Tag Archives: legislature

Social Blade Interview: Medical Marijuana And Legalization

I was honored to be the guest on Social Blade Episode 28, February 12, 2010. For the first time ever, the cutting-edge social media show takes on the topic of cannabis. Go to 42:30 in the video for the beginning of a discussion of medical marijuana and marijuana law reform. Many thanks to hosts Patrick Parise, Victor Barrera, and Jason Urgo for having me on and for being so hospitable. I enjoyed the chance to get the word out!

Follow this link:
Social Blade Interview: Medical Marijuana And Legalization

Washington Legislature Says No To Pot, Yes To ‘Continued Chaos’

By Steve Elliott in Toke of the Town Graphic: The Seattle Times The Legislature in Washington state displayed a trait Wednesday for which they are becoming well known: spinelessness, especially when it comes to marijuana law reform. Despite the fact that a majority of state voters favor legalizing pot, cowardly politicians in the State House voted down a pair of bills aimed at changing Washington’s failed marijuana laws. House Bill 2401 would have legalized and regulated the adult production, use and distribution of marijuana, in a manner similar to the regulation of alcohol. The roll call vote on HB 2401, to legalize marijuana, went like this: Hurst (D) Chair – N O’Brien (D) Vice Chair – N Pearson (R) – N Klippert (R) – N Appleton (D) – Y Goodman (D) – Y Kirby (D) – N Ross (R) – N House Bill 1177 was a more limited piece of legislation. It would have reclassified minor marijuana possession cases (less than 40 grams) from a criminal misdemeanor to a fine-only civil infraction. This policy, known as decriminalization, is already the law in more than a dozen states. The roll call vote on HB 1177, to decriminalize marijuana: Hurst (D) Chair – N O’Brien (D) Vice Chair – Y Pearson (R) – N Klippert (R) – N Appleton (D) – Y Goodman (D) – Y Kirby (D) – N Ross (R) – N The legislative defeats for HB 2401 and HB 1177 came despite nearly two hours of public testimony, nearly all of which was in support of one or both bills. One light shining brightly in the darkness was Democrat Rep. Roger Goodman, who showed the kind of leadership that seems all too rare in the Washington Legislature these days. “A ‘no’ vote… is a vote for prohibition and the illegal markets that it spawns,” Goodman said. “A ‘yes’ vote is a vote for control… A ‘no’ vote is a vote for continued chaos.”​ Photo: NORML NORML’s Paul Armentano: “They say that the will of politicians often lags behind the sentiment of the public. Nowhere is this adage more clear than when it comes to marijuana law reform.” Courtesy of Paul Armentano , deputy director at the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML), here are some of the lame excuses legislators gave for voting “no” to marijuana reforms. Democrat Chris Hurst, committee chair, claimed that as a state lawmaker he is sworn to uphold both state and federal law. Ex-cop Hurst claimed that both proposals would be in violation of the federal Controlled Substances Act. (As pointed out by Armentano , neighboring Oregon was the first state to decriminalize marijuana, in 1973, and has never run afoul of federal law. Additionally, the governments of New Mexico, Rhode Island, Maine and now New Jersey have licensed, or will soon license, the production and distribution of medical marijuana without incident.) “As a law enforcement officer… on countless occasions I’ve seen the negative effects of marijuana on people’s lives,” Republican Brad Klippert said. I would imagine he has, as a law enforcement officer busting people for pot. That’s a negative effect of the marijuana laws, though, Brad, not of marijuana itself. (And as Armentano points out, Klippert’s “logic” could also be used to outlaw alcohol, tobacco, and fatty foods.) Republican Kirk Pearson claimed that just by talking about the bills, they were encouraging teens to try marijuana (who knew the Legislature had such influence?). “I don’t want to do anything today that would make drug use seem safer to teenagers,” Pearson said. (Oh, like telling the truth about marijuana? That wouldn’t do, now would it? Additionally, as Armentano points out, by Pearson’s own logic he should just shut the hell up.) Democrat Steve Kirby claimed he really, truly does support the reforms, in theory, but then, weirdly and inexplicably, claimed that such changes in policy “require a vote of the public,” not action by the Legislature. (As Armentano reasonably points out, marijuana prohibition was not enacted by a vote of the public.) Ultimately, though, that public vote on marijuana may take place this November in Washington. NORML Legal Committee member, activist/lawyer Douglas Hiatt of Seattle has filed a voter initiative to legalize cannabis in the state. If Sensible Washington’s petition signature drive is successful, Washingtonians will get a chance to vote on legalization on the November 2010 ballot. A recent statewide poll shows that if the election were held today, pot would be legalized, with 56 percent of the vote.

More here:
Washington Legislature Says No To Pot, Yes To ‘Continued Chaos’

Washington Lawmakers Snuff Out Marijuana Legalization Bill

By Steve Elliott in Toke of the Town ​If marijuana is going to be legalized in Washington this year, it will have to be the voters who do it — because the Legislature won’t. The House Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Committee is expected to vote down bills dealing with legalization and decriminalization of marijuana, reports Jerry Cornfield at the Everett Herald Net . Rep. Chris Hurst, chairman of the public safety panel, told Cornfield there aren’t enough votes to move either bill out of committee. While amendments to either bill or both could be proposed Wednesday, Hurst said he doesn’t believe enough minds will change to alter the outcome. With five Democrats and three Republicans on the committee — and two of the Democrats (Hurst and Rep. Al O’Brien, D-Mountalke Terrace) being former cops, with both saying they will oppose the bills — neither will likely make it out of committee. Hurst said votes could have been taken last week at the end of a two-hour hearing on the legislation. Sponsors of the bills asked for time to consider possible changes, in response to criticisms raised in the hearing. Hurst claims he’s pushing to get the matter resolved (as in, hurry up and get these bills killed) to give backers of a voter initiative for marijuana legalization “a clear field” on which to wage their battle. Many observers of the Washington state political scene believe that blame for the marijuana bills are once again dying in the Legislature due may be rightly placed on Speaker of the House Frank Chopp . According to multiple, well-placed sources (both inside the Legislature and those observing), Chopp, through a lack of political will and leadership, is the legislator most responsible for the death of marijuana decrim in the last session as well. A reliable inside source, in a position to know, tells Toke of the Town Chopp doesn’t want to force a “controversial” marijuana decrim vote by the entire Legislature, because he doesn’t want to force fellow Democrats (in the majority) to vote on pot any time before the 2010 elections. Chopp’s leadership style, or lack thereof, has been a growing source of controversy within progressive Democrats for some time now. Over and over, you see Chopp described as “the most powerful politician in the state,” but you’d never guess it from his unwillingness to go out on a limb , to take a stand, to have a backbone. A Washington State Senate bill decriminalizing marijuana is still alive, though no hearings on it have been scheduled as of Tuesday morning.

See the article here:
Washington Lawmakers Snuff Out Marijuana Legalization Bill

Dope Of The Day: Police Chief Calls Marijuana Legalization ‘Nonsense’

Calm down, Chief. It’s just pot. Port Orchard, Wash., Police Chief Al Townsend is against legalizing pot, and he’s called a new bill to legalize marijuana in the state “ludicrous.” “If the goal of the bill is to legalize marijuana for the purpose of generating tax revenue, that’s ridiculous,” Townsend wrote in an email to Kitsap Sun crime reporter Josh Farley. Chief Townsend calls into question the judgment of his fellow Kitsap Countian, Rep. Sherry Appleton (D-Poulsbo), one of the co-sponsors of HB 2401 , which would legalize marijuana for persons 21 and older. Police Chief: Legalization Would ‘Encourage New Users’ “If [Appleton] isn’t proposing that we encourage new users of marijuana, which is clearly debatable here, I’m fairly sure that those who are growing and using marijuana in violation of the laws right now won’t have a problem continuing to do so while now avoiding any tax payments or tax laws,” he wrote. OK, chief, since you say it’s “clearly debatable,” I’m taking you up on your word and debating with you. So you believe legalization would “encourage new users of marijuana”? We are all certainly entitled to our own opinions. But we are not, Chief, entitled to our own facts. And the facts are, in countries such as the Netherlands where marijuana has been decriminalized, lifetime prevalence of marijuana u s e is less than half that of the United States (17 percent for the Netherlands vs. 37 percent for the U.S.). Clearly, American pot laws haven’t stopped people from using marijuana — and clearly, Dutch decrim hasn’t encouraged more people to smoke pot. So much for the “encourage new users” argument. You’re going to have to do better than that. The Tax Thing zazzle.com ​Chief, you point out that under the current system (of which you apparently approve), marijuana users and growers don’t pay any taxes on pot, and under legalization, pot would be taxed. You are absolutely correct sir, and on this point have a firm grip on the facts. Too bad those facts are absolutely one of the best pro-legalization arguments. Most marijuana users would love to pay taxes on their pot, if it meant they never, ever again had to worry about well-meaning but pot-hating cops, like, well, like you , Chief. They’d gladly pay taxes if it meant they’d never again have to worry about you kicking in their doors, taking their children and their homes, and putting them in jail for nothing more than marijuana. I’d wager you’ll never see a happier bunch of folks about having to pay a new tax, as marijuana users will be when (when, not if) it is legalized. We want to contribute to society and we’ll be tickled to death when we’re admitted to it as full, dues-paying members rather than viewed as outlaws. Here’s That Damn “Gateway” Again… ​Chief, I see by Josh’s blog that you’re also worried about marijuana as a “gateway” drug to other controlled substances. Gateway drug? Please. If you really want us to be scared of marijuana, you’re going to need to find something that hasn’t been disproved . “In the United States, the claim that marijuana acts as a gateway to the use of other drugs serves mainly as a rhetorical tool for frightening Americans into believing that winning the war against heroin and cocaine requires waging a battle against the casual use of marijuana,” wrote John P. Morgan, M.D., and Lynn Zimmer, Ph.D., two of the foremost researchers in the field, who call the gateway claim “intellectually indefensible.” A 2002 Canadian Senate Committee report states that the gateway theory “has not been validated by empirical research and is considered outdated.” There… Is that the “debate” you were wanting to have? Chief, next time, I’d suggest maybe you get your facts straight before making a public spectacle of yourself. (Isn’t there a “public nuisance” law? Just sayin’.) …And Those Dangerous Doped-Up Drivers Photo: www.ridelust.com ​Chief, I see that you believe that legalization would make our roadways more dangerous because more people would be high while driving. First of all, legalizing marijuana would not make it legal to drive while impaired, any more than legalizing alcohol made it legal to drive while drinking. But here’s the thing: People who are inclined to get high and drive are already getting high and driving, and have been for decades. Risk takers take risks. However, according to scientists, there is in fact ” no compelling evidence that marijuana contributes substantially to traffic accidents and fatalities.” Nobody’s suggesting that it’s a great idea to take bong rips and hit the freeway. But you can bet your ass that if marijuana really did cause automobile accidents like, say, alcohol, that it would be obvious as hell. And you think maybe that would get some major media attention if it happened, right? Well, it would. If marijuana caused half as many accidents as alcohol — even a fourth or a tenth as many — it would get enormous coverage, and pot would never stand a chance of being legalized. You know the reason we’re even having this conversation, Chief? Because people know pot’s not that dangerous. They’ve stopped believing you, Chief. It’s time to move on. With estimates of current marijuana users in the United States varying between 40 and 100 million, you can bet that if weed really caused wrecks, it’d be a national tragedy on the level of drunk driving. It doesn’t. It’s not. Case closed. Legalization ‘Nonsense’? “I was under the impression that Ms. Appleton was in the Legislature representing the best interests of the majority of her constituents,” Chief Townsend wrote. “This obviously isn’t the case here. The bill is ludicrous. And frankly its [sic] disappointing that a member of our Legislature that was elected by the majority of the people in her district is using our time and our tax dollars generating this kind of nonsense.” Hmm… Chief? Speaking of our time and tax dollars, I hope you weren’t “on the clock” when you wrote this. Because I really don’t think it’s a good idea for you to bring up “our time and our tax dollars” in a discussion about marijuana. Do you really want to talk about “our tax dollars” and how they fund your futile fight against pot? What sort of a return are we getting on that investment, Chief? What good does it do society, here in Kitsap County or anywhere else, to arrest marijuana smokers and put them in jail? What you’re doing is removing productive members of society and putting them in jail where they are a drain on taxpayer dollars instead of contributing. And all those arrests, all those jobs lost, homes lost, families lost — do they make any difference? Absolutely not, Chief. The most extensive study ever done on the subject shows that marijuana arrests have no impact on usage — NO IMPACT. The report further finds that current penalty structures act as a price support mechanism that boosts the illegal market. What do you think of that, Chief? Every day you spend enforcing the marijuana laws, you are doing a BIG favor to those who profit greatly from the black market — and don’t have to pay any taxes on it. I’m sure they’d tell you “thank you” if they could. Photo: www.texomak-9.com ​Since you seem so concerned, Chief, about the tax dollars Rep. Appleton might spend in the course of doing her job (and the majority of Washingtonians and Kitsap County residents support her on the marijuana issue), maybe we should be concerned about the tax dollars you spend doing yours. Specifically, why don’t we talk about the tax dollars wasted on marijuana enforcement — again, having no impact on usage? That big study we mentioned before, Chief, remember? It showed that we waste almost $170 million a year arresting people for marijuana in Washington. How much of that tax money do we waste in Kitsap, Chief? How much do you waste in Port Orchard? And why is it so important that you keep wasting it, again? Talk about “nonsense”… Crown This Man Chief, for your complete disregard for the facts about marijuana, your cavalier dismissal of the will of the people, and especially your callow, unwarranted disrespect for our esteemed leader and legislator Sherry Appleton, Toke of the Town unreservedly, enthusiastically and wholeheartedly awards you the prestigious Dope of the Day Award! Wear that crown proudly, Chief. You’ve earned it. ……. Editor’s note: OK folks, I know you wanna email Chief Townsend to congratulate him on this “high” honor. You can do so by clicking right here : policechief@cityofportorchard.us ……. More Information About Wasted Tax Dollars Marijuana in Washington: Arrests, Usage, and Related Data (PDF) ……. Read the original post at the new Village Voice Media cannabis blog, Toke of the Town : Dope Of The Day: Police Chief Calls Marijuana Legalization ‘Nonsense’

Excerpt from:
Dope Of The Day: Police Chief Calls Marijuana Legalization ‘Nonsense’

Bill To Legalize Marijuana Introduced In Washington Legislature

By Steve Elliott in Toke of the Town Photo: Public Domain Federal government pot farm at the University of Mississippi, Oxford, MS. Under Washington state’s proposed legalization bill, pot would be grown by state-licensed farmers and sold only through state liquor stores. ​ Washington state pot advocates who thought they had to choose between a marijuana decrim bill ($100 fine for under 40 grams) and the status quo (including a mandatory night in jail for possessing any amount) just got another choice. A state lawmaker introduced a bill Monday to legalize marijuana in the state. Under the bill, introduced by Rep. Mary Lou Dickerson (D-Seattle), marijuana would be legal for persons 21 and older to use and possess, subject to regulations similar to those controlling alcohol. housedemocrats.wa.gov Rep. Mary Lou Dickerson: Making the Evergreen State a little greener Dickerson said she doesn’t expect the bill the bill to pass. “I’m happy to start the conversation,” she told Seattle political site PubliCola . “If more states start talking about [legalizing marijuana] it will get the attention of Congress.” Dickerson wants the legal pot to be grown by Washington farmers and sold in state liquor stores. Revenue from marijuana sales would pay for drug and alcohol treatment programs. Cannabis revenues will probably be comparable to those for alcohol, Dickerson said, which are at about $330 million yearly in Washington. Rep. Dickerson has five co-sponsors for the legislation so far: Reps. Scott White, Roger Goodman, Dave Upthegrove, Sherry Appleton and Mary Roberts, all Democrats. HB 2401 was introduced Monday in advance of the next legislative session in January. “This bill is a wonderful step forward for health, human rights, and social justice,” marijuana researcher Dr. Sunil Aggarwal of Seattle told Toke of the Town . “No one should be criminalized for using marijuana, when far more dangerous drugs such as malt liquor are legally consumed. There should be equal rights for those who choose to consume cannabis.” “With the likes of Roger Goodman and the work that he’s done over the years with the King County Bar Association Drug Policy Project , this bill really has a chance,” said local activist Allison Bigelow. Photo: Joe Mabel Patient/activist Vivian McPeak: The conversion to a mainstream commodity is going to be awkward ​But longtime marijuana patient/activist and Seattle Hempfest organizer Vivian McPeak expressed mixed feelings about the prospect of legalization. “The conversion from an illicit, underground substance to a mainstream commodity is going to be an awkward transition for many who have been involved with the cannabis culture for some time,” he told Toke of the Town . “It is going to be difficult for many pot scene old timers to let go of the cultural hold so many of us have on our old friend, the herb,” McPeak told us. Is The Perfect The Enemy Of The Good? With just about any piece of legislation, it’s not hard to find areas of concern once you start examining the wording, and HB 2401 is no exception. One worrisome aspect of the bill is that nobody, with the exception of farmers licensed to sell pot to the state, would be allowed to grow their own. The language of the bill seems to outlaw all personal grows, keeping it illegal to grow, keep or transfer marijuana outside of liquor control board rules and licensing. Cultivation of any amount for personal use, then, would apparently be prohibited. And the way I read it, your house or property could be seized if you had five or more plants — which is not how I had pictured “legalization.” SAFER Marijuana is safer. Why are we supposed to pretend it isn’t? ​There’s also the quibble, minor though it may seem at this stage of the game, that treating marijuana almost exactly like alcohol errs because the potential for abuse, addiction and accidents are so much greater with booze. No arguing with that — just ask Mason Tvert over at SAFER ; he’ll tell you. “It is very hard for me to embrace the idea of treating cannabis as alcohol, because there is just no comparison between the two substances as far as impairment, health effects, and addiction,” McPeak told Toke of the Town . “Perhaps this is the model we must use to change the dominant paradigm, but I feel we should fight tooth and nail to have cannabis put into its own unique classification,” McPeak told us. “Simply compare death rates associated with the two substances and you’ll see they do not belong in the same category.” “The bill does remove all current civil and criminal penalties regarding marijuana. And the bill regulates marijuana like we regulate alcohol — which, it so happens, introduces a myriad of new crimes,” one frustrated Seattle activist said. But there’s also the plausible argument that legalization, even of the sort in HB 2401 with its state monopoly on pot, could be a quantum leap over the deeply fucked up situation on the ground now in Washington: Recreational (as in non-medical) users unlucky enough to be arrested are presently subjected to a mandatory night in jail, possible additional jail or prison time, steep fines, and other indignities. So would it be a deal with the devil to, for now, pretend marijuana is as harmful as alcohol, in order to get the law to treat marijuana as leniently as it does alcohol? That’s the Gordian knot being faced by wary cannabis users in Washington. Read original story at Toke of the Town

Read this article:
Bill To Legalize Marijuana Introduced In Washington Legislature

Czech Republic Decriminalizes Cultivation Of Marijuana Starting Jan. 1

By Steve Elliott in Toke of the Town Photo: Psychonaught Five of these? Yes, please. (Super Silver Haze sativa/indica hybrid) ​ ​ The government of the Czech Republic in eastern Europe will allow ordinary citizens to grow up to five marijuana plants starting Jan. 1, 2010. The cabinet of Prime Minister Jan Fischer defined “personal use” amounts of cannabis and other drugs, clarifying the nation’s new penal code that will decriminalize cultivation and possession of pot. While marijuana will remain technically illegal, possession will be punished only with fines comparable to those imposed for parking tickets, Sean Carney at the Wall Street Journal reports. ​What constituted “small amounts” for personal use was previously undefined. Police and the courts loosely interpreted the laws on a case by case basis, often resulting in home marijuana growers being jailed. Photo: Reality Catcher This is what 15 grams of pot looks like. If you have this much or less, you won’t have to Czech yourself, starting Jan. 1. According to the Justice Ministry’s additional proposed rules, which according to Czech newspaper České Noviny are not yet formally approved, the possession of up to 15 grams (just over half an ounce) of dried marijuana will no longer be a criminal offense. Individuals will be also allowed to possess up to five grams of hashish without being prosecuted. If the government accepts the ministry’s proposed rules in two weeks, those having more than 15 grams of marijuana or five grams of hash could still face up to one year in prison. Also allowed under section of the new rules already approved will be cultivation of up to five coca plants and five mescaline cactus. Up to 40 psilocybin “magic” mushrooms may be kept at home, according to the approved rules. Even harder drugs are included in the decrim plan. According to a section of the proposal not yet officially approved, up to two grams of methamphetamine, cocaine and heroin will also be decriminalized. Possession of up to four Ecstasy tables won’t be criminally punished. Approval of a table specifying specific amounts of drugs is part of the country’s new penal code, approved last year by both houses of Parliament and signed into law this year by President Vaclav Klaus. Photo: Chmee2 Burning one down in the Czech Republic. Hempiest heads in Europe? ​Czechs are not only Europe’s heaviest beer drinkers (320 pints per person per year), according to the Wall Street Journal ; they may also be the continent’s biggest potheads. Almost one of four, 22 percent, of Czechs between 16 and 34 smoke marijuana at least once a year, according to a 2005 report by the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction. Although the medical marijuana issue is gaining prominence in Europe and worldwide, the Czech Republic still doesn’t recognize medical use of the herb. However, a Czech non-profit group in September opened the nation’s first marijuana dispensary in Prague, despite there being no medical marijuana laws on the books. The grand opening of the dispensary was attended by Prague’s mayor, Dr. Pavel Bern, who is also a physician and proponent of responsible marijuana use. Some Czech courts have occasionally made exemptions to current law to allow for medical use and cultivation of cannabis, but without supporting legislation such rules remain in limbo. Digg original story Read Original Story at Toke of the Town

Read more:
Czech Republic Decriminalizes Cultivation Of Marijuana Starting Jan. 1

Sesame Street mocks Fox News with "Pox News," conservative blogger not amused

It's Sesame Street's 40th anniversary and while Google is celebrating with Big Bird's feet, we are more interested in Oscar the Grouch's latest antics. Yes, it seems the surly, trash-can-living muppet is busting out his reporter chops these days and much to the dismay of his audience he's being all lovey-dovey with his interviewees. At the end of the segment one of his viewers calls to tell him she's changing the channel, “From now on I am watching 'Pox' News

Read more here:
Sesame Street mocks Fox News with "Pox News," conservative blogger not amused

Gay Marriage Loses In Maine

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_gay_marriage_maine I was there in the ballroom with the No On One campaign watching the results come back. I was there with friends of mine who had worked our asses off on this campaign, watching as the northern precincts of the state started coming in, and we started losing our lead. Suddenly “No on One” was only 300 votes ahead.

Read more:
Gay Marriage Loses In Maine

New Maria Belen Chapur Photos Revealed!

As South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford prepares to take wife Jenny Sanford on a trip to an undisclosed place to make amends for having an affair, the first current photos of his Argentine mistress, Maria Belen Chapur, have finally surfaced! A woman’s gotta eat

See the original post here:
New Maria Belen Chapur Photos Revealed!