Tag Archives: democratic

MSNBC Fill-In Host: Conservative Liberal Media Claims Based On Racism

Cenk Uygur, host of the left-wing internet talk show ‘The Young Turks,’ filled in for MSNBC host Dylan Ratigan during the 4PM ET hour on Wednesday and decried the nation’s “shift to the Right.” He lamented: “…when I started out I was a liberal Republican. No such thing exists anymore.” [Audio available here ] He wondered why the media hadn’t reported on the supposed radical shift in American politics and quickly came up with this explanation: “Why the media didn’t challenge it is because they [conservatives] kept calling them the liberal media, and why did they call them that? Because during civil rights, they [the media] said ‘yeah, black people and white people are the same’ and the conservatives at the time said ‘damn liberal media,’ and, you know, that intimidated the media into not recognizing this trend.” Uygur’s liberal guests, author Linda Monk and Wesleyen University professor Claire Potter did not disagree. In fact, Monk made sure to criticize President Eisenhower for his views on civil rights: “…let’s not be too celebratory of Eisenhower. He did stand up for the desegregation decisions. He did his job as president. But privately he was known for saying that racial desegregation was social disintegration, so he perhaps wasn’t as progressive on the race issue as some would interpret his actions to be.” Here is a transcript of the July 7 exchange: 4:43PM CENK UYGUR: And Claire, why do you think the spectrum has shifted so much, and another question is why is the media apparently not noticed it at all? CLAIRE POTTER [PROFESSOR, WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY]: Well, I think one of the things you have to look at is the context. A figure like Eisenhower, for example, was a politician during a period in which the Republicans and the Democrats had a horror of extremism. I think in the 15 or 20 years after World War II, there was a kind of centrist consensus that both extremes were to be avoided and that cooperation should be the norm. Now the only place that didn’t really work is race, until the Johnson administration. But for- LINDA MONK [AUTHOR, THE WORDS WE LIVE BY]: I think you’ve got McCarthy, though, coming along in the Eisenhower time, and certainly that was within the Republican Party, and that was a strong ideological bent, so I hear what you’re saying about there’s a concern about extremism, but certainly it had a place during the Republican Party at that time. POTTER: Sure. I mean, I don’t think you’re wrong about that, but I think one of the things that you see between 1948 and 1970 is a seismic shift in relation to who is a Democrat and who is a Republican. MONK: Right. POTTER: So that there is an enormous liberal block in the Republican Party the Democratic northern liberals are working with. MONK: Right. POTTER: And that southern Democrats, who are conservatives and can be brought along with a variety of Democratic initiatives, eventually moved to the Republican Party. MONK: Right. POTTER: Over desegregation and busing. UYGUR: Linda and Claire, I agree with both of you, and by the end of it, you know, I remember, even in my lifetime, when I started out I was a liberal Republican. No such thing exists anymore. POTTER: You and Nelson Rockefeller. UYGUR: Yeah. That’s wiped off the face of the earth, and so we see how – and part of the movement I think is because – and why the media didn’t challenge it – is because they kept calling them the liberal media, and why did they call them that? Because during civil rights, they said ‘yeah, black people and white people are the same’ and the conservatives at the time said ‘damn liberal media,’ and, you know, that intimidated the media into not recognizing this trend, I think. MONK: Well, and let’s not – let’s not be too celebratory of Eisenhower. He did stand up for the desegregation decisions. He did his job as president. But privately he was known for saying that racial desegregation was social disintegration, so he perhaps wasn’t as progressive on the race issue as some would interpret his actions to be. POTTER: Well- UYGUR: That’s a very fair point. We got to wrap it up right there. Linda and Claire, thank you, both of you, for joining us. Really appreciate it. MONK: Thanks, Cenk. POTTER: Thank you.

The rest is here:
MSNBC Fill-In Host: Conservative Liberal Media Claims Based On Racism

Sea Shepherd’s Anti-Whaling Activist, Peter Bethune, Sentenced in Japan

Anti-whaling activist receives probation and suspended sentence By the CNN Wire Staff July 7, 2010 4:53 a.m. EDT This undated handout obtained from the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society on February 16 shows Peter Bethune. * Japan (CNN) — Anti-whaling activist Peter Bethune was given a two-year suspended prison sentence and five years' probation Wednesday by a Tokyo district court judge for his role in boarding a Japanese whaling ship. Bethune was found guilty on five charges, ranging from assault against whalers to trespassing into a whaling vessel. Bethune had previously pleaded guilty to all charges but assault. He could have received up to 15 years behind bars on charges. Bethune testified during his trial in May that he had no intention of hurting anyone when he protested Japan's whale hunt. The New Zealand activist from the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society said that he believed the bottles of butyric acid he threw at the Shonan Maru 2 whaling ship were non-toxic and would not harm anyone. Prosecutors said the butyric acid burned two crew members of the Japanese whaling fleet, but Sea Shepherd called it a harmless, albeit rancid, liquid. Butyric acid is found in rancid butter and vomit. At the May hearing, he tearfully described the January collision between the Shonan Maru 2 and the Sea Shepherd's multi-million-dollar speedboat, the Ady Gil. The crash sunk the Ady Gil, which Bethune captained. Weeks later, Bethune jumped aboard the Shonan Maru 2 and attempted to make a citizen's arrest of the captain. He was arrested and brought back to Japan to face criminal charges. “I admit that I boarded the Shonan Maru, but I believe that I have good reason to do so,” he said. “I admit that I fired the butyric acid.” Bethune's case is the first time a Sea Shepherd activist has been tried in a Japanese criminal court in the group's long-running battle with Japan's whalers in the icy waters of the Antarctic. “It's encouraged us. It's certainly motivated us, and we're going back to the Southern Ocean with far more support than ever,” said Paul Watson, Sea Shepherd founder. “I hope that we'll be much more effective because of it.” “Pete Bethune is a hero in New Zealand,” Watson added. “He's a hero worldwide to people who want to see the end of whaling.” Japan annually hunts whales in the Antarctic, despite a worldwide moratorium on whaling, under the loophole that a country may legally do so if its purpose is scientific research. Sea Shepherd has claimed the science argument is a sham, noting that the whale meat then gets sold in Japanese markets and served in restaurants. “They're targeting endangered whales in an established international whale sanctuary in violation of the Antarctic treaty,” Watson said. “They're criminals.” CNN's Junko Ogura contributed to this report. added by: EthicalVegan

Lebron James joined Twitter, guess who he pissed off

King James Baby. link: http://www.bite.ca/bitedaily/2010/07/lebron-james-joined-twitter-guess-who-he-pi… added by: romanswietlik

Congressional Candidate Will McVay’s Primary Filing Announcement

7/6/2010 Will McVay’s announces his filing for the Democratic and Republican primaries in the 32nd Delaware State Representative District. Help the libertarians, vote for Will McVay! He’ll fight to stop the wars, to stop the spending, to guarantee individual rights and personal Freedom. http://www.peacefreedomprosperity.com/?p=3672 added by: shanklinmike

WaPo for Macaca: ‘Democrats Digging Harder Than Ever for Dirt on Republicans’

“The Democratic Party is moving faster and more aggressively than in previous election years to dig up unflattering details about Republican challengers. In House races from New Jersey to Ohio to California, Democratic operatives are seizing on evidence of GOP candidates’ unpaid income taxes, property tax breaks and ties to financial firms that received taxpayer bailout money.” So began a Washington Post article published Wednesday with the provocative title, “Democrats Digging Harder Than Ever for Dirt on Republicans.” As one reads Philip Rucker’s piece , you can almost feel the entire Post staff wishing for Democrats to produce a “macaca” moment that just might save them from a devastating defeat in the upcoming midterm elections: In recent weeks, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee has circulated information to local reporters about Republican candidates in close races. Among the claims: — That Jim Renacci of Ohio once owed nearly $1.4 million in unpaid state taxes. — That David Harmer of California received $160,000 in bonus and severance pay from a firm that got a federal bailout. — That Jon Runyan of New Jersey got a legal break in property taxes for his 25-acre homestead by qualifying for a farmland assessment thanks to his four donkeys.  To paraphrase Samuel Beckett, the Post appears to be waiting for macaca: Democratic officials are advising campaigns to hire trackers to follow their Republican opponents to public events with video cameras, ready to catch any gaffe or misstatement. And the Democratic National Committee last week issued a call to the public to submit any embarrassing audio or video of Republicans, as well as copies of their direct-mail advertisements. Readers should notice that nowhere in this piece was anything about Republicans trying to dig up dirt on Democrats, or any implication that such dirt exists. Also absent was any criticism concerning this strategy. Instead, the Post seemed to be applauding it while hoping it worked: Some years you ride the wave, and other years you paddle your canoe,” Democratic strategist Paul Begala said. “Democrats, they’ve got to paddle like hell. So what you do when you’re paddling is, as the Republicans seek to nationalize, you localize and personalize.” Localize and personalize. I guess the Post feels personalize is just fine when Democrats are doing it. Would it be so if Republicans were manning the oars? Somehow one imagines the picture would be painted with the GOP in that proverbial brown-colored creek: their efforts would be depicted as macaca without the ma.  

Read this article:
WaPo for Macaca: ‘Democrats Digging Harder Than Ever for Dirt on Republicans’

Local CBS Staff Join Hollywood Celebs in ‘The Dream Lives On’ Boston Pops Tribute to Kennedys

Less than an hour before CBS’s Craig Ferguson-hosted 10 PM EDT “ Boston Pops Fourth of July Fireworks Spectacular” national broadcast on Sunday night, local anchors Jack Williams and Lisa Hughes from Boston’s CBS-owned television station , along with a couple of local actors, took to the stage to narrate the music-accompanied “The Dream Lives On: A Portrait of the Kennedy Brothers.” ( Video: downloadable from NB twenty second wmv clip of Williams and Hughes in action.) Introducing the 20-minute production carried by WBZ-TV channel 4 in Boston in its 8-10 PM EDT coverage, Pops conductor Keith Lockhart ludicrously insisted it was “not political” — even though it takes its name from Ted Kennedy’s very political 2008 Democratic convention speech aimed at motivating Democrats to push for left-wing policies, starting with nationalized health care, and culminates by quoting the call to arms in that address: “If we set our compass true, we will reach our destination. The work begins anew, the hope rises again and the dream lives on!” That line was read by actor Morgan Freeman Jr. in the original May 18 production at Boston’s Symphony Hall ( mov video excerpt ) and coinciding with the concert at Boston’s Hatch Shell along the Charles River, the Pops trumpeted : On July 4, the Boston Pops will release a CD featuring the live recording of the world premiere performances of “The Dream Lives On: A Portrait of the Kennedy Brothers,” which took place at Symphony Hall May 18 & 19 with guest narrators Robert DeNiro, Morgan Freeman, Ed Harris, and Cherry Jones… In liner notes for the CD (PDF) , composer Peter Boyer expressed a “deep admiration for the Kennedys” and related: [I]t was not until I began to research his life for this project that I became more fully aware of the remarkable scope of his legislative achievements , over more than four decades. For me, the most inspiring aspects of the Kennedy brothers’ legacy are a commitment to idealism, and a sense of enduring optimism for our nation and for mankind. Thus the title of the work, The Dream Lives On, is taken from one of Ted Kennedy’s last public speeches, at the Democratic National Convention in 2008. My May 16 NewsBusters post, “ Leading Actors Lend Their Voices to Boston Pops’ Tribute to the Kennedy Brothers, ” described: A production which “combines quotes from speeches by the Kennedy brothers with original text and video, accompanied by a dramatic orchestral and choral score” so it “pays tribute to the towering achievements and singular spirit epitomized by the Kennedy brothers – the call to public service, drive for social change, and the legacy of optimism for America’s future.”… A promotional video features “Tony Award-winning lyricist Lynn Ahrens” relating the lyrics she created for the concert: Now on the rain-slicked streets of Boston and across the wind-swept Cape Code sea, over the din of Washington’s halls and down the halls of history, their passionate words can still be heard, their highest ideals a clarion call; these three American brothers inspiring the best in us all. More celebrity performances are to come: Actor Alec Baldwin will take the lead for a July 18 performance at Tanglewood and actor Chris Cooper will narrate a Hyannis Village Green event on August 1.

See the original post here:
Local CBS Staff Join Hollywood Celebs in ‘The Dream Lives On’ Boston Pops Tribute to Kennedys

USA Today Spins Liberal Lincoln Chafee as a ‘Centrist’ and a ‘Moderate’

According to USA Today’s Susan Page, Lincoln Chafee, a Republican who left the party and voted for Barack Obama in 2008, is simply a “moderate.” A cover story for Tuesday’s edition of the paper features the misleading sub-headline: ” Centrists Fuel Big Crop of Contenders This Year. ” Nowhere in the 1800 word piece does Page describe Chafee as a liberal. Instead, Chafee, now running for governor of Rhode Island as an independent, is part of a “rebellion in the middle.” Page sympathetically described the politician’s exit from the Republican Party after losing his 2006 reelection bid: “Chafee felt rejected by the GOP, which no longer seemed willing to include moderate Republicans like himself.” Of course, Chafee’s lifetime American Conservative Union score was a meager 34. (To repeat, this was when he was a Republican.) Such a number put him to the left of Democrats such as Ben Nelson and only slightly less liberal than Robert Byrd. Yet, Page touted Chafee not as a liberal, but as a truth teller: He may be testing voters’ appetite for honesty: In his announcement speech, he suggested addressing the state’s daunting budget gap by levying a 1% sales tax on food, clothing, over-the-counter drugs and other items now exempt from the state’s 7% sales tax. In a six-way debate on WPRI-TV in June — among two Democratic candidates, two Republicans and two independents — Chafee’s tax proposal was the first question raised by moderator Tim White and the prime target of attack. “He wants to raise taxes and I want to cut spending,” Democrat Frank Caprio, the state treasurer and Chafee’s leading competitor, said after the debate when asked about his strategy. “That’s the difference between us.” Consider the facts here: The Democratic candidate is attacking Chafee for lobbying to raise taxes. Shouldn’t that be enough for Page to describe Chafee as a liberal? Later, Page returned to the concept of raising taxes as simple honesty: Chafee acknowledges that suggesting the tax hike is a calculated risk. He’s counting on voters to reward a straightforward discussion of the options ahead. If they don’t, he says, the fault will be his own failure to communicate and convince them. The USA journalist also touted other party switchers as examples of moderation: “There are more signs of centrists stirring as national politics remain sharply polarized, a factor some candidates cite for leaving or being pushed from their old allegiances.”

Original post:
USA Today Spins Liberal Lincoln Chafee as a ‘Centrist’ and a ‘Moderate’

Gore story goes mainstream

The story of Al Gore’s alleged unwanted sexual advances toward a Portland, Ore., masseuse, which had been simmering since the National Enquirer first published the allegations last week, broke into the mainstream news cycle Friday after the Portland police announced they would reopen their investigation. Anderson Cooper did a segment on the story on CNN Thursday night. By Friday, it was all over network television newscasts, while the Oregonian had a front-page mea culpa by the Portland police chief saying his department had mishandled the investigation when it first surfaced in 2006. The story’s jump from the fringe to the mainstream compounds the problems for Gore, whose family spokesman, Kalee Kreider, has said that Gore “unequivocally and emphatically” denied making unwanted sexual advances. “Further investigation into this matter will only benefit Mr. Gore.” It also brought up by-now-familiar accusations of the media’s complicity in covering up the scandal when it first surfaced. The Portland Tribune, which was looking into the story in 2007 and 2008, has taken some heat for its decision not to go forward with the story. In a piece titled “Al Gore and the Media Protection Racket,” The American Spectator’s Jeffrey Lord argued that the existence of a police report involving the former vice president was news in itself, and the Tribune should have reported it as such. For the Spectator, it was d

Network Morning Shows Laud the Comedy of ‘Lively,’ SNL-worthy Kagan

All three morning shows on Wednesday made sure to tout the “lively” sense of humor of Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan, this as ABC continued to ignore the hearings. Over two days, Good Morning America has devoted a scant 67 seconds to Barack Obama’s nominee. After a news brief featuring Kagan cracking jokes at her hearings, former Democratic operative George Stephanopoulos gushed, “… If this Supreme Court thing doesn’t work out, she’s got another career in stand-up .” [Audio available here .]  Guest host Elizabeth Vargas hyperbolically asserted that Saturday Night Live couldn’t “be as funny as Elena Kagan was!” Today’s Kelly O’Donnell prefaced clips of Kagan’s humor by fawning, “But the real surprise has been that both Democrats and Republicans found something to smile about.” She added, “And there were actually a number of other of those kinds of personable, humorous exchanges and maybe some of that came out because it was such a grind, more than 10 hours.” Over on CBS’s Early Show, reporter Jan Crawford warned that “aggressive” Republicans were on the “attack.” She observed, “But Kagan was blunt and didn’t hide her background.” Crawford, too, highlighted Kagan’s comedy: “And while the day was dominated by tough questions, there were moments of levity.” The journalist enthused, “On one point, both sides agreed.” She then played a clip of Senator Arlen Specter touting the nominee’s “admirable sense of humor.” Crawford did note that Kagan wasn’t entirely forthcoming. Referencing the fact that the potential judge has previously called such hearings a charade, the reporter concluded, “…So she really did that dance that we’ve seen from nominees year after year after year up here.” Due to the almost non-existent nature of ABC’s coverage, the program skipped any mention of Kagan’s testimony on Don’t Ask/Don’t Tell. The Early Show reported her statement of opposition to it. Today’s O’Donnell featured this exchange: KELLY O’DONNELL: In the most intense exchange, the committee’s top Republican, Jeff Sessions, pounded Kagan for restricting where on campus where the military could recruit when she was dean at Harvard Law. SEN. JEFF SESSIONS: You were punishing the military. O’DONNELL: Kagan insisted recruiters had access to students. She said the military ban on gays serving openly conflicted with Harvard’s anti-discrimination policy. KAGAN: I have repeatedly said that I believe that the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell policy is unwise and unjust. I believed it then and I believe it now. SESSIONS: I know you were an outspoken leader against the military policy. For a recap of Tuesday’s morning show coverage of Kagan, see an earlier NewsBusters post. A transcript of ABC’s brief segment, which aired at 7:14am, follows: JUJU CHANG: Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan faces what is likely her final round of questioning from senators today. Her first day of confirmation testimony was long and, at times, tense. But, Kagan proves she has a lively sense of humor. SENATOR LINDSEY GRAHAM: Where are you at on Christmas day? ELENA KAGAN: You know, like all Jews, I was probably in a Chinese restaurant. SENATOR ARLEN SPECTER: You’ve already said you’re in favor of televising the court. KAGAN: It means I would have to get my hair done more often, Senator Specter. SENATOR ORRIN HATCH: We have to have a back and forth every once in a while. Or this place would be boring as hell, I’ll tell you. KAGAN: And it gets the spotlight off me. CHANG [Laughs]: That’s the news at 7:15. Excellent ad-libs. But the real question, George and Elizabeth, is who is going to play her in the SNL skit? ELIZABETH VARGAS: Oh, it’s ripe for it, isn’t it? Although, I don’t think they could be as funny as Elena Kagan was! GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: Yeah, if this Supreme Court thing doesn’t work out, she’s got another career in stand-up. VARGAS: Absolutely.

See the rest here:
Network Morning Shows Laud the Comedy of ‘Lively,’ SNL-worthy Kagan

Open Thread: The 2nd Amendment as a Civil Rights Issue

Yesterday’s landmark Supreme Court decision overturning the blanket handgun ban in Chicago continues the legacy of the civil rights movement, some commentators argue . Within the text of the 214-page Supreme Court ruling on gun rights is a history lesson on how Americans’ right to keep and bear arms was a major issue in the struggle for black civil rights in the South after the Civil War. To wit, Southern resisters, black codes and lawless lawmen attempted to disarm freedmen (usually in order to make them more vulnerable to racist terrorism), and the federal government came to their rescue by protecting their 2nd Amendment rights. The quotations and detailed references leave absolutely no question that Congress and the ratifiers of the 14th Amendment viewed it — and accompanying post-war civil rights legislation — as a safeguard against state infringement of the 2nd Amendment right of the people to keep and bear arms. It’s not a part of our history that the Left has much stomach for, but fewer people argue against the obvious now that the Democratic Party has all but conceded the gun issue. What do you think? Is gun control a civil rights issue, or is this blogger muddying the waters? Follow the link above for a more complete history lesson.

See original here:
Open Thread: The 2nd Amendment as a Civil Rights Issue