Tag Archives: defense

Moral Decay Within the Pentagon the Cause of Leaks Revealed by Wikileaks

Corporate corruption of the defense industry is at the heart of the motivation that leads insiders to leak information to Wikileaks. Honest everyday people that work for the government and its myriad of private contractors in the capitalist world are morally repulsed by the information that they are being charged with keeping secret represent to their sense of honoring their other sense for justice and truth. They cannot help themselves but reveal the corruption because it is morally repugnant to them. +++ The leak may have come from the State Department itself The controversy and the caliber of the information have led some political analysts to the conclusion that it could only have leaked from the State Department itself, which puts its efficiency under question. Vitaly Leibin, the chief editor of Russian Reporter, a magazine which claims to officially collaborate with WikiLeaks, also believes that the leaks are the result of people inside the US government wanting the information exposed. “These leaks would never have happened if not for the number of insiders who are ready to leak this information. It looks like it’s linked to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan when officers understood that they are working for a not exactly fair business, and this moral decay inside the Pentagon caused these leaks,” he said. “The main thing this leak has done is break the illusion that the State department has everything under control. There have been exposed mechanisms – not secret, but quite simple and cynical. Partners of the US will be more careful now. It’s another sign that the US is no longer dominating the world,” he added. What the WikiLeaks incident shows is how the whole intelligence community has become over-reliant on technology, said former intelligence officer Glenmore Trenear-Harvey. He pointed out the inherent problems with the Secret Internet Protocol, a system of networks used by the US Defense and State Departments to transmit classified information that is one of the alleged sources of the leak. “The idea was for an exchange of information after 9/11, when the intelligent services weren’t sharing their information together,” he said. “Now what has happened is that whereas maybe 40,000 people within the intelligence community would have access, suddenly, bizarrely, diplomats, military people and, indeed, intelligence people – there’s over 2 million people that had access to it.” +++ Now that these revelations are making governments reconsider their security I would venture to say that this is going to lead to an extended cyberwar along with resistance from states to support some of the security measures that will likely be proposed by US lawmakers. added by: jubal

Military Bans Disks, Threatens Courts-Martial to Stop New Leaks

It’s too late to stop WikiLeaks from publishing thousands more classified documents, nabbed from the Pentagon’s secret network. But the U.S. military is telling its troops to stop using CDs, DVDs, thumb drives and every other form of removable media — or risk a court martial. Maj. Gen. Richard Webber, commander of Air Force Network Operations, issued the Dec. 3 “Cyber Control Order” — obtained by Danger Room — which directs airmen to “immediately cease use of removable media on all systems, servers, and stand alone machines residing on SIPRNET,” the Defense Department’s secret network. Similar directives have gone out to the military’s other branches. “Unauthorized data transfers routinely occur on classified networks using removable media and are a method the insider threat uses to exploit classified information. To mitigate the activity, all Air Force organizations must immediately suspend all SIPRNET data transfer activities on removable media,” the order adds. It’s one of a number of moves the Defense Department is making to prevent further disclosures of secret information in the wake of the WikiLeaks document dumps. Pfc. Bradley Manning says he downloaded hundreds of thousands of files from SIPRNET to a CD marked “Lady Gaga” before giving the files to WikiLeaks. To stop that from happening again, an August internal review suggested that the Pentagon disable all classified computers’ ability to write to removable media. About 60 percent of military machines are now connected to a Host Based Security System, which looks for anomalous behavior. And now there’s this disk-banning order. One military source who works on these networks says it will make the job harder; classified computers are often disconnected from the network, or are in low-bandwidth areas. A DVD or a thumb drive is often the easiest way to get information from one machine to the next. “They were asking us to build homes before,” the source says. “Now they’re taking away our hammers.” The order acknowledges that the ban will make life trickier for some troops. “Users will experience difficulty with transferring data for operational needs which could impede timeliness on mission execution,” the document admits. But “military personnel who do not comply … may be punished under Article 92 of the Uniformed Code of Military Justice.” Article 92 is the armed forces’ regulation covering failure to obey orders and dereliction of duty, and it stipulates that violators “shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.” But to several Defense Department insiders, the steps taken so far to prevent another big secret data dump have been surprisingly small. “After all the churn…. The general perception is business as usual. I’m not kidding,” one of those insiders says. “We haven’t turned a brain cell on it.” Tape and disk backups, as well as hard drive removals, will continue as normal in the military’s Secure Compartmented Information Facilities, where top-secret information is discussed and handled. And removable drives have been banned on SIPRNET before. Two years ago, the Pentagon forbade the media’s use after the drives and disks helped spread a relatively unsophisticated worm onto hundreds of thousands of computers. The ban was lifted this February, after the worm cleanup effort, dubbed “Operational Buckshot Yankee,” was finally completed. Shortly thereafter, Manning says he started passing information to WikiLeaks. Specialists at the National Security Agency are looking for additional technical ways to limit, disable or audit military users’ actions. Darpa, the Pentagon’s leading-edge research arm, has launched an effort to “greatly increase the accuracy, rate and speed with which insider threats are detected … within government and military interest networks.” But, like all Darpa projects, this one won’t be ready to deploy for years — if ever. For now, the Pentagon is stuck with more conventional methods to WikiLeak-proof its networks. http://m.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/12/military-bans-disks-threatens-courts-marti… added by: ras_menelik

Military Bans Disks, Threatens Courts-Martial to Stop New Leaks

It’s too late to stop WikiLeaks from publishing thousands more classified documents, nabbed from the Pentagon’s secret network. But the U.S. military is telling its troops to stop using CDs, DVDs, thumb drives and every other form of removable media — or risk a court martial. Maj. Gen. Richard Webber, commander of Air Force Network Operations, issued the Dec. 3 “Cyber Control Order” — obtained by Danger Room — which directs airmen to “immediately cease use of removable media on all systems, servers, and stand alone machines residing on SIPRNET,” the Defense Department’s secret network. Similar directives have gone out to the military’s other branches. “Unauthorized data transfers routinely occur on classified networks using removable media and are a method the insider threat uses to exploit classified information. To mitigate the activity, all Air Force organizations must immediately suspend all SIPRNET data transfer activities on removable media,” the order adds. It’s one of a number of moves the Defense Department is making to prevent further disclosures of secret information in the wake of the WikiLeaks document dumps. Pfc. Bradley Manning says he downloaded hundreds of thousands of files from SIPRNET to a CD marked “Lady Gaga” before giving the files to WikiLeaks. To stop that from happening again, an August internal review suggested that the Pentagon disable all classified computers’ ability to write to removable media. About 60 percent of military machines are now connected to a Host Based Security System, which looks for anomalous behavior. And now there’s this disk-banning order. One military source who works on these networks says it will make the job harder; classified computers are often disconnected from the network, or are in low-bandwidth areas. A DVD or a thumb drive is often the easiest way to get information from one machine to the next. “They were asking us to build homes before,” the source says. “Now they’re taking away our hammers.” The order acknowledges that the ban will make life trickier for some troops. “Users will experience difficulty with transferring data for operational needs which could impede timeliness on mission execution,” the document admits. But “military personnel who do not comply … may be punished under Article 92 of the Uniformed Code of Military Justice.” Article 92 is the armed forces’ regulation covering failure to obey orders and dereliction of duty, and it stipulates that violators “shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.” But to several Defense Department insiders, the steps taken so far to prevent another big secret data dump have been surprisingly small. “After all the churn…. The general perception is business as usual. I’m not kidding,” one of those insiders says. “We haven’t turned a brain cell on it.” Tape and disk backups, as well as hard drive removals, will continue as normal in the military’s Secure Compartmented Information Facilities, where top-secret information is discussed and handled. And removable drives have been banned on SIPRNET before. Two years ago, the Pentagon forbade the media’s use after the drives and disks helped spread a relatively unsophisticated worm onto hundreds of thousands of computers. The ban was lifted this February, after the worm cleanup effort, dubbed “Operational Buckshot Yankee,” was finally completed. Shortly thereafter, Manning says he started passing information to WikiLeaks. Specialists at the National Security Agency are looking for additional technical ways to limit, disable or audit military users’ actions. Darpa, the Pentagon’s leading-edge research arm, has launched an effort to “greatly increase the accuracy, rate and speed with which insider threats are detected … within government and military interest networks.” But, like all Darpa projects, this one won’t be ready to deploy for years — if ever. For now, the Pentagon is stuck with more conventional methods to WikiLeak-proof its networks. http://m.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/12/military-bans-disks-threatens-courts-marti… added by: ras_menelik

Senate DADT Vote Fails

Supporters of “don't ask, don't tell” repeal in the current lame-duck session of Congress were dealt a major blow Thursday when the U.S. Senate failed to move forward on the national defense bill. The vote to proceed to debate on the defense bill, of which DADT repeal is a component, was 57-40 —three votes shy of the 60 votes that Democrats needed. Though Republican senator Susan Collins of Maine voted to support moving forward on the defense bill, no Republicans colleague followed suit. Senators crucial to repeal voted No, including senators Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, Scott Brown of Massachusetts, and Olympia Snowe of Maine. The failed vote comes after intense negotiations in the senate, where independent Sen. Joe Lieberman served as a de facto intermediary between Democratic Senate majority leader Reid and Collins, who supports the repeal of “don't ask, don't tell” but urged a “fair and open” process for the Defense Authorization spending bill. On Wednesday evening, Reid had postponed a full vote in the Senate on the bill that includes language to repeal the military's ban on openly gay and lesbian troops. Reid on Thursday criticized Republican opposition to moving ahead on the defense bill as harmful not only to DADT repeal, but to the armed forces as a whole. “Despite the critical importance for our troops, for our nation, and for justice that we get this bill done, we have not been able to reach an agreement,” Reid said earlier this afternoon. “And I regret to say that it is our troops who will pay the price for our inability to overcome partisan political posturing.” Update: Servicemembers United executive director Alex Nicholson called on Congress to pass DADT repeal as a stand-alone bill, issuing the following statement after the vote: “This was a major failure on the part of the Senate to simply do its job and pass an annual defense authorization bill. Politics prevailed over responsibility today, and now more than one million American servicemembers, including tens of thousands of gay and lesbian troops, are worse off as a result. “Since the votes are there in isolation, the Senate should still consider a stand-alone bill to repeal the 'don't ask, don't tell' law before adjourning for the winter holidays,” Nicholson said. added by: TimALoftis

Senate DADT Vote Fails

Supporters of “don't ask, don't tell” repeal in the current lame-duck session of Congress were dealt a major blow Thursday when the U.S. Senate failed to move forward on the national defense bill. The vote to proceed to debate on the defense bill, of which DADT repeal is a component, was 57-40 —three votes shy of the 60 votes that Democrats needed. Though Republican senator Susan Collins of Maine voted to support moving forward on the defense bill, no Republicans colleague followed suit. Senators crucial to repeal voted No, including senators Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, Scott Brown of Massachusetts, and Olympia Snowe of Maine. The failed vote comes after intense negotiations in the senate, where independent Sen. Joe Lieberman served as a de facto intermediary between Democratic Senate majority leader Reid and Collins, who supports the repeal of “don't ask, don't tell” but urged a “fair and open” process for the Defense Authorization spending bill. On Wednesday evening, Reid had postponed a full vote in the Senate on the bill that includes language to repeal the military's ban on openly gay and lesbian troops. Reid on Thursday criticized Republican opposition to moving ahead on the defense bill as harmful not only to DADT repeal, but to the armed forces as a whole. “Despite the critical importance for our troops, for our nation, and for justice that we get this bill done, we have not been able to reach an agreement,” Reid said earlier this afternoon. “And I regret to say that it is our troops who will pay the price for our inability to overcome partisan political posturing.” Update: Servicemembers United executive director Alex Nicholson called on Congress to pass DADT repeal as a stand-alone bill, issuing the following statement after the vote: “This was a major failure on the part of the Senate to simply do its job and pass an annual defense authorization bill. Politics prevailed over responsibility today, and now more than one million American servicemembers, including tens of thousands of gay and lesbian troops, are worse off as a result. “Since the votes are there in isolation, the Senate should still consider a stand-alone bill to repeal the 'don't ask, don't tell' law before adjourning for the winter holidays,” Nicholson said. added by: TimALoftis

Controversial Drug Given to All Guantanamo Detainees Akin to “Pharmacologic Waterboarding”

A two-month investigation lead by Truthout’s Jason Leopold and Jeffrey Kaye reveals for the first time that the Defense Department forced all “war on terror” detainees at the Guantanamo Bay prison to take a high dosage of a controversial antimalarial drug, mefloquine, an act that an Army public health physician called “pharmacologic waterboarding.” added by: joeeddy

Spam Relief Update, Part 2

As many of you have correctly pointed out, we've been facing a bit of an influx of spam on Current lately. We talked about some of the defense we put in place earlier, and today we're happy to say we've launched the next component in our spam defense! We've implemented a new filtering system that should prevent the majority of the spam from seeing the light of day. It's been less than 24 hours, and we've already seen a great deal of spam get caught up in the nets. However, as with any new system, we'll still be tweaking the levels and adjusting things to achieve optimum spam defeating levels. While we're doing this, the occassional bit of spam may slip through, so if you see any please flag it for us, so we can help teach the filters to better recognize spam. You may also find that some of your comments get caught up in the net. We're doing our best to make sure this doesn't happen, but if you try to post a comment and don't see it appear, that's likely the cause. We will be going through these comments and fishing out anything that's mistakenly caught up in the spam net. Thanks to all of you for your flags and patience while we dealt with spam–and especially for making us laugh with some of your spam flags! The LOL badges many of you earned were well-deserved, and made dealing with the influx of spammers much more entertaining. StephOnline Community Team added by: sgwhites

Katy Perry AMA Performance: Did "Firework" Fizzle?

We love Katy Perry personally and think some of her songs are really catchy, but her live singing skills were a bit suspect at the American Music Awards. It’s hard to watch her rendition of “Firework” (below) and not think that, but that’s just our opinion. What do you think? Did she knock it out of the park? In her defense, at least she TRIED to sing live, which is more than we can say for some of the no-talent hacks who masquerade as musicians. Also, the boys’ choir was a nice touch, and that tear-away dress? An even nicer touch … Katy Perry: Firework (Live at the AMAs)

Excerpt from:
Katy Perry AMA Performance: Did "Firework" Fizzle?

NRDC’s ‘Clean by Design’ Could Save China Textile Mills 16 MMT of Water Annually

Fabric samples from Redbud factory in China. Image courtesy of NRDC . At the Clinton Global Initiative on Wednesday, Walmart announced its work with the Natural Resources Defense Council’s ( NRDC ) Clean by Design project–which is aimed at cleaning up China’s tex… Read the full story on TreeHugger

See the article here:
NRDC’s ‘Clean by Design’ Could Save China Textile Mills 16 MMT of Water Annually

Katy Perry bare ass picture

Katy Perry upskirt leaving Dusty#39;s Cafe in Silverlake. The wind blew up Katy Perry#39;s skirt yesterday and almost exposed her bare ass. “But doesn#39;t she wear panties?” Trust me, she doesn#39;t. You#39;d be amazed at the things you find out when you get a couple of bottles of champagne in her. For example, she hates Asians. Believe me, I was quite shocked when I found out. A lady should not be using that kind of language. Katy Perry has come to the defense of fiance Russell Brand, who wa

View original post here:
Katy Perry bare ass picture