Tag Archives: Breaking News

Tom Vitale and Valerie Bertinelli wedding

“We#39;ve both had good weddings [before],” Tom Vitale, 48, told us Monday at the New York premiere of Bertinelli#39;s TV Land show, Hot in Cleveland, which costars Betty White and airs Wednesday at 10 p.m. ET. “Now we want a good marriage.” They are in the midst of planning their wedding, but for Valerie Bertinelli and fiancé Tom Vitale creating the perfect ceremony isn#39;t high on their to-do list. So will it be a big over-the-top wedding or a more intimate affair? “It#39;s not about the pa

More here:
Tom Vitale and Valerie Bertinelli wedding

Seattle police beating girl video

“This officer was surrounded by an ever growing group that was starting to form. This could have been a tragedy,” says Rich O#39;Neill with the Seattle Police Officer#39;s Guild. O#39;Neill says this was an appropriate use of force. What could have been a mere jaywalking citation turned into a shoving match and ended with a Seattle Police Officer punching a 17-year-old girl in the face. With all the shouting going on it didn#39;t take long for a crowd to gather. “The officers are trained i

See more here:
Seattle police beating girl video

Defending the Indefensible: ABC’s Moran, Stephanopoulos Shill for Obama’s Gulf Address

Despite widespread criticism of President Barack Obama’s Oval Office address on the Gulf oil spill–including flak from MSNBC’s left-wing posse of Chris Matthews, Keith Olbermann, and Howard Fineman–ABC’s Terry Moran and George Stephanopoulos on the June 15 “Nightline” fawned over the president’s speech and ignored its obvious shortcomings. In recapping the address, Moran could not contain his adulation for Obama’s ability to assert his presidential authority and inspire the nation: “For the first time in the Oval Office, President Obama addressed the nation. A nation anxious and doubtful about his leadership on the environmental catastrophe that’s unfolded in the Gulf for 57 days. So, the main goal tonight, show the country he’s truly in charge.” “President Obama, who finished a two-day trip to the Gulf Coast this afternoon, clearly wanted to project power in his handling with the oil spill, and the most direct way to do that is to use the language of war of the commander-in-chief.” “As the cleanup efforts continue to grapple with the giant spill, residents all along the coast have grown more and more worried, more and more angry and the president spoke to that directly tonight, and he made a promise.” “At the end, like so many in the Oval Office before him, President Obama asked for prayers.” Moran praised Obama for taking charge of the Gulf, but failed to acknowledge critics who point out that the commander-in-chief dawdled for 57 days before addressing the nation. The “Nightline” anchor lauded Obama for engendering in Gulf Coast residents a sense of hope, but he ignored the cries of local fishermen who have criticized the president’s handling of the spill. Gushing like an uncapped oil well, Moran discarded journalistic integrity and reported only portions of the address he wanted his viewers to see. In contrast, NewsBusters reported that MSNBC’s liberal panel excoriated the president. Olbermann quipped, “Maybe I missed something. I thought it was a great speech if you’ve been on another planet for the last 57 days.” Matthews promised to “barf” if the president mentioned the Energy Secretary’s Nobel Prize again. Fineman lamented, “We want to explain how we`re going to clean up the Gulf. We want to talk about long-range goals. But this 15 or 16 or 17-minute speech really didn’t go into any of those things in detail.” After adorning Obama with plaudits, Moran brought on Stephanopoulos, a former Bill Clinton operative turned political correspondent, who made the unconscionable claim that Obama’s speech was brimming with detail. “First of all, this was the first time the president put all of the facts and figures and details to what he’s done in one place,” declared Stephanopoulos. “You know, 30,000 personnel, the ordering of 17,000 National Guards, men and women down to the area.” While the “Good Morning America” anchor quenched his thirst for a detailed plan of action, MSNBC’s liberal panel was starving for specifics. “Nothing. Nothing specific. Nothing specific at all,” bemoaned Olbermann. “Yeah, you said he aimed too low,” proclaimed Fineman. “I don’t think he was specific enough, Keith.” “[Energy legislation is] the hardest thing in the world, and he’s saying ‘I’m going to do it,’ and then no more information,” bellowed Matthews. Stephanopoulos also compared Obama’s address to FDR’s famous fireside chats, but that was a bridge too far even for Moran, who observed, “Franklin Roosevelt, those are big shoes to fill.” A transcript of the segment can be found below: ABC Nightline 6/15/10 12:39 a.m. TERRY MORAN: Just a few hours before President Obama made his first address to the nation from the Oval Office, a shocking new estimate was released of how much oil is gushing into the Gulf each day, up to 60,000 barrels, a number up roughly 200% over the original estimate. It was the latest reminder of how high the stakes are in this historic environment catastrophe. For the first time in the Oval Office… PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA: Good evening. MORAN: …President Obama addressed the nation. A nation anxious and doubtful about his leadership on the environmental catastrophe that’s unfolded in the Gulf for 57 days. So, the main goal tonight, show the country he’s truly in charge. OBAMA: Make no mistake. We will fight this spill with everything we’ve got for as long as it takes. We will make BP pay for the damage their company has caused. And we will do whatever is necessary to help the Gulf Coast and its people recover from this tragedy. MORAN: President Obama, who finished a two-day trip to the Gulf Coast this afternoon, clearly wanted to project power in his handling with the oil spill, and the most direct way to do that is to use the language of war of the commander-in-chief. OBAMA: Tonight, I’d like to lay out for you what our battle plan is going forward. I’ve authorized the deployment of over 17,000 National Guard members along the coast. The one answer I will not settle for is the idea that this challenge is somehow too big and too difficult to meet. You know, the same thing was said about our ability to produce enough planes and tanks in World War II. MORAN: As the cleanup efforts continue to grapple with the giant spill, residents all along the coast have grown more and more worried, more and more angry and the President spoke to that directly tonight, and he made a promise. OBAMA: The sadness and the anger they feel is not just about the money they’ve lost. It’s about a wrenching anxiety that their way of life may be lost. I refuse to let that happen. Tomorrow, I will meet with the chairman of BP and inform him that he is to set aside whatever resources are required to compensate the workers and business owners who have been harmed as a result of his company’s recklessness. And this fund will not be controlled by BP. MORAN: And typical of this president’s grand–some say grandiose ambitions, a call for a new national energy policy to reduce American dependence on fossil fuels. OBAMA: Now is the moment for this generation to embark on a national mission to unleash America’s innovation and seize control of our own destiny. MORAN: At the end, like so many in the Oval Office before him, President Obama asked for prayers. OBAMA: We pray for the people of the Gulf. And we pray that a hand may guide us through the storm towards a brighter day. Thank you, God bless you, and may God bless the United States of America. MORAN: And we’re joined by our Chief Political Correspondent and “Good Morning America” anchor George Stephanopoulos for his take on the President’s address. George, an Oval Office address to a nation that has had real doubts about President Obama’s leadership on this crisis. Did he do the job tonight in showing he can take charge? GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS, ABC chief political correspondent: I think he did what he needed to do, saying it, but I say that knowing full well that it’s not going to make a difference until we stop seeing that oil on our television and computer screens every day. I think the White House knows that, as well. I think one of the reasons the President decided to give the speech tonight is that they now believe what he did say in the speech, that within a couple of weeks, 90% of the oil coming out of that leak, it will be siphoned off, will be captured and they believe that will set the stage for future political gains and for getting this whole mess under control. MORAN: So, he was able to deliver that bit of news. But he said a lot of these kinds of things before in the various places he’s been talking about this. What else was new? What did we learn tonight from him? STEPHANOPOULOS: Well we–I think we learned a few things tonight. First of all, this was the first time the president put all of the facts and figures and details to what he’s done in one place. You know, 30,000 personnel, the ordering of 17,000 National Guards, men and women down to the area. What we did see new tonight is he named the head of restoration project for the Gulf, Secretary of the Navy Ray Mabus, a former governor of Mississippi, former ambassador to Saudi Arabia to come up with a restoration plan, which is critically important to the people of the Gulf. As the President said tonight, so many of them fear that they’re going to lose their entire way of life. We heard a new name for the head of that Minerals and Management Service, which has just been plagued, really by corruption, and by lax regulation of the industry. The President putting in a former prosecutor, Michael Bromwich. He has new men in place to help lead this effort. We also saw him come down pretty hard, as you might expect, on BP. On British Petroleum, saying he’s informing them they have to come up with this escrow fund, some in Congress calling for up to $20 billion. Now there is some question of whether President has the legal authority to do that. He’s just asserting it. MORAN: Let’s take a step back. It’s a historic moment in the Obama presidency. First Oval Office address to the nation. Optics. That’s a big word in the political class right now. How did he look up there? How do you think people received this moment of Barack Obama addressing from the Oval Office? STEPHANOPOULOS: You know, usually the public, especially those than tune in who tend to want to support the president anyway have a good reaction to these kinds of speeches, and they get all of his information unfiltered. Now for me it was just, you know, I’m not used to watching the president speak sitting down. You know, he gives so many of his big speeches standing up and I think that was a new way to look at the president. I think he was certainly reaching for the language of Oval Office addresses, all of these have military language–siege, assault on our shores, battle plan. White House aides tell me that the President was trying to recreate the feel of Franklin Roosevelt’s fireside chats because he wanted people to understand how serious this moment is. That said, I think all presidents are a little bit nervous going into their first Oval Office address. I think the President showed a little bit of that at the beginning as well. MORAN: Franklin Roosevelt, those are big shoes to fill. George Stephanopoulos, thanks very much for being with us tonight. –Alex Fitzsimmons is a News Analysis intern at the Media Research Center. Click here to follow him on Twitter.

See the rest here:
Defending the Indefensible: ABC’s Moran, Stephanopoulos Shill for Obama’s Gulf Address

CNBC Reporter Attacks Obama for Creating ‘His Own Sense of a Legal System’ over Oil Spill

There has been a lot of criticism hurled at President Obama over his handling of the BP oil spill. Some on the left are upset the president hasn’t been more forceful with the oil giant. Those on the right generally argue Obama’s leadership has been inadequate. Rarely has the president been criticized for specific actions on this issue. But on “Closing Bell” June 16 , CNBC’s Matt Nesto was asked whether BP acted appropriately by agreeing to the White House’s terms by cutting its dividend payments and agreeing to a $20 billion escrow account. Nesto argued that the administration was circumventing the legal system with such acts.  “I don’t think they [BP] had a [choice],” Nesto said. “In cutting the dividend or in joining up with that fund? I mean, cutting the dividend – yeah it is smart and prudent to save cash in the face of an unknown liability, but I’m very troubled by the fact, uh, that the President has once again created his own sense of, of a legal system.” Nesto cited previous instances where Obama has acted in an unprecedented ways to back up his claim and explained Obama was operating outside the presidency’s intended function. “He fired the CEO of General Motors. He circumvented the rights of bond holders in the GM situation and now he’s confiscated $20 billion from a private company – wait a minute – to set up, quote, ‘a financial and legal framework’ that already exists,” Nesto continued. “It’s not his job to create laws. It’s his job to enforce laws.” Although BP’s ability to stem the flow of the oil from the Deepwater Horizon well, the oil company has reacted to many of the government’s public requests, including suspending their dividend .  “They are doing that,” Nesto said. “Why do they have to have a gun to their head? There is a thing called due process my friends. There’s gonna be a lot of litigation, as there should, right?”

Perez Hilton Loses ABC Ads after Posting Miley Cyrus Upskirt Photo

ABC has pulled its ads from gossip blogger Perez Hilton’s Web site, PerezHilton.com, after he caught legal flack for posting upskirt photos of 17-year-old Disney star Miley Cyrus. However, several big-name companies still have ads running on the snarky blogger’s site. Amid speculation that Hilton may be slapped with kiddie-porn charges over the lurid photos, ABC has removed its ads for “The View” from the popular gossip site. But other advertisers appear to be sticking by Hilton. TV Land still had a full-page background promotion and two smaller ads on PerezHilton.com, and Apple iTunes and Microsoft’s search engine Bing still had advertisements up as of Wednesday afternoon. The drama started Monday, when Hilton posted a link to a photo of Cyrus getting out of a car in a tight white dress – and apparently, no underwear. Outrage erupted over the photo, with some calling the image “child pornography” since Cyrus is legally a minor. Hilton quickly removed the picture, but has brushed off the incident as a “fake” controversy. It’s odd that Microsoft, which owns Bing, would opt to keep advertising. It has recently been touting its own crusade against kiddie-porn. “These photos live on the Internet forever and every time they are shared or viewed, the children in them are re-victimized. It’s not enough to stop the perpetrators. The real point is getting these images off the Internet,” said Microsoft senior vice president Brad Smith at the company’s summit in late May. In 2009, Microsoft also donated a new technology to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children that finds hidden photos of child sexual exploitation on the internet. Microsoft uses the technology in its own search engine, Bing. In addition, Microsoft promotes its “fight against child pornography” on its website . Apple, which owns iTunes, has been ensnared in child porn scandals in the past. Last summer, the tech giant was forced to pull an iPhone application from its iTunes store after customers were using it to upload explicit images of minors. Hilton, who has used his gossip blog to become somewhat of a celebrity himself, is no stranger to controversy. The self-proclaimed “Queen of the media” was embroiled in scandal in 2009 when he served as a judge for the Miss U.S.A. pageant and asked finalist Carrie Prejean whether she supported same-sex marriage laws. Prejean said she believe marriage should be between a man and a woman, and Hilton slammed the beauty queen as prejudiced . The blogger later flamed the controversy on, calling Prejean a “dumb bitch” and saying her “awful, awful” answer “alienated so many people.” In June of 2009, Hilton posted a video blog in which he tearfully claimed to have been assaulted by Black Eyed Peas’ operation manager Polo Molina after the MuchMusic Video Awards. At the time of the alleged scuffle, Hilton called Black Eyed Peas member will.i.am a “faggot,” and he later told The Advocate that he had wanted to call the musician, who is black, the N-word instead. Last year, CMI reported on the cold reception Hilton received on ABC’s The View, after the show’s hosts criticized the blogger for posting provocative photos of Demi Moore’s 15-year-old daughter Rumer Willis.

Go here to see the original:
Perez Hilton Loses ABC Ads after Posting Miley Cyrus Upskirt Photo

NY Times Departing Public Editor Hoyt: We’re Not the Fox News of the Left

Clark Hoyt filed his last column as the New York Times’s Public Editor: ” A Final  Report From Internal Affairs, ” praising the cooperation of Times reporters and editors during his term and fending off accusations that the paper is a “liberal rag.” Hoyt admitted the editorial page and columnists are liberal and that the paper “shares the prevailing sensibilities of the city and region where it is published,” but denied the Times was “really the Fox News of the left,” citing scandalous scoops that hurt prominent Northeastern Democrats like New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer. Hoyt was the paper’s third public editor in an experiment that had its roots in the Jayson Blair catastrophe . In retrospect, the paper’s first ombudsman, Daniel Okrent, was probably the toughest critic of the paper’s reporting. Okrent famously asked the rhetorical question in a July 2004 column: ” Is the Times a liberal newspaper? Of course it is .” His successor Barney Calame was far too much a corporate yes-man; he initially defended the paper’s exposure a U.S. terrorist surveillance program involving international bank transfers, though he later recanted . Hoyt was somewhere in the middle, and perhaps the least predictable when it came to which controversies he considered worth writing about. Each of my predecessors, Daniel Okrent and Byron Calame, faced some degree of resistance from the newsroom, and I do not think anyone thought it would go down easy for me. On my first day on the job, Arthur Sulzberger Jr., the publisher, sat opposite me in a little room off his office, clapped his hands on his knees and said with a laugh: “Well, you’re here. You must be dumber than you look.” But my reception by the newsroom turned out to be accepting and unfailingly professional, in large part, I believe, because Okrent and Calame persevered, established the position and made it matter. Times journalists have been astonishingly candid, even when facing painful questions any of us would want to duck. Of course, journalists don’t relish being criticized in public any more than anyone else. A writer shaken by a conclusion I was reaching told me, if you say that, I’ll have to kill myself. I said, no, you won’t. Well, the writer said, I’ll have to go in the hospital. I wrote what I intended, with no ill consequences for anyone’s health. …. For all of my three years, I heard versions of Kevin Keller’s accusation: The Times is a “liberal rag,” pursuing a partisan agenda in its news columns. There is no question that the editorial page is liberal and the regular columnists on the Op-Ed page are heavily weighted in that direction. There is also no question that The Times, though a national newspaper, shares the prevailing sensibilities of the city and region where it is published. It does not take creationism or intelligent design as serious alternatives to the theory of evolution. It prints the marriages and commitment ceremonies of same-sex couples. It covers art and cultural events out on the edge. Hoyt next defended his paper’s balance by focusing on the Times breaking political scandals against Democrats in its backyard. While not quite denying the paper’s liberal slant, Hoyt said the Times was definitely not the Fox News of the left. But if The Times were really the Fox News of the left , how could you explain the investigative reporting that brought down Eliot Spitzer, New York’s Democratic governor; derailed the election campaign of his Democratic successor, David Paterson; got Charles Rangel, the Harlem Democrat who was chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, in ethics trouble; and exposed the falsehoods that Attorney General Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut, another Democrat, was telling about his service record in the Vietnam era? Of course, as the Times is always reminding us, the Republican Party has been decimated in the Northeast in recent years, meaning the region is dominated by Democrats, meaning most political scandals will involve Democrats. Hoyt also announced a new public editor from outside the paper would be named soon.

View post:
NY Times Departing Public Editor Hoyt: We’re Not the Fox News of the Left

Open Thread: ‘Three Reasons Obama Should Kick His Own Ass’

Nick Gillespie argues that the federal government bears much of the responsibility for the oil spill. Of course there is plenty of blame to go around. But let us not forget that it was the President who said mere months ago that “oil rigs today generally don’t cause spills.” What are your thoughts?

The rest is here:
Open Thread: ‘Three Reasons Obama Should Kick His Own Ass’

For Criticizing Obama, Barnicle ‘Castrated’ By Mika

Guess Mike could always get a gig with the Vienna Boys Choir . . . If MSNBC libs like Olbermann and Matthews were surprisingly critical of Pres. Obama’s speech last night, PBO can apparently count on one defender at the network: Mika Brzezinski.   So fiercely did Brzezinski go after Mike Barnicle on Morning Joe today for his criticism of the speech, that the panel agreed poor Mike had been “emasculated.”  Joe Scarborough took it a graphic step further, saying Mika had “castrated” the former Boston Globe columnist. All while protesting his “love” for the president, Barnicle did offer some stock criticism, saying PBO hadn’t been specific enough in addressing “the plight of ordinary Americans.”  That set Mika off.  Accusing him of speaking “drivel,” she continued her attack, heartfelt anger in her voice . . . MIKA BRZEZINSKI: My point is that it just seems that he can’t do anything right. And here he is, setting the path that you’re talking about, and now you’re criticizing it for it not being enough. And if he went out there and read like an encyclopedia, you guys would be saying [imitates male voice] “he’s a professor, it’s too much information.” Please.  Please. Seriously. It’s enough.  This is just drivel. I mean, come on: do you hear yourselves? Do you all hear yourselves?  It’s so knee-jerk. A bit later, the panel commented on poor Barnicle’s plight. JOE SCARBOROUGH: She tore you up. WILLIE GEIST: She tore you up. BRZEZINSKI: I haven’t even begun. SCARBOROUGH: She castrated you. Put the scalpel away! BRZEZINSKI: Would you stop? GEIST: That was downright mean. BRZEZINSKI: This is a morning show, and that is not acceptable.  That’s just wrong. SCARBOROUGH: Tina [Brown], was Barnicle not emasculated by Mika? TINA BROWN: Completely emasculated.  I mean, the guy is . . . SCARBOROUGH: It’s the end of men. BROWN: The end of men.  I’ve been holding his hand in the breaks here. GEIST: He’s been weeping quietly. SCARBOROUGH: Quivering.

Read the original here:
For Criticizing Obama, Barnicle ‘Castrated’ By Mika

Kobe Bryant wife picture

Kobe Bryant attracts so much hatred in the media as well as in the public eye. Among those leaping to feet in crowd at defensive stop: Vanessa Bryant. When Kobe#39;s layup gives Lakers 14-12 lead, V pumps fist skyward. Pau flattened Rondo, who was trying to set a screen. Ref Monty McCutchen gave the scooping “play on” gesture. Could be physical one. Lamar jacking his arms up to ask crowd for noise … and leads to Ron#39;s 3-pointer for 7-6 Lakers lead. Norv Turner saying hi to Christina Agu

View original post here:
Kobe Bryant wife picture

Cameron Diaz InStyle magazine 2010

The Knight and Day actress Cameron Diaz, 37, says she considers her family “the most important thing to me” – but she#39;s thrilled with her life just the way it is and doesn#39;t necessarily see kids in her future. Cameron Diaz is one of Hollywood#39;s most successful stars, but there#39;s one thing she admits she may never have a handle on: Parenthood. “I can be a pretty good aunt, but whether I#39;m a good aunt or a crappy aunt is really not remotely the same question as me being a good par

See the rest here:
Cameron Diaz InStyle magazine 2010