Tag Archives: media

Robert Pattinson On GMA: ‘Pretty Much Everything That Comes Out Of My Mouth Is Irrelevant’

Whether or not Robert Pattinson carries Cosmopolis to box-office glory this coming weekend, I hope he’s around the movie business for a long time. Unlike Kristen Stewart, who, I’m convinced, is Oscar material,  Pattinson has yet to blow me away as an actor, but I do think he should win an award for the cheeky way in which he keeps showing us that contemporary celebrity journalism is a joke. Pattinson’s hysterical media tour for  Cosmopolis   has been underway since Monday when Jon Stewart — Mr. I-Schooled-Jim-Cramer-and-President-Obama-on-national-TV — served the actor melted ice cream and a bunch of runnier questions on The Daily Show . And then on Wednesday, things got even sillier. Pattinson appeared on Good Morning America, where   host George Stephanopoulos informed the actor that the  show’s staff had done some research and come up with Pattinson’s favorite breakfast food: Cinnamon Toast Crunch. (Good to see the ABC News  budget going to good use.) The interview that followed was a lot like that cereal: sickly sweet and full of empty calories, although the winning and witty Pattinson never went soggy in the milk bath of Stephanopoulos’ aimless questioning. I couldn’t help but admire the actor’s response when Stephanopoulos, attempting to get the “elephant in the room out of the way”  asked Pattinson “How are you doing? And what do you want your fans to know about what’s going on in your personal life?” Behind the two men, a small horde of those fans stared hungrily at their Twilight idol through the glass walls of GMA ‘s Times Square studio. If Pattinson, who we keep being told has no publicist, was going to play the game, that was the moment where he was supposed to drop some morsel about his supposed relationship drama with Kristen Stewart. Instead, he used GMA’ s cereal shtick to his advantage. “I’d like my fans to know that Cinnamon Toast Crunch has 30 calories per bowl,” Pattinson said with a vampy grin, reducing the idiocy of contemporary celebrity journalism to a single line. Make that two: “Pretty much everything that comes out of my mouth is irrelevant,” he added. Nice. “I take it that you don’t want to talk too much about it,” replied Stephanopoulos, which made me spit my breakfast back into my bowl. Really?  “Is that the way you handle all of this craziness?”  the former Clinton Administration adviser continued. “You get into to it to do movies,” said Pattinson. “I’ve never been interested in trying to sell my personal life. And that’s really the only reason people try to bring it up.  The reason why you go on TV is to promote movies.” The thing is, even though GMA showed a clip and Pattinson talked about the role, I don’t think the TV audience  left with a better idea of whether they would want to see Cosmopolis , or why Pattinson wanted to appear in it. If director David Cronenberg — whose films provoke and inspire even when they don’t work as conventional entertainment — was discussed at all during the interview, I don’t recall a single significant thing that was said. Instead the interview became more about Pattinson’s celebrity. Fortunately, he is capable of being introspective.  “If you start getting used to it, it means you’re going crazy,” the actor told Stephanopoulos, adding:  “It’s like being on the craziest theme-park ride.  It’s exciting, but, eventually, at some point, you’ve got to have a break.” Pattinson, who plays an increasingly unhinged billionaire in Cosmopolis , even suggested a way that henpecked celebrities like him could get a break from the paparazzi:  “If you put the lives of people who control billions on the front page of every single paper, the world would be a better place,”  he said. (Except Rob, that many of those billionaires also control much of the media.) To those same ends, the actor without a publicist had a few choice words to say about “spin culture” that, I suspect, raised some hackles at the high-powered publicity firms that represent celebrity’s finest.  “If you took away publicists” and those who relied on them “spoke for themselves, then they’d have to be responsible for their words.” the actor said. I think that’s what I like best about Pattinson.  He knows he’s part of the problem, but he sounds like he’d prefer to be part of the solution. Follow Frank DiGiacomo on Twitter. Follow Movieline on Twitter.

The rest is here:
Robert Pattinson On GMA: ‘Pretty Much Everything That Comes Out Of My Mouth Is Irrelevant’

Robert Pattinson On GMA: ‘Pretty Much Everything That Comes Out Of My Mouth Is Irrelevant’

Whether or not Robert Pattinson carries Cosmopolis to box-office glory this coming weekend, I hope he’s around the movie business for a long time. Unlike Kristen Stewart, who, I’m convinced, is Oscar material,  Pattinson has yet to blow me away as an actor, but I do think he should win an award for the cheeky way in which he keeps showing us that contemporary celebrity journalism is a joke. Pattinson’s hysterical media tour for  Cosmopolis   has been underway since Monday when Jon Stewart — Mr. I-Schooled-Jim-Cramer-and-President-Obama-on-national-TV — served the actor melted ice cream and a bunch of runnier questions on The Daily Show . And then on Wednesday, things got even sillier. Pattinson appeared on Good Morning America, where   host George Stephanopoulos informed the actor that the  show’s staff had done some research and come up with Pattinson’s favorite breakfast food: Cinnamon Toast Crunch. (Good to see the ABC News  budget going to good use.) The interview that followed was a lot like that cereal: sickly sweet and full of empty calories, although the winning and witty Pattinson never went soggy in the milk bath of Stephanopoulos’ aimless questioning. I couldn’t help but admire the actor’s response when Stephanopoulos, attempting to get the “elephant in the room out of the way”  asked Pattinson “How are you doing? And what do you want your fans to know about what’s going on in your personal life?” Behind the two men, a small horde of those fans stared hungrily at their Twilight idol through the glass walls of GMA ‘s Times Square studio. If Pattinson, who we keep being told has no publicist, was going to play the game, that was the moment where he was supposed to drop some morsel about his supposed relationship drama with Kristen Stewart. Instead, he used GMA’ s cereal shtick to his advantage. “I’d like my fans to know that Cinnamon Toast Crunch has 30 calories per bowl,” Pattinson said with a vampy grin, reducing the idiocy of contemporary celebrity journalism to a single line. Make that two: “Pretty much everything that comes out of my mouth is irrelevant,” he added. Nice. “I take it that you don’t want to talk too much about it,” replied Stephanopoulos, which made me spit my breakfast back into my bowl. Really?  “Is that the way you handle all of this craziness?”  the former Clinton Administration adviser continued. “You get into to it to do movies,” said Pattinson. “I’ve never been interested in trying to sell my personal life. And that’s really the only reason people try to bring it up.  The reason why you go on TV is to promote movies.” The thing is, even though GMA showed a clip and Pattinson talked about the role, I don’t think the TV audience  left with a better idea of whether they would want to see Cosmopolis , or why Pattinson wanted to appear in it. If director David Cronenberg — whose films provoke and inspire even when they don’t work as conventional entertainment — was discussed at all during the interview, I don’t recall a single significant thing that was said. Instead the interview became more about Pattinson’s celebrity. Fortunately, he is capable of being introspective.  “If you start getting used to it, it means you’re going crazy,” the actor told Stephanopoulos, adding:  “It’s like being on the craziest theme-park ride.  It’s exciting, but, eventually, at some point, you’ve got to have a break.” Pattinson, who plays an increasingly unhinged billionaire in Cosmopolis , even suggested a way that henpecked celebrities like him could get a break from the paparazzi:  “If you put the lives of people who control billions on the front page of every single paper, the world would be a better place,”  he said. (Except Rob, that many of those billionaires also control much of the media.) To those same ends, the actor without a publicist had a few choice words to say about “spin culture” that, I suspect, raised some hackles at the high-powered publicity firms that represent celebrity’s finest.  “If you took away publicists” and those who relied on them “spoke for themselves, then they’d have to be responsible for their words.” the actor said. I think that’s what I like best about Pattinson.  He knows he’s part of the problem, but he sounds like he’d prefer to be part of the solution. Follow Frank DiGiacomo on Twitter. Follow Movieline on Twitter.

The rest is here:
Robert Pattinson On GMA: ‘Pretty Much Everything That Comes Out Of My Mouth Is Irrelevant’

Jodie Foster Sticks Up for Kristen Stewart, Blasts Media Culture

On the heels of her quasi firing from the Snow White and the Huntsman sequel , Kristen Stewart could use all the support she can get. And she now has some from one of the most respected actresses in Hollywood. Oscar winner Jodie Foster has penned an editorial for The Daily Beast in which stands up for her Panic Room costar – the pair appeared in that 2001 thrilled when Stewart was 11 – and slams the celebrity-obsessed media culture, which likes to “life up beautiful young people like gods and then pull them down to earth to gaze at their seams.” Foster, who has acted since the age of three, writes: “If I were a young actor today I would quit before I started. If I had to grow up in this media culture, I don’t think I could survive it emotionally… Would I drown myself in drugs, sex, and parties? Would I be lost?” Foster never cites Kristen’s affair with Rupert Sanders . She refrains from commenting on this specific scandal. Instead, she takes a larger view at what the 24/7 news channels, supermarket tabloids and blogosphere have created, saying the constant attention makes it difficult for an actor to give a “truthful” performance because he or she is always on guard. It’s impossible to be “fearful” in the face of such a barrage. “How can you do that if you know you will be personally judged, skewered, betrayed? If you’re smart, you learn to willfully disassociate, to compartmentalize. Putting your emotions into a safety box definitely comes in handy when the public throws stones.” Sounds a lot like the public persona Stewart gives off, doesn’t it? She’s never looked comfortable in the spotlight. How come? “She’s learned,” writes Foster. “She keeps her head down, her shades on, fists in her pockets. Don’t speak. Don’t look. Don’t cry.” Foster concludes with advice for her young, troubled friend: The public horrors of today eventually blow away. And yes, you are changed by the awful wake of reckoning they leave behind. You trust less. You calculate your steps. You survive. Hopefully in the process you don’t lose your ability to throw your arms in the air again and spin in wild abandon. That is the ultimate F.U. and–finally–the most beautiful survival tool of all. Don’t let them take that away from you.

Read more:
Jodie Foster Sticks Up for Kristen Stewart, Blasts Media Culture

Jodie Foster Sticks Up for Kristen Stewart, Blasts Media Culture

On the heels of her quasi firing from the Snow White and the Huntsman sequel , Kristen Stewart could use all the support she can get. And she now has some from one of the most respected actresses in Hollywood. Oscar winner Jodie Foster has penned an editorial for The Daily Beast in which stands up for her Panic Room costar – the pair appeared in that 2001 thrilled when Stewart was 11 – and slams the celebrity-obsessed media culture, which likes to “life up beautiful young people like gods and then pull them down to earth to gaze at their seams.” Foster, who has acted since the age of three, writes: “If I were a young actor today I would quit before I started. If I had to grow up in this media culture, I don’t think I could survive it emotionally… Would I drown myself in drugs, sex, and parties? Would I be lost?” Foster never cites Kristen’s affair with Rupert Sanders . She refrains from commenting on this specific scandal. Instead, she takes a larger view at what the 24/7 news channels, supermarket tabloids and blogosphere have created, saying the constant attention makes it difficult for an actor to give a “truthful” performance because he or she is always on guard. It’s impossible to be “fearful” in the face of such a barrage. “How can you do that if you know you will be personally judged, skewered, betrayed? If you’re smart, you learn to willfully disassociate, to compartmentalize. Putting your emotions into a safety box definitely comes in handy when the public throws stones.” Sounds a lot like the public persona Stewart gives off, doesn’t it? She’s never looked comfortable in the spotlight. How come? “She’s learned,” writes Foster. “She keeps her head down, her shades on, fists in her pockets. Don’t speak. Don’t look. Don’t cry.” Foster concludes with advice for her young, troubled friend: The public horrors of today eventually blow away. And yes, you are changed by the awful wake of reckoning they leave behind. You trust less. You calculate your steps. You survive. Hopefully in the process you don’t lose your ability to throw your arms in the air again and spin in wild abandon. That is the ultimate F.U. and–finally–the most beautiful survival tool of all. Don’t let them take that away from you.

Read more:
Jodie Foster Sticks Up for Kristen Stewart, Blasts Media Culture

WATCH: Robert Pattinson On ‘Fear’ and David Cronenberg On ‘Irrelevant’ KStew Scandal At NY Cosmopolis Premiere

Twi-hards — and the media —  have certainly been paying more attention to David Cronenberg since the filmmaker cast Robert Pattinson in his latest,  Cosmopolis , but they shouldn’t expect him to reciprocate. Movieline pal Grace Randolph caught The Fly director and his star on the red carpet at the New York premiere of Cosmopolis , where Cronenberg shrugged off the impact of Pattinson’s reported break-up with his Twilight star Kristen Stewart .  “Honestly, that doesn’t touch me, and it doesn’t touch the movie,” said Cronenberg. “It’s really irrelevant. Not to [Rob] obviously, but to me and the movie. It doesn’t change the movie at all,” Cronenberg added. “That’s all media stuff.” The media was in full frenzy at the Peggy Siegal Company and Gucci-hosted premiere, which took place at the Museum of Modern Art in Midtown Manhattan, and Pattinson was their number-one target.  Despite the crush, RPatz seemed to be enjoying the attention, and at one point was caught on Randolph’s camera saying: “The only thing I can be scared of is being bad.”   Let’s see what the reviews say. Check out Grace’s interviews below. Watch It on YouTube. Follow Frank DiGiacomo on Twitter. Follow Movieline on Twitter.  

See the article here:
WATCH: Robert Pattinson On ‘Fear’ and David Cronenberg On ‘Irrelevant’ KStew Scandal At NY Cosmopolis Premiere

A Lil Positivity: Gabby Douglas To Appear On Oprah’s Next Chapter

Olympic Gold Medalist Gabby Douglas To Appear On Oprah’s Next Chapter Teenage Olympic Gold Medalist Gabby Douglas will be t he next to chop it up with the queen of talk show, Oprah Winfrey. Following an amazing London Olympics in which American gymnast Gabby Douglas earned herself 2 gold medals, in the individual all-around and team competitions, she will sit down with Oprah Winfrey. The interview will take place in Des Moines, Iowa, where Douglas lived with a host family while training for her Olympic dream. The 16-year-old will discuss moving away from home in order to train, her mother’s support, and all the media attention she received while in London. The new episode will air on Oprah’s Next Chapter on Sunday, August 26 at 8:30pm. Gabby is gettin that gwap! We aint mad at her. Source

Read the original post:
A Lil Positivity: Gabby Douglas To Appear On Oprah’s Next Chapter

Lupe Fiasco Explains Why He Called Obama A Terrorist And “A Great Speaker, But Kills Little Children”

Lupe Fiasco sat down to talk about his controversial viewpoints and his upcoming album, Food & Liquor II: The Great American Rap Album Pt. 1, this week. Known to be apolitical and someone who doesn’t vote, Lupe considers himself “a stone-cold subversive”: This time, “the plot,” as Lupe calls it, is to release the album’s first installment in September and the sequel in early 2013, with several singles hitting airwaves along the way. “It’s meant to tell the great American experience, touch on my ideas, my very rough, very unfinished, unpolished thoughts and feelings about America: American history, American culture, American society, American beauty, American food. You’ll see that laced throughout the album,” he said. If the first two joints, “B!tch Bad” and “Around My Way (Freedom Ain’t Free),” are any barometer, the rapper’s reputation for blistering social and political commentary will remain intact. No hoes, kush and rims here, thank you. If you know his music, you probably recognize him as a gifted lyricist with a wide range of beats and a penchant for material that can go a little over listeners’ heads. It’s not that he’s condescending; he wants their heads a little higher. Those who know him only through headlines and sound bites may be more familiar with his Occupy Wall Street participation or his occasional inflammatory remark — such as when he called the president “the biggest terrorist” last year. Asked to elaborate, Lupe said there was a lot of backlash to his comment — especially from a hip-hop community that generally stands behind the country’s first black president — but his barb was more directed at the Oval Office rather than any particular man who has occupied it. “I think that American presidentssss,” he said, hissing to emphasize the plural, “that position in itself, as well as American foreign policy, it has terrorism in it. CIA agents going to overthrow certain governments — they’re using terrorist tactics. They’re not going in there like, ‘Hey, you wanna have some cake?’ “ “I don’t think it’s being unpatriotic,” he said of his stance. “This nation was founded by rebels and revolutionaries, and its flags were carried across the battlefields by people who were very, very against the status quo and who questioned and criticized. I think it’s following that tradition, but I think we’re in very sensitive times.” Not only did he decline to waver on his incendiary assessment of the commander in chief, but the day after explaining the aforementioned remarks, he described Obama as “someone who is a great speaker, but kills little children,” during an interview with a Philadelphia radio station. We got to respect his stance on Politics and the fact that Lupe has stayed true to his roots since the original Food and Liquor dropped back in ’06. He touches on the striking level of violence going on in the country right now, especially amongst youth: What often seems like savagery among urban youth can often be attributed to a lack of conflict-management skills, he said, and it’s troubling how much of the violence in American cities can be traced back to base aggression and materialism. Rap isn’t solely to blame, he said, but it often reinforces many of the inner city’s most cancerous characteristics. “What’s the biggest commercial for aggression, sexuality and materialism? What gets pumped into these kids’ heads?” he asked in a veiled shot at his musical genre. “Taking someone else’s girl, which is so laissez-faire in hip-hop, will get you killed in the streets, but it doesn’t seem to be an issue when you hear it on the radio.” It’s an interesting notion, that hip-hop should have a conscience, and it’s not something you hear from within the industry, at least outside the likes of Common or Talib Kweli. Perhaps it’s just another example of how Lupe isn’t your typical rap star. This is Lupe’s fourth album and it’s set to drop September 25th. Source Images via WENN/Facebook

Read more here:
Lupe Fiasco Explains Why He Called Obama A Terrorist And “A Great Speaker, But Kills Little Children”

Planned Parenthood: Kimmy Cakes No Longer On Birth Control, Are KimYe Having A Baby?

Kim Kardashian Quits Birth Control The rumors that KimYe are eager to start a family have been poppin’ for months now, almost since they first started dating. Now it’s looking like Kim has started to take the necessary steps. In the past year Kim Kardashian has gotten engaged and married, filed for divorce, and began house hunting with new beau Kanye West. But it seems things aren’t moving fast enough for the reality star. In Touch can exclusively reveal that Kim has taken a big step in her quest to conceive — she’s quit her birth control! “Kim is ready to have babies and talks about it all the time,” reveals a Kardashian insider to In Touch. And since she’s been on the pill for around 15 years, reports another source, Kim, 31, is taking “the necessary measures” to make it easier to conceive. And Kanye, 35, is not being shy about how he feels about Kim getting pregnant either! Hitting Manhattan hotspot PHD with Leonardo DiCaprio on August 3, Kanye “didn’t even look at girls,” says an eyewitness to In Touch. Instead, he jumped in the DJ booth and debuted three new songs … including one titled “Perfect B!tch” that mentions his “future wife,” Kim, and proclaims he wants her to have his babies. This seems so rushed, considering she’s still not divorced from her doofus ex. What do you think? Is life too short to be worried about “little details” like that? Are you excited about the idea of KimYe having a baby or is it a bad idea? On a side note — birth control is a pretty sensitive topic, and while we saw Kim discuss it on TV when she and Kris were doing her show we gotta wonder who is running their mouth to the media about this one. Kimmy Cakes it might be time to get you a new gynecologist! Source SplashNews

Link:
Planned Parenthood: Kimmy Cakes No Longer On Birth Control, Are KimYe Having A Baby?

What If Marilyn Monroe Hadn’t Died in 1962? A Reality-Flouting Wish List of Films She Should Have Done

As I skim the warmed-over tributes to Marilyn Monroe on the dubious occasion of her being dead for 50 years, a variation of one headline keeps coming up: “50 Years Dead and More Alive Than Ever.” Rather than post some smart-ass comment about lazy headline writers, I thought I’d work with that idea: If Marilyn was still alive, what would have been some great movie vehicles for her? Below, in no particular order, my Movieline Nine wish list, which mostly ignores what Monroe’s actual would have been when these movies would have been made.  This is hypothetical after all, and, besides, if you, type “Marilyn Monroe” and “ageless” into Google, you get more than 3.8 million hits. Okay, Marilyn fans, you’ve been served.  Now, in the words of J.J. Hunsecker: “Match me.”  Put your wish lists in the comments section below. 1. Who Framed Roger Rabbit? (1988):  Because Monroe playing the voice of Jessica Rabbit and delivering the line, “I’m not bad, I’m just drawn that way,” in her presumably wizened sex-kitten voice voice would have been a beautiful thing. 2. Th e Poseidon Adventure (1972):  Actually, no time-space continuum meddling would have been necessary for Monroe to have starred in this movie.  Shelley Winters was 52 when she played the part of Belle Rosen and made that unforgettable — and ultimately sacrificial — swim to save Gene Hackman and secure that underwater lifeline. Monroe would have been 46, and I’d like to think she would have been as bawdy and mouthy as Winters at that age. The swimming scene could also have been a great nod to her hot-stuff swimming-pool scenes in Something’s Got to Give , which, in keeping with the premise here, would have actually been finished. 3. Grey Gardens (2009): Given all of the media generated by alleged Monroe’s relationships with John F. Kennedy and his brother Bobby, think of the press frenzy that would have resulted had she portrayed Jacqueline Onassis’ loopy aunt, Edith “Big Edie” Bouvier Beale in Michael Sucsy’s dramatic adaptation of the Maysles Brothers 1975 documentary. 4.  Young Adult  (2011):   This would require putting Diablo Cody and Jason Reitman in the Hot Tub Time Machine and sending them back to 1962, but, lo, the results! Monroe takes Charlize Theron’s homewrecking role, and a young Don Rickles takes over for Patton Oswalt. That’s a movie I want to see. Plus, the subject matter makes the movie much more talked-about in 1960s, thereby getting it more of the Oscar love it surely deserved. 5. Thelma & Louise (1991):  Once again, some time-bending would be required since Monroe would have been in her mid-60s when this movie was made. The more important question, though is, would Marilyn have made a better Thelma or Louise?  I say Louise, because I bet that by the time she hit middle age, Monroe would have thrilled to play a scene where she shoots a man. 6. Flirting with Disaster (1996): Monroe would have been pushing 70–about 10 years older than Mary Tyler Moore was when the sitcom star turned heads as the acidic, body-conscious Mrs. Coplin. But if Monroe had cared for her her curves, David O. Russell would have pulled a hallmark performance from her. I suspect Monroe would not have been nearly as tart as Moore, but she would have been memorable. 7. Ocean’s 11 (2001): You’re thinking Angie Dickinson’s role, I’m not.  I love Elliott Gould, particularly in this movie, but I think Steven Soderbergh directing Monroe as the female Reuben Tishkoff would have been so cool. Clooney and Pitt could have played off her as if they’d had a sexual past in younger days, and Monroe could have had a Mae West Sextette moment. 8. New York, New York (1977): I was planning to include a Hitchcock film on here until I read some of Tippi Hedren’s interviews about her sexual harassment at the hands of the brilliant-but-brutish director.  Then it hit me: Marty!  Yes, I know the movie has its flaws, but it’s ambitious, and Scorsese would have pushed Monroe to new heights in both the dramatic scenes and the musical numbers. Then again, Marilyn was no Liza Minnelli. So, if you’re really struggling with it, throw reality to the wind and imagine Monroe in Sharon Stone’s role in Casino. 9. Step Sisters (In my dreams) So, in some alternate reality, some super agent convinces Adam McKay to direct a remake of his 2008 comedy  Step Brothers  starring Madonna and Lady Gaga in, respectively, in the Will Ferrell and John C. Reilly roles. Monroe would play Mary Steenburgen’s part. Kristen Wiig and Annie Mumolo would write. Yes, I know, it would be easier to raise Monroe from the dead than get Madonna to co-star in anything with Gaga, but just think of the box office. Follow Frank DiGiacomo on Twitter . Follow Movieline on Twitter. 

Read the original:
What If Marilyn Monroe Hadn’t Died in 1962? A Reality-Flouting Wish List of Films She Should Have Done

New Couple? Cee-Lo Spotted Dining With Mystery Dime

Cee-Lo Green was spotted on a lunch date with a pretty woman who was not Trina Braxton… She doesn’t seem too thrilled though. Do you think there’s any romance in the air between these two? GSI Media

Read the rest here:
New Couple? Cee-Lo Spotted Dining With Mystery Dime