Tag Archives: cases-the-local

Cramer Rips Federal Gov’t for Congressman’s 1,000-2,000 Dow Drop Prediction: ‘Washington Has Decided to Eviscerate Profits’

On CNBC’s June 29 broadcast “Power Lunch,” Rep. Paul Kajorski, D-Pa. made a pretty prediction about the Dow Jones Industrial Average ( DJIA ) should Congress be unable to pass financial regulation legislation. [Video Available Here ] “You know, I wish every one of them would ask the question and also the industry and media, what happens in this country if this bill fails?” Kanjorski said. “Do you think 236 points down on the Dow is surprising? Check 1,000 or 2,000 points if we fail to change the ways that caused this problem.” That caught the attention of CNBC’s Erin Burnett, who played the clip for “Mad Money” host Jim Cramer. Cramer blasted Kanjorski and the entire institution of the federal government for being a drag on the markets for a myriad of reasons on his June 29 “Stop Trading” segment of CNBC’s “Street Signs.” “You know, they are the problem,” Cramer said. “And we all know it, right? It’s like let’s not even outthink it. I love our bureaucrat congressmen in Washington, but they’re the problem. And I don’t want to be just Mr. Rick Santelli here, but give me a break.” Cramer noted the timing – on the eve of a financial regulation bill vote and asked why he was waiting until now to tell us. “I mean, really – so he’s telling us about the 2,000 points? Now he’s telling us?” Cramer continued. “I mean, like other than a couple of congressmen and senators.” But according to Cramer, things are much more dire than the Washington, D.C. political playbook. He explained there was a real problem with the mentality in the federal government – to demonize profits. “What is the 10-year telling us?” Cramer continued. “We’re done. It’s 1934. I’ve been saying over and over on the show – the market’s overvalued, the market’s overvalued. Just try to buy a yield. It’s because, you know – we’ve had it. Washington has decided to eviscerate profits. No one wants to say this because what happens when you say it, is you got a bullseye on your back and I don’t even feel like saying it because I already have a ton of them. But you know it really is – I mean to like listen to Congress tell us about what causes a 2,000-point decline and then just accept it and say, ‘Yeah, that’s interesting.’ I’m not playing that game. I’m too old.” Cramer said the problem was very complicated with what he said was a deflationary phenomenon. He explained there were very few positives with the S&P 500 index to point at what he deemed “gloom-busters.” “We have radical deflation in this country,” Cramer said. “I mean, that’s what it is. People are maybe working, earning money off the books. I’m doing a series on the show. I’m trying to find companies that are gloom-busters. I gave combed most of the S&P 500, some of the S&P 600, you know the next level. I’ve got about four or five companies that say things are good. I mean, this is a remarkable time in the American economy. This market deserves to go down. Now I know a lot of people will say, ‘Wait a second, it just rallied from 270.’ We’ve all played that game. We know what happens – the ultra-funds come in in the last half hour, they rebalance – you go down 500 in the last minute. Maybe it’s our fault. It’s our fault because of TARP or … whatever.”

Link:
Cramer Rips Federal Gov’t for Congressman’s 1,000-2,000 Dow Drop Prediction: ‘Washington Has Decided to Eviscerate Profits’

Arizona Writer Latest Journalist to Pass Through Media-Democrat Revolving Door

Investigative journalist John Dougherty of Arizona deserves a hand from everyone concerned with liberal media bias, because he has given it up. Dougherty, pictured right in a photo from his website, has, shall we say, crossed the border from being biassed to seeking the Democratic nomination for US Senate . In the late 80’s he was involved with uncovering Charles Keating’s use of campaign contributions to five senators-including John McCain, whom Dougherty would most likely face in an election-in exchange for putting pressure on banking regulators. He also investigated Governor Fife Symington, polygamist leader Warren Jeffs and Sherrif Joe Arpaio. Whatever else he has done in the past, Dougherty has already succesfully morphed into a politician, writing a blog for the Huffington Post on illegal immigration and its relationship to crime that directly contradicts the conclusions he reached in an article he wrote for the High County News. Dougherty told Jilted Journalists that, if elected, he would hire investigative reporters as his staff to investigate other politicians and that he “can’t wait to hold hearings at the US Senate.” He also said that he shares much of the Tea Party’s frustration with government, although “‘Government is not the problem, corrupt government is the problem,’ he said, blaming lobbyist spending for putting corporations and special interests ahead of people. Government needs to be ‘much more aggressive,’ ‘strong,’ and ‘tough,’ he said.” If elected, Dougherty would join a long line of journalists who sought public office: Senators Harry F. Byrd (both Senior and Junior), President Warren Harding, Clare Boothe Luce, Pat Buchanan, Steve Forbes, William Randolph Hearst and even McCain’s challenger in the Arizona Republican Primary, JD Hayworth. As one of the most famous journalists ever to run for public office, Dave Barry once wrote: “And of course the most agonizing question is: Why, really, do I WANT to be president? Is it just so that I can have a limousine and a helicopter and a big plane and a huge staff of boot-licking lackeys waiting on me hand and foot? Yes.” That just about sums up the attraction of journalists to politics.

Read more:
Arizona Writer Latest Journalist to Pass Through Media-Democrat Revolving Door

Georgetown Law-educated Bonnie Erbe Blusters Nonsense About Supreme Court Ruling on Gun Rights

Given that our tax dollars are subsidizing her salary, is it too much to expect PBS’s Bonnie Erbe to have at least some intelligent command of the issues of the day? On second thought, don’t answer that. In her latest blogging misadventure at USNews.com, the “To the Contrary” host portrayed yesterday’s 5-4 ruling in McDonald v. City of Chicago as a blow to “local rights” : The Supreme Court’s decision , taking away important local rights to control gun ownership, marks another sad day in America’s now seemingly endless political appetite for increasing the number of privately owned guns in this country. By 5-4 the justices overturned strict gun ownership rules set by Chicago and one of its suburbs. Perhaps the general lethargy that has caused many Americans to lose faith in government has crept into our philosophy on law and order, feeling hopelessly that even our local police and sheriffs can no longer protect us from harm. Vigilantism reigns supreme and with it a misinterpretation of the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution that the powerful gun ownership lobby has interpreted to mean anyone can essentially own any weapon or weapons of any caliber. Of course the Court’s rulings in both McDonald and Heller dealt simply with the most extreme of liberal gun control schemes: complete bans on gun ownership by the cities of Chicago and Washington, D.C. In both cases the local authorities grossly overstepped the boundaries of their authority by infringing on the right of the people to keep and bear arms. Far from taking away a legitimate power of government, the Supreme Court’s rulings were corrective actions to stop governmental abuse of individual liberties. What’s more, these rulings do not mean the Court has or intends to consider any and all gun control legislation to be illegitimate, just as the First Amendment doesn’t mean one has a right to yell “Fire!” in a crowded theater, to propagate libelous speech, or to burn a cross on someone’s lawn in an effort to intimidate him. Erbe, a Georgetown Law grad , most certainly knows that, yet she still elected to hack out hyperbolic drivel instead of at least attempt to present a cogent liberal case for why she believes the Court is off the mark.

View original post here:
Georgetown Law-educated Bonnie Erbe Blusters Nonsense About Supreme Court Ruling on Gun Rights