Tag Archives: fringe

Keri Hilson ‘Pretty Girl Rocks’ For Troops At ‘VH1 Divas’

Songstress thanks soldiers for their service during her performance. By Mawuse Ziegbe Keri Hilson performs during “VH1 Divas Salute the Troops” Photo: Getty Images Armed with her girl-power single “Pretty Girl Rock,” Keri Hilson rocked members of the U.S. Armed Forces at the “VH1 Divas Salute the Troops” event. Decked out in a gold bustier, high-waisted pants and a fringe-laden jacket, Hilson brought her saucy, sexpot swagger to the stage. Flanked by four back-up dancers in stylized military jackets that showed a lot of leg, the ladies oozed sassy sexuality as the Atlanta songstress swiveled her hips and cooed, the mass of concertgoers cheering her on. (Click here to see photos from “VH1 Divas Salute The Troops” .) After giving the soldiers a fun show, Hilson gave a shout-out to the service members, thanking them for protecting Americans at home and abroad. “You guys are so beautiful. I just want to say thank you so much because if it wasn’t for each and every one of you, we could not be here and have the freedom to do what we do,” she said. Hilson reveled in that freedom by putting in work through the event. In addition to her solo set, Hilson got it started with her fellow Divas several times throughout the night. She joined Katy Perry and Sugarland’s Jennifer Nettles for a rousing, retro opening number, and teamed up with Nettles once again for a rendition of soul great Aretha Franklin’s 1968 anthem “Think.” The songbird later broke down her “Divas” experience to reporters, and said participating in the event was “incredible.” “I’m in great company with past Divas, and not only is it about me being here, it’s also about what we’re doing here, supporting the troops. I took pictures with guys yesterday … and one of them just said, ‘I just want to thank you for coming. Thank you for doing this. Not many people do this and take time out of their schedule to do something like this,” she explained. “It’s been not only enlightening, it’s been very fulfilling. I’m very happy to be here.” What did you think of Keri Hilson’s performance at “VH1 Divas”? Let us know in the comments! For photos, videos and info on how you can salute the troops, head to the “VH1 Divas Salute the Troops” page . Related Videos Performances At ‘VH1 Divas Salute The Troops’ Related Photos Fashions At ‘VH1 Divas Salute The Troops’ Related Artists Keri Hilson

See the original post:
Keri Hilson ‘Pretty Girl Rocks’ For Troops At ‘VH1 Divas’

Nicki Minaj, Katy Perry Glam It Up At ‘VH1 Divas’

Patriotic looks and retro styles were also big at military tribute. By Mawuse Ziegbe Nicki Minaj at “VH1 Divas Salute The Troops” Photo: MTV News Stars didn’t shy away from bold fashion choices when it came to supporting soldiers at the “VH1 Divas Salute the Troops” event. Celebs hit the stage and the red carpet in looks that either paid homage to the military’s legacy or rocked the soldiers’ worlds with eye-popping outfits. (Click here to see photos from “VH1 Divas Salute The Troops” .) Nicki Minaj piled on the color in an orange-and-blue-hued, long-sleeved mini-dress, turquoise tights and fringe-covered platforms when she rocked the stage. She finished off the look with a puffy trapezoidal white wig with pink tips and a large beaded necklace. Snooki topped off her snug little black dress with an officer’s cap that she brightened up with a pink bow. Katy Perry went for ’40s glam in many of looks, like her crimson sequined gown with a sweetheart neckline and daring thigh-high slit. She upped the vamp factor with long red gloves and a diamond cuff. Perry also got patriotic with a tube top emblazoned with the American flag paired with sparkly hot pants. Keri Hilson, Perry and Jennifer Nettles took it back with their World War II-era style in the show’s opener, swishing about in spangled gold and white mini-dresses and military hats. Grace Potter went runway-chic with a tiny silvery beaded number adorned with long fringe that showed off her long legs. The Situation got spiffed up his typically casual look with a vest and black button-down shirt with paisley accents, paired with grey jeans and black kicks. Supermodel Marisa Miller was suitably dressed for the occasion in an olive drab jumpsuit nipped at the waist with a wide belt, a look she softened with a wavy retro hairstyle. Hilson rocked both the stage and red carpet and an all-black outfit she enlivened with glitzy accents like sparkly lapels, studded jewelry and bedazzled booties. What did you think of the fashion at “VH1 Divas”? Let u know in the comments! For photos, videos and info on how you can salute the troops, head to the “VH1 Divas Salute the Troops” page . Related Photos Fashions At ‘VH1 Divas Salute The Troops’ Related Artists Nicki Minaj Katy Perry

Read the original here:
Nicki Minaj, Katy Perry Glam It Up At ‘VH1 Divas’

Sugarland Tap MC Lyte, Keri Hilson For ‘VH1 Divas’ Duets

Country duo perform ‘Stuck Like Glue’ and cover Aretha Franklin’s ‘Think.’ By Mawuse Ziegbe Jennifer Nettles, MC Lyte and Kristian Bush of Sugarland perform for “VH1 Divas Salute the Troops” Photo: Kevin Winter/Getty Images When country duo Sugarland hit the stage at “VH1 Divas Salute the Troops,” they didn’t just bang out their hits for the soldiers, they mixed up their set list with some offerings from the rap and R&B worlds as well. Following an introduction by model Marisa Miller and frontwoman Jennifer Nettles’ brother, who serves in the military, the country duo kicked things off with their twangy hit “Stuck Like Glue.” Kristian Bush strummed the song’s opening notes on an acoustic guitar, as Nettles helmed the first verse with her trademark plucky energy. Rocking a chunky statement necklace, black tank top and skinny trousers, the songstress drew hoots from the crowd throughout the catchy chorus. The soldiers swayed and sang along as Nettles belted the sunny jam to the mass of service members packed into the Marine Corps Air Station Miramar hangar in San Diego. Nettles and company gave their country smash a hip-hop revamp courtesy of legendary femcee MC Lyte, who joined the pair midway through the set. Lyte bounded on stage in an olive drab jacket, dangly silver hoops and jeans, and dropped a few bars. “We went together/ Whatever is whatever, I got the kind of love that just won’t let up/ You for me, me for you/ Forever is forever, stuck like glue,” Lyte rhymed. (Click here to see photos from “VH1 Divas Salute The Troops” .) After hip-hop and country divas grooved together, Lyte skipped over to bust out some of the song’s catchy “wah-oh, wah-oh” scats. Merging her hip-hop background with the country outfit, Lyte cheerfully galloped across the stage and commanded concertgoers to put their hands in the air. The duo showcased their versatility throughout the night, and also covered R&B icon Aretha Franklin’s 1968 hit “Think.” Nettles donned a suitably sensational look to tackle the Queen of Soul’s repertoire, working it out in a shimmery mini-dress with a swingy fringe hem. Not that they needed it, but the duo did get some assistance from an R&B pro when Keri Hilson — who joined Nettles and Katy Perry earlier for the show’s opener — returned to the stage. Rocking a belted black vest and leggings, Hilson traded lines with her country counterpart, slowing things down a bit during the bridge. The duet culminated in a soulful back-and-forth of trills between the ladies, before Nettles dedicated the performance to the song’s original singer and one of music’s original divas. “Miss Aretha Franklin, get well soon,” Nettles declared. “We need your voice, baby!” What did you think of Sugarland’s performance at “VH1 Divas”? Let u know in the comments! For photos, videos and info on how you can salute the troops, head to the “VH1 Divas Salute the Troops” page . Related Videos Performances At ‘VH1 Divas Salute The Troops’ Related Photos Fashions At ‘VH1 Divas Salute The Troops’ Related Artists Sugarland

Read more:
Sugarland Tap MC Lyte, Keri Hilson For ‘VH1 Divas’ Duets

Rihanna Opens American Music Awards With Island Flavor

Loud singer belts ‘Love the Way You Lie Part II,’ ‘What’s My Name?’ and ‘Only Girl in the World,’ in nine-minute long set. By Mawuse Ziegbe Rihanna performs at the American Music Awards on Sunday Photo: Kevork Djansezian/Getty Images/DCP Days after dropping her fifth disc, Loud, Rihanna made a flamboyant statement at the American Music Awards on Sunday night (November 21). Although the Barbadian singer, who was also nominated for Favorite Female Artist, recently admitted to MTV News that kicking off the show “is a lot of pressure,” the flame-haired songstress handled awards-show opening duties with aplomb and her typical sassy energy. The singer opened the performance a cappella with “Love the Way You Lie Part II,” perched on a stylized tree hovering above a field of sable-colored blades of grass. After plummeting from the “tree,” which was actually a glowing spiked set piece, she emerged from plumes of fog and busted into “What’s My Name?” A lightning-quick costume change revealed her in a black-and-white bra top and boy shorts, her red hair twisted into tight curls as she gyrated to the beat of the calypso-tinged jam. She belted the track solo until dancers in fringed skirts invaded the stage for a dancehall–themed breakdown. Rihanna then kicked up the island theme, as drummers pounded away and more dancers rocking tribal-themed garb hit the stage for “Only Girl in the World.” The drummers encircled the Ri and the strobe lights kicked on as she rocked the bridge, jamming alongside the musicians with sultry abandon. Flames shot up from the back of the set as about a dozen dancers helped her wrap up the high-energy, cross-cultural performance. All the characters left the stage to allow Rihanna to return to the large spiky set-piece and end as she began, crooning the final notes solo. The star-packed audience rose for a standing ovation. While Rihanna is still in her early twenties, the songbird is five albums deep into her superstar career. Even with a towering stack of hits behind her the Loud singer has said she’s amped to unleash her latest effort, which she pegs as a collection of tracks that really sum up what she’s all about. “I can’t believe it’s the fifth album already,” she told the BBC in October. “That’s insane to think about. … I’ve never been this excited about anything I’ve done creatively, and this is just the perfect Rihanna album: Every song is tailored to me.” She also wanted the record to reflect her signature style, not just crank out standard-issue pop jams. “I wanted songs that were all Rihanna songs that nobody else could do. I didn’t want the generic pop record that Ke$ha or Lady Gaga or Katy Perry could just do and it’ll work. I wanted a song, or songs, that were Rihanna songs, that only I could do, had that little West Indian vibe to it, had that certain tone, a certain sass and a certain energy.” What did you think of Rihanna’s performance at the AMAs? Let us know in the comments! Related Photos 2010 American Music Awards Red Carpet Related Artists Rihanna

More:
Rihanna Opens American Music Awards With Island Flavor

The Mad Science of Fringe: A Study in Excessive Facial Expressions

After last week’s surprisingly boring mythology-development episode of Fringe, “The Abducted” at least tried to liven things up with some sad alt-Broyles backstory. Too bad underneath all those revelatory, family-building moments, the episode made about a lick of sense. Read on for the breakdown!

Go here to see the original:
The Mad Science of Fringe: A Study in Excessive Facial Expressions

The War on Terror is a Hoax

Due to the recent national outrage against the allegations of abuses by the agents of the Transportation Security Administration (TSA), it's time to remember what the so-called “War on Terror” really is. The War on Terror is a Hoax By Paul Craig Roberts According to US government propaganda, terrorist cells are spread throughout America, making it necessary for the government to spy on all Americans and violate most other constitutional protections. Among President Bush’s last words as he left office was the warning that America would soon be struck again by Muslim terrorists. If America were infected with terrorists, we would not need the government to tell us. We would know it from events. As there are no events, the US government substitutes warnings in order to keep alive the fear that causes the public to accept pointless wars, the infringement of civil liberty, national ID cards, and inconveniences and harassments when they fly. The most obvious indication that there are no terrorist cells is that not a single neocon has been assassinated. I do not approve of assassinations, and am ashamed of my country’s government for engaging in political assassination. The US and Israel have set a very bad example for al Qaeda to follow. The US deals with al Qaeda and Taliban by assassinating their leaders, and Israel deals with Hamas by assassinating its leaders. It is reasonable to assume that al Qaeda would deal with the instigators and leaders of America’s wars in the Middle East in the same way. Today every al Qaeda member is aware of the complicity of neoconservatives in the death and devastation inflicted on Muslims in Iraq, Afghanistan, Lebanon and Gaza. Moreover, neocons are highly visible and are soft targets compared to Hamas and Hezbollah leaders. Neocons have been identified in the media for years, and as everyone knows, multiple listings of their names are available online. Neocons do not have Secret Service protection. Dreadful to contemplate, but it would be child’s play for al Qaeda to assassinate any and every neocon. Yet, neocons move around freely, a good indication that the US does not have a terrorist problem. If, as neocons constantly allege, terrorists can smuggle nuclear weapons or dirty bombs into the US with which to wreak havoc upon our cities, terrorists can acquire weapons with which to assassinate any neocon or former government official. Yet, the neocons, who are the Americans most hated by Muslims, remain unscathed. The “war on terror” is a hoax that fronts for American control of oil pipelines, the profits of the military-security complex, the assault on civil liberty by fomenters of a police state, and Israel’s territorial expansion. added by: maasanova

CNBC’s Kernen Challenges Pa. Governor on Tea Party ‘Fruit Loops’ Label and Pass Given to MSNBC’s Schultz

As we near the midterm elections, left-wingers will be reading from the same tired playbook – the attempted marginalization of the Tea Party movement, but just more of it. But more and more, they are discovering the tactics are tougher to defend, as their side has their own fringe, loose-cannon elements. On CNBC’s Sept. 29 “Squawk Box,” hosts Joe Kernen and Michelle Caruso-Cabrera went after Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell for what seems to be hypocrisy – a willingness to attack one side for extremism, while ignoring extreme elements on the left. Rendell was asked by Kernen to elaborate on remarks he made earlier this month, that some Republicans are “fruit loops,” “whackos,” and “flat-out crazy.” KERNEN: I want to talk to you about something, later about — you’re calling Tea Party people wing nuts and fruit loops? RENDELL: Not all of them. KERNEN: Not all of them? You saw the president, the president basically said that most of them, most of the Tea Party “are directed and financed by powerful and special interests lobbies,” this is in the Journal today. That’s most of them and the rest of them are bigots. So you’re either directed by special interests … RENDELL: I don’t believe it. KERNEN: Seventy-one percent of Republicans, according to this poll today in the Journal identify – so, you’ve just trashed the entire half of the country. CARUSO-CABRERA: He says slowly but surely, the GOP is taken over by whackos. RENDELL: There’s no question about that. But Kernen pressed Rendell on this and asked why some on his side, including Ed Schultz, of CNBC’s sister network MSNBC’s “The ED Show” was held to a different standard. KERNEN: But, Ed Schultz calls Gov. [Chris] Christie a cold-hearted fat slob and he’s not a fruit loop? He’s fat himself. He’s not a fruit loop? RENDELL: We didn’t nominate Ed Schultz to be a United States Senator or Governor. There’s a big difference. KERNEN: Blowhard. RENDELL: No, no look – I think there’s too much name-calling and I think Gov. Christie, by and large is doing the right thing. Caruso-Cabrera, author of the forthcoming book “You Know I’m Right: More Prosperity, Less Government,” insisted that Rendell explain why, if he thinks there is “too much name-calling,” he name-called. CARUSO-CABRERA: But, why did you name-call? KERNEN: Yeah RENDELL: Because there are some people who are and you can’t deny it. CARUSO-CABRERA: You’ll stand by that – that they’re still being taken over by whackos? RENDELL: Yeah and let me give you an example. KERNEN: Wing nuts and fruit loops are in the eye of the beholder and I guarantee you – you have half the country looking at the other side saying there’s fruit loops and wing nuts. They use different words. Almost laughably, Rendell insisted that the fringe elements on the left-wing progressive side weren’t as extreme. Rendell made this assertion, despite the backlash Obama has received from the so-called “professional left,” despite Obama admittedly being the most “progressive” president in the history of the United States . RENDELL: Maybe. I don’t think they’re quite as extreme. KERNEN: Oh my – are you kidding me?!? RENDELL: One of our candidates – KERNEN: Can you imagine President Obama is being pilloried by people who think he hasn’t been liberal enough? Can you believe there are people that exist like that? He just said he is the most progressive, he just he passed the most progressive agenda in this history of the country. He concedes to that and yet it’s not progressive enough for most of these people? What does this alleged wizard-of-smart do on a business network to backtrack out his tough spot? He went straw-man and invoked some of the candidates’ stances on social issues. RENDELL: Well look, I tell you absolutely. There are people on both sides of the political spectrum that are saying stuff that doesn’t make sense. But we haven’t nominated him nor senator or governor. You have people out there saying you must have the child of someone who rapes you, you must have the child. That is insane. CARUSO-CABRERA: You’re focusing on the wrong issues. RENDELL: No, no. CARUSO-CABRERA: This is about fiscal issues and you want to try to take it somewhere else. RENDELL: I think that’s important. Look, I think that is so important. Kernen pointed out Rendell was probably glad to have Delaware ’s GOP nominee for U.S. Senate, Christine O’Donnell with all her stances on social issues as a distraction. And Rendell showed his willingness to go to that well by referring to other left-wing favorite targets – conservative women including Sharon Angel and Rep. Michele Bachmann, R-Minn. KERNEN: We have to go. You are so lucky for the O’Donnell with the monkey brain, witchcraft. She is your dream candidate. RENDELL: It’s not just O’Donnell. It’s Sharon Angel, it is Michele Bachmann. KERNEN: She is your dream candidate. RENDELL: I want to ask you something about Michele Bachmann. Rendell didn’t get to ask about Bachmann, but Caruso-Cabrera did urge viewers to reply to Rendell’s seeming double standard by e-mail at squawk@cnbc.com .

View original post here:
CNBC’s Kernen Challenges Pa. Governor on Tea Party ‘Fruit Loops’ Label and Pass Given to MSNBC’s Schultz

Amanpour Rues Lack of Appreciation for Obama’s ‘Amazing’ Achievements, Then Slams ‘Bizarre’ & ‘Fringe Quality’ of GOP Candidates

Interviewing David Axelrod on Sunday’s This Week, Christiane Amanpour asked him to explain why “people don’t appreciate some of the amazing legislative agenda” that President Barack Obama has “accomplished,” then with Senator Mitch McConnell she denigrated Republican Senate candidates who are Tea Party favorites: “Are you not afraid that their somewhat, one would say, some might say bizarre statements, their sort of fringe quality might actually turn people off?” She also condescendingly demanded of McConnell: “What is Christine O’Donnell’s qualification for actually governing? What is Sharron Angle’s actual qualification for governing?” In a third segment, she cued up Jordan’s Queen Rania to confirm “Islamophobia” mars America: “You’ve seen the reaction and the fallout from the Islamic center, but it goes broader than that. Do you see a sort of a dangerous Islamophobia in the United States?” While she repeatedly pushed Axelrod about why Democrats were delaying a vote on extending the Bush tax cuts for “the middle class,” with McConnell she tried to discredit extending the tax rates for everyone, childishly describing how “there’s also this huge thing that the people of the United States are worried about, and that is the deficit, and keeping the tax cuts will add trillions to that.” Amanpour proceeded to recite a post ridiculing McConnell: And let me ask you this: According to Howard Gleckman at the Tax Policy Center, let’s see what he’s just written: “McConnell would have to abolish all the rest of the government to get to balance by 2020. Everything. No more national parks, no more NIH, no more highway construction. No more homeland security. Oh, and no more Congress.” In that very same post, Gleckman , a former Business Week correspondent, fretted: “I fear the rest of us will be saddled with the consequences of McConnell’s irresponsible pandering” to “the tea partiers breathing down his neck.” Amanpour also insisted Obama’s economic policies are a success: As you know, the recession was declared over. There’s no recession. And many will say that, you know, they stopped it from going into a Great Depression and that they inherited this awful situation… Excerpts from Sunday’s September 26 This Week on ABC, as collected by the MRC’s Brad Wilmouth: Amanpour to David Axelrod: But really, a lot of people, I mean, people from all over the world, frankly, say to me, here comes a President with a huge mandate, a huge reservoir of goodwill, huge promises to change, and, with all of that, his popularity is down. People don’t appreciate some of the amazing legislative agenda that he’s accomplished. Is this a failure of leadership? Has he allowed the opposition to define him? To Mitch McConnell: AMANPOUR: You heard what David Axelrod said about the Republican plan on extending all the Bush-era tax cuts, and that it would really, you know, put the country more in hock. Analysts say that it will cause, you know, add some four trillion or so to the national debt. Are you really going to do that? Or do you think there will be a compromise on extending the middle class tax cuts?   [McCONNELL] So do you not think, I mean, will you quote, unquote, “hold the middle class tax cut hostage” to all the tax cuts you want to extend? MITCH McCONNELL: Well, nothing is being held hostage to anything. It was the Democrats themselves who decided not to have this. AMANPOUR: Well, would you compromise on that? Even after- McCONNELL: I was the only one who offered a bill. There was never a bill in the Senate. And you know why? Thirty-one Democrats in the House, five Democrats in the Senate agreed with me that we ought not to raise taxes in the middle of a recession. What might happen down the road is not the subject today. The question is, do we want to raise taxes in the middle of a very, very tough economy? All the Republicans think that’s a bad idea, and a substantial number of the Democrats think the same thing. AMANPOUR: Right, but there’s also this huge thing that the people of the United States are worried about, and that is the deficit, and keeping the tax cuts will add trillions to that. And let me ask you this: According to Howard Gleckman at the Tax Policy Center, let’s see what he’s just written: “McConnell would have to abolish all the rest of the government to get to balance by 2020. Everything. No more national parks…no more NIH…. No more highway construction. No more homeland security. Oh, and no more Congress.” So where would you get the cuts? [MCCONNELL] But you’re still not saying where the big, big cuts would come from because some of the things you’re talking about at this point – I mean, it wouldn’t be Social Security or Medicare, Medicaid. It wouldn’t be the defense. [MCCONNELL] So all of this comes into the Pledge for America which was announced this week, a platform for future governing by the Republicans. Now, many people say that it’s simply more of the same. You’ve obviously heard a lot of that over the last couple of days as basically nothing new. And whether they’re left, right or center, people are complaining that, in fact, it doesn’t go far enough, particularly for the very enthusiastic Tea Party base that you have. So, for instance, Erick Erickson has written about this pledge, “It’s full of mom-tested, kid-approved pablum that will make certain hearts on the right sink in solidarity. But like a diet full of sugar, it will actually do nothing but keep making Washington fatter before we crash from the sugar high.” How are you going to, well, you’re laughing. [MCCONNELL] No, that’s all right, but I want to ask you, how will you satisfy the base which seems to be really an insurrection now, the Tea Party? Would you agree that they’re cascading into your space? [MCCONNELL] As you know, the recession was declared over. There’s no recession. And many will say that, you know, they stopped it from going into a Great Depression and that they inherited this awful situation, but let me ask you this: You say you want to go out and win in November. I want to play for you something that Tom Ross, the chairman of the Republican party in Delaware, said to me on this program right after Christine O’Donnell, the Tea Party candidate, won in that last primary in Delaware. [TOM ROSS] Right, so that’s Mike Castle who they thought would win that election come November. Now, basically he’s saying perhaps not. So how do you square that? I mean, do you think these Tea Party candidates will be good for you in November? [MCCONNELL] But, I mean, she definitely wasn’t your candidate. I mean, basically, one would say that the Republican- MCCONNELL: You picked out one Senate race. I just gave you 12 places where we have a chance of beating Democrats. AMANPOUR: No, no, no, there are many. Yeah, but there are many, even in your home state. And I want to ask you, actually, what are the qualifications, do these people have? For instance, what is Christine O’Donnell’s qualification for actually governing? What is Sharron Angle’s actual qualification for governing? Are you not afraid that they might be a turnoff, whether it’s at the- MCCONNELL: Am I afraid of having more Republicans in the Senate? Of course not. AMANPOUR: No, that wasn’t the question. The question is, are you not afraid that their somewhat, one would say, some might say bizarre statements, their sort of fringe quality might actually turn people off? I mean, for instance, what do you say about a Sharron Angle, who I know you just had a fundraiser for, who basically talks about enemies in Congress and talks and hints about, you know, armed rebellion to put them down. I mean, is that the kind of talk for a United States Senator? [McCONNELL] But you didn’t tell me what you think about those kinds of comments from people who want to be a, you know, a Senator. I mean, it’s kind of bizarre, don’t you agree? To Queen Rania: You mentioned how this extremist ideology is even coming to play in the United States. You’ve seen the reaction and the fallout from the Islamic center, but it goes broader than that. Do you see a sort of a dangerous Islamophobia in the United States? How do you assess what’s happening here?

Go here to see the original:
Amanpour Rues Lack of Appreciation for Obama’s ‘Amazing’ Achievements, Then Slams ‘Bizarre’ & ‘Fringe Quality’ of GOP Candidates

George Will Schools This Week Panel on Tea Party Causing GOP Civil War

George Will on Sunday gave a much-needed education to the entire “This Week” panel about how the Tea Party is moving the GOP in a positive direction that could alter politics in this nation for years to come. As Christiane Amanpour and her Roundtable guests – Democrat strategist Donna Brazile, National Journal’s Ron Brownstein, and Republican strategist Matthew Dowd – all fretted about the so-called Civil War brewing in the GOP, Will was once again the voice of reason.  “At the beginning of the year, the question was, will the Tea Party people play nicely with others and will they obey the rules of politics? Who’s sort of not playing nicely?” asked Will. “Mr. Crist starts losing the primary to a Tea Party favorite Rubio. He suddenly discovers that he’s an independent and changes all his views overnight,” he continued. “Mrs. Murkowski loses a primary and suddenly discovers that she has a property right in her Senate seat and she’s going to run as a write-in. Senator Bennett thought of that in Utah, Senator Castle in Delaware is thinking of a write-in candidate. Who are the extremists?” (video follows with transcript and commentary):  DONNA BRAZILE, DEMOCRAT STRATEGIST: But, you know, the Republicans have a great story right now to tell. Excuse my voice. I was up watching the LSU game, clearly. But the — the problem I have — and the Republicans should — should understand — is that there’s still an eternal civil war going on within the Republican Party. In Washington state, in Delaware, and Colorado, many of the mainstream Republican candidates have not endorsed the Tea Party candidates. They’ve provided enthusiasm, they’ve provided a lot of energy and organization for the Republican Party, but we don’t know yet if the Republicans can heal those wounds and provide the kind of turnout they need to beat the Democrats. MATTHEW DOWD, REPUBLICAN STRATEGIST: I think that if you gave most Democrats truth serum and they said who’s place would they rather be in, they would pick the Republicans’ place in this year’s election as opposed to their own place in this year’s election. The problem I think for this class that’s coming in for the Republicans is for Mitch McConnell, who just talked to, is his ability to herd them is going to be like herding quail, because these folks are coming to Washington and think, “I’m not going to be part of this. I’m not going to listen to the leaders. I’m going to do what the voters want me to do,” and they’re not going to be — they’re not going to be acquiescent to what the leadership wants. CHRISTIANE AMANPOUR, HOST: And that’s what I actually — I wanted to ask, because in today’s newspaper, there’s a quote by a senior Republican, you know, consultant that, after the elections, it’s going to be basically all-out war, a struggle for the heart and the soul of the Republican Party. You’re shaking your head. GEORGE WILL: They’ve been writing this story for eight months about what a problem the Tea Party is for the Republican Party. You know what the problem… (CROSSTALK) AMANPOUR: Well, Tom Ross basically told us that they lost because of that and they might lose. WILL: On balance across the country, the Tea Party is enormous help for the Republicans. At the beginning of the year, the question was, will the Tea Party people play nicely with others and will they obey the rules of politics? Who’s sort of not playing nicely? Mr. Crist starts losing the primary to a Tea Party favorite Rubio. He suddenly discovers that he’s an independent and changes all his views overnight. Mrs. Murkowski loses a primary and suddenly discovers that she has a property right in her Senate seat and she’s going to run as a write-in. Senator Bennett thought of that in Utah, Senator Castle in Delaware is thinking of a write-in candidate. Who are the extremists? (CROSSTALK) RON BROWNSTEIN, NATIONAL JOURNAL: Donna, I would say, look — I mean, I think clearly this class of Republicans do not feel they are being sent here to Washington to compromise with Barack Obama or to follow the Republican leadership. So in that sense, there’s going to be tension. And I quote Ken Buck in my story as saying so. But if you look at what they are actually going to be voting on, in all likelihood, over the next two years, there is remarkable unanimity in this class. And despite all the focus on the civil war, I think that is kind of a — what the long-range vision of what the federal government should be doing or not doing is where you will see diversity. (CROSSTALK) BROWNSTEIN: But in the near term — in the — in the near term, I think — in terms — the main thing that the Republicans, I think, are being sent here to do is to block and try to roll back whatever they can what Obama did. I think the spending thing will continue to be a challenge for them, because if you want to reduce the deficits and extend the Bush tax cuts, that does point you back toward cutting Medicare and Medicaid, which is exactly the problem they got into in ’95, and they may end up in that same cul-de-sac next year. But I actually believe there is more commonality in this class than is often assumed. And in the near term, they are going to be a very formidable and, I think, cohesive force. WILL: And look at the not-so-near term. In the next two cycles, 2012 and 2014 combined, the Democrats are defending 43 Senate seats, Republicans 22. So the Republican wave that’s now starting is just starting. Indeed. As Will accurately stated, the media have been “writing this story for eight months about what a problem the Tea Party is for the Republican Party.” The liberal press are always trying to figure out a narrative that paints the GOP in the most negative light.   First we were told the Tea Party represented an inconsequential fringe of racists and homophobes that will have no impact on elections. Now that its candidates have produced shocking results across the fruited plain, and have reinvigorated conservative voters like nothing we’ve seen in many years, the movement is going to produce a Civil War within the Republican Party that will either hurt it in November or make it impossible for it to govern if its successful at the polls. This is clearly why you could see Will either shaking his head or seemingly laughing to himself as his colleagues waxed philosophically about some as yet unrealized though oft-predicted calamity associated with this movement. Less than two years after Barack Obama and the Democrat Party won a landslide victory that had the potential of being a political realignment shifting the balance of power in this country to the left for many years nay decades, the Republicans are on the precipice of shocking the world by taking back the Congress. Is it any wonder the media are doing their darnedest to figure out a way to undermine it or that Will is getting such a kick out of watching them try?

View post:
George Will Schools This Week Panel on Tea Party Causing GOP Civil War

ABC’s Walters Disputes Charges of Racism Against Ground Zero Mosque & Illegal Immigration Opponents

Catching up on an item from the Thursday, September 9, The View on ABC, Barbara Walters was at odds with her co-hosts over the issue of whether racism was the primary motivation of the Arizona illegal immigration law as well as opposition to the Ground Zero mosque. Whoopi Goldberg raised the question of whether “there may be an undercurrent of racism in the USA that’s building up,” leading co-host Sherri Shepherd to assert that “you certainly hear racism a lot more, I think, than you ever heard it.” Walters soon jumped in to voice dissent: I think that we’re kind of mixing things up. When you say there’s more racism now, oh, there’s so much less racism than 20 years ago or 50 years ago. … There is racism in this country. That’s not new. There is racism against the President. That’s not new. But I disagree with putting the mosque and the Arizona laws. I think the Arizona laws have to do with losing jobs and people coming across the border to get those jobs. After Goldberg responded, “Then why don’t they say that?” Walters continued: Please let me just finish. It is what they say. It is what they say. And the drug wars right across the border. If you had Canadians – and this doesn’t happen – and they were all coming and taking jobs and there were drug wars- She soon added, “I don’t think it’s because they are Mexican or because they’re brown. … And I don’t think the mosque is because Muslims have a darker skin. That’s fear of terrorism. I don’t think we can mix everything up and say it’s all racism.” Walters and Goldberg soon resumed their back-and-forth: WALTERS: But we’ve also had things about learning another language in school and whether languages should be taught in Spanish. What I’m saying is, of course there is racism, but I don’t think you can take everything that’s happening in this country and say, well- GOLDBERG: If you are targeting, if you are talking about Mexicans coming and taking your jobs, say that. Don’t say “illegal immigrants” when that’s not what you mean because people come from Canada and people come from England and people come from Africa, all over, and their- WALTERS: But they’re not coming en masse. GOLDBERG: -visas go away, but you know what. If you are going after illegal immigrants, then you have to go after all illegal immigrants, not just the brown ones. A bit later, they added: WALTERS: All I’m saying is that, we’re agreeing that there is racism. But I’m just saying that there are other things. The mosque has to do with terrorism. It’s not just the, I know, we disagree. It’s not just the color. I don’t think that you can just do a blanket. GOLDBERG: I think it feels that way. It feels that way, and that’s the question I’m posing. It feels that way. Below is a transcript of the relevant portion of the Thursday, September 9, The View on ABC: WHOOPI GOLDBERG: Do you guys think there may be an undercurrent of racism in the USA that’s building up? Because, now, particularly against brown people? Because we have the Arizona immigration law, the Ground Zero mosque controversy, burn-the-Koran day and the hammering that folks seem to be taking. I can’t think of the woman’s name and it’s probably better, but she was screaming the “N” word all over her Web site. SEVERAL PANEL MEMBERS SAY: Dr. Laura Schlessinger. GOLDBERG: Yeah, so does it feel to you that there’s a little tension or am I just being kooky? SHERRI SHEPHERD: You know, I don’t know if it’s that because we now have an African-American President, all of this stuff that has always been simmering underneath the surface, has bubbled up. Because you certainly hear racism a lot more, I think, than you ever heard it. And so, it just seems like it’s now bubbling up, and, I don’t know, it seems like there’s just something going on- JOY BEHAR: Well, it’s disguised, isn’t it? I mean, as far as President Obama is concerned, some people still say he’s a Muslim, that they don’t believe he’s really American. SHEPHERD: They want to see his birth certificate. BEHAR: Those are kind of like code words for, you know, we don’t trust the other. He’s the other. ELISABETH HASSELBECK: Well, there are fringe groups like that regardless of who’s President. But especially now, it does seem ironic because we have our first black President, yet all this stuff is coming up. And so you have to wonder why, especially since Obama did receive a large portion of what they call the white vote, you know, so it seems disheartening that this is happening. And it does seem like, you know, the word “tolerance” gets spread around, you know, you can be tolerant, but- BEHAR: He got a large portion of the white vote. But this is a small group of people that are pushing this type of agenda that is not American. HASSELBECK: It’s no secret that (INAUDIBLE) have prejudice and it’s disgusting and it’s ugly and it’s there. And it’s been and for some reason now it’s maybe just being uncovered again. BARBARA WALTERS: (INAUDIBLE) I just say something? Okay, because I think that we’re kind of mixing things up. When you say there’s more racism now, oh, there’s so much less racism than 20 years ago or 50 years ago. SHEPHERD: I think maybe overt. Yeah, I think it was a lot of overt, I don’t know, you and I disagree on that. WALTERS: Could I say something? There is racism in this country. That’s not new. There is racism against the President. That’s not new. But I disagree with putting the mosque and the Arizona laws. I think the Arizona laws have to do with losing jobs and people coming across the border to get those jobs. GOLDBERG: Then why don’t they say that? SHEPHERD: Barbara, when you- WALTERS: Please let me just finish. It is what they say. It is what they say. And the drug wars right across the border. If you had Canadians – and this doesn’t happen – and they were all coming and taking jobs and there were drug wars- GOLDBERG: What jobs are they taking? WALTERS: -you would find very much- They are taking, if you look, the reason (INAUDIBLE) HASSELBECK: The jobs that, frankly, no one wants. WALTERS: That’s right, but I don’t think it’s because they are Mexican or because they’re brown. I know you differ- (GOLDBERG SAYS SOMETHING INAUDIBLE) WALTERS: But let me just finish. GOLDBERG: Sorry, Barbara. Sorry. WALTERS: And I don’t think the mosque is because Muslims have a darker skin. That’s fear of terrorism. I don’t think we can mix everything up and say it’s all racism. SHEPHERD: When Jan Brewer signed into law, you know, a law that prohibits the children in school from having their ethnic studies, African-American studies, Mexican-American studies, and you’re prohibiting people from learning about their country and it’s targeting minorities, it certainly seems like it’s not because somebody is taking their jobs. WALTERS: But we’ve also had things about learning another language in school and whether languages should be taught in Spanish. What I’m saying is, of course there is racism, but I don’t think you can take everything that’s happening in this country and say, well- GOLDBERG: If you are targeting, if you are talking about Mexicans coming and taking your jobs, say that. Don’t say “illegal immigrants” when that’s not what you mean because people come from Canada and people come from England and people come from Africa, all over, and their- WALTERS: But they’re not coming en masse. GOLDBERG: -visas go away, but you know what. If you are going after illegal immigrants, then you have to go after all illegal immigrants, not just the brown ones. (AUDIENCE APPLAUSE) HASSELBECK: I agree with that. I absolutely think that it’s powerful, and I think, you know, we can’t spend millions and millions of dollars protecting borders in other nations if we cannot even control our own, and I do think that- GOLDBERG: I totally get you. I get you what you’re saying. WALTERS: All I’m saying is that, we’re agreeing that there is racism. But I’m just saying that there are other things. The mosque has to do with terrorism. It’s not just the, I know, we disagree. It’s not just the color. I don’t think that you can just do a blanket. GOLDBERG: I think it feels that way. It feels that way, and that’s the question I’m posing. It feels that way. HASSELBECK: I’d be asking that question if I were brown or black. I mean, I can totally understand how there is that sentiment. I can totally understand how there is that worry, and I think it’s legitimate. BEHAR: Do you lump the mosque in with Mexico? GOLDBERG: I do. Because, you know, I feel very strongly that you cannot take an entire religion and make it responsible for the kooky people because you can’t, because you have, you know, we don’t want to do that with the Catholic religion. We don’t want to take that religion and say, well, everybody is this, or the Christians or anybody else. BEHAR: If the attack on 9/11 was done by Christians, would they not allow a church? GOLDBERG: Well, that is a good question. That’s a very good question. BEHAR: (INAUDIBLE) but it’s a valid question to ask because, if the answer is yes, then you have a point. HASSELBECK: The Catholic Church right now could never afford that property, so that would answer that question.

Link:
ABC’s Walters Disputes Charges of Racism Against Ground Zero Mosque & Illegal Immigration Opponents