Tag Archives: jon-stewart

Late Night Highlights: Ben Affleck Jokes About Gay Sex With Matt Damon

It is always a warm reunion when Ben Affleck visits his former faux-lover Jimmy Kimmel on the ABC late show. Last night, the two lamented their lost relationship and expensive Disneyland tickets, before The Town director made an unfortunate joke about the positions that he and Boston buddy Matt Damon take in bed. Elsewhere, John Stamos remembered (almost) sleeping with Cloris Leachman, Stephen Colbert apologized for his wrongful interpretation of “Black Friday” and Judah Friedlander taught Jon Stewart how to beat up Bigfoot.

The rest is here:
Late Night Highlights: Ben Affleck Jokes About Gay Sex With Matt Damon

5 Shows That Should Cast Lone Star’s Now-Available James Wolk

It wasn’t supposed to happen this way for James Wolk. The relative newcomer was positioned as one of the breakout candidates of the fall because of his performance on the high-profile Fox series Lone Star . (It wasn’t just Movieline ; honest !) Fame, fortune and talk of being the Next George Clooney were surely to follow, except for one teensy, little problem: No one watched Lone Star ; late yesterday it became the first fall series to get canceled. Does this mean Wolk’s star will burnout before it even lights up? Hopefully not! Here are six shows that could help put his breakout career back on the tracks.

See the rest here:
5 Shows That Should Cast Lone Star’s Now-Available James Wolk

Late Night Highlights: Letterman Explains His Oprah Feud, Chelsea Handler Talks Katy Perry Cleavage

It was a special night for afterhours television. Jon Stewart stopped by the Ed Sullivan Theater and coaxed his late night peer David Letterman into finally explaining why Oprah hated him all of those years. Meanwhile, Chelsea Handler and Stephen Colbert talked about Katy Perry’s Sesame Street cleavage and Jimmy Fallon helped Law & Order: SVU fans realize their wet t-shirt fantasy.

View original post here:
Late Night Highlights: Letterman Explains His Oprah Feud, Chelsea Handler Talks Katy Perry Cleavage

Stephen Colbert Slams Rick Sanchez: His Endorsement Could Get Me Tens of Supporters

Comedian Stephen Colbert on Thursday ridiculed Rick Sanchez, the much-maligned CNN personality that deservedly is the butt of many jokes. After telling his “Colbert Report” viewers that Jon Stewart’s Washington rally next month has been endorsed by Oprah Winfrey, Colbert informed them that he too has gotten a “major media figure” in his corner. Upon learning the endorsement is from Sanchez, Colbert said, “Wow. Rick Sanchez. The coveted Sanchez bump. That could get me tens of supporters.” After showing a clip of the CNNer making a fool of himself on the air, Colbert panicked, “Oh, my God. It’s like I’m a freshman and I’ve just been befriended by a loser upper-classman” (video follows with transcript and commentary, h/t Right Scoop ): STEPHEN COLBERT: Whoop-dee-doo, Jon. Oprah tweeted about you. It just so happens that I got a tweet from Gail. She even re-tweeted it to the authorities. And guess what? Guess what, Jon? I have just been informed that I’ve gotten my own endorsement from a major media figure, too. I’m so excited. Who could it be? Jimmy. (BEGIN VIDEOTAPE) RICK SANCHEZ: Keep fear alive. BROOKE BALDWIN: Yeah, keep fear alive. SANCHEZ: I love that. Here’s what we’re going to do. Let’s start ignoring the other guy, I’m not even going to say his name, and give all the emphasis to Stephen Colbert… BALDWIN: Okay. SANCHEZ: …because he’s a true American. We’re not even going to talk about the other guy. (END VIDEOTAPE) [Laughter] COLBERT: Wow. Rick Sanchez. The coveted Sanchez bump. That could get me tens of supporters. Take that, Jon. You know what, Jimmy, give me a little taste of this Cracker Jack, nimble-minded newsman. (BEGIN VIDEOTAPE) SANCHEZ: Up next, ad-lib a tease. That’s what it says right here. Now, I’m supposed to ad-lib about something that I should know about, right? (END VIDEOTAPE) COLBERT: Oh, my God. [Laughter and applause] COLBERT: It’s like I’m a freshman and I’ve just been befriended by a loser upper-classman. Now I have to eat lunch with him the whole year. Snap out of it, Colbert, snap out of it. Look at this positively. Rick Sanchez is kind of like Oprah for people who like to watch Rick Sanchez getting tased. Right, Rick? (BEGIN VIDEOTAPE) SANCHEZ: Do it. (Groans in agony.) COLBERT: I can’t believe — (groans in agony) — never became his trademark signoff. So, Rick, Rick, my friend, if you really want to help me get my Facebook total up, come to my march, stand on stage with me, and let me tase you. For America. CNN should be so proud that one of its anchors is the focus of so many jokes.  Just imagine how comedians are going to go after Eliot Spitzer and Piers Morgan once their programs start.

Excerpt from:
Stephen Colbert Slams Rick Sanchez: His Endorsement Could Get Me Tens of Supporters

Tribune’s Matea Gold: Jon Stewart Rally ‘Could Draw Tens of Thousands’

Just two days before Glenn Beck’s August 28 “Restoring Honor” rally, the Washington Post published an article about how the rally would “be a measure of the tea party’s strength.” “When Fox News and talk radio host Glenn Beck comes to Washington this weekend to headline a rally intended to ‘restore honor’ to America, he will test the strength – and potentially expose the weaknesses – of a conservative grass-roots movement that remains an unpredictable force in the country’s politics,” staffer Amy Gardner argued in the opening paragraph of her August 26 story. Gardner’s article is but one example of the media’s skeptical attitude prior to the Beck rally. Yet just days after two Comedy Central hosts announced mock rallies for October 30 on the Mall, the liberal media are expecting that Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert can easily draw a large crowd.  I noted the breathless anticipation of Newsweek’s Daniel Stone last Friday . Now it seems that Matea Gold of the Washington bureau of the Tribune Company is also decidedly optimistic. In her 13-paragraph article, accessible at LATimes.com , Gold quoted a few folks who plan on attending and took the Facebook RSVPs on face value as a signal about potential attendance: As of Wednesday afternoon, more than 132,000 people planned to attend, according to the event’s Facebook page, while satellite rallies were being organized in Chicago, Seattle, Austin and other cities. Nowhere in her article did Gold give ink to any skeptic who would rain on the Comedy Central parade by suggesting the initial “hey, that sounds cool” interest by Stewart/Colbert fans would fail to flesh out into actual attendance after they consider the cost and hassle of attending the event.

Read more:
Tribune’s Matea Gold: Jon Stewart Rally ‘Could Draw Tens of Thousands’

New York Times Reporter Kevin Sack Issues White House Press Releases for Obama-Care

The first wave of Obama-care goes into effect today, and New York Times health-care reporter Kevin Sack celebrated with a series of propaganda-style articles for the front of the National section, topped by ” For Many Families, Health Care Relief Begins Today .” (As did higher costs and denied coverage, but the Times didn’t get into that.) The Times’s headline reads more like an Obama administration press release than an actual instance of journalism, and Sack’s reference (in a news story) to the “Darwinian insurance system” doesn’t inspire confidence in his objectivity. Sometimes lost in the partisan clamor about the new health care law is the profound relief it is expected to bring to hundreds of thousands of Americans who have been stricken first by disease and then by a Darwinian insurance system. On Thursday, the six-month anniversary of the signing of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, a number of its most central consumer protections take effect, just in time for the midterm elections. Starting now, insurance companies will no longer be permitted to exclude children because of pre-existing health conditions, which the White House said could enable 72,000 uninsured to gain coverage. Insurers also will be prohibited from imposing lifetime limits on benefits. The law will now forbid insurers to drop sick and costly customers after discovering technical mistakes on applications. It requires that they offer coverage to children under 26 on their parents’ policies. After Sack allowed a single middle paragraph for dissent from House Republicans, and a brief mention that Democrats had managed to defer “the pain of tax increases and penalties until after the election,” he indulged in more leftist boosting of the program’s alleged popularity, or at least “many of the provisions.” Sack conveniently bypasses the findings of recent New York Times/CBS News polls that find most respondents disapprove of the plan. Polls have found that many of the provisions taking effect Thursday are popular, tugging at a national sense of fairness and feeding off distrust of health insurers . They bear particular appeal for the 14 million people who must buy policies on the individual market rather than through employers and are thus at the mercy of the industry. And they land on the heels of a government report showing that the recession drove the number of uninsured Americans to 50.7 million in 2009, up 10 percent in a year. Three other brief profiles on the same page were headlined as if the Obama administration were free-lancing as copy editors. “Chronically Ill, and Covered,” “Cap Lifts, and So Do Spirits,” and “24, and Back in the Fold.” (Insurers must offer coverage to “children” (?) under their parents’ plan until they turn 26.) The Washington Examiner has an alternative view in an editorial: ” Obamacare is even worse than critics thought .” A couple of the editorial’s bullet points: Obamacare won’t decrease health care costs for the government. According to Medicare’s actuary, it will increase costs. The same is likely to happen for privately funded health care. Obamacare will increase insurance premiums — in some places, it already has. Insurers, suddenly forced to cover clients’ children until age 26, have little choice but to raise premiums, and they attribute to Obamacare’s mandates a 1 to 9 percent increase. Obama’s only method of preventing massive rate increases so far has been to threaten insurers.

Read the original:
New York Times Reporter Kevin Sack Issues White House Press Releases for Obama-Care

David Gregory Admires Jon Stewart’s ‘Serious’ Work ‘A Lot,’ Laments Helen Thomas ‘Lost Her Way’ With Polemics

NBC Meet the Press host David Gregory spoke on Tuesday at the City Club in Seattle, Washington, and John Hamer of the Washington News Council reported on Gregory’s remarks, which he found pretty bland. He found some spice in Gregory’s answers to audience questions.  On Jon Stewart’s “sanity” rally on Halloween weekend: “He’s a comedian, but he’s also got a point of view. I think what they do is serious. It’s not a joke.” However, “They are part of the media polarization.” As for Stewart: “He asks tough questions. He does a great job. I admire him a lot.” On suddenly retired columnist (and former UPI reporter) Helen Thomas: I think Helen lost her way. I don’t know when that happened..I thought she was miscast as the ‘dean of the press corps.’ She was a polemicist. Her views in the press corps were well known.” Left unsaid (at least from this report): None of the star White House reporters ever questioned the “Helen the Dean” legend, including Gregory. They underlined it. They only abandoned that position once she lashed out at the rabbi that Jews should “get the hell out” of Israel and “go home” to Germany. There’s more: The blogosphere, naturally, is weighed down with a whole lot of er, excrement: “I like to see what the Zeitgeist is in that community, but even with millions of people it’s a limited community. It can be an echo chamber. It can be partisan in one way or another..Is there some good reporting that goes on? Of course. But there’s also a whole lot of crap. It’s not a monolith.” The Tea Party, and sigh, its racist elements: It’s a “populist, conservative, small-government, anti-Washington [D.C.] movement,” upset with “bailouts” and “too much deficit spending.” Also: “And a real antipathy toward Obama that in some cases is racism.” (Hamer said, “Easy to say. Any clear evidence?”) Obama not “big enough” to get advice from Dubya: “Certainly President Obama is not as popular as he would like to be – or as he was expected to be.” Gregory said Rahm Emanuel told Obama that he “had to get close to Bill Clinton,” and Obama did that. “President Obama is not going to be big enough to call on President Bush all that often.” As for his own job, Gregory was asked if he missed the White House front-row seat. He called Meet the Press “is the ultimate front row. This is the ultimate job..We try to set the agenda. We try to move the story forward. We try to make news – and we do.” He said the show’s mission is accountability, relevance, constructive engagement, thoughtful discussion. It’s a place to ‘put it all together.'” But, he lamented: “There ought to be more outlets where we’re really listening to each other, not waiting to pounce. We don’t have enough intellectual spontaneity. I like to see people really wrestling with issues.”  Like many “mainstream” media types, Gregory sang the Scarborough song about too much divisiveness in politics: “We’ve always been polarized,” and that is “compounded by a media culture that has become increasingly polarized..I just don’t feel like constructive engagement with the other side is something that’s celebrated anymore..There’s a big political center in this country but we tend to write them off.” Replied Hamer: “This from the ‘firebrand in the front row’ whose current show delights in conflict?”

See the rest here:
David Gregory Admires Jon Stewart’s ‘Serious’ Work ‘A Lot,’ Laments Helen Thomas ‘Lost Her Way’ With Polemics

New York Magazine Columnist: Jon Stewart ‘Invaluable’ as Media Critic; ‘Most Trusted Man in America’

Lauding Jon Stewart’s biting humor and criticism of today’s politicized media, NY Magazine columnist Chris Smith called him “Cronkite, the most trusted man in America” in his piece featured on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” Friday. The show’s panel largely agreed with him and emphasized that Stewart is bi-partisan in his comedy. “The right provides better raw material, but Stewart’s complaints are bi-partisan,” Smith writes in his column ” America is a Joke .” On MSNBC, Smith described Stewart as a “comedy opportunist, you know, where people do mockable things – left, right, in-between.” The show’s co-host Joe Scarborough joined Smith in diffusing the myth that Stewart is a raging liberal. “Over the past year, he’s been every bit as tough on the Obama administration as Republicans on Capitol Hill,” he asserted.   The panel seemed to agree that Stewart is hilarious, but pressed about the anger that lies underneath his cynicism. Smith affirmed this. “Oh, no question, that’s what gives [his humor] weight and bite, and you know, he admits to being angry every day, and the show gives him the catharsis, you know, it gives him the chance to point things out. And it’s not just anger for the sake of anger.” Smith added that Stewart’s angry criticisms sometimes pass for reporting as well. “You know, he did something three, four weeks ago that maybe you guys covered – I certainly didn’t….But pointing out that Fox has been taking all these shots at the mosque, and who’s funding it – and then they go and do their homework to say well, NewsCorp’s second-largest investor is a Saudi prince. You know, that’s reporting as much as it is anger or humor.” A transcript of highlights from the segment, which aired on September 17, at 7:42 a.m. EDT, is as follows: CHRIS SMITH, columnist, New York magazine: Some things that have happened in the real world, many of them not funny, have given him openings. And the polarization of media – you know, cable channels, Fox obviously the biggest culprit, has given Stewart a middle to both poke fun at and sort of represent in some ways. (…) WILLIE GEIST: Is he driven by anger? Because when you read the things he says about the media, he holds the media in utter contempt, almost across the board. That includes the right and the left. SMITH: Yeah, uh, anger and a faint, naive hope for intelligence to rule the day – you know, he still thinks there’s some dream state, you know, of American political discourse where we can be nicer to each other and have genuine arguments, but have them be based on fact and not emotion. (…) JOE SCARBOROUGH: …over the past year, he’s been every bit as tough on the Obama administration as Republicans on Capitol Hill, and he also has been tough on extremists on the left as well as extremists on the right. Um, Have you – have you noted that in your piece? Have you talked about the fact that he goes after the left now as aggressively as the right in many cases? SMITH: Certainly, and it’s not out of any agenda, you know, big picture-attempt to be “fair and balanced,” to coin a phrase. But he is a comedy opportunist, you know, where people do mockable things, left, right, in-between. He’s going to go for the punchline. (…) SCARBOROUGH: And Mika, you’ve always talked about his brilliance….But John Stewart works hard, but the guy, as you always say, is brilliant. He’s one of the smartest guys on TV. (…) MIKA BRZEZINSKI: …I do think that there’s a tinge of anger in a lot of his humor. SMITH: Oh, no question, that’s what gives it weight and bite, and you know, he admits to being angry every day, and the show gives him the catharsis, you know, it gives him the chance to point things out. And it’s not just anger for the sake of anger. You know, he did something three, four weeks ago that maybe you guys covered – I certainly didn’t….But pointing out that Fox has been taking all these shots at the mosque, and who’s funding it. And then they go and do their homework to say well, NewsCorp’s second-largest investor is a Saudi prince, you know, that’s reporting as much as it is anger or humor.

Read this article:
New York Magazine Columnist: Jon Stewart ‘Invaluable’ as Media Critic; ‘Most Trusted Man in America’

Wishful Thinking by Newsweek: Jon Stewart’s Mock Rally on 10/30 Will ‘Absolutely’ ‘Gain Traction’

Comedy Central’s Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert have announced dueling D.C. rallies on October 30 aimed at satirizing the August 28 “Restoring Honor” rally held by rival network Fox News Channel’s Glenn Beck. Newsweek’s Daniel Stone is apparently stoked about it, predicting that the gimmick will “absolutely” be a success (emphasis mine): You’ve got to hand it to Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert , social critics that they are, for keeping us attuned to the absurdity in our political discourse these days…. [N]either man has gone after anyone quite so ferociously as Glenn Beck , the weepy Fox pundit who’s demonstrated he can amass quite a following. Last month, Beck hosted a rally on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial, urging America to “Restore Honor”—an amorphous plea to support the troops, find God, and honor thy neighbor. About 100,000 people showed up and agreed. But do those people speak for the rest of the country? Stewart and Colbert say no (or should it be Colbert and Stewart? More on that in a moment). Neither thinks that the loudest voices should be the only ones who are heard. And, in a move that is part social critique and part hilarious satire, both men are hosting rallies next month to counter, or maybe simply mock, the Beck rally. That’s right, they’re hosting rallies. Plural. Stewart and Colbert (who, of course, was birthed by Stewart) have an antagonistic relationship made for TV. Neither wants to play second fiddle to the other, so each is having his own rally on the same day in the same location. Stewart’s rally is to “Restore Sanity .” Colbert’s is to “Keep Fear Alive .” Will it gain traction? Odds are, absolutely. The district has a bustling community of 20- and 30-somethings, who are Stewart and Colbert’s most loyal demographic. Plus any folks around the country who would come to D.C. to support the Comedy Central duo. Or maybe just to oppose Glenn Beck. One of the two. He cannot be serious, can he? Does Stone think that the age demographic most apathetic, historically speaking, about voting is going to travel on Halloween weekend to stand on the Mall to hear Jon Stewart crack a few jokes about Glenn Beck?  What’s more, isn’t the whole ethos of the Daily Show and Colbert Report that American politics is fundamentally absurd, thoroughly lame, and ultimately not worth caring too much about. While Tea Parties and the Glenn Beck rally have drawn hundreds of thousands who are fired up to vote and passionate about their views on the country’s direction, this rally purports to appeal to people who don’t really give a damn one way or the other and hence aren’t really the sort of folks to show up en masse for any cause. Does Stone really think Stewart and Colbert’s audiences have nothing better to do than drop a thousand dollars or so on airfare and lodging to come to D.C. for a non-rally rally just to spite a conservative cable news host?! If he really thinks that, whatever Stone’s smoking may be of more interest to Stewart’s target audience than the so-called Rally to Restore Sanity.

Continue reading here:
Wishful Thinking by Newsweek: Jon Stewart’s Mock Rally on 10/30 Will ‘Absolutely’ ‘Gain Traction’

Hollywood Ink: Jennifer Garner’s Odd Life

Also in this morning’s Hollywood Ink: A Mad Men star will appear in Superman … Pinocchio gets a totally necessary live-action reboot… fire can’t stop The Darkest Hour … and more ahead.

Original post:
Hollywood Ink: Jennifer Garner’s Odd Life