Tag Archives: consumer

Does Senate Bill 510 Put Raw Milk in Real Danger?

Graphic courtesy Farm to Consumer Legal Defense Fund . Today the U.S. Senate passed Senate Bill 510, the Food Safety Modernization Act. After the recent scandal with eggs , and all of the other food safety issues of recent years ( meat , peanut butter , s… Read the full story on TreeHugger

Go here to see the original:
Does Senate Bill 510 Put Raw Milk in Real Danger?

FDA will Ban Food Makers from Telling the Truth about Non-GMO Foods

(NaturalNews) In case anyone had any doubts about who the FDA really serves, the latest news should prove once and for all whose side they are on – and it isn't yours or mine. The Washington Post has reported that, in addition to ultimately approving genetically modified “Frankenfish” salmon without requiring a GMO label, the FDA will also be banning the inclusion of any references to not containing genetically modified content on food items which are GMO free. The FDA, which has been under intense pressure from GM interests to approve the modified salmon without requiring any labeling, stated that it could not require a label on the salmon because the agency determined that the altered fish are not “materially different” from other salmon. Apparently, the agency is using even the same, and even flimsier, justifications to force food companies to hide the truth if their products are GM/GMO free – much to the delight of the multi-billion dollar GM industries. We should have seen such an outrageous decision coming, given the FDA's past record and continued turn away from protecting consumers' health in favor of industry profits from drug and food companies who are obviously its true clients and masters. In 1994 the agency warned the dairy industry that it could not use “Hormone Free” labeling on milk from cows that are not given engineered hormones. It claimed all milk contains some hormones. The FDA told one canola oil maker that it could not use a label that included a red circle with a line through it and the words “GMO,” saying the symbol suggested that there was something wrong with genetically engineered food. It has also recently sent a flurry of enforcement letters to food makers telling them they could not use phrases such as “GMO-free” on their labels, including a food maker which produces an all fruit strawberry spread. In the case of the strawberry spread, the FDA reasoned that the label would be incorrect because GMO refers to genetically modified organisms and strawberries are produce, not organisms. “This to me raises questions about whose interest the FDA is protecting,” House Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) told the Washington Post. Kucinich has repeatedly introduced bills in the House that would require the labeling of genetically modified food but has been unable to overcome the money and influence of the GMO lobbies and companies. The FDA's anticipated actions come at a time when consumers increasingly want to know the content of their foods. In fact, polls consistently show that more than 80% of Americans want genetically engineered foods to be labeled. It also comes at a time when more and more studies are demonstrating the health and environmental dangers of GMO foods. “The public wants to know and the public has a right to know,” New York University nutrition professor Marion Nestle told the Post. “I think the agency has discretion, but it's under enormous political pressure to approve [the salmon] without labeling.” Not surprisingly, the GM industry agrees wholeheartedly with the FDA. As one director of animal biotechnology said, “Extra labeling only confuses the consumer. … It differentiates products that are not different [and] makes it harder for consumers to make their choices.” In other words, make it easier for consumers to make choices by limiting their information. Forget about health dangers, our right to know, or the constitutional rights to free speech (which the Supreme Court has ruled includes commercial free speech in anti-FDA decisions). The FDA simply wants to protect us poor consumers from being confused. Who do you think the FDA is really protecting? ~~~ Here's more about the man who is now, thanks to Obama and his debt to Monsanto, in charge of your food safety http://www.grist.org/article/2009-07-08-monsanto-FDA-taylor added by: samantha420

What Republicans Don’t Want Voters To Know About Jobs, Jobs, Jobs

When Bush pushed CAFTA through Congress, it was a very close win for the GOP's Big Business allies. The final vote was 217-215( http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2005/roll443.xml ). Although 187 Democrats voted against it– only 15 joining the Republicans in favor– Boehner, Blunt, Cantor, Ryan delivered for their corporate masters once again. For the last month Boehner has been running around the country like a bright orange chicken without a head squawking, “Where are the jobs, Mr. President?” It's an ironic question coming from one of the engineers responsible for passing trade policies that have systematically decimated the basis of America's manufacturing base. Boehner and his cronies– their wallets fat with gargantuan payoffs from outsourcers– have voted for every single bad trade bill that has ever promised to ship American jobs overseas. For Boehner to publicly ask where the jobs are is a slap in the face to every American worker and an insult to the intelligence of every Ohio voter. In the Senate, Obama looked at the exact same CAFTA bill Boehner and the Republicans did. Then-Senator Obama voted against it. ( http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?con… ) Several conservative Senate Republicans voted NO as well (John Thune, Lindsey Graham, David Vitter, Mike Enzi, Richard Shelby…) but voting to send American jobs to slave wage economies: Jim DeMint, Richard Burr, Mike DeWine, Chuck Grassley, Blanche Lincoln, John McCain, Ben Nelson and, of course Miss McConnell. All the Democrats voted against it with the exception of a small handful of corporate whores who habitually vote with the GOP against working families. But let's go back to the House for a moment, where every member has to face the voters in November. Why are Ohio voters thinking of reelecting John Boehner, who has screwed them on WTO, screwed them on CAFTA, screwed them on NAFTA and has the temerity to be boosting plans for more unbalanced trade legislation with a handful of more low-wage countries. I know he wants to destroy the standard of living of American workers and make them into serfs but who does he think will be buying American goods and services to keep our consumer-driven economy afloat if there are no decent jobs? Not everyone can be a caddy or bartender! Instead of asking Justin Coussoule for another quote about Boehner's record on jobs and how it has devastated businesses and the economy from Butler County up through Darke, Miami and Mercer, we took a look at a perfectly framed ad by Rob Miller, the former marine running against Joe “You Lie” Wilson. Although South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham warned that CAFTA would be disastrous for South Carolina's textile industry and small businesses (and voted NO), at the last minute Wilson was persuaded by Boehner's slick blandishments and voted YES, along with Gresham Barrett and Bob Inglis, both of whom have been disposed of by tea party activists. Miller's TV ad should leave Wilson reeling: ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JUWs7IlR020 ) We caught up with Rob this morning and asked him if Wilson, just one Member of Congress, really hurt South Carolina with his vote. We knew the answer but we wanted to see how Rob would put it. He put it well: > When Joe Wilson went to Congress in December 2001, South Carolina’s > unemployment rate was 5.7 percent. Today, 10.8 percent of > South Carolinians are without jobs, including 112,500 people who > have lost their manufacturing jobs. > Manufacturing was the backbone of South Carolina’s economy, until > unfair trade deals like CAFTA went into effect. CAFTA sent thousands > of our jobs overseas, and people all across the state knew that > would happen before the first vote was cast. > But that didn’t stop Joe Wilson. Joe Wilson voted for CAFTA and broke > his promise to protect South Carolina’s workers, sending their jobs to > Central America. The real insult is that Joe Wilson cast the deciding > vote for CAFTA. If Wilson voted “No” CAFTA would not have passed. > It was that simple, and Joe Wilson didn’t have the courage to do what’s > right. South Carolina towns are dying– people are struggling to put > food on the table– and it all comes down to Joe Wilson turning his back > on South Carolina’s workers by voting “Yes” for CAFTA. I hope lots of Democrats watch Rob's ad. Similar ones would be especially effective against Roy Blunt (R-MO), Mike Castle (R-DE), Mark Kirk (R-IL), and John Boozman (R-AR) four particularly corrupt Wall Street darlings who are all trying to upgrade from the House to the Senate. It may also be useful for Democrats in New Hampshire, Pennsylvania and New Mexico to keep in mind as Charlie Bass, Mike Fitzpatrick and Steve Pearce try to slip back into office without letting voters know they were major players in the battles to pass CAFTA and similarly toxic trade bills. added by: toyotabedzrock

Smile! Aerial images being used to enforce laws

Aug 14, 12:17 PM EDT Smile! Aerial images being used to enforce laws By FRANK ELTMAN Associated Press Writer AP Photo AP Photo Buy AP Photo Reprints RIVERHEAD, N.Y. (AP) — On New York's Long Island, it's used to prevent drownings. In Greece, it's a tool to help solve a financial crisis. Municipalities update property assessment rolls and other government data with it. Some in law enforcement use it to supplement reconnaissance of crime suspects. High-tech eyes in the sky – from satellite imagery to sophisticated aerial photography that maps entire communities – are being employed in creative new ways by government officials, a trend that civil libertarians and others fear are eroding privacy rights. “As technology advances, we have to revisit questions about what is and what is not private information,” said Gregory Nojeim, senior counsel at the Washington, D.C.-based Center for Democracy and Technology. Online services like Google and Bing give users very detailed images of practically any location on the planet. Though some images are months old, they make it possible for someone sitting in a living room in Brooklyn to look in on folks in Dublin or Prague, or even down the street in Flatbush. Sean Walter, an attorney and first-term town supervisor in Riverhead, N.Y., insists he is a staunch defender of privacy rights and the Fourth Amendment, which protects against unreasonable search and seizure. But Walter supported using Google Earth images to help identify about 250 Riverhead homes where residents failed to get building permits certifying their swimming pools complied with safety regulations. All but about 10 eventually came to town hall. Walter said the focus was safety, not filling town coffers with permit money, which averaged about $150 depending on the size of the pool. A 4-foot fence is required, gates have to be self-closing and padlocked. All pools must have an alarm that sounds when sensors are activated indicating someone is in the pool. “We have a town employee who is a personal friend of mine whose son was found face-down in a swimming pool,” Walter said. “He's OK, but I don't want to be the supervisor that attends the funeral of a child that drowns in a swimming pool.” Lillie Coney, associate director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center in Washington, D.C., fears that while Walter's focus was safety, other municipalities may use the images to check for other transgressions. “It's only a matter of time,” Coney said. “There are lots of ordinances where this can be used. In California, where they deal with brush fires, could a satellite image show if a homeowner has brush growing too close to his home? What if someone has junk cars on their lot in violation of ordinances?” Riverhead resident Tony Villar said the town's action “could be considered Big Brother looking down at you.” “But at the same time, if the government can listen to your telephone conversations in the name of terrorism,” he said. http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_EYES_IN_THE_SKY?SITE=TXKER&SECTION… Standing outside the Riverhead Public Library, Walter Casey of Flanders agreed. “I think it's a great intrusion on people's privacy; they should use it on the politicians' backyards.” The New York Civil Liberties Union's Donna Lieberman said there are ways to enforce requirements “without this sort of engaging in Big Brother on high. Technically, it may be lawful, but in the gut it does not feel like a free society kind of operation.” In Greece, officials are struggling with a debt crisis and have sought to catch tax-evaders by using satellite photos to spot undeclared swimming pools – indicators of taxable wealth. Google spokeswoman Kate Hurowitz said in a statement that Google Earth acquires its information from a broad range of commercial and public sources. “The same information is available to anyone who buys it from these widely available public sources,” she said. “Google's freely available technology has been used for a variety of purposes, ranging from travel planning to scientific research to emergency response, rescue and relief in natural disasters such as Hurricane Katrina and the Haiti earthquake.” At least nine lawsuits seeking class-action status have been filed in the United States, contending that Google collected fragments of e-mails, Web-surfing data and other information from unencrypted wireless networks as it photographed neighborhoods for its “Street View” feature. Google is also facing investigations or inquiries in 38 states as well as in several countries, including Germany, Spain and Australia. The Mountain View, Calif., company said in May it had inadvertently collected the data from public Wi-Fi networks in more than 30 countries, but maintains it never used the data and hasn't broken any laws. Google Earth posts updates about every two weeks on selected images from its providers, with images ranging from a few weeks to a few years old. For big cities like Chicago, tracking illegal pools, porches and decks through Google Earth requires frequent imaging updates, so the Chicago buildings department uses it as a reference tool on a case-by-case scenario, said spokesman Bill McCaffrey. “We're not opposed to adopting new technology, but until it advances where we can get photos of more recent updates, we don't have any plans to implement it,” he said. Smaller towns such as Champaign and Naperville, Ill. opted to use satellite images as reference only. “Mostly it's so we can see that we're going to the right building when we go to do inspections,” said Ann Michalsen, lead inspector for code enforcement in Naperville. It's also important for police officers to know they have the right destination when executing search warrants, said Joe Pollini, a professor at John Jay College of Criminal Justice. “Most departments would use it as a preliminary step, but they would also use active surveillance with their own aircraft,” he said. The nonprofit group Consumer Watchdog is seeking to determine the extent of the FBI and Drug Enforcement Administration's use of Google Earth in its investigations, spokesman John M. Simpson said last week. Federal contracting records reviewed by Consumer Watchdog show that the FBI has spent more than $600,000 on Google Earth since 2007. The Drug Enforcement Administration, meanwhile, has spent more than $67,000. Simpson has called on Congress to investigate how U.S. law enforcement and intelligence communities are using Google technologies. The group says it has concerns that data could be used for racial profiling. The New York Police Department's Real Time Crime Center uses satellite imaging and computerized mapping systems to identify geographic patterns of crimes and to pinpoint possible addresses where suspects might flee – information relayed to investigators on the street. The NYPD also has two major security initiatives where a network of public and private cameras will eventually link and be searchable. The NYCLU has filed lawsuits in opposition. “We live in an environment where we are told that if it's on camera, if you have a video record, that will make us safer,” Lieberman said. “That may be appealing, but it is an unproven assertion. There's no evidence of that. Yet we see millions, if not billions, of post-9/11 money has gone to law enforcement for installing cameras in every conceivable nook and cranny.” http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_EYES_IN_THE_SKY?SITE=TXKER&SECTION… added by: DefKid

Biogas From Waste, Direct to the Consumer: It’s Vegan Too!

Image credit: Ecotricity As I wrote last week, just because bio-gas is made from biodegradable sources doesn’t mean it has no impact —and some activists are increasingly worried that demand for biogas will eventually lead to deforestation and other resource depletion issues. So they’ll be pleased to know that Ecotricity, the folks who are now selling biogas direct to British consumers , have made a public commitment to only buy gas made from resources that… Read the full story on TreeHugger

Originally posted here:
Biogas From Waste, Direct to the Consumer: It’s Vegan Too!

China’s Fight Against Disposable Chopsticks | 100 Acres of Trees Are Felled Every 24 Hours

China's fight against disposable chopsticks To keep up with demand, 100 acres of trees need to be felled every 24 hours. But efforts to restrain the use of disposable wooden chopsticks face many obstacles. By Daniel K. Gardner August 15, 2010 China's Ministry of Commerce, together with five other ministries, issued this warning in June: “Companies making disposable chopsticks will face local government restrictions aimed at decreasing the use of the throwaway utensil…. Production, circulation and recycling of disposable chopsticks should be more strictly supervised.” With summer floods devastating southern, western and northeastern China, a massive oil spill smothering the Yellow Sea off the port of Dalian, 3,000 barrels of chemicals bobbing aimlessly but threateningly in the Songhua River in the northeast, and nearly half a million newly registered cars — just since January — on Beijing roads spewing who knows how much additional carbon dioxide into the air, you may think that the government is unnecessarily overreaching in waging a war on the disposable chopstick. But start doing the math and the disposable chopstick, made largely from birch and poplar (and, less so, from bamboo, because of its higher cost) begins to look deeply menacing — an environmental disaster not to be taken lightly. Begin with China's 1.3 billion people. In one year, they go through roughly 45 billion pairs of the throwaway utensils; that averages out to nearly 130 million pairs of chopsticks a day. (The export market accounts for 18 billion pairs annually.) Greenpeace China has estimated that to keep up with this demand, 100 acres of trees need to be felled every 24 hours. Think here of a forest larger than Tiananmen Square — or 100 American football fields — being sacrificed every day. That works out to roughly 16 million to 25 million felled trees a year. Deforestation is one of China's gravest environmental problems, leading to soil erosion, famine, flooding, carbon dioxide release, desertification and species extinction. Get the best in Southern California opinion journalism delivered to your inbox with our Opinion L.A. newsletter. Sign up

New Taylor Swift Single: Thumbs Up or Down?

Taylor Swift has unleashed her latest single online. The talented young singer has set October 25 as the release date for her new album and has now given fans a chance to listen to “Mine.” Of the song, Taylor has said it’s an ode to her lousy love life, sharing: “[It’s about] my tendency to run from love. It’s a recent tendency. Every example of love in my life has ended in goodbye. The song is about finding the exception to that.” Might actor Toby Hemingway be that exception? Ponder that question as you listen and vote below: Mine What do you think of the single?

Read more here:
New Taylor Swift Single: Thumbs Up or Down?

Jillian Michaels Sued for Dangerous Diet Product

Is Jillian Michaels trying to kill us? Possibly, according to a new lawsuit filed against the celebrity trainer. A woman referred to as “R.D.” in documents has filed a class action lawsuit in Los Angeles County Superior Court that claims Jillian’s Triple Process Total Body Detox & Cleanse diet supplement contains a “potentially lethal combination of toxic ingredients. Also, it “might kill you.” Hmmm… can we feed it to Mel Gibson ? Among the ingredients the lawsuit singles out, as first reported by TMZ, are: Irish Moss Powder because it “causes gastrointestinal ulcers” and is “so toxic that it is the gel commonly applied to aircraft wings to dissolve ice.” Bearberry, which is “known to cause nausea and vomiting.” Yarrow, described as “a toxic lawn weed that causes dermatitis” Chinese Rhubarb, “a harsh laxative and dangerous diuretic that can cause sever dehydration and may cause irreversible liver damage” R.D. is seeking $10 million for the conspiracy she alleges is behind the attempt to hide these products from the consumer. This is the fourth time Jillian has been sued for potentially toxic supplement ingredients. Please just take our advice, people: if you wish to lose weight, eat in moderation and exercise. That’s really the only healthy way to do it.

Originally posted here:
Jillian Michaels Sued for Dangerous Diet Product

Google, scarrier than we all think.

SANTA MONICA, Calif., July 19 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ — Citing new information about Google's classified government contracts and the Internet giant's admitted Wi-Spying activity, Consumer Watchdog today said it is more imperative than ever for the Energy and Commerce Committee to conduct hearings into possible privacy violations by Google. In a letter to Committee Chairman Henry Waxman and Ranking Member Joe Barton, the nonpartisan, nonprofit public interest group's John M. Simpson wrote: “Based on today's Washington Post, it appears that Google holds classified U.S. government contracts to supply search and geospatial information to the U.S. government. In addition, White House records show that Google executives have been holding meetings with U.S. national security officials for undisclosed reasons. Finally, it also appears that Google's widely criticized efforts to collect wireless network data on American citizens were not inadvertent, contrary to the company's claims.” “As history has repeatedly shown, alliances between the U.S. intelligence community and giant corporations that collect data on American citizens can be a toxic combination where the U.S. Constitution is concerned,” the letter said. In a June 9 letter to the Energy and Commerce Committee, Google director for public policy Pablo Chavez asserted that Google “mistakenly included code in our software that collected samples of 'payload data'” from private WiFi networks. But review of a patent application from Google covering the gathering of WiFi data published Jan. 28 shows that the data collection program was a very deliberate effort to assemble as much information as possible about U.S. residential and business WiFi networks. The letter continued: “…what the patent does show is that Google's recent claims about how the Street View program was designed are not accurate, and that the company always intended to collect and store the 'packets' of wireless data that contain so-called payload information. “The patent makes repeated reference to 'capturing' packets, including paragraph [0055], which states that the system will enable geolocations so long as the equipment being used 'is able to capture and properly decode a packet…' “This raises serious questions about whether Google has engaged in a reckless effort to amass private data without giving any thought to the possible misuse of that information, and whether it can be trusted to safeguard the information it collects from the prying eyes of the U.S. government.” Read the patent here: http://insidegoogle.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/US20100020776.pdf Read the letter here: http://insidegoogle.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/LtrWaxman071910.pdf In addition, White House visitor logs show that Alan Davidson, Google's Director of Public Policy and Government Affairs, has had at least three meetings with officials of the National Security Council since the beginning of last year. One of the meetings was with White House senior director for Russian affairs Mike McFaul, while another was with Middle East advisor Daniel Shapiro. It has also been widely reported that Google has been working in “partnership” with the National Security Agency, the very same government body that illegally intercepted the private communications of millions of Americans during the Bush administration http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/googles-wi-spying-and-intelligence-ties-… added by: littlwarrior

China in Denial About Becoming World’s Largest Energy Consumer

photo: Dieter Weinelt via flickr China passed the United States in terms of national carbon emissions a couple years back, and according to new data from the International Energy Agency also just passed the US in terms of total energy consumption. That doesn’t quite fit with China’s cultivated image of still being a developing economy in need of special international privileges, so it’s denying that the IEA figures paint a true picture. … Read the full story on TreeHugger

See the article here:
China in Denial About Becoming World’s Largest Energy Consumer