Tag Archives: media

Joel Madden Scoops Nicole Richie By Announcing Engagement On Twitter

Richie also made announcement while taping ‘Letterman’ for Friday. By Jayson Rodriguez Joel Madden and Nicole Richie Photo: David Livingston/ Getty Images Oops! Nicole Richie had apparently planned to announce her engagement to Joel Madden on Friday night’s “Late Show With David Letterman,” but her fianc

University of Alabama Shooting Suspect Dr. Amy Bishop: A Politicized Composite Emerges

Yesterday afternoon at the University of Alabama, Huntsville, a suspect was detained on a capital murder charge after a shooting that left three dead and three injured: Dr. Amy Bishop . The emerging portrait of her is typically sad and average. Our J-School Embed, Gawker contributor Hunter Walker, did some digging around, and found the following on Dr. Amy Bishop : Bishop’s a Harvard-educated biologist who’s an assistant professor at UAH. The three dead victims were all working in the Biology department, including the department’s chairman. Via the New York Times , Bishop’s denial of tenure is what supposedly triggered her violent rampage : “She began to talk about her problems getting tenure in a very forceful and animated way, saying it was unfair,” the associate said, referring to a conversation in which she blamed specific colleagues for her problems. “She seemed to be one of these persons who was just very open with her feelings,” he said. “A very smart, intense person who had a variety of opinions on issues.” Her profile on the university’s site shows that she specialized in “Molecular Biology of Oxidative Stress, Neurobiology, Neuroengineering, and Induced Adaptive Resistance.” Her most notable achievement in her field was the invention of InQ, a “cell growth incubator,” which was assisted by her husband, Jim Anderson. She was profiled by the Huntsville Times in 2006, to whom she boasted that her colleagues think the InQ will “change the face of tissue culture.” Whether or not it did is far less notable than the fact, that, as the teacher of “Anatomy and Physiology,” she wasn’t necessarily notable. Walker checked out her Rate My Professors profile, and found the following: RateMyProfessors.com has 34 reviews of Bishop’s class dating back to April, 2004. On a scale of one to five, Bishop received ratings of 2.3 for “average easiness,” 3.7 for “average helpfulness,” 3.4 for “average clarity,” and a “hotness total” of 0. Her “overall quality” was a 3.6. None of the postings describe Bishop as the kind of angry or mean person from whom we might have expected some sort of violent outburst. Several of the online reviews of her class say Bishop was “fair,” however not all of her students seem to have enjoyed her class. Multiple reviewers described Bishop as “brilliant” a smart teacher, who was eager to help out with extra study sessions, and taught an excellent class. There are also several reviews indicating that she is a “boring” teacher who “reads straight from the book” and “highlight[s] the book word for word.” Even more, Walker notes that she might have been a “fish out of water” on the UAH campus given her Ivy-League roots and her fairly liberal ideologies. More from her students: After classes ended last spring, a RateMyProfessors.com user said Bishop “is hot but she tries to hide it.And she is a socalist but she only talks about it after class.” In 2008, someone described her on the site by saying: “she’s a liberal from ‘Hahvahd’ and let’s you know exactly how she feels about particular subjects.” Finally, Walker found that she was a member of the “Clergy Letter Project,” which is devoted to connecting scientists with clergy members who “have questions about the science associated with all aspects of evolution.” For what it’s worth, Walker also recorded her outgoing voicemail message . Meanwhile, over at Media Elites, Steve Huff found that right-wing groups have already jumped on Bishop and her husband—who has also been detained, but not charged—and are using political views as put on display by Rate My Professors to fuel their rhetoric. Huff notes: Glenn Reynolds, the Instapundit, pointed this RateMyProfessors comment out and it was immediately picked up by other historically conservative bloggers. Because you know all the comments on “Rate My Professor” are true and valid reflections of a teacher’s personality, style and ability to do their job and not student perceptions and biases, right? Huff also dug up a complaint to the FTC by Bishop’s husband, which ends: “By the people … for the people …” not “Buy the people … for the Corporations …” Does a liberal ideology, an Ivy League education, and a husband who writes letters to the FTC make a rage-prone shooter? Not necessarily, but as we’ve learned, ideological extremities almost always definitely do. The extent of Bishop’s politics, ideas behind them, and the lifestyle to which Bishop and her husband inhibited them have yet to be fully fleshed out, but one thing—as each instance of breaking violence of this stripe happens proves without fail—is for sure: the pictures that can come together from aggregated information comes faster and deeper than the time before it, every time.

Read more:
University of Alabama Shooting Suspect Dr. Amy Bishop: A Politicized Composite Emerges

Italian-American Identity Crisis

For decades, the media has influenced public perception of Italian Americans; painting them as mobsters, gangsters, and most recently, as wild, party-going narcissists. VC2 producers Lou Rinaldi and Erick Kwiecien set out to see if the stereotypes have any truth in them. Their journey took them up and down the east coast, where they interviewed strangers, family members, and officers in the largest Italian-American service organization in the USA. added by: erickkwiecien

John Mayer’s Playboy Interview Caps A History Of TMI

Singer/guitarist’s recent attention-grabbing comments weren’t his first. By Gil Kaufman John Mayer Photo: MTV News John Mayer has a long-established reputation as a virtuoso guitar player and ladies’ man. But it’s one of Mayer’s other prodigious talents, his tendency to say and tweet outrageous comments, that has landed the “Waiting on the World to Change” singer in hot water this week. By now, you’ve probably read and/or heard about Mayer’s instantly infamous Playboy interview , in which he used the N-word and made sexually charged references to famous exes Jennifer Aniston and Jessica Simpson. Mayer quickly apologized for some of the comments he made in the interview, which also featured comments about black women and his ” ‘hood pass” that many have perceived as racist, including a number of prominent rappers . “I think it’s time to stop trying to be so raw in interviews,” Mayer said after the fact. “It started as an attempt to not let the waves of criticism get to me, but it’s gotten out of hand and I’ve created somewhat of a monster. I wanted to be a blues guitar player. And a singer. And a songwriter. Not a shock jock. I don’t have the stomach for it.” Indeed, the Playboy interview wasn’t the first time Mayer has said outrageous things or the first time he’s talked about not being able to stop himself from making potentially offensive comments. In October, Mayer sat down with MTV News’ Tim Kash and decried what he described as the “hatrix,” a fake Internet world of hate in which people criticize and put other people down. “People don’t like things that [are] purposely shocking,” he said. “They start to feel abused by it. … People are really concerned with what other people are saying about them.” While blasting the tabloid media that covers him and confidently saying his songs will last well beyond the gossip rags’ outrageous stories, Mayer said fans don’t need to worry about the effect those reports have on him. “All the things that play out in the media were, most of the time, by a choice I made in my life,” he said. “You make a choice in your life, and it affects your life in all the ways, good and bad.” In a cover story in January’s Rolling Stone magazine , writer Erik Hedegaard tackled head-on the insular world Mayer inhabits, titling his story, “The Dirty Mind and Lonely Heart of John Mayer,” with the subtitle, “He has everything a 32-year-old man could want. So why can’t rock’s biggest playboy shut up and enjoy?” What followed was six pages of Mayer’s stream-of-consciousness ranting, in which the reader learned that the “Daughters” singer has a $20 million watch collection, owns a bulletproof vest, can’t resist “poop Twitters,” believes he has “masturbated [himself] out of serious problems” in his life and describes how even in his sex dreams, he has to stop his virtual mate from grinding on him because he’s distracted by a phantom paparazzo. These were all very personal, TMI-style utterances that the average guarded modern pop star would never reveal. “I don’t know how much further I can do this before I’m a dead body on the side of the road,” he said. “I mean, either I’m a total f—ing nut case who can explain himself, or I’m really not crazy and I can explain myself. I don’t know yet.” If nothing else, Mayer is conflicted, at once painfully aware that he talks way too much, but seemingly unable to stop. “I have these accidents, these mistakes, these self-inflicted wounds, and then I tear my head to shreds about it for days,” he said about incidents such as the Playboy debacle (it’s unclear if he completed the men’s magazine interview before or after the Rolling Stone one). But, after a few days of reflection, he said, he typically decides he can’t just be quiet. “I don’t want to detach. I don’t want to go live in a gated community. So I will continue to make these worldwide dignity mistakes as often as it takes to not make them anymore.” Related Artists John Mayer

Go here to read the rest:
John Mayer’s Playboy Interview Caps A History Of TMI

Robert Gibbs Has a Comedy Problem

Today, Politico published a hard-hitting report: ” Press Room Laughter Dies Down .” No one is laughing any more at Robert Gibbs! But is it because of a change in “tone,” or because Robert Gibbs is the least funny person in D.C.? It’s the second one. Politico has so many reporters milling around their newsroom watching C-Span that they threw three on the task of sifting through White House press briefings and totaling up the number of times reporters laughed at Robert Gibbs’ press conferences: In the first six months, there was an average of 179 laughs per month—six laughs per day! And so Gibbs became “the funny press secretary”. How did Robert Gibbs get more laughs than Bush’s last two press secretaries plus all post- Happy Gilmore Adam Sandler films combined? Perusing Gibbs’ cringe-y comedic output suggests it was the instictive laughter of relief—a bunch of reporters surprised and delighted to find they had emerged from the class 5 hurricane of the Bush era relatively unscathed. God knows we also wandered the streets for months after the election, deliriously cackling at bums and trees. Ha ha! We made it! But now that everything has settled in, the press corps is able to see Gibbs for the hack that he is: In its second six months, The Robert Gibbs Show generated just 89 laughs/month. (For comparison, a “top stand-up comedy set” gets ” a minimum of 4-6 laughs per minutes .”) Gibbs’ crack wit was on display most recently with his dig at Sarah Palin’s handwritten notes : What could have been a decent bit was made unwatchable by Gibbs’ hokey delivery. Look at me, guys—I’m making a funny! Sarah Palin’s own hand-gate gag— conspicuously writing “Hi Mom” on her hand and waving it around at cameras—was way funnier. Palin’s was a pretty smart, underhanded jab that turned the media back on itself, where Gates’ was a clownish jape meant to please the reporters that are his only reason for existence. Some clowns are funny—think, Charlie Chaplin—but most are sad. A clown is sad because he is so desperate for laughs that he smears an artificial smile on his face; he is always the first to laugh at his own jokes. And so is Gibbs, as evidenced by this truly funny Politico mash-up , “Gibbs Giggles”: A key rule of comedy is: Never laugh at your own jokes. But it often seems Gibbs is attempting only to amuse himself. Like this aborted joke about the “drawing lines in the sand” cliche. It that starts in Gibbs’ own addled brain and ends up bombing with more force than a GBU-28 Bunker Buster missile striking a known Al Qaeda target: What’s sad about this is that the Q & A format of a White House presser is structured perfectly for jokes: Gibbs has a couple dozen straight-men lobbing set-ups at him for an hour. All he needs to do is knock ’em down. The missed opportunities! Like this exchange: REPORTER: Chris Wallace called you the biggest bunch of crybabies I’ve seen in Washington… what’s your reaction? GIBBS: Well… I haven’t cried yet! (LAUGHTER) Here’s what he should have said: Wallace must have been talking about Sasha. Talk about Princess and the Pea. Can’t even give her a little ribbing without her running to Michelle, all: ‘Wah wah, Gibbs called me ‘Little Hitler’ again.” Somebody book that girl on O’Reilly so he can scream in her face for forty minutes. Jesus. Maybe you don’t care about the fact that Robert Gibbs makes Jay Leno look like Mitch Hedberg. But think about this: Gibbs’ words are going down in history. Literally! Some of his words will end up in a history book, probably! And if Gibbs is going to make jokes at press conferences—which we are totally in favor of, by the way—they should be held to the same standard as any of his other utterances. Otherwise, this incredible, real life exchange from a press conference last month will be how our children remember our first black president: REPORTER: Robert, I wanted to go back to the broader message of the Massachusetts election. The tone of your comments yesterday seemed to suggest that you were absorbing the message from that and that there was anger and frustration. But does that mean that there’s any kind of regrouping going on, any kind of change in the agenda, or is there a feeling that the agenda is perfectly fine as it is but it’s just a matter of communicating it better? MR. GIBBS: No, look, this isn’t a “Cool Hand Luke” problem, right? It took a while. Mark, come on, help me out a little bit, right — “failure to communicate.” REPORTER: I had no idea what that meant.

See the original post:
Robert Gibbs Has a Comedy Problem

New For DSM-V: White House Press Personality Disorder

Two days ago, NBC News White House correspondent Chuck Todd was whining to the Washington Post that Barack Obama doesn’t talk to the press enough. Yesterday, Obama talked to the press. Today, Todd whined about Obama talking to the press. The point has repeatedly been made that the men and women who cover the White House are a needy, preening, insecure, irrational, and emotionally unstable pack of professional stalkers whose confused feelings of adulation, jealousy, covetousness, and hatred for the man whose decisions and behavior govern the contours of their careers has corroded into an indecipherable slurry of rage and bottomless longing. But it bears repeating! The sheer clueless gall of the reporters, including Todd, who whined to the Post ‘s Howard Kurtz on Monday about Obama’s unavailability to the press was astonishing enough given the long and documented history of complaints as recently as six months ago that Obama was “overexposed.” But for Todd to wonder aloud today whether Obama erred in doing precisely what he demanded that Obama do just 48 hours ago has to be some sort of cry for help—a howl of pain from a troubled man in the grips of affliction that we’ll call White House Personality Disorder. Here’s Todd on Monday, complaining to Kurtz about being cut off from Obama’s inner thoughts and deepest desires: NBC White House reporter Chuck Todd calls the situation a “shame,” saying the administration is trying to control the message rather than allowing Obama to be seen “unscripted.” Here he was this morning, on his MSNBC show, complaining to former Clinton spokesman Joe Lockhart about Obama being too omnipresent: I’ll be honest—it felt like he didn’t have a lot of news to announce…. Is it good to put the president out on a day like that, when you don’t have a lot of news to announce? This rapidfire and profoundly irrational vacillation between spurned desire and outraged rejection is characteristic of White House Press Personality Disorder, a variant of borderline personality disorder unique to the hothouse environment of the D.C. press corps, where the intense pressures to both love and hate, protect and attack a single powerful father figure whom reporters are endlessly charged with thinking and talking about deforms fragile psyches every day. The National Institute of Mental Health’s analysis of borderline personality disorder can be transferred quite cleanly to its White House cousin: People with BPD often have highly unstable patterns of social relationships. While they can develop intense but stormy attachments, their attitudes towards family, friends, and loved ones may suddenly shift from idealization (great admiration and love) to devaluation (intense anger and dislike). Thus, they may form an immediate attachment and idealize the other person, but when a slight separation or conflict occurs, they switch unexpectedly to the other extreme and angrily accuse the other person of not caring for them at all. That sounds very familiar . The “Obama never talks to us” complaints came on the heels of a universal round of “Obama’s performance in from the of the Republicans was awesome” hallelujahs, which came on the heels of an unrelenting barrage of “Obama’s lost his mojo” analyses, which came on the heels of a round of “Obama’s State of the Union speech was a powerful performance” reports, and on and on in a ceaseless up-and-down series of “stormy attachments” and sudden “devaluations.” White House Press Personality Disorder is also characterized by obsessive nitpicking and a tendency to impute significance to objectively meaningless data, which can be seen in today’s Politico story discerning a troubling decline in the number of times the word “[LAUGHTER]” appears in transcripts of the White House press briefings : In the first six months of the Obama administration, briefings produced an average of 179 laughs per month. Over the past six months, the average has dropped down to 89. [snip] “There definitely aren’t a lot of laughs around the briefing room these days,” says Washington Examiner White House correspondent Julie Mason. “Robert’s little digs and evasions have lost their power to amuse – particularly since we haven’t had a presser since July.” The piece was published at 4 a.m. today—early bird WINS THE DAY!—so we can presume that Politico’s Patrick Gavin, who chronicled the death of laughter, interviewed Mason yesterday, which means that she uttered the words “particularly since we haven’t had a presser since July” on the day that Barack Obama held a presser . What’s unclear from Gavin’s account of the mirthless briefing room is whether the missing “[LAUGHTER]”s are due to Gibbs attempting fewer gags or getting fewer laughs for the gags he attempts. But whatever: We know that the briefings are now morose and somber affairs owing to Obama refusal to talk to the press except for yesterday. This is what these people make us think of:

Go here to read the rest:
New For DSM-V: White House Press Personality Disorder

White House Hits Palin with Open Hand Slap

Filed under: Politix The White House Press Secretary just openly mocked Sarah Palin — and he delivered the blow with the palm of his hand. Robert Gibbs just addressed the media with a mini grocery list written on his hand — plus two smart-ass additions: Eggs, Milk, … Permalink

Go here to read the rest:
White House Hits Palin with Open Hand Slap

How to Destroy a Perfectly Good Fake Trend Story

We all know that New York Times fake trend stories are annoying because they are 1) fake, and 2) trend stories. But do not neglect their third worst quality: many are terribly written. Allow us to show you. The underlying cause of the poorest-written portions of most fake trend stories is the insistence by NYT editors that every fake trend story have some sort of “stats” graf—a graf that attempts to force a clearly made-up premise into an empirically justifiable form. Since fake trend stories are, by definition, pure bullshit, this requirement often results in the most tortured or transparently ridiculous part of what could have been a perfectly decent story, had it been upfront about its total lack of journalistic merit. Examples: The Run-On Nightmare: The NYT’s in-house grammar scold highlights this (14 verb forms in one sentence!), from last month’s “H ipsters are living in cold apartments ” piece: As Americans across the country wrestle with spouses and their thermostats over how low to go – as they join contests like Freeze Yer Buns, now in its third year, a challenge posed by Deanna Duke, a Seattle-based environmental blogger who calls herself the Crunchy Chicken, to lower the thermostat to around 55 degrees, or follow the lead of the Maine couple trying to live comfortably in a furnace-free house and blogging about it in their Cold House Journal – there are those who are living nearly without heat by choice, and doing just fine, thank you very much. The Unsupported Anecdote-to-Wide Angle Pivot: From September’s ” Everybody is jogging with their babies now ” fitness piece : Mrs. Keith is an extreme example of an increasingly common breed of runner: parents who hit the road with their offspring in jogging strollers, typically single or double versions with two 16-inch inflatable tires in back and a single tire in front. But, experts say, there is a learning curve to running with a stroller. The Futile Attempt to Disprove Its Own Acknowledgment of Preposterousness: From Guy Trebay’s lively expos

Tim Tebow's Anti-Abortion Super Bowl Ad

This controversial ad from Focus on the Family leaked a little early today. Gotcha Media Watch

infoMania: Best Clips, Week of 2.4.10

The Grammy Awards, Miss America, the final season of 'Lost', National Geographic's 'Taboo,' and the web's biggest muscles. infoMania is a half-hour satirical news show that airs on Current TV. The show puts a comedic spin on the 24-hour chaos and information overload brought about by the constant bombardment of the media. Hosted by Conor Knighton and co-starring Brett Erlich, Sarah Haskins, Ben Hoffman, Bryan Safi and Sergio Cilli, the show airs on Thursdays at 10 pm Eastern and Pacific Times and can be found online at http://current.com/infomania/ or on Current TV. And make sure to check out our facebook profile for special features at http://infomaniafacebook.com . added by: infoMania