Tag Archives: expendables

‘The Expendables’ Cast Hits The New York Stock Exchange

Sylvester Stallone, Jason Statham, Dolph Lundgren and Terry Crews rang the stock market’s opening bell on Thursday. By Eric Ditzian Cast of “The Expendables” at the New York Stock Exchange on Thursday Photo: Devan Pratt/MTV News If there’s one thing we learned from “The Expendables,” it’s that Sylvester Stallone and his crew of bomb-tossing hotshots can accomplish anything. So on Thursday morning (August 19), when Sly and his co-stars found themselves on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange at a time when unemployment is still high and debt is soaring, we had to wonder: What could The Expendables do to rescue the economy? Not a whole lot, apparently — even though their flick hauled in $35 million over the weekend. “We went to the bank; they turned down our credit,” Stallone laughed in an interview with MTV News. “So we thought we’d go to the source. That’s why we’re here. Not to promote a movie. It’s to get a house loan!” There was certainly no shortage of traders, analysts and slick-haired execs on hand to offer financial advice. After Stallone, Jason Statham, Dolph Lundgren and Terry Crews rang the exchange’s opening bell, the stars descended to the trading floor and were promptly swarmed. But Sly and his guys were happy for the attention, basking in the glow of having the #1 movie in the country. Stallone himself didn’t think it would turn out this way. “After the first day, you hope you can win,” he said. “Because I didn’t think we were going to win the weekend. We had some really tough competition with Julia [Roberts and ‘Eat Pray Love’]. But now, I don’t look at them anymore. I just look at how other people are doing. I don’t look at us. It’s kind of like a jinx.” “The people have spoken!” added an exuberant Crews. “They want the badassery! They need it. And they’ve spoken. That’s why it’s the #1 movie in America!”

See the original post:
‘The Expendables’ Cast Hits The New York Stock Exchange

Even ‘Expendables’ Lose Their Shirt on Wall St.

Filed under: Jason Statham , Sylvester Stallone , Dolph Lundgren , Terry Crews , Hot Bodies ” The Expendables ” stars Jason Statham , Sylvester Stallone , Dolph Lundgren and a shirtless Terry Crews could barely contain themselves as they rang the opening bell of the New York Stock Exchange this morning. It’s obvious Crews has invested a lot …… Read more

Visit link:
Even ‘Expendables’ Lose Their Shirt on Wall St.

LA Times To Hollywood: Please Ignore the Box Office Success of ‘The Expendables’

Last week, film writer extraordinaire  Christian Toto  fell under the delusion that yours truly was interesting enough to interview, and if you’re under the same delusion you can read the two-parter  here  and  here . Among other things, Toto asked me about the clout critics wield and the most common mistakes they make. Here’s a combination of my answers: Critics aren’t dumb, they know the public doesn’t much care which way their thumbs point. But critics do know that based on their opinions and reviews they can enjoy an influence over what kind of films get made. And that’s not a small amount of power. Culture is upstream from politics, after all. If you have 95 percent of critics savaging a faithful retelling of the Gospels as anti-Semitic, no matter how successful “The Passion” is, no one’s going to go near that subject matter again. And that’s the goal. Same with anything that comes close to patriotism or conservatism. Such cinematic rarities are frequently labeled “jingoistic, fascist or simple minded.” This is all done consciously and for a desired effect. You have to understand that when I look at the critical community I only see it for what it really is: a journolista cabal of left wingers deeply engaged in a cultural and ideological war, deeply committed to shaping the powerful messaging of sound and fury that emanate from our pop culture masters. As if to prove my point, this very morning Left-winger Steven Zeitchik of the L.A. Times ran  this propaganda piece ; a not very subtle attempt on his and the paper’s part to tamp down any enthusiasm development execs might have to copycat what made “The Expendables” such a box office success and cultural phenomenon: [emphasis mine] But the Stallone picture –  with its hard-charging, take-no-prisoners patriotism unbothered by the vagaries of the real world  (it takes place in a fictional country, for starters) and its caricature of freedom-hating enemies (“We will kill this American disease,” as the TV spot enticed us) – planted itself squarely in the old-school genre. And this weekend, the movie showed that there’s life in that category yet. … On one hand, it’s understandable that a movie of easy American heroism (OK, first-world Western heroism) would catch on. In fact, it’s surprising it didn’t happen sooner. Apple-pie-patriotism already is behind the success of a cable news network and supports large sections of the contemporary country music industry. Why not a film hit too? …. Political eras are, of course, rarely just one thing or another, and the movies we want to see in a given period are hardly monolithic.  But as tempting as it is to infer that the success of “The Expendables” shows a deeper cultural need, it may well be the wrong inference. When times are confusing, we want movies to reflect that confusion, and even to make sense of it. But we probably don’t want to pretend that confusion doesn’t exist. If you’re wondering why Hollywood is so out of touch with the 80% of their audience who aren’t liberal, part of the reason is certainly because much of the industry takes pride in being so, but you also have this kind of constant pressure from cultural enforcers like Zeitchik who disguise themselves as journalists. What Zeitchik’s quite purposefully doing here is toxifying “The Expendables” by ridiculing its simple worldview – as though the nihilism found in the moral equivalency preached by the likes of George Clooney and Paul Haggis is somehow “complicated.” He’s essentially sending out the message that whoring yourself to the movie-going rubes and their desire to see good conquer evil makes you dumb, uncool, and unsophisticated. So don’t do it. And the timing is perfect. Zeitchik wants to slap some of the excitement out of a box office success and affect the narrative before the Monday morning development meetings begin. He’s also offering talking points to his fellow travellers who attend those meetings. Therefore, even though Zeitchik is factually wrong, facts won’t much matter. No one wants the L.A. Times calling their movies uncool and simple-minded, and regardless of how big the hit, no one wants to have to defend “hard-charging, take-no-prisoners patriotism unbothered by the vagaries of the real world.” Not in this town. But again, Zeitchik is simply wrong. From an artistic point of view, “The Expendables” is a much more impressive achievement than the likes of the flood of “Syrianas” that have been bombing one after another at the box office over the past few years. A simple straight-forward story that’s actually about something is much more difficult to successfully craft than a confusing and muddled story that’s believes in absolutely nothing. Paint-by-numbers might not be Rembrandt but it takes more skill than throwing monkey shit at a canvas. The other false narrative Zeitchik tries to poison the development well with, is the false one that says the success of “The Expendables” is something of a fluke: Until this weekend, old-school action movies – defined, for argument’s sake, as films with a slew of explosions, a shortage of moral ambiguity and a triumph of physical effects over digital ones – had seen better days. It’s been nearly two decades since pictures of this sort were produced with any regularity by the studio system, and a lot longer since they were stateside successes. “Until this weekend?” Ah, no. Laughably, to bring home this point, after mentioning Stallone’s most recent “Rambo” and “The A-Team,” Zeitchik then offers up Jean-Claude Van Damme’s “JVCD” as further proof that films lacking in moral ambiguity “have seen better days.” Really? The one-location, self-referential piece of crap  that is ” JVCD ” is Zeitchik’s Exhibit C in this closing argument? But this is what happens when you’re in possession of a laughably biased theory in search of proof – especially when the surprise successes of  “300″ and “Taken,” not to mention “Salt,” the first “Transformers,” and “Gran Torino” – make a total fool of that moral ambiguity theory. That would be like me ignoring the “Bourne” trilogy while making some sort of argument that un-American, shaky-cammed action films starring hardwood don’t make money. There’s plenty of room at the multiplex and plenty of box-office cash for everyone’s worldview. Unfortunately for our side, the Zeitchik’s of the media world will stoop to pulling the “JVCD” Card in order to remove our seat at that table. UPDATE:  A commenter quite correctly points out that in his closing paragraph, Zeitchik talks about action films with heavy CGI effects and explosions, not just moral ambiguity – and that my counter-examples of “300,” “Transformers,” and “Gran Torino” don’t refute that point. Though I close my paragraph to explain that I’m specifically refuting Zeitchik’s moral ambiguity statement (which is most of the overall argument of his write up, and where I was most focused in my response), I could’ve been much clearer in that regard. As far as Zeitchik’s  full  argument, “Salt” and “Taken” are still better examples than “JVCD.” I would also add the hits “Man on Fire,” “Vantage Point,” and “Inglourious Basterds.” Crossposted at Big Hollywood

Read the original:
LA Times To Hollywood: Please Ignore the Box Office Success of ‘The Expendables’

‘The Expendables’ Arsenal: A Weapon-By-Weapon Guide

Weapons supervisor Kent Johnson leads us through the biggest, baddest arms from the action hit. By Adam Rosenberg Dolph Lundgren and Sylvester Stallone in “The Expendables” Photo: Millennium Films Sylvester Stallone proved that his action star still burns brightly with the box-office-winning performance of “The Expendables,” which he wrote, directed and starred in. The veteran of action classics like “First Blood” and “Demolition Man” ceded some screen time in this latest outing to action stars of yesterday and today, particularly the core “Expendables” team of Jason Statham, Jet Li, Dolph Lundgren, Terry Crews and Randy Couture. As impressive as that lineup is, the collected firepower of the group is what makes them really scary. Just try to identify some of those guns and blades in the heat of combat — it’s impossible. So MTV News got on the phone with Kent Johnson, property master and weapons supervisor for “The Expendables,” to get the inside scoop on who used what and why. For those who haven’t seen the movie, spoilers ahead. You’ve been warned. Handguns and Revolvers Stallone actually makes use of three handguns in the movie: a pair of semi-automatic pistols and a more traditional six-shooter, the sort that you’d see in a Western — only far more dangerous-looking. Johnson identified the pistols as custom-made Kimber Gold Combat IIs. “It’s a .45 [caliber],” Johnson said. “Kimber put them together for us. Sly wanted something a little bit different, a little more unique, a little more of an individual style, so we were able to make the body of the gun a little darker with black grips and little chrome pieces on it. Just very subtle, to make it more personal.” As anyone who’s seen the movie knows, Stallone fires those twin pistols at a remarkable rate. According to Johnson, that’s perfectly realistic and all based on the skill of the shooter, who in this case is one of the most accomplished action stars of the past 30 years. “A gun will fire as quick as you let the gun work, because it’s a gas-activated gun — meaning the gas in the chamber causes the recoil — which causes everything to work in the gun and the next shell coming up. So as fast as you could possibly pull the trigger is how fast that gun will.” Compare that to Sly’s revolver, which is an “1873 six-shooter with a 3-inch barrel” seen in the first and last scenes of the movie. “It’s a single-action gun, which means it won’t cock, it won’t fire like [the Kimbers], where you just pull the trigger and it’ll go bang, click, bang, click. With a single-action, you have to pull the hammer back,” Johnson explained. “[Stallone] was using it like the old Western style, like a fanner-type gun. What it is, is you have your finger on the trigger pulled at all times, and you fire and rotate, fire and rotate, by pulling the hammer back on the gun [and then letting it go], which is what a lot of quick-draw and fast-draw artists [do].” Shotguns and Rifles As cool as Sly’s paired pistols are, the undisputed star weapon of the movie is Hale Caesar’s (Terry Crews) automatic shotgun, an “MPS AA-12 Sledgehammer.” The weapon itself is a beastly thing, capable of laying down rapid-fire shotgun blasts. What makes it a force to be reckoned with in “The Expendables” however is the ammo that Caesar fills it with, which he describes in great detail during one particular scene. Said Johnson: “It has fins and it explodes before it hits the target. … It’s like a little missile, a little ground-to-air missile. You could load a shotgun shell with a solid pellet, you could load it with birdshot, you could load it with buckshot, you could load it with all different things. The way we did it [in ‘The Expendables’] was, basically, [we built it] to take down buildings, and it does. In real life, this shotgun would do pretty close to what you see on the screen.” Even more frightening is the idea that such a destructive bit of firepower exists. It does, Johnson said — sort of. “There’s something like that that does exist, yeah. We basically made up our own shell, but we copied one that was a prototype that is in development for the military.” A range of assault rifles are also on display in the movie, though the climactic battle is highlighted by two in particular. First, you have the bad guys, led by David Zayas’ General Garza. “All of Garza’s military guys we had [equipped] with AK-47s,” Johnson revealed. “Which is the right gun, [because], basically, they work all the time. So the AK-47, which is the old traditional standard workhorse, versus our boys with their modern weaponry.” In the case of the Expendables, “modern weaponry” is one tactical assault rifle in particular: the Noveske N4. “In the real world, it’s high-tactical, more in Europe than the States. It’s a high-caliber, it’s a very uniquely balanced weapon, a close-quarters weapon. It’s short and has a lot of firepower,” Johnson said. As with most of the other weapons on display in the movie, the N4 was Stallone’s pick. “He liked the look; it works off of rail systems, so we were able to put smaller but better sights on it, we were able to put better scopes on it. Visually, it was just a better, more futuristic-but-contemporary look without getting into silver [plating] or other crazy things, it’s just a real kick-ass weapon.” The Sharpened Blade Not all of the weapons in “The Expendables” go boom. Some slice through the air with nary a sound. Dolph Lundgren’s Gunner Jensen and Jason Statham’s Lee Christmas both make notable use of bladed weapons. “[Lundgren’s] Bowie knife … that was a Gil Hibbons. That’s the knife that Gunner gives Christmas [at the beginning of the movie]. “Gil Hibbons made a custom knife for us, for Sly. He and Sly have worked throughout the years together,” Johnson continued. “It was a white-bone handle and had the Expendables logo, the same logo that was on the motorcycles. It’s a traditional Bowie knife, but he custom-made it for us for the movie. The design was Gil’s, but he [used] some subtleties in the handle, very small little subtle things to make it a unique piece.” Then there’s Statham’s Christmas, who excels at killing silently from a distance with his throwing knives. “That was director’s choice on the [throwing] knives to have a little ring at the top so [Statham] could flip them and do different things,” Johnson explained. “We worked in different ways on making [Statham’s draw look right]. We went from a shoulder draw to a hip draw to kind of like a gun draw almost. That’s pretty much what we ended up with, where we had the three knives on each side of his hips. “That was the director’s idea in working with Jason, what made him feel comfortable and made him feel like he could be as quick as anybody with a gun with that knife. You’ve got to be able to get that knife and then be able to get the second one and the third one. He always carried at least six knives with him at all times when he was in his combat gear.” Finding the Right Weapons for the Job With all the killing force detailed above, the obvious question is: Where does it all come from? Johnson, being the man who makes it all happen, has the answer. “There’s different prop rental houses and different weapon rental people. I’ll work with the director and what his vision is for the movie, and basically I’ll go out and bring him an assortment of guns. Sly’s even gone to the gun room, multiple times, where he wanted to look at things,” Johnson said. He’s worked on Stallone projects since 1989’s “Tango & Cash,” and on “Big Trouble in Little China,” “Death Wish II,” “The Final Countdown” and others before that. “There’s one shop that I work with extensively called Independent Studio Service. They’re in Sun Valley, California, and they have the biggest weaponry [selection] probably in the world for the movie business,” he said. The guns themselves are the other key to the puzzle. These are all actual weapons that have been converted for prop use, though in most cases converting them back to live weapons is possible. Some of them still are live weapons; they’re simply loaded with blanks. “A gun with blank ammo, all you’re doing is making the gun think it’s firing a bullet,” Johnson explained. “They’re all real guns, they all have been modified to shoot blanks. Sly’s 3-inch 1873 six-shooter that he had in the small of his back, you could put live rounds in that gun and fire that gun because it’s a non-plugged gun. Non-plugged meaning, when you fire a semi-automatic or a full automatic, you actually plug the barrel of the gun and control the amount of gas that stays there to make the gun think that it’s shooting a live round out. “So you’re fooling the gun. All of these guns that are converted for studio use can be converted back to live fire.” Check out everything we’ve got on “The Expendables.” For breaking news, celebrity columns, humor and more — updated around the clock — visit MTVMoviesBlog.com .

View post:
‘The Expendables’ Arsenal: A Weapon-By-Weapon Guide

Weekend Receipts: The Expendables Eat Pray Love and Scott Pilgrim for Dinner

Looks like the agents for Hulk Hogan, Mr. T, Carl Weathers and Steven Seagal should wait by their phones: The Expendables exploded the box office this weekend, meaning Ari Lerner’s dream of a sequel remains quite alive. In other box office news: Julia Roberts will have to hope for Julie & Julia -like legs and Scott Pilgrim ran out of quarters. Click ahead for the weekend receipts.

Originally posted here:
Weekend Receipts: The Expendables Eat Pray Love and Scott Pilgrim for Dinner

Friday Box Office: The Expendables Explode

Sorry ladies: this weekend at the box office is all about the men. The Expendables — Sylvester Stallone’s paean to the power of protein shakes — crashed to the top of the charts on Friday night, besting newcomers Eat, Pray, Love and Scott Pilgrim vs. The World with ease. Of the latter film: Yikes. Universal will have to find a cheat code to keep Edgar Wright’s whizbang graphic novel adaptation out of fifth place. Click ahead for the top-five.

Read this article:
Friday Box Office: The Expendables Explode

5,000 Children Separated From Parents by Recession to Reunite

Over a decade of war and bad economic management have hurt what matters most . Kids . added by: artemis6

World’s Biggest Food Fight

Five tons of tomatoes + 20,000 revelers = absolute food fight chaos in Valencia, Spain’s annual Tomatina.

Continued here:
World’s Biggest Food Fight

Where Were They Then:<br>Sylvester Stallone

Ever call Sylvester Stallone the “Italian Stallion”? Find out why The Expendables star has a porn name.

Read this article:
Where Were They Then:<br>Sylvester Stallone

‘The Expendables’: The Reviews Are In!

Critics have mixed reactions to Sylvester Stallone’s homage to ’80s action movies. By Eric Ditzian Sylvester Stallone in “The Expendables” Photo: Lionsgate Three high-profile flicks debut this weekend, and they couldn’t be more different from one another — few people would confuse the globe-trotting vision quest of “Eat Pray Love” with the comic-influenced landscape of “Scott Pilgrim vs. the World” or the shoot-first-ask-questions-never action of “The Expendables.” Nor should anyone be confused about which of these films will end up winning the weekend box office. “The Expendables,” Sylvester Stallone’s fireball-enveloped ode to ’80s action flicks, is poised to blast away the competition despite decidedly mixed reviews. Some critics have lamented the film’s soggy storyline and over-the-top dialogue, while others have celebrated the full-tilt action sequences and the spectacle that results from Stallone, Bruce Willis and Arnold Schwarzenegger sharing the screen. A sampling of reactions is below. The Story “In the rousingly explosive ’80s-pulp climax of ‘The Expendables,’ Sylvester Stallone’s old-tin-soldiers-of-action mercenary thriller, the director-star and his right-hand lug, Jason Statham, lead a band of commandos in an assault on the island fortress of a corrupt general. The funny thing is, they don’t really have a plan. The ‘plan’ is this: They show up and attack the general’s men with fists, knives, and very big guns. The way that Stallone directs, though, every machete thrust and relentless round of bullet spray is staged with a certain undeniable … conviction.” — Owen Gleiberman, Entertainment Weekly The Performances “What makes ‘The Expendables’ bearable and even enjoyable is that Stallone and most of the cast maintain exactly the right attitude toward this nonsense. There’s a certain lumbering grace to the movie that comes with age and experience and the urge to not take oneself too seriously. There’s also an awareness of when he-man posturing crosses the line into genuine moral ugliness on the part of the villains.” — Ty Burr, Boston Globe The Action “Stallone has an eye for spectacle and stages some truly insane set pieces — a dock explosion and Statham shooting bullets from the top of a seaplane comes about 30 minutes in, and it’s fantastic — but not only does none of it fit into a coherent story, but you’ve got no reason beyond nostalgia to care about this group of self-satisfied roughnecks and their desire to track down a criminal, even one as sleazy as Eric Roberts (who is probably the film’s acting MVP, though that doesn’t say much).” — Katey Rich, CinemaBlend The Effects “Featuring pyrotechnic displays over-the-top enough to alter the planet’s orbit, the aesthetic here is very much in keeping with the ’80s action pics that established Stallone’s career, save for the use of digital blood in lieu of old-school squibs. When the Expendables shoot anonymous evil henchmen, they don’t just die, they erupt, sending a shower of virtual viscera across the screen — a distractingly artificial way of rendering violence presumably intended to appear more realistic (for those who’ve wondered what a knife to the throat or a mini-cannon to the head might look like).” — Peter Debruge, Variety The Final Word “The movie is a good-humored affair, and it delivers exactly what the action audience wants (or once wanted, anyway): maximum damage. In the production notes, the star emphasizes his avoidance of CGI in rendering the fiery mayhem, and he claims the actors did their own stunts (although in one furious beat-down scene in which he takes part, you have to wonder). This dedication to a faded action-flick ideal is rather touching, and you wonder how long Stallone, now 64, can keep carrying the old-school flag. When he pops up unexpectedly in the midst of one of the film’s many conflagrations, the general’s daughter turns to him and says, ‘How are you here?’ Says Sly: ‘I just am.’ Welcome back, champ.” — Kurt Loder, MTV News

Go here to read the rest:
‘The Expendables’: The Reviews Are In!