Tag Archives: interview

Web Magazine Accused of Forging Stephen Colbert Interview

It is the kind of story that Stephen Colbert would likely lampoon on his Comedy Central talk show: Online literary magazine reaches out for an interview with a political figure, does not hear back from said political figure, and creates a nine-page interview transcript of an interview with the political figure, hoping that he never finds out. Only this time, the story pits Stephen Colbert as the victim and Wag’s Revue as the accused literary party. Click through for the non-explanation Revue offers its accusers.

See original here:
Web Magazine Accused of Forging Stephen Colbert Interview

CNN Sides Heavily With Opponents of Proposition 8

On Wednesday, CNN’s daytime coverage of a federal judge’s decision on California’s Proposition 8 leaned mostly towards those who opposed the voter-approved amendment to the state’s constitution, which banned same-sex marriage. When the judge’s ruling was released, which found Prop 8 to be unconstitutional, the network went so far to get immediate reaction to the ruling at a “gay” bar in West Hollywood . Don Lemon was the first CNN anchor to bring on guests on the issue 15 minutes into the 12 noon Eastern hour, none other than Gary Spino and Tony Brown, the two subjects of their pro-homosexual parenting documentary ” Gary and Tony Have a Baby .” Minutes before the two appeared, the network replayed a glowing report by senior political analyst Gloria Borger , which originally aired on June 16, profiling Ted Olson and David Boies who are fighting to overturn Prop 8. Lemon began his interview of the same-sex couple with a softball question: “So listen, Gary, I want to get you in here. Are you- h ow are you guys feeling? Are you anxiously awaiting this judge’s decision, or what- is it just something that’s in the back of your minds now? ” He asked a similar question of Brown: ” Are you feeling anxiety about this? ” Later in the interview, the CNN anchor did propose some tougher questions: “Well, Tony, the opposition says seven million people in California- seven million citizens, voters- voted for Proposition 8, which was against gay marriage. So why go against the wishes of the voters? ” Lemon even closed the interview by bringing up one of the motivating factors of those who are against same-sex marriage. Spino actually answered this question very candidly: LEMON: Gary, with anything, there is compromise- with anything. Do you see the other side? Do you see the fear? Do you understand that some people have been brought up a certain way and have certain religious beliefs, and may necessarily- may not necessarily go along with your lifestyle and the lifestyle of millions of Americans around the country, and believe that gay marriage should not be legal? SPINO: Well, here’s my thought on the subject- religion is learned. I was born this way, so I don’t have a lot of patience for that, because you’re basically taught what your parents or your grandparents- it’s a learned thing. But- you know, I was born this way. You’re not born with religion . Eight minutes later, the CNN anchor brought on Tony Perkins of the social conservative organization the Family Research Council. By contrast, Lemon didn’t wait long to become confrontational with his guest, starting with his second question: LEMON: So, I’ll ask you the other side. The people who are for same-sex marriage, who don’t want Proposition 8, would say, what’s wrong with that, if it is what the- if it is upholding the Constitution? What’s wrong with that? PERKINS: Well, first off, there is nothing in the Constitution under civil rights. Civil rights was put into the Constitution based upon racial equality, which, by the way, was adopted by the states. It was done the right way. Now, you- there’s no way you can convince anyone that 100 years ago, when that amendment was adopted, that that pertained to someone’s sexual behavior. There’s no way to make that case. I think this is- LEMON: All men are created equal, endowed by the rights of their creator? PERKINS: …[I]f you look at the 10th Amendment, unless the Constitution speaks specifically to an issue, it’s reserved to the states, and that’s exactly what California did, and that’s exactly what California’s court upheld, that the right- that the people had the right to, in fact, defend the definition of marriage. That’s what they did. This is another approach. LEMON: Okay. The reason I said all men are created equal- and we can go on. We can talk about the 14th Amendment. That’s been debated. Some people want to change it now when it- talking about it when it comes to immigration. But if two people who want to be together think- feel that they should have the same rights as the people next door who are heterosexual- under the American Constitution, regardless of what you believe about religion or about sex, or what have you, what is wrong with those two people abiding by the Constitution- paying taxes- having the same rights under our Constitution as everyone else? What is wrong with that? What is the argument against that? PERKINS: Well, Don, that’s a good question, because, actually- you know, two people do not have those rights. Under the Constitution- LEMON: Well, heterosexual or straight people do have those rights. PERKINS: No, they don’t. You don’t have- two people don’t have the right to marry whoever they want. There are restrictions. The states- this is an issue reserved to the states. Lemon spent the rest of the interview pressing his guest with this pro-same-sex “marriage” argument. Just under four hours later, 10 minutes into the 4 pm Eastern hour of CNN’s Rick’s List, correspondent Dan Simon, reporting live from outside the federal courthouse in San Francisco where the Prop 8 ruling was decided, interviewed Shelly Bailes and Ellen Pontac, a “married” lesbian couple who were opposed to Proposition 8. Simon led his interview by repeating the argument of the pro-Prop 8 side that “will of the majority has the right to decide this issue” and asked them for their take on this, but followed up with two softball questions: ” When you got married a couple of years ago, explain how that changed the dynamic of your relationship .” He then asked, ” We know this is just one stop- that, ultimately, it’s going to go to the appeals court, and then to the Supreme Court. But today- how important is today to you? What’s going through your mind? ” Later that hour, anchor Rick Sanchez read Tweets from four opponents of Prop 8, including lesbian TV host Ellen DeGeneres and Democratic Congressman Mike Quigley, with none from the opposing side [see right]. The decision from federal judge Vaughn Walker came down that hour, and CNN saw it fit to send correspondent Ted Rowlands to “The Abbey,” a “gay” bar in West Hollywood, California, whose slogan is ” 20 years and still raising the gay bar ,” as he noted during his live reporting. After Judge Walker’s ruling came out, Rowlands interviewed some of the bar’s clientele, who, as he earlier admitted, have “a vested interest” with the issue. As you might expect, all of those interviewed by the CNN correspondent applauded the ruling [see video of the report from Real Clear Politics ]. ROWLANDS: We’re at The Abbey, which is an institution- a gay bar that’s been around for 20 years , and people here are just starting to get the word. Your initial reaction? We were talking earlier about this whole thing, and now that it’s come down, what do you think? UNIDENTIFIED MALE: I think it’s excellent. It’s an overruling of an overruling. It’s back to where the law should be. I think it’s a gay issue, and I think- I know everywhere in the world- everyone in this country can vote, but I think it’s a gay issue, and I think that heterosexual people should defer to the homosexual population, and say, what do you guys want to do? And that’s what we want to do, so- ROWLANDS: All right. Well, I don’t know that that will ever happen, but everybody will have a vote. These folks have just found out the news as well. You’re from San Francisco. Your thoughts? UNIDENTIFIED MALE: I think it’s great- you know, the more we can do to get marriage recognized legally- equality, the more we can do for equality on a legal level- on a federal level, is great. So, as this goes forward, I hope it just gets better. ROWLANDS: A lot of same-sex couples, obviously, in this area of Los Angeles, Rick, and so there’s a lot of interest in this area. Your thoughts? A lot of people have been talking- a lot of people were very pessimistic, Rick, before we got this decision. But- boy, at this time, it looks like the federal courts, at least, agree with the idea of same-sex marriage, or, at least, agree that it should not be banned by the state of California . UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Right. No, it’s huge. I’m super-excited. It’s a step in the right direction- like, we just need to keep moving forward with it. I mean, it shouldn’t even be an issue, and the fact we have to have these conversations are sad, but this is really great news. ROWLANDS: All right- initial reaction, Rick- it’s a bit tempered, as we talked about before. Everybody is well aware of the fact that this is the first step in a long process, likely going to the Supreme Court. But you can bet there will be a lot of celebrating here, right in this area, at least tonight as word travels . During The Situation Room, CNN went live to speeches during the 5 pm Eastern hour by Chad Griffin of the American Foundation for Equal Rights, one of the plaintiffs in the case arguing against Proposition 8, and Ted Olsen himself, both of whom praised Judge Walker’s decision. Perkins returned for a second interview, this time by anchor Wolf Blitzer, during the 6 pm Eastern hour. Blitzer was far less confrontational with the FRC president during the segment than his colleague Lemon. A transcript of his questions on the issue: BLITZER: Let’s get some reaction now from Tony Perkins- he’s president of the Family Research Council. He’s joining us on the phone- not a good day for what you stand for, Tony. Tell us your immediate reaction- what happens now? … BLITZER: So, obviously, you are going to see what happens in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. That’s considered, as you well know, a pretty liberal court of appeals. So eventually, though, it will get up to the Supreme Court. I guess you agree with that? PERKINS: Yeah, I don’t think there’s any question that it’s going to end up in the Supreme Court. Look, Ted Olson is a very smart guy- probably one of the best constitutional lawyers in the country- BLITZER: And he is a conservative Republican?… BLITZER: But you assume [that] the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals will uphold the district court’s decision today?… BLITZER: We’re just getting in, Tony, a statement from the White House . The spokesman there issuing this statement on behalf of the White House- I’ll read it to you and to our viewers: ‘ The President has spoken out in opposition to Proposition 8, because it is divisive and discriminatory. He will continue to promote equality for LGBT Americans’- lesbians, gays, bisexuals, trans-gender Americans. You got a problem with that White House reaction? … Throughout the day, CNN’s on-screen graphics also indicated the network’s slant towards same-sex “marriage.” The homosexual activist movement’s rainbow flag was featured prominently throughout the day (see screen cap above). Also, prior to the ruling, CNN.com’s article on the judge’s decision featured a photo of an anti-Prop 8 sign (see right). Overall, CNN’s Wednesday coverage of the court decision is a continuation of their pro-homosexual agenda segments from earlier in June when they were promoting their “Gary and Tony Have a Baby” documentary.

Excerpt from:
CNN Sides Heavily With Opponents of Proposition 8

Matthews Whacked Fox for Being ‘Stooges’ for Senate Candidates, But What About MSNBC’s Senate Shilling?

On Tuesday night’s Hardball, Chris Matthews theorized (confessing he didn’t really have evidence) that GOP candidates like Sharron Angle get to pre-screen their questions before appearing on Fox News. He concluded: “How far will these candidates go in expecting the networks, especially Fox in the case of the right wing, to do their bidding and set them up as basically stooges, asking pre-arranged questions, pre-arranged answers?” Matthews mocked Angle’s chutzpah that interviews should be fundraising opportunities. It’s a little mysterious that MSNBC would get on a high horse for offering repeated bites at the publicity apple for Senate candidates. Take the case of Bill Halter, the staunch leftist who challenged Sen. Blanche Lincoln (D.-Ark.) in a primary for not supporting a socialist “public option” in the health-care debate. From March through the June 8 primary, MSNBC hosted Halter in ten interviews (on programs included in the Nexis transcript database), including seven on The Ed Show, one on The Rachel Maddow Show (on March 3), one on Hardball (on March 12), one on Andrea Mitchell Reports on primary day (June 8).  Don’t like candidates repeating their websites on air, MSNBC? Halter did on the Ed Show. Here’s May 19:  SCHULTZ: Governor, you have gotten the grass roots support, I mean overwhelming compared to your opponent. Is it going to be there between now and June 8th? Can you count on the same people that got you close last night to close the deal for you? HALTER: Well, Ed, I`m just going to ask them right now. Go to billhalter.com. Our average contribution has been $30. That`s something that people across Arkansas and across the United States can do, and I can guarantee you this, we`re going to put that money to good use. Actually, it happened again on that night:  SCHULTZ: Adam, what if the progressive movement in this country can`t pull it off in Arkansas? Would this be a big setback? Because I see this as a real turning point right here. I mean, she is the first corporate Democratic senator that fought hard against health care reform. I don`t think she held insurance`s feet to the fire at all. If she is successful, is that a real blow to the progressive movement? ADAM GREEN: Sure. Any loss would be a blow to any movement. But we`re going to win, and here`s why we`re going to win. One by-product of the fact that she has taken millions and millions of dollars from big corporations is that she really has no grassroots support here on the ground. You can feel it. Meanwhile, thousands of thousands of people are chipping in with their time and their money to Bill Halter, either at BillHalter.com or on our website, BoldProgressives.org. Halter also did two website plugs on the Ed Show of May 24:  SCHULTZ: The latest Research 2000 poll shows you were slightly ahead of the Senator, 48-46. Is it going to be this close all the way? What do you think? HALTER: I think it will be close, but I believe that we`re headed for a victory on June 8th. Certainly, we have all the momentum, Ed. We`ve seen that all over the state. SCHULTZ: Do you have the money? HALTER: We can always use help, Ed. BillHalter.com for anybody who wants to help out. SCHULTZ: But right now do you have the money? HALTER: Well, we`ve got enough to get our ads up, but we can always use more. SCHULTZ: Well, what about her war chest? She doesn`t seem to have the grassroots the way you do. HALTER: No, that`s true. But she`s had six years to raise money, and so she banked over $8 million. We`ve out-raised Senator Lincoln ever since we got in the race, but she just had a big head start. Of course, she spent a lot of that money, too. But we could use everybody`s help, $10, $20, $30. BillHalter.com is the place to go . The Ed Show dates for Halter were March 2, March 5, March 31, May 14, May 19, May 24, and June 2.  But Matthews called Sharron Angle’s grinning insistence to Cameron on fundraising plugs in her interviews as “the most incredible 26 seconds of television history for a very long time.” That’s obviously a very slanted lesson in TV history.

See the rest here:
Matthews Whacked Fox for Being ‘Stooges’ for Senate Candidates, But What About MSNBC’s Senate Shilling?

CBS and ABC Wish Obama Happy Birthday: Still ‘Full of Energy,’ But Feeling ‘Weight of the Presidency’

Playing Stevie Wonder’s version of ‘Happy Birthday’ at the end of Wednesday’s CBS Early Show, co-host Erica Hill reported: “The Obamas, of course, big Stevie Wonder fans. And President Obama, 49 years old today.” After she observed that Obama looked a little grayer, co-host Harry Smith, who interviewed the President on Friday, chimed in: “He came bounding into the interview area full of energy.” Smith went on to note how “in terms of energy and sort of lines on the face or any of that other kind of stuff….looks like [Obama’s] still got it together.” Hill wondered: “He doesn’t look tired or drawn or stressed?” Smith replied, “No, no. Nope,” and started to joke about his own age: “[Obama] was probably very happy to see me….Because Lord knows, everybody likes it when they see the old- ” At that point, weatherman Dave Price interjected: “But keep in mind, you really never notice it until you see those pictures.” He added: “…the only one who really came out looking just like he did was Reagan….left looking great.” Smith couldn’t resist getting in a quick shot at the late president: “…they insisted till the end that he never dyed his hair.” Back in 2001, Early Show news reader Melissa McDermott offered only a dry, three-sentence news brief on President George W. Bush’s 55th birthday: “Well, today is President Bush’s 55th birthday. Mr. and Mrs. Bush arrived in Maine yesterday to celebrate with family and friends at the family’s home in Kennebunkport, Maine. The White House says his only goals for the day are to make an early tee time and shoot a low score.” In 2002, Tracy Smith and Mark Knoller added a couple extra lines to a nearly identical brief: TRACY SMITH: All right, Mark. Now it is the president’s 56th birthday today, so how’s he celebrating? KNOLLER: Well, he’s celebrating it with his family at the family home here at Kennebunkport, Maine. The president and his dad were up early this morning, teeing off for a round of golf at just after 6 AM. There’ll be a birthday party by the family for the president this evening. We’re told there will be birthday cake and singing. SMITH: Yum. All right. Thanks, Mark. There was no birthday music or discussion of Bush’s energy level and hair color. The Early Show wasn’t the only network morning show to send Obama a special birthday message on Wednesday, ABC’s Good Morning America had a similar segment. With ‘They say it’s your birthday!’ playing in the background, co-host Robin Roberts announced: “…the President of the United States is celebrating his 49th birthday today.” A headline on-screen read: “Happy Birthday, Mr. President: Has White House Aged Obama?” Correspondent Yunji de Nies reported: “It’s the President’s birthday. And apparently, he’s been feeling his age….It was just 18 months ago that the vibrant 47-year-old took the oath.” A clip was played of de Nies fretting over the President’s aging to Press Secretary Robert Gibbs: “Does he feel like the weight of the presidency is, perhaps, accelerating his aging?” She explained: “This president isn’t unique. Bill Clinton entered a fresh-faced baby-boomer and emerged mature. Eight years weren’t easy an George W. Bush, either. And take a look at Abraham Lincoln. No matter the century, the Oval Office takes its toll.” De Nies went so far as to ask Dr. Michael Roizen of the Wellness Institute at the Cleveland Clinic, “What’s the best advice on his birthday? How can he stay young?” Roizen replied: “Keep playing basketball. And make sure he makes time for family time.” Here is a transcript of the August 4 Early Show segment: 8:51AM [SONG: Happy birthday to you] ERICA HILL: A little Stevie Wonder Happy Birthday for you. The Obamas, of course, big Stevie Wonder fans. And President Obama, 49 years old today. HARRY SMITH: You really tied it all together there. HILL: I just – I just tied it up with a bow for you on a birthday gift. DAVE PRICE: Thank you Casey Kasem. HILL: Any time. Your top 40- DAVE PRICE: How about a long distance dedication? HILL: Oh, coming up a little later in the show. So, it’s President Obama’s birthday today. He’s heading home to Chicago to celebrate tonight. Of course, Mrs. Obama and Sasha are in Spain, Malia’s at camp. He’s hanging out with friends in Chicago. I got to ask you, Harry, he’s looks a little gray, but other than that, you just interviewed him last week- SMITH: It was on Friday. He came bounding into the interview area full of energy. That is the most telling thing, is – he really is grayer, without question, grayer, but in terms of energy and sort of lines on the face or any of that other kind of stuff, we’ve seen over the years what being in the White House can do to a president. HILL: What it does. SMITH: And he looks like he’s- HILL: Even his face? SMITH: -at least overtly, looks like he’s still got it together. HILL: He doesn’t look tired or drawn or stressed? SMITH: No, no. Nope, he was – well, he was probably very happy to see me- JEFF GLOR: Of course, of course. SMITH: Because Lord knows, everybody likes it when they see the old- PRICE: But keep in mind, you really never notice it until you see those pictures one, two – I mean, look at Carter. You know, the only one who really came out looking just like he did was Reagan. He went into the office, you know, being relatively senior, and left the same. And left looking great. SMITH: And you know, PRICE: Right. GLOR: Of course not.         HILL: I have no comment. GLOR: Reagan always looked great. HILL: Hey, have a great day, everyone. If it’s your birthday, happy birthday to you as well. Stay tuned, your local news is next.        Here is a full transcript of the Good Morning America segment: 7:49AM ROBIN ROBERTS [singing] They say it’s your birthday! Around the water cooler this morning, nine days before Sam celebrates his birthday, the President of the United States is celebrating his 49th birthday today. ABC GRAPHIC: Happy Birthday, Mr. President: Has White House Aged Obama? GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: Sam’s only going to be 34. SAM CHAMPION: No, we’re oddly the same age. But, I do love you for that, George. ROBERTS: See how close you were to becoming the President of the United States. But, he’s on his own, Barack Obama is, today. He’s in Chicago, because Malia is at sleep away camp. Michelle is with Ms. Obama on vacation in- STEPHANOPOULOS: Spain. ROBERTS: in Spain. And, so, he’ll have a celebratory dinner we’re the boys, with his friends in Chicago tonight. Yunji de Nies decided to take a look, because this is his second birthday in office, to see how the two years have treated him. YUNJI DE NIES: It’s the President’s birthday. And apparently, he’s been feeling his age. BARACK OBAMA [montage]: I have a lot more gray hair than I did last year. I don’t have as much gray hair in that clip. [At a Subway] I want everybody to know when I was 20, I could order a 12-inch. I’m turning 49 next week, which means I need just the half. DE NIES: It was just 18 months ago that the vibrant 47-year-old took the oath. OBAMA: So, help me, God. DE NIES: As months grow, so do the grays. [At a press conference.] Does he feel like the weight of the presidency is, perhaps, accelerating his aging? ROBERT GIBBS: I can’t imagine that the weight of the job doesn’t take a toll. It will just require that he get more frequent hair cuts. DE NIES: This president isn’t unique. Bill Clinton entered a fresh-faced baby-boomer and emerged mature. Eight years weren’t easy an George W. Bush, either. And take a look at Abraham Lincoln. No matter the century, the Oval Office takes its toll. DR. MICHAEL ROIZEN (Wellness Institute at the Cleveland Clinic): We looked at all the presidents and the typical one ages two years for every year they’re in office. DE NIES: Using Aprilage Facial Progression Software, we got a glimpse of what the President might look like after one term in office. And then, after two. What’s the best advice on his birthday? How can he stay young? ROIZEN: Keep playing basketball. And make sure he makes time for family time. DE NIES: For Good Morning America, Yunji de Nies, ABC News, the White House. ROBERTS: I think our stage manager, Angie, said it’s all the secrets they know as president. You think you know what’s going on in the world. But, once you become president and you open up the docket and you go- STEPHANOPOULOS: oh, my god. JUJU CHANG: I have to settle that now. STEPHANOPOULOS: Our gift will be, we’ll send him a case of Grecian Formula 16.

Read more:
CBS and ABC Wish Obama Happy Birthday: Still ‘Full of Energy,’ But Feeling ‘Weight of the Presidency’

Did Dr. Dre Know Detox Would Take This Long? ‘Absolutely Not’

‘I thought it would take, at worst case, a couple of years,’ he tells Vibe for his cover story with Eminem. By Hillary Crosley Eminem and Dr. Dre on the cover of Vibe Photo: Vibe While Eminem talked about death and Brittany Murphy in his interview for the Vibe “Juice” issue, Dr. Dre delved into his Detox delay , the “Under Pressure” leak and rumors of an instrumental album. The Eminem and Dr. Dre cover of Vibe ‘s 15th-anniversary “Juice” issue is a nod to their original appearance in the mag eight years ago. The issue hits newsstands August 16, and Dre began by answering the question on many fans’ minds: Did he know Detox would take this long? “Absolutely not. I thought it would take, at worst case, a couple of years,” the super-producer said. “For example, actual work time on The Chronic was nine months, and actual work time on my last album, 2001, was about 10 months. The actual work time on this album is about half of that, where I’m seriously focusing on it. There is always something coming up. Like signing talent, old and new.” The California icon also talked about the recent leak of his duet with Jay-Z, “Under Pressure.” “[That] was a little bit more frustrating, because at least ‘Crack a Bottle’ had a hook on it,” Dre said of a previous leak. “I wouldn’t be as mad at a leak if the song was done. “I’m not mad at the fans,” he continued. “I’m mad at the person that leaked the sh–. I have no idea how it got out. It’s not even worth looking to see who did it. It happens. The most painful part about it is that I’m passionate about what I do, so people should hear it in the right form. Somebody actually hacked into our e-mails, so that made our red flags go up. We’re in a new age, and that’s a sign: ‘Wake up, mother—-er. You have to be more careful with your sh–.’ That’s all there is to it. I know what’s up now.” As for an album of instrumentals, Dre said it’s definitely on deck. “Oh, yeah, that’s in the works,” he said. “An instrumental album is something I’ve been wanting to do for a long time. I have the ideas for it. I want to call it The Planets. I don’t even know if I should be saying this, but f— it. [ Laughs. ] It’s just my interpretation of what each planet sounds like. I’m gonna go off on that. Just all instrumental. I’ve been studying the planets and learning the personalities of each planet. I’ve been doing this for about two years now, just in my spare time, so to speak. I wanna do it in surround sound. It’ll have to be in surround sound for Saturn to work.” What are you expecting from Dr. Dre’s new material? Share your thoughts in the comments! Related Artists Dr. Dre Eminem

Original post:
Did Dr. Dre Know Detox Would Take This Long? ‘Absolutely Not’

Meet the Bodybuilding Neo-Nazi Porn Star Who Embalms Dead People for a Living [Interview]

The internet is full of strange people. Corinna Burt may be the strangest. The prominent white supremacist is an undertaker, bodybuilder, and former torture porn star. By phone, she discussed her unusual life and how racism “saved her” from porn. More

NBC’s Today Show Inaccurately Blames Fox News for Sherrod Firing

On Wednesday’s Today show, Matt Lauer, Ann Curry and Savannah Guthrie left the impression that Fox News’s criticism of Shirley Sherrod was the reason she lost her job at the Agriculture Department, with Lauer, in his interview with Sherrod, charging: “I don’t know who to blame here, Miss Sherrod. I mean the, the, the activist who put forward this garbage in the first place has an agenda. We shouldn’t be surprised by that. The cable news network that, that played this garbage on and on and talked about it, has an agenda. We shouldn’t be surprised by that.” But Lauer and NBC News, itself, revealed they have their own agenda, by failing to report, as the MRC’s Rich Noyes pointed out , that Fox News didn’t mention the Sherrod story until she had already left her job. However, that didn’t stop Curry from claiming, in the 8am half hour news brief, that: “After the video was used to vilify her on Fox television, she lost her job,” and Guthrie advancing the NAACP’s notion, in her piece, that they had been “snookered” by Fox News. The following is a complete transcript of Guthrie’s set-up piece followed by Lauer’s interview with Sherrod as they were aired on the July 21 Today show: MATT LAUER: Now to the turbulence facing the Obama administration over the resignation of an Agriculture Department official. Was she forced to quit her job for comments that were taken completely out of context? We’re gonna talk to Shirley Sherrod in a moment, but first, NBC’s Savannah Guthrie is at the White House with the latest. Savannah, good morning. [On screen headline: “Race In America, Should Obama Appointee Have Been Forced To Resign?”] SAVANNAH GUTHRIE: Good morning to you, Matt. Well these developments are moving really quickly. At first there were condemnations against Shirley Sherrod for alleged racist remarks. But now some of the very first people to rebuke her are now apologizing and over the night the White House directed the agency that fired her to reconsider. This is the video at the center of the controversy. SHIRLEY SHERROD: The first time I was faced with having to help a white farmer save his farm- GUTHRIE: First posted on a conservative Web site, it shows Shirley Sherrod, a Georgia-based official with the U.S. Department of Agriculture, an Obama administration appointee, at an NAACP dinner in March of this year describing her reluctance to help a white farmer who came for aid. SHERROD: I was struggling with the fact that so many black people had lost their farmland, and here I was faced with having to help a white person save their land. So I didn’t give him the full force of what I could do. GUTHRIE: The video became an overnight cable news sensation. BILL O’REILLY: Miss Sherrod must resign immediately. The federal government cannot have skin color deciding any assistance. LAURA INGRAHAM: The question is how many more people like Miss Sherrod exist in the Obama administration? GUTHRIE: The action against Sherrod was quick and decisive. The NAACP condemned her, calling her remarks shameful and intolerable. The USDA asked her to resign. Sherrod says she was driving Monday afternoon when she got the call from an official in Washington. SHERROD: She said, “Well they want you to pull over to the side of the road and submit your resignation.” It was just unbelievable. You know, it was just unbelievable. GUTHRIE: But Sherrod says it was a rush to judgment. The incident she had described at the March NAACP dinner had occurred more than 20 years ago, before she worked for the USDA, and it was a story she told, as an example of overcoming her own prejudices. SHERROD: That’s when it was revealed to me that it’s about poor versus those who have. And in telling that story, how I changed while working with him, I used that to help others to see it’s not about race. GUTHRIE: The farmer who Sherrod is accused of treating unfairly went public Tuesday saying she is no racist and saved his family farm. FARMER: I appreciated everything she done for [us], and we got our farm back. GUTHRIE: Still, in a statement Tuesday, Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack stood by his decision to fire Sherrod saying, quote, “We have been working to turn the page on this sordid civil rights record at USDA, and this controversy could make it more difficult to move forward on correcting injustices. But by Tuesday night, the NAACP had reversed course. Officials looked at the full context of her remarks made at the NAACP’s own event, concluded they’d been, quote, “snookered” by Fox News and the conservative activist, who first posted portions of the video. But they acknowledged, they were too quick to condemn. BENJAMIN JEALOUS, NAACP PRESIDENT: We made a mistake here. We have a very good batting average. You know it is near 1,000 but some times we make a mistake and we, and we made one here. GUTHRIE: For Shirley Sherrod, the damage has been done. SHERROD: They called me a racist, of all people. They called me a racist. When you look at my work, when you look at everything I’ve done, you know that I’m not a racist. GUTHRIE: Alright, so initially officials here at the White House said this was solely at the discretion of the Agriculture Secretary, Tom Vilsack. That the President was briefed only afterward, although staff knew something of it, and that he fully stood by the Agriculture Secretary’s decision. However, late last night after the full video was posted on the NAACP Web site, the White House contacted the Agriculture Secretary and encouraged the Agriculture Secretary to take another look. He now says he will, and let me read the statement from Tom Vilsack. He said, quote, “I am, of course, willing and will conduct a thorough review and consider additional facts to ensure to the American people we are providing services in a fair and equitable manner.” But no word yet, Matt, this morning whether or not Shirley Sherrod gets her job back. MATT LAUER: Savannah Guthrie, thank you very much. Shirley Sherrod is with us now from Atlanta. Miss Sherrod, good morning to you. SHIRLEY SHERROD: Good morning. LAUER: What a 24-48 hours you’ve had. I mean let’s go through it here. You were villainized, you were forced to resign, and then when, when even the most elementary level of investigation was put toward your situation, what I like to call the “oopses!” began. The NAACP, which had originally come out against you, apologized saying they made a mistake and now I even understand that the Agriculture Secretary who originally stood by his decision, has said he’s willing to see more information. Can you describe your emotions as we sit here and talk this morning? SHERROD: You know, it’s so hard looking at the last 24 hours. When the department, when, you know, this first came to light I said to them you need to look at the whole thing. That’s not the message I was putting out there. And for them, all day yesterday, to say they were standing by their decision and now, you know, at this late hour to be saying they are now willing to look at the facts, you know, it’s hard to take at this point. LAUER: What’s outrageous about this is this story, that was sent out there as an example of racism on your part was the opposite. It was a story of enlightenment and transformation of overcoming the narrow mindedness that you had been surrounded by as a younger woman and here it was completely misconstrued and misrepresented. SHERROD: Yes, and I couldn’t get people, I couldn’t get the people I was working with, people who should have listened to me, to see that because that was one of the things I kept saying. You need to look at the whole thing. That’s not my message. That’s not me. If you look at my life, if you look at my life’s work, you would know that, that’s not me. [On screen headline: “Race In America, Obama Appointee Forced To Resign Speaks Out”] LAUER: As a state worker in Georgia, you tell this story about how you were dealing with a white farmer who was about to lose his farm and perhaps the temptation was there on your part to continue down the road, you had seen so many travel in the past and maybe not give that farmer, that white person, all the benefit of your help. But you had this, almost an epiphany at that moment- SHERROD: Yes. LAUER: -and said, “Wait a second, the civil rights movement was not about black versus white. It’s about the poor and the powerless and this man deserves as much help as anyone.” I mean did, could anyone who had listened, who would have listened to the entire story have, have thought of you as a racist? SHERROD: I don’t think they would have. I don’t, if, you know, anyone, you know, most people would not have known me but if they had looked at the entire tape, I just don’t see how they could’ve come away with it, thinking I was a racist. LAUER: I don’t who to blame- SHERROD: You know those- LAUER: I don’t know who to blame here, Miss Sherrod. I mean the, the, the activist who put forward this garbage in the first place has an agenda. We shouldn’t be surprised by that. SHERROD: Right. LAUER: The cable news network that, that played this garbage on and on and talked about it, has an agenda. We shouldn’t be surprised by that. I am shocked at the NAACP, I have to admit. That, that- SHERROD: Yes. LAUER: -that they did not investigate further before condemning you. And I’m shocked at the Obama administration for not putting an investigation in place either. Can you give me your thoughts on that? SHERROD: Yes. I was particularly hurt by the NAACP’s reaction to it because if they – you know, I put years, all of my life has been about civil rights work and fairness. And if they had just taken the time to look at it, to see, to look at me, to, to see what I’ve done, I’m certain they would not have come out with that first statement. But I can appreciate the fact that they now have looked at it, they’ve seen, and they come up with a new statement. I can accept the apology. LAUER: And as for the Obama administration, as for the Obama administration, why do you think the Secretary of Agriculture acted so quickly in this situation? SHERROD: You know, that is so hard to, to, to take, especially when I kept saying look at the entire thing. Look at my message and no one would listen. No one would listen. LAUER: The NAACP, Miss Sherrod, now calls this “a teachable moment.”What lessons have you learned? SHERROD: Oh, gosh. You know, the, it’s, it’s the outpouring of support has just been great for me. To, you know, I don’t know that I would have done anything different because this is just me. This is my life. It’s all about fairness. And then to not be treated fairly, you know, in this whole situation is, is, it’s, it’s just something hard to deal with. LAUER: The door seems to be open a little bit to you getting your, your old job back. Do you want to walk through that door? SHERROD: You know, I am just not sure of how I would be treated there now. That’s, that’s, that’s one I just don’t know at this point. LAUER: Shirley Sherrod. Miss Sherrod I thank you for your time this morning. SHERROD: Thank you.

Read the original post:
NBC’s Today Show Inaccurately Blames Fox News for Sherrod Firing

Bristol Palin, Levi Johnston Reflect on Hilariously Staged Engagement

Bristol Palin and Levi Johnston recently got engaged . Again. While we don’t doubt that the parents of 18-month-old son Tripp are genuine in their feelings for each other, they’re clearly milking the reconciliation for all it’s worth, even putting celebrity gossip coverage ahead of family. In a poignant sit-down with Us Weekly , Bristol Palin reveals that her mother Sarah Palin “doesn’t really approve” of her surprise engagement to Levi. Perhaps because she wasn’t told beforehand? Just a guess. “She’s apprehensive and concerned. She doesn’t want to see me get hurt again,” says Bristol. “My mom is not 100 percent backing us up right now.” How did Bristol and Levi break the news to Sarah? Over the phone. “She knew Levi and I had been talking, but she wanted to know if Levi was really sincere about this,” says Bristol, admitting Us knew before her folks . “I told her we were working on our relationship for Tripp, and she told me, ‘Actions speak louder than words.’ She’s going to wait to see if he changes.” “People are more worried for me than excited for me,” she confesses. Sarah Palin’s feud with Levi is infamous, and her feelings evident in a vapid statement not congratulating them, but saying “Bristol believes in redemption and forgiveness to a degree most of us struggle to put in practice in our daily lives.” Follow the jump for a video of the magazine’s interview with the probably soon-to-be newlyweds. WARNING : It’s easily a 9.5 out of 10 on the Cheese Meter. We can only imagine with their future reality show is going to be like: <object classid=”clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000″ id=”ooyalaPlayer_4qbmc_gbv9bm13″ width=”500″ height=”250″ codebase=”http://fpdownload.macromedia.com/get/flashplayer/current/swflash.cab”><param name=”movie” value=”http://player.ooyala.com/player.swf?embedCode=E3eG9rMTqEY8kPqV5j69M4Qo2InFMA4t&version=2″ /><param name=”bgcolor” value=”#000000″ /><param name=”allowScriptAccess” value=”always” /><param name=”allowFullScreen” value=”true” /><param name=”flashvars” value=”embedType=noscriptObjectTag&embedCode=E3eG9rMTqEY8kPqV5j69M4Qo2InFMA4t&autoplay=1&browserPlacement=right200px” /><embed src=”http://player.ooyala.com/player.swf?embedCode=E3eG9rMTqEY8kPqV5j69M4Qo2InFMA4t&version=2″ mce_src=”http://player.ooyala.com/player.swf?embedCode=E3eG9rMTqEY8kPqV5j69M4Qo2InFMA4t&version=2″ bgcolor=”#000000″ width=”600″ height=”300″ name=”ooyalaPlayer_4qbmc_gbv9bm13″ align=”middle” play=”true” loop=”false” allowscriptaccess=”always” allowfullscreen=”true” type=”application/x-shockwave-flash” flashvars=”&embedCode=E3eG9rMTqEY8kPqV5j69M4Qo2InFMA4t&autoplay=1&browserPlacement=right200px” pluginspage=”http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer”></embed></object> Bristol and Levi Interview

See the rest here:
Bristol Palin, Levi Johnston Reflect on Hilariously Staged Engagement

‘Dallas’ Star Larry Hagman Refuses to Let Facts Get In the Way Of Enviro-Propaganda

When news recently broke that the 78 year-old actor Larry Hagman had surfaced in California promoting solar energy as means of staving off the end of civilization, I must admit I was somewhat taken aback. Prior to this, the last time anyone had heard from Hagman was when he was part of a “who done it” spoof which TV viewers watched in an attempt to ascertain “Who Shot J.R.?” Now he looks like just so many other Hollywood figures that miss the limelight and therefore come out and say something crazy in order to get a little attention: Either that or he actually believes the things he said in the interview for the Oregonian . (After reading the interview a couple of times, I personally hope he’s just talking crazy to get attention because if he really believes the things he said, Hollywood has hit a new low.) In the interview, Hagman takes Sarah Palin’s famous “Drill, baby, Drill” and augments it to fit solar energy by changing it to “Shine, baby, Shine.” He describes solar power as “an inexhaustible source of energy” which he uses to provide electricity for his home. To this point, Hagman’s words are reasonable: If someone wants to provide power for their home via solar panels rather than conventional electricity that’s their choice (although I would be interested to know what the backup plan is for densely overcast or stormy days, as well as whether the panels themselves are hail resistant). But Hagman soon threw reasonableness out the window and tried to advance a need for solar panels based on his belief that oil is scarce and civilization is ending. His exact words were: “When affordable oil gives out, we’re in real trouble – I mean the collapse of civilization, within 15 to 20 years.” I can only say that I was embarrassed for Hagman’s family when I read those words. The United States has enough untapped oil to meet current demand for more than one hundred years (up to 300 years in some estimates). Thus, when gasoline was $4 a gallon in 2008, even Newsweek magazine asked aloud why we weren’t drilling for more oil near the Rocky Mountains, where it is estimated that we have enough oil in shale to ” out-produce Saudi Arabia.” And I haven’t even mentioned the billions of barrels of oil that await us in ANWR or, dare I say, offshore. In all honesty, the only way “affordable oil” will cease to exist for our nation is if we lack the courage or the ingenuity to go after it, or if the market is presented with such a clear and dependable alternative to oil that the need for oil disappears altogether. So far, however, Americans are both courageous and ingenious, and the handful of Hollywood actors who put solar panels on their homes don’t represent enough market demand to change things. In the end, it seems that the actor who played an oilman in “Dallas” didn’t learn much about oil at all. Crossposted at Big Hollywood .

Read more:
‘Dallas’ Star Larry Hagman Refuses to Let Facts Get In the Way Of Enviro-Propaganda

CBS ‘Early Show’ Touted Levi Johnston When He Was Trashing the Palins, But Now That He’s Recanted….

CBS’s Early Show was eager to host Levi Johnston when he was trashing the Palin family last year – 5 segments totaling more than 24 minutes of airtime. But since admitting that some of his attacks were untrue, the morning show has barely noticed, making only two brief mentions of Johnston’s reversal and apology in a July 6 People Magazine interview . On Friday, fill-in co-host Erica Hill offered a scant 42 second discussion of Johnston’s apology in the show’s weekly ‘Early Wrap’ segment. She actually admitted that it had been “highly under-reported.” On Wednesday, amidst  2 minutes and 32 seconds of coverage of Johnston’s re-engagement to Bristol Palin, a total of 25 seconds was given to his apology.  During the Wednesday coverage, co-host Harry Smith remarked: “How many times was that young man on this show talking really horrible things about the Palins?” Later, Hill declared that Johnston “said some rather unflattering things,” causing Smith to once again describe how “Levi was on this show a bunch, several times in that era, and did interviews with [fellow Early Show co-host] Maggie [Rodriguez].”   Of the five 2009 segments about Johnston, three were exclusive interviews between him and  Rodriguez. The first interview aired on April 8, while the second was aired in two parts on October 28 and 29.  In addition, the show did September 3 segment on Johnston’s anti-Palin Vanity Fair interview and a November 17 story previewing an interview with him on the CBS entertainment news program ‘The Insider.’   During each of those broadcasts, Johnston’s allegations were hyped as important breaking news. On September 3, Smith declared: “The father of Sarah Palin’s grandchild is talking again. Someone won’t be pleased. We’ll tell you what Levi Johnston is saying.” On October 27, Smith announced: “The father of Sarah Palin’s grandson is here with some stunning allegations about the former Alaska Governor.” Teasing the November 17 segment, Rodriguez proclaimed: “Still to come, Levi Johnston says he is winning the war of words between Sarah Palin and him. We’ll hear from him when we return.” A clip was later played of Johnston: “I just look at her in disgust. It’s almost funny that she’s like 46 years old and she’s battling a 19-year-old and I’m winning and I’m telling the truth. She’s lying and losing.” After airing the second part of her interview with Johnston on October 29, Rodriguez read a response from Sarah Palin that said in part: “CBS should be ashamed for continually providing a forum to propagate lies.” Rodriguez defended herself by claiming “…we raised all those questions about credibility and his motivation for doing this.” Now that Johnston has admitted to making false statements, when will CBS admit its mistake in providing him a media platform.

Read more:
CBS ‘Early Show’ Touted Levi Johnston When He Was Trashing the Palins, But Now That He’s Recanted….