING: Top Kill Fails, BP Still Searching For Answers to Stop the Flow

photo via flickr The New York Times is reporting that BP’s latest attempt to stop the massive oil spill , the so called “Top Kill,” has failed. The fate of the worst oil spill in U.S. history is no unknown as BP continues to work on a way to plug the leak. BP is drilling a relief well but it’s not expected to be completed until August. The leak, found 1 mile under the sea, now threatens to continue unabated, putting the until Gulf coast in peril. … Read the full story on TreeHugger

View original post here:
BREAKING: Top Kill Fails, BP Still Searching For Answers to Stop the Flow

Was 24’s Final Season Made Up As It Went Along?

Say what you will about Damon Lindelof and Carlton Cuse, but at least they sorta had a plan. Oh sure, with a three-year jump on Lost going off the air, maybe they could have done a better job of explaining some of the series core mysteries — like, why the Smoke Monster was trapped in “Jacob’s Cabin” but also free to guard the temple and terrorize the 815 castaways, for instance — but on the whole, it seemed like they had at least thought things through. Not so for Howard Gordon though! The 24 executive producer spoke to EW following last night’s series finale, and his answers do little to retroactively inspire confidence in the 24 creative process. To put it another way: There’s a good chance this season was blocked out on a napkin.

Here is the original post:
Was 24’s Final Season Made Up As It Went Along?

‘Lost’ Star Michael Emerson Talks ‘Bittersweet’ Flash-Sideways

‘I just like how he was in a different key or he was painted with a different palette,’ he says of his character’s two worlds. By Eric Ditzian, with reporting by Josh Wigler Michael Emerson Photo: MTV News In one reality, Ben Linus is a cold-blooded killer, an always-one-step-ahead-of-you schemer — at least until he lost his leadership position, his daughter and his sense of merciless purpose. In the other, he’s a mild-mannered high school history teacher, a thwarted soul who lives with his elderly father and seems to go around wondering how his life turned out so … blah. Welcome to the two universes of season six’s “Lost”: in one, the timeline we’ve come to know since the first episode, in which Flight 815 crashed on the mysterious island and left its passengers to contend with all manner of freaky happenings; in the other, a new, so-called flash-sideways timeline, in which the island is submerged in water, Flight 815 lands safely in Los Angeles and every character lives an island-free existence. For months, we haven’t had a clue what would happen to these two realities — to these two Bens. Now, Sunday’s (May 23) series finale is behind us and the answers are in (of course, not all of them, “Lost” being a show whose answers only tend to raise more questions). What’s been clear for a while, though, is that Michael Emerson, the man behind Linus, has been having a damn good time playing each version of the guy. “I just like how he was in a different key or he was painted with a different palette,” Emerson told MTV News about sideways Ben. “He was a more muted character, more of an everyday character. Not the megalomania or the ambition or the madness or the single-mindedness or the nefariousness. Traces of those things, but in much smaller quantities, like you would get in an everyday person. It was fun to calibrate that.” Fun not just for himself, but for the rest of the cast and the fans too. “I thought the whole flash-sideways had a note that was bittersweet to it,” he added. “Oh yes, this is what a real life could be, and it’s smaller and it’s sadder and it has heroism in it, but they’re little bitty heroisms.” What did you think of the finale? Sound off in the comments! Related Videos Counting Down To The ‘Lost’ Finale! Related Photos Spin-Offs For The Characters Of ‘Lost’

Read the original:
‘Lost’ Star Michael Emerson Talks ‘Bittersweet’ Flash-Sideways

‘Lost’ Fans Gear up for Series Finale

HOLLYWOOD, Calif. — After six seasons of mystery, Lost fans will be hoping for the answers to many lingering questions when the ABC show’s finale airs Sunday night. Last Tuesday’s episode, entitled “What They Died For,” saw Jack’s group searching for Desmond and Locke devising a new strategy. Who remains standing in the end and what the island really stands are just two of the mysteries fans are still seeking answers to. read more

Read more:
‘Lost’ Fans Gear up for Series Finale