Tag Archives: country

Amanpour Paints Rauf’s Protection Racket as ‘a Matter of Vital National Security’

Iman Feisal Abdul Rauf chose ABC’s Christiane Amanpour to spend “several hours” with on Thursday in New York City, and just as she did back on the August 22 This Week when she featured Rauf’s wife and an ally, she again served as his public relations agent, forwarding his claims without challenge. After passing along his denial of any deal to move his project, Amanpour gushingly relayed meaningless blather about his great concern: “The imam went on to tell me that this whole issue is so sensitive because he has to really take care of sensitivities here in the United States and abroad.” Amanpour proceeded to tout that he’s now back from an overseas trip “all about interfaith dialogue and trying to reach the moderates,” and he warned, as he did on Wednesday’s Larry King Live, that if he doesn’t get his way Muslims will murder Americans. Amanpour, however, didn’t describe that as a protection racket or suggest he’s employing blackmail. Instead, she just paraphrased his spin that his warning — about his vanity – is “a matter of vital national security” to the U.S.: He says that this has become a huge international issue, the issue over the Islamic center in Manhattan and also the threatened Koran burning. And so everybody, all over the world, not just here in the United States, is watching. And he felt, and he said to me, that he thought it was a matter of vital national security not to give in or to move that Islamic center. She then played a soundbite from Rauf: My major concern with moving it is that the headline in the Muslim world will be, “Islam is under attack in America.” This will strengthen the radicals in the Muslim world, help their recruitment. This will put our people, our soldiers, our troops, our embassies, our citizens, under attack in the Muslim world. And we have expanded and given and fueled terrorism. Despite what he said, Amanpour assured viewers: “So, he said he wasn’t making any threats or predicting any terrible worst case scenario.” To say nothing of how this awful scenario was set in motion by his quest to put a mosque so near Ground Zero and refusal to address the sensitivities of 9/11 victims. Nonetheless, Amanpour agreeably related his rejection of any comparison to burning Korans when he’s just trying to build a wonderful “multi-faith monument” to “tolerance,” as she described how he called it “extraordinary to try to equate destroying anybody’s scripture with building what he called his center to be a multi-faith monument for cultural and ethnic tolerance and for all religions and groups to come and try to share the moderate ground of the current space.” My August 22 NB posting, “ Amanpour on One-Sided This Week: ‘Profound Questions About Religious Tolerance and Prejudice in the U.S .’” recounted: Not even feigning the pretense of balance, a week after her roundtable hailed President Obama’s initial endorsement of the Ground Zero mosque (GZM), on this Sunday’s This Week host Christiane Amanpour featured an “exclusive” with two GZM proponents as she declared “the controversy has raised profound questions about religious tolerance and prejudice in the United States. And the backlash against Islam has been seen across the country…” Holding up the current Time magazine with its “Is America Islamophobic?” cover, she forwarded the contention: “Is America Islamophobic? Are you concerned about the long-term relationship between American Muslims and the rest of society here?” Amanpour’s guests, to “cut through the heated rhetoric” on the only Sunday interview show with a guest segment on the GZM (Fox News Sunday took it up in its panel time): Daisy Khan, wife of imam behind the project, and Rabbi Joy Levitt, from the Jewish Community Center in Manhattan, “who’s an adviser on the project.”… From the Thursday, September 9 ABC World News: DIANE SAWYER: Tell us more about your interview with that imam today. CHRISTIANE AMANPOUR: Well, yes indeed Diane, he’s just come back, as you know, from a rather lengthy overseas trip, sponsored by the State Department, all about interfaith dialogue and trying to reach the moderates. And he says that this has become a huge international issue, the issue over the Islamic center in Manhattan and also the threatened Koran burning. And so everybody, all over the world, not just here in the United States, is watching. And he felt, and he said to me, that he thought it was a matter of vital national security not to give in or to move that Islamic center. This is what he said. IMAN FEISAL ABDUL RAUF, AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR MUSLIM ADVANCEMENT: My major concern with moving it is that the headline in the Muslim world will be, “Islam is under attack in America.” This will strengthen the radicals in the Muslim world, help their recruitment. This will put our people, our soldiers, our troops, our embassies, our citizens, under attack in the Muslim world. And we have expanded and given and fueled terrorism. AMANPOUR: So, he said he wasn’t making any threats or predicting any terrible worst case scenario, just that he said that this was an extremely important consideration in these talks about anybody potentially moving that Islamic center. Diane? SAWYER: And what else did he say about the equation of the Koran burning and the mosque near ground zero? AMANPOUR:  Well, he said it was really — he said, extraordinary, to try to equate destroying anybody’s scripture with building what he called his center to be a multi-faith monument for cultural and ethnic tolerance and for all religions and groups to come and try to share the moderate ground of the current space. And he said there was no way to draw any kind of equivalence.

More:
Amanpour Paints Rauf’s Protection Racket as ‘a Matter of Vital National Security’

CNN’s Larry King Replacement Praises Obama For Improving America’s Image Abroad

In a Thursday interview with CBS Early Show special contributor Amanda Holden, Larry King replacement Piers Morgan talked about his new CNN show and who would be at the top of his guest list: “Well, I’d love to do President Obama. I like what he’s done for the reputation of America abroad, which I’m not sure many Americans fully understand.” The second on Morgan’s list: “Bill Clinton, another one….One of the most charismatic people I’ve ever seen.” At the mention of Clinton, Holden gushed: “Oh, yes. I’d love you to interview him.” Holden concluded her report by proclaiming: “[Piers] is a complete news junky and he tells me that he cannot wait for the next big story to break….he knew he wanted to be a reporter since he was 6 years old. Aww. Replacing Larry King is really a dream come true for him.” While teasing Holden’s exclusive interview with Morgan earlier in the broadcast, co-host Harry Smith gave the British talker a ringing endorsement: “…the big headline, Piers Morgan gets Larry King’s job….He’s got an amazing, interesting newspaper background and he may actually have the right feet to fill those shoes.” Here is a full transcript of Holden’s September 9 interview with Morgan: 7:01AM ET TEASE: HARRY SMITH: Also this morning, the big headline, Piers Morgan gets Larry King’s job. People have seen him on a talent show, whatever it is, but people across America say, ‘who is this guy?’ Our Amanda Holden, our good pal, they’re very good friends. We have an exclusive with Amanda and Piers and she’s going to tell us all about the guy. He’s got an amazing, interesting newspaper background and he may actually have the right feet to fill those shoes. ERICA HILL: Oh, looking forward to that. 7:17AM ET TEASE: SMITH: Also, we’re going to hear from Piers Morgan, exclusively, about his new gig replacing Larry King on CNN. 7:30AM ET TEASE: SMITH: Coming up, an exclusive look at the man trying to fill some big suspenders. Piers Morgan is taking over for Larry King on CNN starting in January. He’s a much bigger name in Britain than he is here. And our friend, Amanda Holden, who’s a pretty big name herself over there, had a talk with Piers about his plans for his new role.                                      7:37AM ET TEASE: SMITH: Up next, the new Larry King, minus the suspenders. Our Amanda Holden has an Early Show exclusive interview with Piers Morgan. He’ll be taking over that time slot at CNN. 7:40AM ET SEGMENT: HARRY SMITH: CNN has officially announced that Piers Morgan from ‘America’s Got Talent’ will replace Larry King when he leaves his long-running prime time program in January. Early Show special contributor Amanda Holden recently visited with Piers Morgan. She joins us now from London with an Early Show exclusive. Amanda, good morning. AMANDA HOLDEN: Good morning, Harry. Well, some of you know me as one of the judges on ‘Britain’s Got Talent.’ Truth be told, I sit right between Piers Morgan and Simon Cowell, quite an extraordinary place to be, let me tell you. On American television, Piers is seen weekly as a talent judge, but in England he’s also known as a veteran journalist who’s covered news all over the world. I sat down with Piers for a personal conversation and he told me how he approached CNN and then campaigned to replace the king of talk. LARRY KING: Welcome to CNN, Piers. PIERS MORGAN: Thank you very much. It’s a great honor- HOLDEN: With that hand shake Larry King ended an era and handed over the reins of his 25-year-old show to British journalist Piers Morgan. KING: With that chapter closing I’m looking forward to the future. What my next chapter will bring. But for now, for here, it’s time to hang up the nightly suspenders. HOLDEN: It was a storied career that included some 40,000 interviews, King’s been the man everyone’s opened up to. KING: Who gave you this ring? ELIZABETH TAYLOR: Richard. HOLDEN: A frenzy of speculation erupted as to who would replace the industry legend. Familiar names like Ryan Seacrest, Joy Behar, and Howard Stern were mentioned. The name that quickly emerged as the frontrunner was actually the British journalist. MORGAN: If I’m as memorable in 40 years’ time as he’s become, I’ll be absolutely thrilled. HOLDEN: Now in one of his very first interviews since the news became public, Morgan says the enormity of the job is still sinking in. MORGAN: I’ll admit, he’s one of my heroes. And what I loved about the show, always, is that he could do a president one minute and Paris Hilton the next and be equally comfortable. [CLIP FROM ‘AMERICA’S GOT TALENT’] MORGAN: And I decided there were too many missed notes. HOLDEN: Many recognize Piers in this country as a talent show and from the show that discovered Susan Boyle, ‘Britain’s Got Talent.’ He also happens to be one of the most respected interviewers in the U.K. On his show, ‘Piers Morgan’s Life Stories,’ he’s faced off with prime ministers. MORGAN: Well let me spell it out for you, there are a lot of narcotics swashing around in university. GORDON BROWN: No, I’ve never touched cannabis, never touched any hard drugs. MORGAN: Never inhaled, exhaled. HOLDEN: My husband always says that you – you pump the cushions up nicely – plump them up – and then you whack them. MORGAN: I don’t think I whack people, but I do, I think probably what I’m known for in Britain most is asking very direct questions. MORGAN: How vain are you? SIMON COWELL: Not that vain, actually. I’m actually not. MORGAN: How have you kept a straight face saying that? Actually, I know how you kept a straight face. From the Botox. HOLDEN: Piers’ unique style has made him an insider on both sides of the Atlantic, from Hollywood’s elite to Britain’s royals. MORGAN: I had a lunch with Diana and Prince William when he was 13. She looked absolutely beautiful in the flesh. I remember thinking the most beautiful woman I’ve ever seen in my life. HOLDEN: Now obviously, American audiences have absolutely no idea, really, of your journalistic background. And you have feasted on celebrities in our country. MORGAN: Well, I find the celebrity culture fascinating, but I also find a lot of them to be overpaid, underworked, pampered little prima donnas. So when I find whining celebrities, it really gets on my nerves. HOLDEN: With his new CNN show starting in January, it’s not too soon for Piers to be thinking about who he’d like to talk to. MORGAN: Well, I’d love to do President Obama. I like what he’s done for the reputation of America abroad, which I’m not sure many Americans fully understand. Bill Clinton, another one. HOLDEN: Oh, yes. I’d love you to interview him. MORGAN: One of the most charismatic people I’ve ever seen. I’d also love to get Mel Gibson, what a story he’s got to tell. HOLDEN: Yeah. No matter who he’s sitting across from, Piers is determined to make his mark on TV. MORGAN: I want to become the person that, you know, big stars in America, big public figures, feel they can go to for an entertaining encounter, but they’ll be thinking that wasn’t an easy ride. That’s the perfect interview environment. HOLDEN: Piers’ now show doesn’t have a name yet, but it will be based in New York. He’ll also shuttle between Los Angeles and London. He’s a complete news junky and he tells me that he cannot wait for the next big story to break. His grandfather was journalist, as was his father for a while, and he said that he knew he wanted to be a reporter since he was 6 years old. Aww. Replacing Larry King is really a dream come true for him. SMITH: Talk to me a little bit more about his background, because we really only know him from the reality show here in the United States and a little from the one in the U.K.. He really does have a kind of a wide knowledge of all kinds of celebrities. HOLDEN: I mean, he has dozens and dozens of celebrities he’s interviewed. And many of them now have become his friends. I can tell you one story that I can share that he – Piers told me that he was actually the person that introduced Paul McCartney to Heather Mills and encouraged him to go out with her. And we all know how that ended. And apparently, Sir Paul McCartney later said, ‘thanks, mate, that cost me 50 million.’ SMITH: Just 50 million. HOLDEN: Oh, and another bit of juicy gossip was that Piers told me that Sarah Ferguson begged him for an introduction to Tiger Woods just – well, not near the scandal, but a few years before the scandal broke. But he didn’t. And I think she had a lucky escape because she might have been on that list of conquests. SMITH: Wow, there you go. Amanda, thank you so much. Love the insight. HOLDEN: Thank you. SMITH: We’re all voting yes for the new do, by the way. HOLDEN: Oh, bless you. Thank you. SMITH: Alright, have a good day. HOLDEN: Loving yours as always, Harry. SMITH: Amanda, thank you so much.

See the article here:
CNN’s Larry King Replacement Praises Obama For Improving America’s Image Abroad

Federal Agents Raid At Least Five Las Vegas Medical Marijuana Dispensaries

The federal Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) conducted raids earlier today on at least five medical marijuana dispensaries in Las Vegas, Nevada, and reportedly seized patient and financial records, but made no arrests. According to the Associated Press, Natalie Collins, spokeswoman for the local U.S. Attorney's office said that the federal search warrants and “supporting affidavits stemming from what she called 'an ongoing law enforcement operation' were sealed by federal court order.” The dispensaries raided today by federal agents and local police included: Happiness Consultant, Salvation Haven, Nature's Way, Organic Releaf, & Holistic Solutions. The federal raids come nearly a year after an October 2009 Justice Department directive issued to U.S. Attorneys in medical marijuana states, deprioritizing enforcement against medical marijuana patients and providers. The Las Vegas raids occurred less than two months after another spate of federal raids in July against state-compliant patients in California and Michigan. “The federal government should never be called on to enforce local or state medical marijuana laws,” said Caren Woodson, Director of Government Affairs with Americans for Safe Access (ASA), the country's largest medical marijuana advocacy group. “The federal DEA must abide by the Justice Department policy and stay out of the enforcement of local and state medical marijuana laws.” http://stopthedrugwar.org/trenches/2010/sep/08/federal_agents_raid_least_five_l added by: JackHerer

YG Says Ladies Can ‘Toot It And Boot It’ Too

L.A. rapper looks to capitalize on debut single’s success, in Mixtape Daily. By Steven Roberts YG Photo: MTV News Fire Starter: YG If you’ve set foot in L.A. over the last few months, you’ve definitely heard YG’s “Toot It and Boot It.” The laid-back, infectious tune is a staple of any SoCal party, and it’s starting to gain traction throughout the rest of the country. So the next question on everyone’s minds has to be: What does the phrase “toot it and boot it” mean? “The song ‘Toot It and Boot It’ means have fun for one night,” YG explained. “Go to Vegas, you meet a girl in the club, tell her what’s up, take her back to the hotel, and then you do you-know-what, then after you do that, you kick them out. You got to go. You toot it and boot it. You got to give them the boot, and then it’s on with your life.” The song is a new take on the old notion of a one-night stand. YG said the track came together after producer and vocalist Ty$ and a few of his homies invited him to the studio to jump on a track they were working on. And despite the song’s seemingly misogynistic overtones, YG insisted “tooting and booting” is an equal-opportunity sport. “The girls like that song, because they do a lot of tootin’ it and bootin’ it too, so they feel where I’m coming from,” he said. The rapper hails from L.A. and is signed to Def Jam, a label not traditionally known for signing too many West Coast acts. YG had amassed an impressive following in L.A., thanks to the promotional team he co-created “Pu$haz Ink.” He caught Def Jam’s attention by pushing his high-energy party music at shows and clubs. YG’s debut album, Fresh on Campus, will definitely have his traditional party vibe. His previous producers handled a majority of the album, and his next single, the suggestive “Patty Cake,” is in line with what fans expect from him. “I wanted to come out with ‘Patty Cake,’ because ‘Toot It and Boot It’ is a laid-back song,” he said. “I feel all my fans know me as the party dude, like, ‘He turnt-up,’ so I feel like I’ve got to come out with something next that’s turnt-up.” YG’s third single, “Hell Yeah,” will have a bit more star power with a potential feature from “Deuces” duo Chris Brown and Tyga. He knew Brown’s best friend, Miho, from L.A., and he connected the two artists. Brown was more than happy to jump on the song when YG sent it to him. He was debating adding Tyga, joking that he selfishly may want to be the only one rapping. Besides his debut release, which is slated for early 2011, YG recently filmed the movie “We the Party,” directed by Mario Van Peebles, and he said he’s been asked about starring in the Tupac Shakur biopic . YG said he enjoyed his first acting experience and said he might stick with it. “I really liked it, you feel me?” YG said. “I hear that’s where the money at, so I’m finnin’ to go get the money.” For other artists featured in Mixtape Daily, check out Mixtape Daily Headlines .

Read the original here:
YG Says Ladies Can ‘Toot It And Boot It’ Too

Ed Schultz to Speak at Hastily Arranged DC Rally He Claims Not in Response to Glenn Beck’s Rally

Remember the Seinfeld episode where George Costanza pretended to be an architect? Seinfeld thought it was a bad idea, suggesting Constanza would do better as a fake marine biologist, leading Constanza to complain, “You know I’ve always wanted to pretend that I was an architect.” Ed Schultz, liberal radio host and MSNBC flamethrower, is done pretending to be an architect. Schultz garnered plenty of attention last week with his huff-and-puff claim he could outdraw the estimated 300,000 people who attended Glenn Beck’s Restoring Honor rally in Washington on Aug. 28. What made Schultz’s boast so insipid was his insistence that he not actually organize or take part in a rally to exceed Beck’s draw, if only in spirit. Schultz’s suggestion alone would suffice. No need to actually draft a blueprint or break a sweat. Perhaps the Labor Day weekend knocked some reality into Schultz. According to Brian Maloney at The Radio Equalizer , Schultz has decided to appear at the “One Nation Working Together” rally on the mall in Washington on Oct. 2, exactly one month before the midterms. Here’s Schultz talking about this on his radio show yesterday (audio available at Radio Equalizer) — The march is on, Oct. 2. Will you march with me?  And thousands upon thousands. Oh, we’ll get three hundred grand. We’ll get 300,000, absolutely. We’ll show you conservatives out there when big Eddie starts cranking on something we don’t back down until it gets done. It’s happening on Oct. 2. I appreciate all of you going to our website at wegoted.com, there’s a consortium of groups that are coming together. You see, the Republicans, they want you to quit. They want you to think that there’s a tsunami coming. What tsunami? Ain’t no tsunamis coming! Nothing’s lost until you give up! If you give up, then they have a chance. I don’t buy the polls, I don’t believe it, I believe America is smarter than this, and I think Americans don’t want to go back. … Many of you are out of work. Many of you can’t make it to the rally but a lot of you will. We have been inundated with all kinds of communication from wonderful listeners and viewers and I will be a featured speaker. There will be other speakers and there will be some groups that are going to be obviously helping out with all of this, just like FreedomWorks and the billionaires and the six months of promotion helped out the Beckster. And I want to get something very clear right now. If Beck had not done his rally, this would have happened, OK? This is about the country. This is about making sure that information is where it has to be, with the American people. And now it’s about passion, now it’s about emotion. And by the way, there will be some old and there will be some white people at the Oct. 2 rally on the mall in Washington, D.C. They just won’t be angry. And they won’t be motivated by hate and they won’t be race-baited. Schultz asserts that “if Beck had not done his rally, this would have happened” anyway. Maybe so, and I’ll temporarily set aside my well-deserved skepticism of anything claimed by Schultz. But the whiff of desperation wafting from Schultz’s reversal makes me wonder if Beck hasn’t put the fear of God in him.

Originally posted here:
Ed Schultz to Speak at Hastily Arranged DC Rally He Claims Not in Response to Glenn Beck’s Rally

Hometown Heartbreak for NY Times: Mosque Opposition Spreads to Sophisticated New York City

Well fancy that: The New York Times has learned what Times Watch has been pointing out for weeks: Not even New Yorkers want a large mosque built two blocks from the site of the 9-11 terrorist attacks. New York City residents were previously praised by Times reporters like Sheryl Gay Stolberg as better informed and thus more tolerant of the idea of a mosque at Ground Zero than ignorant outsiders. But a New York Times poll conducted last week showed that New Yorkers don’t like the idea of building a mosque near the site of the 9-11 terrorist attacks anymore than the rest of the country. In fact, New York City residents (that includes Manhattan and the outer boroughs) oppose it by a 50 margin. Yes, the nationwide opposition to the construction, twice declaimed as a ” nativist impulse ” by the paper’s main political writer Matt Bai, has infected even the tolerant, sophisticated liberals of Manhattan. Building its story around the poll, reporters Michael Barbaro and Marjorie Connelly reported on last Friday’s front page: ” New Yorkers Divided Over Islamic Center, Poll Finds .” (Actually New Yorkers are more than merely divided but are mostly opposed to the mosque being built near Ground Zero.) Two-thirds of New York City residents want a planned Muslim community center and mosque to be relocated to a less controversial site farther away from ground zero in Lower Manhattan, including many who describe themselves as supporters of the project, according to a New York Times poll. The poll indicates that support for the 13-story complex, which organizers said would promote moderate Islam and interfaith dialogue, is tepid in its hometown. …. Over all, 50 percent of those surveyed oppose building the project two blocks north of the World Trade Center site, even though a majority believe that the developers have the right to do so. Thirty-five percent favor it. Opposition is more intense in the boroughs outside Manhattan — for example, 54 percent in the Bronx — but it is even strong in Manhattan, considered a bastion of religious tolerance, where 41 percent are against it. The poll was conducted Aug. 27 to 31 with 892 adults. The margin of sampling error is plus or minus three percentage points. It suggested that Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg, the center’s most ardent and public defender, has not unified public opinion around the issue. Asked if they approved or disapproved of how he had handled the subject, city residents were evenly split. Indeed, Times reporters took to Twitter to gush over NYC Mayor Bloomberg’s weepy speech in defense of building the mosque near the site of terrorist attacks committed in the name of Islam. The Times worked in its standard jab against Newt and Palin as outsiders (albeit outsiders who are on the side of the majority of New Yorkers on this issue): While a majority said politicians in New York should take a stand on the issue, most disapprove of those outside the city weighing in: Newt Gingrich and Sarah Palin, among others, have tried to rally opposition to the center. The article was accompanied on the editorial page by a righteously concerned editorial, ” Mistrust and the Mosque ,” moaning over how New Yorkers have failed to teach a moral lesson to the ignorant masses. The furor over the proposed Islamic cultural center and mosque near ground zero keeps giving us new reasons for dismay. As politicians and commentators work themselves and viewers into a rage, others who should be standing up for freedom and tolerance tiptoe away. To the growing pile of discouragement, add this: A New York Times poll of New York City residents that found that even this city, the country’s most diverse and cosmopolitan , is not immune to suspicion and to a sadly wary misunderstanding of Muslim-Americans. …. Tolerance, however, isn’t the same as understanding, so it is appalling to see New Yorkers who could lead us all away from mosque madness, who should know better, playing to people’s worst instincts.

See the original post:
Hometown Heartbreak for NY Times: Mosque Opposition Spreads to Sophisticated New York City

Left Wing Nation Magazine: Schoolteachers ‘Exclude Progressive Ideas and Viewpoints’

The folks at the far-left Nation Magazine have finally figured out the problem that continues to plague the American education system: it’s dominated by right-wingers! Seriously. That’s what they think. Or at least what they’re claiming. A spokesman for the Nation whined to the Daily Caller’s Chris Moody about a supposed “tendency for classes to exclude progressive ideas and viewpoints.” Most people who have ever set foot in a classroom are now scratching their heads in confusion. Moody reported: “The real idea behind it is to bring the left perspective to issues to make sure students have both left and right available to them,” the Nation’s Vice President of Circulation Art Stupar told TheDC. “This is an opportunity for students to view what the progressive left thinks about a particular issue.” The liberal magazine sends online curriculum guides each week to teachers that include experts from the magazine, talking points about current events and suggested discussion topics for the classroom. The guides are a part of the magazine’s “learning packs,” which offer educators access to its archives dating back to shortly after the Civil War. “In this year of economic uncertainty and critical mid-term elections, the corporate-owned media will not be offering lessons about: our rigged political system; the conservative crusade against Muslims; the phony ‘panic’ over debt; vets abandoned by the VA; taxes and the Tea Party and much, much more,” read the magazine’s announcement for the new school year, which begins today for many students around the country. Let’s see. College professors give money to Democrats over Republicans by a greater than 7-1 margin . Ninety-six percent of teachers’ unions political contributions since 1990 have gone to Democrats. And this is the industry the Nation claims is suffering from a tragic deficit of leftist thought. Of course those numbers are not surprising to anyone who is, you know, paying attention. And those willing to acknowledge reality will not need to look at the NEA’s balance sheet to recognize the sheer absurdity of the premises underlying the Nation’s campaign. National Review publisher Jack Fowler, who called the Nation’s effort “laughable,” clearly has a firm grasp on reality. “We have no outreach to the three conservative professors that there are,” he told the DC.

Read more from the original source:
Left Wing Nation Magazine: Schoolteachers ‘Exclude Progressive Ideas and Viewpoints’

CNN’s Chetry to Koran Burning Pastor: You’ll Have Blood on Your Hands

On Tuesday’s American Morning, CNN’s Kiran Chetry used General David Petraeus’s denunciation of a planned Koran burning by a church to blast the church’s pastor for any subsequent deaths of U.S. soldiers in Afghanistan: ” Are you willing to have the blood of soldiers on your hands by this demonstration? ” Chetry also lectured Pastor Terry Jones over his apparent lack of “refined” Christianity. Chetry interviewed Pastor Jones 41 minutes into the 7 am Eastern hour. After asking him why he and his church were planning to burn Korans, the anchor launched into her critique of the minister: “I wanted to let you say your piece, because when I first read this story, I thought there’s no way that this could be as bad as it sounds. It appears that it is . You’re saying that you’re going to burn the holy book of another religion to send a message to the radical elements of that religion, with no thought to the fact that you’d obviously be highly offending everyone in that religion. How do you justify that?” Later in the segment, Chetry turned theologian and quoted Scripture to Pastor Jones as she continued to question his planned action: ” What about turn thy cheek? I mean, this is- you know, Christianity at its most- you know, refined. It’s that you just don’t act out in violence. You don’t act out in any manner of hate, that you turn thy cheek, that you don’t rise to the nastiness or the level of payback that your perceived enemies do. I mean, isn’t this the exact opposite of what Christ taught all of us to be and to do? ” The CNN anchor’s “blood on your hands” remark came moments later: CHETRY: I just want to ask you this: does it bother you that the military and the military leaders believe that by doing this, you are very likely putting the risk- the lives of U.S. soldiers at risk in Muslim countries? David Petraeus, the general- this is what he said: ‘Their actions will in fact jeopardize the safety of young men and women who are serving in uniform over here, and also undermine the very mission that they’re trying to accomplish.’ Are you willing to have the blood of soldiers on your hands by this demonstration? As she wrapped up the interview, Chetry again questioned Pastor Jones’s Christianity. After the minister emphasized that Islamists “must be shown a certain amount of force, a certain amount of determination,” the anchor replied, ” That doesn’t sound like the Christianity most of us were taught .” Earlier in the segment, Chetry stated how “freedom of religion is…one aspect of what makes our country so great and different from many countries around the world,” in the context of Muslims’ right to worship and build mosques, such as the Ground Zero mosque, but didn’t once raise how Pastor Jones and his church have the First Amendment right to burn Korans. This isn’t surprising, given how CNN has been using their coverage to press how “Islamophobia” is apparently sweeping the nation. The full transcript of Kiran Chetry’s interview of Pastor Terry Jones on Tuesday’s American Morning: CHETRY: This morning, the top U.S. commander in Afghanistan says that a Florida church’s plan to burn the Koran on 9/11 could put the U.S. mission there and our troops at risk. Hundreds of Muslims in Afghanistan are protesting the decision, chanting, ‘Long Live Islam;’ ‘Death to America,’ we saw. That’s the latest video of the Kabul protests. There’s been others in Indonesia, as well as other places. Joining us now from the Dove Outreach World Center in Gainesville, Florida, is Terry Jones, a reverend of the church, senior pastor and the man behind the event. Thanks for joining us this morning to talk more about this, Terry. One of the things I’m wondering is- PASTOR TERRY JONES: Thank you. CHETRY: This rally is set to take place Saturday- of course, that’s September 11th. It’s also the last day of the Ramadan fast, the holiest day known as Eid in the Muslim religion. Why are you going to burn Korans? JONES: Yeah, we first declared September 11th, ‘International Burn a Koran Day’- actually, for two reasons. Number one, we wanted to remember those who were brutally murdered on September 11th. And actually, we wanted to send a very clear message to the radical element of Islam. We wanted to send a very clear message to them that we are not interested in their Sharia law. We do not tolerate their threats, their fear, their radicalness. We live in the United States of America. We want to send a clear message to the peaceful Muslims. We have freedom of speech. We have freedom of religion. They are more than welcome to be here- more than welcome to worship- more than welcome to build mosques. But our 9/11 demonstration- our 9/11 protest is to send a clear message to the radical element of Islam that we will not tolerate that in America. CHETRY: Well, I wanted to let you say your piece, because when I first read this story, I thought there’s no way that this could be as bad as it sounds. It appears that it is. You’re saying that you’re going to burn the holy book of another religion to send a message to the radical elements of that religion, with no thought to the fact that you’d obviously be highly offending everyone in that religion. How do you justify that? JONES: Well, we realized that this action would indeed offend people- offend the Muslims. I am offended when they burn the flag. I am offended when they burn the Bible. But we feel that the message that we are trying to send is much more important than people being offended. We believe that we cannot back off of the truth of the dangers of Islam- of the dangers of radical Islam just because people are going to be offended. Overseas, we see they have no problem burning our flag. They have no problem calling for the death of America- the death of our president- CHETRY: Right, but this isn’t overseas, this is America. I mean, part of- JONES: So we feel it’s time to stand up. CHETRY: But this isn’t overseas, I mean, this is America, and you just said that you welcome peaceful Muslims and you welcome people who build Korans [sic]. I mean- you know, freedom of religion is what- is one aspect of what makes our country so great and different from many countries around the world. So why would you want to play into that? JONES: We’re not playing into it at all. I just made a very clear statement. Muslims are welcome here. They are welcome to worship, as long as they submit to- obey the Constitution of the United States- do not, sooner or later, try to institute Sharia law in America. Our message is very clear- it is not to the moderate Muslim. Our message is not a message of hate. Our message is a message of warning to the radical element of Islam, and I think what we see right now, around the globe, proves exactly what we’re talking about. CHETRY: What about turn thy cheek? I mean, this is- you know, Christianity at its most- you know, refined. It’s that you just don’t act out in violence. You don’t act out in any manner of hate, that you turn thy cheek, that you don’t rise to the nastiness or the level of payback that your perceived enemies do. I mean, isn’t this the exact opposite of what Christ taught all of us to be and to do? JONES: I agree with you exactly. I think, most of the time, we as Christians are indeed called to turn the other cheek. I believe that, most of the time, talk and diplomacy is the correct way. But I also think that once in a while- I think you see that in the Bible- there are incidents where enough is enough and you stand up. Jesus went into the temple and he threw all of the money-changers out. He did not ask them to leave. He was not peaceful. He was at that time very, very upset. Even when this very close friend and disciple, Peter- even when he tried to stop Jesus from fulfilling his will- from fulfilling the father’s will, Jesus called him the devil. Jesus called the religious leaders of that time serpents and snakes. So I agree that, most of the time, diplomacy and turning the other cheek is the proper way, but sometimes not. CHETRY: Are you- you don’t care- I mean, yes or no- you don’t really care if you’re offending Muslims by burning the Koran, right? That doesn’t bother you if they’re offended? JONES: We realize that we are definitely offending them, yes. CHETRY: Okay. So I want to ask you this: does it bother you though- JONES: But we actually think that Muslims should- CHETRY: I just want to ask you this: does it bother you that the military and the military leaders believe that by doing this, you are very likely putting the risk- the lives of U.S. soldiers at risk in Muslim countries? David Petraeus, the general- this is what he said: ‘Their actions will in fact jeopardize the safety of young men and women who are serving in uniform over here, and also undermine the very mission that they’re trying to accomplish.’ Are you willing to have the blood of soldiers on your hands by this demonstration? JONES: Yeah, we are actually very, very concerned, of course, and we are taking the general’s words very serious. We are continuing to pray about the action on September 11th. We are indeed very concerned about it. It’s just that we don’t know- I mean, how long do we back down? When do we stop backing down? CHETRY: So you’re saying that you very might- you’re saying that you might well go through with this? You’re saying that you’re praying about it, you may not burn the Koran on September 11th? JONES: I’m saying that we are definitely praying about it. We have firmly made up our mind, but at the same time, we are definitely praying about it. But like I said, I mean, how long- I mean, when does America stand for truth? I mean, instead of us being blamed for what other people will do or might do, why don’t we send a warning to them? Why don’t we send a warning to radical Islam and say- look, don’t do it. CHETRY: Well, I’m not questioning- JONES: If you attack us- if you attack us, we will attack you. CHETRY: I am not questioning your intelligence, but I am wondering if you thought through the consequences of doing this, of what may happen, and whether or not you’ll end up doing far more harm than good? JONES: We are definitely doing that. We are definitely weighing the situation. We are weighing the thing that we’re about to do, what it possibly could cause, what is our actual message, what are we trying to get across, how important is that to us right now- that is very, very important that America wakes up. It’s very important that our president wakes up. It’s very important that we see the real danger of radical Islam. That’s what we’re talking about. Actually, everyone should be in agreement with us. CHETRY: All right. We have to go. JONES: There should be no disagreement there. We are not against Muslims. We’re not against the mosque. We’re against the radical element of Islam. Even moderate Muslims should be on our side. CHETRY: No moderate Muslim is going to be on your side when you’re burning their holy book. I mean, that just sounds silly. JONES: Of course, it’s not silly. You can separate yourself from that- CHETRY: You’re burning their holy book. They’re supposed to be on their side. I don’t get that part. Listen- JONES: You can say- we are not for the burning of the book, but we are for what this man is saying. What he is doing, we’re not for that. We don’t believe in burning our holy book, we don’t believe in burning the Koran- CHETRY: Just reasoning this through, don’t you think you could possibly reach out to more people by not burning the Koran on September 11th? JONES: But what he is saying- we are actually for that. We are against radical Islam. Excuse me? CHETRY: I said, don’t you think you could possibly do more good about bringing attention to your concerns about radical Islam by not burning the Koran on September 11th, by saying, you know what? We’re going to take the higher road here- we’re not going to do this? JONES: At this time, no. CHETRY: All right. JONES: I believe that we are dealing with an element that you cannot talk to. We are dealing with an element- they must be shown a certain amount of force, a certain amount of determination, and putting a stop to it. CHETRY: That doesn’t sound like the Christianity most of us were taught, but, you know what? I thank you for your time and your perspective this morning. Dr. Terry Jones, thanks for being with us. JONES: Thank you.

See the rest here:
CNN’s Chetry to Koran Burning Pastor: You’ll Have Blood on Your Hands

‘Waiting For Superman’ Director Hopes Film Will Help U.S. Schools

‘We’re failing too many kids,’ Davis Guggenheim tells MTV News. By Kara Warner “Waiting for Superman” Photo: Paramount Pictures “Waiting For Superman,” like “Catfish,” is a documentary that came out of this year’s Sundance Film Festival with major buzz. But the two films couldn’t be more different. Directed by Davis Guggenheim (“An Inconvenient Truth”), “Superman” sheds a glaring and startling light on the crippling flaws of America’s school system. MTV caught up with the award-winning director while he was in the midst of a promotional blitz that has included appearances and screenings at schools across the country — one of which MTV was proud to host in conjunction with our Get Schooled campaign . Despite a hectic schedule (which explains why he didn’t have the time to do that Justin Bieber concert movie ), Guggenheim sat down with us to talk education reform, the reasons why MTV viewers should care about their neighborhood schools and what the average person can do to sustain the conversation he hopes to start with his film. MTV : Why tackle this subject now? Davis Guggenheim : Well, I’m a parent and I have three kids. I worry about what education they’re going to get. … Everyone knows the world has changed, but our schools haven’t changed. They’re not built to prepare our kids for this new economy. Right now, if you don’t graduate high school and don’t go to a four-year college, your chances are really limited. We’re failing too many kids. Kids who watch MTV should be really worried about whether they’re getting the right education and whether their friends and siblings are getting a good education, so they can have a good life and a piece of the American dream. MTV : With a film like this, people feel outrage, depression, etc. What is the message or emotion you want people to take away from it? Davis Guggenheim : There are two feelings when you see this movie. The movie climaxes in a scene where the kids I follow end up at a lottery and you realize that their future is going to be determined by how a bingo ball bounces, literally. They are there holding a card with a number, but instead of winning a lot of money, you win a chance to have a future in America, and it’s heartbreaking and it’s really un-American. You say, “Wait a minute. This is not our country; we shouldn’t have to play bingo to get a good education.” That’s the harsh realization, but the other emotion that comes out of the movie is a sense of hope. In the last 10 years, there is a new generation of reformers who are doing an amazing job, in every city across the country. They’re starting to break the code on how you can educate kids, even in the toughest neighborhoods. So there’s a lot of hope if we focus on these reforms and smart reforms, and put away all the adult problems, we can actually start helping kids. MTV : Is there a call to action at the end? Davis Guggenheim : Yeah, there really is. The call to action is, “The stakes are even higher than we thought; it affects all of us. But we can do it and it takes people stepping up, being outraged, and demanding that our schools are great for every kid.” MTV: What is the first thing the average American who sees the film and wants to do something can do? Davis Guggenheim : The first step is to be informed. What I find is that a lot of people think they know what’s going on but really don’t. With No Child Left Behind, you can actually go on and learn the scores of your school. But I think that the best way is to go see this movie. Like “An Inconvenient Truth,” it became this primer, this experience people had and they shared with each other and became empowered to fight for change. When that happens, anything is possible. Some people might go in and tutor a kid, another might want to become a teacher, other people might want to reform their school district. That’s what a film does — it creates a conversation and inspires people to incite change. MTV : What has the response been like so far? Davis Guggenheim : Even moreso than “An Inconvenient Truth,” and I never thought I’d have an experience that would surpass “An Inconvenient Truth.” But even more than [that film], there has been this rallying around the movie. Paramount, a major movie studio, decides to release it. At Sundance there were standing ovations, tears, people are coming up to me and saying “I want to help this one kid, I want to pay for their private school,” “I want to reform my district.” It’s very exciting to see a movie like this have this effect on people. MTV : Moving forward, aside from having made the film and getting the word out, what is next? Davis Guggenheim : Well I’m trying to raise three good kids and make sure, even with a private school, that they have a great education. But it’s not enough to make the movie, I’m on a campaign to fix our schools. … Next month I’m in a different city every day getting people to join our conversation on how to fix our schools. MTV : Well, now it’s understandable why you were a little too busy to tackle the Justin Bieber concert movie. Davis Guggenheim : [ He laughs. ] I think they found someone more talented than me. [But] my daughters love him and my 4-year-old still thinks she’s going to marry him. … It’s so cute. I like his music. MTV : So it was just a matter of too-busy schedules and timing? Davis Guggenheim : Scheduling, timing and I needed to serve this movie first. I have to spend the next six months on this. From the saucy Jessica Alba in “Little Fockers” to James Franco’s grueling journey in “127 Hours,” the MTV Movies team is delving into the hottest flicks of fall 2010. Check back daily for exclusive clips, photos and interviews with the films’ biggest stars. Check out everything we’ve got on “Waiting for Superman.” For breaking news, celebrity columns, humor and more — updated around the clock — visit MTVMoviesBlog.com . Related Videos 2010 Sundance Film Festival Video Highlights Related Photos Sundance Film Festival 2010

See original here:
‘Waiting For Superman’ Director Hopes Film Will Help U.S. Schools

What a Waste of an Oil Disaster

Image credit: Oliver Bernstein, Sierra Club. With media coverage of the country’s worst oil spill fading away, recent decisions on how to handle tens of thousands of tons of boom and oily waste are going to affect people along the Gulf for years to come. That’s because BP is relying on public complacency to get away with dumping its clean-up waste in local landfills , where hazardous oily residues and chemicals, like benzene, will either slowly slither their way into nearby water streams or evaporate and affect air quality. While this pl… Read the full story on TreeHugger

Link:
What a Waste of an Oil Disaster