Tag Archives: congress

Illegal Alien Incarceration Bad for States’ Budgets

By Jim Kouri Tuesday, June 15, 2010 President Barack Obama says he wants lawmakers in both houses of Congress to make progress this year on reforming the immigration system. However, he’s not talking about how his administration is failing to protect citizens from criminal aliens. When the United States incarcerates criminal aliens — non-citizens convicted of crimes while in this country legally or illegally — in federal and state prisons and local jails, the federal government bears only a small part of the costs. While the federal government pays to incarcerate criminal aliens in federal prisons, it reimburses state and local governments such as Arizona for a mere portion of their costs of incarcerating some, but not all, criminal aliens illegally in the country through the Department of Justice’s State Criminal Alien Assistance Program managed by the Bureau of Justice Assistance. Some state and local governments have expressed concerns about the impact that criminal aliens have on already overcrowded prisons and jails and that the federal government reimburses them for only a portion of their costs of incarcerating criminal aliens. Congress requested that the General Accounting Office provide information concerning criminal aliens incarcerated at the federal, state, and local level. For the criminal aliens incarcerated, the state and local governments that received reimbursement through SCAAP, only received about 25 percent of the costs . At the federal level, the number of criminal aliens incarcerated increased from about 42,000 at the end of calendar year 2001 to about 49,000 at the end of calendar year 2004 — a 15 percent increase. The percentage of all federal prisoners who are criminal aliens has remained the same over the last 3 years — about 27 percent. The majority of criminal aliens incarcerated at the end of calendar year 2004 were identified as citizens of Mexico. It is estimated the federal cost of incarcerating criminal aliens — Bureau of Prison’s cost to incarcerate criminals and reimbursements to state and local governments under SCAAP — totaled approximately $5.8 billion for calendar years 2001 through 2004. BOP’s cost to incarcerate criminal aliens rose from about $950 million in 2001 to about $1.2 billion in 2004 — a 14 percent increase. Federal reimbursements for incarcerating criminal aliens in state prisons and local jails declined from $550 million in 2001 to $280 million in 2004, in a large part due to a reduction in congressional appropriations. At the state level, the 50 states received reimbursement for incarcerating about 77,000 criminal aliens in fiscal year 2002 and 47 states received reimbursement for incarcerating about 74,000 in fiscal year 2003. For the 5 states incarcerating about 80 percent of these criminal aliens in fiscal year 2003, about 68 percent incarcerated in mid-year 2004 reported that the country of citizenship or country of birth as Mexico, the Dominican Republic, or Cuba. Four of these 5 states spent about $1.6 billion to incarcerate criminal aliens reimbursed through SCAAP during fiscal years 2002 and 2003. Estimates are that the federal government reimbursed these four states about 25 percent or less of the estimated cost to incarcerate these criminal aliens in fiscal years 2002 and 2003. At the local level, in fiscal year 2002, SCAAP reimbursed about 750 local governments for incarcerating about 138,000 criminal aliens. In fiscal year 2003, SCAAP reimbursed about 700 local governments for about 147,000 criminal aliens, with 5 local jail systems accounting for about 30 percent of these criminal aliens. The 147,000 criminal aliens incarcerated during fiscal year 2003 spent a total of about 8.5 million days in jail. Mexico leads as the country of birth for foreign-born arrestees at these 5 local jails in fiscal year 2003. It’s estimated that 4 of these 5 local jails spent $390 million in fiscal years 2002 and 2003 to incarcerate criminal aliens and were reimbursed about $73 million through SCAAP. It’s believed that the federal government reimbursed these localities about 25 percent or less of the criminal alien incarceration cost in fiscal years 2002 and 2003. Sources: US Justice Department, US Bureau of Prisons, General Accountability Office, American Federation of Police, National Association of Chiefs of Police http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/24303 added by: Nick_Hearn

Bachmann: Obama Oil Spill Response ‘Dereliction of Leadership’; Media Lowered President’s ‘Level of Accountability’

Minnesota Republican Rep. Michele Bachmann isn’t exactly known for her reticence on the news of the day. And when it comes to the White House’s handling of the BP oil spill disaster, Bachmann had some harsh words for President Barack Obama. Speaking at the June 25 Bloggers Briefing at the Heritage Foundation , Bachmann pointed out how she thought it was peculiar that all the comments coming out of the White House were geared toward the president specifically and not to the victims of this crisis. “The thing that we’re all focusing on today will be the president’s remarks that he’ll be giving tonight and it looks like an absolute opportunism moment for the president to try and advance the next stage of his legislative agenda,” Bachmann said. “And I think the curious feature in all of this has been: this is a major disaster and yet it seems like every response that has been coming out of the White House has been about the president rather than about the disaster. That is odd to me. That seems extremely odd.” The Minnesota Republican said the hapless reaction to the oil spill event and the administration’s mishandling of the Nashville flood in April that went largely ignored by the President and the media raised questions about the administration’s leadership. “It seems like a dereliction of leadership, especially when you consider what happened in Nashville was also a disaster – an unmitigated disaster for the people down in Nashville,” she said. “Not only has the president not yet visited to highlight the devastation that has happened to businesses and people’s lives there, but he also hasn’t even mentioned Nashville as a disaster. That’s interesting to me, how the White House seems to be picking and choosing between disasters – for whatever reason and I can’t speculate what that reason may be, but for some reason Nashville didn’t make the cut for a presidential visit or a presidential mention.” When asked, Bachmann didn’t sound too hopeful that Congress would exercise its oversight role and hold hearing looking into what she suggested was the federal government’s mishandling of the oil spill response efforts. “I am sure Nancy Pelosi will get on that tomorrow morning and Harry Reid,” she said, to laughter. She characterized the ongoing Gulf disaster as a missed opportunity for the president to untie the country, something that “candidate Obama” seemingly could have done, as opposed to President Obama. “I give the President a lot of credit as candidate Obama,” she continued. “He really did have kind of a once-in-a-generation opportunity to be that transformational president, which I wish he could have been. But unfortunately the last 18 months I think we have seen the ground shake underneath our country because of a lot of policy decisions he’s made but also from a stylistic point of view – the way that he has handled various crises in his presidency – and I don’t think that has engendered confidence.” She also mentioned the White House’s handling of  last month’s flotilla disaster, and she took a shot at the media for not holding Obama as accountable as they held the Bush administration for similar responses. “Look at the blockade situation with Turkey and with Israel,” Bachmann said. “All the wrong signals were sent out of that event in my opinion. And it’s made Israel even more vulnerable than they were before. So for that and a lot of other reasons, I think we really need to give – the White House needs to be held at least to the same level of accountability the previous administration was held to. And I don’t see that media, present company excluded, has necessarily done that.”

Follow this link:
Bachmann: Obama Oil Spill Response ‘Dereliction of Leadership’; Media Lowered President’s ‘Level of Accountability’

Politico’s Roger Simon: Obama ‘Calling Out’ Bobby Jindal’s ‘Hypocrisy’

Appearing on MSNBC’s Andrea Mitchell Reports on Tuesday, Politico columnist Roger Simon described a recent interview with President Obama: “…he showed a genuine irritation….when people like Bobby Jindal, you know, standing up, screaming about more federal action…a small-government, no federal aid kind of guy. And the President is calling out those people for hypocrisy.” Simon was discussing a quote from Obama in that interview , in which the President whined: “Some of the same folks who have been hollering and saying do something are the same folks who, just two or three months ago, were suggesting that government needs to stop doing so much.” Apparently, asking the federal government to do its job in a national emergency but not take over people’s health care is the liberal definition of hypocrisy. Earlier, Mitchell asked Simon to preview the President’s prime time address on the oil spill. Simon gushed: “…he’s cool and collected about things but he also realizes that he has to break through that, and tonight is his chance. You know, speeches have never failed Barack Obama. They started his presidential career. They’ve always rescued him at tough times…. I think he wants to re-establish that personal bond he once had with voters.” He could hardly wait for Obama’s performance: “I think tonight we saw a preview of it in Pensacola. He likes to preview the speeches like opening a play out of town before you go to Broadway.”   Here is a full transcript of the June 15 segment: 1:15PM EST ANDREA MITCHELL: For months a voice has been missing. We’ve been missing the voice of Politico’s chief political columnist Roger Simon. He has been struggling with blood poisoning. He’s now made a welcome recovery and is back stronger than ever, having just had an exclusive interview with the President, and then appeared on Meet the Press and Hardball and you join us now. Roger, it is wonderful to see you. ROGER SIMON: Wonderful to be back with you. MITCHELL: I can’t tell you how happy we are in person and also to read your great interview with President Obama. SIMON: Thank you. MITCHELL: Now you spent time – you’re the only journalist who spent time with the President recently as we prepare for tonight’s big speech. Tell us your impression of how he is handling the crisis and what he wants to project tonight. SIMON: Well, it won’t surprise you to learn that he’s cool and collected about things but he also realizes that he has to break through that, and tonight is his chance. You know, speeches have never failed Barack Obama. They started his presidential career. They’ve always rescued him at tough times and I think tonight we saw a preview of it in Pensacola. He likes to preview the speeches like opening a play out of town before you go to Broadway. And he said in Pensacola, ‘I am with you.’ He didn’t say ‘we are with you.’ He’s making it very personal. And I think he wants to re-establish that personal bond he once had with voters. MITCHELL: Now there’s also a thin-skinned aspect to the President at times. You wrote in the Politico interview, discussing the role of the government in the oil spill, you said some of the same – this is quoting the President – ‘some of the same folks who have been hollering and saying do something are the same folks who, just two or three months ago, were suggesting that government needs to stop doing so much. Some of the same people who were saying the President needs to show leadership and solve this problem are some of the same folks who, just a few months ago, were saying, this guy is trying to engineer a takeover of our society through the federal government that is going to restrict our freedoms.’ So he’s reacting to these criticisms. SIMON: He is. And that troubles him, and that’s one of the two moments I think where he showed a genuine irritation there, and – well, three moments. There, dealing with Congress on the same way: ‘Congress, if I had gone to six months before for extra money they would have said no,’ and also with the press, a continuing irritation of his. When he sees people like Bobby Jindal, you know, standing up, screaming about more federal action, more federal aid, well, six months ago, that’s not the person that Bobby Jindal was. He was a small-government, no federal aid kind of guy. And the President is calling out those people for hypocrisy. MITCHELL: Let me just ask you on a personal note, because you’ve been through Hell and back, and there you are, you’ve covered Barack Obama during the campaign, you’ve had interviews in the past, and now you’re entering the Oval Office in a very different way. They reached out to you. You also reached out to them. But how was it different and how did the President accommodate you? SIMON: I was really nervous. I felt like a summer intern on his first job. I’ve been interviewing people for decades. This felt different. You’re in the Oval Office, you’re in the center of power. And also, I must say, the President was extremely gracious. He didn’t wait in the Oval Office behind his desk for me to come in. He came out and walked down the hallway. He greeted me, we entered together, he turned around his chair to face me. So the task is to be grateful for that, which I was, and also as a journalist to fight it and still ask tough questions. MITCHELL: Well, you did it brilliantly. Roger, we are just so grateful you’re back. SIMON: Oh, I’m so happy to be back with you, Andrea. Thank you for this. MITCHELL: Thank you. And we look forward to other exclusive interviews from you, from Politico. SIMON: Thank you.       

Read the original post:
Politico’s Roger Simon: Obama ‘Calling Out’ Bobby Jindal’s ‘Hypocrisy’

Voices From the Spill: Gulf Coast Fishing Wiped Out For Decades (Video)

By this point, nearly two months since the start of the BP oil spill, you’ve probably seen a lot of video interviews with people from the Gulf Coast telling you how the disaster has r… Read the full story on TreeHugger

Link:
Voices From the Spill: Gulf Coast Fishing Wiped Out For Decades (Video)

Each Year, 75,000 Homes Waste As Much Energy As Contained in Entire BP Gulf Spill

Image via Energy Savvy Despite the fact that the BP Gulf spill continues, with no clear end in sight, many have already concerned themselves with the task of putting the event into the perspective of US energy consumption in general. Case in point: this graphic, which points out that the energy wasted by 75,000 homes a year equals the energy contained in the biggest oil spill in US history. … Read the full story on TreeHugger

Read more:
Each Year, 75,000 Homes Waste As Much Energy As Contained in Entire BP Gulf Spill

Follow-up: AP TV Says Etheridge ‘Mandhandles’ Questioner; Text Coverage Goes Soft

It would appear, based on the graphic tease reproduced at the right and the underlying content, that the folks putting together videos at the Associated Press didn’t get the memo that they should go as soft as possible on North Carolina Democratic Congressman Bob Etheridge. Etheridge arguably committed assault ” last week ” when approached on a public street. The description of what occurred and its aftermath at AP video is quite a bit stronger than what is found in AP Reporter Martha Waggoner’s Monday evening text report , as you will see shortly. Despite having over 400 words with which to work, Waggoner also failed to record a comment — or even a “no comment” — from anyone else in the Democratic Party, or to give any indication that she or anyone else at AP tried to contact House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, any other Democrat in a leadership position, or anyone in the Obama administration. Here’s what the video and accompanying description look like in the AP’s raw video : Now let’s look how Waggoner chose to describe the physical actions that occurred (bolded), and how obsessed she is with the video’s origins: A Democratic congressman apologized Monday after video posted online showed him swatting at the camera , demanding that two men taping him identify themselves and grabbing one of them by the wrist and neck . “I deeply and profoundly regret my reaction and I apologize to all involved,” Rep. Bob Etheridge of North Carolina said in a statement. “No matter how intrusive and partisan our politics can become, this does not justify a poor response.” The video was posted on websites owned by Andrew Breitbart, the conservative Web entrepreneur who also released video of workers for the community organizing group ACORN counseling actors posing as a pimp and prostitute. It shows two men approaching Etheridge with a camera on a Washington street. He swats at the camera and repeatedly asks the men who they are. When they say they are students, he grabs one by the wrist and quickly by the back of the neck before pulling him against his side. … In a telephone interview from London, Breitbart declined to name the students who recorded the video, saying he wanted to protect them. The two do not work for Breitbart and were not paid, he said. A Breitbart employee found the video online, edited it and posted it, he said. A story accompanying the video on a Breitbart website says the video was recorded last week. Etheridge declined to say when the encounter occurred. As was the case with the AP’s unbylined initial report discussed yesterday (at NewsBusters ; at BizzyBlog ), Waggoner did not go to any legal experts to get their opinion as to whether Etheridge’s actions could be seen as an instance of criminal assault. It’s not an argumentative leap to say that the if a Republican or conservative had committed such an action, the AP and other establishment media outlets would not be leaving the GOP leadership and other party members alone, would be giving the incident far more play than it has received thus far, and would likely be using stronger words to describe the physical aspects of what happened. In fact, a post to follow shortly will discuss a shoving incident from three years ago in which a Republican politician was involved that was deemed to be news at a publication where the Etheridge incident was ignored. Stay tuned. Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com .

Originally posted here:
Follow-up: AP TV Says Etheridge ‘Mandhandles’ Questioner; Text Coverage Goes Soft

Matthews Exclaims ‘Tea Partier Declares War!’ Warns of Movement’s ‘Lock and Load Mentality’

Chris Matthews, on Monday’s Hardball, claimed that a Tea Party candidate, in his new ad, had just declared war and warned this was an example of the “lock and load mentality” of “the Tea Party folk.” Matthews, during his Sideshow segment, played a clip from a Rick Barber for Congress ad in which the candidate engages in an imagined conversation with Sam Adams and George Washington in which Barber tells the Founding Fathers how far the government has grown in it scope, with the actor playing Washington saying at the end it’s time to “Gather your armies.” Matthews took this as a sign that Barber was “advocating taking up arms against the government.” Matthews also asserted the tea partiers view the federal government as “a foreign occupying force” and told viewers they can see “more of this sort of thing” on his new documentary “Rise of the Right” to be aired this upcoming Wednesday night on MSNBC. The following teaser, ad clip and Matthews commentary were aired on the June 14 edition of Hardball: CHRIS MATTHEWS: Up next it’s a campaign you have to see to believe! A Republican running for Congress in Alabama, basically is advocating taking up arms against the government. This is the closet thing, well I’m not gonna say it. Well it’s the closest thing to “Let’s revolt!” that I’ve seen. You’re watching Hardball only on MSNBC. … MATTHEWS: Now to the Sideshow. First tonight, a tea partier declares war! Rick Barber, one of the candidates competing in the Republican run-off in Alabama’s second congressional district has just come out with an ad for TV that tells you the true dimension of the Tea Party mentality. The spot begins midway through an imagined meeting with Founding Fathers Sam Adams, Benjamin Franklin, and George Washington. Here it is. (Begin ad clip) RICK BARBER: And I would impeach him. And if that’s not enough, some of you men own taverns. Sam, you were a brewer. Mr. President, a distiller. You know how tough it is to run a small business without a tyrannical government on your back. Today we have an Internal Revenue Service that enforces a progressive income tax. Now the same IRS is gonna force us to buy health insurance, cram it down our throats or else. Now I took an oath to defend that with my life. I can’t stand by while these evils are perpetrated! You gentleman revolted over a tea tax – a tea tax! Now look at us! Are you with me? ACTOR PLAYING GEORGE WASHINGTON: Gather your armies. (End clip) MATTHEWS: Actually Washington put down the Whiskey Rebellion. Well this is the lock and load mentality you just saw there, of the Tea Party folk. They see themselves as involved in a battle with the federal government, which they view is a foreign occupying force, like the British during colonial days. For more on this sort of thing, watch our documentary, Rise of the New Right, this Wednesday at 7:00 o’clock Eastern.

See the rest here:
Matthews Exclaims ‘Tea Partier Declares War!’ Warns of Movement’s ‘Lock and Load Mentality’

On Hardball: Obama Too Cautious About Exerting His Power

Newsweek’s Howard Fineman, on Monday’s Hardball, pushed Barack Obama to “overdo” and “overstep” in his efforts to get BP to plug the leak and stop the oil spill in the Gulf, something Fineman claimed Obama hadn’t done yet because “he’s usefully and rightfully dangerous about power. I think he thought…George W. Bush overstepped in terms of executive power…he’s an observer by nature.” This observation from Fineman seems particularly odd, as it comes at the same time the President has pushed for a $50 billion in additional domestic spending. Fineman made the comment after the Politico’s Roger Simon insisted there’s only so much Obama can do, as he insisted: “He’s not Iron Man. He cannot dive a mile underwater and stop this by himself.” However host Chris Matthews asserted Obama could do more and he asked if the President will be “tough” and “really threaten BP” and openly wondered: “Does he know he’s a powerful man?” After Fineman responded that Obama needs to “overstep” a concerned Matthews questioned: “Even at the risk of being called a socialist again?” The following exchanges were aired on the June 14 edition of Hardball: CHRIS MATTHEWS: I guess the first question is can this president honestly claim he has command and control when it looks like BP is the boss? ROGER SIMON, POLITICO: No, he can’t. And he said in the interview that “We analyzed the problem and we had no greater ability to stop the leak than BP did, so we’re gonna let BP do it.” And he can’t control BP. MATTHEWS: Well looking down the road is BP going to be the big shot, and he’s going to be, as I call him, the Vatican observer watching them do what they do? And that’s all he can do. SIMON: All he can do is threaten them. All he can do is send the attorney general down there. All he can do is threaten to, to depress their stock price to such an extent they’ll go belly up. But that’s all he can do. He’s not Iron Man. He cannot dive a mile underwater and stop this by himself. … MATTHEWS: Howard, the question I have is what can he do? I’m looking back to history. I’m a political person, not an oil person, as we all are. Harry Truman, the coal miners wouldn’t mine coal after World War II. He, he conscripted them all. He drafted them. When Big Steel raised its prices and sort of, Kennedy felt was screwing them, basically, he said “Okay I’m sending the IRS to your house. I’m gonna see if you got any, any action with your secretaries at work.” He was unbelievable! He went after them and said, “Bob McNamara don’t buy any more steel from U.S. Steel.” I mean he was unbelievable. Will this president be that tough? Will he threaten, really threaten BP with all the actions of an Executive? HOWARD FINEMAN, NEWSWEEK: Well if he, if he does he’ll only be dragged kicking and screaming into it because that’s just Barack Obama’s nature. He’s judicious. MATTHEWS: Does he know he’s a powerful man? FINEMAN: He’s, he’s an observer. I think he’s usefully and rightfully dangerous about power. I think he thought George Bush, George W. Bush overstepped in terms of executive power. And it’s also, he’s an observer by nature. But before I continue I just want to say that Roger, whom I’ve known for decades, is the best in the business and we’re so happy to have him back. And, and he’s seen this before. He’s seen presidents who use power or don’t use power. If you don’t use it, you lose it. Barack Obama should overdo. He should overstep. MATTHEWS: Even at the risk of being called a socialist again? FINEMAN: Even at the risk of having a lawsuit filed against him. The Army should be in there. The Navy should be in there. They should- MATTHEWS: Okay you agree with Roger, you agree- FINEMAN: You know, and by the way BP is not in danger of going broke tomorrow. SIMON: Right. FINEMAN: But yet Obama is putting this whole escrow idea out there, so that BP can possibly do its dividend on June 21st.

Go here to see the original:
On Hardball: Obama Too Cautious About Exerting His Power

Poll Finds Americans Think Dems Are Too Liberal, Undermining Media Meme

The legacy media love to paint steadfast conservatives as “far right” “ideologues” who are destroying the GOP’s “big tent” and “purging” moderates. The notion that the Republican Party has drifted too far to the right, however, is contradicted by a new Gallup poll showing that Americans are more concerned about Democrats’ fringe elements. About half (49%) of poll respondents told Gallup that they thought the Democratic Party is too far left. Forty-two percent said the GOP is too far right. The former number is the highest it has been since 1994, when Republicans picked up 54 seats in the House and eight in the Senate. Of course most journalists probably don’t share that sentiment–indeed, a number have bemoaned President Obama’s supposed refusal to move even further to the left. Since those journalists are well outside of the nation’s mainstream, center-right political outlook, they will inevitably see Republicans as too far right and Democrats as moderate and centrist. Hence we have Chris Matthews decrying the “frightening, almost Cambodia re-education camp going on in [the Republican] party, where they’re going around to people, sort of switching their minds around saying, if you’re not far right, you’re not right enough.” There is probably not much hope in showing Matthews the light, but this new Gallup poll should dispel theories such as Mark Halperin’s , that Republicans’ steadfast opposition to the president’s agenda is “unlikely to produce a majority against the administration.” In fact, as long as voters see the Democrats’ agenda as too far to the left, such opposition is likely to pay off in November. Ed Morrissey explains : First, it speaks to voter enthusiasm for Democratic candidates.  They won’t get the kind of turnout in 2010 that they did in 2008 when half of all Americans consider them the extreme.  Independents are the biggest problem; in 2008, when Democrats extended their control of Congress and took the White House, independents were narrowly split 43/40 in thinking that the Democratic Party ideological position was “about right.”  Now they have a 19-point deficit among independents, 33/52. They have even lost 10 points among Democrats for “about right” in the last two years, although that got evenly split between “too conservative” and “too liberal.” Second, Obama and Democratic leadership have already hinted that they want to argue in the midterms  that Republicans are the real extremists.  That argument would have worked, according to Gallup’s data, until Democrats started pushing ObamaCare through Congress.  At that point, a plurality of voters thought the GOP was too conservative as opposed to “about right,” 43/34.  That has shifted to 40/41, while Democrats have gone from a “too liberal/about right” split of 46/42 to 49/38 in the same period.  They’re not going to win a debate over extremism, not while rolling up debt like a college freshman with his first Visa card.

Go here to see the original:
Poll Finds Americans Think Dems Are Too Liberal, Undermining Media Meme

Journalistic Instincts: In Alleged Etheridge Assault, Who Does AP Want to Talk To?

A sitting congressman allegedly commits assault on a public sidewalk, is caught on video doing so (link is to the related Eyeblast.tv video and blog post), and ” apologizes .” Note that the incident took place ” last week ,” according to the linked BigGovernment.com post, which means that Etheridge didn’t see the need for an apology until the video went viral. So … who does the intrepid Associated Press attempt to go to for comment? The Congressman? Apparently not, as you will see; the AP must see his “apology” as the end of the story. The person whom Etheridge arguably assaulted? Legal experts, who could weigh in on whether the congressman could be arrested and and charged ? House or Democratic Party colleagues? No-no-no. Get a load, in the final paragraph of what will probably end up being a brief initial report , of who the AP believes owes it a comment first and foremost: Yeah, that’s right. Andrew Breitbart. You have to wonder, especially since they felt compelled to bring up the ACORN sting videos, if the folks at AP check under their beds at night for vast right wing conspirators before turning in. Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com .

Read more:
Journalistic Instincts: In Alleged Etheridge Assault, Who Does AP Want to Talk To?