Tag Archives: Celebrities

Coming to MTV: Teen Mom 2!

Move over, Maci Bookout . Step aside, Catelynn Lowell. Time to make room, Farrah Abraham. Cool your jets, Amber Portwood. Please don’t hurt us. MTV will premiere Teen Mom 2, a sequel to the smash hit reality show, on Tuesday, January 11. Get ready for so much more baby-raising drama. “Teen Mom 2 is shooting right now,” the show’s executive producer, Morgan J. Freeman, told USA Today , confirming the sequel’s debut on MTV. The Teen Mom cast became pseudo-celebrities after their trials and tribulations aired this year. Dr. Drew has nothing to do with this, he’s just in the photo . Who are the new girls? Although the cast list hasn’t yet been revealed, the featured young women were selected from the current cast of 16 and Pregnant . As for original cast members Maci Bookout, Catelynn Lowell, Farrah Abraham and Amber Portwood , running it back for a new season, Freeman wasn’t sure. “We’re doing some continuous-type shooting with the original [cast] but nothing’s been announced yet about what we’ll do with that,” the producer said. What do you think? Ready for Teen Mom 2?

View post:
Coming to MTV: Teen Mom 2!

Audrina Patridge Sizes Up ‘Dancing With The Stars’ Rivals

‘I know Brandy’s very driven,’ she tells MTV News of one fellow dancer. By Jocelyn Vena Audrina Patridge and Tony Dovolani on “Dancing with the Stars” Photo: Adam Larkey/ABC Audrina Patridge may have tackled the cha-cha on last week’s “Dancing With the Stars,” but now the former “Hills” star is ready to take things up a couple of notches when she hits the stage for this week’s challenge: the quickstep. “I’m taking in everything the judges told me, [and] I’m using that as motivation to become a better dancer,” she told MTV News about her second week on the show. “We’re going to start on the quickstep and push the limits.” Patridge and her “DWTS” partner, Tony Dovolani, think the judges will be impressed by their dance moves and the beauty of the dance. “It’s really pretty,” Patridge said. “Tony’s shaving his legs for it!” Last week, fans said goodbye to David Hasselhoff , but that still leaves quite a few celebrities as Patridge’s competition. “I think everyone’s really good. I know Brandy’s very driven; she wants to win really bad. She’s really good,” she said. “Jennifer Grey is really good too. Rick Fox is good. Kyle [Massey] is hilarious. It’s really not that competitive. Everyone’s really supportive of each other. We bonded.” Patridge, however, isn’t the only MTV star burning up the dance floor every week, but she said there’s no beef between her and “Jersey Shore” star Mike “The Situation” Sorrentino . “I talked to Mike. He’s a real sweet guy. Watching ‘Jersey Shore,’ that’s not him at all,” she shared. “He’s so sweet and nice and funny.” While Patridge lives to dance another week, her main focus is making sure she gets the quickstep just right. “I’m feeling relieved and happy, and I can’t wait to get back into the studio and start learning the quickstep,” she said. “Tony showed me some of the steps last week. Now we’re really going to work hard and focus on that dance only. “It’s very different than the cha-cha,” she continued. “The quickstep is very fast. It’s challenging in a different way.” Who are you rooting for on “Dancing With the Stars”? Let us know in the comments! Related Photos ‘Dancing With The Stars’ Season 11 Cast Revealed!

See more here:
Audrina Patridge Sizes Up ‘Dancing With The Stars’ Rivals

Good News from Uganda: Animal Populations Soaring in National Parks Thanks to Anti-Poaching Efforts

Elephants and impalas are both doing well in Uganda. Photo by frederic.salein via Flickr. In 1999, poaching had reduced the number of impalas, a type of grazing antelope, in Uganda to just 1,600 animals. Today, there are more than 35,000 — and populations of many other species have soared as well, thanks to successful efforts to reduce the amount of poaching in the country’s protected areas…. Read the full story on TreeHugger

See more here:
Good News from Uganda: Animal Populations Soaring in National Parks Thanks to Anti-Poaching Efforts

Bill Clinton Drops Meat, Dairy, and 24 Pounds

Image Credit: sskennel via Flickr Former President Bill Clinton, reputed for his legendary consumption of snack foods , has made a surprise move. In an effort to drop weight before his daughter Chelsea’s (vegan) wedding , the father of the bride gave up meat and dairy products,

Read more here:
Bill Clinton Drops Meat, Dairy, and 24 Pounds

Dairy Industry Says Its Greenhouse Gas Emissions Lower Than Previously Reported: 2% of US Total

photo: www.bluewaikiki.com via flickr Let’s take it as given that considering the flack dairy gets from segments of the green community for its environmental problems that this result is probably what the Innovation Center for US Dairy wanted, and move on: According to a new calculation of the carbon footprint of a gallon of milk in the United States, the emissions of the dairy industry are 2% of the nation’s total, lower than previous studies have shown,

Go here to read the rest:
Dairy Industry Says Its Greenhouse Gas Emissions Lower Than Previously Reported: 2% of US Total

The 7 Best Green Initiatives From Bill Clinton’s 2010 Summit

Photo via CGI 2010 The Clinton Global Initiative is a gathering of heads of state, businesses, activists, celebrities, and nonprofits from around the world that’s designed to foster progress through “commitments” — binding vows to back projects dedicated to the greater good. Commitments focus on everything from health to empowering women and girls. And every year, there’s a strong focus on sustainability and the environment. The often exceedingly well-funded projects announced this year… Read the full story on TreeHugger

Read this article:
The 7 Best Green Initiatives From Bill Clinton’s 2010 Summit

Did Lady Gaga Have Any Impact On ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ Vote?

In spite of DADT vote stalling in Senate, supporters of repeal say Gaga’s tireless advocacy has garnered issue global recognition. By Gil Kaufman Lady Gaga speaks in in Portland, Maine on Monday Photo: Cliff Kucine/ Getty Images There are many different ways for celebrities to leverage their notoriety to help a cause. They can play a concert, write a check, make a PSA or, as in the case of actor Sean Penn, live in a meager tent in an earthquake-ravaged country for six months and run their own relief organization. But few stars have given as much in as short a time as Lady Gaga has to the cause of repealing the U.S. military’s “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy. “The reality is that on Saturday night we were looking at what we could do on Monday, knowing that even if we sent out an alert to our base of 80,000 supporters, we’d be talking to the same people,” said Trevor Thomas, spokesperson for the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network, a national organization dedicated to ending DADT. “We wanted to expand our reach and reach more people nationally and, more than anything, the two swing senators [in Maine] who could give us a chance.” The SLDN quickly hatched a plan to organize a rally in Maine on Monday in an attempt to get swing-vote Republican Senators Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins to possibly change their votes on the repeal. That’s where Lady Gaga came in. The pop icon had walked the white carpet at the VMAs with four SLDN members, shouted them out from the stage, turned her website over to the issue and posted public video pleas about the issue. When word came of this last-minute appeal, once again, she stepped up. According to Thomas, the singer finished a show in Raleigh, North Carolina, on Sunday night, hopped on a bus and took a 15-hour ride to Maine, personally writing her address on the way. “The dedication from her was amazing,” he said. “She wrote the speech, did the research and talked to people, and it did exactly what we need to do — highlight the issue to young people and others who might not have heard about this cause. But most importantly, we did it in this key area we needed it in.” The Gaga speech garnered massive local and national coverage for the issue, with stories in the Denver Post, USA Today and The New York Times, among others. “You can work for months to place one story in the Times’ print section, and even if politics prevail and we lose the vote, more people know about the DADT repeal than did yesterday,” Thomas said. And while Gaga’s mighty push to lock in the necessary votes didn’t save the day when the crucial Senate vote took place on Tuesday (September 21), Thomas said her help undoubtedly had a huge impact and put a global spotlight on the policy. From the night Gaga first spoke out on the repeal at the 2010 VMAs and redirected traffic from her official website to the SLDN site until 8 a.m. on Tuesday morning, Thomas said, 314,446 people clicked to the “take action” tab, which sent them to a site listing the phone numbers where U.S. senators could be reached about the vote. While it’s unknown how many of those clicks turned into actual phone calls, Thomas said he was “100 percent sure” that the site would not have gotten nearly that many visits without Gaga’s efforts. The total number of visitors was nearly four times the amount of supporters SLDN had gathered pre-Gaga, but Thomas pointed out an even more impressive number. During that same two-week period, the pages on the SLDN website with background information on DADT got 520,298 page views. In contrast, during the first two weeks of the month, the site had 13,000 visitors and 30,000 page views. “There are many people who are high-profile who speak out in a positive manner on LGBT issues,” Thomas said. “But the difference here is she asked, ‘What can I do?’ at a time when it was critically important for the passage of our bill. Not only did she say that, but she asked how and when to do it. When you look at the past couple of weeks, you see not just strategic tweets but the video address that hit days before the critical vote and which was driving many calls to the Senate switchboard. I don’t know of many entertainers who at the critical moment for a bill would stop their website and direct it to a ‘take action’ page for a relatively small group trying to push an issue crucially important to servicemembers and those who support them.” Before Tuesday’s vote, Jim Manley, a spokesman for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid — the Nevada senator exchanged DADT-related tweets last week with Gaga — said the Democratic boss welcomed Mother Monster’s advocacy. “We appreciate the support of Lady Gaga and her supporters,” Manley said. “Sometimes that can have an impact, especially when you are as apparently committed as she is to the cause.” Even with all of Gaga’s work, CNN reported that both Collins and Snowe said Gaga’s appearance at Monday’s rally in Maine had no effect on their crucial votes; the final 56-43 tally helped ensure that the Senate would not open a DADT repeal discussion during its current session. Collins, in fact, supported the repeal, but told the network she felt she had to stay in line with her colleagues and vote against debate for procedural reasons. What do you think about Gaga’s efforts in the fight to repeal “don’t ask, don’t tell”? Share your thoughts in the comments! Related Videos Lady Gaga Rallies Against ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ Related Artists Lady Gaga

Read more from the original source:
Did Lady Gaga Have Any Impact On ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ Vote?

TV We Like: What I Learned From a Show About Nothing

I was flipping through the tube last night, and found myself in an all-too familiar situation: watching reruns of  Seinfeld .  Sure, you could chalk it up to my lack of a basic cable package, or it could be due to the fact that I’m no longer able to stomach Letterman’s increasingly senile, liberal spewage (and Leno is sort of hit-or-miss these days).  I would argue, however, that one reason stands above the rest: Seinfeld  is honest. The truth is that  Seinfeld  reflects the worst among us. It is made up of a memorable cast, all of whom play the most self-serving people you could ever meet. Self-absorbed, vain and often underhanded, the show is a perfect embodiment of many involved with the entertainment industry.  You’ve got to love its transparency. Unlike James Cameron (who is just as materialistic and self-serving as a George Costanza), you never have to worry about the show sermonizing the politically correct cause du jour. Funnily enough, it is  Seinfeld’s  lack of a soapbox that spurs me to take a good hard look at myself more than any other show on television. How often do you find yourself disgusted at the selfishness of George or Jerry, only to realize that you’ve most likely acted similarly (if not identically) at one point or another? Whether it’s as mundane as bragging about a prime parking space or as shameful as breaking up with a dame due to hygienic differences, we’ve all found ourselves in ” Seinfeld  moments” more often than we care to admit.  How often have you watched the show with your friends only to hear echoes of, “Oh, that’s so something  you would do.” Miraculously enough, I’ve probably made more self-corrections from watching  Seinfeld  than I ever would from listening to today’s self-righteous celebrities. Isn’t that the way life goes?  Whether it’s your parents putting a limit on your candy intake as a child or a pompous celebrity demanding that you adopt his opinion as your own, when someone else tries to force you, your natural instinct is to rebel. Action meets reaction. But when someone lays everything out on the table and allows you to make your own decisions, more often than not, you’ll opt for the right one. You find yourself thinking things like, “Hrm, Mom was right.  Eight pounds of Pixie Stix probably isn’t such a great idea.” Or, “I now see why fires should only be lit in a contained area.” In the same way, when watching  Seinfeld,  one often finds themselves with a well-deserved feeling of guilt in their gut, muttering, “Well, I’ll never do that again.”  A mirror’s reflection is the greatest tool one can use toward self improvement, and  Seinfeld  is one hell of a mirror. That’s why I love this show. Plus, Letterman just sucks these days. Crossposted at Big Hollywood  

Here is the original post:
TV We Like: What I Learned From a Show About Nothing

Lindsay Lohan And E-Trade Settle ‘Milkaholic’ Lawsuit

‘The family is pleased that the case has been settled,’ Dina Lohan tells TMZ. By James Dinh Lindsay Lohan Photo: Mark Ralston/ Getty Images Lindsay Lohan seems to be having her share of trouble with the law lately, but there’s one battle she has won. According to TMZ , the actress settled a $100 million lawsuit against E-Trade , which ran a Super Bowl TV spot that Lohan felt mocked her tabloid reputation. Lohan’s attorney Stephanie Ovadia revealed that the lawsuit had come to a close in a statement to TMZ: “The case between Lindsay and E-Trade has been settled … there is no further comment.” While no other details regarding the settlement have been revealed, Team Lohan is reportedly pleased with the suit’s outcome, even suggesting that the actress received an undisclosed amount of money from the suit. Dina Lohan shared her two cents on the lawsuit, telling TMZ, “The family is pleased that the case has been settled.” Representatives for E-Trade admitted to TMZ that they were interested in putting the case behind them, saying, “E*TRADE has always maintained that the claims were without merit, which is why we moved to dismiss the case. With the case now withdrawn, we are pleased to have the matter behind us.” Earlier this year, Lohan’s lawyer filed the $100 million suit in New York claiming that the actress’ name was used without her permission in an advertisement. In the spot, a female baby character named Lindsay is deemed a “milkaholic” while in the midst of a baby love triangle. “That milkaholic Lindsay wasn’t over?” the baby girl says, questioning why the baby boy didn’t call her. “Many celebrities are known by one name only, and E-Trade is using that knowledge to profit,” Ovadia told the New York Post back in March. “They used the name Lindsay. … They’re using her name as a parody of her life. Why didn’t they use the name Susan? This is a subliminal message. Everybody’s talking about it and saying it’s Lindsay Lohan.” Related Videos Lindsay Lohan: Crime And Punishment Related Photos The Highs And Lows Of Lindsay Lohan Lindsay Lohan Goes To Court Related Artists Lindsay Lohan

More here:
Lindsay Lohan And E-Trade Settle ‘Milkaholic’ Lawsuit

CNN: Vatican Conducting ‘Inquisition’ Against Dissenting Nuns

On Friday’s American Morning, CNN’s Carol Costello followed up on her biased report from the previous day , which promoted Catholic women posing as priests, with a second report on dissenting Catholics, focusing on heterodox nuns inside the U.S. Costello promoted the claim of the nuns, who accuse the Vatican of conducting an ” inquisition ,” or wanting to ” silence nuns when they disagree with the Pope .” Substitute anchor Drew Griffin gave a brief on Pope Benedict XVI’s second day in the U.K. 25 minutes into the 6 am Eastern hour, just before his colleague Kiran Chetry introduced the correspondent’s report. Chetry proclaimed how the Vatican is apparently ” squarely at odds with American nuns ,” and that many of these nuns ” feel they’re under siege from the Church, which is questioning the quality of their religious life .” Costello picked up where the anchor left off: “[T]he Vatican is now conducting two sweeping investigations of American nuns…the Vatican hopes to have a better understanding of how nuns live their lives in the United States. Nuns don’t see it that way, though. Many think these investigations are nothing short of interrogations, designed to take away all they’ve gained .” Costello led her report by featuring Sister Maureen Fiedler, a liberal public radio host who attended the “ordination” of seven women on the Danube River in 2002. Fiedler stated during her first sound bite, “Some of my friends asked me why the Vatican officials suffer from a deep seed hatred of women .” The correspondent continued by describing how “the Vatican ordered two sweeping investigations into the religious views and lifestyles of American nuns- investigations that have alarmed many sisters like Marlene Weisenbeck, whose organization represents thousands of American nuns across the country.” Sister Weisenbeck was president of the Leadership Council of Women Religious until August 2010. She led the organization when it endorsed ObamaCare , contrary to the stance of the U.S. bishops’ conference. Costello played two sound bites from the nun during her report. After reading some of the questions from a questionnaire which was sent as part of the investigations, and playing a second clip from Sister Fiedler, the CNN correspondent described how at “this year’s Leadership Conference of Women Religious (LCWR), some nuns say these investigations feel like an inquisition, and are fighting back by boycotting all or part of the questionnaire.” She continued by reading Fiedler’s “fears” over the investigations: “Fiedler says many nuns, who haven’t lived in convents or worn habits since the 1950s, fear the Vatican wants to force them back into both . She also fears Rome wants to silence nuns when they disagree with the Pope on issues like gays in the Church or women’s rights , something the Church now allows them to do.” Later in her report, Costello played two clips from Father Joseph Tobin of the Vatican’s Congregation for Religious, who was also featured in her Thursday report on women “priests.” He again gave mild responses to the correspondent. Near the end of the segment, the CNN correspondent noted how “CNN analyst John Allen tells us he expects the Vatican investigations will wrap up by December, and adds if the Vatican wants nuns to return to more conservative lives, they should just be patient, because young women, who are considering sisterhood, are more conservative than their elders .” But Costello featured none of these more orthodox nuns during her report, such as those represented by another umbrella group of nuns, the Council of Major Superiors of Women Religious. The president of the Council, Mother Mary Quentin Sheridan, expressed her support of the American bishops’ opposition to ObamaCare , contrary to the stance of the LCWR. Griffin asked Costello a bizarre final question: “You know, Carol, what’s interesting about this is- these women, who are in the Catholic Church, have been fighting with the Church forever for a greater role, in taking part of this. But are there any financial ties between these nuns and the Vatican? I thought that nuns in this country pretty much were financially independent and had to raise money on their own. So, I’m wondering just why they even care what the Vatican says? ” Well, if these nuns want to consider themselves Catholic and appear to be Catholic, they should care what the hierarchy of their own Church says and support its teachings, something that many of the nuns who are part of the LCWR refuse to do. The full transcript of Carol Costello’s report from Friday’s American Morning: GRIFFIN: Welcome back. This is the ‘Most News in the Morning,’ and it is day two of Pope Benedict’s historic trip to Britain. There he is meeting with students at a Catholic school today, and then religious leaders in London. Yesterday, for the first time, the Pope admitted the Church failed in handling priest sex abuse cases. He’s expected to meet with victims tomorrow. CHETRY: Well, in this country, the Vatican is squarely at odds with American nuns. Many of them feel they’re under siege from the Church, which is questioning the quality of their religious life, and the sisters are having their say. Carol Costello is live in Washington with an “A.M. Original” for us this morning. Hey, Carol. CAROL COSTELLO: Good morning- CHETRY: So what’s going on with the Vatican and the nuns? COSTELLO: Well, Kiran, the Vatican is now conducting two sweeping investigations of American nuns. The latest round of ‘visitations’ are now underway, and the Vatican hopes to have a better understanding of how nuns live their lives in the United States. Nuns don’t see it that way, though. Many think these investigations are nothing short of interrogations, designed to take away all they’ve gained. SISTER MAUREEN FIEDLER: Some of my friends asked me why the Vatican officials suffer from a deep seed hatred of women. COSTELLO (voice-over): On Sister Maureen Fielder’s Washington radio show- FIEDLER: Could they be serious? COSTELLO: The role of women in the Catholic Church is a popular one. The talk has been heated ever since the Vatican ordered two sweeping investigations into the religious views and lifestyles of American nuns- investigations that have alarmed many sisters like Marlene Weisenbeck, whose organization represents thousands of American nuns across the country. SISTER MARLENE WEISENBECK, LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE OF WOMEN RELIGIOUS: We weren’t quite expecting to walk into this kind of a process that would test our authenticity and our integrity. COSTELLO: One of the investigations involved a two-part questionnaire consisting of 120 detailed questions like, ‘What is the process for responding to sisters who dissent publicly from Church teaching and discipline?’ ‘How does the matter of the dress of your sisters lend to the dignity and simplicity of your vocation?’ And this, ‘What are the procedures for dealing with matters such as civil disobedience, criminal activity, sexual improprieties, et cetera?’ FIEDLER: I think they want to be able to control what nuns do. They- you know, in every aspect of their lives. COSTELLO: (women singing) At this year’s Leadership Conference of Women Religious, some nuns say these investigations feel like an inquisition, and are fighting back by boycotting all or part of the questionnaire. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Okay. Are we ready for prayer? COSTELLO: Fiedler says many nuns, who haven’t lived in convents or worn habits since the 1950s, fear the Vatican wants to force them back into both. She also fears Rome wants to silence nuns when they disagree with the Pope on issues like gays in the Church or women’s rights, something the Church now allows them to do. FATHER JOSEPH TOBIN, CONGREGATION FOR RELIGIOUS: Some of it might be a very deep seeded misunderstanding. COSTELLO: The Vatican is hoping that Father Tobin, who was just appointed the number two official for religious life, can help calm the fear surrounding these investigations. TOBIN: There is a need for a dialogue, and I think dialogue means that the two parties are honestly conversing in search of the truth. COSTELLO: Sister Marlene hopes that’s true, but- WEISENBECK: There is no turning back. I don’t think that that happens in any kind of living organism. God doesn’t turn the Church- doesn’t turn creation in opposite directions. COSTELLO (live): In other words, there is no turning back the clock for American nuns. Our CNN analyst, John Allen, tells us he expects the Vatican investigations will wrap up by December, and adds if the Vatican wants nuns to return to more conservative lives, they should just be patient, because young women, who are considering sisterhood, are more conservative than their elders. And many, Kiran, are even willing to return to wearing habits, although, convents- maybe not so much. CHETRY: That’s interesting. And what is the fallout, if anything, about boycotting all or part of that questionnaire you were referring to? COSTELLO: You know, we don’t know. Everything surrounding these investigations is quite mysterious. The Vatican isn’t talking much about it. But they’re hoping that Father Tobin can calm fears and get more nuns to answer the questionnaires and also to answer- you know, there are going to be people from the Vatican coming in and having one-on-one conversations with nuns, and they’re hoping that the nuns will feel comfortable doing that if their fears are- you know, calmed down somewhat. We’ll just have to see. We don’t know. GRIFFIN: You know, Carol, what’s interesting about this is- these women, who are in the Catholic Church, have been fighting with the Church forever for a greater role, in taking part of this. But are there any financial ties between these nuns and the Vatican? I thought that nuns in this country pretty much were financially independent and had to raise money on their own. So, I’m wondering just why they even care what the Vatican says? COSTELLO: Well, I think you’ve hit the nail on the head, and the Vatican is certainly aware of that because nuns own universities. They own their own property. They very much- you know, work for charity and social justice issues. They’re very much on their own and independent, yet they’re very important to the Church, because they do a lot of work inside the Church and for Catholicism worldwide. So, the Vatican wants to keep them. The nuns know that they have a certain amount of financial power, and they don’t really need the Vatican. But- you know, they’re loyal Catholics, and it’s not like they want to split from the Church or anything. They love Catholicism. So, hopefully, all will be mended soon. But these investigations- nobody knows exactly why they’re being conducted, and that’s just creating all of this turmoil that doesn’t necessarily have to be there. GRIFFIN: Yeah. Well, thanks, Carol. I mean, there is the faith and then there is the Catholic organization, and I guess that’s where the two are disjointed from each other at the moment. But it’s been an interesting couple of days- couple of [unintelligible]. Thanks so much for that. COSTELLO: Thank you.

The rest is here:
CNN: Vatican Conducting ‘Inquisition’ Against Dissenting Nuns