Tag Archives: Boston

Jeremy Renner Signed For ‘Mission: Impossible IV’

Paramount announced addition of ‘Hurt Locker’ actor to star alongside Tom Cruise in next ‘M:I’ installment. By Kara Warner Jeremy Renner Photo: Kevin Winter/ WireImage From “The Hurt Locker” to Hawkeye in “The Avengers” to a role opposite superspy Ethan Hunt, Jeremy Renner’s career is on the rise, as Paramount announced today that the seasoned yet rising star will appear as an operative alongside Tom Cruise in “Mission: Impossible IV.” According to Deadline , Paramount production chief Adam Goodman feels Renner “has a Daniel Craig quality” that he wants for the role. Sources tell the site that the studio was also looking for an actor who might be able to continue on with the franchise, should Cruise choose not to return in the future (Cruise is expected to return for a fifth installment). Other actors considered for the role include Tom Hardy (“Inception”), Chris Pine (“Star Trek”), Kevin Zegers, Christopher Egan and Renner’s “Hurt Locker” co-star Anthony Mackie. Although the production has had a few bumps and uncertainties along the way, Cruise has been vocal about his commitment to bring in new talent to the franchise. “My whole thing with the series is always having a new director come on and put their stamp on ‘Mission: Impossible,’ ” he told MTV News recently. “Brian De Palma was first, then John Woo, J.J. Abrams and now Brad Bird, so it will be Brad Bird’s ‘Mission: Impossible.’ ” Regarding his thoughts on the story line — which is, of course, heavily under wraps — Cruise said simply: “It’s sick. It’s fun, really fun.” Ever since his star-making turn in last year’s award-season darling (and Best Picture winner) “The Hurt Locker,” Renner has been lining up a slate of prestigious and high-profile projects. He’ll next appear in Ben Affleck’s much buzzed about Boston drama “The Town,” followed by a stint as superhero Hawkeye in Joss Whedon’s “Avengers,” and then his role in “Mission: Impossible IV.” The production, directed by Bird, with Cruise and J.J. Abrams producing, is set to begin shooting this fall. Check out everything we’ve got on “Mission: Impossible IV.” For breaking news, celebrity columns, humor and more — updated around the clock — visit MTVMoviesBlog.com .

See the original post here:
Jeremy Renner Signed For ‘Mission: Impossible IV’

Nearly Half of United States Considering Arizona-Style Immigration Legislation

Twenty-two states are now in the process of drafting or seeking to pass legislation similar to Arizona’s law against illegal immigration. This is occurring despite the fact that the Obama administration has filed a lawsuit against the Arizona law and a federal judge has ruled against portions of that law – a ruling that is now being appealed.   Next month, two Rhode Island state lawmakers, a Democrat and a Republican, will travel to Arizona to speak with Republican Gov. Jan Brewer, local sheriffs, and other officials about how to better craft their own bipartisan immigration bill for Rhode Island, which already has been enforcing some federal immigration laws.    Meanwhile, 11 Republican state lawmakers from Colorado traveled to Arizona this week to meet with officials there on how to craft legislation for the Mile High state.    In addition, Alabama House Republicans announced this week that they would seek to “push an illegal immigration bill similar to the recently approved Arizona law.” This law would “create a new criminal trespass statute that allows local law enforcement to arrest illegal immigrants for simply setting foot in Alabama,” said Alabama’s House Minority Leader Mike Hubbard.    In Florida, proposed legislation against illegal immigration has been retooled to address some concerns raised by a federal judge who blocked the proposed bill, though it would still allow Florida state police to enforce immigration law.    In all, there are 22 states considering copycat legislation from the Arizona law against illegal immigration, according to the  Americans for Legal Immigration Political Action Committee  (ALIPAC), a group that advocates for stricter immigration enforcement. These illegal immigrants, deported to Mexico on Wednesday, July 28, 2010, are shown near the Nogales Port of Entry in Sonora, Mexico. (AP Photo/Jae C. Hong)Arizona’s law mirrors federal law. It requires local law enforcement officers during a lawful stop to determine the immigration status of an individual by asking the person to show identification that residents are already required to carry by law; and it authorizes law enforcement to securely transfer verified illegal aliens to federal custody.    The law prohibits racial profiling and gives state residents the right to sue local agencies for not complying with the state law.   In the lawsuit challenging the Arizona law, the Obama administration said the United States should not have a “patchwork” of 50 different immigration laws. In late July, U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton ruled against most of the major elements of the Arizona law, halting their implementation.  That ruling is now in the appeals process.    “We do not expand on federal law,” Florida state Rep. William Snyder, the sponsor of the bill in his state, told CNSNews.com. “We do not change penalties. The goal is not to create a new immigration framework at the state level.”   Snyder, the chairman of the Florida House Criminal Justice Committee, said his staff attorneys have taken the decision by U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton into consideration in re-crafting their bill for the next state legislative session.    Snyder said the office of state Attorney General Bill McCollum has reviewed the legislation, as have committee attorneys, and they believe it will withstand a potential legal challenge from the Obama administration.    McCollum, a GOP candidate for governor, supports the legislation. However, Gov. Charlie Crist, a Republican-turned-Independent candidate for U.S. Senate, opposes the proposal.  Alfredo Salas, 28, shows his license Thursday shortly after being pulled over and let off with a warning for a cracked windshield by the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office during a crime and immigration sweep. (AP Photo/Amanda Lee Myers)”We will continue to work with the language,” Snyder said.    In Rhode Island, a bill that was introduced late in the session last year, and thus never reached a vote, is expected to be reintroduced in the 2011 session. Its two lead co-sponsors hope to have a bipartisan bill that will withstand a legal challenge after they meet with Arizona officials.    “It exactly mirrors the Arizona law,” Rhode Island state Rep. Peter Palumbo, a Democrat, told CNSNews.com. “We will tweak the bill.”   Palumbo will be going to Arizona with Rhode Island state Rep. Joseph Trillo, a Republican.    Their legislation would essentially codify an existing executive order signed in 2008 by Gov. Donald Carcieri, a Republican, mandating immigration checks on all new state workers and ordering state police to assist federal immigration officials.   This is Carcieri’s final year in office, so Palumbo said it is important to put the force of law behind what has already been Rhode Island policy. State troopers report illegal immigrants they encounter for speeding and other offenses to the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) office.   Because of the executive order in 2008, corruption was discovered in the Department of Motor Vehicles, with drivers licenses being sold to illegal aliens,  Palumbo said.     In New Jersey, state Rep. Allison Little McHose, a Republican, introduced a series of proposals that focused primarily on requiring employers to verify the legality of workers, and preventing state benefits from going to illegal aliens.    “New Jersey continues to be a sanctuary state for illegals because they know they can come to the state and receive many free benefits, like medical care,” McHose said in a statement. “The benefits may be free for those receiving them, but not the rest of the public because these costs are borne by the taxpayers.”   Other states with proposals that mirror the Arizona law are Arkansas, Idaho, Indiana, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas and Utah.   “We are very pleased to announce 22 states are now following Arizona’s lead to pass versions of a law that has the support of 60 percent to 81 percent of Americans according to polls,” said ALIPAC President William Gheen in a statement. “State and federal candidates are rushing to display their support for Arizona’s law and immigration enforcement. We will not stop until all American states are protected from this invasion as mandated by the Constitution of the United States.” Crossposted at NB sister site CNS News

Link:
Nearly Half of United States Considering Arizona-Style Immigration Legislation

Andrea Mitchell Wistfully Yearns for Ted Kennedy’s Presence In Passing Liberal Legislation

On Friday’s edition of MSNBC’s Andrea Mitchell Reports, Mitchell brought on the Boston Globe’s Peter Canellos to pine for the widow of Ted Kennedy, Vicki, to challenge Republican Scott Brown for the Massachusetts Senate seat, as well as imagine how effective the liberal “lion” would be in championing health care and unemployment extension legislation if he were still around today. A wistful Mitchell remarked of the the late Senator: “It seems as though his legacy only grows in contrast to how low, what low regard the Senate is now held because of the gridlock and the, the sort of petty differences.” Mitchell then set up the Globe’s editorial page editor as she questioned if Kennedy “were trying to pull things together politically today, if we were blessed by his presence…do you think it would still be the passion for health care, or would he be looking to the larger economic issues?” To which Canellos remembered fondly: “When it comes to unemployment, I mean you can easily hear him…thundering against those who would deny unemployment to people who have been suffering.” The following is the full exchange as it was aired on the August 20 edition of MSNBC’s Andrea Mitchell Reports: ANDREA MITCHELL: Next week will mark the first anniversary of the death of Senator Ted Kennedy. There is increasing talk in political circles about whether his wife Vicki will enter politics in Massachusetts. Peter Canellos is the Boston Globe editorial page editor and a columnist and author of Last Lion: The fall and Rise of Ted Kennedy, now out in paperback. Peter thanks so much for joining us. A year later, what a change in Massachusetts politics. And we’ve seen also the pressure on Vicki Kennedy, I guess Democrats are looking for anybody to go up against the very popular political figure there, Scott Brown. PETER CANELLOS, THE BOSTON GLOBE: Yeah. I think that’s true. And I think there’s the feeling that the state has lost a lot with the Kennedy franchise kind of sidelined. And so it’s both a desire to have a good candidate against Scott Brown but also a desire to kind of rekindle the Kennedy mystique. MITCHELL: What is happening with the other members of the family and whether or not Joe Kennedy or, or any of his offspring might also be willing to get back into politics? CANELLOS: Well I think some of his offspring will get involved in politics but not run for the Senate. They would probably run for the House. MITCHELL: Right. CANELLOS: He has two 28-year-old sons. Whether he will run, whether Vicki will run, it’s all a matter of speculation right now. And they’re, they’re all downplaying it. So I would say that it’s probably more likely than not that none of the Kennedys will run. But, but nonetheless, as long as that possibility is out there, people are gonna cling to it. MITCHELL: Well one of the things that she said, that Vicki said to the Globe in an interview about this anniversary is, “My heart is so heavy. I like to just keep busy and keep moving on. And that’s why it’s been great to kind of get around. And when people honor Teddy, to be there, to always sort of look at it, from his point of view, the future, and to try to make a positive difference going forward. But when you get into that level of really thinking about, really living his life, that’s a step that’s just too hard. That’s too hard.” Thinking about trying to step into a campaign and the Senate seat. That is different from going and representing him and speaking about his legacy. CANELLOS: Oh, absolutely. And, you know, right now she’s kind of a beloved figure, and you know, people’s, you know, grief over, over his loss is sort of translated into kindness towards her. As soon as she runs for the Senate, you know, she’ll be hammered on the issues. You know she’ll have challengers. It will, will be very, very tough for her. So she has to be emotionally ready. And it doesn’t sound at all like she is right now. MITCHELL: And in thinking back over this past year, and we were up there in Hyannis a year ago and went through all of that with that extraordinary funeral and the procession and coming back to the burial at Arlington, it seems as though his legacy only grows in contrast to how low, what low regard the Senate is now held because of the gridlock and the, the sort of petty differences. CANELLOS: Yeah. I agree. And I think they miss, they miss him a lot in the Senate. I mean, he was a great sort of deal maker. And that’s, that’s precisely what they’ve missed in the last year. MITCHELL: One of the things that back in the, in the day when he was in the Senate really actively working with Republicans, if you recall back when Dan Quayle and Ted Kennedy were working on unemployment legislation together. That doesn’t happen these days. CANELLOS: Yeah. It really doesn’t happen these days. I think people were partly drawn to kind of the Camelot mystique in him, but then they were totally taken by him. He was very gregarious but he was an extraordinary hard worker and I think he, he sort of kept them honest in a way. MITCHELL: And if, if he were trying to pull things together politically today, if we were blessed by his presence, what would be his focus? Do you think it would still be the passion for health care, or would he be looking to the larger economic issues? CANELLOS: Yeah I think a little of both. He certainly would be working to shore up the health care achievement and would be out there promoting it probable more aggressively than the Democrats are right now. But I think when it comes to, to unemployment, I mean you can easily hear him, you know, thundering against those who would deny unemployment to people who have been suffering. You know he would have, he knows sort of, he knew when to make things a political issue. And, and for example, the unemployment insurance extension would have been one that he would, you know, thunder about at a, in a partisan way. But then when it came to sort of cutting a deal to get it done, he would be willing to sort of take half a loaf rather than nothing. MITCHELL: Well when you think that it was only two years ago that he came out of a hospital bed to make that farewell speech at the Democratic Convention in Denver, and then a year ago we were in, in Hyannis and in Boston, of course, for the funeral. Peter Canellos, thank you very much. This is a figure who becomes larger even after life, as large as he was in life. Thank you, Peter. CANELLOS: Thank you, Andrea.

Visit link:
Andrea Mitchell Wistfully Yearns for Ted Kennedy’s Presence In Passing Liberal Legislation

Eat, Pray, Love: Modern Lady & Friends Love Chick Flicks (and Javier Bardem)

infoMania's resident Modern Lady, Erin Gibson, gathers her lady friends for the chick flick event of the summer, Eat, Pray, Love. With particular insight, and a lot of pinot grigio, the ladies review the film, the book, and most importantly James Franco's butt. Two thumbs up! In each episode of Modern Lady, Erin Gibson explores the often-conflicting ways in which today's media tells women to work, love, and be ladies. For more Erin visit: http://current.com/shows/infomania/modern-lady/ and Current TV infoMania is a half-hour satirical news show that airs on Current TV. The show puts a comedic spin on the 24-hour chaos and information overload brought about by the constant bombardment of the media. Hosted by Conor Knighton and co-starring Brett Erlich, Erin Gibson, Ben Hoffman, Bryan Safi and Sergio Cilli, the show airs on Thursdays at 10/9c on Current TV. added by: Erin_Gibson

Target Corp. and Best Buy Co. institutional shareholders urge Target to look at political giving

MINNEAPOLIS (AP) — A few Target Corp. and Best Buy Co. institutional shareholders weighed in Thursday on the flap over the companies' political donations in Minnesota, urging the boards of both retailers to increase their oversight of campaign contributions. Walden Asset Management and Trillium Asset Management Corp., both of Boston, and Bethesda, Md.-based Calvert Asset Management Co. filed shareholder resolutions with both companies. Together, the three firms control less than 1 percent of each company's outstanding shares – 1.1 million Target shares worth $57.5 million and 344,000 Best Buy shares worth $11.3 million – but they are moving the debate over the political giving to a new arena. “A good corporate political contribution policy should prevent the kind of debacle Target and Best Buy walked into,” said Trillium vice president Shelley Alpern. “We expect companies to evaluate candidates based upon the range of their positions – not simply one area – and assess whether they are in alignment with their core values. But these companies' policies are clearly lacking that.” The shareholders said the donations don't mesh with corporate values that include workplace protections for gay employees and risk harming the companies' brands. Walden senior vice president Tim Smith said such giving can have “a major negative impact on company reputations and business.” The Target resolution urges the board to review the effect of future political contributions on the company's public image, sales and profitability and to consider the cost of backing a candidate whose politics conflict with the company's public stances. The three investment companies together submitted the resolution to Target, while Calvert and Trillium filed the Best Buy shareholder proposal. One of Trillium's clients, the Portland, Ore.-based Equity Foundation, divested a small Target holding of 170 shares on Wednesday. added by: toyotabedzrock

Cenk Uygur’s Pitchfork Populism: Raising Taxes Will Solve Income Disparity

Want to see a textbook example of how the left has tried to frame the debate against extending the Bush tax cuts? Take a look at Cenk Uygur, of “The Young Turks” fame, playing the class warfare/populism card. On MSNBC’s Aug. 17 broadcast of “The Dylan Ratigan Show,” Uygur was up in arms over the argument that taxes shouldn’t be raised by allowing the Bush tax cuts to expire. He alluded to Berkshire Hathaway CEO Warren Buffett, who made the case in 2007 that the wealthy should give more to society. “Look at what Warren Buffett said,” Uygur said. “He’s talking to 400 wealthy donors and he says, ‘Look, the 400 of us pay a lower part of our income in taxes than the receptionists do, than our cleaning ladies do. For that matter, if you’re in the luckiest 1 percent of humanity, you owe it to the rest of humanity to think about the other 99 percent.'” And Buffett has been a long-time advocate of higher tax rates – something easy to be for when you’re one of the richest men in the world. However, Uygur says it’s not good enough for Buffett to be charitable. According to Uygur, this “giving” must come in the form of “mandatory” higher taxes. “I would disagree with Warren Buffett a little bit,” Uygur said. “I love that he’s encouraging them to do voluntary giving away of the money, as he did, as Bill Gates is doing. But I would make it mandatory. I’m not going to wait for [Blackstone CEO] Stephen Schwarzman to do the right thing. I’m going to say your tax rate at 15 percent is mental. I’m going to change that to a reasonable tax rate – like 35 percent or what Clinton had at point, near 40 percent.” Later in the segment – Uygur tried to say higher taxes were necessary because of the disparity in income growth, which he insinuated would bridge this gap income, even though there’s no evidence higher taxes will mean income growth for the bottom 80 percent of income earners. “Here’s what the results are – so the top 1 percent from 1979 to 2007, they had their incomes go up from $347,000 to $1.3 million. It worked for the rich. But did it work for the rest of us, Dylan?” And self-proclaimed advocate of economic justice went on to point out that since the rich got wealthier and the lower 80 percent haven’t, the idea of lower taxes is even more so flawed. “The top 1 percent nation’s income, doubled in that time period – doubled,” Uygur said. “How about us? Bottom 80 percent share of the nation’s income fell by 10 percent. It didn’t work for the rest of us.” However, what Uygur and his ilk always neglect to mention when they play this populist card by suggesting “the rich aren’t paying their fair share” and correlate income disparity to tax rates is that the wealthy pay more than their share if you look at federal revenues overall. According to Jeremy Weltmer, writing for Americans for Tax Reform , the tax system in the United States is already “steeply progressive.” “As of 2006, the tax burden of the top 1 percent of taxpayers exceeds the tax burden of the bottom 95 percent combined,” Weltmer wrote. “Moreover, according to the National Taxpayers Union, households in the top 5% by income have been paying about 60% of the federal income tax bill for years.”

The rest is here:
Cenk Uygur’s Pitchfork Populism: Raising Taxes Will Solve Income Disparity

Craigslist killer dead

Philip Markoff(Craigslist killer), 24, was pronounced dead at 10:17 a.m. by Boston Emergency Medical Services, said Steven Thompkins, chief of external affairs for the Suffolk County Sheriff’s office in Boston. Accused “Craigslist killer” Philip Markoff — who was awaiting trial on charges that he killed a New York masseuse in a hotel room — committed suicide this morning in a Boston jail, officials said. “Markoff was alone in his cell, and all evidence collected thus far indicates that he took

See the rest here:
Craigslist killer dead

Megan McAllister and Philip Markoff

Philip Markoff was engaged at the time of his arrest. His fiancee, Megan McAllister, ended the relationship with Markoff after visiting him in jail, and their wedding, scheduled for Aug. 14, 2009, was subsequently canceled. Megan McAllister is the fiancee of Philip Markoff, the suspected “Craigslist Killer.” She has written in defense of her fiance, saying that he is #39;an intelligent man who is just trying to live his life. A former medical student accused of killing a masseuse he met thr

The rest is here:
Megan McAllister and Philip Markoff

‘Craigslist Killer’ commits suicide in Boston jail

Accused “Craigslist Killer” Philip Markoff committed suicide at the Nashua Street Jail in Boston, where he was being held awaiting trial in the slaying of Julissa Brisman, according to Steven Tompkins, spokesman for the Suffolk County Sheriff's Office. Markoff, 24, was pronounced dead at 10:17 this morning. He was found suffocated with a plastic bag over his head, according to a law enforcement official briefed on the investigation. While authorities are still investigating, Markoff was alone in his cell and all evidence collected so far indicates that it was a suicide, said a statement released by Boston Police Commissioner Edward Davis and Suffolk County District Attorney Daniel F. Conley. http://www.boston.com/news/local/breaking_news/2010/08/accused_craigsl_2.html added by: Stoneyroad

JetBlue Flight Diverted — Unruly Passenger

TMZ has learned … JetBlue flight attendants have just subdued a passenger who went nuts on a flight from Boston to Santo Domingo. A JetBlue source tells us an unruly female passenger caused a ruckus on Flight 691 .