Tag Archives: democrats

Maddow Guest Harris-Lacewell Suggests ‘Crazy Uncle’ Biden Spout Off and Obama Pretend to Disagree

Hope and change, meet business as usual. Princeton professor Melissa Harris-Lacewell unveiled this curious possible strategy for Democrats heading into the midterms when she appeared on Rachel Maddow’s MSNBC show Sept. 8 — MADDOW: One last last question on the specifics here. The president himself is planning to be very visible from all accounts, multiple campaign events, the first planned press conference in a long while. Is he still the Democrats’ best campaign asset or do Democrats need somebody else out there who can throw sharper barbs than a sitting president is really allowed to? Followed by Harris-Lacewell responding, as if hearing the question from Maddow for the first time — HARRIS-LACEWELL: You know, look, I love to see President Obama out there. He loves giving the speeches, he’s a great campaigner, we know that. But I have to say, one of the reasons I was a big supporter of Joe Biden for the vice presidential position is because I always thought that Biden could provide a real asset in a moment like this. Look, don’t get me wrong but Joe Biden has a sort of a reputation for being Crazy Joe and one of the best things about your crazy uncle at a family reunion is that he says the one completely honest thing that everybody’s thinking, that none of the people with an actual filter will in fact say. So, I’m a big fan of kind of deploying the Crazy Uncle Joe strategy. Send Vice President Biden out there, let him kind of get tough, let him say things that are somewhat outrageous and then, you know, let President Obama do his typical strategy of reaching across the aisle and, you know, he’ll look and say oh come on, Joe, that may have gone too far. But I’m a big fan of, let’s get Crazy Joe out there. MADDOW (beaming with approval, as if for the first time she’s heard this): The Crazy Uncle Joe strategy, TM, Melissa Harris-Lacewell. HARRIS-LACEWELL: Why not?! (laughs) MADDOW: Very good. I want the T-shirt franchise on that! What the heck, Harris-Lacewell guffaws, oblivious to the inherent dishonesty of her suggestion. Correct me if I’m wrong, but wasn’t this the sort of thing Obama vowed to campaign against , back when a grasping, credulous portion of the electorate considered him an agent of genuine change?  In other words, Biden could act as ventriloquist dummy, saying what Obama seemingly can’t but actually is. Why not? (slap knee here) No one will see through that.

See original here:
Maddow Guest Harris-Lacewell Suggests ‘Crazy Uncle’ Biden Spout Off and Obama Pretend to Disagree

Conservative Funders Furious Over New Yorker Hit Piece

Conservative businessman David Koch told Elaine Lafferty of  The Daily Beast that a recent hit piece in The New Yorker has him steaming. “It’s hateful. It’s ludicrous. And it’s plain wrong.” The object of his ire is a 9,963 word story in The New Yorker magazine, published last week which accuses David, his brother Charles, and Koch Industries of…well, just about everything: Secretly funding the Tea Party movement, secretly manipulating the Smithsonian, along with, not-so-secretly polluting the planet, stealing oil from Native American land, denying the existence of climate change, and promoting carcinogens — all in the self-interest of making further billions. The title of Jane Mayer’s story is “Covert Operations.” That upsets Koch: “If what I and my brother believe in, and advocate for, is secret, it’s the worst covert operation in history,” Koch says, in reference to the New Yorker headline, adding that a lengthy letter to the magazine, rebutting nearly every allegation in the story is in the works… The origins of “the Billionaire who Secretly Funds the Tea Party” narrative seems to be his connection to Americans for Prosperity, an organization he founded six years ago, whose message is indeed aligned with the Tea Party movement’s message of less tax and more-efficient government. But, he says, no one from the Tea Party movement has ever approached him for money, and when I ask him straight up if he’s funding the Tea Party, all he says is, “Oh, please .” But despite being demonized by liberal magazines and the Obama White House, David Koch isn’t uniformly conservative in his political donations: While they have been politically active for more than 30 years, largely funding Republicans, they have never been identified with conservatives on hot-button issues such as gay marriage or abortion. He and his wife Julia have contributed $74,900 to New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo’s Democratic campaign for governor, according to Ira Stoll at www.FutureofCapitalism.com. Politico.com reported that KochPac has contributed $196,000 to Democrats in the 2010 election cycle alone, including $30,000 to the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee. Lafferty noted that none these accusations — “covertly supporting the Tea Party movement, polluting the planet, stealing oil and being a climate-change denier” — bother him as much as the suggestion that his position as a member of the National Cancer Advisory Board, an arm of the National Cancer Institute, presents a “conflict of interest” because Koch Industries has lobbied against the classification of formaldehyde as a carcinogen. Koch has struggled with prostate cancer for 20 years. A statement the Koch brothers put out included these paragraphs: We provided the New Yorker with a tremendous amount of information in hopes it would enable the publication to produce a balanced and accurate portrayal of our company. Unfortunately, that information was largely omitted or ignored, resulting in inaccuracies and misstatements. A catalog of all these errors would take up more space than the article itself. For a more accurate review of the issues, please go to www.kochfacts.com … Unfortunately, some of those who disagree with a market-based point of view continue to try to demonize the Kochs’ 40 years of unwavering, well-known, lawful and principled commitment to economic freedom and market-based policy solutions. The Kochs have steadfastly supported the benefits of economic freedom, the importance of the rule of law, private property rights, the proper and limited role of government in society and warned against the perils of excessive government spending. We see escalating efforts to discount and mischaracterize important and authentic citizen efforts, as well as dismiss and degrade our support of education and human services programs. The New Yorker article, and those pieces that have echoed it, rely heavily on innuendo and unsubstantiated assertions. Unnamed sources and those with a strong philosophical opposition to the Kochs – many of whom have no current or first-hand knowledge of Koch Industries, Charles Koch or David Koch – go unchallenged. Supporters of the Kochs are largely ignored (as evidenced by the fact that the reporter chose not to include the vast majority of supportive comments made by a number of people who know the Kochs and were interviewed for this article). On the other hand, those who support the reporter’s preconceptions are given a free pass.

Visit link:
Conservative Funders Furious Over New Yorker Hit Piece

Obama Press Secretary Gibbs Uses Twitter to Push NYT Hit Piece About Boehner

The midterm election campaign is now in full swing, and with Democrats looking at historic losses in Congress, the folks at the New York Times did their job by publishing a front page hit piece on House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Oh.) Sunday: He maintains especially tight ties with a circle of lobbyists and former aides representing some of the nation’s biggest businesses, including Goldman Sachs, Google, Citigroup, R. J. Reynolds, MillerCoors and UPS. They have contributed hundreds of thousands of dollars to his campaigns, provided him with rides on their corporate jets, socialized with him at luxury golf resorts and waterfront bashes and are now leading fund-raising efforts for his Boehner for Speaker campaign, which is soliciting checks of up to $37,800 each, the maximum allowed. The woman he hopes to replace, Speaker Nancy Pelosi, derided him on Friday as having met “countless times with special-interest lobbyists in an effort to stop tough legislation” that would regulate corporations and protect consumers. And the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, through a spokeswoman, charged that he “epitomizes the smoked-filled, backroom, special-interest deal making that turns off voters about Washington.” So marvelous a hit job was done by Eric Lipton that Obama’s Press Secretary Robert Gibbs sent four consecutive messages on Sunday to his 93,000 followers on Twitter: Politico’s Mike Allen decided to “retweet” one of Gibb’s messages to his 36,000 followers : Allen followed this with a tweet of his own concerning Boehner: Gibbs must have liked that and retweeted it himself:    So, you can see how this campaign is going to work now:  The White House, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), and/or Senate Majority Harry Reid (D-Nev.) will send their talking points to “news” outlets like the Times “News” outlets like the Times will dutifully echo such talking points The White House, Pelosi, and/Reid will broadcast the “news” to all that are interested “News” outlets like the Times will dutifully echo such broadcasts.    This is the state of “journalism” in America today. Any questions?

Follow this link:
Obama Press Secretary Gibbs Uses Twitter to Push NYT Hit Piece About Boehner

NYT’s Herbert: Obama and Dems Created Mess But GOP Would Be Worse

You can’t swing a dead cat these days without hitting some pathetically liberal media member claiming that despite how bad things are now they’d get worse if Republicans won in November. Exhibit A: New York Times columnist Bob Herbert’s article Saturday. In it, he somewhat honestly told his readers about the misshaps of the President he personally helped get elected. Fair enough, but the conclusion – almost like a talking points memo from the very Party he unashamedly supports! – was that things would get a lot worse if Republicans took back Congress: People feel that the country is going to hell, that the system itself has broken down, and President Obama and the Democrats have been unable to assuage that awful feeling. The Democrats are in deep, deep trouble because they have not effectively addressed the overwhelming concern of working men and women: an economy that is too weak to provide the jobs they need to support themselves and their families. With the nation losing hundreds of thousands of jobs a month in early-2009, the president and his allies in Congress could have rallied the citizenry to participate in the difficult work of nation-building here at home. He could have called on everyone to share in the sacrifices that needed to be made, and he could have demanded much more from the financial and corporate elites who were being bailed out with the people’s money. Makes sense, right? Just wait: The Democrats are facing an election debacle because they did not respond adequately to their constituents’ most dire needs. The thing that is really weird is that a strengthened G.O.P. will undoubtedly make matters so much worse. Really? The unemployment rate was 4.6 percent when the Democrats took control of Congress in January 2007. It’s now 9.6 percent. Over 7 million Americans have lost their jobs since the Democrats took over Congress. 7 million! And shills like Herbert have the gall to claim conditions would worsen if Republicans were back in power. Hey Mr. Herbert: how about proving your point with actual data rather than inflammatory rhetoric? I know, I know – that would be too much like journalism for a shill like this.

Read the original:
NYT’s Herbert: Obama and Dems Created Mess But GOP Would Be Worse

Toast of the London Stage: Play With Laura Bush Reading to Dead Iraqi Children

George W. Bush may be almost two years removed from his White House tenure, but the haters are still at work. Gay Marxist playwright Tony Kushner is the toast of London theatre right now for his series of five small plays called “Tiny Kushner.” Included in the set is a reprise of his piece titled “Only We Who Guard the Mystery Shall Be Unhappy,” featuring Laura Bush reading Dostoyevsky to the ghosts of dead Iraqi children. (Byron York offered enough of a summary here .) In an interview with the leftist U.K. Guardian newspaper, Kushner demonstrated his hatred is undiminished: “I wrote it after I was arrested at the big anti-invasion rally outside the United Nations in 2003,” he says. “I left feeling immensely depressed because I knew we had left it too late to make a difference. And then a couple of days later, Bush said that he was grateful to us, because we had offered him a ‘focus group’ . I hate that motherf—er , but for once the man incapable of using the English language had hit on something apt: that’s what the progressive left in America was reduced to, a focus group.” By contrast, Kushner expressed patience with Barack Obama, even as he proclaimed that the insights of Karl Marx are proven in America daily: ” Marxism is alive ,” he says. “What happened under Stalin was horrendous, but in point of fact, Marx never really worked out a solution, it was not his doing. But he was an absolutely astonishing reader of history, and of class. His analysis of capitalism is being proved in America every day .” It takes a confident man to say such a thing in public in America, even today. And Kushner has become confident enough to blow his own horn. His latest stand is a refusal to go along with the disillusionment in Barack Obama; instead, he accuses his Democrat detractors of political narcissism. It is a bit surprising to hear Kushner declare himself “very happy” with Obama’s efforts. “The left is shooting itself in the foot,” he argues. “I don’t want to sound contemptuous, but there is a tendency to see politics as an expression of your own personal purity, a character test. It’s not. It’s about learning to advance a progressive agenda by under-standing the working of a democracy.” That pragmatic understanding is, after all, what got Obama elected. The thought that makes Kushner angry – and makes him talk even faster, more urgently – is of his “community” damaging the Democrats’ chances of fending off a rightwing resurrection in the form of Sarah Palin, or worse. That might send gay rights, his core issue, back to the Reagan era. Ambivalence isn’t really in Kushner’s toolbox when it comes to conservative leaders. Kushner told another interviewer (for the U.K. Prospect magazine ) about the Laura Bush piece: “I’ve always thought of it as a struggle between two characters for developing an internal tolerance of ambivalence. People who don’t have it, like George W. Bush, are very dangerous people.” That interviewer, John Nathan, praised him as a prophet, including how “Kushner’s first play A Bright Room Called Day (1984) made a comparison between Reagan and Hitler (he once told me he was being deliberately irresponsible)—and then what happens? The morning after the play opened, the papers carried pictures of Reagan in Germany placing a wreath at the graves of SS soldiers.” Nathan added that Kushner’s next project “is what he once described to me as his ‘next big gay play,'” titled  The Intelligent Homosexual’s Guide To Capitalism and Socialism With A Key To The Scriptures. The Guardian’s review delighted in the Laura Bush play as the best part of “Tiny Kushner,” which “reveals his gift for blending the hallucinatory and the political…even here Kushner’s polemical fury at the Iraq invasion is qualified by his residual sympathy for Mrs Bush. Having mouthed the conventional platitudes in defence of the war, she is shocked into a guilty awareness, telling the imagined children ‘we will pay for your deaths one way or another’.” Ian Shuttleworth in the Financial Times raved: “The strongest piece of all is Only We Who Guard The Mystery Shall Be Unhappy , in which First Lady Laura Bush in her literacy-campaigner guise prepares to read Dostoevsky’s Grand Inquisitor episode to the ghosts of dead Iraqi children. As is typical of Kushner at his best, the piece’s attitudes may be obvious but their expression is richly complex and insightful.” Brent Bozell had a different take on Kushner’s work Angels in America : “the theatrical version of one of those crazy letters to the editor that never end and have too many capital letters.”

See more here:
Toast of the London Stage: Play With Laura Bush Reading to Dead Iraqi Children

Libertarians issue warning to Tea Partiers

Looking toward the 9/12 Tea Party events in Washington, DC, Libertarian Party executive director Wes Benedict issued the following warning to Tea Partiers: “Republicans are trying to fool you again.” “There are two kinds of Tea Partiers,” said Benedict. “One kind is so blinded by its hatred of Obama and Democrats that it cannot see fault with Republicans. It's the other kind the Libertarian Party is reaching out to.” Libertarian Party staff and volunteers will participate in the Washington, DC Tea Party events on September 12. They will distribute flyers pointing out how the Top 10 Disasters of the 2009-2010 Obama administration mirror the Top 10 Disasters of the 2001-2008 Bush administration. Benedict continued, “Libertarians have much in common with Tea Party goals of reducing government spending and taxes. While many Tea Party supporters will admit that George W. Bush's administration grew government, Libertarians want to remind Tea Partiers about previous Republican administrations that loved big government. “Republican Newt Gingrich and the Contract with America promised to eliminate the Departments of Education and Energy. Yet once Republicans took control of Congress, they failed even to reduce the spending on those departments. “Republican President George Bush, Sr. remains famous for coining the phrase 'Read my lips, no new taxes,' and then raising taxes. “Republican President Ronald Reagan grew federal government spending to the highest level it had reached since World War II. He also 'saved Social Security' by raising payroll taxes. “Republican presidential candidate Bob Dole was a huge supporter of taxpayer subsidies for corn and ethanol. “In 1971, Republican President Richard Nixon instituted wage and price controls. That made a group of free-market supporters so angry that they decided to form the Libertarian Party. “Republicans seem to think we're idiots. For decades they have paid lip-service to shrinking government, while consistently doing the opposite in office. “Our fear is that Tea Partiers might say 'This time it will be different.' No it won't. If you vote for Republicans this time, it will just reinforce the message that they can lie to you and grow government with impunity. “Current Republicans are just as bad as past Republicans. “This year, Libertarian Party co-founder David Nolan is running for U.S. Senate against Republican John McCain, who famously suspended his 2008 presidential campaign so he could rush back to Washington to bail out the banks. “Republican leader John Boehner might end up as the next House Speaker, and he voted for George W. Bush's huge 2003 Medicare expansion. “John Cornyn, Republican senator from Texas, and current chairman of the National Republican Senatorial Committee, voted for the TARP bailouts. “Ron Paul is probably the only Republican congressman willing to point out the huge cost of America's foreign wars and empire building. Other Republicans pretend that spending trillions on the military just doesn't count as big government. “With Social Security, Medicare, and military spending making up the vast majority of federal spending, you can't cut significantly without cutting those. But Republicans refuse to touch them. “Libertarians welcome the Tea Party movement's focus on the problem of government growth. However, we are concerned that Tea Partiers might fall for the Republicans' trickery. “Republican leaders have brought up distractions like New York City mosques and gay marriage to distract voters from Republicans' big-government track record. We hope that Tea Partiers will see through the smoke and mirrors. “While our nation is declining dangerously right now, a turnaround could be straightforward and simple with Libertarian steps like these: 1. Bring our troops home from Iraq and Afghanistan; 2. Stop rewarding failed companies with bailouts; 3. Cut taxes and spending and let the free market work. “The Libertarian Party is fielding 168 candidates for U.S. House, and 20 candidates for U.S. Senate this year. Win or lose, a vote for a Libertarian sends a clear message for smaller government and more freedom. What message does a vote for John McCain send?” For more information, or to arrange an interview, call LP Executive Director Wes Benedict at 202-333-0008 ext. 222. The LP is America's third-largest political party, founded in 1971. The Libertarian Party stands for free markets and civil liberties. http://www.lp.org/news/press-releases/libertarians-issue-warning-to-tea-partiers added by: shanklinmike

Was Obama’s Choice to Pass on Climate a "Blunder of Historic Proportions"?

Photo via NY Mag Earlier in the week, I looked at a hypothetical scenario laid out by columnist David Brooks in which he imagined Obama and the Democrats had gone forward with an energy bill instead of doing health care reform. Joe Romm of Climate Progress had looked at the same scenario, and commented in the end that “”Future ge… Read the full story on TreeHugger

See more here:
Was Obama’s Choice to Pass on Climate a "Blunder of Historic Proportions"?

Taranto: How the Press Looks Silly for Projecting ObamaCare Would Make GOP ‘Sore Losers’

James Taranto at the Wall Street Journal  pointed out in his “Best of the Web Today” review on Thursday how Mark Halperin of Time seems to disagree so vehemently with himself about how the Obama presidency was supposed to unfold this year. Why would Obama delay business-tax-cut talk until the fall, for example : It is fair to ask (and many Democrats have) why the President is only now proposing such critical measures, rather than offering them up earlier in his term, before election-season politics brought governing to a standstill. It’s fair to answer, too. While Americans were anxious about the economy, Obama was obsessed with wrecking our health care. He was urged on by cheerleaders in the media like the one who wrote an article on March 22, the day after the House passed ObamaCare, which began as follows: In the 7½ months between now and November’s midterm elections, millions of Americans will be whipped into a frenzy over the purported evils in the Democrats’ health care bill, egged on by Fox News chatter, Rush Limbaugh’s daily sermons, threats of state legislative and judicial action and the solemn pledge of Republicans in Washington to make the fall election a referendum on Obamacare. But in doing so, they may be playing right into the Democrats’ hands. The author of that paragraph: Time magazine’s Mark Halperin . It would be unsporting to dwell on Halperin’s lack of prescience. After all, anyone who makes political predictions is going to get it wrong sometimes. But in his March 22 piece, Halperin went beyond prognostication: Democrats will be joined in the fray by much of the press. For Republicans, this will seem like familiar ground, since generations of conservatives have complained that the so-called mainstream media have been biased against them. Well, get ready, Republicans, for déjà vu all over again. The coverage through November likely will highlight the most extreme attacks on the President and his law and spotlight stories of real Americans whose lives have been improved by access to health care (pushed, no doubt, by Democrats from every competitive congressional district and state). The louder Republicans yell, the more they will be characterized and caricatured as sore losers infuriated by the first major delivery of candidate Obama’s promise of “change.” The focus on the weekend’s alleged racial and gay-bashing verbal attacks by opponents of the Democrats’ plan should be a caution to Republican strategists trying to figure out how to manage the media this year. Halperin is a member of the press, and as the first paragraph of the March article makes clear, he was among the ObamaCare cheerleaders who, as he accurately observed, made up “much of the press.” Thus, that last excerpt is not just a prediction but a promise: Don’t worry, Mr. President, we in the press will propagandize relentlessly for you and turn this into a political winner. We think that was an unwise promise to make, not only because the press is supposed to be independent, but also because it was impossible to deliver the goods. The liberal media monopoly has long since been broken. Halperin and his colleagues were never going to be able to put lipstick on the ObamaCare pig by slandering opponents or producing puff pieces on “real Americans whose lives have been improved.” Yet having promised to do just that, Halperin isn’t even trying. Instead, he is chastising the president — for inexplicably following Halperin’s advice!

Read the original here:
Taranto: How the Press Looks Silly for Projecting ObamaCare Would Make GOP ‘Sore Losers’

Intelligent Gay’s Join the Tea Party! Welcomed by Most Conservatives

According to Chris Johnson of the Washington Blade, “The Tea Party is energizing the Republican Party base and ousting incumbent GOP lawmakers from Congress, focused on economic issues and limited government rather than anti-gay rhetoric in its bid for growth and acceptance.” A number of gay conservatives have abandoned their usual posts with Log Cabin Republican groups and decided that there is room for everyone in the Tea Party. Recently a convention called HomoCon, a group for gay conservatives touted that Ann Coulter would be headlining their event. This caused riffs with traditional Republicans who wish to exclude gays and lesbians from the Tea Party – organizations like WorldNetDaily, a dot com who attempts to harness the Tea Party movement and make it a members only affair. The picture that’s being painted here is one of anti-gay rhetoric being tossed into the vat of failed Republican Party politics and the Tea Party being a possible solution for gay conservatives who wish to have their voices heard. Indeed, at the National Equality March in October of 2009, there was a 150 foot banner held up by Tea Party Patriots which read “Teabaggers For Gay Rights”. One of the Patriots holding up her section of the banner appeared to be an African-American transgender woman. The term “teabaggers” was at first an accidental term that the Tea Party started using as a self-descriptor – until it was revealed that the word “teabagging” was already a slang term for “the dragging of one’s testicles (usually by an erotic dancer) across the forehead of an onlooker”. One cannot help but notice how many tea-related slang terms have vastly different meanings in gay culture. Some fiscally conservative gay rights supporters have humorously embraced these double entendres, like the group at the National Equality March. In the Washington Blade article, Johnson points out that Alaskan Senator Lisa Murkowski (R) supported inclusion of hate crime laws (like the Mathew Shepard Act) while her Palin-backed Tea Party opponent in the primary election did not. Murkowski was caught off guard by Palin's sudden support of the more conservative Miller. But here in Florida a transgender Tea Party candidate named Donna Milo, although she did not win either, scored a quarter of the Republican Primary vote in elections last month in a 3 way race. No transgender candidate was ever known to have run as a Republican for a congressional seat before and so earning that many votes in a primary is quite significant. Another example of open doors in the Tea Party movement for gays and lesbians is the fact that one of the most admired leaders among them – Fox News star Glenn Beck – has voiced some support for gay marriage. But ultimately – the Democratic Party, which has held the gay vote captive for many years is not going to let go of one of their key demographics very easily. Congress has an LGBT Equality Caucus now that is comprised of 81 Democrats and only one single Republican. That Republican is Illeana Ross-Lehtinen of Florida. While she has received some criticism for her participation in the Equality Caucus, she has also maintained a Republican presence in government where it ordinarily would not exist. Key liberal Democrats have been unwilling to attack Ross-Lehtinen and moved on to skewer other GOP party leaders. http://www.southfloridagaynews.com/news/139-politics/2071-is-there-a-gay-tea-par… added by: congoboy

Left Wing Nation Magazine: Schoolteachers ‘Exclude Progressive Ideas and Viewpoints’

The folks at the far-left Nation Magazine have finally figured out the problem that continues to plague the American education system: it’s dominated by right-wingers! Seriously. That’s what they think. Or at least what they’re claiming. A spokesman for the Nation whined to the Daily Caller’s Chris Moody about a supposed “tendency for classes to exclude progressive ideas and viewpoints.” Most people who have ever set foot in a classroom are now scratching their heads in confusion. Moody reported: “The real idea behind it is to bring the left perspective to issues to make sure students have both left and right available to them,” the Nation’s Vice President of Circulation Art Stupar told TheDC. “This is an opportunity for students to view what the progressive left thinks about a particular issue.” The liberal magazine sends online curriculum guides each week to teachers that include experts from the magazine, talking points about current events and suggested discussion topics for the classroom. The guides are a part of the magazine’s “learning packs,” which offer educators access to its archives dating back to shortly after the Civil War. “In this year of economic uncertainty and critical mid-term elections, the corporate-owned media will not be offering lessons about: our rigged political system; the conservative crusade against Muslims; the phony ‘panic’ over debt; vets abandoned by the VA; taxes and the Tea Party and much, much more,” read the magazine’s announcement for the new school year, which begins today for many students around the country. Let’s see. College professors give money to Democrats over Republicans by a greater than 7-1 margin . Ninety-six percent of teachers’ unions political contributions since 1990 have gone to Democrats. And this is the industry the Nation claims is suffering from a tragic deficit of leftist thought. Of course those numbers are not surprising to anyone who is, you know, paying attention. And those willing to acknowledge reality will not need to look at the NEA’s balance sheet to recognize the sheer absurdity of the premises underlying the Nation’s campaign. National Review publisher Jack Fowler, who called the Nation’s effort “laughable,” clearly has a firm grasp on reality. “We have no outreach to the three conservative professors that there are,” he told the DC.

Read more from the original source:
Left Wing Nation Magazine: Schoolteachers ‘Exclude Progressive Ideas and Viewpoints’