Tag Archives: Barack Obama

Obama Kids — Most Baller Father’s Day Gift Ever

Filed under: Barack Obama , Michelle Obama , Politix , TMZ Sports When your father is the Leader of the Free World, there tend to be some pretty cool perks — like when Sasha and Malia Obama went to the Lakers game last night … and picked up an AWESOME Father’s Day gift for their dad. Sources close to the situation… Read more

Link:
Obama Kids — Most Baller Father’s Day Gift Ever

Obama’s Gulf Spill Speech: "We Cannot Consign Our Children to this Future"

Photo via the New York Times Obama just wrapped his first address to the nation from the oval office, discussing the federal response to the BP Gulf spill and how the event relates to energy policy in general. The speech was pretty standard Obama — plenty of powerful rhetoric and sweeping appeals to look forward. What I was listening for, however, weren’t vague reassurances and calls to rally around clean energy. I was looking for any hints of the actual policy ideas the president intends to support to actually set those appeals into action. Here’s what I found: … Read the full story on TreeHugger

View original post here:
Obama’s Gulf Spill Speech: "We Cannot Consign Our Children to this Future"

Matthews Teases His Documentary About Scary and Violent Tea Party

If Chris Matthews’ preview, on Tuesday’s Hardball, of his MSNBC documentary Rise of the New Right, is an indicator of what his special will be like expect a lot of rehashing of Matthews’ various attacks on the Tea Party over the past year as he conflates them and the likes of Rush Limbaugh with the birther movement and ominously warns of their potential for violence. Matthews even warned his viewers that his special “will stun you” and that the “voices you’ll hear” and “the guns you see” will explain why “you’re seeing men at political rallies for the first time ever, wearing guns.” In a segment that featured conservative Pat Buchanan and leftist David Corn of Mother Jones, Matthews included the Limbaugh as a member of the “new right” that is “justifying violence.” CHRIS MATTHEWS: Pat these people are saying things about the country that just aren’t true. The President is not legitimate. That the, that the federal government is a tyranny. They are justifying violence. DAVID CORN, MOTHER JONES: Don’t forget secret FEMA camps! PAT BUCHANAN: Well look that’s, I think that’s preposterous. Look now, I’m sure you can go out there, you’ve got a country of 300 million and find people- MATTHEWS: Okay I’m talking about people like Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck, I’m not talking about strangers here. BUCHANAN: Alright but you’re taking, you take Joe McCarthy in 1954, four years into his crusade, 50 percent of the American people thought he was doing a good job. Twenty percent, what I’m saying is, take a look… MATTHEWS: That’s the point. I’m not denying the popularity of these people. That’s why we did the documentary. To say how scary it is. The following exchanges and final commentary from Matthews were aired on the June 15 edition of Hardball: CHRIS MATTHEWS: Pat you’re one of the stars of this not because you’re a current hero but because you were a pathfinder. What I find stunning about this, and I think liberals, progressives, people from the center left will be stunned and scared by what they see tomorrow night. People on the right may find themselves yelling “right on, right on!” because a lot of this documentary is people on the right saying their thing from Glenn Beck to Rush Limbaugh to Orly Taitz to all these people out there, Alex Jones, saying their thing. It’s a true documentary, as you know. What is it today that scares people about Washington government to the point where some are arming themselves? They’re calling it illegitimate. This government was elected legitimately. They’re calling it a tyranny. It’s not right/left anymore. It sounds revolutionary these people. All of them. Tea Party, militia, patriot groups, truths, birthers, the whole crowd. PAT BUCHANAN: Well, I think you’re mixing an awful lot of things. MATTHEWS: Well there’s because they use the same language. BUCHANAN: But look, look I don’t know the Michigan militia guys. I don’t go out with them into the woods and things like that. And I don’t know if these guys with guns and things like that, really represent our Tea Party. What you gotta ask, Chris, is how is it that a Tea Party that you described in a one-hour documentary as very dangerous and in some ways threatening, had a 2-1 approval record and the Tea Party was more admired and approving of than the Democratic Party and the Republican Party as of a couple of months ago. Where you’ve got it pretty close, I think Chris, is on the second part. I think the first part would be like me doing a documentary on the civil rights movement and starting off with Stokely Carmichael and H. Rapp Brown and you know Malcolm X and Elijah Muhammad and then you get around to Whitney Young and, and Martin Luther King. MATTHEWS: Yeah but Martin Luther King was never a black nationalist. He wasn’t calling for separation. Let me go to you, David. It seems like what strikes me in doing this, and reporting it is the use of the flag “Don’t Tread on Me.” The great Gadsden flag from South Carolina. These people are referring to the federal government of the United States which was honestly elected. Nobody questions the election of Barack Obama. He won with a good, what? 53, 54 percent. DAVID CORN, MOTHER JONES: Well some actually do. MATTHEWS: Well look they’re saying he’s not an American. They’re saying he’s illegitimate. CORN: Yeah. MATTHEWS: This language I’ve never heard before. CORN: What was interesting to me about, about the piece that you did was, that you show the continuum between people, Dick Armeys of the world, who you interview, who was a member of Congress, you know libertarian conservative. You know helping to stir up the Tea Party. And then you have someone like Alex Jones who you just saw in that clip. Radio talk show host who says he’s not right, says he’s not left. But he says that basically there is a planetary elite that literally has a secret plan to kill 80 to 99 percent of the population. And you have Rand Paul going on his radio show every couple of months, in which they talk about the threats to liberty. Now I’m not saying that Rand Paul believes the conspiracy theories of Alex Jones, but by appearing on that show he is somewhat legitimating- MATTHEWS: Right. CORN: -Alex Jones as a voice of the right. MATTHEWS: Why, look Dick Armey, we all like, I’ve known Dick Armey forever. Dick Armey will not disown the birthers. Now this is where I think you’re wrong Pat. Thirty-two percent of Republicans, self-identified Republicans are birthers now. They believe the President wasn’t born in the United States now. The latest CBS poll. So you can’t just say it’s a fringe crowd. BUCHANAN: Alright well let me talk as a political figure- MATTHEWS: I mean can you imagine a third of the Republicans you know believing this guy is not an American. It’s true. BUCHANAN: Well Chris there about one-third of African-Americans in this country think that George Bush was responsible for either blowing up or deliberately not doing anything- MATTHEWS: What poll was that? BUCHANAN: I saw it after New Orleans. Because they said, because it was black folks there. Now what do you do about that? Here’s what I do about birthers, I say, no. I think the Honolulu Advertiser. They didn’t huck that up. I think he was born in Hawaii. And they say, “Well we don’t think so.” I’d say, well who are you going to vote for? If the say, “Well we’re gonna vote for you I’d say thanks, fine.” But you- MATTHEWS: Even though you’re de-legitimizing the government and justifying a lot of talk here. BUCHANAN: I’m not legit-, Chris there are people out there in my movement, all over the place that got views- MATTHEWS: Okay. BUCHANAN: -that I don’t agree with. What are you gonna say? I don’t want your vote or I don’t want your vote? MATTHEWS: You don’t think it’s dangerous for people to believe this government is illegitimate? BUCHANAN: Mean in what sense? MATTHEWS: And believe it’s illegitimate. Meaning it was a usurped power taken from the people. Somehow this guy is not an American. Somehow he was elected- BUCHANAN: I understand the birthers but I don’t know anybody that doesn’t think this was a legitimate election. MATTHEWS: They say he shouldn’t have been on the ballot. CORN: This is a danger and we’ve talked about this on the show before. If you have people out there saying that Barack Obama has a, is a secret Muslim, as one of the people say on your documentary, or he has a secret plan to destroy America or that America will cease to exist if what he wants, if he wants goes through, it does send a green light, a signal to people: “Wait a second. This is about life and death.” This is… MATTHEWS: Okay let’s take a look, first of all Dick Armey. CORN: And then what do you do? People out there are gonna get the wrong message about taking extreme action. MATTHEWS: Okay. BUCHANAN: Well you know, like Lee Harvey Oswald. I mean take a look at these guys who have done all the shooting in the sixties. MATTHEWS: By the way the trouble is this rationalizes all kinds of behavior. Let’s take a look at this. This is the origins of the Tea Party voices you’ll hear right now. Let’s listen. (Clip from documentary) MATTHEWS: And then you have the head of the John Birch Society saying that Ike was a communist, his brother Milton was a communist. All communist discipline guys. Pat these people are saying things about the country that just aren’t true. The President is not legitimate. That the, that the federal government is a tyranny. They are justifying violence. CORN: Don’t forget secret FEMA camps! BUCHANAN: Well look that’s, I think that’s preposterous. Look now, I’m sure you can go out there, you’ve got a country of 300 million and find people- MATTHEWS: Okay I’m talking about people like Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck, I’m not talking about strangers here. BUCHANAN: Alright but you’re taking, you take Joe McCarthy in 1954, four years into his crusade, 50 percent of the American people thought he was doing a good job. Twenty percent, what I’m saying is, take a look… MATTHEWS: That’s the point. I’m not denying the popularity of these people. That’s why we did the documentary. To say how scary it is. … MATTHEWS: Let me finish tonight with our big documentary coming up here tomorrow night. The Rise of the New Right at 7pm Eastern tomorrow night will stun you with what’s happening with this country. You’ll never again believe this so-called Tea Party movement is just about taxes or deficits or Obamacare. No, what you’ll see is far more like the original Tea Party up in Boston, the one that previewed our war against the British. Look at the Gadsden flag they wield, that warning of “Don’t tread on me” with the coiled rattlesnake. In 1776 it served warning to those who threatened America from abroad. Today it’s being waved in contempt of our own honestly elected American government in Washington. Listen to Rush Limbaugh stir on the new right by calling the government in Washington “a regime” or Orly Taitz, leader of the birthers, calling the President illegitimate. Listen to militiamen on guard against tyranny here on the Potomac and you get the full force of what’s happening. This isn’t about what the tax rate should be. It’s an argument about whether the federal government deserves toppling like any other tyranny or illegitimate regime in history. It’s not the talk of politics, but of revolution. Listen to Limbaugh, Beck and Palin and Michele Bachmann, Orly Taitz and yes Rand Paul and you hear of a Washington that has usurped authority, of a president who is not one of us, of a Congress that needs to be investigated for treason. Of a country itself that’s been taken over and needs to be taken back. The voices you’ll hear speak for themselves. The guns you see, the semi-automatic weapons of the arms of those who see the government of the United States as the looming tower of tyranny. If I can put it as bluntly as possible, catch The Rise of the New Right here tomorrow night at 7:00pm and you’ll suddenly get why you’re seeing men at political rallies for the first time ever, wearing guns.

See the original post here:
Matthews Teases His Documentary About Scary and Violent Tea Party

MSNBC’s Schultz Asks When Obama Will ‘Become a Dictator’ on Gulf Cleanup

When asked what President Obama needs to do to prove to Americans that his administration is on top of the Gulf cleanup, Ed Schultz pressed that the President needs to call the shots and go “dictator” in his dealings with BP. “I think the President has to make it very clear to the American people tonight, Chris, that we’re not going to be stuck with the bill on this,” Schultz said about the BP oil spill. “When does the President become a dictator on this?” Schultz asked in an outburst. “When does the President start really calling the shots and saying ‘This is the number. This is what you’re going to pay. We’re not going to let you off the hook.’?” He sternly warned that BP will do its level best to escape having to pay the full cost of the oil spill cleanup, and implored the President to be frank with BP in demanding that they pay full restitution. “[BP has] destroyed our environment by going down so far, circumventing the permitting process, cutting corners, not doing everything they had to do when it came to safety,” Schultz ranted, “and… this is a defining moment for this crisis, maybe for [Obama’s] Presidency.” Little more than a month ago, Schultz lambasted a Southern congressman for downplaying the effects of the oil spill, by generalizing all Southern politicians as “drill baby drill” congressmen and senators, and questioning if America really wanted to help out the ravaged Gulf Coast states. He certainly proved his devotion to maintaining the ultra-serious nature of the oil spill in asking Obama to get his “dictator” on and smack BP around. The transcript of the MSNBC News Hour segment, which aired on June 15, at 10:06 a.m. EDT, is as follows: CHRIS JANSING, MSNBC Anchor: So Ed, what do you think the President has to say if he’s going to dispel the notion that somehow this federal government has always been a step behind this crisis? ED SCHULTZ: Well I think the President has to make it very clear to the American people tonight, Chris, that we’re not going to be stuck with the bill on this. $20 Billion in an independent fund, an escrow, is a great start but I think most Americans believe it’s going to go far beyond that for a number of years. So, this is all about the money and I think a lot of Americans, including myself, in reference to what Chuck Todd was saying, is that the White House is negotiating with BP. When does the President become a dictator on this? When does the President start really calling the shots and saying this is the number, this is what you’re going to pay, we’re not going to let you off the hook? But the fact is, we’re dealing with a multi-national that has in their DNA over the past years–that they don’t pay for everything, they never paid for everything. And I think the President has to speak straight to the American people tonight about what we’re dealing with, with a multi-national corporation that’s going to take every legal avenue they can to wiggle out of paying the bill. Now, I see that they’re taking out some nice commercials, I see that they’re doing all the right things by writing some claims, but we all know from the Exxon Valdez that this is much bigger and it is going to go on for years. CHRIS JANSING: So you want to hear the President say, look I’ve got my teams of lawyers–this is all going to be legal, but I’m going to demand from BP–I’m going to have them in the Oval Office tomorrow and here are the things that I am going to demand from them on behalf of the American people. You want him to be that blunt and straight forward? ED SCHULTZ: Absolutely. They have destroyed our environment by going down so far, circumventing the permitting process, cutting corners, not doing everything they had to do when it came to safety, and I don’t think there’s any question the President–this is a defining moment for this crisis, maybe for his Presidency, because I just think that the American people feel–and I’ve been around the country doing town halls–they feel like we’re being gamed by BP. We know how BP plays the game, we know how they wiggle out of stuff–now I think it’s important for the president to make it very clear to the American people that this is how we’re going to do this. And I think it speaks volumes that he hasn’t met with Tony Hayward. Because if he does, then he’s going to be on record. Tonight he is on record with the American people, and I think the American people are going to hold him accountable for it. CHRIS JANSING: And let me go back to the point that I was talking about with Chuck. Which is that, obviously, he’s going to get a lot of facts out there. He wants the American people to know what is going on and to know that he’s on top of what’s going on, but how much of this has to be–in spite of the fact that Barack Obama doesn’t like the use of this word–how much of it has to be theater? How much of it has to be emotion? ED SCHULTZ: Well, I think we’ve seen plenty of emotion from the people down in the Gulf. And I think the President, who has a history of being well versed, very detailed, explains things very well–he will do that, I’m sure, tonight, in his normal style of presentation. I don’t think there will be any deviation from that. I don’t think there’s going to be any emotional moment. I think he’s a serious guy and he’s got his facts and he’s going to present it out, and I think he’s going to be very thorough tonight. Pushing energy policy right now–it’s a bull horn moment, no doubt. But I’m not convinced that the American people, including myself, view tonight as ‘Okay, it’s time for some legislation. What do you say we go in this direction?’ I think it’s all about accountability right now, stopping the leak, making sure that people are made whole, and define what does ‘made whole’ mean? Does that mean this year? Next year? Because the damage that’s being done here is for years to come. Every scientist that we talk to is saying that well this is going to be going on for the next decade and it’s going to take years to clean this up. So, what does being made whole mean? A $5,000 check, a $50,000 check and we’ll see you next year? I think that the $20 billion fund is a small start in totality and the president has to make sure that he’s clear with the American people tonight that we, the American people, are not going to be stuck with BP’s bill. CHRIS JANSING: Thank you, Ed.

See more here:
MSNBC’s Schultz Asks When Obama Will ‘Become a Dictator’ on Gulf Cleanup

Politico’s Roger Simon: Obama ‘Calling Out’ Bobby Jindal’s ‘Hypocrisy’

Appearing on MSNBC’s Andrea Mitchell Reports on Tuesday, Politico columnist Roger Simon described a recent interview with President Obama: “…he showed a genuine irritation….when people like Bobby Jindal, you know, standing up, screaming about more federal action…a small-government, no federal aid kind of guy. And the President is calling out those people for hypocrisy.” Simon was discussing a quote from Obama in that interview , in which the President whined: “Some of the same folks who have been hollering and saying do something are the same folks who, just two or three months ago, were suggesting that government needs to stop doing so much.” Apparently, asking the federal government to do its job in a national emergency but not take over people’s health care is the liberal definition of hypocrisy. Earlier, Mitchell asked Simon to preview the President’s prime time address on the oil spill. Simon gushed: “…he’s cool and collected about things but he also realizes that he has to break through that, and tonight is his chance. You know, speeches have never failed Barack Obama. They started his presidential career. They’ve always rescued him at tough times…. I think he wants to re-establish that personal bond he once had with voters.” He could hardly wait for Obama’s performance: “I think tonight we saw a preview of it in Pensacola. He likes to preview the speeches like opening a play out of town before you go to Broadway.”   Here is a full transcript of the June 15 segment: 1:15PM EST ANDREA MITCHELL: For months a voice has been missing. We’ve been missing the voice of Politico’s chief political columnist Roger Simon. He has been struggling with blood poisoning. He’s now made a welcome recovery and is back stronger than ever, having just had an exclusive interview with the President, and then appeared on Meet the Press and Hardball and you join us now. Roger, it is wonderful to see you. ROGER SIMON: Wonderful to be back with you. MITCHELL: I can’t tell you how happy we are in person and also to read your great interview with President Obama. SIMON: Thank you. MITCHELL: Now you spent time – you’re the only journalist who spent time with the President recently as we prepare for tonight’s big speech. Tell us your impression of how he is handling the crisis and what he wants to project tonight. SIMON: Well, it won’t surprise you to learn that he’s cool and collected about things but he also realizes that he has to break through that, and tonight is his chance. You know, speeches have never failed Barack Obama. They started his presidential career. They’ve always rescued him at tough times and I think tonight we saw a preview of it in Pensacola. He likes to preview the speeches like opening a play out of town before you go to Broadway. And he said in Pensacola, ‘I am with you.’ He didn’t say ‘we are with you.’ He’s making it very personal. And I think he wants to re-establish that personal bond he once had with voters. MITCHELL: Now there’s also a thin-skinned aspect to the President at times. You wrote in the Politico interview, discussing the role of the government in the oil spill, you said some of the same – this is quoting the President – ‘some of the same folks who have been hollering and saying do something are the same folks who, just two or three months ago, were suggesting that government needs to stop doing so much. Some of the same people who were saying the President needs to show leadership and solve this problem are some of the same folks who, just a few months ago, were saying, this guy is trying to engineer a takeover of our society through the federal government that is going to restrict our freedoms.’ So he’s reacting to these criticisms. SIMON: He is. And that troubles him, and that’s one of the two moments I think where he showed a genuine irritation there, and – well, three moments. There, dealing with Congress on the same way: ‘Congress, if I had gone to six months before for extra money they would have said no,’ and also with the press, a continuing irritation of his. When he sees people like Bobby Jindal, you know, standing up, screaming about more federal action, more federal aid, well, six months ago, that’s not the person that Bobby Jindal was. He was a small-government, no federal aid kind of guy. And the President is calling out those people for hypocrisy. MITCHELL: Let me just ask you on a personal note, because you’ve been through Hell and back, and there you are, you’ve covered Barack Obama during the campaign, you’ve had interviews in the past, and now you’re entering the Oval Office in a very different way. They reached out to you. You also reached out to them. But how was it different and how did the President accommodate you? SIMON: I was really nervous. I felt like a summer intern on his first job. I’ve been interviewing people for decades. This felt different. You’re in the Oval Office, you’re in the center of power. And also, I must say, the President was extremely gracious. He didn’t wait in the Oval Office behind his desk for me to come in. He came out and walked down the hallway. He greeted me, we entered together, he turned around his chair to face me. So the task is to be grateful for that, which I was, and also as a journalist to fight it and still ask tough questions. MITCHELL: Well, you did it brilliantly. Roger, we are just so grateful you’re back. SIMON: Oh, I’m so happy to be back with you, Andrea. Thank you for this. MITCHELL: Thank you. And we look forward to other exclusive interviews from you, from Politico. SIMON: Thank you.       

Read the original post:
Politico’s Roger Simon: Obama ‘Calling Out’ Bobby Jindal’s ‘Hypocrisy’

What to Expect From Obama’s Oval Office Address Tonight [Speeches]

Someone in the White House has finally convinced Barack Obama to do a primetime address about the oil spill . He’ll be in the Oval Office . Fancy! But can we expect to hear anything new? Will he “act angrily” enough? More

Networks Democratic Congressman’s Street Scuffle, But ABC Pounced on Catty Crack About Boxer’s Hair

None of the three broadcast evening newscasts had even a few seconds last night for video of Democratic Congressman Bob Etheridge physically grabbing and yelling at an unidentified student attempting to ask him whether he supports President Obama’s agenda. But last Thursday, after Republican senate candidate Carly Fiorina was caught making a flip remark about Democratic Senator Barbara Boxer’s hair, ABC’s World News ran a full report on that “caught on tape political moment.” Worth noting: Back on June 10, George Stephanopoulos was sitting in for Diane Sawyer. But last night, Sawyer was back in the anchor chair. In introducing last week’s report from correspondent Jonathan Karl, Stephanopoulos touted the Fiorina flap as “ the latest caught off guard, caught on tape, all too candid political moment.” The Etheridge scuffle would surely fit that same standard, but ABC’s World News had no time on Monday to mention that embarrassment for the Democrats. Fiorina’s campaign had previously been mentioned by World News in round-up pieces about this year’s elections, but Thursday’s item about her gaffe was the first report focused exclusively on her candidacy, a Nexis search reveals: FILL-IN ANCHOR GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: And now, to the latest caught off guard, caught on tape, all too candid political moment. Just hours after she became California’s Republican nominee for the Senate, Carly Fiorina forgot that for candidates, the camera is always hot. Here’s Jon Karl on an old lesson, learned again. CORRESPONDENT JONATHAN KARL: Year of the woman, maybe. MEG WHITMAN, GOP NOMINEE for CA GOVERNOR: What a great night. KARL: Year of the political outsider, undoubtedly. CARLY FIORINA, GOP NOMINEE for U.S. SENATE: Yeah, anyway, that’s what they said. KARL: But even if your name is Carly Fiorina and you’ve never run for office before, there’s one old rule that still applies: Beware of the open mike. FIORINA, SEARCHING FOR SOMETHING ON HER BLACKBERRY: I can’t find this thing. KARL: Still basking in her primary victory, Fiorina was waiting for an interview on KXTV in Sacramento when she started musing about her opponent’s hair style. FIORINA: Lauda (sp?) saw Barbara Boxer briefly on television this morning and said what everyone says, “God, what is that hair?” So, yesterday. KARL: But it happens. Even to political pros. Jesse Jackson, talking about cutting off a part of Barack Obama’s anatomy. [on screen: “I wanna cut his n_ts off.”] George W. Bush calling a reporter a CLIP OF GEORGE W. BUSH, 2000: (bleep). CLIP OF DICK CHENEY, 2000: Oh, yeah. Big time. KARL: Judging from Fiorina’s reaction when she realized the mic was on, that won’t be happening again. Jonathan Karl, ABC News, Washington. STEPHANOPOULOS: That lesson is burned in.

See the original post:
Networks Democratic Congressman’s Street Scuffle, But ABC Pounced on Catty Crack About Boxer’s Hair

On Hardball: Obama Too Cautious About Exerting His Power

Newsweek’s Howard Fineman, on Monday’s Hardball, pushed Barack Obama to “overdo” and “overstep” in his efforts to get BP to plug the leak and stop the oil spill in the Gulf, something Fineman claimed Obama hadn’t done yet because “he’s usefully and rightfully dangerous about power. I think he thought…George W. Bush overstepped in terms of executive power…he’s an observer by nature.” This observation from Fineman seems particularly odd, as it comes at the same time the President has pushed for a $50 billion in additional domestic spending. Fineman made the comment after the Politico’s Roger Simon insisted there’s only so much Obama can do, as he insisted: “He’s not Iron Man. He cannot dive a mile underwater and stop this by himself.” However host Chris Matthews asserted Obama could do more and he asked if the President will be “tough” and “really threaten BP” and openly wondered: “Does he know he’s a powerful man?” After Fineman responded that Obama needs to “overstep” a concerned Matthews questioned: “Even at the risk of being called a socialist again?” The following exchanges were aired on the June 14 edition of Hardball: CHRIS MATTHEWS: I guess the first question is can this president honestly claim he has command and control when it looks like BP is the boss? ROGER SIMON, POLITICO: No, he can’t. And he said in the interview that “We analyzed the problem and we had no greater ability to stop the leak than BP did, so we’re gonna let BP do it.” And he can’t control BP. MATTHEWS: Well looking down the road is BP going to be the big shot, and he’s going to be, as I call him, the Vatican observer watching them do what they do? And that’s all he can do. SIMON: All he can do is threaten them. All he can do is send the attorney general down there. All he can do is threaten to, to depress their stock price to such an extent they’ll go belly up. But that’s all he can do. He’s not Iron Man. He cannot dive a mile underwater and stop this by himself. … MATTHEWS: Howard, the question I have is what can he do? I’m looking back to history. I’m a political person, not an oil person, as we all are. Harry Truman, the coal miners wouldn’t mine coal after World War II. He, he conscripted them all. He drafted them. When Big Steel raised its prices and sort of, Kennedy felt was screwing them, basically, he said “Okay I’m sending the IRS to your house. I’m gonna see if you got any, any action with your secretaries at work.” He was unbelievable! He went after them and said, “Bob McNamara don’t buy any more steel from U.S. Steel.” I mean he was unbelievable. Will this president be that tough? Will he threaten, really threaten BP with all the actions of an Executive? HOWARD FINEMAN, NEWSWEEK: Well if he, if he does he’ll only be dragged kicking and screaming into it because that’s just Barack Obama’s nature. He’s judicious. MATTHEWS: Does he know he’s a powerful man? FINEMAN: He’s, he’s an observer. I think he’s usefully and rightfully dangerous about power. I think he thought George Bush, George W. Bush overstepped in terms of executive power. And it’s also, he’s an observer by nature. But before I continue I just want to say that Roger, whom I’ve known for decades, is the best in the business and we’re so happy to have him back. And, and he’s seen this before. He’s seen presidents who use power or don’t use power. If you don’t use it, you lose it. Barack Obama should overdo. He should overstep. MATTHEWS: Even at the risk of being called a socialist again? FINEMAN: Even at the risk of having a lawsuit filed against him. The Army should be in there. The Navy should be in there. They should- MATTHEWS: Okay you agree with Roger, you agree- FINEMAN: You know, and by the way BP is not in danger of going broke tomorrow. SIMON: Right. FINEMAN: But yet Obama is putting this whole escrow idea out there, so that BP can possibly do its dividend on June 21st.

Go here to see the original:
On Hardball: Obama Too Cautious About Exerting His Power

Jonathan Alter: Health Care Puts Obama in FDR’s League

Newsweek senior editor and columnist Jonathan Alter talks about his new book, “The Promise: President Obama, Year One,” and why “Just by getting health care through … [Barack Obama is] now standing alone with Franklin Roosevelt and Lyndon Johnson in terms of domestic achievement.” Truthdig_JonathanAlter_obama.mp3

http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TruthdigPodcast/~5/OWjccxK09sk/Truthdig_JonathanAlter_obama.mp3

Read the original post:
Jonathan Alter: Health Care Puts Obama in FDR’s League

NYT Rips Obama: It Shouldn’t Have Taken So Long To Get Involved In Oil Spill

The New York Times editorial board on Sunday absolutely tore Barack Obama apart for his handling of the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.  “The president cannot plug the leak or magically clean up the fouled Gulf of Mexico. But he and his administration need to do a lot more to show they are on top of this mess, and not perpetually behind the curve,” wrote the Times.  “It certainly should not have taken days for Mr. Obama to get publicly involved in the oil spill, or even longer for his administration to start putting the heat on BP for its inadequate response and failure to inform the public about the size of the spill.”  Quite surprisingly, the Times was just getting warmed up:  If ever there was a test of President Obama’s vision of government – one that cannot solve all problems, but does what people cannot do for themselves – it is this nerve-racking early summer of 2010, with oil spewing into the Gulf of Mexico and far too many Americans out of work for far too long. The country is frustrated and apprehensive and still waiting for Mr. Obama to put his vision into action. Americans need to know that Mr. Obama, whose coolness can seem like detachment, is engaged. This is not a mere question of presentation or stagecraft, although the White House could do better at both. (We cringed when he told the “Today” show that he had spent important time figuring out “whose ass to kick” about the spill. Everyone knew that answer on Day 2.) But a year and a half into this presidency, the contemplative nature that was so appealing in a candidate can seem indecisive in a president. His promise of bipartisanship seems naïve. His inclination to hold back, then ride to the rescue, has sometimes made problems worse. It took too long for Mr. Obama to say that the Coast Guard and not BP was in charge of operations in the gulf and it’s still not clear that is true. Readers should keep in mind this editorial was likely being produced at around the same time the paper’s Washington correspondent Helene Cooper was telling Chris Matthews Obama’s presidency “will go the way of Jimmy Carter’s” if he doesn’t get control of this spill. Adding insult to injury, Times columnist Maureen Dowd also went after Obama in her piece  published Sunday: The press traveling with Obama on the campaign never had a lovey-dovey relationship with him. He treated us with aloof correctness, and occasional spurts of irritation. Like many Democrats, he thinks the press is supposed to be on his side. The former constitutional lawyer now in the White House understands that the press has a role in the democracy. But he is an elitist, too, as well as thin-skinned and controlling. So he ends up regarding scribes as intrusive, conveying a distaste for what he sees as the fundamental unseriousness of a press driven by blog-around-the-clock deadlines. Sometimes on the campaign plane, I would watch Obama venture back to make small talk with the press, discussing food at an event or something light. Then I would see him literally back away a few moments later as a blast of questions and flipcams hit him. But that’s the world we live in. It hurts Obama to be a crybaby about it, and to blame the press and the “old Washington game” for his own communication failures. Now that Obama has been hit with negative press, he’s even more contemptuous. “He’s never needed to woo the press,” says the NBC White House reporter Chuck Todd. “He’s never really needed us.” So, as The Washington Post’s Howard Kurtz writes, the more press-friendly, emotionally accessible, if gaffe-prone Biden has become “the administration’s top on-air spokesman.” How ironic. Instead of The One, they’re sending out The Two. This means that in one weekend, the Times editorial board, its White House correspondent, and one of its top liberal columnists made harshly negative comments about the president they all helped get elected. This led Commentary magazine’s Jennifer Rubin to write Sunday: It’s one more sign that the bottom is dropping out on Obama’s support, and the unraveling of his presidency is picking up steam. Unless he gets a grip and finds some grown-ups from whom he is willing to take advice, this is not going to improve.  Indeed. 

Original post:
NYT Rips Obama: It Shouldn’t Have Taken So Long To Get Involved In Oil Spill