Tag Archives: industry

T.I., Christina Aguilera Collabo Is ‘Amazing,’ Alex Da Kid Says

‘Castle Walls’ will serve as the next single off the rapper’s No Mercy , due out December 7. By James Dinh, with reporting by Tim Kash T.I. Photo: Moses Robinson/ WireImage Producer Alex Da Kid might be relatively new to the industry, but the British hitmaker has already proven that he can strike gold when bringing together artists of different musical genres. With production credits on summertime scorchers like “Airplanes” (B.o.B and Hayley Williams) and “Love the Way You Lie” (Eminem and Rihanna), the 27-year-old music mind reveals he’s now trying his hand with another duo: T.I. and Christina Aguilera. While on the American Music Awards red carpet, Kid spoke to MTV News about “Castle Walls,” the track he produced for the recently incarcerated rapper’s forthcoming album, which features the pop star. Not only did the producer reveal that the song is set to be the next single off Tip’s No Mercy , but he also gushed about how the song will grab a variety of listeners. “It’s going to be T.I.’s next single,” he told MTV News about the collabo. “I love it. I think it’s amazing. It’s my sound, just kind of an evolution of that. I think it’ll cater to a lot of different people.” A reported snippet of the track minus T.I. surfaced on the Internet a few weeks ago and finds Aguilera gently singing over a steady, mellow beat about the downfalls of loneliness: “Everyone thinks that I have it all/ But it’s so empty living behind these castle walls (These castle walls)/ If I should tumble if I should fall/ Would anyone hear me screaming behind these castle walls?/ There’s no one here at all, behind these castle walls.” “Castle Walls” isn’t the only star-studded effort on the MC’s new album. No Mercy will also feature appearances from Eminem, Kanye West, Chris Brown and The-Dream. The ATL rapper’s collaboration with Em, “All She Wrote,” leaked online last Tuesday. Are you excited for T.I. and Xtina’s collaboration? Share your thoughts! Related Artists T.I. Christina Aguilera

Read the rest here:
T.I., Christina Aguilera Collabo Is ‘Amazing,’ Alex Da Kid Says

Maine Residents Wary of Smart Meters, GE Pours $55 Million Into Start-Ups, and More Smart Grid News

Photo via mpeterke There’s quite a bit of news in the smart grid scene, and we’ve rounded up the most interesting stories. Check out the what’s what, from smart appliances taking over the industry to how much money the DOE is sending to new smart grid companies. … Read the full story on TreeHugger

See the original post here:
Maine Residents Wary of Smart Meters, GE Pours $55 Million Into Start-Ups, and More Smart Grid News

Sarah Palin Drops The H-Bomb: ‘Barack Hussein Obama’ (VIDEO)

Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin made headlines for suggesting in a TV interview she'd run for president in 2012 “if nobody else were to step up,” but little noticed in that segment was the one-time vice presidential nominee dropping President Obama's middle name. Palin (R) managed to suggest Obama has a shady past and use his middle name — as his critics often did during the 2008 campaign — all in one quick hit with Fox News' Greta Van Susteren. “Funny, Greta, we are learning more about Christine O'Donnell and her college years and her teenage years and her financial dealings than anybody ever even bothered to ask about Barack Hussein Obama as a candidate and now as our president,” Palin said. Palin added later that it is “fair to dig in somebody's past.” She said that if the “lamestream media” did do that digging voters would “find out their associates and beliefs and what formed their beliefs.” It's certainly not the first time Palin has cracked about Obama's past, but we couldn't find any references to her using his middle name. Who can forget that Palin was the candidate to insist that Obama doesn't see America in the same way as she and Sen. John McCain. added by: TimALoftis

World’s Largest Offshore Wind Farm Has Grand Opening Today

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/39324391/ns/us_news-environment/ Whopper of a wind farm opens off Britain World's largest offshore project has 100 turbines — so far Image: Wind turbines in Thames estuary Stefan Wermuth / Reuters Photo: A boat powering through the Thames estuary on Thursday provides perspective of just how big the wind turbines there are. msnbc.com staff and news service reports updated 9/23/2010 11:59:42 AM ET LONDON — The world's largest offshore wind farm had its grand opening Thursday — and its location on the estuary of the Thames River makes it a showcase for Britain's push to move beyond fossil fuels. So far, 100 wind turbines have been planted in waters up to 80 feet deep across the estuary in southern England. The idea is to produce enough electricity, 300 megawatts, to power the equivalent of 200,000 homes. Each turbine is nearly as tall as a 40-story building and the blades are at least 65 feet above the water for clearance with vessels. No turbine is closer than 1,600 feet to another and the entire “farm” covers an area of 22 square miles. Up to 341 turbines will be installed over the next four years. With Thursday's opening, which tops a 91-turbine farm off Denmark, Britain now has more offshore wind capacity than the rest of the world combined. “We are in a unique position to become a world leader in this industry,” British Energy and Climate Change Secretary Chris Huhne said in a statement before he attended the grand opening. “We are an island nation and I firmly believe we should be harnessing our wind, wave and tidal resources to the maximum.” Britain now gets three percent of its electricity from renewables but aims to get 15 percent by 2020. As part of that, the government this year awarded licenses to wind farm developers in a program that could deliver up to 32 gigawatts of generation capacity and require investment of more than $117 billion. Critics of the $1.4 billion wind farm include some nearby residents who object to the sight of the giant towers, some visible from shore. The farm starts about seven miles from shore. Environmental groups tend to back wind power as long as projects are not in areas of significant bird flight paths. The new wind farm met that standard. It's an “important stride forward,” said Craig Bennett of the British chapter of Friends of the Earth. But the group also wants Britain to guarantee funding of at least $3 billion a year for the recently created and government-funded Green Investment Bank, which aims to boost private-sector spending on low-carbon technology. “I know that there is still more to do to bring forward the large sums of investment we want to see in low-carbon energy in the U.K.,” Huhne said, “and we as government are committed to playing our part.” One embarrassment to the government is that only 20 percent of the investment in the new wind farm has gone to British firms. The farm is owned and operated by Swedish energy company Vattenfall, and the largest chunk of expenditure has been to Denmark's Vestas for the wind turbines. Global interest The promised vast expansion of Britain's offshore wind resources is proving to be a powerful lure for companies not normally associated with renewables but keen to generate eco-friendly and reliable sources of revenue. Engineers, consultants and oil rig makers around the world are setting up new divisions and partnerships in order to get a foothold in the market, which offers secure returns to those building and running the turbines. “It's attractive for a lot of companies that are looking for contracts,” said Ian Simm, chief executive of green fund firm Impax Asset Management, which has holdings in companies such as Vestas. “The fundamental point that makes it attractive is scale and government commitment, and the fact that industrial companies can learn the facts of success in one offshore environment and be able to transfer the majority, if not all, of those skills to other countries,” he said. However, clearer statements from the government on renewables incentives are still needed to support wind farm developers and really kick-start the market, according to Sarwjit Sambhi, managing director of power generation at Centrica, which has won the rights to develop up to 4.2 gigawatts of offshore windpower in the Irish Sea. “There is a general theme across this in that we haven't passed the tipping point yet where the industry is confident enough that there is a long-term pipeline of projects.” Britain's potential The Offshore Valuation Group, made up of government and industry organizations, estimates if Britain were to develop just 29 percent of its potential offshore resource, this could deliver 169 gigawatts of capacity by 2050 and turn Britain into a net exporter of electricity. This would involve installing 7.2 gigawatts a year — roughly equivalent to 1,000 7.5 megawatt turbines — with fixed offshore wind accounting for 5.4 gigawatts of the average annual build rate needed. The supply chain needed for this would have annual revenues of nearly $100 billion in 2050 and employ around 145,000 people directly, according to the Offshore Valuation report. As a result shipbuilders and companies that specialize in making oil rigs are also entering the wind market. SeaEnergy Executive Chairman Steve Remp, who has worked in the offshore oil and gas market for 30 years, expects the market for equipment vessels to take off at the beginning of 2012. “I foresee a sizeable industry evolving that calls on the engineering expertise in working offshore in deep water,” he said. Reuters and The Associated Press contributed to this report. added by: EthicalVegan

Golden Retriever Puppies eat boy ALIVE

Will nothing stop these cute and dangerous puppies from eating people or causing death from cuteness overload. added by: Mcellie

Republican Senator Richard Burr….The Big Government Corporatist!

Although this article excludes a ballot candidate, Libertarian Dr Mike Beitler. Who recently polled 10% and is making HUGE splashes in North Carolina: http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/PPP_Release_NC_706.pdf I still think it does a great job pointing out the corporatism that is inherent in our political system. What is worse, is most people don't realize how voting for their red and blue teams actually perpetuates and is a continuation of this corporate socialism process. BY ROB CHRISTENSEN AND DAVID RAYNOR – Staff writers Former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani was the star attraction at Shelly's Backroom, a scotch and cigar bar in downtown Washington, but the beneficiary was Republican Sen. Richard Burr. The reception last year attracted representatives from a cross section of corporate America: Fidelity Investments, TIAA-CREF, Ameriprise Financial, Hospital Corp. of America, Bayer, Murphy Oil and the American Chemistry Council. Each plunked down up to $2,500 for Burr's re-election kitty, campaign finance records show. Such events, repeated dozens of times since he took office in the Senate in 2005, demonstrate his clout both in business and in Washington, helping him amass a $9.1 million campaign war chest. Quantcast Burr heads into the fall campaign with a commanding financial advantage over his Democratic challenger, Secretary of State Elaine Marshall, having raised nine times as much as she. Even more striking, Burr had $6.2 million on hand compared to $163,195 for Marshall as of June 30, the last time the candidates were required to disclose campaign finances. Burr's campaign has been bankrolled largely by the business community. His donor list reads like a Dow Jones ticker. No member of Congress during this election cycle has received more money than Burr from individuals and political action committees affiliated with pharmaceutical companies, tobacco companies, business associations, foreign import automobile dealers, dentists and steel producers, according to the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics, which tracks congressional fundraising. Burr has received the second-highest amount of political donations of any member of Congress from the insurance industry, according to the center, and he's among the leading recipients of money from commercial banks, agribusiness and electric utilities. 'A level of trust' Burr said it was only natural for North Carolina's major industries to support him because he understands their issues. “There is a level of trust,” he said in a recent interview. Burr, who was a Winston-Salem sales executive for a wholesaler before entering politics, pointed out that his donations reflect North Carolina's workplace. “We are a state that is one of the largest manufacturers of pharmaceutical products and also a state of steel manufacturers,” he said, adding that political action committee donations “are a reflection of employee contributions on behalf of their company and their industry.” But Marshall has sought to portray Burr as a Washington insider and a tool of special interests during his 10 years in the House and nearly six years in the Senate. “He … has been there for 16 years,” Marshall said in an interview. “He has taken their contributions. He is beholden to them. He bailed out the Wall Street banks. He turned his back on hardworking North Carolinians.” Some of the most influential K Street lobbying firms hosted D.C. fundraisers for Burr's re-election campaign, according to invitations obtained by the Sunlight Foundation, a Washington nonprofit group that seeks to increase transparency in government. McBee Strategic Group and the BGR Group, both high-powered lobbying firms, even held fundraisers at their downtown Washington offices. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld held a reception at a D.C. steakhouse, and the Podesta Group hosted a breakfast at the Capitol Hill Club. Burr has been a key ally of business since his election to the U.S. House in 1994. That continued with his election to the Senate 10 years later. In his 2004 Senate race, he held at least 80 Washington fundraisers. This weekend, Burr was scheduled to hold a golf fundraiser at Pine Needles Lodge and Golf Course at Southern Pines at a cost of $1,500 for individuals and $2,500 for a PAC. Marshall, who has been secretary of state since 1996, has long had a reputation as an indifferent fundraiser, and her Senate campaign has done nothing to change that view. North Carolina trial lawyers, who contributed $73,000, are the only major identifiable group of Marshall donors, Federal Election Commission records say. But outside groups have helped her indirectly. Labor, environmental and liberal groups such as MoveOn.org, though not contributing to Marshall's campaign, have financed hundreds of thousands of dollars of anti-Burr TV commercials this summer. His total not unusual Although Burr's $9.1 million haul dwarfs Marshall's donations, the total is not extraordinary. Fifteen Senate candidates raised more than Burr in this election, led by Sen. John McCain with $26.7 million. In the 2008 Senate campaign in North Carolina, Republican Sen. Elizabeth Dole raised $17.4 million, compared with $8.9 million for her Democratic challenger, Kay Hagan. Burr's fundraising patterns are typical of most senators', said Dave Levinthal, a spokesman for the Center for Responsive Politics. “He is acting like a senator,” Levinthal said. “The system is set up so that the big money is in a few power centers. If you want to tap the big money, you go to D.C. or New York.” What's notable about Burr's fundraising, Levinthal said, is that 72 percent of his contributions came from North Carolina – a healthy slice of home-state gifts for a senator. He also noted that Burr's largest contributors tended to be major North Carolina employers such as Reynolds American, the Winston-Salem cigarette manufacturer, plus the Raleigh law firm Womble Carlyle and Charlotte-based Duke Energy. Burr has gone beyond the $9.1 million for his re-election campaign. He also pulled in $1.1 million for the Richard Burr Victory 2010 Committee to help the Republican Party get out the vote this fall. And he raised $379,496 for his Next Century Fund, which went to other congressional candidates. In April last year, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce raised about $43,000 for Burr from companies such as Wal-Mart Stores, Time-Warner, Duke Energy and Progress Energy. The chamber gave him a 100 percent rating in 2008 and an 87 percent rating in 2009. He votes for business “Sen. Burr has been a reliable vote for the business community on issues that create jobs,” said J.P. Fielder, a chamber spokesman. Burr voted with the chamber in opposing the Democrats' health care plan and opposing the Lily Ledbetter Pay Act to extend the period when discrimination claims can be made. He also voted against giving bankruptcy judges more authority to modify existing home mortgages, voting with the industry. Burr Health Professionals $428,229 Lawyers/law firms $411,799 Pharmaceuticals/ health products $398,733 Insurance $308,160 Lobbyists $297,843 Leadership PACs $279,818 Electric Utilities $269,425 Securities and investments $240,050 Real estate $229,700 Commercial Banks $212,682 Marshall Lawyers/law firms $166,555 Democratic/liberal groups $52,260 Women's issue groups $25,550 Educators $17,207 Tobacco $15,650 Health professionals $15,460 Real estate $15,050 Securities and investments $10,100 Industrial unions $10,000 Leadership PACs $10,000 Dr Mike Beitler ZERO DOLLARS IN SPECIAL INTEREST LOBBYIST FUNDS/Political Action Committees! Source: Center for Responsive Politics http://www.newsobserver.com/2010/09/19/690312/business-bolsters-burr-and-vice.ht… added by: shanklinmike

Kanye West Is Singing About Himself In ‘Runaway,’ Fans Say

MTV News asks Jay-Z and Eminem fans at Yankee Stadium what they thought of ‘Ye’s VMA performance. By Mawuse Ziegbe Kanye West performs during the 2010 MTV Video Music Awards Photo: Kevin Winter/Getty Images NEW YORK — Kanye West drops some choice insults in his latest song, which he debuted at Sunday’s MTV Video Music Awards . “I always find, yeah, I always find something wrong/ You been putting up with my sh– just way too long/ I’m so gifted at finding what I don’t like the most/ So I think it’s time for us to have a toast,” ‘Ye rhymes in “Runaway.” “Let’s have a toast for the douche bags!/ Let’s have a toast for the a–holes!/ Let’s have a toast for the scumbags!” The chorus has nods to an array of “bags,” however, fans believe the MC is, in a very un-hip-hop move, taking swipes at himself. MTV News caught up with a bunch of hip-hop heads at Jay-Z and Eminem’s Home and Home Tour stop at Yankee Stadium on Monday night (September 13), and many felt that Jigga’s “little brother” was using the track to air out his insecurities. “That was a funny song,” Steve Bananti said. “I liked the song a lot. It was good. I feel like he was making fun of himself.” Jamal Hairston said Yeezy’s lyrics reference “the stuff that he does” including the Taylor Swift 2009 VMA controversy . “I don’t think he was trying to insult [Swift]. I think it was self-deprecating. He was maybe talking about himself,” Hairston said, adding that the track is “a toast for the people who mess up.” “[He’s] trying to find some redemption, maybe.” Brian Bennett, who didn’t like the track, said ‘Ye was simply dropping insults for shock value. “I just thought that he was trying to get the crowd going crazy because he said the word ‘douche bag,’ ” he said. “I just feel like he was trying to get the crowd stirred.” Todd Read said he wasn’t feeling the track at first but might get into it after a few listens. “I’m a big Kanye fan but … I gotta hear the track un-performed. Maybe I’ll like it then. His music grows on me like that,” he said. Read, however, did enjoy West’s performance: “I liked to see him playing with the MPC and everything. I see he’s bringing it back to the real hip-hop roots, so I appreciated that.” Christian Contreras agreed that ‘Ye’s VMA set, which was low on props but big on impact, was another singular moment from the Chicago superstar. “I actually liked the song. I [liked] the whole performance; it was different. It’s definitely something that I wasn’t expecting, but Kanye always comes out of left field with everything,” he said. “The little toast to the douche bags, it’s cool.” Contreras speculated that ‘Ye’s track was not merely about how he feels, but rather how he’s been perceived by the media and fans alike. “All those names that he said — douche bag, a–hole, all that stuff — people have actually made that connection with him,” he observed. “I’m sure he got those names called to him a couple times. Maybe it was a little stab to the industry, talking about himself and how he’s changed.” What do you think Kanye West’s new song is about? Let us know in the comments! The Moonmen have all been handed out and the stars have gone home, but there’s plenty of MTV Video Music Awards news, interviews, behind-the-scenes scoop, party reports and more still to come, so keep it locked on MTVNews.com. Related Videos VMA 2010: Performances VMA 2010: Most Talked About Moments Related Photos VMA 2010: Performers Related Artists Kanye West

Read more here:
Kanye West Is Singing About Himself In ‘Runaway,’ Fans Say

Lady Gaga’s VMA Outfits: Fashion Week Attendees Weigh In

‘She is like a work of art!’ ‘Behind the Velvet Ropes’ hostess Lauren Ezersky says. By Christopher MacAllister Lady Gaga at the 2010 MTV Video Music Awards Photo: WireImage NEW YORK — Even though Lady Gaga managed to cut down her costume changes from last year’s Video Music Awards to just three for the 2010 Video Music Awards , they still sparked the interest of many who turned up and tuned in. We asked the opinions some New York Fashion Week attendees which of the three costumes was their favorite. Lisa Liu perceived her arrival outfit , designed by Alexander McQueen, as “her tamest outfit of the evening. But I thought it looked very Lady Gaga.” Becky Boudwyn described her as “an out-of-control couture Pocahontas.” “Behind the Velvet Ropes” hostess Lauren Ezersky said, “She is like a work of art! When I look at her, it’s almost like looking at a painting by an old master. … When you look at her, you can’t just look once, there’s always something else to see! I love her first outfit, I just love it!” This dress was seen as the favorite by many, including Chris Futrell, who praised the fact that it was “very detailed oriented.” When we brought up outfit number two , people were not afraid to mention the fact that Gaga could barely walk in it. It was praised by Teasea and Duane Bennett as being “quite exquisite” and “very gothic,” but was disliked by fashion stylist Celine Griscom, who described it as “slightly dumpy … doesn’t have enough leanness to it,” and Ayoka Lucas, who said, “It’s not flattering to her body at all, unfortunately!” The third and final dress, the controversial meat dress , definitely left a bad taste in people’s mouths as reactions were unified in perceiving this dress as “something different and something you would not see at an awards show such as the VMAs” (Chris Futrell). Lauren Ezersky praised the dress, joking that “She’s cookin! In fact, she needs to cook! … I love the look of it, but I’m not quite sure if I would want to sit next to her! How would they bring that to her? Like, in a freezer!? I don’t know! I think it’s totally cool! You go, girl!” The speculation about whether or not it was real meat was not lost on Lisa Liu, who noticed that no one was “shy to hug her so I wasn’t sure if it was real meat.” Most people shared the opinion of Teasea Bennett, who said, “I think she was able to pull it off. I wasn’t too fond of that one, to be honest, but it suited her! I think it suited Gaga. She can pull anything off! Even a bag, a plain plastic bag, she’d rock that!” Lauren Ezersky summarized her opinion of Gaga’s fashion choices, saying, “She gives young people inspiration that it’s OK to be different, it’s OK to look the way you want to look.” And in relation to the recent passing of Alexander McQueen, the designer of the first two dresses, Ezersky pointed out, “It was a beautiful homage to him because we all really miss him in this industry. I got to meet him one time and he was an amazing artistic genius. … She will bring out the new Alexander McQueen. She’ll find them and wear them.” The Moonmen have all been handed out and the stars have gone home, but there’s plenty of 2010 MTV Video Music Awards news, interviews, behind-the-scenes scoop, party reports and more still to come, so keep it locked on MTVNews.com. Related Videos VMA All Access VMA 2010: Most Talked About Moments Related Photos VMA 2010: Full Fashion Recap VMA 2010: Lady Gaga Lookbook | MTV Style Related Artists Lady Gaga

Read this article:
Lady Gaga’s VMA Outfits: Fashion Week Attendees Weigh In

China to Have 200+ Million Cars by 2020!

Photo: Flickr , CC Serious Environmental Issues Foreseen

View post:
China to Have 200+ Million Cars by 2020!

NYT Tees Up DNC Talking Points With Ethically Questionable Piece on Boehner’s Lobbyist Ties

The New York Times’s lobbyist double standard lives on. Since Barack Obama became president, the paper has routinely overlooked the vast disconnect between his rhetoric on lobbying’s role on the political process – there really isn’t one, if you believe Barack – and his actions on the issue. But while the Gray Lady all but ignores Obama’s deep ties with lobbyists and the industry groups they represent, the paper has hammered Republicans for their ties to “special interests.” The latest such attempt is a hack job in Sunday’s New York Times. Reporter Eric Lipton claims that House Miniority Leader John Boehner “maintains especially tight ties with a circle of lobbyists and former aides representing some of the nation’s biggest businesses, including Goldman Sachs, Google, Citigroup, R. J. Reynolds, MillerCoors and UPS.” The story makes some serious allegations – the most damning of which was sourced to an anonymous lobbyist. Intriguingly, some of the same claims undergird an upcoming DNC ad blitz against Boehner. The Leader’s staff, meanwhile, claim they were not asked for comment before the story went to press. Byron York reported Saturday: Boehner spokesman Michael Steel says he received a fact-checking email from Times reporter Eric Lipton Friday evening asking if Boehner did in fact oppose the cap on greenhouse gases, the tax change for hedge fund executives, the debit card fee cap, and increased fees on oil and gas companies. “Yes, that is correct,” Steel responded to Lipton, adding “I can tell you why, if you care.” Steel says he received no further notes from Lipton. Steel says Boehner has long held those positions and does not hold them as a result of lobbying. Hours after the email exchange, the Times story was published online, with the statement from the lobbyist that he had “won” Boehner’s backing on those matters. After Boehner’s aides complained, the paragraph was changed to read, emphasis added: One lobbyist in the club — after lauding each staff member in Mr. Boehner’s office that he routinely calls to ask for help — ticked off the list of recent issues for which he had sought the lawmaker’s backing: combating fee increases for the oil industry, fighting a proposed cap on debit card fees, protecting tax breaks for hedge fund executives and opposing a cap on greenhouse gas emissions. Mr. Boehner’s office said these were positions he already agreed with. The statement that a lobbyist “won” Boehner’s backing was changed to one in which a lobbyist “sought” Boehner’s backing. That’s a rather critical change. The Times also added Boehner’s defense that these were long-held positions. To call Boehner’s aides angry at the account would be an understatement. “They were offered the opportunity to find out if this was true, and they chose to rely instead on the word of an anonymous lobbyist,” says spokesman Michael Steel. “They intentionally refused to get the information to prove that this allegation was false.” That allegation itself is pretty serious. But it would hardly be out of step for a paper that has previously sought to demonize Republicans’ relationships with lobbyists in either complete ignorance of or contradictory to the facts. Remember Vicki Iseman? The New York Times suggested in a February 2008 article that Iseman, then a lobbyist with Alcalde & Fay, had a romantic relationship with then-presidential candidate John McCain. Not a shred of evidence was offered to support the allegation, and the Times later printed a correction claiming it had no intention of making that suggestion. If making baseless accusations against Republicans and their relationships with lobbyists were not sordid enough, the Times has also made a habit of blindly accepting any claim made by President Obama regarding ethics and lobbying at simple face value. Here’s a sampling of Times headlines since 2008: On First Day, Obama Quickly Sets a New Tone Obama’s Transition Team Restricts Lobbyists’ Role Victory for Obama Over Military Lobby ‘All Kinds of Yelling’ Expected From Obama’s Lobbyist Crackdown Obama Returns Lobbyist’s Donations Obama Issues Sharp Call for Reforms on Wall Street White House, Lobbyists Still at Odds The President Orders Transparency The Times does occasionally run watered-down, statistic-ridden pieces such as “As Donors, Lobbyists Often Favor One Party” (since it’s not in the headline, I’ll bet you can guess which party). But neither the immeasurable hypocrisy of this administration’s rhetoric on “special interests” nor the administration’s ties to those special interests are explored in any detail. So when President Obama claimed that he had “excluded lobbyists from policymaking jobs” despite the 50 lobbyists he employed (and continues to employ) in policymaking jobs, the Times failed to note any disconnect. Instead, the paper ran a story claiming Obama’s new lobbyist rules would “revolutionize how lobbyists disclose their activities and contribute money to candidates for federal office.” Beyond simply ignoring the specific hypocrisies in Obama’s rhetoric, the Times has taken a see-no-evil approach to the president’s extensive ties to the largest industry groups, while trumpeting relationships between Republicans and “special interests.” The pattern was on full display this summer, when the Times had to be reminded that Obama received seven times as much in campaign contributions from Goldman Sachs as George W. Bush did from Enron. Yet while the Times had vaguely alleged some sort of unethical relationship between the defunct energy company and the Bush administration, it made no such suggestions concerning Goldman. Given its history, the Times’s approach to the Boehner story is, though underhanded, hardly shocking. The agenda in its coverage of lobbyists and lawmakers is quite clear. And given the Times’s clear willingness to toe the Democratic line on this issue, it’s worth pondering this interesting chain of events. Just this past week, President Obama began directing his ire towards congressional Republicans, and Boehner specifically. Mere days later, as Yid With Lid notes , the Times also took up that line of attack. Then, Sunday morning, as NewsBusters reported , White House press secretary Robert Gibbs tweeted a series of quotes from and laudatory remarks about the Times piece, from the official Twitter feed of the White House press office. The Times’s piece also plays pefectly into the DNC’s election strategy. In fact, it kicks off a week in which Democrats are hoping to paint Boehner, well, exactly as he is painted by the Times piece. A DNC official told Talking Points Memo : We are going to tell Americans exactly who he is: a special interest and lobbyist loving typical Washington politician who always puts the well heeled and well-to-do ahead of middle class families and small businesses and who would, if he became speaker, return the capitol to the anything goes, DeLay-Abramoff days and ways of doing business.  So the Times blasted Boehner in the Sunday paper with a line of attack taken up by President Obama last week and touted by the White House the morning of its publication, and teed up a week of Boehner-bashing by offering the laughable veil of objectivity to de facto Democratic talking points. Ladies and gentlemen, I give you the mainstream media.

View post:
NYT Tees Up DNC Talking Points With Ethically Questionable Piece on Boehner’s Lobbyist Ties