Tag Archives: Breaking News

NYT’s Herbert: Obama and Democrats Wasted Once In a Lifetime Opportunity

Add New York Times columnist Bob Herbert to the growing list of liberal media members realizing that Barack Obama’s campaign slogan “Hope and Change” was nothing but a great sales pitch. “Mr. Obama and the Democrats have wasted the once-in-a-lifetime opportunity handed to them in the 2008 election,” wrote Herbert Tuesday. “They did not focus on jobs, jobs, jobs as their primary mission.”  No, they sure didn’t. Instead, they worked on a stimulus package that has done nothing but add to the debt, a healthcare bill that WILL do nothing but add to the debt, and a cap and trade bill that if ever passed will cost jobs in virtually every industry. As Herbert continued, he surprisingly noted how disappointed Americans are in the failure of this administration to do what the country needed most: Mr. Obama had campaigned on the mantra of change, and that would have been the kind of change that working people could have gotten behind. But it never happened. Job creation was the trump card in the hand held by Mr. Obama and the Democrats, but they never played it. And now we’re paying a fearful price. The Obama administration feels it should get a great deal of credit for its economic stimulus efforts, its health care initiative, its financial reform legislation, its vastly increased aid to education and so forth. And maybe if we were grading papers, there would be a fair number of decent marks to be handed out. By nearly 2 to 1, respondents to the most recent New York Times/CBS News poll believed the United States is on the wrong track…Fifty-four percent of respondents believed he does not have a clear plan for creating jobs. Only 45 percent approved of his overall handling of the economy, compared with 48 percent who disapproved.  It’s not too late for the president to turn things around, but there is no indication that he has any plan or strategy for doing it. Truth be told, he never did. “Hope and Change” wasn’t a plan for anything. It was a dream spun by a very well-spoken, charismatic man that liberal media members like Herbert fell in love with and married on Election Day 2008. Conservatives across the fruited plain tried to convince folks before the wedding that they were being sold a magic elixir by an astonishingly unqualified person that had never created a job for another human being in his entire life and didn’t have the slightest idea how. But love is blind, so much so that Herbert and his ilk assisted this man in selling the dream to others. Now that the fantasy has turned into a nightmare, we can only hope that folks like Herbert who are beginning to realize they were taken will be more concerned for their nation and their fellow citizens than the Party they support. After all, the Democrats have controlled Congress for three and half years, and the White House for seventeen months. Is the country better off today than it was in January 2007? Or January 2009? Are we any closer to a path that leads us to both answers being “Yes?” If not, and folks like Herbert are starting to realize it albeit it kicking and screaming, then maybe they should consider a divorce. This shouldn’t be tough for liberals – they do it all the time. 

See the original post:
NYT’s Herbert: Obama and Democrats Wasted Once In a Lifetime Opportunity

Alex Has Become the First Hurricane of the Season, as It Hits the Gulf of Mexico, Says the National Hurricane Center | Updates

CNN's Breaking News: Alex strengthens in the Gulf of Mexico, becomes the first hurricane of the season, the National Hurricane Center says. added by: EthicalVegan

world cup 2010 Spain vs Portugal highlights

Portugal#39;s Tiago, top, and Spain#39;s Sergio Busquets grapple for the ball during the World Cup round of 16 soccer match between Spain and Portugal at the Green Point stadium in Cape Town, South Africa, Tuesday, June 29, 2010. Spain leads Portugal 1-0 of their second-round World Cup match on David Villa#39;s fourth goal of the tournament. Villa was sent through down the left in the 63rd minute by a Xavi Hernandez heel pass, but his left-footed shot was saved by Portuguese goalkeeper Eduard

Link:
world cup 2010 Spain vs Portugal highlights

Olbermann: Palin a ‘Phony,’ ‘Idiot’

Name-calling isn’t just for 6-year-olds anymore. Keith Olbermann proved once again that Sarah Palin is the media’s favorite conservative to hate, mock and condemn when he called Palin an “idiot” who endorses “stupidity instead of intelligence.” Olbermann named “Sister Sarah” his “Worst Person in the World” on “Countdown” June 28 after Palin mistakenly said Ronald Reagan’s alma mater was “California’s Eureka College” during a speech at Cal State Stanislaus. Reagan attended Eureka College in his hometown of Eureka, Ill. In addition to labeling her speech a “gaffe fest,” Olbermann called her mistake “symbolic of her imbecility, her corner-cutting,” saying it was one of “perhaps, 100 things that brand her as a phony.” One wonders where Olbermann’s outrages was when then-candidate Obama mistakenly said in June 2008 that he’d been to 57 states. This isn’t the first time Olbermann has unleashed on a conservative woman. Olbermann gave Palin the moniker “Worst Person in the World” last May after Palin refused to appear on his show. Olbermann also called her “idiot-woman” once and “idiot” twice after Palin nixed a “Countdown” appearance. Olbermann has also ridiculed Minnesota Congresswoman Michele Bachmann in the past by comparing her son’s participation in Teach for America to a Star Wars-like crossing over to “the dark side.” During the 2008 presidential campaign, Olbermann also called Palin “sick” and an “out of control liar” for “cutting” her state’s special-needs program. The accusation was misleading-Palin had really increased the program’s funding by 10 percent.

Link:
Olbermann: Palin a ‘Phony,’ ‘Idiot’

NYT’s Stolberg: Kagan a ‘Brilliant Woman…Who Is Also Very Funny and Warm and Witty’

New York Times reporter Sheryl Gay Stolberg reported this tidbit Tuesday from the opening day of confirmation hearings for Elena Kagan , Obama’s nominee to replace Justice John Paul Stevens on the Supreme Court. Democrats described her as a brilliant thinker with what Senator Charles E. Schumer of New York called “unprecedented practical experience.” Stolberg had expressed the same feelings about Kagan the day before, roughly two minutes into the Monday edition of TimesCast , a brief news preview that airs every weekday at nytimes.com. Kagan is so “brilliant,” gushed Stolberg, that she didn’t even need help from White House staffers in preparing to face her Republican critics. Stolberg was confident the GOP would “have a tough time” confronting the “very funny and warm and witty” Kagan. They will try to paint her as a partisan, as a political lawyer, as someone who is more interested in a politically driven agenda than in applying the law in an even-handed way to judicial cases. And they’ll take her to task for never having been a judge. But I think they’ll have a tough time. Let’s not forget that Elena Kagan has been an academic. She is a brilliant woman. She’s somebody who is also very funny and warm and witty, and I think Americans will see that when they-when she comes before the Senate today . They will see somebody who has studied and thought deeply about the law, and it’s interesting. Many Supreme Court nominees go through the process known as ‘murder boards,’ where the White House will stage kind of a mock hearing, and people will play the role of senators, and they’ll grill nominees on how would you answer this or that. Elena Kagan has done some of that, White House officials tell me, but in fact she’s also spent a lot of time preparing for these hearings just on her own, just thinking about the issues and thinking about what she wants to say. White House officials say that that’s how she wanted to prepare, and frankly she doesn’t really need the kind of murder boards that other Supreme Court nominees have needed.

Here is the original post:
NYT’s Stolberg: Kagan a ‘Brilliant Woman…Who Is Also Very Funny and Warm and Witty’

Megan Fox and Brian Austin Green married

Megan Fox, 24, extended the pair#39;s vacation and exchanged vows with her on/off partner of six years at the Four Seasons Hualalai Resort in Hawaii late last week. Megan Fox is s-exy and single no more – the actress has married her longtime partner Brian Austin Green, according to US reports. The Transformers star became engaged to Green for a second time in early June during a romantic beach vacation in Hawaii. And she hasn#39;t wasted any time in getting married, even though she recently t

Read the rest here:
Megan Fox and Brian Austin Green married

Tiiu Kuik Height Bio

Biography for Tiiu Kuik Born: 16 March 1987 Where: Estonia Height: 180 cm Bust: 85 cm Waist: 60 cm Hips: 90 cm Tiiu Kuik (Estonian pronunciation: [tiːu kuik]) (born 16 March 1987)is an Estonian model. Born in Tallinn, Estonia, Kuik was discovered at age 13 in an Estonian supermarket by model scout Paolo Moglia.She was then sent to Japan for modeling work, and after that, to Italy. Her modeling career has skyrocketed since. She has walked the runways for more than 50 designers, including Gucci

Original post:
Tiiu Kuik Height Bio

Kudlow, Forbes Debunk Krugman’s ‘Third Depression’ Call

It’s hard to imagine an economist being provocative, but Paul Krugman, a Nobel Prize winner, has managed to do so. In his June 28 New York Times op-ed , Krugman argued that since governments around the world aren’t willing to double-down on Keynesian policies meant to stimulate the global economy, the United States and the rest of the world are facing a third depression. But on CNBC’s June 28 “The Kudlow Report,” host Larry Kudlow asked if Krugman’s premise were true, how come none of the measures being applied, which Krugman advocates more of, have failed to have any effect on the current economy. “Steve Forbes, I want to focus this, coming out of G-20,” Kudlow said. “Paul Krugman’s remarkable op-ed today in The New York Times – he says, we are already in the early stages of a depression. He calls it the third depression in U.S. history. He says that it’s primarily a failure of policy. But, Steve, the so-called spending cuts or tax increases or deficit reduction hasn’t happened yet. In the last two years, we’ve had gargantuan spending and ultra-easy money which is what Professor Krugman has been advocating the whole time. And he still thinks we’re in a depression. So I need to ask you, maybe his policies are what threaten the depression.” Forbes magazine CEO Steve Forbes argued the pro-growth approach was the proper means – a stronger dollar and low tax rates.  “Well, it’s like the old physicians who continue to bleed the patient and wonder why the patient isn’t getting better and then bleeds the patient even more,” Forbes explained. “What we should be doing, yes, we should be cutting back spending because it takes money from productive citizens. But as you know, Larry, two other things have to be done, reducing tax rates or at least not increasing tax rates and stabilizing the dollar. So people can trust it again. Sound money, low tax rates, that’s the cure.” However, Dean Baker, a liberal economist and the co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research in Washington, D.C. argued the U.S. dollar was strong enough, because as investors flee from other currencies , they are seeking safety in the U.S. dollar and treasuries. But against gold, as Forbes pointed out, the U.S. dollar has taken a dive . “Well, Steve must have not been following things very closely because people have a lot of faith in the dollar,” Baker said. “That’s why it’s been rising so much.” “Not against gold, which is the best barometer of the dollar,” Forbes fired back. Nonetheless, Baker continued to make Krugman’s case – that this was analogous to a forest fire with only a few buckets of water to put it out, which aren’t working meaning there was a need for more so-called medicine from the government. “That’s fine, every other currency in the world,” Baker said. “Interest rates are at near-record lows, so that’s not keeping people from investing. Low tax rates – well, tax rates were higher back in the 90s when the economy was growing at a record pace. So none of that really fits. Krugman’s on the mark here. And the point here is that it’s sort of like if we had a big forest fire and we got a few buckets and you go ‘hey that didn’t put it out.’ Well, water’s not going to work. I mean we lost over a trillion dollars a year in annual demand. We tried to replace it with the stimulus that it came to from the federal sector about $300 billion a year, you subtract out the cuts at the state and local level, that’s $150 billion a year. Where I come from $150 billion isn’t going to make a loss of a trillion. That’s simple arithmetic.”

Originally posted here:
Kudlow, Forbes Debunk Krugman’s ‘Third Depression’ Call

Chris Matthews Disgracefully Uses Sen. Byrd’s Death To Bash Bush

It goes without saying that Monday’s media coverage of Sen. Robert Byrd’s (D-W.V.) death was predictably sycophantic on a disturbing number of levels. However, the award for most disgraceful use of a politician’s passing to further one’s agenda has to go to MSNBC’s Chris Matthews who ended last night’s “Hardball” memorializing a senator he had great esteem for by attacking former President George W. Bush. “Let me finish tonight with a tribute to a U.S. senator who shared my deep American objection to the Iraq War,” he began. Readers are cautioned that where Matthews went from here was offensive in the extreme (video follows with transcript and commentary):  CHRIS MATTHEWS: Let me finish tonight with a tribute to a U.S. senator who shared my deep American objection to the Iraq War. I love this country and believe in its historic greatness. I don`t know how those Founding Fathers found themselves in Philadelphia in the late 18th century but they did. And we are incredibly fortunate for that. And I love the symbol of the Gadsden flag that, coiled rattlesnake against a field of yellow. “Don`t Tread on Me` — it warned our enemies, and that included especially the British government and London. This morning, a man died who treasure this country and that flag. For those reasons, Senator Robert Byrd opposed both wars — both wars with Iraq. Here`s what he said in the fall of 2002: “For the first time in the history of the republic, the nation is considering a preemptive strike against a sovereign state. And I will not be silent.” And on the eve of that second Iraq War, he said, quote, “We proclaim a doctrine of preemption which is understood by few and feared by many. We saw that the United States — or we say that the United States has the right to turn its firepower on any corner of the globe which might be suspect in the war on terrorism. There is no credible evidence to connect Saddam Hussein to 9/11.” I was personally stunned and remain in awe that a president of George W. Bush`s abilities was able to take the attack on us of 9/11 and upturn two-plus centuries of American doctrine “Don`t Tread on Me.” We don`t attack but if you attack, we attack back. We oppose aggression. We are not the aggressors. Stop the tape! A president of George W. Bush`s abilities? What kind of nonsense is that? A man you admire dies, and that’s the occasion to mock a former President? How utterly disgraceful. But it got worse:  President Bush and his cohorts in and out of the government were able to construct a new doctrine: If we don`t like you or your policies we attack. If you cause trouble in your region, we attack. If we think you have WMD, we attack. Well, couldn’t that therefore apply to Woodrow Wilson and World War I? America was never attacked. And maybe Franklin Delano Roosevelt should be similarly excoriated for getting involved in Europe during World War II, for Germany never attacked us. Neither did Italy.  As such, using the Matthews Doctrine, we should only have attacked Japan after Pearl Harbor. And we never should have gone into Korea, Vietnam, or Iraq in 1991 for none of those countries attacked us either. Taking this further, Clinton never should have sent troops to Somalia in 1993, or Bosnia in 1995, or Kosovo in 1999. And he certainly shouldn’t have bombed Iraq in 1998. Add it all up, and in the past almost 100 years, Presidents Wilson, Roosevelt, Truman, Eisenhower, Kennedy, Johnson, Nixon, Reagan, Bush 41, and Clinton have all gone against the Matthews Doctrine. Yet, on the occasion of Sen. Byrd’s death, this so-called journalist chose to once again attack George W. Bush. And he wasn’t finished:  And millions went for it, hook, line and sinker. Senator Byrd did not. That he was so alone out there makes the swooning of America generally Bush`s war so frightening. If someone of Bush`s ability can make America forget its most basic, most time-honored standards, then imagine what a gifted demagogue could do. It`s one thing to send us off to Afghanistan, the base of those who hit us. Bush was able to then drive the entire country off to an altogether different direction. That`s what Bush did. Bush’s war?  Didn’t the Founding Fathers give Congress the sole responsibility to declare war? Why is it that shameless liberals like Matthews forget that in October 2002, both chambers of Congress debated giving Bush the authorization to invade Iraq if Saddam Hussein didn’t accede to various United Nations demands? And why is it that shameless liberals like Matthews forget that on October 10, 2002, the House approved the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution by a vote of 296 to 133? 81 Democrats voted “Yea” including Dick Gephardt, Jane Harmon, Steny Hoyer, John Murtha, and Henry Waxman.   And why is it that shameless liberals like Matthews forget that on October 11, 2002, the Senate approved the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution by a vote of 77 to 23? 29 Democrats voted “Yea” including Max Baucus, Evan Bayh, Joe Biden, John Breaux, Maria Cantwell, Max Cleland, Hillary Clinton, Tom Daschle, Chris Dodd, Byron Dorgan, John Edwards, Dianne Feinstein, Tom Harkin, John Kerry, Mary Landrieu, Joe Lieberman, Blanche Lincoln, Ben Nelson (Neb.), Bill Nelson (Fla.), Harry Reid, Jay Rockefeller, and Chuck Schumer.  As such, quite frankly, Americans like me are SICK AND TIRED of people like Matthews calling this Bush’s war!!!  And to use the occasion of a Senator’s death to do so is disgusting to say the least. The folks at General Electric must be so proud to not only have an employee like this, but a television network that encourages and celebrates such un-American behavior. Yes, I said un-American, because the Iraq War Resolution was passed with overwhelming bipartisan support in both chambers of Congress, and 75 percent of this nation approved of the invasion five months later. As such, WE THE PEOPLE went into this fight TOGETHER no matter how liberal media members like Matthews continue to shamefully depict it now. Will it ever stop? 

See the original post:
Chris Matthews Disgracefully Uses Sen. Byrd’s Death To Bash Bush

Hurricane alex 2010

Palm trees move in the wind as a man walks on the shore in Chetumal June 26, 2010. Tropical Storm Alex was likely to become a hurricane on Tuesday, delaying BP Plc#39;s efforts to increase siphoning capacity at the gushing oil leak in the Gulf of Mexico. Tropical Storm Alex was set to strengthen into a hurricane on Tuesday, delaying BP Plc#39;s efforts to increase siphoning capacity at the gushing oil well in the Gulf of Mexico where some companies evacuated workers. Alex was forecast to move

Read the original:
Hurricane alex 2010