Tag Archives: democrat

Jerry Brown Calls Meg Whitman a Nazi, Media Mostly Mum

California’s Democrat gubernatorial candidate Jerry Brown on Tuesday called his Republican rival Meg Whitman a Nazi. You probably didn’t hear about this because America’s media largely ignored it.  By contrast, the press had a field day when Republican senatorial candidate Carly Fiorina made a comment about Barbara Boxer’s (D-Calif.) hair that was picked up by an open microphone Tuesday evening. Why the double standard? Consider your answer as you read what Brown told KCBS radio’s Doug Sovern (h/t NBer Gary Hall): Brown boasted about his legendary frugality. “I’ve only spent $200,000 so far. I have 20 million in the bank. I’m saving up for her.” It’s true – his stay-on-the-sidelines, bare-bones primary run cost him almost nothing, at least in California political terms. But he also fretted about the impact of all those eBay dollars in Whitman’s very deep pockets. “You know, by the time she’s done with me, two months from now, I’ll be a child-molesting…” He let the line trail off. “She’ll have people believing whatever she wants about me.” Then he went off on a riff I didn’t expect. “It’s like Goebbels,” referring to Hitler’s notorious Minister of Propaganda. “Goebbels invented this kind of propaganda. He took control of the whole world. She wants to be president. That’s her ambition, the first woman president. That’s what this is all about.” Sovern followed this up Thursday: The campaign of Meg Whitman has issued the following statement in response to the comments made by Jerry Brown, quoted in my blog posting “Run Jerry Run.” “Just last week, Governor Brown promised he wasn’t going to engage in mudslinging, but now he is comparing Meg Whitman to Hitler’s Minister of Propaganda, Joseph Goebbels. Jerry Brown’s statements comparing our campaign to a propagator of the Holocaust is deeply offensive and entirely unacceptable.” –Meg Whitman 2010 Campaign Manager Jillian Hasner Jerry Brown’s campaign spokesman, Sterling Clifford, confirms to the Associated Press that the conversation took place, describing it as “a discussion after a chance meeting while they were exercising. I wouldn’t vouch for the accuracy of it, but I also don’t want to dispute the accuracy of it. It was jogging talk taken out of context.” He says Brown was not comparing the Whitman campaign to Nazis. UPDATE: Friday afternoon, Jerry Brown issued the following statement: “I regret making the comments. They were taken out of context.” Pretty serious stuff happening in America’s most-populated state, wouldn’t you agree? Yet our media weren’t very interested. Although Politico reported this matter late Thursday evening, as did the Associated Press shortly after, the rest of our supposedly impartial press almost completed ignored Brown’s disgusting remarks. According to Google news and LexisNexis searches, the news divisions of by ABC, CBS, MSNBC, and NBC didn’t file one report on this subject through Friday evening. NOT ONE! I can also find no newspaper reports outside of California. Zero, nada, zilch!  Bucking the trend was Fox News during Friday’s “Special Report” and CNN’s Jack Cafferty giving it a mention on the same day’s “Situation Room.” By contrast, when Fiorina was caught on an open microphone saying that Boxer’s hair was “so yesterday,” the media had a field day. CNN has already done eleven reports on this vital matter impacting our nation. MSNBC’s done three. On the broadcast networks, NBC did three reports, ABC did two, and CBS did one. Those actually included a segment on ABC’s “World News with Diane Sawyer”    As for newspapers, the New York Times, the Washington Post, the New York Daily News, and the Houston chronicle all found Fiorina saying Boxer’s hair was “so yesterday” newsworthy.  I guess our media must think a Republican commenting about a rival’s hair is FAR MORE IMPORTANT than a Democrat calling a political opponent a Nazi. Boggles the mind, doesn’t it? 

Read the original post:
Jerry Brown Calls Meg Whitman a Nazi, Media Mostly Mum

MRC-TV: Bozell Discusses Helen Thomas on ‘Hannity,’ Recent Primaries on ‘Fox & Friends’

If you ask the media, George W. Bush is to blame for everything from the BP Gulf of Mexico oil spill to Al and Tipper Gore’s broken marriage. What’s more, the media are insisting, it’s Democrat Hillary Clinton who deserves praise for paving the way for Republican women having success on Tuesday’s primaries, not Sarah Palin. That’s just skimming the surface of the loopy stuff the liberal media have churned out recently and which NewsBusters publisher Brent Bozell was brought on last night’s “Hannity” to address. Also discussed on the June 10 “Media Mash” segment, the media’s sensitive treatment of disgraced columnist Helen Thomas, who abruptly “retired” following a controversy regarding her suggestion that Israelis should “get the hell out of Palestine” and go back to Germany and Poland [MP3 audio available here ; WMV video for download here ]: BRENT BOZELL: If I were Helen Thomas, I wonder, what is she more offended by, conservatives who call her a socialist and a radical, or her liberal friends who’ve all gone on national television to say she’s senile? And if it is true that she is that senile, what was she doing in the White House all these years? Here’s a woman who has spent decades with this anti-Semitic vicious vitriol that she spews out. And here they are all marching behind her.  SEAN HANNITY: You guys also picked this up years ago, because there were other things that she had said. BOZELL: And she’s the grande dame of journalism. This is a woman, I think it’s time for her to go fishing. This morning, the Media Research Center president also appeared on “Fox & Friends” to discuss the strangest story to come out of the primary season thus far: Alvin Greene, South Carolina Democrats’ nominee for Senate who’s facing criminal lewd conduct [MP3 audio of the segment here ; WMV video of the segment here ]: BRIAN KILMEADE: There was a problem with this Alvin Greene and some charges about him that are unsavory. Brent, can you imagine if this was a Republican? BOZELL: Well, if it were a Republican,  it would be on the news every single night. Now, this is going to be news just because there’s some head-scratching going on [about how Greene even won the Democratic nomination]. And I think what’s also been happening here, it shows the lack of resources that the media have today. You know, once upon a time, everybody had a thousand reporters out there in the field and they knew the stories that were happening. There really was an oversight on this, because people aren’t, there aren’t boots on the ground covering these stories. But they’re not seeing this tsunami that’s growing out there. And I’ll tell you something else —   KILMEADE: What do you mean by that? BOZELL: They’re not seeing this Tea Party explosion.  They’re not reading it correctly. They’re not understanding just how big it is and how independent it is.

View original post here:
MRC-TV: Bozell Discusses Helen Thomas on ‘Hannity,’ Recent Primaries on ‘Fox & Friends’

Carville Bashes Zakaria’s Oil Spill Position: ‘I Wanted to Hit Him With a Football Bat’

Democrat strategist James Carville Thursday had strong words for Fareed Zakaria who in an interview recently  published at CNN.com defended President Obama’s handling of the Gulf Coast oil spill. “When I read that I wanted to hit him with a football bat,” Carville told CNN’s John King on the program bearing his name. For those not getting the joke, Carville was mocking Zakaria’s reference to “offensive linebacker” during the interview; only the defense has such a position in football. Carville continued, “This guy, there’s some kind of a breakdown here, because this is a very smart man, and I don’t think that he understands exactly what is going on down here.” The outspoken Democrat later quipped, “[I]f that thing was in Long Island Sound, I guarantee you Fareed Zakaria and all his friends would be going nuts out there” (video follows with transcript and commentary, h/t HotAirPundit ):  JOHN KING,CNN: And James, I want to ask you, the question of presidential leadership in a moment, I want to talk about the economic impact on the state, but since we’re talking about the president, Fareed Zakaria, who writes for “Newsweek”. He obviously hosts a program on this network, CNN, he has been harshly critical in a very different way of the administration, suggesting it is overreacting to the BP oil spill and oversensitive to some of the criticism. Fareed writes this: “What worries me is that we have gotten to the point where we expect the president to somehow magically solve every problem in the world, appear to be doing it and to reflect our anger and emotion. This is a kind of bizarre trivializing of the presidency into some kind of national psychiatrist-in-chief.” And Fareed goes on James to say that you know there are some big challenges out there Asia, Europe, Iran and the world and the president perhaps has been distracted by this oil spill. JAMES CARVILLE: Yes, he talked about an offensive linebacker. And when I read that I wanted to hit him with a football bat, OK? This guy, there’s some kind of a breakdown here, because this is a very smart man. And I don’t think that he understands exactly what is going on down here. I don’t think he understands that an entire culture is at risk, an entire way of life that there is an invasion going here and he is whining about the fact that the president had to cancel a trip to Indonesia to do something about what’s going on in Louisiana. Look, Indonesia’s an important country and we’ve got to deal with it, but last time I checked Louisiana is part here and we want our own shrimp. We don’t want to eat Indonesian shrimp. I mean you know and I just think people like that are — live in a world — if that thing was in Long Island Sound, I guarantee you Fareed Zakaria and all his friends would be going nuts out there. So my point is, is Fareed, come down here, I will show you the multicultural tapestry that is the coastal people of Louisiana. You talking about somebody — you’re talking about Croatians; you are talking about Filipinos, Vietnamese, French. You are talking about all kinds of different people (INAUDIBLE) people from the Canary Islands. This is a wonderful, beautiful culture down here that is under assault. And the idea that somehow or another we are demanding too much of the president’s time (INAUDIBLE) I just think that that — it is a shame that he doesn’t understand what’s going on here. He doesn’t understand the issues of coastal loss that we have had here that we are losing land (INAUDIBLE) Manhattan and I think a lot of these people just want us to take our oil, take our resources and for us to shut up and we are not shutting up this time. (CROSSTALK) MARY MATALIN: John, can I use — can I use his column for a teaching moment, because he does what is a common mistake. He is conflating the government’s inability to plug the damn hole — it is true. They do not have the resources, but then he conflates and it has — it’s a factual error in there — says that it is not the government’s responsibility. It is federal law, the law — federal waters it is a federal law, the feds are absolutely — it is obligated morally and legally to do the containment and the cleanup. Do not conflate those two things and that’s what he does — CARVILLE: And this guy has got a PhD and you got to — (CROSSTALK) KING: Quick timeout. CARVILLE: — make the distinction as we always do here between the rupture site and what’s going on, on the shore. KING: Quick timeout — James and Mary are going to stay with us. We will be back in just a minute. There’s an old saying that a Republican is a Democrat that’s been mugged.  In Carville’s case, it certainly appears that a crisis in his home state has made him lose his love for liberals as well as his ability to shamelessly spin for the Democrat agenda at all costs. Isn’t it nice?

Read more from the original source:
Carville Bashes Zakaria’s Oil Spill Position: ‘I Wanted to Hit Him With a Football Bat’

California Senate Hopeful Mocks Climate Change Threat (Video)

Photo via Wired California Senate hopeful Carly Fiorina is currently the front runner for securing the GOP nomination in the state primary. The former head of Hewlett-Packard is hoping to bolster her conservative cred by attacking longtime incumbent and Democrat Barbara Boxer — for acknowledging that climate change is a national security threat. According to Fiorina’s latest ad, recognizing that global warming is a security issue somehow means that Boxer is soft on terrorism. The ad also displays how poorly Fiorina understands climate change. Watch: … Read the full story on TreeHugger

Here is the original post:
California Senate Hopeful Mocks Climate Change Threat (Video)

Howard Stern swears off "’F’ing Democrats" Forever!

Says Democrats are all “Communists” On his Sirius/XM radio show on Thursday, Howard Stern had some very harsh words for the Federal Communications Commission. From EyeBlast : “I got so crazy over this yesterday, so I called my agent. And my agent, he’s very liberal Democrat kind of guy. I go that’s it! You know what Don. I’ve voted Republican and I’ve voted Democrat. I have vowed I will never vote for a Democrat again. I don’t give a fuck. No matter who they are… The facts are these Democrats at the FCC are Communists… they’re for communism.” At issue is the FCC’s plan to allow some Wireless providers to interfere with satellite radio broadcasts. From SatWaves : Stern discussed the issue live on his show yesterday, quoting and reading directly from an article I wrote several days ago, titled “Will The FCC Interfere With Sirius XM Yet Again?.” With a tone of disgust that should be expected of anyone now familiar with the decade long issue, Stern rightly noted that the FCC seems to go after him no matter where he is, through whatever means possible… Of note, Stern ran briefly in 1994 for the nomination of the Libertarian Party for Governor of New York.

Excerpt from:
Howard Stern swears off "’F’ing Democrats" Forever!

But What If Guam Tips Over?

Please meet Hank Johnson, a Democrat from my home state of Georgia, who is concerned that over-building in Guam might cause the island to capsize. You have to understand that they don't really teach us science in Georgia, just how to seduce our relatives. Watch

US House Approves Landmark Bill to Extend Health Care to Millions

WASHINGTON — Congress gave final approval on Sunday to legislation that would provide medical coverage to tens of millions of uninsured Americans and remake the nation’s health care system along the lines proposed by President Obama. By a vote of 219 to 212, the House passed the bill after a day of tumultuous debate that echoed the epic struggle of the last year. The action sent the bill to President Obama, whose crusade for such legislation has been a hallmark of his presidency. Democrats hailed the vote as historic, comparable to the establishment of Medicare and Social Security and a long overdue step forward in social justice. “This is the civil rights act of the 21st century,” said Representative James E. Clyburn of South Carolina, the No. 3 Democrat in the House. After a year of partisan combat and weeks of legislative brinksmanship, House Democrats and the White House clinched their victory only hours before the voting started on Sunday. They agreed to a deal with opponents of abortion rights within their party to reiterate in an executive order that federal money provided by the bill could not be used for abortions, giving the Democrats the final votes. Democrats said that in expanding access to health coverage for uninsured Americans, they were creating a new program every bit as important as Social Security and Medicare, while also putting downward pressure on rising health care costs and reining in federal budget deficits. Republicans said the plan would saddle the nation with unaffordable levels of debt, leave states with expensive new obligations, weaken Medicare and give the government a huge new role in the health care system. The debate on the legislation has highlighted the deep partisan and ideological divides in the nation and set up a bitter midterm Congressional election campaign, with Republicans promising an effort to repeal it or block its provisions in the states. Representative Marcy Kaptur, Democrat of Ohio, said the bill heralded “a new day in America.” Representative Doris Matsui, Democrat of California, said it would “improve the quality of life for millions of American families.” http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/22/health/policy/22health.html?hp added by: current89

Is Stupak a yes vote on Health Care bill? Dem Chariman says yes, Stupak office will not commit. Update: MSNBC says YES!

A Democratic chairman says a leading abortion foe will back President Barack Obama’s health care bill. But the office of Democratic Rep. Bart Stupak of Michigan says no decision has been made. Rep. Henry Waxman of California says party leaders have been able to secure the support of Stupak. (Read more here ) Well I wish somebody would light a fire under Stupak and get him to stop playing coy and give it up for the President. I just hate a tease. Besides what Democrat could possibly still resist after Obama’s speech yesterday? On the other side of the aisle it looks like the Republicans are making excuses for the vicious outbursts from the Teabaggers.

Texas Conservatives Revise School Textbooks

After three days of turbulent meetings, the Texas Board of Education on Friday voted to approve a social studies curriculum that will put a conservative stamp on history and economics textbooks, stressing the role of Christianity in American history and presenting Republican political philosophies in a more positive light. The vote was 11 to 4, with 10 Republicans and one Democrat voting for the curriculum, and four Democrats voting against. The board, whose members are elected, has influence beyond Texas because the state is one of the largest purchasers of textbooks. In the digital age, however, that influence has been diminished as technological advances have made it possible for publishers to tailor books to individual states. In recent years, board members have been locked in an ideological battle between a bloc of conservatives who question Darwin’s theory of evolution and believe the Founding Fathers were guided by Christian principles and a handful of Democrats and moderate Republicans who have fought to preserve the teaching of Darwinism and the separation of church and state. Since January, Republicans on the board have passed more than 160 amendments to the 120-page curriculum standards affecting history, sociology and economics courses from elementary to high school. The standards were proposed by a board of teachers. Efforts by Hispanic board members to include more Latino figures as role models for the state’s large Hispanic population were consistently defeated, prompting one member, Mary Helen Berlanga, to storm out of a meeting late Thursday night, saying, “They can just pretend this is a white America and Hispanics don’t exist.” “They are going overboard, they are not experts, they are not historians,” she said. “They are rewriting history, not only of Texas but of the United States and the world.” added by: ProjectBat

The Story of Mort Zuckerman, Vanity Publisher and Would-be Senator [Field Guide]

Real estate magnate and publisher Mort Zuckerman , the subject of a profile in today’s Politico , is meeting with New York Republicans as he prepares himself for a Senate run. What do we know about Citizen Mort? Personal The first hurdle facing Mort Zuckerman in his path to the United States Senate is the fact that he is a known Canadian. Zuckerman was born in Montreal, in 1937. (He did become an American citizen in 1977.) Here is a slightly charitable description of Mort’s public persona, courtesy a 1992 New York Times piece: People who have known and worked with him paint a picture of a many-sided man possessed of a genuine warmth and capacity for friendship. But even his staunchest defenders concede that his reputation for flamboyance and self-promotion always precedes him. But while fellow press-hungry would-be mogul Donald Trump was a gaudy vulgarian, Mort had pretensions of class and sophistication. As a 1993 piece in The Independent put it : “Instead of a tacky palace in Palm Beach, there is the elegant house in East Hampton; instead of Ivana, Gloria. Steinem, that is.” Yes, Mort was a swinging bachelor in those days. Gloria Steinem was his most famous squeeze, but he’d also been linked to Nora Ephron and Diane von Furstenberg and Bianca Jagger and even Arianna Huffington. He hasn’t been romantically linked to anyone of note in literally years at this point, though—probably because Page Six is no longer allowed to report on his personal life, and no one else cares to. A Senate run ought to help change that. (The reason for Page Six’s silence: Mort and Rupe negotiated a truce, aided by their shared super-publicist, Howard Rubenstein. The Post still takes potshots at The Daily Snooze , but matters of family are kept out of the columns.) Mort was married to Marla Prather from 1996 through 2001. (Yes, Zuckerman, the former chairman of the Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish Organizations, married a gentile. She went through a quickie conversion to make sure his kid would be a Jew.) His daughter with Marla, Abigail, was born in 1997. Abigail suffered from childhood cancer. After her hospitalization, Zuckerman quickly became a major donor to Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. In December of 2008, the birth of Mortimer’s second daughter, Renee Esther, was announced. The identity of the mother, though, was not announced . Ben Smith: The Daily News in 2008 ran an announcement congratulating Zuckerman on the birth of a daughter but made no mention of the child’s mother, prompting head-scratching in New York media circles. Recent visitors to his apartment said a baby is often present but that it’s considered impolite to inquire about the baby’s provenance. The story as we’ve heard it is that with daughter Abigail’s history of cancer, Mort wanted to ensure that he’d have someone to leave his vast fortune to. And so, in early 2008, he paid a surrogate to carry his second child. Hence: no mom. (Smith also makes passing reference to Mort’s “unconventional personal life” in his story. While it’s true that we should be suspicious of any man who publicly “dated” Arianna Huffington, we have no reason to suspect that he’s a closet homosexual, which is what that sort of euphemism usually means. On the other hand, we really don’t know shit about his affairs since the Murdoch cease-fire, as this mysterious baby business demonstrates.) Business In the early 1960s, Harvard Law grad Mort Zuckerman went to work at Cabot, Cabot & Forbes, the ancient Boston real estate development firm. After seven years, he left to start his own company, Boston Properties, and promptly sued Cabot, Cabot and Forbes. In 1980, Zuckerman bought The Atlantic. This was the millionaire real estate developers first foray into serious media ownership. At the time, some old-fashioned types thought he was buying the arts and letters publication for its historic Boston headquarters. Hah. He was buying it for influence. Millionaires with an interest in media are really good at attracting highbrow friends: He counts as friends such journalistic heavies as Writers Richard Goodwin and Doris Kearns and New Republic Editor and Publisher Martin Peretz. The same Time story quotes someone unnamed who had worked with Mort: “He’s very bright and very insecure, and has an overwhelming need for acceptance within a certain circle of society.” As Marty Peretz knows well enough, if you don’t have good enough ideas or a nice enough style to write for The New Republic or The Atlantic professionally, just buy the damn magazines and they have to print your garbage. In real estate, the ’80s were kind to Mort. He rode the boom and his connections with the Boston establishment helped him net some big projects. But in his attempt to develop a big piece of property at the edge of Central Park, this Jewish Canadian upstart from Boston went up against the Upper East Side elite, and lost. Monetarily, though, he continued doing well, right up until The Great Recession (he’d weathered each previous downturn just fine, oddly enough). He lost $25 million of his charitable trust fund and $15 million of his personal money to Bernie Madoff. Occupancy is down at his buildings. In 2009 he ripped the name Citigroup off the Citigroup building because he was tired of seeing his building in the b-roll on the news every time there was terrible news about Citi. (The news isn’t disastrous for Boston Properties, by any means—share prices have rebounded—but the way the commercial real estate market is looking, it could certainly become disastrous, soon.) His 2009 net worth was $1.5 billion —half what it was before the recession, but still a really unimaginable amount of money. He is, according to Forbes , the 236th richest person in America. Real estate pays the bills (and buys The Daily News full-color printers), but his true love remains media. The Atlantic just whet Mort’s appetite. He soon bought U.S. News & World Report , the perpetually third-place newsweekly, and installed himself as columnist and “editor in chief.” (Yes, right, we’ll get to that.) In 1993, he bought the Daily News. The News , at the time, was bankrupt. Now—well, it loses less money than The Post. He bought Fast Company and unloaded it in 2000 at the height of the boom, for $350 million. (“I averaged out,” he said.) Since selling Fast Company and The Atlantic (in 1999), though, the media business has not been friendly to Mort. He failed in his attempts to buy New York (twice), Newsday , and BusinessWeek . He teamed up with now-convicted felon Jeffrey Epstein to fund the much-missed Radar. U.S. News & World Report now theoretically comes out monthly (we say theoretically because no one has even seen a newstand copy in years) and exists primarily as yet one more venue for Mort’s endless political columns and for its annual list of colleges. Considering that Mort has made his career on what have turned out to be the two most disastrous industries in America, he may be seeking a government post just for a steady paycheck and a rock-solid pension plan. (Which would be more than he affords his Daily News employees—Mort killed pensions a while back and stopped contributing to their 401(k)s altogether last year). Politics Depending on who’s asking and and when, Mort is either a “longtime Democrat” or a “conservative Democrat” or a “moderate Conservative.” What he actually is is basically a rich New York Republican. He described his politics as “moderate, conservative” and said he had voted for President Bush in 1988, but he had been “extremely disappointed” with his performance as President. He’s donated more cash to Democrats than Republicans, especially since purchasing the (inconsistently) liberal populist Daily News. He voted for Obama. He also voted for Bush in 2004. He had a hard-on for toppling Saddam. You can’t really summarize his politics, because, by most conventional measures, they are incoherent—and he always tailors his message to his perceived audience. Wayne Barrett does a heroic job of of detailing just how incoherent Mort is on every issue of current import. With the president both blaming and vowing to tax the banks, Zuckerman seemed to agree partly, writing that “a good number of Americans are likely to remain furious at the spectacle of the financial world doing well while so many ordinary folks lose their jobs and their savings.” But the same day that story appeared, Fox asked him what he thought of Obama’s attacks on Wall Street “salaries and bonuses” and Mort rallied to the cause: “I don’t think it’s right to demonize these people. You just don’t diminish them and beat them over the heads and shoulders for political reasons. And that’s what it’s about.” Is this inconsistent? No, of course not: it is consistently what Serious Beltway Thinkers think. Consistency in thought can also be a challenge when you’re forced to say your own words, on TV, while having a full-time ghostwriter in charge of the words in print. He’s consistent on a couple issues, though—like Israel, which can do no wrong. He’s hawkish, pro-settler, and doesn’t actually really understand the issues involved beyond “Jews good, Arabs bad.” (Which can lead to embarrassing, uncorrected errors. ) That is not an unconventional opinion in New York politics, as you may have noticed. Generally, Mort fancies himself a public intellectual. His Lexington Ave office is like a massive library. It also houses the person who writes the words credited to the famous Public Intellectual Mort Zuckerman. Mort just calls in and rambles to this ghost for a while, and Harry Evans eventually edits it into something readable. (And sometimes it ends up in Tina Brown’s Daily Beast. ) He used to be described as an insecure lightweight who bought himself a platform. Planning a run for the Senate seems to suggest that a couple decades in the bubble have taken care of the insecurities. [Photo: AP]

Go here to read the rest:
The Story of Mort Zuckerman, Vanity Publisher and Would-be Senator [Field Guide]