Tag Archives: editor

Five Disgusting Airline Meals (Photos)

Filed under: Niche Going , Websites , Food Marco ‘t Hart, the editor of AirlineMeals.net , collected more than 20,000 photos of in-flight meals from 600 airlines in every class, all of which were sent by travelers with a penchant for spotting the nastiest ” food .” Here are the five grossest “meals” he could find: ESTONIAN AIR from Tallinn to Copenhagen Starter Pictured: Rice, peas, corn, herring, potato salad, lettuce, tomato, bread, and a “stodgy, doughy dessert” AIR BOTSWANA from Johannesburg to Gaborone Pictured: “Meat something with vegetable something and fluorescent green soda” AEROFLOT from Moscow to Malta Pictured: Salmon ALITALIA from D Continue reading

Prophet Bear Porn? (NSFW)

This seems to look more like a Pedo Bear costume but reading the title on top of the image prophetizes another answer. Maybe Sasha Grey and the porn industry should be careful they don't end up with a bomb scare of their own. [ Editor's Note: Click on the image to see the full Prophet, I mean picture. ] View

Dead Man Embalmed On His Motorcycle

After his death, David Morales Col

Parking Jerk Learns Lesson

A rude driver learns a lesson in patience the hard way. [ Editor's PSA : Also, buy the car that this viral ad is for today!] Watch

Reuters Chief Shoots Down Story on Killing of His Own Staffers In Baghdad [Exclusive]

David Schlesinger , the editor in chief of Reuters, declined to run a story by one of his own reporters containing claims that the 2007 killings of two Reuters staffers in Baghdad by U.S. troops may have been war crimes. Reuters staffers Namir Noor-Eldeen and Saeed Chmagh were killed by U.S. helicopter gunships in Baghdad in 2007. Video of the attack, which shows the journalists standing next to unidentified armed men on a Baghdad street and records the destruction of a van attempting to retrieve a wounded Chmagh, was published this week by Wikileaks. The video has launched a debate about the legality of the attack, which also wounded two children ( you can read our take here ). Yesterday, Reuters’ deputy Brussels bureau chief Luke Baker filed a muscular story repeating allegations from several human rights and international law experts that the killings may have constituted war crimes. But Reuters chief David Schlesinger, a tipster says, spiked the story because “it needed more comment from the Pentagon and U.S. lawyers.” It never ran, but you can read it in full below. Reuters’ response to the disclosure of the video has been relatively muted. Schlesinger issued a statement on Tuesday calling the video “disturbing” but declining to assign blame or accuse the U.S. military of improper behavior: In this particular case, [I] want to meet with the Pentagon to press the need to learn lessons from this tragedy. These stories are not easy for us to report or to be involved in. They test our commitment to viewing events and actions objectively. What matters in the end is not how we as colleagues and friends feel; what matters is the wider public debate that our stories and this video provoke. Baker’s story went much farther, quoting three human rights experts describing the killings as war crimes. While portions of those quotes ended up running in a different Reuters story on the video that appeared yesterday and which Baker is credited as having contributed to, some of the more direct accusations did not. For instance, Baker quoted Clive Stafford-Smith, a human rights lawyer, saying, “I don’t think there’s any question that this is a violation of the Geneva Conventions.” Stafford-Smith didn’t appear in any of Reuters’ coverage of the incident. Baker’s story also paraphrased Reuters lawyer Thomas Kim saying that “further investigation may be required” into the incident—a sentiment that Schlesinger did not express in his initial statement. Kim’s remark does not appear in any of Reuters’ coverage of the killings. The U.S. Central Command has said it has no plans to reopen an investigation. Our tipster is baffled by Schlesinger’s apparent hesitance to take on the Pentagon over the killings: “Nothing about wanting to seek justice for the deaths of the Reuters’ employees or about seeking the truth. Just a bland statement about wanting to work with the Pentagon. Whose side is this guy on? Does he have any spine?” A Reuters spokesperson denied in absolute terms the accusation that Baker’s story was spiked. “It’s 100% not true that the story was spiked,” she said. “Schlesinger sent it back for more reporting. But it was overtaken by events, and parts of it eventually ran in an updated story.” This isn’t the first time Schlesinger has been accused of killing Reuters stories for fishy reasons. In December, Talking Biz News reported that Schlesinger spiked a damaging story about hedge fund manager Steve Cohen after Cohen called to complain. He later admitted that it wasn’t “a bad story” and that it “could have run.” Here’s Baker’s spiked story: BRUSSELS, April 7 (Reuters) – Leaked footage of a U.S.military helicopter firing on and killing a group of people in Baghdad suggests the pilots may have acted illegally,international law and human rights experts said on Wednesday. The black-and-white footage, released by the Web site WikiLeaks (www.wikileaks.com) on Monday, consists of 40 minutes of video from the gun-camera of a helicopter hovering over east Baghdad in 2007 as nearly a dozen men, including a Reuters photographer and his driver, gathered in the street below. According to a transcript of the air crew’s conversation that accompanies the video, the pilots think some of the men are carrying weapons and quickly discuss whether to open fire. “That’s a weapon,” one voice says. “Yeah,” another replies. A U.S. military legal expert said the helicopter crew mighthave a legal defence in as much that they “honestly and reasonably” believed the men were hostile, but a British former army officer said there was “blatant” evidence of a war crime. “Light ’em all up. Come on fire,” says one of the pilots,before the helicopter gunner begins shooting, hitting and killing Reuters photographer Namir Noor-Eldeen, 22, and driver Saeed Chmagh, 40, among others. Chmagh is initially wounded and tries to crawl away. One of the pilots can be heard urging the Iraqi to reach for a weapon so that he can open fire again under the rules of engagement. Several minutes later, a van arrives on the street and three or four unarmed men get out to help Chmagh, picking up his body. The pilots seek permission from commanders to open fire again, relaying the information that people are arriving to”pick up bodies and weapons”. The commander gives approval and the helicopter fires again, killing Chmagh and several others. The U.S. military, which has confirmed that the footage is authentic, said on Monday it regretted the loss of life. A spokesman for the U.S. Central Command said an investigation carried out by the military into the incident found the pilots acted accordingly and he said there was “never any attempt to cover up any aspect of this engagement”. But human rights lawyers and other experts who have viewed the footage say they have many concerns about how the pilots operated, particularly when it came to firing on the van, which was also carrying two children who were wounded in the attack. “I don’t think there’s any question that this is a violation of the Geneva Conventions,” said Clive Stafford-Smith, a U.S.-British human rights lawyer who runs the charity Reprieve,referring to the body of laws that governs armed conflict. “There are two aspects to it — firstly it was clear that these people were unarmed or not fighting, and then there’s the shooting of the wounded man as he was trying to crawl away and people were coming to help him,” he told Reuters. The Geneva Conventions state that protection must be given to those who “collect and care” for the wounded in a conflict”whether friend or foe”, but lawyers said that principle appeared to have been abandoned in this case. DESENSITISED KILLING Chris Cobb-Smith, a former British army officer who has conducted investigations in war zones, said knowing exactly what rules of engagement the pilots were operating under was critical to understanding whether they had acted appropriately. But even then, he said, the decision to fire on the van as unarmed men came to help one of the wounded appeared to be a clear breach of the laws governing military conduct in war. “Engaging the people picking up the wounded is outrageous,”he said. “That is the element that is blatant. That is against all humanitarian law and the rules of conflict — most definitely and without a doubt,” he told Reuters. David Schlesinger, Reuters’ editor-in-chief, said the video showed the “extreme dangers that exist in covering war zones”and said he would seek to meet with officials at the Pentagon to”press the need to learn lessons from this tragedy”. Asked whether the company had any intention of pursuing legal action over the deaths of Noor-Eldeen and Chmagh, Thomson Reuters’ deputy legal counsel, Thomas Kim, said: “Our priority is to engage in dialogue at a senior level with the Pentagon.” He added, however, that the footage, which Thomson Reuters had repeatedly sought to have the U.S. military release, indicated further investigation may be required. Bibi van Ginkel, an international lawyer and senior fellow at the Clingendael Netherlands Institute of International Relations, said the video was only a fragment of evidence and more investigation was needed. But still she added: “My first guess would be that a war crime was committed. Very simply speaking, if people are helping the wounded, they are non-combatants. If force is used against them, then that is a war crime. But will it be investigated.” While the video footage, with its gung-ho audio track —including the words “look at all those dead bastards” — is shocking, some military experts said there may be nothing wrong with the acts carried out given the combat environment. In a military courtroom, a jury would have to decide if the gunner “honestly and reasonably” believed he was shooting the enemy, Gary Solis, a military law expert at Georgetown University, told online magazine Salon. “That will always be a defence,” he said. But whether there are grounds for legal action or not,experts said their bigger concern was about the desensitisation of war, with soldiers appearing to dehumanise the enemy and seeming not to care about killing from afar. “It’s the attitude and mindset of the computer, war-gaming generation,” said Cobb-Smith. “The detachment that a serviceman can now feel when he’s operating a weapons system at such a distance via a video screen. That’s unnerving and worrying.” (Additional reporting by Alastair Macdonald in Jerusalem)

View original post here:
Reuters Chief Shoots Down Story on Killing of His Own Staffers In Baghdad [Exclusive]

Watch America’s Next Top Model Season 14 Episode 5 (S14E05)

Watch America’s Next Top Model Season 14 Episode 5 (S14E05). The models pose with comic Ross Mathews and head to New York’s garment district to be transformed. CWTV “AMERICA’S NEXT TOP MODEL welcomes one of the most influential members of the fashion world, André Leon Talley, as a new judge during cycle 14 of the hit show on The CW. Thirteen new hopefuls from across the country are given the chance to prove they have what it takes when the competition kicks off with a 90-minute premiere on Wednesday, March 10 (8:00-9:30 p.m. ET). Talley, who will join Tyra Banks, photographer Nigel Barker and a weekly guest judge on the judges’ panel, is one of the fashion industry’s most influential style-setters. Currently serving as the editor-at-large of Vogue, Talley is prominent in the world of designer fashion and has a front-row seat to runway shows all over the world. Miss J. Alexander, long-time judge, breaks free from the judges’ desk to take on a mentoring role during challenges with the models. “After cycles of watching the girls not get it right, I thought they would benefit more from my ‘high heels’ and hands-on approach than my sitting in a chair judging their photos,” said Alexander. “And with Andre Leon Talley, this should be the best cycle yet.” Click the link below to watch this episode. Watch America’s Next Top Model Cycle 14 Episode 5 Watch America’s Next Top Model Season 14 Episode 5 (S14E05) is a post from: Daily World Buzz Continue reading

Snoop Dogg & George Lopez Play Chatroulette Bingo

That's a crack-a-lackin bingo! [ Editor's note: I would seriously watch an entire reality series of this. Is Chatroulette Bingo the new Celebrity Poker??? ] View

How Apple Is Dogfighting To Control Your News [Media Wars]

Apple’s iPad could make it the king of old media, arbiter of taste and technology alike. So magazines and newspapers have begun a series of countermoves that could turn the quietest dogfight in media into the most vicious. In one sense, the iPad’s January unveiling was a nerd climax, a landmark for obsessive gadget freaks. But in another it was one in a series of Apple chess movies that will determine how much influence the company wields over the future of magazines and newspapers. If the tablet device and Apple’s associated online shops become popular enough, the company could have a chokehold over publishing technology and content itself. It could become as central to the future of print media as it has become to the future of music, where Apple’s iTunes Store dominates online sales. And it could use that position to promote its preferred technologies over those of rivals, most notably Adobe’s Flash animation software, now ubiquitous on websites. But Apple is but one player in this game; old media are making moves of their own. Apple’s refusal to work with Adobe, whose software is central to most art departments, makes publishers uneasy. And the old media are none too comfortable with Apple reviewing their content and applications for approval, or with the prospect of one company potentially controlling the future of print. So they’re taking steps to preserve their independence. It scarcely hurts that these steps promise to save loads of money in comparison with the path Apple is most enthusiastic about; magazines and newspapers are hardly swimming in surplus money these days. In short, there’s a quiet dogfight going on between Apple and its prospective media partners over the future of the iPad. It’s not open warfare; it’s the sort of quiet maneuvering you’d expect from parties who, on the one hand, need to cooperate but, on the other, can’t stop competing. We’ve outlined some of the maneuvering below: Apple move: Banishing Flash. One of Apple’s most prominent maneuvers was its decision to exclude Adobe’s Flash animation technology from the iPad, as with the iPhone before it. When CEO Steve Jobs unveiled the tablet device in January, it had no support for Flash, and none is likely forthcoming: in a iPad-related meeting with Wall Street Journal editors, Jobs trashed Flash as unstable and unsecure, and said it would be “trivial” for the newspaper to dispense with it in preparation for the Apple tablet. Publisher countermove: Baking Flash into apps. The publishers aren’t just going to flush their Flash investment. It’s massive; since our post about Jobs’ Flash rant at the Journal , we’ve received emails from media types defending the Adobe software. You can read five of the best emails here in an accompanying post . Taken together, they strongly contradict Jobs’ claim that it would be “trivial” for publishers to ditch Flash in preparation for the iPad . Our emailers said Flash is deeply integrated into news outlets, powering sophisticated video players, interactive graphics and — hello? — advertising that would be difficult if not impossible to duplicate using JavaScript and other technologies supported natively on the iPad. As one online producer told us, “Flash for interactive graphics is irreplaceable,” while ditching it “requires broad changes across multiple properties… Oh, sure, just use Javascript: well guess what, we don’t have a bunch of code junkies in our newsroom.” Luckily, Adobe has some little-talked-about software it calls Packager for iPhone . Set for wide release some time in the second quarter, the packager compiles Flash code down to code that will run natively on the iPhone. In simpler terms, it converts Flash code into iPhone code. Will Apple allow this? Adobe’s Jeremy Clark told us it already has: iPhone applications built with Flash Platform tools are compiled into standard, native iPhone executable packages and no runtime interpreter is necessary to run the application. Over 30 Applications built using the [pre-release] Flash Packager for iPhone have already been accepted in the iPhone app store so we’re confident that our method fits within the rules of the iPhone App Store. All of the apps highlighted on Adobe’s website are games or entertainment oriented, but that’s changing: Wired has been working with Adobe, and used Adobe Air to power the demonstration tablet edition featured in its recent video ” Wired Magazine on the iPad .” Wired is probably hoping, then, to use an iPad version of Adobe’s Flash Packager to get its content onto the Apple tablet. Wired could design its e-magazine in Flash, export using Adobe’s tool, and distribute through the iPad App Store. As Editor Chris Anderson told us, It’s fair to say that Wired’s preferred path (indeed, the one we’re on) is cross platform, starting with the Adobe authoring tools we already use every day to put out the print magazine (InDesign, etc). How that emerges in e-reader form depends on the platform—sometimes it’s a straight save as Adobe Air, sometimes it requires going through a cross-compiler tool. But the ultimate aim is create once, read everywhere, with all the fine-grained design flexibility we have in print combined with the new interactive power of tablets. The only complication is performance: The iPad’s Apple A4 processor is weaker than those in most personal computers, so Wired will have to be especially careful with its Flash programming. Apple move: iStore for magazines and newspapers . Although no one will go on record, we’re told that Apple’s working on its own built-in iPad store for magazine and newspaper content — a sort of “iNewsstand” to complement iBooks, the bookstore, and iTunes, the music store. It’s a predictable move, the most logical and consumer-friendly way to distribute e-magazines and e-papers via the iPad. Without a central application for managing subscriptions to perdiodicals, after all, users will end up accumulating a messy jungle of magazine and newspaper “apps” on their iPads, each requiring a separate installation and bringing to the table its own user interface quirks. Publisher countermove : Sticking to apps. There’s no telling how publishers will respond to Apple’s iMagazine stand because it doesn’t exist yet; pricing, interface, format, revenue split and conent rules are still unknown. But the content creators do have one bit of leverage: If they don’t like Apple’s terms, they can threaten to keep selling standalone apps through the App Store. No one publication has as much invested in the iPad user experience as Apple, after all, so why should the publishers care if their apps clutter up the device? Apple move: Censoring content. Apple is already censoring content on iPhone apps, but it’s sending mixed messages: The company banished thousands of apps containing ” sexually arousing content ” like women in bikinis while letting the Playboy and Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Edition apps stick around. It seems likely Apple will have to get more consistent and clear with the rules on the iPad, if only to save itself from headaches. Magazines and newspapers seem to be flocking to the device in large numbers, and their apps promise to be chock full of racy pictures, racy advertisements and even racy PDF copies of the print edition (horror!). The clearer Apple can be up front, the fewer fights it will have with publishers. If it keeps the rules for iPad app content especially restrictive , Apple will have leverage to encourage magazines to distribute through its own iPad periodicals store. Just allow more free expression in the magazine/newspaper store than in the app marketplace. Publisher countermove: Retreat to the Web. Apple can set all the rules it wants for content distributed through its own stores. But no one says publishers have to be in Apple’s store in the first place. if Apple’s policies prove too restrictive — or, worse, too hard to predict — publishers can simply publish whatever they want on iPad-optimized versions of their websites. NPR has already developed such a site to filter out Flash content for iPad users; racier publishers could produce iPad sites to preserve their freedom of expression. In fact, Apple’s PastryKit framework allows publishers to come awfully close to duplicating the iPhone/iPad interface in a Web app. Apple move: Banning apps with Flash baked in. Steve Jobs really seems to detest Flash . So past might not be prologue: Just because Apple allowed onto the iPhone 30 apps cross-compiled with Adobe’s Flash Packager (see above) doesn’t mean the company will allow cross-compiled Flash apps in the future. In fact, Wired ‘s parent company Condé Nast seems worried about Apple banning such apps. CEO Chuck Townsend told Peter Kafka of All Things D he is uneasy instituting the Wired model at other titles, due to Apple’s antipathy toward Flash. So he’s porting other magazines to the iPad using a less ambitious strategy of simply duplicating print pages within the app . That approach would require far less Flash coding, and thus there would be far less lost if Apple banned the technology used in Flash Packager. Publisher countermove: Rally the geeks. Flash Packager isn’t the only tool that takes unsupported code and turns it into native iPhone/iPad software; Novell’s MonoTouch pulls off a similar trick by pre-compiling programs from the Mono programming framework. There are already games in the app store pre-compiled from a Mono game platform , in fact. If Apple tried to ban Wired ‘s tablet edition and the other Flash Packager apps, it would have to try and explain why MonoTouch apps aren’t banned, too. If Apple did ban MonoTouch apps, it would have closed off not one but two major sources of iPhone and iPad apps, undermining Apple’s own platform. If outmaneuvering Apple sounds like an increasingly technical endeavor, that’s because it is. But if old-line publishers want to have any hope at exploiting Steve Jobs’ technologies without getting taken advantage of, they should have started been reading up on such geeky matters months ago,

The rest is here:
How Apple Is Dogfighting To Control Your News [Media Wars]

High Society: A Royal Pain [Recaps]

On last night’s episode of this unholy fiasco, there was a romantic date, more hotel employee murder, and a Dale/Tinsley party showdown that made everyone feel just awful. Paul Johnson Calderon This was a very special week for our little cricket, because he is in love. A socialite in love is like seeing a beaver gnaw on fake wood siding. From far away it looks normal, but up close it is strange and unsettling and off. Obviously the whole thing is fake, just a bit of TV smoke and mirrors done for our glum amusement, but it still said something about how socialites love. The man in question is a fellow named Dirk Chesterfield. Dirk used to be with the French Legionnaires but has since moved to Hollywoodland and is an actor in the talkies. He has a strong barrel chest and a slick in his hair and he thinks that PJC is a “real lovely dame.” They met at an alcohol party that was on the show last week, so don’t try to tell me that this show isn’t building a seriously exciting serial narrative arc. There are layers and lines at work here, real technical storytelling stuff. Basically the way they met was so cute and romantic. PJC was all “You’re cuhh yoooot !” and Dirk grinned bashfully and then a few minutes later lifted up his shirt for PJC and (more importantly) all of us to see. Because Dirk is very into calisthenics, he and PJC went to the gymnasium and did a constitutional. They tossed the medicine ball and used jumping rope and lifted various lifting weights. PJC looked very nervous but clearly found the whole situation very sexy. After the regimen, the two stood panting and sweating in the gymnasium. Dirk said “Try this strengthening tonic! Four of five carnival strongmen recommend it.” PJC smiled demurely and Dirk let out a low whistle and said “Miss Calderon, pardon my forwardness, but you have the eyes of a sober Betty Grable.” PJC batted his eyelashes and then, in interview, told us that he usually doesn’t work out, but that he is in good shape. Because he used to do ballet. And then they showed PJC briefly, doing ballet jumps and spins and stuff. And for a nine-year-old girl, he really was quite good. And then it was time for the date to end and Dirk kissed PJC’s hand and tipped his hat and puttered off in his shiny new DeSoto. Love! Isn’t it lovely. Devorah Rose This is a new character! Devorah Rose is the editor of a magazine that doesn’t really exist called Social Life . So this show is made for her. Or she was made for this show. It’s hard to tell. And, see, that’s the problem. No one really knows who or what Devorah is. Sure there’s this information , but that’s mostly considered mere scuttlebutt. No one truly knows where she is from or how old she is. Some say that you can see her in the corner of one of the Belgian tapestries at the Vatican. Others claim that during the days of the SSTs, a particularly big sonic boom ripped a dimensional hole and she came crawling out of it. Some theorists posit that perhaps she is just a highly charged mass of particles and wind, a natural anomaly like heat lightning or Fairuza Balk. Whatever she is, she is now on this show and she is saying things. Mostly she is there to say mean things about everyone. She hates all of them! Hates Jules Kirby! Hates Paul Johnson Calderon! Hates the film works of Dirk Chesterfield! (Except for His African Bride , in which a young Rosalind Russell does blackface.) Oh, but she looooves Tinsley. They are the bestest of friends. And because this is a reality show and editing can be what it is, they spliced in each person talking about her after she talked about them. “Devorah Rose is poor and stupid and I hate her,” drawled Jules Kirby. “She’s nasty!” hissed PJC. “Devorah Rose [stop] Has the cranial capacity of a common bootblack [stop] According to noted phrenologist, Dr. Sebastian Fingers of the Craniometer Institute [stop]” said Dirk Chesterfield by telegram communique. “I know her, and she wrote a really nice article about me, but we’re not like friends ,” said Tinsley, sadly. Poor Devorah. I’m not really sure what her role on this show is going to be, but I’m guessing it’s just going to be mindless shit-starting. She seems eager for a producer’s prod. Sigh. Jules Kirby When the episode began, Jules was picking bones out of her teeth and muttering to no one in particular, “Damn kids have tiny little finger bones, they get stuck everywhere…” She then set her bedroom on fire and called the maidslaves downstairs and said “There’s something wrong with the bedroom, come up and FIX IT.” When the maid came upstairs she set that maid ablaze and called downstairs and said “Goddammit, there’s something wrong with your maid now. This is outrageous.” After she’d set about five more maids on fire, tossed four bellhops out the window, shrieking down fifteen stories to their deaths, and shot flesh-eating ants out of her mouth at the assistant hotel manager, she finally got things clean the way she wanted them. See? You just have to know how to ask. That’s all. Dale Mercer Mama Dale was on full alert last night. Lemme tell yew, thangs are not raht with Tinsley these dayuhs. There is still this nonsense going on with Prince Cashmere and plus Tinsley just decorated her shitbox one room apartment in some gross place called the Midtown. Oh her life is just going down the tubes. So Dale went over there and inspected the decorating job. She approved, sort of. Tinsley had put some very subtle enormous floral wallpaper up on the walls. She had a lovely coffee table that was glass with rounded gold/brass edging that I thought looked better in Brenda Dickson’s living room, but that’s OK. Dale nodded at the Oriental runners placed at odd angles. She approved of the thick, ornate wood pieces that sat in the bright, chic loft like heavy tumors. But then she gasped and shook her head. Tinsley was painting her bedroom blue . Terrible blue! “You cain’t do blue in a bedroom, Tinsley,” Dale sagely advised her. “It’s like you’re at the bottom of a dang swimming pool.” Tinsley grimaced and said “I’m sorry mommy, I’m so so sorry.” Dale noticed that there was an Ethnic cowering in the corner holding a paintbrush, not sure what to do, so she waved her hand and dismissed him. “It’s not your fault,” she said breezily. “It’s Tinsley’s.” It’s pretty much all Tinsley’s fault, always. After taking the brief tour, D & T got to talking about some sort of event or function or something that Tinsley was going to that night. Dale asked who Tinsley was bringing and poor scared Tinsley just sort of didn’t say anything and Dale knew immediately that something was up. She suspected it was cashmere related. So after she left T’s house, she called her stylist or guru or priest of something and said “I need an amazing dress, now .” Flashforward to the party and Tinsley is there with… yep, you guessed it, the Dark Prince. Dale showed up and acted all innocent. “I’m here to keep you company! You said you were going alone.” And, no Dale, that’s not what she said. She actually didn’t really answer you when you asked who she was going with. Anyway. A big fight ensued with Tinsley meekly telling her mom to leave and Dale basically being the most insanely meddling mom ever. At one point she tried to confront Prince Cashmere in the event hall’s kitchen, but he pushed past her and swatted at the cameras and the whole thing was just mortifying. Dale is actually, I think, clinically crazy. I wish the show was about her. Don’t you wish that? Oh, and that faaaabulous dress she got? It was a pink prom dress with a big childish bow on it. Shrug. Tinz Oh sighs. What a difficult week it was! First Tinsley had to go to the bag place to look at her bags that the nice people are making for her. Her bags are very important to her because they are like something that says “Hello world! This is Tinsley Mortimer !” Before the bags sometimes she would fall down a lot and that would say “Hello world… Here is Tinsley Mortimer…” in a sad Eeyore way and that is not what Tinsley wants now that she is a big girl with her own new room-house. She wants sparkly shiny bags that give smiles to the world and say her name in bright yellow letters. Tinsley also wants to feel like she is doing something, getting her hands dirty, as Poppa used to say. So at the bag place she took out her construction paper drawings and said “Let’s make this!” And the little Chinese worm-man said “Ah yes, OK” and they got to work! She tried to put fabrics in the sewing machine and press the little foot button and then the needle moved and she screamed because it was so scary! Doing things can be very scary sometimes, can’t it? But mostly the bag place was nice because Tinsley got to look at straps and buttons and bows and baubles and that is what she likes most in the world, these days anyway. It used to be a while ago that she liked Guadalupe, her house lady, the best in all the world, but now Guadalupe is back at her faraway home and all Tinsley has is this new person. Her name is Fannie and she is nice and Tinsley likes to be friends with her, but it is not the same. Maybe it’s because Fannie also works for Topper, and sometimes though she knows she shouldn’t because of that poor kitty that died from being curious, she asks Fannie to tell her what Topper is saying and doing and eating. She wants to know if he smiles most of the time or if he is frowning usually, staring out the window and listening to the quiet beep-beeps coming from the street way far down below. But Fannie usually nods her head and says “Jais, jais,” and Tinsley worries that maybe Fannie doesn’t understand her, that maybe she was in her own faraway home for too long and now her mouth is broken and can’t speak Tinsley’s language. So home can be a little disappointing, Tinsley suddenly realized. Without all the old things that used to be fun and good. Tinsley hoped that the party with her new friend Prince Cashmere would be a good time but then Momma showed up! Momma came and Tinsley felt very nervous and embarrassed all of a sudden in front of the clicky cameras and all the bright, bright lights. This is not how she wanted to say “Hello world, I am Tinsley!” Not at all. But Momma wouldn’t listen to Tinsley when she said “Pleeeeeeease Momma, please go home and I will get there soon and we will eat cookies and talk about what shoes we wore today, but right now Prince Cashmere is here and he seems angry. Pleeeeeease, Momma?” Momma didn’t listen. Momma doesn’t listen very much, unless Momma is the one talking. This is also disappointing to Tinsley. Momma is maybe a little bit like Fannie, a broken mouth or ears that just do not understand the things that Tinsley needs them to understand. Why did Topper leave, Fannie? Why are you always mad, Momma? They don’t answer. They just nod and say “Jais, jais” or “No, no!” and Tinsley feels silly and small, like a bug or a bunny. Momma ruined the nice party because she and Prince Cashmere don’t like each other and Tinsley just didn’t know what to do. She had her pretty dress on and the bags had been good and Fannie made the bathroom smell all nice like flowers and it had been mostly a fine day, but now it was very disappointing all over again. Tinsley wondered if maybe she did live at the bottom of a swimming pool. Maybe she really did. The marble floor felt hard and cool on her cheek as she lay down and wanted to sleep, wanted to drift off and be at someone’s faraway home, walk around and touch the walls and see if they were blue too. She wanted to lie on the marble and press very hard into it and make the world spin, turn back time and make everything young again. And she hoped that when she woke up she would feel very warm and safe and not disappointed. And she hoped that she would feel hands on her shoulders, squeezing them in a nice way, not in a Cashmere way. And then she would hear, in a big, happy voice, “Hello Tinsley Mortimer. This is the world.”

View post:
High Society: A Royal Pain [Recaps]

Russian Newsweek EIC Loves Hookers, Blow [Drugs]

Just like angry former expat Matt Taibbi , the editor-in-chief of the Russian edition of Newsweek , Mikhail Fishman , likes to party the Moscow way. But it may all be a set up by the Kremlin. Or maybe not. Who knows? The Daily Beast’s Michael Idov recaps the titillating story that involves cops, political activists, models/prostitutes, sex and drugs. Says opposition activist Ilya Yashin: One night she called me up and asked me to come to her apartment right away. She said she had a surprise for me. The surprise was Nastya, and both of them dragged me into bed as soon as I came through the door. I’d be lying if I said I resisted. Everything was fine until Katya produced a whole pile of sex toys: dildos, whips, handcuffs, ball gags.” Is having a little fun with some pretty ladies and some party drugs such a bad thing? Not everyone thinks so: Let me get this straight,” wrote Ilya Krasilschik, the editor of Afisha magazine, commenting on a Facebook status update after the scandal broke and summing up much of the popular sentiment. “You fight the regime, and in exchange the regime brings you free chicks and blow? Duly noted.” Noted, indeed! The video, in Russian, shows Fishman chopping up a mysterious powder next to a half-naked woman. It gets good at 3:37, maybe NSFW: [ Image via ]

Read more from the original source:
Russian Newsweek EIC Loves Hookers, Blow [Drugs]