Tag Archives: college

Watch Hellcats Season 1 Episode 2 – I Say a Little Prayer

Watch Hellcats S1E2: I Say a Little Prayer The new installment of Hellcats which is entitled “I Say a Little Prayer” is the new teen comedy-drama TV show’s 2nd episode of the 1st season that aired last 09/15/2010 Wednesday at 9:00 PM on CW.

George Stephanopoulos Touts Attacks By O’Donnell Opponents: She’s a ‘Nutty,’ ‘Mentally Unhinged’ ‘Liar’

Liberal journalists don’t usually highlight Karl Rove as an authoritative voice, but that’s what George Stephanopoulos did on Wednesday’s Good Morning America. Interviewing senatorial nominee Christine O’Donnell, the ABC host touted the conservative strategist’s dismissal of the Delaware Republican for saying “some nutty things.” Stephanopoulos also played up charges by Delaware’s Republican Party Chairman Tom Ross that O’Donnell is a “liar” and “mentally unhinged.” The ABC host wondered if her primary victory could “help the Democrats.” Stephanopoulos noted only negative news for the surprise winner of the Delaware senatorial primary, asserting that “…The national Republican Party is not going to give you any funds.” (This later turned out not to be true .) Later in the show, news anchor Juju Chang would label the liberal Mike Castle, O’Donnell’s defeated primary opponent, ” a mainstream Republican .” During Wednesday’s interview, Stephanopoulos never mentioned Castle. Instead, he parroted, “We saw that the Republican Party chairman in Jon Karl’s piece there, he went on to say, that you’re ‘not a viable candidate.'” Piling on, the host continued, “…You ‘cannot be elected dog catcher in Delaware.’ [Ross] went on to say that you’re either a liar or mentally unhinged.” Stephanopoulos then played a clip of Rove, on Fox News, slamming O’Donnell. When candidate Ned Lamont beat Joe Lieberman for Connecticut’s Democratic primary in 2006, journalists gushed over the insurgent “anti-war” politician. The Washington Post deemed him a “fiscal conservative.” A transcript of the September 15 segment, which aired at 7:04am EDT, follows: 7am tease GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: And this morning, Tea Party shocker. CHRISTINE O’DONNELL: No more politics as usual. STEPHANOPOULOS: Another Sarah Palin mamma grizzly wins, this time in Delaware. But, could this victory help the Democrats? 7:04 STEPHANOPOULOS: And the big winner joins us now. Christine O’Donnell from Delaware. Good morning. Thank you for getting up so early. And congratulations. Did Sarah Palin make the difference here? CHRISTINE O’DONNELL: Thank you, George. Yes, she did. All summer we’ve been working very hard to get out there. Give the voters an opportunity to meet me, to know me. So that I’ve been asking them that when you vote for me, I want you- I want the vote to mean something. I want it to be a vote of confidence. So, when the mud-slinging started, I was very encouraged that what a lot of people said was, “We knew what your opponent was putting out wasn’t reflective of who we know you to be.” And when Governor Palin stood up and so boldly made a statement that she supported me, it allowed them to get past the politics of personal destruction, to look at the message and look at the fact that I wanted to make this race about the issue. How we’re going to get jobs back in Delaware. How we’re going to defend the homeland of our security. And she helped to get it back on track. STEPHANOPOULOS: You’re going to need all the help she can give right now. She’s going to need to raise some money for you. ‘Cause we just heard Jon. Karl say the national Republican Party is not going to give you any funds. O’DONNELL: Well, that’s a shame. But they never thought I could win this race. And I believe that we can win without them. This is about giving the political power back to we, the people. And we proved the so-called experts wrong. So, I think a few of them, perhaps, may have their pride hurt this morning. But, you know, I didn’t count on the establishment to win the primary. I’m not counting of them to win the general. I’m counting on the voters of Delaware. And we’re going to work hard to make sure that we take our message to them. STEPHANOPOULOS: But- But you are going to have to answer some questions. We saw that the Republican Party chairman in Jon Karl’s piece there, he went on to say, that you’re “not a viable candidate.” That you “cannot be elected dog catcher in Delaware.” He went on to say that you’re either a liar or mentally unhinged. And Karl Rove, President Bush’s former political adviser, was on Fox News, very tough, talking about your checkered background. O’DONNELL: Right. STEPHANOPOULOS: Saying you say some nutty things. And, listen, he went on to say, you have to answer these questions. KARL ROVE: Why did she mislead voters about her college education? How come it took her nearly two decades to pay her college bills so she could get college degree? How did she make a living? Why did she sue a well-known and well-thought-of conservative think tank? STEPHANOPOULOS: Can you answer those questions? O’DONNELL: Yeah. Everything he’s saying is unfactual [sic]. And it’s a shame. Because he’s the same, so called political guru that predicted that I wasn’t going to win. And we won. And we won big. So, I think, again, he’s eating some humble pie and he’s just trying to restore his reputation. But, again, I’m counting on the voters in Delaware. Like I said this, is about giving the political process back to the people. People are tired of what’s going on in Washington. These failed policies that don’t represent them. My Republican opponent did not have a record to stand on. He supported the Democrats more than he supported the Republicans. And when we started gaining momentum and we started gaining credibility in this race, it made the Republican establishment look like lazy people who did not care about their principles. But I hope that we can put that behind us because if they’re really serious about winning, I was ahead in the general election, according to Rasmussen, before this Republican cannibalism started. So, if they were serious about winning, we could repair the damage done and move forward. And that’s the challenge I put out to them. But, if not, I truly believe we can win. STEPHANOPOULOS: You call it Republican- You call it Republican cannibalism, saying that what Karl Rove is unfactual. But it is true that you had conflicting statements about your college record. That you had- That the big issue in the campaign was failure to pay back taxes. O’DONNELL: That is not true. STEPHANOPOULOS: Failure to pay campaign debts. Failure to pay your mortgage. So, can you clear that up? O’DONNELL: That’s simply not true. We addressed all this stuff. Absolutely. Absolutely. And first of all, they also said that Ronald Reagan wasn’t electable. We’ve addressed all of this stuff on our website. It took me 12 years to pay off my college loans. I’m not a trust fund baby. Most Delawareans can relate to having to work hard to pay for their own college education. I was never dishonest about that. They made up an accusation about an IRS tax lien. The IRS said, “Oops, it was a mistake.” They cleared it up right away. We presented my opponent and the republican administration, showing them that the IRS had admitted to a computer error. They chose to ignore the truth because they don’t have a record to stand on. And it’s humiliating when the party gets behind this guy who they say is the only one who can win. But doesn’t stand for anything that the Republican Party stands for. So, they have to cling to these baseless accusations. And it’s a shame because I want to go into this general election telling the Delaware voters the proposals that I want to introduce in Washington to get jobs back into Delaware, to get our economy back on track. To take care of our veterans. And as we move forward, I hope that my Democratic opponent learns the same lesson that my Republican opponent learned. That dirty politics will backfire. In a state like Delaware, where it’s small enough to get to know all of the voters, that’s exactly what we intend to do this next month and a half. It didn’t work for Castle. It won’t work for the Democrats. STEPHANOPOULOS: And we will be watching. Congratulations again. Thanks for your time this morning.

Read more:
George Stephanopoulos Touts Attacks By O’Donnell Opponents: She’s a ‘Nutty,’ ‘Mentally Unhinged’ ‘Liar’

College Student Cuts Dean’s Throat Before Governor’s Appearance [Crime]

A student wearing a bullet-proof vest cut the throat of a dean at Kansas City ‘s Metropolitan Community College-Penn Valley today, before a press conference where Missouri’s governor was expected to speak only minutes later. The dean is still alive. More

CBS: ‘Controversial Tea Party Candidate’ In Favor of Abstinence, Against Porn

In a report on the Republican senate primary in Delaware on Tuesday’s CBS Early Show, correspondent Nancy Cordes portrayed tea party favorite Christine O’Donnell’s conservative social views as being on the fringe: “[She] has crusaded for abstinence and against porn. Writing once that ‘when a married person uses pornography, it compromises the spouse’s purity.'” Cordes noted O’Donnell’s position on those issues following a sound bite of primary opponent Mike Castle declaring: “I think she’s too extreme for Delaware.” In another sound bite after Cordes’s comment, editor-in-chief of The Hotline, Reid Wilson, explained: “If Christine O’Donnell wins the primary election she’s going to have a very difficult time winning in what is still a very blue, very Democratic state.” In concluding the report, Cordes observed: “…until recently this seat in Delaware seemed like it was in the bag.” Fill-in co-host Erica Hill replied: “Ah, but no longer.” Following the report, Hill interviewed O’Donnell, focusing on the candidate’s position in the polls and financial issues being raised in the campaign. Throughout the interview, the headline on screen read: “Primary Day; Controversial Tea Party Candidate Takes On Establishment.” Here is a full transcript of Cordes’s September 14 report and Hill’s interview with O’Donnell: 7:00AM TEASE: ERICA HILL: Primary day. Voters in more than half a dozen states head to the polls today and all eyes are on tea party candidates looking for big upsets, including a key Senate race in Delaware. We’ll speak with the woman at the center of the contest. 7:01AM SEGMENT: HILL: First, though, we turn to politics this morning. The tea party and voter anger. There are more primary elections today around the country and tea party candidates are hoping to upset some more established Republicans. CBS News congressional correspondent Nancy Cordes is in Washington this morning with the latest. Nancy, good morning. CORDES: Good morning, Erica. There are primaries in seven states and D.C. today. But the one that everyone is watching is in Delaware, because who wins there could very well determine whether Republicans have a shot at taking control of the Senate. It was a $250,000 pledge from the Tea Party Express that vaulted Republican Christine O’Donnell from dark horse to contender in the Delaware Senate primary. CHRISTINE O’DONNELL: There’s a tidal wave coming in Delaware and we’re riding it and my opponent is drowning in it. CORDES: Everyone thought her opponent would be a shoo-in. Mike Castle is a popular nine-term Congressman and former Delaware governor. But the newest polls show them neck and neck. MIKE CASTLE: So I think she’s too extreme for Delaware. CORDES: O’Donnell, a former marketing consultant, has crusaded for abstinence and against porn. Writing once that ‘when a married person uses pornography, it compromises the spouse’s purity.’ REID WILSON [EDITOR-IN-CHIEF, THE HOTLINE]: If Christine O’Donnell wins the primary election she’s going to have a very difficult time winning in what is still a very blue, very Democratic state. CORDES: And that is why Republican leaders are putting all their muscle behind Castle. CAMPAIGN AD: She didn’t pay thousands in income taxes, had to be sued by a university for thousands in unpaid bills. CORDES: O’Donnell is hoping to even the score with a late endorsement from Sarah Palin. Who’s also recording robo-calls for her. SARAH PALIN: Christine will help usher in the real change that we need to get America on the right track. CORDES: The stakes are so high in Delaware because Republicans must win this special election for Vice President Biden’s former seat if they want a real chance to reclaim the Senate. They need to win ten Senate seats to do that, and until recently this seat in Delaware seemed like it was in the bag, Erica. HILL: Ah, but no longer. CBS’s Nancy Cordes joining us from Washington this morning. Nancy, thanks. And Republican U.S. Senate candidate Christine O’Donnell joins us this morning from outside a polling station in Wilmington, Delaware. Good to have you with us this morning. O’DONNELL: Good morning, Erica. Thank you for having me. [ON-SCREEN HEADLINE: Primary Day; Controversial Tea Party Candidate Takes On Establishment] HILL: As we just heard from Nancy, you have the support of Sarah Palin at this point, you have the support of the Tea Party express. But Freedom Works, which is the group backed by Dick Armey which has backed a number of tea party candidates, has not given you its support, saying that they see you as a weak candidate, they don’t believe you can win in a general election. But as Nancy noted, some of those polls showing you creeping up. Why do you feel that you can not only win here but also convince moderates and even some Democrats to vote for you come November? O’DONNELL: You know, people didn’t think that we would get this far in the primary, either. And I think that that’s a lazy way out to say that we can’t win. We have a winning message that after the primary we’re going to take into the general election. A message that resonates with independents and Democrats. Because the people who are struggling economically, it doesn’t go by party lines. Our message is that we need real economic growth, based on the private sector. We need to create jobs by getting the government out of the way of the small business owner and the entrepreneur. We can’t afford more of these big spending bills that my Republican and Democrat opponents support. Commonsense men and women here in Delaware know that that’s not sustainable. And I’m fortunate, because my opponent has – he can’t stand on his record, so he’s resorted to character assassination. And it’s backfired. It’s really exciting that the voters are seeing right through that. They’re tired of politics as usual, and they’re rallying behind me, because they trust me to represent them in Washington, a much-needed real change in Washington. HILL: There’s been some focus on both your experience, you’ve never held an elected office, and also some questions raised about your own financial history. It took 12 years for you to get your college degree because you hadn’t paid off some loans. There were some leftover campaign debt. You mentioned the importance of finances, and of the economy, and of jobs. Can voters trust you, then, someone who has had financial trouble? O’DONNELL: Absolutely. Erica, thank you for this opportunity to clear the record. All of those accusations are addressed on my website, Christine2010.com. And when the question of financial responsibility comes into question, you have to look at how I handled those financial difficulties. I’m an average hard-working American. I’m not a multimillionaire like my opponent. Of course in this economy I’m fallen on hard times. But I worked hard, I sacrificed, I made the decision that I needed to make things right. I came through to the other side in a very strong position. I made it through the difficult times. That’s what the voters are seeing. Financial responsibility is making your obligations right. My opponent has cashed a government paycheck, a taxpayer-funded government paycheck, for over four decades. So when he makes those accusations that that’s irresponsible because someone has struggled, he’s insulting the voters. And I think that’s where the backlash has come from. And that’s why so many former people who once supported my opponent are now on my side. Because it’s this obnoxious sense of entitlement that this position should be handed to the next anointed king. It’s sad. HILL: I want to take a look – I want to take a look at your support before we let you go. You’ve had some endorsements from outside the state of Delaware. Senator Jim DeMint of South Carolina has endorsed you and we mentioned Sarah Palin. How much of your funding, though, how much of your volunteer staff, is actually coming from within the state of Delaware? There’s been some criticism that too much of it is a national, not a local level. O’DONNELL: Well, we have an army of volunteers that have given us the strength we need to get the national attention. And my opponent, over – about 70% of his donations come from out-of-state corporate special interest PACs. So we’ve got a lot- HILL: Why do you feel that national attention is so important to this race for the state of Delaware. Why do you need it? O’DONNELL: Well for us, we’re relying on the grassroots support. We are not a party apparatus. So when the – when Palin and DeMint and Sean Hannity and others have come in and gotten behind our grassroots effort, it was a vote of confidence for we, the people, and a vote against the politics of personal destruction. So what they were saying was, enough is enough. This election, the focus of this election, should be how we’re going to get private sector jobs back in Delaware. How we’re going to defend the security of our homeland. How we’re going to take care of our veterans. When the national support came in, it was saying enough is enough. Let’s talk about the real issues- HILL: Okay, we’re going to have to leave it there O’DONNELL: And that excited our war-weary troops who have gotten us this far.                      HILL: We’ll have to leave it there. O’DONNELL: Thank you very much, Erica. HILL: But we’ll be watching the results. Christine O’Donnell, thanks.

See the article here:
CBS: ‘Controversial Tea Party Candidate’ In Favor of Abstinence, Against Porn

Cami Secret Parody (Boob Apron)

OK I am 0 for 3 in this group. 1 was pulled because i did not realize the girl went completely naked at the end. The other 2 did not even show a hint of nip. Yeah I still have not got over it. Plus certain leaders of the group ignored my queries… (i am looking at you Delia) Lets see if this one stays up or Admin pulls it without notifying me. added by: onemalefla

Wilkerson on 9/11

Lawrence Wilkerson is a retired United States Army soldier and former chief of staff to United States Secretary of State Colin Powell. Wilkerson is an adjunct professor at the College of William & Mary where he teaches courses on US national security. He also instructs a senior seminar in the Honors Department at the George Washington University entitled “National Security Decision Making.” added by: treewolf39

The Brain Speaks: Scientists Decode Words from Brain Signals

Sept. 7, 2010 — In an early step toward letting severely paralyzed people speak with their thoughts, University of Utah researchers translated brain signals into words using two grids of 16 microelectrodes implanted beneath the skull but atop the brain. “We have been able to decode spoken words using only signals from the brain with a device that has promise for long-term use in paralyzed patients who cannot now speak,” says Bradley Greger, an assistant professor of bioengineering. Because the method needs much more improvement and involves placing electrodes on the brain, he expects it will be a few years before clinical trials on paralyzed people who cannot speak due to so-called “locked-in syndrome.” The Journal of Neural Engineering's September issue is publishing Greger's study showing the feasibility of translating brain signals into computer-spoken words. The University of Utah research team placed grids of tiny microelectrodes over speech centers in the brain of a volunteer with severe epileptic seizures. The man already had a craniotomy – temporary partial skull removal – so doctors could place larger, conventional electrodes to locate the source of his seizures and surgically stop them. Using the experimental microelectrodes, the scientists recorded brain signals as the patient repeatedly read each of 10 words that might be useful to a paralyzed person: yes, no, hot, cold, hungry, thirsty, hello, goodbye, more and less. Later, they tried figuring out which brain signals represented each of the 10 words. When they compared any two brain signals – such as those generated when the man said the words “yes” and “no” – they were able to distinguish brain signals for each word 76 percent to 90 percent of the time. When they examined all 10 brain signal patterns at once, they were able to pick out the correct word any one signal represented only 28 percent to 48 percent of the time – better than chance (which would have been 10 percent) but not good enough for a device to translate a paralyzed person's thoughts into words spoken by a computer. “This is proof of concept,” Greger says, “We've proven these signals can tell you what the person is saying well above chance. But we need to be able to do more words with more accuracy before it is something a patient really might find useful.” People who eventually could benefit from a wireless device that converts thoughts into computer-spoken spoken words include those paralyzed by stroke, Lou Gehrig's disease and trauma, Greger says. People who are now “locked in” often communicate with any movement they can make – blinking an eye or moving a hand slightly – to arduously pick letters or words from a list. University of Utah colleagues who conducted the study with Greger included electrical engineers Spencer Kellis, a doctoral student, and Richard Brown, dean of the College of Engineering; and Paul House, an assistant professor of neurosurgery. Another coauthor was Kai Miller, a neuroscientist at the University of Washington in Seattle. The research was funded by the National Institutes of Health, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, the University of Utah Research Foundation and the National Science Foundation. Nonpenetrating Microelectrodes Read Brain's Speech Signals The study used a new kind of nonpenetrating microelectrode that sits on the brain without poking into it. These electrodes are known as microECoGs because they are a small version of the much larger electrodes used for electrocorticography, or ECoG, developed a half century ago. For patients with severe epileptic seizures uncontrolled by medication, surgeons remove part of the skull and place a silicone mat containing ECoG electrodes over the brain for days to weeks while the cranium is held in place but not reattached. The button-sized ECoG electrodes don't penetrate the brain but detect abnormal electrical activity and allow surgeons to locate and remove a small portion of the brain causing the seizures. Last year, Greger and colleagues published a study showing the much smaller microECoG electrodes could “read” brain signals controlling arm movements. One of the epileptic patients involved in that study also volunteered for the new study. Because the microelectrodes do not penetrate brain matter, they are considered safe to place on speech areas of the brain – something that cannot be done with penetrating electrodes that have been used in experimental devices to help paralyzed people control a computer cursor or an artificial arm. EEG electrodes used on the skull to record brain waves are too big and record too many brain signals to be used easily for decoding speech signals from paralyzed people. Translating Nerve Signals into Words In the new study, the microelectrodes were used to detect weak electrical signals from the brain generated by a few thousand neurons or nerve cells. Each of two grids with 16 microECoGs spaced 1 millimeter (about one-25th of an inch) apart, was placed over one of two speech areas of the brain: First, the facial motor cortex, which controls movements of the mouth, lips, tongue and face – basically the muscles involved in speaking. Second, Wernicke's area, a little understood part of the human brain tied to language comprehension and understanding. The study was conducted during one-hour sessions on four consecutive days. Researchers told the epilepsy patient to repeat one of the 10 words each time they pointed at the patient. Brain signals were recorded via the two grids of microelectrodes. Each of the 10 words was repeated from 31 to 96 times, depending on how tired the patient was. Then the researchers “looked for patterns in the brain signals that correspond to the different words” by analyzing changes in strength of different frequencies within each nerve signal, says Greger. The researchers found that each spoken word produced varying brain signals, and thus the pattern of electrodes that most accurately identified each word varied from word to word. They say that supports the theory that closely spaced microelectrodes can capture signals from single, column-shaped processing units of neurons in the brain. One unexpected finding: When the patient repeated words, the facial motor cortex was most active and Wernicke's area was less active. Yet Wernicke's area “lit up” when the patient was thanked by researchers after repeating words. It shows Wernicke's area is more involved in high-level understanding of language, while the facial motor cortex controls facial muscles that help produce sounds, Greger says. More at link… added by: Almibry

AP Howler of the Day: Kasich ‘Keeping Pace’ With Strickland in OH Guv Race

Talk about an in-kind contribution. In a short item about a Democratic Governors Association election complaint about Ohio GOP gubernatorial candidate John Kasich, the Associated Press’s Julie Carr Smyth showed that she is willfully ignoring Buckeye State reality, or has been living a hermit’s existence for the past few months. In describing Kasich’s standing against Democratic incumbent governor Ted Strickland, Smyth claimed that Kasich “is keeping pace with Strickland in polls and fundraising” (a picture of the relevant paragraph is here ). As you can see , that’s sort of like a baseball writer claiming that “The Cincinnati Reds are keeping pace with the Chicago Cubs this year”: For those who aren’t following baseball closely, the Reds have a 21-1/2 game lead on the Cubs with less than 30 games remaining. Who do you think you’re foolin’, babe? (Answer: Relatively disengaged voters who need to given the impression that the sinking Strickland campaign is really on track to victory, instead of heading towards the first defeat of an incumbent governor in the Buckeye State in 36 years.) Democrats are upset that Kasich appeared on Fox News and was able to give out the name of his web site and encourage viewers to donate to his campaign during Bill O’Reilly’s show on August 18. Awwww. The election complaint is carried at a Huffington Post item courtesy of Sam Stein , a former NewsWeak (spelled that way on purpose) reporter . Two years ago, Stein claimed that Republican presidential nominee John McCain couldn’t possibly have vetted VP pick Sarah Palin because no one had visited her town’s local newspaper and looked through its archives. Well Sam, that just might be because the paper’s archives going back a decade were available online , and contained hundreds of entries. This Internet thing is pretty cool when you have a clue about how to use it. Ben Smith at Politico, who is not being linked because of his outfit’s outrageous attempt to shut down the College Politico, seems to think that this complaint has as much validity as Stein’s unproven claim against Team McCain two years ago: It seems to hinge on a chyron and, to my eye, is more in the great tradition of thin, high-profile election-year litigation than about winning in court. Speaking of “in-kind contributions,” maybe Julie Carr Smyth can estimate how much value favoring Strickland we should place on her demonstrably false claim in a national news story that Kasich is only “keeping” pace with him, when the fact is that Kasich has an averaged-out double-digit lead? Cross-posted at Bizzyblog.com .

Go here to see the original:
AP Howler of the Day: Kasich ‘Keeping Pace’ With Strickland in OH Guv Race

Erica Blasberg Bio

Biography for Erica Blasberg Full name Erica Paige Blasberg Born July 14, 1984(1984-07-14) Orange, California, U.S. Died May 9, 2010 (aged 25) Henderson, Nevada, U.S. Height 5 ft 6 in (1.68 m) Nationality United States Residence Henderson, Nevada, U.S. Career College University of Arizona (two years) Turned professional 2004 Current tour(s) LPGA (joined 2005) Former tour(s) Futures Tour (joined 2004) Professional wins 1 Number of wins by tour Futures Tour 1 Best results in LPGA Majo

See the rest here:
Erica Blasberg Bio

NY Jets Star Zings Rookie — You Got Paid at USC

Filed under: TMZ Sports , TV NY Jets rookie running back Joe McKnight (#25) took a shot from veteran linebacker Bart Scott (#57) on last night’s episode of HBO’s ” Hard Knocks ” — after the Pro Bowler jokingly insinuated that McKnight was on the take during his college career at… Read more

Read the rest here:
NY Jets Star Zings Rookie — You Got Paid at USC