Tag Archives: keith-olbermann

Jesse Eisenberg on Awards Season, Narcissism and His Feelings About an Oscar Nomination

Last week I met actor Jesse Eisenberg for a lengthy discussion of subjects ranging from his coming-of-age in the New York theater to his beloved Zombieland and his awards-season prospects for The Social Network. We covered a lot of ground, which I’ll be retracing this week in a five-part series here at Movieline. Let it be said, once and for all: Jesse Eisenberg is not shy. The young actor the media so often describes as nerdy or awkward in fact hinted at an endearing unpredictability last Thursday afternoon: Mere minutes after learning his Social Network performance as Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg nabbed him the National Board of Review award for Best Actor, Eisenberg phoned to ask if we could ditch our original diner meeting spot — and ditch his publicist, as it turned out — to meet early, just us, wherever I happened to be at the time.

See the original post:
Jesse Eisenberg on Awards Season, Narcissism and His Feelings About an Oscar Nomination

Movieline’s Favorite Palin Feud of the Day: Margaret Cho vs. Bristol

Let’s just say The Social Network is probably Bristol Palin’s favorite movie of the year. Either that or Cats and Dogs: The Revenge of Kitty Galore . After blasting Keith Olbermann on her Facebook page last week for calling her the “worst person in the world,” Bristol was at it again this weekend when she took on some recent comments made by Margaret Cho. Do Facebook ghostwriters get overtime for working weekends?

Read more here:
Movieline’s Favorite Palin Feud of the Day: Margaret Cho vs. Bristol

Movieline’s Favorite Palin Feud of the Day: Keith Olbermann vs. Bristol

This rarely recurring feature was once called ” Movieline’s Favorite Celebrity Feud of the Day ,” but since all feuds lead through Wasilla nowadays, let’s just change the title accordingly. This week, MSNBC anchor Keith Olbermann railed against former Dancing with the Stars finalist Bristol Palin because she still preaches about the effectiveness of abstinence (preaching made difficult by the child in her arms). Calling Bristol the “worst person in the world” was taking it a bit too far, however, and so Bristol replied to Olbermann the way most Palin’s express themselves — with a missive on Facebook .

See the article here:
Movieline’s Favorite Palin Feud of the Day: Keith Olbermann vs. Bristol

Bristol Palin Strikes Back at Olbermann: ‘Sorry We Can’t All Be As Perfect As You’

As NewsBusters previously reported , MSNBC's Keith Olbermann pathetically attacked Bristol Palin on Monday for being the Candie's Foundation's abstinence spokesperson. On Thursday, Miss Palin struck back via Facebook: read more

Continue reading here:
Bristol Palin Strikes Back at Olbermann: ‘Sorry We Can’t All Be As Perfect As You’

Newt Gingrich: I Will Not Go to Debate With Olbermann or Matthews Moderating

Newt Gingrich on Sunday said that if he runs for president in 2012, he would not participate in a debate that had MSNBC's Chris Matthews or Keith Olbermann moderating. Instead, the former Speaker of the House told C-SPAN's Steve Scully that he'd prefer to just have an open, informative dialogue between the candidates with only a timekeeper (video follows with transcript and commentary): read more

Continue reading here:
Newt Gingrich: I Will Not Go to Debate With Olbermann or Matthews Moderating

Anderson Cooper Puts PBS on His ‘Ridicu-List’

CNN would like to portray itself as the serious, no-gimmicks news network. So why would Anderson Cooper feel the need to copycat Keith Olbermann and come up with a editorializing feature called the “Ridicu-List”? On Tuesday night, he called out PBS for editing out Tina Fey's less-than-classy jokes about conservative women being great for women, unless you need a rape kit, or are lesbian, or believe in evolution. Cooper obviously believes in taxpayer-funded conservative-bashing: COOPER: So we started a new segment on the program this week, a nightly effort to point out hypocrisy, double talk, stuff that just is downright ridiculous. We call it the RidicuList. So who's on the list tonight? Well, it's the TV network PBS for their claims about why they edited Tina Fey. read more

Read more here:
Anderson Cooper Puts PBS on His ‘Ridicu-List’

NPR Invites Ted Koppel to Respond to Olbermann…But Utterly Excludes Bill O’Reilly

National Public Radio can't even host a discussion about objectivity in journalism without slanting it to the left. On Tuesday's Talk to the Nation , they invited on former ABC anchor Ted Koppel to discuss his Washington Post op-ed slamming cable news. Host Neal Conan played a large audio chunk of Keith Olbermann running down Koppel on Monday night's Countdown for “worshipping before the false god of utter objectivity” and failing to stop the war in Iraq. NPR offered 294 haughty words of Krazy Keith. But Koppel slammed Fox News as well as MSNBC. Why would NPR fail to air the views of Fox News? The Fox-hatred continues. All NPR listeners got was an insular debate between Old Liberal Media and New Leftist Media. Bill O'Reilly, in fact, also commented on Koppel on Monday night (with less aggression, and no suggestions that secular Koppel bowed before any god). Here's some of what NPR just couldn't bother to locate: read more

Read the rest here:
NPR Invites Ted Koppel to Respond to Olbermann…But Utterly Excludes Bill O’Reilly

Olbermann Attacks Koppel For Not Being As Anti-war As He Is

Keith Olbermann on Monday attacked Ted Koppel for not speaking out against the Iraq War as vehemently as he did. During his Special Comment, the “Countdown” host arrogantly claimed “Koppel and everybody else in the dead, objective television news business” failed the previous decade for not reporting “the utter falsehood and dishonesty of the process by which this country was committed to the wrong war” (video follows with commentary and transcript at end of post): read more

Read more from the original source:
Olbermann Attacks Koppel For Not Being As Anti-war As He Is

Likely Voters Steer Clear of MSNBC, Don’t Like or Don’t Know Prime Time Talkers

According to a recent poll, likely voters get their political news primarily from cable television. Among cable channels, 42 percent, a plurality, watch Fox News for its political coverage. Only 12 percent said they watched MSNBC. What’s more, most likely voters don’t like or have never heard of MSNBC’s prime time talent. The poll , conducted by Politico and George Washington University, used a sample split evenly between political parties – even slightly favoring Democrats in some areas : 41 percent of respondents identified as Republicans, while 42 percent said they were Democrats. Forty-four percent said they usually vote for Republicans, while 46 percent answered Democrats. Forty-eight percent voted for Obama, while only 45 percent voted for McCain. Even among this group, Fox News is by far the most popular cable outlet. CNN comes in at second, with 30 percent. A sorry MSNBC brings up the rear. Among cable news personalities, FNC’s Bill O’Reilly – consistently the highest-rated cable news talker – is the most popular. Forty-nine percent of respondents said they thought O’Reilly has a positive impact on the American political conversation. Thirty-two percent said he has a negative impact. Interestingly, respondents – again, split evenly among the two parties – thought all three of Fox’s evening opinion commentators (O’Reilly, Glenn Beck, and Sean Hannity) have a net positive impact on the national debate. All three have a positive spread in the category. Also of note, for none of the three did majorities answer “never heard of”. MSNBC’s hosts are a different story. Only 23 percent said Keith Olbermann has a positive impact on the debate, while 25 said he has a negative one. A plurality, 42 percent, had never heard of him But at least it was only a plurality. Majorities said they have never heard of Ed Schultz or Rachel Maddow – 70 percent and 55 percent, respectively. The positive impact/negative impact responses were split down the middle for both. In other words, the vast majority of likely voters either do not like MSNBC’s prime time talkers, or have never heard of them (with the notable exception of Chris Matthews, whose name was not included in the poll). “How did it get to this state?” wonders Ed Morrissey . After all, NBC had a long history in television news, starting decades before CNN and even longer than Fox. Its partnership with Microsoft should have given the cable news network a distinct advantage in the New Media world. Their roster of news anchors, present and future, should have immediately challenged CNN for primacy and marginalized Fox, who may have had cash but relatively fewer newsgathering resources in the US when it launched. Under the direction of GE’s Jeff Immelt, though, NBC’s cable network went for the full-insane demographic. Fox took CNN’s talking-head format and simply reversed the bias, although Fox rightly argues that it presents more opposing viewpoints than CNN did as part of their establishment talent and not just occasional guests and party spinmeisters. NBC decided to emulate Air America with its cable lineup instead, perhaps seeing some opportunity in the last Bush term to capitalize on his unpopularity and become a center of opposition opinion. Rather than accomplish that, the decision by NBC and its parent GE has not just destroyed MSNBC’s credibility but also NBC’s as well. With the exception of Joe Scarborough, who is hard to pigeonhole but certainly isn’t a hard-Left hysteric, the entire lineup is exactly what one would find on the failed libtalker radio network. It’s no coincidence that two of its featured hosts come straight out of Air America, Rachel Maddow and Ed Schultz. Maddow has, at least, produced a watchable show, albeit with a hard-Left tilt that clearly is out of touch with the mainstream, but Schultz is barely coherent. Top that off with a daily “news” broadcast from Keith Olbermann that almost literally consists of a Two Minute Hate (Olbermann’s WPIW lists), and it’s a recipe for the kind of disaster that only political hacks could love. The wonder is that GE and NBC apparently seem content to alienate 88% of the viewing audience with its trainwreck theater.

Read more:
Likely Voters Steer Clear of MSNBC, Don’t Like or Don’t Know Prime Time Talkers

Big 3 Nets’ Evening News Audience Fails to Break 20 Million in Mid-September

They’re out of excuses. Summer’s over. It’s after Labor Day. The kids are back in school. People are back into their routines. The trouble for the Big 3 broadcast networks is that those routines don’t include watching their early-evening newscasts. Beyond that, last week was a pivotal week in Campaign 2010, with key primaries in New York, Delaware, New Hampshire, and several other states. As far as I know, Brian Williams, Diane Sawyer, and Katie Couric were firmly ensconced in their anchor chairs all week long. With all that, the Big 3 Nets’ audience for the weeks was less than 20 million, almost 5% lower than the same week a year ago, when there were no key election races. The Big 3 are not recovering from what was an awful summer. Here are the numbers (source: Media Bistro — Week of Sept. 13, 2010 ; week of Sept. 14, 2010 ): NBC and ABC both took huge hits in the 25-54 demographic groups, while CBS picked up a bit. If they expected their all-O’Donnell-bashing all-the-time strategy to translate into additional evening news viewers, early returns would seem to indicate that it’s not working out too well. Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com .

Read the original here:
Big 3 Nets’ Evening News Audience Fails to Break 20 Million in Mid-September