Tag Archives: leading

Mike Kekich and Fritz Peterson Photo

According to a source, “Kekich is panic-stricken. He has moved away and has a new identity. He is freaked out those working on the movie found out where he is. He isn#39;t too keen on having that scandal dredged up again after all this time.” Unsurprisingly, Matt Damon will reportedly direct the film, as well as co-star alongside his “Good Will Hunting” buddy once again. As for the leading ladies in consideration, Naomi Watts, Rachel Weisz and Rebecca Hall are on the current short list. Former

Originally posted here:
Mike Kekich and Fritz Peterson Photo

Natalie Glebova and Paradorn Srichaphan split

FILE – In this April 24, 2007 file photo, Thailand#39;s tennis ace Paradorn Srichaphan, left, and his bride to be, Miss Universe 2005 Natalie Glebova of Canada embrace during a news conference in Bangkok as the couple announce their plans to marry later in 2007. The couple cited work commitments that kept them apart and said in a statement issued Thursday, Feb. 24, 2011 they decided to separate in July after three years of marriage. Former tennis star Paradorn Srichaphan and 2005 Miss Universe

Go here to read the rest:
Natalie Glebova and Paradorn Srichaphan split

Fairly Legal’s Sarah Shahi

More here:
Fairly Legal’s Sarah Shahi

‘Black Swan,’ ‘The King’s Speech’ Lead BAFTA Nominees

Golden Globe Award winners Natalie Portman and Colin Firth also received nominations for acting from the British TV and film organization. By Jocelyn Vena Natalie Portman Photo: Jim Spellman/WireImage Following the Golden Globes ceremony on Sunday night, the Brits wasted no time in announcing their nominees for the BAFTA Film Awards . Leading the pack of nominated films are the historical biopic “The King’s Speech” and Darren Aronofsky’s ballerina thriller, “Black Swan.” “The King’s Speech” tops the list with 14 nods, including one for its lead actor, Colin Firth, who picked up a Golden Globe for the role of King George VI. The film is also up against “Inception,” “The Social Network,” “True Grit” and “Black Swan,” which is the second-most nominated film at the BAFTAs. “The Social Network” took home Best Motion Picture – Drama at the Golden Globes. Firth is up against James Franco (“127 Hours”), Javier Bardem (“Biutiful”), Jeff Bridges (“True Grit”) and Jesse Eisenberg (“The Social Network”) in the Leading Actor category. Portman is up for her work in “Black Swan” in the Leading Actress category, in which she faces off against Annette Bening (“The Kids Are All Right”), Julianne Moore (“The Kids Are All Right”), Noomi Rapace (“The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo”) and Hailee Steinfeld (“True Grit”). Nominated for Best Director are Danny Boyle (“127 Hours”), Darren Aronofsky (“Black Swan”), Christopher Nolan (“Inception”), Tom Hooper (“The King’s Speech”) and David Fincher (“The Social Network”). Every year, the BAFTA hands out their Orange Wednesdays Rising Star Award to an up-and-comer voted on by the public. This year’s nominees are Gemma Arterton, Andrew Garfield, Tom Hardy, Aaron Johnson and Emma Stone. At last year’s show, Kristen Stewart took home the coveted award. For breaking news, celebrity columns, humor and more — updated around the clock — visit MTVMoviesBlog.com . Related Videos MTV Rough Cut: ‘The Social Network’ ‘The Social Network’ Clips MTV Rough Cut: ‘Black Swan’ Related Photos ‘Black Swan’

See the rest here:
‘Black Swan,’ ‘The King’s Speech’ Lead BAFTA Nominees

Does Your Favorite TV Show Violate Office Ethics?

Most likely! A new study conducted by Global Compliance — “the leading global provider of comprehensive, integrated ethics and compliance solutions, ranging from employee hotline services to harassment training to risk assessments, benchmarking, and inspection and validation services” — has found that most office workers depicted on television wouldn’t last five minutes in the real world of sexual harassment lawsuits. Can you guess which show constantly flouts office ethics most of all?

Read the original:
Does Your Favorite TV Show Violate Office Ethics?

The Verge: Bill Skarsgård

Look out: Here comes another Skarsgård. The fourth in the venerable Swedish acting clan to get into full-time acting after father Stellan and brothers Alexander and Gustaf (younger brother Valter may be right behind him), Bill Skarsgård arrived last week with his leading-man debut Behind Blue Skies , a ’70s-era coming-of-age tale about a Swedish teenager whose escape to a resort job yields first love, new responsibilities and — wait for it — his involvement in the biggest drug scandal in the nation’s history. Not a bad breakthrough for a kid who just few years ago used to think he’d wind up as a doctor. Movieline caught up with Skarsgård the day after the TIFF premiere of director Hannes Holm’s drama.

Read the original:
The Verge: Bill Skarsgård

Amanpour Uses ABC’s This Week to Continue Her Crusade to Smear America as Islamophobic and Tout Rauf’s Cause

ABC’s Christiane Amanpour used Sunday’s This Week to again shame Americans for their presumed irrational intolerance and Islamophobia as she railed against the ignorance of too many Americans, provided a friendly forum to Iman Faisal Abdul Rauf, whom she prompted to ridicule Sarah Palin, and then brought aboard a group of three “leading thinkers on faith” to “discuss religious tolerance and Islamophobia in America.” That brings Amanpour’s show tally to six guests in favor of the Ground Zero mosque versus zero opposed (four today, two on the August 22 program). Unmentioned by Amanpour or her guests: A report presented Friday by former 9/11 Commission Co-Chairs Tom Kean and Lee Hamilton about, according to Reuters , a needed “wake-up call about the radicalization of Muslims in the United States.” The report warned: “The U.S. is arguably now little different from Europe in terms of having a domestic terrorist problem involving immigrant and indigenous Muslims as well as converts to Islam.” At the top of Sunday’s show, Amanpour noted the 9/11 anniversary and used it to frame her agenda: “Nine years later, the growing hostility towards American Muslims.” In a lengthy set-up piece leading into Rauf, Amanpour fretted that “the plans to build an Islamic center close to Ground Zero have whipped up anti-Muslim sentiment” and insisted: “Not since 9/11 has the country seen such anti-Muslim fervor.” She asserted “Muslim-Americans are feeling vulnerable, with attacks on mosques in California, Wisconsin, and Tennessee. And the latest fuel poured on the fire, a threat to burn Korans…” And “these tumultuous events have created a global backlash. From Washington, to the Vatican, to Afghanistan.” She cued up Rauf: “Sarah Palin made a famous tweet saying please reconsider, the feelings are too raw. What did you think about that?” Rauf rejected the advice as he regurgitated Amanpour’s spin: “I thought it was disingenuous to a certain extent. The fact of the matter is, this has been used for political purposes and there’s growing Islamophobia in this country.” Amanpour tried to portray a nefarious trend: “In the latest poll that ABC’s conducted, only 37 percent of those who were asked expressed a positive feeling about Islam. Do you think that Muslims, people such as yourself, others here, can actually have a place to practice their religion freely, to live freely as Americans, given that figure? It’s the lowest figure since 2001.” But, it’s “the lowest figure since 2001″ by “just two points,” within the margin or error, ABC’s polling chief, Gary Langer, pointed out on ABCNews.com . Nonetheless, she empathized: “Do you think Muslims feel more afraid today, here in America, than they did right after 9/11?” She next set up her panel of “leading thinkers on faith” to “discuss religious tolerance and Islamophobia in America,” namely: “ Eboo Patel , he serves as an inter-faith adviser to the President, by Irshad Manji , author of The Trouble with Islam Today, and by Richard Cizik, founder of the New Evangelical Partnership for the Common Good.” Citing “this fervor that is being whipped up, this rising tide of anti-Islamic sentiment,” she highlighted a poll number that’s actually held steady since 2003: Eboo, you have done a lot in interfaith dialogue, trying to really build bridges here since the disaster of 9/11. What does this say to you, this fervor that is being whipped up, this rising tide of anti-Islamic sentiment in this country? Because let me read you, actually, some of the poll numbers which are interesting here. ‘Mainstream Islam encourages violence against non-Muslims.’ That was a question by ABC News and 31 percent of the respondents said yes. The next question, ‘do you have a good basic understanding of the teachings and beliefs of Islam?’ 55 percent of the respondents said no. So what has all your work done over the last nine years? Langer: “Just 54 percent call Islam a peaceful religion, while a substantial minority, 31 percent, thinks mainstream Islam encourages violence against non-Muslims. This view has held steady since 2003.” (Manji, while in favor of proceeding with Rauf’s project, is at least a critic of moderate Muslims for not doing more to denounce radical Islam.) From Thursday night: “ Amanpour Paints Rauf’s Protection Racket as ‘a Matter of Vital National Security ‘” My August 22 NB posting, “ Amanpour on One-Sided This Week: ‘Profound Questions About Religious Tolerance and Prejudice in the U.S .’” Amanpour’s set-up leading into the session with Rauf pre-recorded Thursday in New York City: CHRISTIANE AMANPOUR: As much as the President wanted to talk about the economy this week, he also found himself having to speak to the country about religious tolerance. Yesterday, at Pentagon ceremonies to observe the 9/11 anniversary, the President reminded Americans that they’re not at war with Islam. The plans to build an Islamic center close to Ground Zero have whipped up anti-Muslim sentiment to the extent that a pastor with a handful of followers can cause an international incident. In an ABC News poll released this week, nearly 50 percent of Americans say they have an unfavorable view of Islam now. Not since 9/11 has the country seen such anti-Muslim fervor. President Obama is now calling for religious tolerance, just as President Bush did in 2001. PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH, SEPT 17, 2001: The face of terror is not the true faith of Islam. That’s not what Islam is all about. Islam is peace. JOHN ESPOSITO, GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: America has a significant Muslim problem. And I think that what we’ve seen now really shows what is the tip of the iceberg. A reality that most people didn’t notice. Unleashed out of Manhattan, then becomes a series of acts, hates, protest. MAN: I feel like Islam has been under attack. WOMAN: I think there’s definitely an increased level of fear because it used to that we’d just walk around and be a normal citizen, a normal part of American society and now you get a lot more suspicion. PROTESTER: No mosque here! AMANPOUR: Muslim Americans are feeling vulnerable. With attacks on mosques in California, Wisconsin, and Tennessee. And the latest fuel poured on the fire, a threat to burn Korans by a fringe pastor with a flock of 30. I went to what’s become the flash point in this debate, the proposed Islamic center just blocks from Ground Zero where I found visitors from out of town. MAN: Certainly it’s a time to draw together, not do things that would divide us and make us more divisive. It sends the wrong message around the world. WOMAN: That is not America. That is not what Americans are about. AMANPOUR: And journalists from around the world. WOMAN: This whole thing is like a huge international issue. MAN, YELLING: We don’t have to agree with Islam. We have to agree on the constitution. WOMAN: I lost both my parents! AMANPOUR: These tumultuous events have created a global backlash. From Washington [Hillary Clinton], to the Vatican, to Afghanistan [Karzai]. ESPOSITO: We have two dangers right now. One is that the civil liberties of Muslim Americans will be even more eroded. Two, and more broadly, we will wake up one day and realize that the America we like to celebrate, you know the America we point to people around the world when we look down on them and say, we’re a democracy, we believe in pluralism, we believe in human rights. That, in fact, all of that, with the exception of this group. And that’s a very dangerous and slippery slope to go down. AMANPOUR: And in New York City yesterday, 9/11 ceremonies were marked by protests for and against plans to build that Islamic center nearby. The imam in charge of the project says that he has no intention of moving it right now, or of meeting with the controversial pastor who wants to burn Korans. I sat down for an exclusive interview with Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf.

See the article here:
Amanpour Uses ABC’s This Week to Continue Her Crusade to Smear America as Islamophobic and Tout Rauf’s Cause

Bob Schieffer Bashes Boehner for Smoking and Taking Tobacco Money

President Obama and the Democrats began a full court press this week smearing House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Oh.), and CBS’s Bob Schieffer made it crystal clear Sunday that he’s going to do his part to stop the Ohio Congressman from replacing Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) as Speaker in January. In a hard-hitting interview about a variety of subjects on “Face the Nation,” Schieffer actually hammered his guest for smoking cigarettes and taking campaign contributions from the tobacco industry. “How do you square that with the fact that cigarette smoking is the leading cause of preventable deaths in this country; 435,000 people — their deaths are linked to cancer. That`s one in five,” scolded Schieffer. “How do you justify that in your own mind?” (video follows with transcript and commentary):   BOB SCHIEFFER, HOST: Mr. Boehner, I`m going to ask you this question because I`m not objective about this. I`m — I`m a cancer survivor. I used to be a heavy smoker. Do you still smoke? JOHN BOEHNER, HOUSE MINORITY LEADER (R-OHIO): I do. SCHIEFFER: You have taken $340,000 from the tobacco industry. They`ve been the largest contributor to your political campaigns over the year. How do you square that with the fact that cigarette smoking is the leading cause of preventable deaths in this country; 435,000 people — their deaths are linked to cancer. That`s one in five. How do you — how do you justify that in your own mind? BOEHNER: Bob, tobacco is a legal product in America. And the American people have the right to decide for themselves whether they want to partake or not. There are lots of things that we deal with and come in contact with every day, from alcohol to food to cigarettes, a lot of things that aren`t good for our health. But the American people ought to have the right to make those decisions on their own. SCHIEFFER: Well, I mean, they have a right to shoot themselves if they choose to. Actually, Bob, suicide is against the law in America. Nice try!  SCHIEFFER: But, I mean, shouldn`t we do something to try to encourage them not to? I mean, do you think that`s a good example? BOEHNER: Well, listen, I wish I didn`t have this bad habit. And it is a bad habit. You`ve had it. You`ve dealt with it. But it`s something that I choose to do. And, you know, at some point maybe I`ll decide I`ve had enough of it. SCHIEFFER: Well, I mean, if you should become speaker, you could set a good example for the country by saying, I`m going to try to stop smoking. Maybe you could get the president. I understand he smokes too. Maybe the two of you could find a way to try to stop smoking. That would be kind of a good thing, wouldn`t it? BOEHNER: Bob, I appreciate your suggestion. The hypocrisy on display here was astounding. After all, as Schieffer noted, Barack Obama is a cigarette smoker. But something Schieffer didn’t mention was that in 2008, Obama took more money from the tobacco industry than Boehner did . Yet, according to LexisNexis, Schieffer has never scolded Obama for his smoking or asked him to quit in order to “set a good example.”  Why might that be, Mr. Schieffer? Is this something else you’re not “objective about?” 

Read more:
Bob Schieffer Bashes Boehner for Smoking and Taking Tobacco Money

Paul Conrad Dies at 86 | Pulitizer Prize-Winning Political Cartoonist Made Him One of Leading Provocateurs | Helped Push The Los Angeles Times to National Prominence

Political cartoonist Paul Conrad dies By James Rainey | 12:52 p.m. His fiercely confrontational cartoons made him one of the leading political provocateurs of the second half of the 20th century and helped push the Times to national prominence. He was 86. ' Paul Conrad dies at 86; Pulitzer Prize-winning political cartoonist helped bring The Los Angeles Times to national prominence http://www.latimes.com/news/obituaries/la-me-paul-conrad-20100905,0,3650589,full… . PART ONE… By James Rainey, Los Angeles Times September 4, 2010|12:52 p.m. Paul Conrad, whose fiercely confrontational editorial cartoons made him one of the leading political provocateurs of the second half of the 20th century and who helped push the Los Angeles Times to national prominence, has died. He was 86. Conrad died early Saturday of natural causes, surrounded by his family at his home in Rancho Palos Verdes, said his son David. Conrad won three Pulitzer Prizes, a feat matched by only two other cartoonists in the post- World War II era, while both thrilling and infuriating readers for more than 50 years with an unyielding liberal stance, rendered in savage black and white. Mayors, governors and presidents cringed at the prospect of being on the business end of Conrad's searing pen, while many Southern Californians made him their first stop as they sifted through The Times, the newspaper that was his principal home for nearly 30 years. While many other cartoonists angled for whimsy or the easy one-off, Conrad “specialized in hair shirts and jeremiads and harpoons to the heart,” former Times Editor Shelby Coffey III once wrote. The cartoonist, loud and often profane in person, viewed himself as a champion of the common man and relished combat with those he saw as protectors of the rich and privileged. His most prominent and enduring foils came in the person of two California politicians who rose to the presidency, Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan. The scandal-plagued Nixon named Conrad to his “enemies list” — a designation the cartoonist described as one of his greatest honors. Former Times Publisher Otis Chandler became accustomed to his breakfast being interrupted by either Reagan or wife Nancy, furious that the then-governor had been depicted, again, as dimwitted, mean-spirited or out of touch. “Conrad is … more than a legend in cartooning and an institution in American journalism,” Doug Marlette, one of many cartoonists inspired by that work, once said. “He is a force of nature; you measure Conrad on the Richter scale.” The author and essayist Pete Hamill called Conrad “a voice. And the voice is his alone: alternately savage, compassionate, brutal and ironic.” Conrad rose to prominence in a post-World War II era when many newspapers were at the height of their power and when he and other widely syndicated editorial cartoonists — including Herbert L. Block (Herblock), Bill Mauldin and Pat Oliphant—held a particular grip on the American psyche. Just before his death in 2007, the onetime editor of The Times' editorial pages, Anthony Day, worried that the skittish and contracting newspaper industry would no longer support a “genius” like Conrad. “It's easier to not make trouble,” Day said, “than to make trouble.” And Conrad loved making trouble. His righteous indignation was guided by a modest Midwestern upbringing, an abiding Catholic faith and what one chronicler called “a fanatic heart.” Many journalists like to talk of the imperative of afflicting the comfortable and comforting the afflicted. Conrad embraced the credo with abandon. “Don't ever accuse me,” he liked to say, “of being objective.” CONTINUED… added by: EthicalVegan

REVIEW: Lottery Ticket Trades Its Urban Nerve for Easy Charm

Erik White wanted the housing projects in Lottery Ticket , his fractious wish-fulfillment comedy, to look like an “Everywhere, USA ” that would be relatable to all. Though he envisioned the story taking place in his hometown of New York City, circumstance led him to shoot in Atlanta, Georgia, largely on a complex of soon-to-be demolished projects with a pink-bricked, benignly institutional look. He carefully shot around any identifying signs or landmarks, ensuring that his generic, non-specific, ultimately unsatisfying take on a bullet-proof concept — an 18-year-old Foot Locker employee wins the lottery but is forced to wait out a long weekend within the cutthroat ecosystem of his community before he can claim the prize — is reflected in its hermetic, alienating aesthetic.

Read more from the original source:
REVIEW: Lottery Ticket Trades Its Urban Nerve for Easy Charm