Tag Archives: country

‘Waiting For Superman’ Can Bring ‘Real Change,’ Stars Say At Premiere

‘A lot of people drop off their kids and hope for the best when they go to school,’ Cheryl Hines tells MTV News. By Kara Warner Cheryl Hines at the “Waiting for Superman” premiere Photo: MTV News LOS ANGELES — It’s already taken the Sundance Film Festival by storm — both with critics and audiences — creating buzz from within the U.S. Department of Education, and it has found major-league celeb support from the likes of Oprah Winfrey and Bill Gates. So what more can “Waiting for Superman,” Davis Guggenheim’s glaring examination of our nation’s school system do? MTV News hit up the film’s L.A. premiere Monday to find out. “The movie has a chance to help change our schools,” Guggenheim said. “We really need to do it. I think our schools are in big trouble — not just in schools ‘over there’; schools everywhere are in trouble. It’s a great film, because it brings people together to see it, and it also shows people that it’s possible to give every kid in America a great education. That’s what’s so exciting: It brings people together around this issue [to] make real change.” “Superman” supporter L.A. Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa agreed, equating the film’s impact on education to that of Guggenheim’s last film, “An Inconvenient Truth.” “This movie has got to be a catalyst for real change. It’s got to do for education what ‘An Inconvenient Truth’ did for climate change and the struggle to educate people about global warming,” Villaraigosa said. “This is the pre-eminent challenge facing America. It is the civil-rights issue of our time. When you look at the kids in urban schools, the level with which they’re dropping out and the abysmal success rate of our urban public schools.” “I think this film and our show ‘School Pride’ will be eye-opening for a lot of people in this country,” actress and “School Pride” host/ executive producer Cheryl Hines said. “I think a lot of people have no idea how bad it is, and I think a lot of people drop off their kids and hope for the best when they go to school. Now is the time to really show people what is happening and inspire them to do something about it.” For more information about the film and how to help schools within your cities and neighborhoods, visit WaitingForSuperman.com . Check out everything we’ve got on “Waiting for Superman.” For breaking news, celebrity columns, humor and more — updated around the clock — visit MTVMoviesBlog.com .

Read the original here:
‘Waiting For Superman’ Can Bring ‘Real Change,’ Stars Say At Premiere

President Ahmedinejad Threatens U.S. With War ‘Without Boundaries’

Iranian President Says Country Will Defend Its Nuclear Facilities Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmedinejad warned the Obama administration today that if Iran's nuclear facilities are attacked, the U.S. will face a war that “would know no boundaries.” The Iranian president, who is in New York for the annual meetings of the United Nations General Assembly, spoke at a breakfast meeting with reporters and editors at Manhattan's Warwick Hotel. He said that Iran is on the brink of becoming a nuclear power, and warned Israel and the U.S. against attacking its nuclear facilities. Asked about the possibility of a U.S.-supported Israeli air strike against Iran, the fiery Iranian leader said an attack would be considered an act of war, and suggested the U.S. is unprepared for the consequences. Such a war “would know no boundaries,” Ahmedinejad said. “War is not just bombs.” Iran claims it has no plans to make a nuclear weapon, but the country is faced with United Nations sanctions, spearheaded by the U.S., meant to convince Iran to comply with international regulations and abandon its nuclear program. In a wide-ranging question-and-answer session, Ahmedinejad said he was prepared to meet with the Obama administration, but that “the whole outlook has to shift.” Sanctions in particular, he said, had damaged the chances for an improvement in U.S.-Iranian relations. He took some credit for last week's release of Sarah Shourd, one of three American hikers who were jailed 14 months ago and accused of espionage. The decision to free Shourd, he said, was a judgment made by the judiciary and by Ahmedinejad himself. “A combination of both” a judicial act and an act of sympathy, he said. Shourd, who still faces charges, had to guarantee a $500,000 bond before she was released. Her fiance and and another male friend remain in Iranian custody. Ahmedinejad acknowledged the possibility that Palestinian leaders may ultimately make peace with Israel, he questioned the legitimacy of Palestinian negotiators and raised questions about the Holocaust that have marked his tenure as president. http://www.prisonplanet.com/president-ahmedinejad-threatens-u-s-with-war-without… added by: im1mjrpain

Activist and Anchor Contessa Brewer Warns of ‘Consequences’ for Opposing Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell Repeal

MSNBC anchor and gay rights activist Contessa Brewer on Tuesday warned of “consequences” for senators who oppose repealing the ban on gays serving openly in the military. In the 12pm hour, she speculated, ” …My big question here, will there be consequences, especially for moderates who refuse to repeal Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell? ” [MP3 audio here .] Later in the News Live show, Brewer interviewed Daniel Choi, an ex-Army lieutenant who was discharged under the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell policy. Brewer repeated her prediction, citing the planned vote of Senator Susan Collins: “Will there be consequences for her this afternoon if she votes to block the procedure moving forward?” Despite reporting on gay rights issues, the journalist has also lobbied for political change. On July 24, 2010, she appeared at a fundraiser in Kentucky. A press release touted, “As the evening’s featured guest, MSNBC’s Brewer, who has several family ties to Kentucky, will speak on the need for a statewide anti-discrimination Fairness law in the Commonwealth from a national news perspective.” On July 12 , the supposedly neutral anchor implored, “My big question today: Why aren’t more American leaders itching for a fight on gay rights?” Choi has repeatedly been the go-to guest for Brewer to tout the wrongness of Don’t Ask, Don’t tell. In addition to Tuesday, he appeared as a guest on September 10 and July 12. A transcript of the September 21 segment can be found below: 12:03 CONTESSA BREWER: The Senate is set to vote on whether to move forward on the Don’t Ask, Don’t tell repeal 2:30 p.m. eastern. We’ll watch for it. We’ll bring it to you when it happens. Given all the issues our country is facing today, of course my big question here, will there be consequences, especially for moderates who refuse to repeal Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell? I’d like to hear your thoughts on Twitter, on Facebook. 12:35pm CONTESSA BREWER: Dan Choi was discharged from the army for being openly gay. And, so here you had Lady Gaga drawing attention to Maine and the role of these moderate Republican Senators, Senator Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins. We just saw, Lieutenant Choi, Susan Collins on the floor of the House. She says she supports a repeal of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, but she doesn’t like the way Congress and the Democrats are going about seeing the repeal passed. Will there be consequences for her this afternoon if she votes to block the procedure moving forward? DANIEL CHOI (Former U.S. Army Lt.): Yes. There will be consequences, Contessa, for all of us because whenever you continue a policy of discrimination, there are dire consequences for the fabric of what makes America what it is. And, although it’s difficult for me to follow Lady Gaga, I want to say she’s been a great leader in this. I some of our politicians can speak up you loudly and forthrightly as she has. BREWER: I want to read what McCain has to say about this. He says, and he’s kind of been the one pushing for a filibuster of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell. He says it’s “pushing for a vote on the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell law before the Defense Department has concluded its survey of the opinions of our force on an important matter that will directly affect them and their families.” I’m getting a lot of E-mails in, Dan, from people who have served or are serving in the military. Both sides here, some saying, no, gays should not be allowed to openly serve and some saying it’s absolutely time to overhaul this policy. Do the survey results at all change- would it change your view about whether it’s a valid policy? CHOI: It’s absolutely an invalid- it’s absolutely a destructive policy. You don’t need a survey to understand that discrimination is anti-American. I don’t know if any of the people conducting the survey took a look at the other countries in the world. They conducted polls and many people said the same thing that Senator McCain and many other elected officials are saying, that there’s going to be some kind of negative impact. Contessa, whenever you have a unit or a team that prizes honesty, and integrity, that supports all families, not just straight families, but all families, you have an increase in cohesion. You have an increase in community. You have an increase in the strength of an organization. Repealing Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell is going to do nothing but strengthen our communities and our families and our country. BREWER: Let me ask you, and some of the e-mails I get that do not support the repeal of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell from former or current military members, this is the argument they make: I want you to address this since you served in the military. They say, what happens when a gay military member hits on a straight military member and then the gay military member gets punched in the face? Does that happen? Do gay- do gay soldiers hit on straight soldiers? CHOI: Well- Well, I think what — let me just be really clear about this. When a gay soldier exists in a unit, 99 percent of the time, they’re not spending their time hitting on other soldiers. There’s probably a fear that when a gay soldier exists that the other soldiers will say, “Oh, maybe I’m gay, too,” And that’s what’s at the bottom of this kind of thinking, this kind of illogic. And those incidents that people are bringing up never happened when I was openly gay in an infantry unit for over a year and a half. It it’s common for a lot of people to focus on, you know, these pretend incidents that they will say will be widespread and they’ll create a sense of fear. But I’m not buying it. I’m not tricked by it. And I don’t think anybody who pays attention to your program should be tricked by it either.

Follow this link:
Activist and Anchor Contessa Brewer Warns of ‘Consequences’ for Opposing Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell Repeal

End to Corporate News? – Worldwide Hippies Opens News Bureau!

Brothers and Sisters: Main stream media is bought and sold by corporations with their own agenda. Worldwide Hippies is looking for the few, the brave and the cool. Be the eyes and the ears from your country, state, city or town. If you are interested in setting up a news bureau for WWH and can produce on a weekly basis. Contact joe@worldwidehippies.com added by: joeeddy

Joe Scarborough Rips Liberal MSNBC Colleagues Schultz and Olbermann On-Air

Does he want to lose his job at MSNBC the way Donny Deutsch did ? Joe Scarborough seems to have a devil-may-care attitude towards criticizing his outspoken colleagues, liberal blowhards Ed Schultz and Keith Olbermann. Simply refer to past episodes here , here , here and here . While not mentioning them by name on today’s “Morning Joe,” Scarborough featured outlandish barbs from his colleagues Schultz and Olbermann as examples of what not to do in trying to “keep calm and carry on,” as the show was trying to preach to its viewers. For the second straight day, MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” ran a segment titled “Keep Calm and Carry On” – Scarborough’s favored slogan of late, he even features in his profile picture on his Twitter account – dedicated to throwing water on the political fire created by the fringe Left and Right and promoting more calm, moderate, bipartisan candidates and positions. Tuesday’s segment featured a game show format where Joe and co-host Mika Brzezinski asked questions with obvious answers – for instance, does such-and-such rabid quotation by such-and-such talk show blowhard merit the label “Keep Calm and Carry On?” Scarborough’s second question began thus: “If you’re a liberal radio and TV talk show host, and your goal is to keep calm and carry on, do you say of a Republican politician who’s just had a life-threatening heart attack, quote, ‘We ought to rip his heart out, and kick it around, and stuff it back in his chest’?” That question referred to Ed Schultz’s nasty rant from this past February, where he derided conservatives for complaining that Dick Cheney’s recovery from his heart attack was being used as a political football for health care. “You’re damn right Dick Cheney’s heart is a political football,” Schultz ranted. “We ought to rip it out and kick it around and stuff it back in him. I’m glad he didn’t tip over. He is the new poster child for health care in this country.” Two questions later, Scarborough again used an MSNBC colleague’s words as an example of hate-speech. “If you’re a liberal cable host, and you want to keep calm and carry on, do you accuse the President of the United States, who happens to be a Republican, of being a fascist, and a liar, who urinates on the Constitution?” he asked columnist Mike Barnacle. That question referred back to Olbermann’s August, 2008 smear of President Bush’s administration as “urinating on the Constitution.” It seems quite fascinating that out of all the hate speech from liberal talk show hosts on radio and television, Scarborough chose to feature barbs from two of his colleagues. Then again, MSNBC isn’t exactly a harbor of calm and collected debate. A partial transcript of the segment, which aired on September 21 at 6:43 a.m. EDT, is as follows: JOE SCARBOROUGH: Calling out the “Professional Left” and the far-Right, a campaign of ours to kind of calm everybody down, because we find – and we found out in New Hampshire this past weekend, we’ve seen it everywhere from Maine down to South Alabama, to Florida, to Alabama, to West – Americans are tired of all the screaming and shouting, so we’re trying to encourage sort of the chattering classes – to keep calm, and carry on. A noble gesture, is it not? JON MEACHAM: Absolutely. I would expect nothing less. (…) SCARBOROUGH: Question: If you’re a liberal radio and TV talk show host, and your goal is to keep calm and carry on, do you say of a Republican politician who’s just had a life-threatening heart attack, quote, “We ought to rip his heart out, and kick it around, and stuff it back in his chest.” MIKA BRZEZINSKI: That’s a no-brainer, Willie. WILLIE GEIST: Life-threatening, or did it cost him his life? SCARBOROUGH: Life-threatening. He’s still alive – these guys aren’t very good at this. BRZEZINSKI: It’s a new game. GEIST: Yes. SCARBOROUGH: No. GEIST: You said “threatening.” SCARBOROUGH: “Life-threatening.” No, I’m sorry. (…) SCARBOROUGH: Question: For the t-shirt. If you’re a liberal cable host, and you want to keep calm and carry on, do you accuse the President of the United States, who happens to be a Republican, of being a fascist, and a liar, who urinates on the Constitution? Now Mike, I would suggest that “urinates on the Constitution,” as well as “liar” and “fascist,” would be a clue for you. MIKE BARNACLE: It is, it is, and I don’t need a lifeline for this one. Yes. (Pause) C’mon, give me the t-shirt. That was the right answer, wasn’t it? It happens all the time! SCARBOROUGH: It does happen all the time. We have, actually, some re-educating to do. BRZEZINSKI: We do.

See the original post:
Joe Scarborough Rips Liberal MSNBC Colleagues Schultz and Olbermann On-Air

George Stephanopoulos Fawns Over Old Boss Bill Clinton: What New Project Excites You?

Interviewing Bill Clinton for Tuesday’s Good Morning America, George Stephanopoulos’ nine minute segment mostly amounted to a strategy session that was devoid of tough questions. Stephanopoulos stuck to softball comments, such as inquiring of the Clinton Global Initiative: ” And I began by asking President Clinton, which new project most excites him? ” Some people, if they were interviewing their former boss, might feel an extra responsibility to ask probing, grueling questions. Instead, Stephanopoulos brought up Sarah Palin: “Is she qualified to be president?” He followed up, “What’s your gut on that?” The former Democratic operative turned journalist could have pressed the ex-President about the details of his charity, the Clinton Global Initiative (CGI). Considering that the international group deals with several world leaders, he might have asked if there was any conflict of interest for Bill Clinton’s Secretary of State wife. Stephanopoulos could have queried as to the funding for CGI. He did not. The two did discuss how Barack Obama could win back his falling popularity: “You and President Obama get set up as polar opposites. Everybody used to hit you for ‘Mr. I feel your pain.’ And everybody says now, the conventional wisdom, he’s too remote. Too detached. How does he get that gut connection with the American people back?” This interview with Bill Clinton, broken over two parts, ran for nine minutes and 19 seconds. On September 9 , Stephanopoulos donated four segments and 16 minutes to Obama. That’s 25 minutes to two former Democratic presidents in less than two weeks. A transcript of the September 21 segment can be found below: 7:06 7:06:35 to 7:13:44 7 minutes and 9 seconds (Total: 9 minutes and 19 seconds ) ABC GRAPHIC: Bill Clinton One-on-One: His Mission to Help the World STEPHANOPOULOS: Now, to my exclusive interview with President Clinton. He understands exactly what President Obama is going through right now, after experiencing a midterm mine field of his own in 1994. When I sat down with him, he weighed in with some advice for President Obama and some praise for Sarah Palin. But, we begin with the Clinton Global Initiative. Now in its sixth year, the initiative has raised $60 billion to help more than 200 million people around the world. And I began by asking President Clinton, which new project most excites him? CLINTON: The new commitments I’m most excited about I’d say fall in two categories. I gotta say, first, the fact that these business people still want to invest money in Haiti and help Haiti come back. And this, we have what are called action networks, now that meet on subjects that people really care about all year long. The Haiti Action Network, they’re roaring back with a new set of business commitments. So, I’m very excited about that. The other things I’m excited about relate to ideas that will create jobs here in America and around the world. STEPHANOPOULOS: You may have seen the front page of The New York Times. Heartbreaking letters from the 1.3 million homeless. CLINTON: Yeah. STEPHANOPOULOS: In Haiti. And the letters all boil down to, when is the help going to get there? What are you going to do? Why isn’t it getting through? CLINTON: First, we had a meeting today of this Haiti reconstruction commission. And the United States has got their money through. So, their money will be coming forward. I pointed out to them that we approved $1.6 billion in investment. And $750 million of it is not funded. And that we’re going to be approving a lot more. And we’re going to have a huge housing expo in October, which will enable us to begin massive redevelopment. Moving people out of the camps into the homes. Housing always takes the longest. Secondly, there’s a lag in the aid that’s been promised and the aid that’s been released because of the economic problems in the donor countries. And, so, what I told them today, I said, Look. Just pick one of these things you want to do. And tell us when you’re going to give the money and all the Haitian members who came up from Haiti. And I said, look at them. They know what economic hardship is. They will be okay if you don’t give everything you promised. STEPHANOPOULOS: But, they have to know it’s coming. CLINTON: Just tell them what you’re going to give and when you’re going to give it. And then we can give some hope to the people in the camps and we’ll start building. STEPHANOPOULOS: Let me talk more broadly about the economy. President Obama did a whole town meeting today. And one woman got up and just said, simply, “I’m exhausted of defending you.” A lot of Democrats, a lot of supporters of the President, feel that way. What does he do about it? What does he say? CLINTON: I would say, I know a lot of people are mad. And a lot of people are tired, apathetic. And I respect that because we’re not yet out of the hole we got in. It’s okay to be mad. But make a choice based on what should we do now? And who is more likely to do it? They want to repeal the financial oversight bill, which is designed to keep this disaster from occurring again. I think our choice is better. We have plans to help small business, manufacturing and clean energy. We know they don’t believe in clean energy. And so far, they’re not for my small business plan. I think our choice is better. Do what’s best for you. That’s what I think he should say. STEPHANOPOULOS: You and President Obama get set up as polar opposites. Everybody used to hit you for “Mr. I feel your pain.” And everybody says now, the conventional wisdom, he’s too remote. Too detached. How does he get that gut connection with the American people back? CLINTON: First of all, I think he’s doing the right thing by going out here and explaining things by going out there and explaining things. I think the problem is not that he’s empathetic. I think the fact that he is out here taking this grief. You know, taking the grief of the country on himself. Letting people show they’re anger, show their disappointment. I think that’s a good way to do it. The truth is, that it’s the similarities between us that is getting him in trouble. I knew I had done the right things in ’94. I would like to see him do something I didn’t do. I would like to see him say, “Here’s what this election is about. The only thing that matters is what we do now. Here’s the three things I want to do now. Here’s why I think our side’s more likely to do it. And let me tell you something. We couldn’t get out of the $3 trillion hole in 21 months. Give us two more years. Don’t go back to the policies that dug the hole. But, if we don’t do better,” this is the last thing, “if we don’t do better, you can vote against us all and I’ll be on the ballot, too. Vote against us all if it’s not better.” STEPHANOPOULOS: So, give people permission to vote against you? CLINTON: Absolutely. In other words, I think people feel disempowered. They’re angry because they think they’re doing every, single thing they know to do. And nothing makes it better. STEPHANOPOULOS: There’s a big debate out there about Sarah Palin. I think a lot of Democrats believe she’s the best thing to happen to President Obama in 2012. But, Mark Halperin actually disagreed in Time magazine today. I want to see what you think about this. He wrote, “Most of all, she is much like Bill Clinton. What doesn’t kill Sarah Palin makes her stronger. Palin is very much alive and despite what you think, extraordinarily strong.” Is he right? CLINTON: Well, I do think she’s a resilient character. And we may be entering sort of a period in politics that is sort of fact-free, where experience in government is a negative. I mean, even though I was actually slightly younger than President Obama when I was elected, I was the longest-serving governor in the country. I thought it was important to do these jobs and show results and to be able to acknowledge that you made mistakes and learn from them. So, I don’t think we know what’s going to happen in 2012. But in the Republican primaries, she’s very popular with the conservative base. You know, she’s a compelling, attractive figure. STEPHANOPOULOS: Is she qualified to be president? CLINTON: Well, that’s up- The American people can elect whomever they want. But she served, you know, not a full-time term as governor. And she went out and did this. We don’t even know she’s going to run for president. STEPHANOPOULOS: What’s your gut on that? CLINTON: But, I think she’s clearly a public figure who is- who speaks well and persuasively to the people who listen to her. And she’s somebody to be reckoned with. And she’s tough. Look, I remember when people were making fun of her, I read that her husband broke his arm in the middle of the Idatarod race and finished a 500-mile race with a broken arm. Now, where I come from, people like that. They think that’s pretty good. So, I- My view is, it’s always a mistake to underestimate your opponent. And it’s also virtually always a mistake to attack them personally, as opposed to disagreeing with them on what they want to do. STEPHANOPOULOS: I also asked the President about walking Chelsea up the aisle. He reflected on that. We’ll have that our next hour. ROBIN ROBERTS: He is as passionate as ever. STEPHANOPOULOS: Oh, yeah.   8:01 8:01:19 to 8:03:29 2 minutes and 10 seconds STEPHANOPOULOS: But first, we have a little more of my interview with former President Clinton. Earlier, we were talked about his global initiative, Obama’s midterm funk and also on Sarah Palin. But what really lit him up was his daughter, Chelsea. I was looking at those pictures of you at Chelsea’s wedding. And the look on your face just said it all. I mean, it was the love and pride of a lifetime. And, you know, Chelsea seems to have avoided all of the traps that so many sons and daughters of politicians fall into. How did she do it? CLINTON: She’s a fine person. And I give her mother a lot of credit for it. But from the time she was, you know, a little girl, she knew her father was a governor. And then, she had her- the White House years. And then her mother was a senator. All I can say is that we always thought she was our most important job. And there’s lots of research which shows, even among kids that grow up without their parents, and miserable conditions, and wind up doing well, that the most important thing in a child’s life is that they have to believe in critical years that they’re the most important person in the world to somebody. And then, if you grow up in a famous home or you’re in a rich home, you also need to be reminded that, in all the ways that matter, you’re no different than anybody else. She believes that. So, yeah. I was happy that day. That’s a big passage in your life, you know, when you hand over your child in marriage. And for Hillary and me, it was a very special day. And one I suppose I’ll remember until the day I die. STEPHANOPOULOS: Well, congratulations. Thanks, Mr. President. CLINTON: Thank you. STEPHANOPOULOS: One proud father. Tomorrow, we’ll have a lot more on the Clinton Global Initiative. But, yeah. It’s just- He could have talked about that forever. ROBERTS: It’s evident that he could have. Just looking in his eyes, George, when he was talking about that. STEPHANOPOULOS: Big, big moment for his only daughter. And, tomorrow, as I said, we’re going to talk about the Clinton Global Initiative. They have a great program creating jobs to get small loans to get those businesses up and running. Important stuff in this economy.

More here:
George Stephanopoulos Fawns Over Old Boss Bill Clinton: What New Project Excites You?

Medical marijuana growers join Teamsters union

As organized labor faces declining membership, one of the United States' most storied unions is looking to a new growth industry: marijuana. The Teamsters added nearly 40 new members earlier this month by organizing the country's first group of unionized marijuana growers. Such an arrangement is likely only possible in California, which has the loosest U.S. medical marijuana laws. But it's still unclear how the Teamsters will safeguard the rights of members who do work that's considered a federal crime. http://www.kgw.com/news/business/103285559.html added by: JackHerer

Lady Gaga Speaks Out Against ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ In Maine

‘There are amazing heroes here today whose stories are more powerful than any story I could tell,’ she tells 4,500-person crowd. By James Montgomery Lady Gaga speaks out against ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ in Maine Monday Photo: Matt Harper/ MTV News PORTLAND, Maine — It was probably the smallest stage Lady Gaga has set foot on since her East Village days, but it might have also been the most important. Because Monday (September 20), on that stage — a simple wooden thing with a brick backdrop — in Portland’s Deering Oaks Park, she spoke loudly, proudly and passionately against “don’t ask, don’t tell,” the long-standing policy that prevents openly gay men and women from serving in the Armed Forces and a policy that, on Tuesday, may very well be ancient history if the Senate approves the National Defense Authorization Act. Clearly, the stakes are high, and Gaga, ever the entertainer, was more than up to the task. Speaking before an audience of some 4,500 (mostly students from nearby colleges, activists and a few somewhat confused passersby) on behalf of the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network , she unveiled a speech titled “The Prime Rib of America” that took members of the Senate to task, urged her supporters to action and even managed to tie in rather nicely to the much-discussed “meat dress” she wore to last weekend’s MTV Video Music Awards. “My name is Stefani Joanne Angelina Germanotta. I am an American citizen … [and] to the Senate, to Americans, to Senator Olympia Snowe, Senator Susan Collins — both from Maine — and Senator Scott Brown of Massachusetts: Equality is the prime rib of America,” she said. “Equality is the prime rib of what we stand for as a nation. And I don’t get to enjoy the greatest cut of meat that my country has to offer. Are you listening? Shouldn’t everyone deserve the right to wear the same meat dress that I did? Repeal ‘don’t ask, don’t tell.’ “I’m here today in this park, in Maine, to say that, if the Senate and the president are not going to repeal this ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ policy, perhaps they should be more clear with us about who the military is fighting for, who our tax dollars are supporting and, ultimately, how much does the prime rib cost?” she continued. “Because I thought this was an ‘all you can eat’ buffet. This equality stuff, I thought equality meant everyone. But apparently, for certain value meals, for certain civil rights, I have to pay extra, because I’m gay. … When it’s time to order my meal, when it’s time to benefit from the freedoms of the Constitution that I protect and fight for, I have to pay extra. I shouldn’t have to pay extra. I should have the ability, the opportunity, the right to enjoy the same rights — the same piece of meat — that my fellow soldiers, fellow straight soldiers, already have included in their Meal of Rights. It’s prime rib, it’s the same size, it’s the same grade, the same cost, at wholesale cost, and it’s in the Constitution.” But Gaga’s entire speech wasn’t one long meat analogy. At one point, she drew whoops of support from the crowd by suggesting that several senators — including Arizona Republican John McCain, who plans to lead a filibuster against Tuesday’s vote — were “using homophobia as a defense in their argument” and said that, rather than continue to support “don’t ask, don’t tell,” perhaps those same senators would rather support her proposed piece of legislation. “Doesn’t it seem to be that ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ is backwards? Doesn’t it seem to you that we should send home the prejudiced? The straight soldier who hates the gay soldier? The straight soldier who has prejudice in his heart in the space where the military asks him to hold our core American values?” she asked. “I am here today because I would like to propose a new law; a law that sends home the soldier that has the problem. Our new law is called ‘if you don’t like it, go home.’ If you are not committed to perform with excellence as a United States soldier because you don’t believe in full equality, go home. If you are not honorable enough to fight without prejudice, go home. If you are not capable of keeping your oath to the Armed Forces to defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies foreign and domestic … then go home.” Earlier in the afternoon, members of the SLDN — including discharged servicemen Mike Almy and David Hall, both of whom accompanied Gaga to the VMAs — told the crowd their personal stories of unjust prosecution at the hands of “don’t ask.” Portland Mayor Nick Mavodones, who had worked directly with the organization to bring the event to his city, also expressed his distaste for the policy. But the majority of the crowd was here to see Gaga, and she delivered. There were no flashy costumes (she wore a sportcoat, power tie and glasses) or over-the-top showpieces, just one of the biggest pop stars on the planet speaking out against what she considers to be an unjust law — and, hopefully, helping to get it overturned. “There are amazing heroes here today whose stories are more powerful than any story I could tell, any fight I’ve ever fought, and any song that I could tell,” Gaga said. “I’m here because they inspire me. I’m here because I believe in them. I’m here because ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ is wrong … it’s unjust and, fundamentally, it is against all that we stand for as Americans.” Share your thoughts on Gaga’s rally in the comments below. Related Artists Lady Gaga

Read the rest here:
Lady Gaga Speaks Out Against ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ In Maine

‘Catfish’ Trio Discuss Controversial Documentary’s Aftermath

‘We just wanted to start a conversation with this film,’ filmmaker Henry Joost tells MTV News. By Kara Warner Nev Schulman Photo: MTV News Audiences are still talking about “Catfish,” the 2010 Sundance darling and one of the year’s most heavily hyped documentaries. Now that the film has opened in select theaters across the country, more and more people are joining in on the “Is it real?” debate , as well as looking into the nuts and bolts of how the film came to be. In brief, the documentary revolves around NYC-based photographer Nev Schulman and the series of curious events that occur when he begins an online friendship with a precocious 8-year-old artist from a small town in Michigan and a romantic relationship with her older sister. When MTV News caught up with filmmakers Ariel Schulman and Henry Joost, along with Nev, we asked them — without spoiling anything — how the film’s supporting characters are doing back in Michigan. “Things in Michigan are good,” Joost said. “We still have friends there, and they are becoming involved in the marketing of the film in a cool way, designing posters. We’re pretty excited about that.” Joost also said those friends were part of a small art show tied to the film’s New York premiere. Regarding the strong reactions both audiences and critics have had to the film, Joost said there is a common theme. “I’d say maybe not the most common reaction, but a very common reaction is ‘Wow. Now let me tell you what happened to me; let me tell you what happened to my friend or my cousin or my mom,’ ” he said. “It’s incredible how many stories there are like this out there, and I think the film is kind of an open door to tell those stories now, that are sometimes embarrassing but often lead to good things.” Joost added that their goal in making the film was to just get people talking. “We just wanted to start a conversation with this film and just continue the conversation we’ve been having in the editing room for two years,” he said. What do you think of the buzz surrounding “Catfish”? Did the film make you rethink your approach to social networking or online relationships at all? Let us know in the comments! For breaking news, celebrity columns, humor and more — updated around the clock — visit MTVMoviesBlog.com .

Read more:
‘Catfish’ Trio Discuss Controversial Documentary’s Aftermath

Should We Fear the Year of the Acorn?

Credit: BellaBim Acorns are piling up around the U.S., threatening to cover some cities in nuts. Not really, but there have been an “exceptionally large number of acorns ” dropped by oak trees around the country this year, Chicago-area experts say. … Read the full story on TreeHugger

Originally posted here:
Should We Fear the Year of the Acorn?