Tag Archives: business

Judd Apatow Working On Pee-Wee Herman Movie

‘Superbad’ boss will produce as-yet-untitled project starring and co-written by Pee-wee creator Paul Reubens. By Gil Kaufman Judd Apatow Photo: Michael Tran/FilmMagic In a perverse match made in movie-dude heaven, “Superbad” boss Judd Apatow is developing an as-yet-untitled Pee-wee Herman movie that will find the bow-tie-wearing ageless man-child going on a road trip built around a “gigantic adventure.” According to Variety , Apatow will produce, but not direct, the movie, which is being written by Pee-wee creator Paul Reubens along with “Inglorious Basterds” scriptwriter Paul Rust. “Let’s face it, the world needs more Pee-wee Herman,” Apatow told the magazine. “I am so excited to be working with Paul Reubens — who is an extraordinary and groundbreaking actor and writer. It’s so great to watch him return with such relevance.” The unlikely pair hooked up after Apatow attended one of Reubens’ recent string of “Pee-wee Herman Show” revival gigs in Los Angeles. After decades on the shelf, Reubens dusted off the show for a rabidly received run in January and February that also led to an upcoming 10-week booking on Broadway starting October 26. Reubens, who has sparingly rolled out the high-water Pee-wee gray suit and bowtie over the past 20 years in the wake of a 1991 arrest for indecent exposure at an adult theater in Florida, has slowly been making his way back into acting over the past decade. He’s made a number of cameos over the years, including spots on “Reno 911!” and a bit in the Raconteurs’ “Steady as She Goes” video, as well as stints on “30 Rock,” “Dirt,” “Chowder” and “Tim and Eric Awesome Show, Great Job!” “There is no one like Judd in our business — he loves comedy with emotion and heart, and he sees what we do as art,” said Reubens, whose big-screen debut in “Pee-wee’s Big Adventure” was handled by none other than “Alice in Wonderland” director Tim Burton in his feature directing debut. “I can’t believe I’m getting this opportunity to be working with him.” It will be the first Pee-wee big-screen adventure since 1988’s sequel, “Big Top Pee-wee.” As if the Apatow-Reubens collabo isn’t enough for freaks and geeks to get excited about, Variety also reported that IFC is going to air two of Apatow’s early series, “Freaks and Geeks” and “Undeclared,” with “Freaks” — featuring then-little-known actors James Franco, Seth Rogen, Jason Segel and Linda Cardellini — slated to start rolling out on Friday (July 2) and “Undeclared” slated for the fall, complete with unaired episodes. For breaking news, celebrity columns, humor and more — updated around the clock — visit MTVMoviesBlog.com .

See more here:
Judd Apatow Working On Pee-Wee Herman Movie

9-11 Ring A Bell? Donny Doesn’t Remember Why We Went Into Afghanistan

How clueless can a guy who lives in Manhattan possibly be?   Discussing the Afghanistan war on Morning Joe, Donny Deutsch claimed “people weren’t clear why we were there in the first place.” Uh, Donny . . . Fortunately, the ever-affable Willie Geist was there to diplomatically offer Deutsch a brief history lesson. WILLIE GEIST: Well, it was clear in the first months after 9-11. Remember, Donny?  That little piece of the Manhattan skyline puzzle that’s missing?  The Taliban regime in Afghanistan that harbored al Qaeda members who plotted it?  Hello?

Link:
9-11 Ring A Bell? Donny Doesn’t Remember Why We Went Into Afghanistan

WaPo Slams BP Spending, Accepts $455K in Full-Page Ads

The Washington Post and BP may seem like the oddest couple since Felix and Oscar, but they’ve been spending a lot of time – and money – together. A Business & Media Institute study found that the Washington Post earned up to $455,652 on 17 BP ads during the month of June, or about $15,188.40 per day. All 17 ads were a full page in size, nine appeared on the back page, six ran in color, and three ran on Sundays. In short, that’s a fairly high-end ad campaign. However, companies typically receive discounts off of the open rate for large ad buys or for long-term contracts, so that final total may well be lower. BMI analyzed all 30 issues of the Post in the month of June and calculated the rates using the Post’s 2010 General Ad Rates Position Premiums . Based on the position premiums, a back page ad costs $28,954 daily ($31,456 on Sundays), ads on pages A2, A3, and A5 cost $208 daily ($216) per column inch, and other specified pages cost $103 daily ($110) per column inch. full page ad is 6 x 21 inches or 126 inches. BP back page ads totaled $260,586 and the Sunday ads, which appeared on pages A5 and A15 respectively, totaled $103,716, with color costs included in premium pricing. While advertising is the lifeblood for newspapers, it’s ironic that the Post has earned so much money from a company it has criticized over the past month, including their most recent June 30 story about BP’s corporate contributions. While reporter Carol D. Leonnig fretted about BP spending $112,000 on the national election cycle, her employer received over four times as much in one month, and BP nearly spent that much in the Sunday ads alone. Furthermore, Leonning griped about the $4.8 million BP spent over seven years. There are 84 months in seven years, which means BP spent $57,142.86 per month in corporate contributions, nearly eight times less than what it spent in one month on Washington Post ads. The media gleefully reported President Obama’s anger at BP’s new ad campaign and if BP spent this much money advertising with a conservative publication, the media may well have played the Republican-big-business-connection card. While the Post has a history of liberal positions, including being anti-business and advocating everything from Value-Added Taxes (VAT) to gay rights and environmentalism . But when it comes to earning money, the Post is laughing all the way to the bank.

Read this article:
WaPo Slams BP Spending, Accepts $455K in Full-Page Ads

Lindsay Lohan Sued, Accused of Premeditated Fraud

She’ll probably claim she was set up, or they’re not her shoes, or Eleonore Lieven did it, or some such nonsense, but a lawsuit alleges Lindsay Lohan concocted a plan to defraud an L.A. boutique out of thousands of dollars in … shoes. Church, which sells expensive clothes, jewelry, and accessories, claims the train wreck shopped at the store between November 2009-February 2010. According to the suit, Lindsay Lohan racked up a bill of $17,060.83 and convinced the owners that her business manager would be paying the bill . The business manager paid a grand total of $180. Lock your doors, boutique owners. [Photo: PacificCoastNewsOnline.com] The lawsuit, which will be filed in L.A. County Superior Court, alleges LiLo “had no intention of causing her business manager to pay the entire balance.” Amusingly, and unfortunately for the plaintiffs, the suit claims the owners relied on her “well known status as a movie actress with substantial income.”

Angelina Jolie Talks ‘Mr. & Mrs. Smith’ Sequel, Brad Pitt

‘Do we have kids in the movie?’ the star wonders to Vanity Fair. ‘If we work on it, we pull from our own life.’ By Jocelyn Vena Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie in “Mr. & Mrs. Smith” Photo: 20th Century Fox In the years since Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt met on the set of the high-octane action flick “Mr. & Mrs. Smith,” the pair have gone on to work on a spate of critically acclaimed films. Of course, they’ve also created a life for themselves offscreen, raising a brood of six together and traveling the world on a variety of philanthropic projects. So, is Hollywood’s sexiest A-list couple ready for a sequel? “People have tried. And it’s strange: Do we have kids in the movie?” Angelina Jolie considered in an interview with Vanity Fair. “We’ve thought about that, but it becomes personal now that we actually have kids. And if we work on it, we pull from our own life, which is funny to us, but you feel strange sharing too much,” Jolie said in the magazine’s August issue. “We did ask somebody to look into ‘Mr. & Mrs.’ to see if they could crack a sequel, but there wasn’t anything original. It was just, ‘Well, they’re going to get married, or they’ve got kids, or they get separated.’ Never great,” she added. But even if the chances of a sequel to the 2005 flick seem slim, Jolie said she’d be game to team up with partner Pitt for another project. “I’d love to. We’ve talked about it. We’d have to figure out who’s going to watch the kids, but it’s really about finding the right thing, because we’ve looked,” she explained. “When you’re a couple, there are certain things people don’t want to see you do. It becomes too indulgent, too personal. I don’t think people want to see people who are really together intimate onscreen.” Jolie, however, had an idea about how to avoid filmgoers’ tendency to reject some real-life couples hooking up onscreen (see: Jennifer Lopez and Ben Affleck circa “Gigli”). “Maybe we have to play bad guys that try to kill each other,” said the actress, whose “Salt” arrives in theaters July 23 . “So it’s just fun and aggressive, not dealing with some man-woman deal.” Do you think Brad and Angelina should team up on the big screen again? Tell us in the comments! Check out everything we’ve got on “Salt.” For breaking news, celebrity columns, humor and more — updated around the clock — visit MTVMoviesBlog.com . Related Photos Pitt, Jolie, Lohan, More At “Mr. And Mrs. Smith” Premiere, 06.07.05 “Mr. And Mrs. Smith” photos

Go here to read the rest:
Angelina Jolie Talks ‘Mr. & Mrs. Smith’ Sequel, Brad Pitt

Dr. Dre ‘Didn’t Even Get A Chance To Finish’ Leaked Song ‘Under Pressure’

The Doc laments online leak: ‘It’s just one of the things we have to deal with in the business today.’ By Mawuse Ziegbe Dr. Dre Photo: MTV News Dr. Dre fans got a taste of his long-awaited Detox LP a couple of weeks ago when “Under Pressure,” a track featuring Doc collaborator Jay-Z , leaked online . Too bad it wasn’t the real deal. The next day, Dre released a statement saying that the track was “incomplete” and that “when it’s ready, you’ll be hearing it from me.” Recently, the beatmaking legend further explained that the leaked song was still in its early stages and lacked Dre’s renowned polish. “I didn’t even get a chance to finish the record,” Dre told HardKnock.tv in a video interview at the ASCAP Rhythm and Soul Music Awards on Friday. The hitmaking icon, who was honored with the society’s Founders Award , said that a lot of work still remained on the version of the hotly-anticipated collabo that hit the web. “The vocals are real rough, it’s not blended right … a hook is not even on the song. It’s not done. The music isn’t done.” Dre, who was being honored for his game-changing career, also lamented the reality of digital leaks that the music industry must now contend with. “It’s just like one of the things that we have to deal with today in the business,” Dre said. “Because of technology and the Internet and all that, it’s like, real easy for somebody to steal your sh–. What can you do?” However, Dre remains focused on the task at hand and said that he planned to hit the lab after collecting his award that night. “I’m leaving this event, going right to the studio, I’m gettin’ it crackin,'” said Dre. The Doc said he’s looking to get Detox to fans by the end of 2010 and is working to make sure that it’s worth the wait. “[I’m] trying to put it out by the end of the fall. Trying to give everybody what they’ve been waitin’ for and make sure they’re not disappointed; that’s all I’m doing.” What do you think of “Under Pressure”? Sound off in the comments below! Related Artists Dr. Dre Jay-Z

Originally posted here:
Dr. Dre ‘Didn’t Even Get A Chance To Finish’ Leaked Song ‘Under Pressure’

Fergie’s Got Breasts I Can Appreciate

Earlier today I had pictures of Fergie’s tight little ass in a sweet pair of spandex while she went for a jog, so I thought it was only fair to give her breast the attention they deserve. Here she is at the BET Awards showing us just how impressive her boobs can be. She’s been in this business for a while now so it’s nice to see that she knows how to highlight her good qualities and cover up the nastiness with a giant pair of sunglasses. Nice. more pictures of Fergie here

VIDEO: Media Routinely Used ‘Conservative’ Label on Bush Nominees to Supreme Court; Obama Picks Always ‘Centrist’

When President Bush nominated John Roberts and Samuel Alito to the Supreme Court in 2005, the media did not hesitate to describe both men as “very conservative,” but when President Obama nominated Sonia Sotomayor in 2009 and Elena Kagan this year many in the press couldn’t seem to identify any liberal ideology. The Media Research Center has produced a video compilation of examples to further demonstrate the obvious double standard. [Audio available here ] During ABC’s live special coverage of Roberts’s nomination on July 19, 2005, then This Week host and former Democratic operative George Stephanopoulos declared: “This is a very conservative man with a strong paper trail that proves it.” NPR’s Nina Totenberg could hardly contain her urge to label, using the word “conservative” several times during a July 23 appearance on Inside Washington: “John Roberts is a really conservative guy…he’s a conservative Catholic….[President Bush] has given conservatives a hardline conservative.” The same labeling followed Alito’s nomination months later. CBS’s Bob Schieffer opened the October 31 Evening News by proclaiming: “Conservatives wanted a conservative on the Supreme Court, and said the President ought to risk a fight in the Senate to get one. Their wishes have been fulfilled.” Later that evening, on a special 7PM ET hour edition of CNN’s The Situation Room, anchor Wolf Blitzer described: “…there is a new nomination and new controversy. A battle shapes up as the president picks a staunch conservative who could help reshape the U.S. Supreme Court.” Compare those characterizations of Roberts and Alito with how Stephanopoulos introduced Sotomayor to Good Morning America viewers on May 1, 2009: “She’s built up a strong centrist record on the court.” On the May 27 CBS Evening News, anchor Katie Couric scratched her head when it came to Sotomayor’s political views: “Now pundits usually label judges as either liberal or conservative, but that won’t be easy with Judge Sotomayor.” Meanwhile, Totenberg actually remained consistent, arguing Obama’s nominee was actually on the Right: “…she’s more conservative than some members of the Supreme Court, including Justice Scalia, perhaps.” With Kagan, on CBS’s April 11 Face the Nation, legal analyst Jan Crawford described the broad support the potential nominee would receive: “…she’s got some support among conservatives because she hired a lot of those conservative law professors at Harvard.” On the May 10 Good Morning America, ABC World News anchor Diane Sawyer explained how Kagan “is expected to play a role as somewhat of a conciliator, the bridge across the conservative and liberal wings of the Court.” Like Totenberg with Sotomayor, on the May 11 CBS Early Show co-host Maggie Rodriguez floated the idea that Kagan was conservative: “she may actually shift the Court to the Right, compared with Justice Stevens.”      As evidence of Kagan’s staunch liberalism comes out in her confirmation hearings, one wonders if the media will finally be willing to accurately describe her left-wing views.

The rest is here:
VIDEO: Media Routinely Used ‘Conservative’ Label on Bush Nominees to Supreme Court; Obama Picks Always ‘Centrist’

David Weigel Explains Away Journolist E-mails by Claiming to be a Jerk

Former Washington Post writer David Weigel has attempted to explain away his Journolist e-mails attacking conservatives by claiming he was a trash-talking thoughtless jerk. If you think that self-damnation was bad, at least it was much better than admitting something even closer to the truth which would be that he deviously allowed people to think of him as a conservative. In fact, he is still lamely making that conservative claim in his Big Journalism article but first the jerk confession: …I treated the list like a dive bar, swaggering in and popping off about what was “really” happening out there, and snarking at conservatives. Why did I want these people to like me so much? Why did I assume that I needed to crack wise and rant about people who, usually for no more than five minutes were getting on my nerves? Because I was stupid and arrogant, and needlessly mean… Unfortunately, Weigel proved that he still remains a jerk by continuing to claim that he was somehow conservative: I interned at the libertarian Center for Individual Rights in the summer of 2001. I supported the Iraq War and crashed an anti-war protest on my campus. I voted in Republican primaries in 2002 and 2004. (Since I was in Illinois, I voted in 2004 for Jack Ryan to get the GOP’s nomination for Senate, to oppose Barack Obama. I’m better off than one of those guys.) Weigel still tries to convince us of his one-time conservative credentials despite the fact that in the three presidential elections since 2000 he voted for Nader, Kerry, and Obama. Gee! What a “conservative!” Despite his pretend conservatism, Weigel just can’t seem to understand why people think he has misrepresented himself: Still, this was hubris. It was the hubris of someone who rose — objectively speaking — a bit too fast, and someone who misunderstood a few things about his trade. It was also the hubris of someone who thought the best way to be annoyed about something was to do it publicly. This is the reason I’m surprised at commentary accusing me of misrepresenting myself. Except that liberal Journolist was supposed to be private and Weigel wrote there in the expectation that it would remain so. Dave’s misrepresentation mode continues. 

Read more here:
David Weigel Explains Away Journolist E-mails by Claiming to be a Jerk

Once Again, ‘Many Peaceful’ = ‘Some Violent’ When It Comes to Leftist Protesters in the NY Times

Violent protesters set fire to police cars and shattered store-front windows at the Group of 20 economic summit in Toronto this weekend. How did the New York Times, so skittish about the hypothetical threat of non-existent Tea Party violence from the right, react to actual violence committed by political protesters by the left-wing and anarchist groups? With more snort-worthy apologias for left-wing protesters being overwhelmingly “peaceful” in numerical terms Reporter Randal Archibold made a similar claim in his April 24 story from Phoenix at a protest against Arizona’s anti-immigration law, claiming that “hundreds of demonstrators massed, mostly peacefully, at the capitol plaza.” Local news in Phoenix reported three people were arrested during the immigration rally, including two seen throwing water bottles at police, and videos showed more lawlessness on display. The same defensive tone is present in Monday’s Business section story from Toronto, with the ludicrous headline ” Police in Toronto Criticized for Treatment of Protesters, Many Peaceful ,” by Ian Austen. Austen’s story is illustrated with a photo from the European Pressphoto Agency showing two policemen arresting a woman, but not photos shown elsewhere of burning cars, like the Associated Press photo by Frank Gunn above. Austen managed to fault the police both for initial passivity and subsequent overreaction: An escalation of aggressive police tactics toward even apparently peaceful protests at the Group of 20 summit meeting led to calls for a review of security activities . After allowing a small group of people to burn police cars and smash windows unimpeded on Saturday afternoon, many of the 20,000 police officers deployed in Toronto changed tactics that evening and during the last day of the gathering. There was a notable increase in both the numbers of police officers who surrounded demonstrations as well as more use of tear gas and rubber or plastic bullets. At the same time, there was a visible drop in the number of demonstrators in the city streets. As a result, the violence by some demonstrators that marred the opening of the Group of 20 meeting did not reappear on Sunday, and more than 600 people were arrested Saturday and Sunday. The Times seemed to miss the obvious connection: More police and more arrests = less crime. It’s one the Times has missed before, most notoriously in this headline from September 28, 1997: ” Crime Keeps On Falling; but Prisons Keep On Filling .” Unlike Archibold’s Arizona coverage, Austen didn’t ignore the violence on display in Toronto, though he did offer the same ludicrous apologia to this group of left-wing protesters that Archibold did to the ones in Arizona, writing that ” the overwhelming majority…were peaceful .” The violence was not exceptional compared with problems at previous international meetings, like the World Trade Organization’s gathering in Seattle in 1999 . Toronto’s shopping district sustained the greatest damage but quickly became something of a tourist attraction. But it was nevertheless extraordinary for Toronto, a city with little history of violent protests. David Miller, the city’s mayor, was among the many who swiftly condemned it. “Does today send signals about Toronto that I wish weren’t sent?” he said on Saturday evening. “Absolutely.” …. William Blair, the city’s police chief, did not respond directly to the widespread criticism over the lack of police response during the period of violence. But at a news conference, he suggested that officers were deliberately held back. The protesters, the overwhelming majority of whom were peaceful , promoted a variety of causes. Many were challenging the legitimacy of the Group of 20 and proposing that governments work through the United Nations. Others championed specific issues, particularly in relation to human rights and the environment.

Link:
Once Again, ‘Many Peaceful’ = ‘Some Violent’ When It Comes to Leftist Protesters in the NY Times