Kendall Jenner is the face or body that isn’t quite a body of lingerie brand La Perla – which is convenient because La Perla is owned by her modeling agency – who make a lot of money off of her…scamming the world into thinking she’s relevant, or hot, or important, and more than just a social media girl with a following who can push product like an AVON lady…. I don’t know what this farce of her modeling has gone on this long, this far, but I guess brand are scrambling dealing with social media personalities, but they should have just given her a sales code and let her be a seller for them…in their network marketing schemes because seeing her do all this “legit” which clearly isn’t legit work…is offensive..she’s not hot…she’s not interesting…she’s just a rich kid part of her family’s marketing company SCAMMING.. The post Kendall Jenner for La Perla of the Day appeared first on DrunkenStepFather.com .
I guess Kendall Jenner ‘s taking a quick break from pretending to be an athlete for Adidas to pretend to be a “professional” lingerie model again. And don’t get me wrong, I’m happy for Kendall that she gets to live out her dream. I just wish it involved wearing more actual lingerie. I mean, how else am I supposed to live out my dream of getting kicked out of every Starbucks bathroom in a 25 mile radius of my mom’s basement? You’ve got to give me more to work with here, Kendall.
It's not tacitly supporting smoking or that stupid nightmare of a Pepsi commercial , but yet another Kendall Jenner advertisement is getting backlash. Yes. Again . We have the video for you below so that you can decide for yourself whether this warrants outrage. Kendall Jenner has appeared in a short advertisement for Adidas. That sounds innocuous enough, right? But so did Pepsi. Adidas is a brand that caters to athletes but, obviously, plenty of people wear Adidas. The short, dramatic ad shared by Adidas' Twitter account looks fine on the surface. And then you look and see the backlash. (The angry comments absolutely refer to the Pepsi debacle) These tweets were direct responses to the Adidas tweet, but even so they did not mince words. “This is so pandering to a market you'll never have! So not 'original' back to Nike with Serena, Nadal and other real athletes. Pepsi got it.” We don't think that Adidas is replacing Serena or whatever. Companies can make lots of ads with lots of different people. They're not “cheating” on Serena Williams. But it seems that, to some of Adidas' more passionate fans, the brand represents something that Kendall cannot achieve. “To me, adidas means: athlete, fitness, committed to hard work; impressions not personified by k jenner. you're just another brand. yawn.” Well … they have a sense of brand loyalty. We'll give them that. (Also: Adidas is also a brand, folks) People seemed genuinely angry, even: “Kendall Jenner???? Really?!??? There is NOTHING original about having this ridiculous image front your brand…come on adidas!! Do better!!” The most needless dramatic one was this one: ” # adidasOriginalsxAW literally just threw out everything adidas i owned after the @ KendallJenner ad. Will never buy again” Some people misuse the word “literally,” but … it's entirely possible that this Twitter user was being literal. Of course, this is yet again a case of Kendall Jenner doing her job. She is a model. Her job is to model. The only reason that she seems to get the backlash rather than the companies that hire her is because she's famous on her own, and so also seems like a target for people's ire. Now, we're not saying that Kendall Jenner is blameless. She could refuse to take jobs — though that's not really great for your career. And Kendall and Kylie's terrible and disrespectful shirts were a different story, because that's a direct part of their brand instead of a gig for someone else. But Kendall didn't come up with this Adidas ad any more than she came up with that Pepsi commercial. She's a model, doing her job. Personally, I found the tone of this particular batch of backlash to be a little disturbing. There's a strong suggestion in those tweets that says that Kendall shouldn't do an Adidas commercial because she isn't an athlete. First of all, anybody can wear “athletic” brands, folks. You don't need to do yoga to wear yoga pants. Those tweeters were acting like Kendall was doing cultural appropriation (again). That does NOT apply to workout clothes, folks. Kendall doesn't have to spend her whole career selling perfume and sexy underwear (though she can if she likes). If models who aren't athletes can't sell athletic gear, what next? Will they make models who sell clothes actually wear clothes in the posters? We hope not.
It's not tacitly supporting smoking or that stupid nightmare of a Pepsi commercial , but yet another Kendall Jenner advertisement is getting backlash. Yes. Again . We have the video for you below so that you can decide for yourself whether this warrants outrage. Kendall Jenner has appeared in a short advertisement for Adidas. That sounds innocuous enough, right? But so did Pepsi. Adidas is a brand that caters to athletes but, obviously, plenty of people wear Adidas. The short, dramatic ad shared by Adidas' Twitter account looks fine on the surface. And then you look and see the backlash. (The angry comments absolutely refer to the Pepsi debacle) These tweets were direct responses to the Adidas tweet, but even so they did not mince words. “This is so pandering to a market you'll never have! So not 'original' back to Nike with Serena, Nadal and other real athletes. Pepsi got it.” We don't think that Adidas is replacing Serena or whatever. Companies can make lots of ads with lots of different people. They're not “cheating” on Serena Williams. But it seems that, to some of Adidas' more passionate fans, the brand represents something that Kendall cannot achieve. “To me, adidas means: athlete, fitness, committed to hard work; impressions not personified by k jenner. you're just another brand. yawn.” Well … they have a sense of brand loyalty. We'll give them that. (Also: Adidas is also a brand, folks) People seemed genuinely angry, even: “Kendall Jenner???? Really?!??? There is NOTHING original about having this ridiculous image front your brand…come on adidas!! Do better!!” The most needless dramatic one was this one: ” # adidasOriginalsxAW literally just threw out everything adidas i owned after the @ KendallJenner ad. Will never buy again” Some people misuse the word “literally,” but … it's entirely possible that this Twitter user was being literal. Of course, this is yet again a case of Kendall Jenner doing her job. She is a model. Her job is to model. The only reason that she seems to get the backlash rather than the companies that hire her is because she's famous on her own, and so also seems like a target for people's ire. Now, we're not saying that Kendall Jenner is blameless. She could refuse to take jobs — though that's not really great for your career. And Kendall and Kylie's terrible and disrespectful shirts were a different story, because that's a direct part of their brand instead of a gig for someone else. But Kendall didn't come up with this Adidas ad any more than she came up with that Pepsi commercial. She's a model, doing her job. Personally, I found the tone of this particular batch of backlash to be a little disturbing. There's a strong suggestion in those tweets that says that Kendall shouldn't do an Adidas commercial because she isn't an athlete. First of all, anybody can wear “athletic” brands, folks. You don't need to do yoga to wear yoga pants. Those tweeters were acting like Kendall was doing cultural appropriation (again). That does NOT apply to workout clothes, folks. Kendall doesn't have to spend her whole career selling perfume and sexy underwear (though she can if she likes). If models who aren't athletes can't sell athletic gear, what next? Will they make models who sell clothes actually wear clothes in the posters? We hope not.
This is just not Kendall Jenner’s year, is it? It seems like every single time she turns around, she makes another dumb choice that outrages the masses. At this point, it’s looking like the girl will literally never learn. First, Kendall agreed to be in that seriously stupid Pepsi commercial , the one that posed the theory that being handed a can of soda by a Jenner will bring about world peace. And sure, she didn’t write the commercial, but she did agree to star in it, which was a questionable choice at best. After that, she and Kylie Jenner, for some reason we still can’t quite understand, thought it would be cool to sell t-shirts featuring images of famous musicians superimposed with photos of their own faces . For a few ridiculous days, you could purchase a Notorious B.I.G. shirt that also featured Kendall’s image and that … was not right. Biggie’s mother threatened legal action, and we’re assuming the estates of some of the other artists featured on the shirts did as well. Kendall issued an apology , explaining that the shirts were “not well thought out” and that “it was not our intention to disrespect these cultural icons in any way.” But still, she and Kylie thought it was a good idea to sell those shirts … maybe just try thinking a little more next time? Unfortunately, thinking does not seem to be one of Kendall’s strong points. Yesterday, she shared a new photo of herself totally nude and lying on a table. The nudity was cool and all, but Kendall ruined it by holding a cigarette in her hand. In her caption, she explained “I don’t smoke,” but still, no one was impressed. It’s 2017: the vast majority of people don’t think smoking is cool, they don’t think it looks cool, and they’re not exactly down with models holding them to look cute or whatever. And the comments on the photo reflect that. As one person wrote, sure, Kendall says she doesn’t smoke, “but you make smoke look elegant and cool. What’s the difference then?” “So do you think it is cool to hold it in your hand?” another person asked her. “Very bad and thoughtless act.” One of her followers asked her to “Stop glamorizing smoking please. It is unhealthy and with this picutre, you make it seem as if it was a talent.” “Shame about the cigarette,” yet another person commented, “shame about advertising a drug that continues to kill, causes significant debilitation, causes health departments large proportions of their budget, prematurely ages you, can cause diabetes among many other things …” “Not to mention the damage cigarette butts have on our environment, particularly our wildlife. Holding a beautiful piece of fruit would have been far more beautiful.” View Slideshow: 21 Times Kendall Jenner Proved to Be the Real Deal Even one of her fans wrote “So pretty, you’re my favorite, so glad you don’t smoke but still wanted to get the little ones to think it’s cool. Too bad.” So far, Kendall hasn’t commented on the controversy, and chances are she won’t. But hopefully this time she’ll realize that it only takes a moment or two to actually consider what you’re doing before you do it.
When Warner Bros. and DC announced that Ben Affleck had been cast as Batman for the character’s latest cinematic reboot, the cries of fanboy dismay could be heard from all corners of the globe. That prickly Boston bro as the Dark Knight?! cried many of the same people who bitched about Heath Ledger being cast as the Joker, then later conceded it was the perfect choice. It was impossible to imagine. At the time, Affleck had already establised himself as a director of note, but for many, his acting still left something to be desired, and handing him the reins to one of the most iconic characters in all of pop culture just felt wrong. Then Zac Snyder’s Batman vs. Superman was released and the nay-saying social media trolls were … totally proven right for once. The movie was not good, and Affleck was not good in it. Sure, the film gave us the Sad Affleck meme and made a boatload of money for the studio, but it failed to generate the sort of critical buzz that successful, long-lasting franchises are built on. The original plan was for Affleck to follow up BvS by writing, directing and starring in a standalone Batman flick, like some kind of black molded rubber-clad Orson Welles, which is a hilarious image that we suggest you pause and reflect on. But now, it seems DC and Warners have abruptly changed course. First, Affleck was fired as director (or he “stepped down,” depending who you ask). Shortly thereafter, the new director, Matt Reeves, tossed his script in favor of an entirely new story. Now, according to The Hollywood Reporter , Affleck will be hanging up his cowl and passing the Caped Crusader on to someone new. The outlet claims that while the studio has yet to make an announcement, it currently seems very unlikely that Affleck will star in another Batman film. Insiders say the main issue is timing. DC has Shazam! and Suicide Squad 2 lined up as its next projects, which means The Batman (as the flick is tentatively titled) wouldn’t begin shooting until the final months of 2018 at the soonest. And that’s if Affleck is available to shoot at that time. Ben has a full dance card of his own these days, writing and directing the upcoming Agatha Christie adaptation Witness For the Prosecution and starring in a sequel to The Accountant , which is somehow a thing thats happening. (To say nothing of his new relationship with Lindsay Shookus , which probably takes up a good deal of his time these days.) All of this means that Affleck would likely be pushing 50 by the time the next Batman film hits theaters and on rare occasions, Hollywood dismisses men for their age, too. So it looks like we’ve seen the last of the Batfleck. He wasn’t the hero we deserved, but he was the hero who … eh, was fine considering the lack of better options, we guess.
Ashley Graham had previously dismissed the idea of a real, frontal nude shoot, casually ruling it out and crushing the hearts of countless admirers. We have never been so happy to see someone change their mind. We’re talking about a naked supermodel here, and she’s facing the camera, so if you’re ready to be hit in the face with some gorgeous nudity, look below. LOVE Magazine has done some of the most artsy, super weird photoshoots that we’ve ever seen. For the past three years, for example, Kendall Jenner has participated in the magazine’s LOVE Advent series each December. Kendall’s done things like posing with Cara Delevingne, but she’s also dressed in a shark costume and then stripped down to shower. Like we said, super weird while nonetheless artsy. So we can’t say that we’re surprised that the folks at LOVE are the ones who managed to get Ashley Graham to finally do some full frontal. (And no, we don’t mean Samantha Bee’s excellent show) Ashley Graham had previously stated that she wasn’t going to show her nipples or bush. And when Ashley Graham says that, we know that she literally means a pubic bush , as she’s part of a shrinking proportion of the population that prefers to keep their pubic hair. That’s her choice because it’s her (beautiful) flesh prison, and it’s every bit as valid as choosing to go without. (Or to just do some rigorous pube-scaping) Ashley Graham’s always been proud of her body, slamming body-shamers who thought that her gorgeous figure didn’t fit their idea of what a “model” should look like. We’ve even seen Ashley Graham naked before, but the camera angles and shadows ensured that there was no actual nudity. (That is, the photos were Instagram-appropriate) LOVE Magazine doesn’t mind some of the things that makes Instagram’s staff clutch their pearls, scandalized. For example, nipples. Sorry — Instagram’s fine with nipples, so long as they’re on a man. A woman’s nipples are somehow worse (or better?), to an “offensive” degree, so photos are often censored. LOVE has been known to flaunt those rules when posting their pics to Instagram, even knowing that photos will be deleted. (Just today, they posted a nude photo of the beautiful Emily Ratajkowski , showing both nipples and making it clear that Emily Ratajkowski does not sport a bush. Instagram, ever wary of the dreaded nip-nops, never appreciates that) Ashley Graham’s beauty is intense, even when she’s fully dressed. When she’s naked like this, her looks hit you like a hammer. In the best way. (Dang, girl) Okay, here you go — Ashley Graham’s beautiful, natural, naked self for LOVE Magazine . She’s so gorgeous. What a gift she is, to us and to the whole world. And good job to LOVE ‘s photographer, Patrick Demarchelier, because this is some A+ photography. Now we kind of can’t wait to see what LOVE is going to do for their LOVE Advent series this year. We hope that it’s just bonkers . And, ideally, more than a little sexy.
Bella Hadid posted a pictures of her shoving her tit in Kendall Jenner’s face because of #illuminati. This is how these rich girls conceptualize their world takeover and thank each other for helping each other trick the world into thinking they are relevant…because apparently they are….. It’s a little “titties in your face, we won at life, cuz our parents are rich and our siblings paved the way for us, all thanks to your help BFF”… Pretty garbage, but still a tits… The post Bella Hadid Titties in Kendall Jenner Face of the Day appeared first on DrunkenStepFather.com .
It’s not every day that a celebrity of Kim Kardashian’s standing has to scramble to shut down rumors over Twitter. But after fans noticed something suspicious and out-of-place in one of Kim’s Snapchat videos, the reality personality and social media star took to Twitter in an effort to quash the story before it could take off. We’ll see if that was enough to put the rumors to rest. … So, that looks like a run-of-the-mill still from yet another Kim Kardashian Snapchat video. She’s talking about her products dropping on the 17th and, you know, the usual Kardashian deal. Remember, the Kardashians kept pushing their products even through the explosive start to the Rob Kardashian-Blac Chyna feud . It’s kind of who they are, at this point. Kim’s also, very obviously, using a Snapchat filter that adds a flower crown … and makes her look like some sort of frightening apparition. (She can use whatever Snapchat filter she likes just like she can use whatever makeup she likes) (But … it looks how it looks, and people are entitled to opinions) So, that’s all business as usual … except, as some eagle-eyed fans noticed, for something that the mirror reveals. Look in the reflection, at that black countertop. Do you see the two streaks of what appears to be some sort of mysterious white powder? It’s in the corner, right over her shoulder. Some fans immediately wondered if they might be looking at a couple of lines of cocaine. Today, Kim took to Twitter in an effort to shut down the rumors before they can really take off. “I do not play with rumors like this so I’m gonna shut it down real quick.” She’ll try, at least. “That’s sugar from our candy mess from dylan’s candy shop.” So, somebody’s sugary treat of some variety left a pair of somewhat linear messes on that countertop, and she didn’t think anything of it and didn’t want to wait for a cleaning lady to take care of it before plugging her products. That’s … plausible, right? Now, the Kardashians aren’t a perfect lot. Khloe can be controlling, Kendall can be tone-deaf, Rob Kardashian may face criminal charges and his every move seems like an almost comical mistake by an unrelenting dumbass. But Kris Jenner didn’t raise her daughters to carelessly flash drugs on Snapchat, you know? And, if we’re being honest, coke doesn’t really seem like Kim’s style. (Is this where we make an obligatory joke about Kendall Jenner’s infamous Pepsi commercial ?) (Get it? Because … coke? You know what, never mind) Kim’s actually way less of a party girl than you’d think. She claims to not even like the taste of alcohol. (Though, like, you don’t have taste buds on the inside of your nose, but we get the idea) Also, those look a little spread out to be lines of coke. We feel like we might actually believe her here. It’s not that we’ve never been surprised before, but Kim seems too judgmental about even something as simple as drinking to be much of a coke fiend. (Though some people judge the hell out of others for drinking but don’t mind hard drugs, so you really never know) But, though it wouldn’t rule out her covering for someone else, it seems totally plausible that Kim Kardashian being a busybody is her biggest vice. Kim might regret her tweet, though. Sometimes nothing fuels rumors more than a denial. View Slideshow: Kim Kardashian on Kourtney Kardashian Birthday Party: Nipple Clamps, Nude Cartwheels and More!
Wednesday was Bikini Day! Plenty of people celebrated it as the most wonderful time of the year, because it’s July and if the entire Northern Hemisphere is going to be unbearably hot, then those of us who live here might as well make the most of it. Amy Schumer’s contribution to Bikini Day was a little late and a little unorthodox, and might surprise you (or not surprise you at all), depending on how well you know Amy Schumer. Amy Schumer’s brand is — well, it’s successful, for one thing. But she’s known for being funny. (Yes, we can all debate some of her jokes and comedy is subjective and blah-blah-blah, but she’s funny). She’s know for being irreverent. (A lot of comedy is) And she’s known for being body-positive. (With the possible exception of that time Amy Schumer body-shamed Khloe Kardashian for losing weight) We think that her Bikini Day photo really, truly represents her brand. Now, this is unusual in terms of bikini photos. It’s mostly the angle that’s unorthodox. Amy Schumer’s bikini photos in the past have been a little more traditional. And we suppose that by “traditional,” we in part mean “taken at flattering angles.” Some people look their best laying on their backs. (But don’t tell a coworker that because it will sound sexual and you will deservedly get in trouble) But every position in which you hold your body is going move things around, and maybe what makes your boobs look their best doesn’t do wonders for your butt. In this case, though, Amy Schumer’s somehow managing to lay down and also slouch at the exact same time. And yeah, it makes her abdomen look a little less smooth than usual. Perhaps more to the point, her legs are open, as if the camera’s about to investigate what she’s got going on under those bottoms. (If so, good for her!) But the end result is something that’s bound to grab attention. Which is about as on-brand as Amy Schumer gets. Though it used to seem like they were perfect together, Amy Schumer and Ben Hanisch broke up last month. That was a bit of a surprise — even we were taken aback. (And we can be a little cynical sometimes) But it just wasn’t expected, considering how much the two loved each other . On the plus side, maybe they’ll both find their perfect partners, somewhere out there. (Also, maybe we won’t be subject to any more too much information anecdotes about Amy Schumer’s oral sex habits … at least not in relation to Ben) (Like, we’re not prudes, but there’s a time and a place, okay?) Most people who take bikini photos of that nature are already so thoroughly settled down that they basically don’t care what people think of their bodies. Amy Schumer’s message is different. She’s not shy about showing her body for exactly what it is. (She’s not shy about anything , let’s be real) Besides, she knows that we’ve already all seen her more standard bikini pics. She still looks good in both photos. We wonder if her odd angle choice is going to catch on. You never know what’s going to set a weird trend. Maybe next year, or for the rest of the summer, Kendall Jenner’s bikini pics will be from that angle? Or maybe Emily Ratajkowski’s huge boobs won’t stop her from getting jobs when they appear a little flatter when she assumes the Schumer pose . But … probably not. View Slideshow: 17 Reasons Why We Adore Amy Schumer
