Tag Archives: mayor

Your President Hard At Work: 9/11 Heroes Get The Health Help Two Bush Administrations Didn’t Bother To Create

It took almost ten years after the devastating attacks on New York City and Washington, D.C. for the first responders who risked their lives on September 11, 2001 to get government help with their health expenses. President Obama took time out of his Honolulu vacation to sign the James Zadroga 9/11 Health and Compensation Act into law yesterday. President Barack Obama said Sunday he was honored to sign a bill to provide aid to survivors of the Sept. 11 attacks and first responders who became ill working in the ruins at the World Trade Center. “We will never forget the selfless courage demonstrated by the firefighters, police officers and first responders who risked their lives to save others,” Obama said in a statement. “I believe this is a critical step for those who continue to bear the physical scars of those attacks.” The James Zadroga 9/11 Health and Compensation Act was named after a police officer who died of a respiratory disease he contracted during the 9/11 rescue operations. The bill was one of the last measures Congress passed before adjourning in December. Some Republicans tried to block the measure, saying they were concerned with how to pay for the bill. They dropped their opposition after lawmakers struck a compromise to reduce the costs. The $4.2 billion measure will be paid for with a fee on some foreign companies that get U.S. government procurement contracts. “At long last, the President’s signature has ended our nine-year struggle to address the 9/11 health crisis. The Zadroga law will save lives and fulfills our moral obligation to care for those who rose to the defense of America in a time of war,” said Rep. Carolyn Maloney, D-N.Y. “This is a great victory for the heroes of September 11th, the firefighters, police officers and construction workers. Justice is finally being served,” added Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y. New York City Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg and Police Commissioner Raymond W. Kelly hailed the passage of the bill. “The September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks were an attack on America by a foreign enemy and addressing its health impacts is a national duty,” Bloomberg said. Let’s see the Republicans spin this one at the end of the year when they start their 2012 campaigning. Source

The rest is here:
Your President Hard At Work: 9/11 Heroes Get The Health Help Two Bush Administrations Didn’t Bother To Create

THG Presents: New Year’s Resolutions For 2011!

Happy New Year from The Hollywood Gossip! As the calendar flips over to 2011, we hope that you find your spirit renewed. Or at least slept in. Did you make any New Year’s resolutions this year? How about ones you plan on keeping for more than 48 hours? If so, best of luck with that. We’ve heard what the stars are hoping for this year too. Or at least what they should. Here are some of THG’s celebrity New Year’s resolutions: Girl, put on some clothes and put down the camera. Miley Cyrus : Keep pants on, quotes to a minimum and bongs at home. Kelsey Grammer : Go 12 months without filing for a divorce. Kate Middleton : Remain grounded. Register at Target. Kristen Stewart : Smile in public. Amber Portwood : Settle an argument without violence. Try. At least once. Taylor Momsen : Brood silently, dress like a goth, act all “damaged,” occasionally take off your top in concert. Actually, nix the last part until you turn 18. American Idol fans : Choose a winner that isn’t a white dude in his 20s who plays the guitar. Think we can manage that one of these years? Kanye West : Stir up some conflict for once. Make things interesting! Barack Obama : Gravitate toward the political center. We expect another banner year for Charlie. Charlie Sheen : Make the 29th trip to rehab count. Spencer Pratt : Keep up the fame-whoring schemes. Britney Spears : Appear a little less robotic. Brad Womack : Get engaged this time. Or else. Brett Favre : Keep it in your pants. Giuliana and Bill Rancic : Keep trying to conceive. Or adopt. Crystal Harris : Act like you’re in this thing for love. The Jersey Shore cast : Fist pump and break $h!t. Mel Gibson : Simmer the f*%k down. MR. MAYOR: If THG had its way, it would happen. Levi Johnston : Restore fiscal discipline, strengthen the economy and stand up for the working voters of Wasilla, Alaska; Impregnate Sunny Oglesby . Kim Kardashian : Become talented at something. Seriously. Anything. Mason Dash Disick : File for parental emancipation. Bruce Jenner : Seriously man. Run far, far away. Chris Brown : Spend less time on Twitter. Taylor Lautner : Work out more. Tiger Woods : Reconcile with Rachel Uchitel. Justin Bieber : Continue to be awesome. Lindsay Lohan : For the love of G*d, get her $h!t together!

More here:
THG Presents: New Year’s Resolutions For 2011!

George Lopez — The Mayor Thing Was A JOKE!

Filed under: George Lopez , Politix , Foxnews Latino It took less than 24 hours for George Lopez to pull out of the 2018 election — dude now claims he was only kidding when he announced his plan to run for the mayor of Los Angeles yesterday. After declaring his mayoral intentions on ” Good Day L.A. ” –… Read more

Originally posted here:
George Lopez — The Mayor Thing Was A JOKE!

‘True Grit’ Stars Talk Fave Westerns At Brown-Carpet NYC Premiere

Co-stars Hailee Steinfeld and Barry Pepper reveal their gun-slinging genre favorites to MTV News. By Tom DiChiara Hailee Steinfeld Photo: Jim Spellman/ WireImage If the 25-degree temperatures, dirt-brown carpet (in lieu of a red one) and lack of Golden Globes nominations dampened spirits at Tuesday night’s “True Grit” premiere at New York’s famed Ziegfeld Theatre, it sure didn’t show. Taking a lesson from the film’s title, stars Jeff Bridges, Matt Damon, Barry Pepper and Hailee Steinfeld — as well as a bevy of celebrities, including “Entourage” star Adrian Grenier, musician John Legend and former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani — showed true grit in braving the frigid temps to walk the unconventionally colored carpet. (Giuliani was greeted by chants of “Rudy! Rudy! Rudy!”) And the “True Grit” posse chatted jovially with reporters about the film, which marks a return to the Western genre for “No Country for Old Men” directors Joel and Ethan Coen, and tells of a U.S. Marshal (Bridges) and Texas Ranger (Damon) helping a young girl (Steinfeld) track down her father’s killer (Brolin). When asked what sets “True Grit,” which hits theaters December 22, apart from the rest of the Western pack, Pepper had a theory. “So many of them have so many anachronisms that kind of ruin it for me and pull me out of the period, whereas the Coen brothers are so authentic and they have such a precise vision,” he said. “And the dialogue [in ‘True Grit’] is extraordinary, which is plucked straight from the source of Charles Portis’ novel. So, yeah, this one’s a very special one for me.” As for Pepper’s favorite Western of all time, the actor didn’t have to think twice before responding: “I’d say ‘The Good, the Bad and the Ugly.’ It came out in 1966 and it raised the bar for the Western genre beyond belief.” Singer Legend, en route to what he said was his first trip to a movie theater in months, had a bit more trouble pinpointing his list-topping Western. “Oh, I don’t know — let me think about that,” the “Ordinary People” singer said, eventually revealing that he’s a big fan of “that one with Morgan Freeman,” a.k.a. “Unforgiven.” Meanwhile, Steinfeld, the 14-year-old who’s earning raves for her feature-film debut in “True Grit,” admitted that she hadn’t seen many Westerns before signing on for the movie. “Maybe I can get away with ‘True Grit’?” she laughed. We’ll let it slide. Check out everything we’ve got on “True Grit.” For breaking news, celebrity columns, humor and more — updated around the clock — visit MTVMoviesBlog.com .

The rest is here:
‘True Grit’ Stars Talk Fave Westerns At Brown-Carpet NYC Premiere

Bill Clinton implores Democrats to back tax deal

WASHINGTON – Bill Clinton implored Democrats to back the tax-cut deal that President Barack Obama negotiated with Republicans as the former president made a surprise appearance at Obama's side in the White House briefing room Friday. “I don't believe there is a better deal out there,” Clinton told reporters who'd been summoned at a moment's notice to see the former chief executive back the current one. Clinton and Obama had just finished a private meeting in the Oval Office. Obama said it was a “terrific meeting” and then turned the podium over to Clinton. The voluble former president took it away, and Obama left part-way through his remarks, saying he had holiday parties to attend. “Both sides are going to have to eat some things they don't like,” Clinton told reporters. “We don't want to slip back into a recession. We've got to keep this thing going and accelerate its pace. I think this is the best available option.” The pact would extend cuts in income tax rates for all earners that would otherwise expire next month, renew long-term jobless benefits and trim Social Security taxes for one year. A number of liberal Democrats say it gives away too much to Republicans, and a provision that's particularly irksome to Democrats cuts estate taxes for the wealthiest Americans. Nonetheless the measure appears headed for Senate approval after negotiators added a few relatively modest sweeteners to promote ethanol and other forms of alternative energy. It's unclear whether House Democrats, who are most opposed, will be able to demand changes that go much further. Clinton gave the package his full-throated endorsement, even while noting that he opposes the extension of upper-income tax cuts — though he himself will benefit from it. “I personally believe this is a good deal and the best he could have gotten under the circumstances,” Clinton said, urging fellow Democrats to support it. “If I was in office now, I would have done what the president has done,” he said. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20101210/ap_on_bi_ge/us_obama_clinton added by: JohnA

Republicans block Senate health aid bill for 9.11 workers

Republican senators blocked Democratic legislation on Thursday that sought to provide medical care to rescue workers and others who became ill as a result of breathing in toxic fumes, dust and smoke at the site of the World Trade Center attack in 2001. The 9/11 health bill, a version of which was approved by the House of Representatives in September, was among several initiatives that Senate Democrats had hoped to approve before the close of the 111th Congress. Supporters believe this was their last real opportunity to have the bill passed. The action by the Senate created huge uncertainty over the bill’s future. Its proponents were working on Thursday to salvage the legislation, with one possibility being to have it inserted into a large tax-cut bill that Republicans and Democrats are trying to pass before Congress ends its current session. Such a move seemed unlikely, since it might complicate passage of the tax package, which includes a provision that President Obama sought in return for backing the continuation of tax cuts for all income levels that Republicans wanted: an extension of unemployment benefits. In a vote largely along party lines, the Senate rejected a procedural move by Democrats to end debate on the 9/11 health bill and to bring it to a vote; 60 yes votes were needed, but the move received 57, with 42 votes against. Republicans have been raising concerns about how to pay for the $7.4 billion measure, while Democrats, led by Senator Kirsten E. Gillibrand of New York, have argued that there was a moral obligation to assist those who put their lives at risk during rescue and cleanup operations at ground zero. The bill is formally known as the James Zadroga 9/11 Health and Compensation Act, named after a New York police detective who participated in the rescue efforts at ground zero. He later developed breathing complications that were common to first responders at the site, and he died in January 2006. The cause of his death became a source of debate after the city’s medical examiner concluded that it was not directly related to the attacks. After the vote, Representative Carolyn B. Maloney of New York, a chief sponsor of the bill in the House, argued that Democrats should include the 9/11 health bill in the larger tax-cut legislation and, in the process, dare Republicans to oppose it in that context. Ms. Maloney added that the tax bill was the one piece of legislation that “Republicans won’t leave this town without passing.” As the day wore on, it appeared increasingly unlikely that the Senate would include a provision providing health care for ground zero workers in any tax package it brought to the floor, according to senior Capitol Hill officials. But supporters of the 9/11 legislation said there was a possibility they could persuade Democratic leaders in the House to include it in any tax-cut plan that the chamber approved and win Senate approval during negotiations over differences in measures passed by the two chambers. The Senate action was a blow to sponsors of the bill, who mobilized a network of allies across the political spectrum to lobby on its behalf, including the New York City police commissioner, Raymond W. Kelly, and Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg. Ms. Gillibrand, the chief sponsor in the Senate, even reached out to former President George W. Bush. But her aides say Mr. Bush did not respond to her entreaties. cont. added by: JanforGore

Today Show Refuses to Attach Democratic Label in CA ‘Corruption On Steroids’ Story

NBC’s Tamron Hall blared, “It’s being called ‘corruption on steroids'” while George Lewis added, “It’s been an angry summer in Bell, California, once people learned that city officials awarded themselves huge six figure salaries at taxpayer’s expense.” However neither of them mentioned, in two different stories on Wednesday’s Today show, that those corrupt officials belonged to the Democratic Party. Lewis, strangely, couldn’t even bother to identify the party of Jerry Brown — who has a soundbite in the piece going after the officials — as he just called him “The California attorney general running for governor.” Incidentally, the Today show wasn’t the only news outlet to conveniently drop the “D” label next to those officials accused of bilking California taxpayers. As Newsbusters’ Lachlan Markay  pointed out on Tuesday, “ABC, CBS, the Los Angeles Times, the Associated Press, Bloomberg, USA Today, CNN, MSNBC, NPR, and the San Francisco Chronicle all reported on the arrests today without mentioning party affiliations.” The following Lewis story and Hall anchor brief were the September 22 Today show: [8:02am] TAMRON HALL: In Bell, California it’s being called “corruption on steroids.” Eight current and former city officials spent the night in jail after being arrested for misappropriating more than $5 million in city funds. NBC’s George Lewis has details. George, good morning. [On screen headline: “‘Corruption On Steroids’ California City Officials Busted For Graft”] GEORGE LEWIS: Good morning, Tamron. It’s been an angry summer in Bell, California, once people learned that city officials had awarded themselves huge six figure salaries at taxpayers’ expense. Now those officials face serious felony charges. City Manager Robert Rizzo, busted at his luxury home in Huntington Beach, California, had home had been pulling down $800,000 a year in salary, twice what President Obama makes. His total benefits came to about $1.5 million annually. STEVE COOLEY, LOS ANGELES COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY: The charges accuse Rizzo of being responsible for at least $4.3 million of the city’s losses. LEWIS: Rizzo is one of eight city officials, present and former, charged with numerous accounts of misappropriating public funds. When police went after Mayor Oscar Hernandez, they had to break down the door of his house with a battering ram. COOLEY: This was calculated greed and theft accomplished by deceit and secrecy. LEWIS: The district attorney making it clear he’s going after anyone connected with this. COOLEY: I would charge my mother if I had evidence against my mother. UNIDENTIFIED OFFICIAL: Please I need respect from everybody. Please! LEWIS: In July, when people found out about the astronomical salaries the city officials were getting, they stormed city council meetings demanding their resignation. And when news came of the arrests on Tuesday, some citizens literally jumped for joy. UNIDENTIFIED MAN: We did it! I’m happy. I’m happy! This is what I was waiting for from the very beginning. UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: We just love the idea of all the city council going to jail in handcuffs. LEWIS: The California attorney general running for governor is suing the Bell City officials trying to recover much of the money. JERRY BROWN, CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY GENERAL: When you see it, you can smell it. And this stinks to high heaven. LEWIS: Today when former city manager Rizzo appears in court, the district attorney will ask the judge to set his bail at $3.2 million. The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors is asking the attorney general to appoint a temporary overseer to run day to day business in Bell. Tamron? HALL: Alright George, thanks a lot. … [9:02am] TAMRON HALL: And eight current and former city officials in Bell, California are facing charges of bilking taxpayers out of millions of dollars. A prosecutor called the case “corruption on steroids.”

Read the original:
Today Show Refuses to Attach Democratic Label in CA ‘Corruption On Steroids’ Story

‘Morning Joe’ Actively Pushing Moderate Candidates?

MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” has recently delivered some strange messages of bipartisanship and moderation to its viewers. These included lecturing would-be Koran-burner Florida pastor Terry Jones on loving one’s neighbor before cutting him off without opportunity to answer, and showcasing a “Bipartisan Health Challenge” – a group of politicians and journalists walking three kilometers around the National Mall to promote fitness and bipartisanship. The MSNBC morning show featured a slightly odd segment Monday – which Newsbusters’ Mark Finkelstein first reported on – echoing New York City Mayor Bloomberg’s efforts to support moderate political candidates and combat angry political messages from fringe candidates. The “Morning Joe” crew seemed to fully endorse Mayor Bloomberg’s message,attacking “political extremists who are dominating the airwaves.” Of course, the extremists the brew crew has in mind are conservatives such as former House Speaker Newt Gingrich who compared putting a mosque near Ground Zero with a Nazi sign displayed near a Holocaust memorial. “You know, according to the Times, Bloomberg’s going to be helping candidates who aren’t bound by rigid ideology, and that’s the message we’ve been trying to emphasize here,” co-host Joe Scarborough stated. So what kind of candidates is the show actively endorsing? Are they simply endorsing conservatives and liberals who are trying to work with each other, or are they endorsing more centrist and moderate candidates? Among the candidates Mayor Bloomberg is extending a hand to are Sen. Harry Reid (D), former RINO senator and current independent Rhode Island Gubernatorial candidate Lincoln Chafee, and California gubernatorial candidate Meg Wittman. These aren’t exactly the specter of conservatism or liberalism, aside from Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid. Later, Scarborough continued to make an active push for a certain type of candidate. “Now we’re going to continue like we’ve done for three years – to encourage viewers and guests to resist the pull of those people on the far Right and the “Professional Left” who seek division.” To be fair, Scarborough has expressed his approval in the past for conservative stars Gov. Haley Barbour of Mississippi and Gov. Chris Christie of New Jersey, and he is a self-described old-style conservative. He may not have been advocating centrist candidates as much as conservatives and liberals who promise to reach across the aisle. Even so, Scarborough and company’s message seems fuzzy as to who and what exactly they’re endorsing – and why they were taking time to endorse them in the first place. A transcript of the segment, which aired on September 20 at 6:37 a.m. EDT, is as follows: MIKA BRZEZINSKI: Welcome back to “Morning Joe.” New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg making news over the weekend with his extensive interview with the New York Times. The front page interview raises new speculation about his possible Presidential ambitions. JOE SCARBOROUGH: You think he’s going to run? BRZEZINSKI: I’m thinking. In the interview, Bloomberg confirms he is trying to pull politics back to the middle by helping candidates across the country – Republicans, Democrats, and Independents – fend off the Tea Party. The candidates include Meg Wittman, the Republican running for Governor of California, and Lincoln Chafee, a Republican-turned-Independent, running for Governor of Rhode Island. He also plans to host a fundraiser in Manhattan for Democrat Harry Reid, the Senate Majority Leader facing Tea Party candidate Sharron Angle, who’s being backed by Sarah Palin. Now in the interview, the mayor says this, Joe. “Look, people are angry. … Their anger is understandable. Washington isn’t working. … Anger, however, is not a government strategy .. .It’s not a way to govern.” And that, of course Joe, has been the theme of this show for three years. SCARBOROUGH: I love that line, “Anger is not a government strategy.” And the mayor’s right. He really is. You know, according to the Times, Bloomberg’s going to be helping candidates who aren’t bound by rigid ideology, and that’s the message we’ve been trying to emphasize here, and also in my book – I mean, we’ve been doing it every day on “Morning Joe.” And what we try to do is encourage politicians and thought-leaders, and every American to follow the advice of an old British war poster that carried a very simple message: “Keep calm and carry on.” And, you know, that was a message, Mika, that FDR delivered to a battered nation in the depths of the Great Depression, when, you know, he declared to all Americans that all we have to fear is fear itself. It’s also the message that Bobby Kennedy delivered to a shocked nation on the night that Martin Luther King was assassinated. And I really do believe that’s the message Americans need to hear again today. Because today our nation is confronting a new war. And it’s a war of words. We’ve forgotten how to talk to each other. You’ve got political extremists who are dominating the airwaves and dominating the national debate. And you know, what the White House calls the “Professional Left,” as well as what we call the “Far Right,” now profit from division and hate speech but makes our political system weaker. And yet, isn’t it strange that Washington politicians seem to obsess on those angry voices on the “Professional Left” and the “Far Right,” instead of seeking out voices of people like you, rational Americans who show respect to their neighbors, who raise their families, who go to work, and who play by the rules. It’s time for you, you quiet Americans, to respond, and not with angry words or hateful commentaries, or setting your hair on fire, calling a Republican President a “fascist” or a Democratic President a “fascist.” But rather, to respond with reasonable voices in a rational debate. Now we’re going to continue like we’ve done for three years – to encourage viewers and guests to resist the pull of those people on the far Right and the “Professional Left” who seek division – we’re going to say resist that, and instead let’s keep focusing on the task at hand, ensuring that America’s greatest days lie ahead. BRZEZINSKI: And what we do here, and what we’ll continue to do is we’ll call out those who preach hate, and we’ll continue to celebrate civility and promote open debate for all voices. Voices on all sides are welcome. And as Joe and I try to show you every day – I think we do a pretty good job, except when you interrupt me – SCARBOROUGH: Except when you hit me – BRZEZINSKI: Well, there’s that – that you can disagree without being disagreeable. SCARBOROUGH: Yeah, and Mika, the mayor is right. Now more than ever Americans need to work together, they need to keep calm, and they need to carry on. I like the mayor’s message. Anger is not a governing message, and it’s not a governing message when Republicans are in power, it’s not a governing message when Democrats are in power. We need to keep it together. (…) 7:03 a.m. EDT JOE SCARBOROUGH: (On Newt Gingrich) I’ve said it before, Mika, I’ll say it again. He’s selling books. And unfortunately, as we said last hour – whether it’s the “Professional Left,” or in this case the “Professional Right,” people make extreme statements that may drive up ratings, may sell books, but they hurt America. They hurt America, they coarsen the debate, and hopefully we can move beyond that. (…) 7:45 a.m. EDT SCARBOROUGH: We’ve been talking for some time on this show – if you’ve seen it, you know – we constantly are calling out extreme voices on the Right, and extreme voices on the Left, and one of the reasons is because it makes people’s jobs so much harder in the Senate.

See the original post here:
‘Morning Joe’ Actively Pushing Moderate Candidates?

Golden Retriever Puppies eat boy ALIVE

Will nothing stop these cute and dangerous puppies from eating people or causing death from cuteness overload. added by: Mcellie

Republican Senator Richard Burr….The Big Government Corporatist!

Although this article excludes a ballot candidate, Libertarian Dr Mike Beitler. Who recently polled 10% and is making HUGE splashes in North Carolina: http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/PPP_Release_NC_706.pdf I still think it does a great job pointing out the corporatism that is inherent in our political system. What is worse, is most people don't realize how voting for their red and blue teams actually perpetuates and is a continuation of this corporate socialism process. BY ROB CHRISTENSEN AND DAVID RAYNOR – Staff writers Former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani was the star attraction at Shelly's Backroom, a scotch and cigar bar in downtown Washington, but the beneficiary was Republican Sen. Richard Burr. The reception last year attracted representatives from a cross section of corporate America: Fidelity Investments, TIAA-CREF, Ameriprise Financial, Hospital Corp. of America, Bayer, Murphy Oil and the American Chemistry Council. Each plunked down up to $2,500 for Burr's re-election kitty, campaign finance records show. Such events, repeated dozens of times since he took office in the Senate in 2005, demonstrate his clout both in business and in Washington, helping him amass a $9.1 million campaign war chest. Quantcast Burr heads into the fall campaign with a commanding financial advantage over his Democratic challenger, Secretary of State Elaine Marshall, having raised nine times as much as she. Even more striking, Burr had $6.2 million on hand compared to $163,195 for Marshall as of June 30, the last time the candidates were required to disclose campaign finances. Burr's campaign has been bankrolled largely by the business community. His donor list reads like a Dow Jones ticker. No member of Congress during this election cycle has received more money than Burr from individuals and political action committees affiliated with pharmaceutical companies, tobacco companies, business associations, foreign import automobile dealers, dentists and steel producers, according to the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics, which tracks congressional fundraising. Burr has received the second-highest amount of political donations of any member of Congress from the insurance industry, according to the center, and he's among the leading recipients of money from commercial banks, agribusiness and electric utilities. 'A level of trust' Burr said it was only natural for North Carolina's major industries to support him because he understands their issues. “There is a level of trust,” he said in a recent interview. Burr, who was a Winston-Salem sales executive for a wholesaler before entering politics, pointed out that his donations reflect North Carolina's workplace. “We are a state that is one of the largest manufacturers of pharmaceutical products and also a state of steel manufacturers,” he said, adding that political action committee donations “are a reflection of employee contributions on behalf of their company and their industry.” But Marshall has sought to portray Burr as a Washington insider and a tool of special interests during his 10 years in the House and nearly six years in the Senate. “He … has been there for 16 years,” Marshall said in an interview. “He has taken their contributions. He is beholden to them. He bailed out the Wall Street banks. He turned his back on hardworking North Carolinians.” Some of the most influential K Street lobbying firms hosted D.C. fundraisers for Burr's re-election campaign, according to invitations obtained by the Sunlight Foundation, a Washington nonprofit group that seeks to increase transparency in government. McBee Strategic Group and the BGR Group, both high-powered lobbying firms, even held fundraisers at their downtown Washington offices. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld held a reception at a D.C. steakhouse, and the Podesta Group hosted a breakfast at the Capitol Hill Club. Burr has been a key ally of business since his election to the U.S. House in 1994. That continued with his election to the Senate 10 years later. In his 2004 Senate race, he held at least 80 Washington fundraisers. This weekend, Burr was scheduled to hold a golf fundraiser at Pine Needles Lodge and Golf Course at Southern Pines at a cost of $1,500 for individuals and $2,500 for a PAC. Marshall, who has been secretary of state since 1996, has long had a reputation as an indifferent fundraiser, and her Senate campaign has done nothing to change that view. North Carolina trial lawyers, who contributed $73,000, are the only major identifiable group of Marshall donors, Federal Election Commission records say. But outside groups have helped her indirectly. Labor, environmental and liberal groups such as MoveOn.org, though not contributing to Marshall's campaign, have financed hundreds of thousands of dollars of anti-Burr TV commercials this summer. His total not unusual Although Burr's $9.1 million haul dwarfs Marshall's donations, the total is not extraordinary. Fifteen Senate candidates raised more than Burr in this election, led by Sen. John McCain with $26.7 million. In the 2008 Senate campaign in North Carolina, Republican Sen. Elizabeth Dole raised $17.4 million, compared with $8.9 million for her Democratic challenger, Kay Hagan. Burr's fundraising patterns are typical of most senators', said Dave Levinthal, a spokesman for the Center for Responsive Politics. “He is acting like a senator,” Levinthal said. “The system is set up so that the big money is in a few power centers. If you want to tap the big money, you go to D.C. or New York.” What's notable about Burr's fundraising, Levinthal said, is that 72 percent of his contributions came from North Carolina – a healthy slice of home-state gifts for a senator. He also noted that Burr's largest contributors tended to be major North Carolina employers such as Reynolds American, the Winston-Salem cigarette manufacturer, plus the Raleigh law firm Womble Carlyle and Charlotte-based Duke Energy. Burr has gone beyond the $9.1 million for his re-election campaign. He also pulled in $1.1 million for the Richard Burr Victory 2010 Committee to help the Republican Party get out the vote this fall. And he raised $379,496 for his Next Century Fund, which went to other congressional candidates. In April last year, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce raised about $43,000 for Burr from companies such as Wal-Mart Stores, Time-Warner, Duke Energy and Progress Energy. The chamber gave him a 100 percent rating in 2008 and an 87 percent rating in 2009. He votes for business “Sen. Burr has been a reliable vote for the business community on issues that create jobs,” said J.P. Fielder, a chamber spokesman. Burr voted with the chamber in opposing the Democrats' health care plan and opposing the Lily Ledbetter Pay Act to extend the period when discrimination claims can be made. He also voted against giving bankruptcy judges more authority to modify existing home mortgages, voting with the industry. Burr Health Professionals $428,229 Lawyers/law firms $411,799 Pharmaceuticals/ health products $398,733 Insurance $308,160 Lobbyists $297,843 Leadership PACs $279,818 Electric Utilities $269,425 Securities and investments $240,050 Real estate $229,700 Commercial Banks $212,682 Marshall Lawyers/law firms $166,555 Democratic/liberal groups $52,260 Women's issue groups $25,550 Educators $17,207 Tobacco $15,650 Health professionals $15,460 Real estate $15,050 Securities and investments $10,100 Industrial unions $10,000 Leadership PACs $10,000 Dr Mike Beitler ZERO DOLLARS IN SPECIAL INTEREST LOBBYIST FUNDS/Political Action Committees! Source: Center for Responsive Politics http://www.newsobserver.com/2010/09/19/690312/business-bolsters-burr-and-vice.ht… added by: shanklinmike