Tag Archives: global-warming

James Cameron vs. Glenn Beck: The Asshole-Off

CELEBRITY BUZZ : James Cameron called Glenn Beck an asshole in a room full of journalists, then challenged him to a global warming debate. Jimmy is 100% right, and yet you're kind of on Team Glenn, aren't you? The Best Links: James Cameron Trashes Glenn Beck James Cameron Challenges Glenn Beck to a Debate, Global-Warming Skeptics to a Shoot-out Read

Former NYT editor asks the question that ALL real journalists should ask. Why is Fox News considered a legitimate source of news?

Here just an excerpt from Howard Raines ballsy opinion piece from the Washington Post : Why has our profession, through its general silence — or only spasmodic protest — helped Fox legitimize a style of journalism that is dishonest in its intellectual process, untrustworthy in its conclusions and biased in its gestalt? The standard answer is economics, as represented by the collapse of print newspapers and of audience share at CBS, NBC and ABC. Some prominent print journalists are now cheering Rupert Murdoch, the head of News Corp. (which owns the Fox network) for his alleged commitment to print, as evidenced by his willingness to lose money on the New York Post and gamble the overall profitability of his company on the survival of the Wall Street Journal. This is like congratulating museums for preserving antique masterpieces while ignoring their predatory methods of collecting. Why can’t American journalists steeped in the traditional values of their profession be loud and candid about the fact that Murdoch does not belong to our team? His importation of the loose rules of British tabloid journalism, including blatant political alliances, started our slide to quasi-news. His British papers famously promoted Margaret Thatcher’s political career, with the expectation that she would open the nation’s airwaves to Murdoch’s cable channels. Ed Koch once told me he could not have been elected mayor of New York without the boosterism of the New York Post. These are very obvious questions which should have been asked way back when Fox News started blurring the line between news and opinion. You know I do believe that was the day of their premiere. Maybe the real journalists thought that the American people would catch on. That they would not be so easily seduced by salacious stories delivered by large breasted blond women accompanied by state of the art graphics and catchy background music. Apparently these journalists gave their fellow Americans way too much credit. The first time that Fox News definitively demonstrated to the world that they were a propaganda arm of the GOP was during the 2000 election when they helped George Bush steal the election. Since then they have been instrumental in helping George Bush fabricate the lie of WMD’s in Iraq to justify the invasion, made up falsehoods about presidential candidate John Kerry, openly attacked the science behind Climate Change, and are currently working non-stop to put a halt to Obama’s Health Care reform . Nobody, and I mean NOBODY, can seriously call what Fox does “reporting the news”. Personally I think their slogan of “Fair and Balanced” was always supposed to be ironic. I have little doubt it still causes Roger Ailes and Rupert Murdoch to giggle every time they hear it. So far the only cable news (or fake news) people to consistently take Fox News to task has been the amazing Keith Olbermann of MSNBC, Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert of Comedy Central, and of course THIS guy. You know if tomorrow EVERY OTHER news outlet suddenly decided, in unison, to call Fox News out on their bullshit, that audiences all across the world would have their eyes opened and that Fox would lose a huge section of its audience in one fell swoop. I mean if CNN took one of their broadcasts on Global Warming for instance, and pointed out all of the made up data and inconsistencies contained with in it, that would have an impact. And if ABC did the same with their coverage of the health care debate, and NBC revealed the manipulations behind their coverage of elections, and CBS spanked them for misrepresenting poll numbers, just think how quickly people would turn a critical eye toward this “cable news source”. I mean it is not like they are going after a colleague. The people on FOX are not “journalists” they are performers. It would be like if a ballet company called out a strip club for promoting their workers as classically trained dancers. Nobody would accuse the ballet company of being jealous or petty, they would just be pointing out the obvious. But you know they won’t do it. Because they are afraid. They are afraid that Fox New will use its money, and its easily manipulated audience, to attack and punish the other news networks. And they are afraid to stand up to that kind of a backlash. And to that I say, “What a bunch of pussies!” Are the other networks so afraid of losing viewers and sponsors that they would refuse to do their duty to inform the American people that they are the victim of a fraud? They have reported when cars are unsafe to drive, when foods may cause our children to be sickened, and when scams are being perpetrated on the elderly, how is this any different? Sometimes it is important to defy a powerful enemy and take a stand for your profession, for your country, and for the truth. After all being attacked by Fox News is not the end of the world. And I should know.

Originally posted here:
Former NYT editor asks the question that ALL real journalists should ask. Why is Fox News considered a legitimate source of news?

How much plastic do you consume while eating fish? More than you want to know…

David de Rothschild and Jo Royle dropped by Current HQ's to chat about their daring plans to sail from San Francisco to Sydney in a vessel made from plastic bottles as part of their mission to educate the world of the perils of plastic. In this short excerpt of the interview, David and Jo describe the state of the ocean and questions if fish eating plastic makes us sick. You can watch more excerpts of the interview and the interview in it's entirety at current.com/plastiki David de Rothschild authored The Global Warming Survival Handbook, hosts the Sundance Channel's “Eco-Trip: The Real Cost of Living”, where he investigates the life-cycle and ecological impact of everyday consumer products from field to shelf. He was also honored by National Geographic as an 'Emerging Explorer', The World Economic Forum named him a 'Young Global Leader', and in 2008 Clean Up The World made David an 'International Ambassador'. Jo Royle is internationally recognized as one of Europe's leading female ocean yachts skippers. Jo's passion for ocean adventure has launched her into a professional sailing career, her accolades include being one of the few sailors to have circumnavigated South Georgia in the Southern Ocean. She competed in the prestigious two‐handed trans‐ocean race, the Transat Jacques Vabre, skippering the only all female team in the 40‐foot class. She is currently completing an MSc in Environmental Science and Society at the University of Central London. To see more interviews with David and Jo go to www.current.com/plastiki added by: leahl

Swimming with whales: Looking into the eye of the beast

Last weekend I was sitting on the edge of a cliff in Big Sur when a whale swam by. My friend turned to me and said, “Every time I see a whale I have an irresistible urge to run to the water and jump in and swim with them.” “Doesn't everyone?” I asked. Apparently not. Even for those rare souls who do have a case of deep desire, most people aren't crazy enough to actually do it. Enter Bryant Austin, the man who has dedicated himself to creating life size photographs of whales. That sounds all fine and dandy until you realize he is coming within 6 feet of a pod of wild animals that can weigh as much as two tons each. First question: “How the heck do you do that?” Lucky for us Bryant explains the process, and told us an amazing story of a close encounter with a carnivorous sperm whale in the following video. After the interview I asked Bryant how he became interested in capturing this unique perspective of whales; he told us a story about his first encounter with Humpback whales. He found himself dangerously close to a calf, and was admiring its agility given their close range of contact when he felt a tap on his shoulder. He explained that he assumed he was bumping into the boat since he was swimming on the surface of the ocean, but when he turned back to look, he was staring into the eye of the mother whale, who had just tapped him with her 15-foot, one-ton pectoral fin. He explained the moment of having actual eye contact with the whale, and realizing that there was a perspective and story that wasn't being told through conventional photographs of whales, and that if he wanted to share this perspective of connecting with the whale. After spending a few days with Bryant's footage and photos of whales I would have to agree. Even as a self proclaimed lover of whales, after looking at these photos, I see the animal in a different way. The photos (his largest photo is 6 feet by 28 feet, and it took 2800 hours to complete) create a feeling of intimacy that Bryant hopes will start to change the way that future generations perceive whales. The short documentary below, “In the Eye of the Whale” tells more of the Bryant's purpose, and explains his experiences of taking these images to the whaling nations. Passion and Purpose Plenty of people go out there and photograph whales, but Bryant has matched his passion with purpose. Whales are in serious danger (to satiate your inner eco geek, see the whaling information at the bottom of this post). Norway is one of the top whaling nations, a country which has a surplus of whaling meat, and has recently raised the limits. Bryant has taken his photographs to Norway to share with adults, and with hopes to influence the youth culture to shift the countries' whale consumption habits. The advocacy for these elements requires a gentle touch of, lets say, a humpback's fin. You need weight and power, and political prowess that allow whaling nations to change their ways with honor. (Norway recently responded to recent pressure by raising numbers even though they have a surplus of meat, while Japan recently requested to negotiate to lower it's “scientific” catch. How can you engage? Of course there are lots of ways to engage with protecting whales. Depending of your flavor of activism there is Greenpeace, there is the notorious Sea Shepperd, and then there is always Bryant Austin's work. Bryant is one of the humbler people who you will meet, and I had to drag the following information out of him re: how we can support his conservation work: We are presently raising funds to reunite with and film the whale responsible for my first life-size composite photo , which will cost about $50,000 (think what goes into getting on boats, equipment, oxygen, and then waiting for the right moment). We are hoping to begin in April of this year. It will be the first of four individual whales we are working to reunite with and film for our upcoming feature length documentary which has a much higher budget! So if you want to support Bryant's conservation efforts, head on over to his non-profit, Marine Mammal Conservation Through the Arts. More information whales for the curious The blue whales of the Antarctic are at less than 1 percent of their original abundance, despite 40 years of complete protection. Some populations of whales are recovering but some are not. In 2003 Palumbi estimated that humpback whales could have numbered 1.5 million prior to the onset of commercial whaling in the 1800s. Humpback whales currently number in the 20,000. Known environmental threats to whales include global warming, pollution, overfishing, ozone depletion, noise such as sonar weaponry, and ship strikes. Industrial fishing threatens the food supply of whales and also puts whales at risk of entanglement in fishing gear. They were initially guarded by an organization with the misleading title of the International Whaling Commission, known more as a “whalers club” than a conservation organization it states it's mission as: “Recognizing the interest of the nations of the world in safeguarding for future generations the great natural resources represented by the whale stocks…..having decided to conclude a convention to provide for the proper conservation of whale stocks and thus make possible the orderly development of the whaling industry”.

Typos Don’t Make Climate Change a Myth

“I’m a natural sceptic,” a British-born web publisher says to explain his recent Tweets expressing doubt about the validity of the science behind climate change . Coincidentally, that’s the same argument used by everyone who prefers conspiracy theories to science. Autism conspiracists tell you to be skeptical of the entire medical community (they are pretty sure some of them are paid by drug companies!) and to trust, instead, in Jenny McCarthy. 9/11 truthers tell you to be skeptical of the government (which is often a good default position) and also of most professional engineers, aviators, and other assorted experts (a little more dodgy). Birthers are skeptical of reality. Skepticism is certainly a virtue, but in the internet age, it basically means “preferring to believe what one guy tells you over what the so-called establishment tells you.” And the guy often has a vested interest in telling you not to believe the so-called establishment. Take climate change skeptics. They would prefer to not ever have any aspect of our unsustainable society reined in, at all, especially the bits that involve burning coal and driving cars and stuff. Over in Britain, their papers have been going nuts over the revelation of errors in the last report form the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. There were two legitimate (but fairly inconsequential) errors in the report that were promptly corrected. The errors did not have anything to do with the question of whether or not climate change is real and human-driven. But, whatever! Cry “scandal” and let slip the “-gate” suffix! When it comes to the question of climate science, I trust climatologists a lot more than British journalists. Have you ever met a British journalist? First of all, they’re all alcoholics. Secondly, and more importantly, journalists the world over don’t understand science. I don’t understand science! I rely on scientists for that. But journalists do understand scandal very well. They are experts in scandal. So what you have here are basically conservative bloggers relying on the scientific illiteracy of journalists to trump up errors (real and wholly imagined) in a report that is a summary of established science , which reliably turns into stories asserting that the evidence behind climate change is “in doubt.” And now the same British people who are all getting the measles again because they’re scared of autism don’t believe in global warming anymore, because it snowed. One of this British publisher’s examples of supposed major threats that turned out to have been overhyped (by the generalist media, keep in mind, and not usually by those cursed “experts”) is “acid rain.” The funny thing about that particular overhyped threat is that it went away because it was combated by determined government action. Our government-hating Libertarian friends at Reason magazine actually just named acid rain reduction as one of their five reasons Libertarians shouldn’t hate Big Government! (Also of note: the fact that a local internet entrepreneur saw some snow in SoHo was for some reason newsworthy enough for Tucker Carlson’s Daily Carlson to make it their lead story this morning. Haven’t any more of your contributors been hit by cars or anything?) [ Pic Via ]

See more here:
Typos Don’t Make Climate Change a Myth

Hey Jon Stewart: The earth needs a new PR Agent. Snowmaggedon climate deniers unite!

Now that it’s snowing in the east coast in winter, we’re screwed. Global warming has once and for all been proven to be a hoax. Just ask Jon Stewart. (BTW, It’s almost insulting that Al Gore continues to be given all of the credit for raising global awareness about climate change. I’m ready for Colbert to start giving the youth of Copenhagen some credit for rising awareness about climate change.) But maybe we can take a moment to say, damn it Al, if you’d only used the term “climate change” rather than “global warming” we might not be in this ridiculous situation right now. Because now that it is snowing in winter, CO2 pollution deniers (because let's remember that this is what this argument is about) have reason to say that Gore is wrong because the earth is not boiling. Thank you Jon Stewart for bringing the funny (my coworkers just mocked me for the amount of laughs I got out of watching this piece): And let's not forget the people in Fairbanks, Alaska, who are angry at Al because they can’t put in pools. (See blog post for link.) But it would appear that everyone appears slightly moronic when they take the time to openly mock people. This insult to graphic design was sent in a joke email attachment between two scientists about climate skeptics, and was leaked during the climate gate scandal. (You can go to the original post on the Guardian to find out who is being referenced and why). I digress. The point is words are powerful. Global Warming was the term that the environmental movement agreed on to explain the process of CO2 pollution (remember the image of the blanket? “Carbon dioxide and other air pollution that is collecting in the atmosphere like a thickening blanket, trapping the sun’s heat and causing the planet to warm up.” It was a term created so people could develop a quick understandable image about what was happening to the planet. But the truth of the matter, when you look at the statistics, and where the real issue lies, is that we are in a pattern of radically shifting climate change combined with pollution and impact on the planet created by one species. So if we can get the thinking away from “global warming” and weather, we might be able to focus on clean air and clean water and that minor issue that we are in the midst of the 6th mass extinction. We are seeing repeated examples of this issue as we note the changing migration patterns of birds, as well as the migration pattern of marine mammals. And yes, the glaciers are melting. Oh, but then there is that minor issue that global warming patterns could very well take us to the next ice age. So where does that leave us? I don’t know. Given the amount of energy spent on finger pointing it feels like Kindergarten? I keep asking myself, in those last moments of life, what will we have to say to ourselves? Will it be, “I sure did spend a lot of time pointing fingers and telling them how they were wrong.” Or will it be, “I did everything in my power to take care of my planet?” (for videos and links head to the blog) added by: leahl

DIY: How to make a boat from reused bottles sail to Austrailia

David de Rothschild and Jo Royle dropped by Current HQ's to chat about their daring plans to sail from San Francisco to Sydney in a vessel made from plastic bottles as part of their mission to educate the world of the perils of plastic. In this excerpt of the interview, David and Jo geek out as they describe the unique features in their one of a kind (made from old plastic bottle) boat. You can watch more excerpts of the interview and the interview in it's entirety at current.com/plastiki. David de Rothschild authored The Global Warming Survival Handbook, hosts the Sundance Channel's “Eco-Trip: The Real Cost of Living”, where he investigates the life-cycle and ecological impact of everyday consumer products from field to shelf. He was also honored by National Geographic as an 'Emerging Explorer', The World Economic Forum named him a 'Young Global Leader', and in 2008 Clean Up The World made David an 'International Ambassador'. Jo Royle is internationally recognized as one of Europe's leading female ocean yachts skippers. Jo's passion for ocean adventure has launched her into a professional sailing career, her accolades include being one of the few sailors to have circumnavigated South Georgia in the Southern Ocean. She competed in the prestigious two‐handed trans‐ocean race, the Transat Jacques Vabre, skippering the only all female team in the 40‐foot class. She is currently completing an MSc in Environmental Science and Society at the University of Central London. added by: leahl

Meet the Plastiki Pirates: David de Rothschild and Jo Royle:

David de Rothschild and Jo Royle dropped by Current HQ's to chat about their daring plans to sail from San Francisco to Sydney in a vessel made from plastic bottles as part of their mission to educate the world of the perils of plastic. In this 3 minute excerpt of the interview, David and Jo describe their mission, and play stat attack on plastics. You can watch more excerpts of the interview and the interview in it's entirety at current.com/green. David de Rothschild authored The Global Warming Survival Handbook, hosts the Sundance Channel's “Eco-Trip: The Real Cost of Living”, where he investigates the life-cycle and ecological impact of everyday consumer products from field to shelf. He was also honored by National Geographic as an 'Emerging Explorer', The World Economic Forum named him a 'Young Global Leader', and in 2008 Clean Up The World made David an 'International Ambassador'. Jo Royle is internationally recognized as one of Europe's leading female ocean yachts skippers. Jo's passion for ocean adventure has launched her into a professional sailing career, her accolades include being one of the few sailors to have circumnavigated South Georgia in the Southern Ocean. She competed in the prestigious two‐handed trans‐ocean race, the Transat Jacques Vabre, skippering the only all female team in the 40‐foot class. She is currently completing an MSc in Environmental Science and Society at the University of Central London. added by: leahl

Jon Stewart on The O’Reilly Factor: Night Two

Night two of Jon Stewart on The O’Reilly Factor ! After last night’s light sparring we were ready for the main event. Jon Stewart was going to kill Fox News, or O’Reilly to kill Jon Stewart. WE WANTED BLOOD

More here:
Jon Stewart on The O’Reilly Factor: Night Two

Randi Zuckerberg is my Facebook Enemy of the Day

I hate Facebook. They market themselves as a place for you on the internet to connect with friends, yet they have shut me down 4 times randomly after I spend months building up my network of friends. They never bother emailing me back to explain why, or to discuss how we can bring my profile back to life, and the whole thing is some serious bullshit, possibly the same bullshit that has made the world sell their souls to the site and put there personal information on the shit like it was their own space to do that, only to get these freaks to read your messages, deleted your information and not even bother looking into it.

Read more here:
Randi Zuckerberg is my Facebook Enemy of the Day