Tag Archives: kids

Jane Lynch Scores Supporting Actress Award At Emmys

‘Glee’ creator Ryan Murphy also takes home some hardware, for Best Direction of a Comedy. By Jocelyn Vena Jane Lynch accepts Outstanding Supporting Actress in a Comedy at 2010 Emmy Awards Photo: Kevin Winter/ Getty Images Jane Lynch won’t be throwing any slushees in the faces of Emmy voters this year. The woman who weekly terrorizes the kids of “Glee” as Sue Sylvester took home the statue for Outstanding Supporting Actress in a Comedy on Sunday night and seamlessly combined humor and true surprise in her acceptance speech. “Thank you so much,” she told the crowd from the stage, clutching her Emmy in a one-shoulder purple dress. “This is outlandish!” Lynch went on to thank her family and “Glee” co-stars in true Lynch-ian fashion. “I want to thank my parents on the South Side of Chicago for raising us to the sounds of musical theater and being so unintentionally hilarious,” she said in her speech. “I love being an actor. I love being an ensemble.” Later, recalling the calming spirituality of Buddhism, she joked, “Although I am not Buddhist, they do seem like a very calm people.” She had the audience in stitches when she said actors “have no choice or any marketable skills. I have to thank my lord and creator [‘Glee’ mastermind] Ryan Murphy for creating this role of a lifetime and the cast who are so young and fresh-faced, and when I’m not seething with jealousy, I’m so proud of you. And I love you my wife Laura and my little girl, Haden.” Later on, Murphy also snatched up a prize for Best Direction of a Comedy. In his speech, he shared with the room why he was inspired to make the show: “Thank you so much. I’m so shocked. I would like to thank Fox … Tom Ford for the tux, my beautiful cast, whom I love so much. ‘Glee’ is about the importance of arts education, so I would like to dedicate this to all my teachers who taught me to sing and finger-paint.” What did you think of Lynch’s win and acceptance speech? Share your thoughts in the comments!

Continue reading here:
Jane Lynch Scores Supporting Actress Award At Emmys

Taylor Swift’s ‘Mine’ Video Has Lots Of Time Travel

‘Time travel is horrible for the hair, but fun nonetheless,’ director Roman White jokes. By Jocelyn Vena, with reporting by Matt Elias Taylor Swift in her music video for “Mine” Photo: Big Machine Records Fans got a taste of what they can expect in Taylor Swift’s video for her Speak Now single, “Mine.” So far, we know she meets a cute boy (Toby Hemingway) and falls in love with him, and the two endure the ups and downs of being in love. The video’s director, Roman White, said that the clip features a lot of time travel, which would explain how those two crazy kids end up with kids of their own in the end. “There’s a lot of time travel in this video, which is fun,” he told MTV News. “No DeLoreans [referring to the movie ‘Back to the Future’]! Time travel is horrible for the hair, but fun nonetheless … It’s evolving their family story.” What fans might find most interesting in the clip is seeing Swift in a wedding dress, images of which were leaked online earlier this summer when Swift shot the video in Maine. “On the second day, we shot a lot of the stuff,” White explained. “The second day with her and Toby, [we shot] them moving in together, all of their stuff, where they’re kind of living their life, them with their kids, them having their huge argument, kind of the moment at the end. We shot the wedding shot, which is very interesting … those were the pictures that leaked first, which was very odd.” What viewers will notice most is the undeniable chemistry between Swift and her leading man, British actor Toby Hemingway , who was handpicked by Swift to star in the video. “She had mentioned Toby, so we started looking into him. He’s a really great actor,” White said. “They worked really well on camera [and] it’s always fun having someone around who’s British. It just makes everything sound cooler. It definitely comes off like they were a family. He was great to work with.”

Read the original here:
Taylor Swift’s ‘Mine’ Video Has Lots Of Time Travel

Jersey Shore Shop Owners Welcome Snooki And Company Back Home

‘You can’t pay for the exposure we’ve got,’ says Danny Merk, who owns the store where the cast worked in season one. By James Montgomery, with reporting by Ignacio Guzman Snooki Photo: MTV In addition to keeping local law enforcement busy ( really busy ), the stars of MTV’s “Jersey Shore” have also made an impact of a different sort on the town of Seaside Heights, New Jersey: an economic one. Seems business is booming on the boardwalk, especially now that the show is back in town to tape its third season . Seaside Heights Business Improvement District executive director Maria Maruca probably summed it up best when she told MTV News earlier this year that “we can’t even calculate the economic benefit” the show brings to the community. “There’s the curiosity factor,” she said. “Celebrities draw crowds. That’s going to give us an edge that we didn’t have before. The exposure that the show brought to Seaside Heights — when every late-night host is talking about Snooki, when Leonardo DiCaprio is talking about the show — we could never have afforded that type of media. This is more than we could ever have asked for.” So, determined to find out just how Snooki and company have helped out local businesses, we trekked out to the boardwalk and asked owners of some of Seaside’s best-known shops — some of which have already been featured prominently on the show. ” ‘Jersey Shore’ has helped Seaside Heights [in] both winter and summer. We get people coming in here every day looking for the cast,” said Michael Carbone, owner of the Beachcomber Bar and Grill (the same place where Snooki was hit last season). “You go down by the house, there’s a hundred people standing outside, every day. Business is up, the town is up. People come here for the ‘Jersey Shore.’ ” The Beachcomber benefits doubly, as it has a catering contract with MTV and, according to an NBC News report, serves thousands of meals for the 130 crew members who work on the “Shore.” “It’s helped everybody. Businesses in town, the motel owners, even the crew that makes the show have been patrons of my bar every night,” Carbone said. “We are hoping the show runs for years and years to come. … It’s a big craze, and it’s doing very well for everybody.” Those sentiments are echoed by Danny Merk, who owns the Shore Store, where the cast of the show (sorta) worked during season one. “It’s been busy in here all the time now. It’s great that I own a gift shop … people wanna buy little souvenirs. T-shirts. Little things, and this is the place to be at,” he said. “But it’s helped all the business on the boardwalk, because you can’t just shop at one store. … You can’t pay for the exposure we’ve got. “It came out of nowhere, [and] all of a sudden the kids came down here. They worked like average kids during the day, went out to the clubs at night,” he continued. “Now, it’s just nonstop. Everyone wants to see what they are doing. What did they do, what places they went to. They want to be like them. A lot of people just worship them.” Even though his store wasn’t featured on the show, Mike Rariden’s Adrenaline Body Piercing and Tattoo shop has definitely reaped the benefits of the toned (and tatted) “Jersey Shore” kids — even if he can’t seem to comprehend just why. ” ‘Jersey Shore’ has definitely brought a lot more people out than it has been in previous years. Everybody is trying to get in on the action, get on the show, meet the cast and crew,” he said. “They’ve definitely increased business a lot. … [There’s] a big population of younger kids that all look at Snooki as their hero. I don’t know why, but, hey.” Don’t miss “Jersey Shore” every Thursday at 10 p.m. ET/PT on MTV. Related Videos The Return Of ‘Jersey Shore’ Related Photos Jersey Shore (Season 2) | Snooki

Excerpt from:
Jersey Shore Shop Owners Welcome Snooki And Company Back Home

The Marijuana Lawyer of Orange County, California

Chris Glew in the best marijuana lawyer in the OC. added by: RubyVideo

Venezuela, more deadly than Iraq

CARACAS, Venezuela — Some here joke that they might be safer if they lived in Baghdad. The numbers bear them out. In Iraq, a country with about the same population as Venezuela, there were 4,644 civilian deaths from violence in 2009, according to Iraq Body Count; in Venezuela that year, the number of murders climbed above 16,000. Even Mexico’s infamous drug war has claimed fewer lives. Venezuelans have absorbed such grim statistics for years. Those with means have hidden their homes behind walls and hired foreign security experts to advise them on how to avoid kidnappings and killings. And rich and poor alike have resigned themselves to living with a murder rate that the opposition says remains low on the list of the government’s priorities. Then a front-page photograph in a leading independent newspaper — and the government’s reaction — shocked the nation, and rekindled public debate over violent crime. The photo in the paper, El Nacional, is unquestionably gory. It shows a dozen homicide victims strewn about the city’s largest morgue, just a sample of an unusually anarchic two-day stretch in this already perilous place. While many Venezuelans saw the picture as a sober reminder of their vulnerability and a chance to effect change, the government took a different stand. A court ordered the paper to stop publishing images of violence, as if that would quiet growing questions about why the government — despite proclaiming a revolution that heralds socialist values — has been unable to close the dangerous gap between rich and poor and make the country’s streets safer. “Forget the hundreds of children who die from stray bullets, or the kids who go through the horror of seeing their parents or older siblings killed before their eyes,” said Teodoro Petkoff, the editor of another newspaper here, mocking the court’s decision in a front-page editorial. “Their problem is the photograph.” Venezuela is struggling with a decade-long surge in homicides, with about 118,541 since President Hugo Ch

ABC Hides Identity of Liberal Activists Advocating for More Government Intervention in Business

Good Morning America’s Bianna Golodryga on Sunday featured a liberal activist arguing for more government intervention in the form of paid time off laws and “affordable” child care. The ABC host never identified Kristin Rowe-Finkbeiner’s ideology or the fact that she’s a  Huffington Post contributor. Instead, Golodryga fretted about “bias” against women who have children. The Rowe-Finkbeiner interview and the preceding segment lamented the fact that women who have children often don’t end up making as much as men and also females who don’t have kids. Neither segment even hinted that there could be two sides to the story. Instead, Rowe-Finkbeiner was allowed to lobby, “We know that passing family-friendly policies and programs like paid family leave, like affordable child care, like access to paid sick days, like access to flexible work options, those things actually help lower the gap between women and men.” Rowe-Finkbeiner’s blogs on the Huffington Post have advocated for a number of left-wing causes, including attacking Arizona for its tough immigration law. The segment also featured a woman by the name of Kiki Peppard. Golodryga explained: “Kiki Peppard spent a decade as a successful bookkeeper before taking leave to spend more time with her kids. But, when she went to reenter the work force after a divorce, she found herself on the outside looking in.” An ABC graphic blandly identified that Kiki “had a hard time finding work.” However, according to MomsRising.org , where Rowe-Finkbeiner is the executive director, Peppard has ties to the organization dating back to 2006. Golodryga also skipped this fact. Instead, she wondered, ” So, we heard Kiki’s story. How common and widespread are stories like hers? ” Rowe-Finkbeiner played dumb: “You know, I hear from women like Kiki everyday. Kiki is definitely not alone.” ABC on Sunday went way beyond being one-sided. Not identifying either of these women, their agendas and their connections is incredibly misleading. A transcript of the August 22 segment, which aired at 8:40 am EDT, follows: BIANNA GOLODRYGA: In America’s Jobs this morning, we’re going to look at the pay gap. The disparity between what men and women make has been shrinking over the years. And while it’s still not exactly equal, it is getting better, except for one particular group of women. They’re some of the most accomplished women in the world. Supreme Court justices. A former secretary of state. Even the head of Homeland Security. But, despite their widely varying political differences, they all have one thing in common: These woman don’t have children. And experts say, that fact may contribute directly to their success. According to the University of Chicago, men and women right out of school had nearly identical incomes and hours worked. But, 15 Years later, the men made 75 percent more than the women in the group. The only exception to the room? A small group of women who never had children. Their pay equaled the men. KIKI PEPPARD: There is such a double standard. GOLODRYGA: Kiki Peppard spent a decade as a successful bookkeeper before taking leave to spend more time with her kids. But, when she went to reenter the work force after a divorce, she found herself on the outside looking in. PEPPARD: The very first question asked me was, “Are you married?” And the second question was, “Do you have any children? This went on for the first 18 job interviews. On my19th job interview, they did not ask me about my marital status. They did not ask if I had children and hired me. GOLODRYGA: It’s long been assumed women make less than men because they have more career disruptions. But the unequal pay disparity also pits moms against non-moms. Women with kids are 44 percent less likely to be hired than women without. And they’re paid $11,000 less. And in this economy, that bias can be devastating to many families just trying to get by. And joining me now from Seattle to talk more about this is Kristin Rowe-Finkbeiner, the co-founder and executive director of MomRising.org. Good morning. Thanks for joining us, Kristin. KRISTIN ROWE-FINKBEINER (executive director, Momsrising.org): Good morning. GOLODRYGA: So, we heard Kiki’s story. How common and widespread are stories like hers? ROWE-FINKBEINER: You know, I hear from women like Kiki everyday. Kiki is definitely not alone. One of the thing is that this problem is bigger than most people realized. In fact, the maternal wall standing in the way of the glass ceiling. And here’s what it looks like: Women without children make 90 cents to a man’s dollar. Women with children make only 73 cents to a man’s dollar. So, this is a big discrepancy. And we have a big issue with pay discrimination against mothers. GOLODRYGA: So, when we hear statistics like that, what can be done to level out the playing field in the workforce? ROWE-FINKBEINER: Well, we have a big issue to address. And that’s that we have a 1950s work policy structure but we have a modern labor force. We’re now more than 50 percent of the labor force are women for the first time in history. But, that doesn’t mean we’ve reached full equality as we just heard in the segment. Because, right now, women and mothers are struggling. Moms are working full time and can’t put food on the table. In fact, one in four children in our nation are experiencing food scarcity in their households because of economic limitations, according to the USDA. So, the solutions are there. We have solutions. We know that passing family-friendly policies and programs like paid family leave, like affordable child care, like access to paid sick days, like access to flexible work options , those things actually help lower the gap between women and men. And they raise all boats. Because, it’s not just moms who need the policies, but everybody needs those policies in order to excel in their life, in the workplace and with their families. GOLODRYGA: But, now of all times, with the economy being so bumpy, with jobs being even more difficult to find, what should moms who are planning on taking time off do to avoid falling behind? ROWE-FINKBEINER: Well, professional women who decide to take time out of the labor force need to do four things. One, and most importantly, they really need to keep up with their professional contacts. Maintain those contacts so they have smooth sailing when they move back into the labor force. Two, they need to make sure that their professional accreditations are up to date while their out of the labor force. Three, this is really important. They need to find a mentor. Somebody who has navigated this interesting seas before and can help them navigate through. And fourth, one thing that’s very important is to find volunteer positions that you can put on the resume while you’re out of the labor force to show that you were productive while you were staying home with kids. Not that staying home with kids isn’t an important job in and of itself. Because it is. One of the things, though that is critically important to understand is that because we have a 1950s work policy structure in our nation still, we haven’t updated our policies like most other countries have, that most women can’t stay out of the labor force. So, we have a huge problem where we, you know, don’t have paid family leave, like 177 other countries do. And because of that, we see the implications on kids with a quarter of families with young children living in poverty. So, it’s important to recognize that not that many people can stay out of the labor force. GOLODRYGA: That is true, indeed. Especially in these times.

More:
ABC Hides Identity of Liberal Activists Advocating for More Government Intervention in Business

George Stephanopoulos Ignores Attack by Jennifer Aniston That O’Reilly ‘Insulted’ Single Mothers

Jennifer Aniston appeared on Thursday’s Good Morning America and slammed Bill O’Reilly for “insulting women.” The actress, promoting “The Switch,” her new film about being a single mother, complained about remarks by the Fox News host. Aniston derided, “[The comments were]  also saying something – insulting women that are out there doing this on their own. I was raised by – my mother was single. You know? ” [MP3 audio here .] In fact, O’Reilly, on his August 11 program , did not “insult” single mothers. He went out of his way to respect such moms: “I want to be fair about this, because there have- there are many- there are millions of single mothers who do a great job raising their kids.” What the FNC anchor did do was praise the importance of fathers: “Aniston can hire a battery of people to help her, but she cannot hire a dad…And Dads bring a psychology to children that is, in this society, I believe, under emphasized. I think men get hosed all day long in the parental arena.” He added, “…She’s throwing a message out to 12-year-olds and 13-year-olds, okay, that, hey, you don’t need a guy.” Stephanopoulos never challenged Aniston on her assertions. He only offered softball questions, such as wondering, “But usually you don’t respond to this kind of thing. Why did you decide to respond?” In fact, he ended up agreeing with Aniston’s assessment: “And you’re right. The movie is a celebration of family.” The ABC host only laughed at her snarky remark, “I was actually glorifying 12-year-olds going out there and getting knocked up and doing it by themselves. ‘Cause that’s what I like to preach.”  A transcript of Aniston’s comments on the August 19 Good Morning America: 8:15 GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: You caught the attention of Bill O’Reilly. Could you ever believe that was going to happen? He said you were glorifying- JENNIFER ANISTON: I never actually thought that my name and that name would ever be in one sentence, I must say. STEPHANOPOULOS: He basically said you were glorifying single motherhood and- ANISTON: I was actually glorifying 12-year-olds going out there and getting knocked up and doing it by themselves. ‘Cause that’s what I like to preach. That was one- STEPHANOPOULOS: [laughs] But usually you don’t respond to this kind of thing. Why did you decide to respond? ANISTON: I just felt it needed, it was begging for a response. It was just such an unfair statement that he made against me. And you know, people say things about me all the time, and you just kind of go “Oh, whatever.” But this was not just about me. It was also saying something – insulting women that are out there doing this on their own. I was raised by – my mother was single. You know? It doesn’t always start off that way. But sort of, life happens. STEPHANOPOULOS: And you’re right. The movie is a celebration of family. ANISTON: It is. It’s family. Here is a partial transcript of O’Reilly’s actual comments from the August 11, 2010 edition of the O’Reilly Factor: BILL O’REILLY: I want to be fair about this, because there have — there are many — there are millions of single mothers who do a great job raising their kids. MARGARET HOOVER: Do a great job. O’REILLY: And they’re abandoned and they’re all kinds — and they do. It’s possible. But it’s not optimum, and that’s where Ms. Aniston makes her mistake. That she’s throwing a message out to 12-year-olds and 13-year-olds, OK, that, hey, you don’t need a guy. You don’t need a Dad. Dad, ah, you know. That’s destructive to our society. GRETCHEN CARLSON: Because it’s — it’s tough to be a parent. I know. I have two kids at home, and trust me, I’m glad every day that I have a husband to help me with the hard work of being a parent. However, here’s the alarming statistic: 36 percent of all babies born in the U.S. now are born to single mothers. O’REILLY: Yes. They don’t — right. CARLSON: Thirty-six percent. But — and young people, you’re right. They do not have the cognitive ability… O’REILLY: I don’t like this trend. CARLSON: … to know the difference of a 40-year-old woman who’s financially stable having a child… O’REILLY: Yes. CARLSON: … and a 16-year-old girl. O’REILLY: Aniston can hire a battery of people to help her, but she cannot hire a dad. OK? And Dads bring a psychology to children that is, in this society, I believe, under emphasized. I think men get hosed all day long in the parental arena. HOOVER: Do you think they’ve earned it? Because I’ve got to tell you, of the 30 percent of single families, a full two thirds of them — no, I’m sorry, a full 80 percent of them are single families that are run by mothers, not fathers. O’REILLY: And any man who leaves their children is not a man. CARLSON: Well… O’REILLY: OK? Let’s make that perfectly clear. But the fathers who do try hard are underappreciated and diminished by people like Jennifer Aniston. HOOVER: Well, I think Jennifer Aniston is simply making a point. I agree she’s glamorizing single parenthood. O’REILLY: Diminishing — no. HOOVER: She’s glamorizing single parenthood, diminishing two-parent households. O’REILLY: Diminishing the role of the dad. CARLSON: She is.

See the original post here:
George Stephanopoulos Ignores Attack by Jennifer Aniston That O’Reilly ‘Insulted’ Single Mothers

Colorful, Durable, Unique Family Toys From LOUyLOU

Images: LOUyLOU Those ubiquitous plastic play-kitchens for kids may be a thing of the past, if massive recalls and a recent upsurge of interest in non-toxic, higher-quality toys mean anything. That’s why these vibrant play kitchens (made from empty olive cans) from Berlin-based “family project” LOUyLOU are especially appealing — they are uniquely handmade and have a nostalgic touch to them. But true to their motto “made f… Read the full story on TreeHugger

See the rest here:
Colorful, Durable, Unique Family Toys From LOUyLOU

MTV And Get Schooled Host ‘Waiting for ‘Superman’ ‘ Screening

MTV News’ Sway Calloway talks to students from Chicago youth groups about failing public schools, upcoming doc from ‘An Inconvenient Truth’ director. By Nick Neofitdis “Waiting For Superman” Photo: Paramount CHICAGO — The American education system is failing a large segment of the population. Need proof? The current generation of students will be less literate than the one before it, according to a new documentary. MTV teamed up with the Get Schooled campaign to host a screening this week in Chicago of “Waiting for ‘Superman.’ ” The upcoming doc from award-winning director Davis Guggenheim (“An Inconvenient Truth”) explores the flaws crippling some of America’s schools. Members of various Chicago youth groups were invited to the private screening and MTV News’ Sway Calloway moderated a post-screening talk. In the film, Davis gets into the reasons why many students face not only illiteracy issues but grim futures. Get Schooled is a national organization dedicated to promoting the importance of education and achieving goals like working with schools to increase high school and college graduation rates. The groupmembers in attendance, all of whom said they could relate to the troubling educational experiences depicted in the doc, expressed gratitude that someone was finally tackling the topic onscreen. “I thought the film was really great. It showed the problems in education are big but there are little steps that we can take to start addressing it,” said Royal, a student from the City Year organization. Many of the students echoed that sentiment, saying starting small could make a difference. “Right now, I have to start out small,” Jasmine said. “Helping my little sister and brother … by being a positive mentor for them and getting them in the proper mindset, like, ‘She came from [public schools], she’s doing it, we can do it too.’ ” A public high school dropout, Jasmine fought through the system and now attends college. She insisted that helping her younger siblings is her first step toward helping in a small-scale way. Another startling statistic revealed in the film is that a child who doesn’t finish high school will earn less and be eight times more likely to go to prison. It’s a claim that will no doubt spark more discussion, even heated debate, when the film gets its limited release on Sept 24. Whether you’re a student, graduate, sibling or parent, “Waiting for ‘Superman,’ ” will probably strike a nerve. For filmmaker Davis, the best outcome would be to get the country moving toward a solution, even if it is only one small step at a time. Do you think the American education system needs fixing? Share your thoughts with us in the comments.

See the rest here:
MTV And Get Schooled Host ‘Waiting for ‘Superman’ ‘ Screening

Exclusive: Raekwon Talks Justin Bieber Remix With Kanye West

‘I definitely didn’t give him anything that I thought was too hot to be spoken on by a 16-year-old,’ Rae tells MTV News. By Shaheem Reid Raekwon Photo: Getty Images Kanye West’s Twitter spawned one of the most talked-about (and unexpected ) musical collaborations in years — and the song was only finished Wednesday. West and Justin Bieber started talking on Twitter a few days ago about making a remix of the Biebs’ “Runaway Love.” ‘Ye suggested Raekwon get involved, and the next day, the Chef and the Louis Vuitton Don were in New York’s Electric Lady Studios knocking out verses. “Kanye was just being Kanye,” Rae told MTV News about the session. “He was definitely excited. The energy in the room was already speaking for itself. It was time to get up and have fun on the track together. We was drinking, laughing, being normal cats. At the same time, we had a houseful of celebrities in the house as well. [Kanye] was moving through the facility checking out the studios he had. He had three studios in there. “You had Akon in the building. Mos Def was just chillin’. Mos is a good friend of ‘Ye’s,” Rae added. “You had Charlie Wilson, the legendary cat from the Gap Band. Chris Rock walked in. These are guys that really respect who ‘Ye is. ‘Ye’s energy is cool. He’s a normal cat. A normal Chicago/world cat. Very mature. Having a great time.” Rae said his followers on Twitter alerted him that Kanye and JB were talking on their pages about collaborating and had brought his name up. He didn’t hesitate to let them know he wanted in. “This is a conversation that extended from the Twitter thing,” the Staten Island general explained. “Kanye was having a conversation with Justin over the Twitter. They came up with this great idea to have me involved. I was told to check it out and see what they talking about. They was right. They was saying, ‘This is something Kanye and Justin want to do.’ So automatically, first thing I do is hit them back and say I’m with it. Definitely, it created a movement. A lot of people want to see what could be the outcome to this remix. It’s definitely a hot remix.” For the past year, most of Rae’s accolades have been coming via his raw street music, most exemplified by 2009’s Only Built 4 Cuban Linx II LP. Obviously, Rae didn’t go into the “Pyrex Vision” or “Surgical Gloves” zone with his rhymes for Bieber’s fanbase. “All I did was ride the beat and listen to what he was singing to,” Chef said of his rhymes on the “Runaway Love” remix. “I can go basic when I want to. I can go rated R, I can go rated PG. I definitely didn’t give him anything that I thought was too hot to be spoken on by a 16-year-old. I know how to read beats, and listening to the record, I just complemented. At the end of my 16 [bars], when you do hear Justin coming, it fits and it’s a great sound. I didn’t go crazy. One thing people gotta recognize about me, I’m the Chef. I know how to make spicy food, I know how to make food that ain’t spicy. I made something that fit the criteria. “Me and Kanye are just here to sprinkle a little bit more love on this man’s success and all our success,” he added. Rae didn’t exactly have Bieber Fever before this collabo, but he respects the teen’s work. Chef said he recognized Bieber’s star quality and potential when he saw him perform last year. The MC hasn’t heard an entire Justin album yet, but his kids are big fans. The “Runaway Love” remix has also sparked the opportunity for more Raekwon/ Kanye West collaborations. “We sat down and we talked about it, we talked about doing things in the future. This is just the beginning,” the Wu-Tang co-founder revealed. “This is something that was supposed to happen a long time ago. He started throwing on them tracks, ideas started coming to my head. I was like, ‘If this cat produces a Rae and Ghost record, what could come out of it?’ Every album, he evolves. He’s always doing the extra, or absurd, the abnormal, but it sounds crazy.” Are you excited to hear the “Runaway Love” remix? Let us know in the comments! Related Artists Raekwon Justin Bieber Kanye West

The rest is here:
Exclusive: Raekwon Talks Justin Bieber Remix With Kanye West