Marg Helgenberger is some CSI star who just quit CSI because I assume she doesn’t want to by typecast, even though she’s been on the shit for what must feel like 2 decades and is only known for being on the shit…and only matters cuz of the shit…and can only afford her lavish lifestyle cus of the shit…leaving her with a blank slate of career options….at least in her mind….when in reality all she has to look forward to is Dancing with the Stars…which in her defense is probably a bigger show that CSI any day….you just don’t really get paid to be on it and it pretty much leads to no where….lots to look forward to while I look at her armpit and imagine smelling it, sucking it, and fucking it…cuz other lady parts are so played out and mainstream…
I have spent a lot of time shitting on Scarlett Johansson for being overratted, not nearly as hot as people think she is, maybe boring and raspy and all hype….I have called her dumpy, sloppy, big nosed….and people have actually sent me hate mail calling me a faggot cuz they assume all those things mean I wouldn’t fuck her…when really it just means I fuck hotter girls that her locally….when drunk…. I think these pictures at the We Bought a Zoo Premiere….prove my fucking point…. But in her defense, I am a fan, you know since she leaked nudes and didn’t sue me like the rest of the dumb sluts who leak nudes do…. Awesome.
It’s time for this nasty muhfugga to go down!!! All eight of the boys allegedly sexually abused by former Penn State coach Jerry Sandusky will testify against him when preliminary hearings in the case begin next week, according to people close to the case. News that all eight victims will testify against Sandusky is a blow to his defense. Sandusky’s lawyer, Joe Amendola, previously told ABC News that at least one of the boys had denied that he was abused. Sandusky is accused of molesting eight boys over a 15-year period. A key allegation against the 67-year-old former coach was that he was seen raping a boy about the age of 10 in the showers in 2002. The grand jury report said the identity of the boy, called Victim 2, was not known, but Amendola told ABC News that he believed the defense knew who the boy was and talked to him. “The kid is … now grown up, he’s in his 20s. He’s adamant that nothing sexual occurred,” Amendola said last month. The lawyer said that, at the time of the accusation, Sandusky provided the boys name to Penn State after he was confronted with accusation. Amendola said he expected others might also come forward in Sandusky’s defense. Attorney Michael Boni, who represents the now-teenage boy known as Victim Number 1 — who was the first to come forward to accuse Sandusky — said that the times with the former coach were horrifying for the victims of his alleged crimes. “These were, quote, ‘precious’ moments for him,” Boni said. “In fact, they were the most vile, horrendous, unspeakable moments for his victims.” Dr. Michael Welner, an ABC News consultant and a forensic psychiatrist, said he finds the evidence against Sandusky compelling. “They had a discussion in this interview about barriers,” said Welner. “There are no barriers. Sexual assault is a process; it’s the end point of a process of grooming. It didn’t just happen, he orchestrated it, and yet to see that interview, you would think that it just happened, and it’s up to you as a jury or audience to see whether it’s illegal or not.” Truly disgusting. SMH at “precious moments”…this sick bastard needs to be locked up forever. Source
Zoe Saldana and Jurnee Smollett attended the Children’s Defense Fund California ‘Beat The Odds’ Awards in Los Angeles. You already know the drill… Who Looked More Bangin???? Jurnee had her husband Josian Bell with her as well…they are such a lovely couple. More images below: WENN
It’s a battle of the comedies on NextMovie’s new MovieTracker. By Eric Ditzian Ben Stiller and Gabourey Sidibe in “Tower Heist” Photo: Universal Pictures For the past few days, following an early Times Square screening, the MTV Newsroom has been buzzing about “A Very Harold & Kumar 3D Christmas.” “Can you believe it was actually damn funny?” one movie nerd would say to another. “I mean, the last one stunk.” That’s the buzz in here. And out there too, a fact that our friends at NextMovie have made abundantly clear with their new MovieTracker , a cool application boasting a fancy-schmancy algorithm that measures what people are saying on Twitter and Facebook and lets us know which movies people are psyched about. Think of it like a Billboard music chart, but instead of tracking album sales, it tracks Internet movie buzz in real time. As of this writing, “Harold & Kumar” has risen to the #2 slot, with loads of positive tweets coming in. The public seems to be in agreement with star John Cho, who told MTV News recently of his onscreen partnership with Kal Penn, “We are without a doubt the best Korean-Indian stoner comedy duo in cinematic history.” It’s going to be a very comedy-centric weekend at the multiplex, which is honestly a bit confounding from a programming standpoint. Yes, the hard-R “Harold & Kumar” and the PG-13 “Tower Heist” are targeting different moviegoers, but there’s undoubtedly some overlap between those two audiences. And “Tower Heist” is going to come out on top, even if it’s currently trending one notch below “Harold & Kumar” on the MovieTracker. (Last week’s big winner, “Paranormal Activity 3,” was planted at #1 at press time.) Expect “Tower Heist,” starring Ben Stiller and Eddie Murphy, to reel in around $30 million this weekend. “Harold & Kumar” will probably fall shy of the $20 million mark. Will the MovieTracker adjust to reflect these box-office predictions? Keep checking back to see what’s up and what’s down, what’s buzzing and what’s bombing all weekend long. Check out everything we’ve got on “A Very Harold & Kumar 3D Christmas” and “Tower Heist.” For breaking news, celebrity columns, humor and more — updated around the clock — visit MTVMoviesBlog.com . Related Videos NextMovie’s ‘Movie Tracker’ Brings You Real-Time Buzz MTV Rough Cut: Tower Heist Related Photos ‘A Very Harold & Kumar 3D Christmas’ Key Scenes From The Trailer
Two lawyers watching the case weigh in on who presented strongest argument in Conrad Murray trial. By Gil Kaufman Dr. Conrad Murray (file) Photo: Getty Images It’s up to the jury now. After six weeks of testimony , the seven-man, five-woman jury in the involuntary manslaughter case of former Michael Jackson doctor Conrad Murray began their deliberations Friday morning (November 4). They’ve heard from 49 witnesses, including some of Jackson’s former employees, a number of Murray’s girlfriends and patients, medical experts, police investigators and ER workers. In closing arguments on Thursday, prosecutor David Walgren told them the evidence the state presented was “overwhelming” and showed that it was “abundantly clear” that Murray caused Jackson’s death by acting in a negligent manner in providing the singer with the surgical anesthetic propofol in a non-hospital setting. It capped weeks of prosecution testimony that pointed to the many alleged breaches of professional conduct by Murray, who Walgren painted as an opportunist lured by a big payday into providing medical services that were out of the norm, dangerous and, ultimately, deadly. Defense attorney Ed Chernoff countered with arguments that investigators were sloppy in collecting evidence and that it was Jackson, not Murray who was to blame because, according to the defense, the 50-year-old singer self-administered the fatal propofol dose that took his life on June 25, 2009. As we await the jury’s verdict, we asked a pair of lawyers not affiliated with the case to break down both sides’ arguments and weigh in on how each did in presenting their cases. “If he’s convicted, I’m not sure it will be due to any tactical errors on the part of his defense team,” said Robert Weisberg, a law professor at Stanford University and faculty co-director of the school’s criminal justice center. “This case does not jump out at me as one where there was any alternative strategy. If he’s convicted, it’s because he’s guilty, and based on the evidence it’s not looking good for him.” Weisberg praised the prosecution’s case, pointing out the strength of the rebuttal testimony of prosecution anesthesia expert Dr. Steven Shafer, who was recalled to the stand to poke holes in the alternate death scenario laid out by defense witness Dr. Paul White . Los Angeles-based criminal defense attorney Mike Cavalluzzi said he thought the prosecution told a “great and very tight” story over the course of the trial, beginning with Jackson’s longtime confidant and director/choreographer Kenny Ortega . It was the “This Is It” director who opened testimony in late September by telling the jury “my friend wasn’t right,” setting the chaotic scene at the rehearsals for the show. As for the investigative mistakes that Murray’s lawyers pointed out during their cross-examination of prosecution witnesses, Cavalluzzi said he felt those arguments were “grasping at straws” by the defense and had no real relevance to the negligence accusations against Murray. “Those felt like red herrings,” said Cavalluzzi, who has worked a range of criminal matters in L.A. courts from misdemeanor battery to homicide. “There was very compelling evidence from doctors about the extreme deviations from standard care by Murray even before June 25, by administering propofol in a residential setting and then laying out, piece-by-piece, how many deviations there were.” He also said that the testimony of nurse practitioner Cherilyn Lee , who was called by the defense, was very compelling. “I’m not sure it helped the defense,” Cavalluzzi said. “She said Jackson was begging for propofol and she knew never to accede to that request. It made the defense position so difficult when every objective medical professional said the conduct Murray engaged in was extremely dangerous.” What could the defense have done differently? Weisberg said he wouldn’t fault them for the case they put up, aside from what he called the very unusual tactic of voluntarily having Murray speak to police in a taped interview two days after Jackson’s death. The jury has to bring back a unanimous verdict on the single felony count, and Cavalluzzi said what they most likely took away from the testimony of the doctor and nurses who took the stand for the defense is that Murray should not have been administering propofol to any patient, let alone someone who clearly had substance abuse issues like Michael Jackson. “The character witnesses were brought up to make you think that Dr. Murray is a nice person, but involuntary manslaughter is not a crime of moral turpitude,” Cavalluzzi explained. “It is not a crime which bad people engage in bad behavior. Nobody is accusing Dr. Murray of stealing or intentionally harming anyone. What they’re saying is that he may have been a good man who made a horrible mistake and that the mistake that he made rises to criminal negligence, which makes him guilty of involuntary manslaughter.” If Murray gets off, though, Cavalluzzi predicted it would be because of his generous reputation as laid out by former patients , which could cause some doubt as to whether Murray did something that killed Michael Jackson or if Jackson administered the fatal dose himself. “It’s a very, very tough case,” he said. “I think it’s compelling in so many ways, as an insight into the genius of Michael Jackson and the price he paid … he wanted to deliver such an extraordinary concert and that, it killed him.” MTV News will be covering the Conrad Murray verdict live. Go to MTVNews.com for breaking news, reactions and analysis from Los Angeles or tune to MTV for the latest updates. Related Videos Remembering Michael Jackson – One Year Later Related Photos Michael Jackson: A Life In Photos Related Artists Michael Jackson
The Dr. Conrad Murray involuntary manslaughter trial is just about over. The defense has rested its case – or what little it seemingly had – and is now gearing up for closing arguments, which are scheduled to begin Thursday morning. According to reports, the defense won’t be submitting any new evidence, so if they haven’t needled the jury with reasonable doubt yet … it will take a miracle. Murray faces up to four years if convicted in the death of Michael Jackson . After closing arguments, the jury will begin to deliberate immediately, and it seems likely they’ll reach a verdict by Friday, assuming closing arguments don’t drag on. The prosecution rested its case over a week ago, and while you can’t rule anything out as far as what juries will conclude, their case felt awfully close to air tight. The D.A. hammered him over his medical decision making, and put a pretty strong damper on the notion that Michael Jackson killed himself , as Murray claims. Murray’s star witness was also held in contempt today. What do you think? Dr. Conrad Murray …
Dr. Conrad Murray will no longer be taking the stand to testify in his own defense in the involuntary manslaughter trial stemming from Michael Jackson’s 2009 death. This marks a reversal of his original plan to testify . Murray told his lawyers from day one that he wants to testify and tell his side of the story, but his lead attorney, Ed Chernoff, believes it’s not worth the risk. His reasoning is simple: Murray wouldn’t be able to withstand a tough cross examination that the DA would subject him to, and would hurt his own cause . “Clients always want to testify, but in this case, the D.A. would wear him down, and Murray just wouldn’t be able to overcome the basic facts,” says a source. To name a few: ” not calling 911 right away , failure to tell ER doctors and EMTs that he gave Jackson Propofol, not having the proper monitoring equipment.” The defense’s final witness, Dr. Paul White, testified Friday that Michael Jackson killed himself with a lethal injection by mistake with Murray out of the room. That long shot theory is probably Murray’s only hope of a not guilty verdict, but Deputy D.A. David Walgren still has a chance to cross examine him today. Moreover, after the defense formally rests their case, prosecutors – who have made a very strong case thus far – can call additional rebuttal witnesses. The trial resumes this morning in Los Angeles.
First, he took us behind the scenes of his upcoming video for “Mistletoe.” Now, Justin Bieber is giving fans an actual look at the video itself. The full version premieres at 7:54 p.m. EST on Tuesday, but the following 30 seconds give viewers a fun look at what’s to come, from Justin singing on a snow-covered street to posing in a photo booth with a Selena Gomez lookalike. Look for Justin to give MTV News a full interview as well on Tuesday night, immediately following this premiere. But enough teasing! Enjoy this sneak peek below: Justin Bieber Music Video Sneak Peek
Maroon 5 singer Adam Levine is rarely opposed to getting naked. His girlfriend, Anne Vyalitsyna, can more than likely attest to that. This is a new one for both of them, though: Together, Adam and Anne bare all in the new issue of Russian Vogue , photographed in a passionate, nude embrace … Anne Vyalitsyna has been dating Levine since Spring 2010 . Vyalitsyna, a Sports Illustrated swimsuit model, previously appeared in a few of Maroon 5’s music videos, for “Misery” and “Never Gonna Leave This Bed.” We have absolutely no idea what the article is about (language barrier and all), but does it matter? Check out more hot, nude pics of Adam and Anne here: [Photos: Vogue Russia]
