Tag Archives: naacp

Who Looked More Bangin??? Vanessa Williams Vs. Tracee Ellis Ross

Vanessa Williams and Tracee Ellis Ross hit up the NAACP Image Announcements today in Beverly Hills. Both ladies had two different looks, but you know we gotta ask… Who Looked More Bangin??? Splashnews More On Bossip! Get Your Life Together: 10 Classic Junk Food Snacks That Will Turn You Into A Paula Deen Chubby-Lumpkins Visitation Hours: Famous Dads That Are Always With Their Kids Even Though It Didn’t Work Out With Mommy X-Rated Bangers: The Hottest Black Adult Movie Stars In The Biz…Would You Wife Any Of Them? Part 3! Beautifully Coupled Up: Look At This Atlanta Falcons Player And His Boo’s Engagement Pics

See original here:
Who Looked More Bangin??? Vanessa Williams Vs. Tracee Ellis Ross

Atlanta NAACP Freedom Fund Awards and Dinner Honoring Dwight Howard, Elisabeth Omilami, Ron Clark, & More.

More here:

This past Saturday I had the pleasure of attending the Atlanta Chapter of the NAACP “Jondelle Johnson Freedom Fund Dinner”. I was very impressed. A very elegant, informative, heartwarming, classy event. They invited prestigious VIPS to honor them for their hard-working community service  which included  NBA star Dwight Howard, well known educator Ron Clark , actor and activist Elisabeth Omilami (Hosea Feed the Hungry) and Maurice “Reec” Swiney. All of the recipients delivered  impressive speeches and positive messages. What a great night. “The Jondelle Johnson Freedom Fund Awards Dinner is one of the most impressive lineups of VIP’s to be held in the social justice arena.  Mrs. Jondelle was affectionately known as “Mrs. NAACP” to many who knew her. She was the epitome of dedication, perseverance, and service. The Jondelle Johnson Legacy Award recognizes those who exemplify these characteristics.”  All the recipients of the Awards gave stellar speeches that were inspiring. The first recipient Elisabeth Omilami recieved the  Legacy Award for her consistent efforts with Hosea Feed the Homeless. Upon the receipt of her award she gave a speech of such magnitude that when Dwight Howard accepted his award he referred to Mrs. Omilami as “Maya Angelou the Second.” Dwight Howard speech was very moving because it was so sincere, affectionate and heartfelt. He has helped so many children in Atlanta, across the U.S and Haiti. He stated that a mentor told him at a very early age “to use basketball as a vehicle to change the world”. Last but not least Ron Clark received the President’s Award for his impact on the students at his academy. He was so happy to receive the award that he didn’t want to give the mic back to the President of the NAACP!  However, his time was well used. Ron Clark charged everyone at the dinner to make a difference in the life of a child. There were many great guests in the building, including the students from the Ron Clark Academy, Emmy Award Winning Poet, Hank Stewart,  and Grammy Award winning Singer Kandi from the Real Housewives of Atlanta. Where else can you get style, fashion, basketball, poetry, volunteerism and education…Only at the Jondelle Johnson Freedom Fund Dinner, I know that Mrs. Jondelle Johnson  was smiling down on the event very proud.” (Yolanda, examiner.com) For information  on how you can make a difference in the world….contact NAACP …email: freedomfund@naacpatlanta.org or call (404) 756-5447. WAKE UP EACH MORNING AND ASK YOURSELF….WHAT AM I DOING TO HELP SOMEONE? HOW CAN I HELP SOMEONE TODAY? IT DOESN’T HAVE TO BE ANYTHING EXTRAVAGANT OR COSTLY…YOU CAN MAKE SOMEONE’S DAY BY GIVING A HOT MEAL WHEN THEY DON’T HAVE THE MEANS OF BUYING FOOD ON THEIR OWN..OR SIMPLY VOLUNTEERING AN HOUR OUT OF YOUR DAY TO GIVE BACK TO THE COMMUNITY…IT’S THE LITTLE THINGS THAT COUNT PEOPLE. LET’S WAKE UP AND HELP EACH OTHER EACH AND EVERYDAY! ~~JAZZY MCBEE Pictures courtesy of Chanda Scott/Tastemaker Magazine

Atlanta NAACP Freedom Fund Awards and Dinner Honoring Dwight Howard, Elisabeth Omilami, Ron Clark, & More.

Raven & Romeo Show Out At The NAACP Theatre Awards [PHOTOS]

Link:

The 21st Annual NAACP Theatre Awards went down last night in Los Angeles where Raven-Symone received the Spirit Award for bringing energy, tenacity, innovation, commitment and talent to the local theater scene. (She starred in “Father’s Day” with Rosie Perez earlier this year). The “Salute To Black Theatre” event also brought out Diahann Carroll, who received the Lifetime Achievement Award. The veteran actress is a Tony Award Winner, Emmy and Grammy Nominee, Golden Globe Winner, and Best Actress Oscar Nominee. Host Niecy Nash and Wendy Raquel Robinson looked glamourous in white, while Jurnee Smollett and Jill Marie Jones wore brighter-hued frocks. Romeo, one of the few male attendees, of course, showed off his muscles on the red carpet. Raven-Symone: “My Perfect Man Would Be A Mannequin” Raven-Symone Shows Off Amazing New Body For Shoot [PHOTOS] Are Romeo & Jordin Sparks Dating? [PHOTO & VIDEO]

Raven & Romeo Show Out At The NAACP Theatre Awards [PHOTOS]

Photos From The 2011 NAACP Image Awards

Read more:

Halle Berry looked stunning at this year’s NAACP Image Awards. The event took place this weekend in LA where Denzel Washington, Willow Smith, Halle Berry and Tyler Perry won big. Halle won an award for her performance in “Frankie And Alice.” “If it were not for the NAACP, a little girl like me would not have had wind beneath her wings in a small town in Ohio,” Halle said. “I have never been more proud to be a Black woman.” -Halle Berry Idris Elba: “The Oscars Aren’t Designed For Us” Tyler Perry Thanks Black Women For His Wins At 42nd Annual NAACP Image Awards

Photos From The 2011 NAACP Image Awards

NAACP’s Ben Jealous: Beck’s Audience Wouldn’t Applaud for Dr. King Speech

Ben Jealous, president of the NAACP, told Eyeblast.tv that if Martin Luther King’s ‘I Have A Dream’ speech were read to the crowd at the ‘Restoring Honor’ rally, no one would applaud. That’s a round-about way of him calling the crowd racist. So, Glenn Beck’s rally audience is racist. Wow, did Ben Jealous think that up all by himself?

Visit link:
NAACP’s Ben Jealous: Beck’s Audience Wouldn’t Applaud for Dr. King Speech

Politico’s VandeHei Takes NAACP to Task for Labeling Tea Party Racist

Appearing on Wednesday’s Dylan Ratigan Show on MSNBC to discuss the Shirley Sherrod controversy, Politico co-founder Jim VandeHei pointed out the NAACP’s role in fueling racial accusations: “If you think about this, where this thing started, the NAACP comes out and makes this charge against the tea party movement.” VandeHei rejected the NAACP’s claim of racism in the political movement: “It’s a very, very diffuse group. You cannot say that they are racist anymore then you can say the Republican Party’s racist or the Democratic Party is racist, so it creates this culture and it’s a dangerous topic, it’s a dangerous fire to light, and then when it happens this is the outcome.” Explaining how the NAACP charge led to the accusations against Sherrod, VandeHei observed: “I’m not defending Breitbart. But conservatives are outraged, they feel like ‘listen, you’re – because I’m part of the tea party movement you say, therefore, I’m racist.’ And so what Breitbart’s arguing is ‘I want to push back.'” Opposite VandeHei was Washington Post writer Jonathan Capehart, who tried to excuse the civil rights organization: “The NAACP went to great lengths to say they were talking about racist elements within the tea party movement….Very nuanced thing here. He’s not broad-brushing the movement.” VandeHei countered: “…very nuanced but very explosive. They knew exactly once you make that statement, whether you’re trying to add nuance to the statement or not, you know exactly what’s going to happen when you make that charge.” Here is a transcript of the July 21 exchange: 4:18PM JIM VANDEHEI: Can I talk about the NAACP for one second. DYLAN RATIGAN: Go for it. VANDEHEI: Because I do think they’re getting off the hook a little bit. RATIGAN: I agree with you. VANDEHEI: If you think about this, where this thing started, the NAACP comes out and makes this charge against the tea party movement. RATIGAN: Yeah. VANDEHEI: We’ve probably written more stories about the tea party movement than any other organization. We’ve really tried to study this group. It’s a very, very diffuse group. You cannot say that they are racist anymore then you can say the Republican Party’s racist or the Democratic Party is racist, so it creates this culture and it’s a dangerous topic, it’s a dangerous fire to light, and then when it happens this is the outcome. So conservatives- JONATHAN CAPEHART: But Jim- VANDEHEI: I’m not defending Breitbart. But conservatives are outraged, they feel like ‘listen, you’re – because I’m part of the tea party movement you say, therefore, I’m racist.’ And so what Breitbart’s arguing is ‘I want to push back.’ Now I’m not saying what Breitbart did was right because clearly it wasn’t right and the outcome was awful for this woman, but both sides, I think, come off looking very, very bad and that’s why Joe Biden and – and Steny Hoyer both said they didn’t agree with the NAACP’s charge. RATIGAN: Go ahead, Jonathan. CAPEHART: Jim, but here’s the thing. The NAACP went to great lengths to say they were talking about racist elements within the tea party movement and even Ben Jealous said point blank that he did not say – think that the entire tea party movement was racist. He wanted leaders of the tea party movement to disavow those racist elements. Very nuanced thing here. He’s not broad-brushing the movement. VANDEHEI: Very nuanced, but Jonathan – but very nuanced but very explosive. They knew exactly once you make that statement, whether you’re trying to add nuance to the statement or not, you know exactly what’s going to happen when you make that charge, whether it’s elements or how nuanced they’re trying to be. CAPEHART: So then- VANDEHEI: Especially – this is a terrible issue to be talking about. CAPEHART: But then we can- VANDEHEI: And it’s the reason that Barack Obama does not want to talk about it. Barack Obama has tried very- CAPEHART: But then we can never have a conversation about race if – I mean, you have – it’s all about nuance. VANDEHEI: I feel like we’ve been having a conversation p about race for a long, long time in this country- CAPEHART: We always will.

Visit link:
Politico’s VandeHei Takes NAACP to Task for Labeling Tea Party Racist

CBS: Financial Reform ‘Another Huge Milestone For President Obama’

On Wednesday’s CBS Early Show, fill-in co-host Erica Hill cheered the passage of financial reform legislation as “another huge milestone for President Obama.” Hill went on to explain: “The first was when he signed the historic health care bill back in March. Today he is set to sign a bill aimed at completely overhauling Wall Street.” White House correspondent Chip Reid began a report on the new bill by proclaiming: “It’s being hailed as the biggest shakeup of Wall Street since the Great Depression.” Reid enthusiastically touted provisions in the legislation: “The bill’s centerpiece is the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection….charged with regulating financial products, including mortgages, credit cards, and student loans. The legislation also gives broad new powers to the federal government, allowing it to take control of and shut down large financial institutions…” Reid pointed out criticism of the legislation: “But critics say the bill fails to reform mortgage giants Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, does not create a fund to help shut down big banks when they fail, and gives too much power to federal regulators to create reams of new rules.” After noting GOP concern that bill “will curb growth and kill jobs,” Reid turned to an analyst from the left-leaning Brookings Institution for reassurance: “Still, former investment banker Douglas Elliott believes the bill is better than doing nothing.” Elliott argued: “The bill addresses most of the problems and makes a good start. It’s not perfection, but in the real world, we don’t get perfection.” Reid concluded his report by declaring: “And adding to his accomplishments, later this week the President is expected to sign a bill extending unemployment benefits to millions of Americans.” During a report on the July 15 Evening News , Reid celebrated the financial reform bill as a “big win” for Obama and that “he’ll add it to a long list, headlined by health care reform and the stimulus.” On Tuesday’s Early Show , Reid described the extension of unemployment benefits in similar terms: “Democrats appear to have won a major battle in the long fight to extend unemployment benefits.” Here is a full transcript of the July 21 Early Show segment: 7:00AM TEASE ERICA HILL: Financial reform. President Obama set to sign a bill that will radically alter the way Wall Street does business. But does it go far enough?                                      7:04AM SEGMENT HILL: It is another huge milestone for President Obama. The first was when he signed the historic health care bill back in March. Today he is set to sign a bill aimed at completely overhauling Wall Street. CBS News chief White House correspondent Chip Reid joins us this morning with more. Chip, good morning. CHIP REID: Well, good morning, Erica. It’s being hailed as the biggest shakeup of Wall Street since the Great Depression. And while this bill does have teeth, some critics say it doesn’t have a big enough bite. [ON-SCREEN HEADLINE: Financial Reform Bill Becomes Law; Obama to Sign Sweeping Legislation Today] The bill’s centerpiece is the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection that will be housed within the Federal Reserve. It’s charged with regulating financial products, including mortgages, credit cards, and student loans. The legislation also gives broad new powers to the federal government, allowing it to take control of and shut down large financial institutions like Lehman Brothers, which went bankrupt in 2008. President Obama hailed its passage. BARACK OBAMA: Because of this reform, the American people will never again be asked to foot the bill for Wall Street’s mistakes. There will be no more taxpayer-funded bailouts, period. REID: But critics say the bill fails to reform mortgage giants Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, does not create a fund to help shut down big banks when they fail, and gives too much power to federal regulators to create reams of new rules. Republicans, who almost universally opposed this legislation, argue it will curb growth and kill jobs at a time when the nation can least afford it. JOHN BOEHNER: I think it ought to be repealed. REID: Still, former investment banker Douglas Elliott believes the bill is better than doing nothing. DOUGLAS ELLIOT [FELLOW, BROOKINGS INSTITUTION]: The bill addresses most of the problems and makes a good start. It’s not perfection, but in the real world, we don’t get perfection. REID: And adding to his accomplishments, later this week the President is expected to sign a bill extending unemployment benefits to millions of Americans. Erica. HILL: Chip Reid this morning. Chip, thanks. REID: Joining us now CBS News business and economics correspondent Rebecca Jarvis with a closer look at how these changes could affect you and me, the average consumer, everybody at home. So first up, we know this law is establishing the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, that’s going to regulate mortgages, credit cards, student loans. What does it really mean? REBECCA JARVIS: All the things, Erica, that we deal with on a daily basis as consumers are now going to fall under the jurisdiction of this consumer protection bureau. And there are a lot of things that we’ll see as changes in our lives as a result. For example, mortgages, clearly a big problem with the crisis that we faced have been housing prices as well as mortgage crises. And we will see, as consumers, big relief for mortgages. So for example, if you got an adjustable rate mortgage, it used to be that you couldn’t pay it back without paying a big penalty – pay it back early – without paying a big penalty. Now, you will see the relief in that you can save those thousands of dollars in penalties because you can pay it back without – early – without paying the penalty on top of that. Banks now, they are forbidden from giving out bonuses for particular types of mortgages. So, in some cases, back in the crisis, they would give out a mortgage that was bad for us but good for them. They can’t do that anymore. HILL: Because they would make a little extra money off of it. I know credit scores are also going to be effected here. Talk to me about how, because that’s always so confusing. JARVIS: Well, of course, our credit score is the thing that gives us every opportunity in the financial world. The way credit scores will be impacted is that we will be able to learn our credit score. If you go out and apply for a loan, you apply for a credit card, you apply for an apartment, and you get turned down for that, you have every right to ask for a free credit score and to understand the reason that the vendor turned you down. HILL: What a novel concept. You get access to your own information. I love that. There’s also a change about how you pay for things at the register. JARVIS: Yes, there will be some big changes at the register. First of all, you probably are going to have to carry a little more cash on hand if you want to go out and get a cup of java, for example, because merchants, under new regulations, are allowed to set limits on the amount that you can spend with a credit card. So for example, you walk up to the register, they say, no purchases with a credit card under $10, they’re allowed to do that. HILL: Which you actually see a lot of now, or they ask you not to. JARVIS: You do and now it’s legal. HILL: And they also, in some – I’ve noticed in some stores – some stores charge you less, or a gas station, if you pay with cash or a debit card, as opposed to a credit card. That’s going to be more permissible as well. JARVIS: That’s permissible. What is not permissible, Erica, is if they try and say you get a deal for using one credit card over another. You can’t have one credit card be – for example, Amex a better deal than Visa. HILL: Got you. Rebecca, good to have you here, as always. JARVIS: Thanks, Erica. HILL: Thanks for breaking it down.

Read more from the original source:
CBS: Financial Reform ‘Another Huge Milestone For President Obama’

Rush Limbaugh Responds to JournoLister Wishing His Death

Conservative talk radio host Rush Limbaugh has responded to reports that an NPR producer wrote gleefully about his death in an e-mail message to the now infamous JournoList. As NewsBusters reported Wednesday, the Daily Caller’s Jonathan Strong published some more of the liberal group’s e-mail messages which included Sarah Spitz claiming that she would “Laugh loudly like a maniac and watch his eyes bug out” as Limbaugh writhed in torment. With this in mind, both the Washington Examiner’s Byron York and myself asked Limbaugh for a response to this nonsense.  First, here’s what Limbaugh told York: I can only surmise. I think most people on the left live in a world where merit is irrelevant. Theirs is a world in which connections, networking, kissing ass and obedient sameness are rewarded. I am the antithesis of all that. I am a legitimate, achieved and accomplished Number One and I’ve made it on my own and without them and without having followed their proscriptions. I think they are also jealous that I just sold my NY condo for a 125 percent profit while their homes are worthlessly underwater. Funny thing….a number of my friends sent me the Daily Caller piece and the most shocking thing to them in the story was the advocacy of having government shut down Fox News. That the left wants me dead was not a big deal to them because it was nothing new to them. I think that’s hilarious. And about that: how about the LAW professor who thinks the FCC can pull Fox’s license? Fox does not have a license. The FCC does not grant Fox its right to exist. And this guy teaches law. Moments after York’s piece was published, I asked Limbaugh via e-mail if there was anything he wanted to add. This was his response: And it is not just that they hate how I became who I am. They literally hate ME. They hate me because I am the most prominent, effective and unrelenting voice of conservatism and they have not been able to stop me. These people and their tactics are not new, we’ve seen them before in other countries and other times. They want to destroy contrary and opposition voices and views. They will climb over the law and the people to achieve their aims. Earlier in this administration, the president and his hacks targeted me, his party targeted me and their groups targeted me. They are all the same. They are leftists, disguised as lawyers, judges, scholars, professors, teachers, reporters, anchors, senators, representatives, legislative aids, congressional staff, federal bureaucrats, etc. There is NO Media. We know that now. There is just an incestuous relationship among all these various groups and a revolving door connecting them all. Indeed. NewsBusters has been  reporting  for years politicians transferring to news outlets and vice versa, which clearly facilitates the – ahem – incest. This supports Limbaugh’s view that there isn’t an independent mainstream press anymore for they all seem connected to the Democrat Party in one way or another. Scary thought, isn’t it?  

More:
Rush Limbaugh Responds to JournoLister Wishing His Death

NAACP’s Attack on ‘Racist’ Tea Party Revives is Relevancy, According to Media

What’s the key to pulling your political organization out of “irrelevancy”? Well if you’re the NAACP, you can start by hammering on allegations of Tea Party “racism.” News coverage of the NAACP has exploded since the “nation’s oldest and largest civil rights organization” passed a resolution last week attacking the Tea Party for including “racist” elements in its organization. Not only has the story spawned hundreds of news articles, but the network news stations have also taken notice. In just six days – from July 13 to July 18 – the NAACP’s feud with the Tea Party was discussed on eight network news shows on ABC, CBS and NBC. “And what about the NAACP`s new charges of racism against elements of the Tea Party? We`ll bring in the head of the NAACP, Ben Jealous, and one of the leaders of the Tea Party, David Webb,” Bob Schieffer said on “CBS Evening News” on July 18. On “World News with Diane Sawyer” on July 13, Sawyer reported that “the NAACP has just adopted a resolution this evening at its annual convention condemning ‘racist behavior’ by Tea Party members. Tonight, Tea Party is fighting back…” But Americans might want to ask themselves why this story is even making news. In recent years, the media has buzzed over the NAACP’s “irrelevancy” – and even the NAACP itself raised the question over whether it was relevant as a political and social arm just two years ago. The organization cited “declining membership, closing of regional offices and ineffective marketing” as reasons critics used to attack its political significance. At this time last year, as the NAACP prepared to hold its centennial conference, several commentators and reporters dismissed the group as ineffective and unnecessary. “I fear that the NAACP is making itself irrelevant,” Clarence Page wrote in the Chicago Tribune on July 15, 2009. “If we did not have the NAACP these days, would anybody notice the difference?” Robert Smith, a sociology professor at San Francisco State University, echoed Page’s concerns in a July 16, 2009 Newsday article. “[T]he NAACP as an agent of national change has been irrelevant for a long time now,” he said. Last week, UPI raised a similar question, publishing an article titled, “NAACP strives to stay relevant” on July 14. “The NAACP is facing the question of whether it remains relevant after the election of the nation’s first black president, officials say,” reported UPI. “In its upcoming 101st annual meeting, President Benjamin Jealous and the new NAACP chairwoman, Roslyn Brock, say they intend to inject energy into the organization as it aims to stay a force in national debates, The Washington Post reported Wednesday.” But with all of the media attention the NAACP has been receiving over their Tea Party resolution, it seems like irrelevancy is becoming less of a problem. On July 13, the NAACP passed a resolution stating that it “condemns the bigoted elements within the Tea Party and asks for them to be repudiated. The NAACP delegates presented this resolution for debate and passage after a year of vitriolic Tea Party demonstrations during which participants used racial slurs and images.” The media’s sudden interest in the NAACP’s Tea Party resolution supports the liberal narrative of Tea Party racism. This is evidenced further by how the media have aided in the character assassination campaign directed at conservative demonstrators by repeating unfounded allegations of Tea Party racism. One example is the unproven claim that Tea Partiers spit on civil rights leader. In a column for The Politico, University of Maryland School of Law professor Sherrilyn Ifill said that “elements in the movement that have displayed racist posters of President Barack Obama, spit at black congressmen and used veiled language to warn that ‘our way of life’ is threatened by our first black president.” In another instance in a July 18 Washington Post column, Sophia A. Nelson wrote that “I abhor and reject anyone who would spit upon or yell racial epithets at an esteemed public servant such as Rep. John Lewis (D-Ga.), and other black members of Congress, as tea party supporters reportedly have done.” Even some news articles reported this unsubstantiated claim. “Rep. John Lewis, D-Ga., a leader of the civil rights movement, was called the ‘n-word’ during the protest, while others in the crowd used anti-gay slurs against Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass,” reported RTT News on July 17. “Further, the NAACP said that Missouri Representative Emmanuel Cleaver was spat on at the protest.” However, according to video footage from the event, claims that a congressman was spit on were never confirmed. Andrew Breitbart, founder of BigJournalism.com, even offered $100,000 for video of the alleged incident. However, even though many cameras were recording the scene, nobody came forward with evidence of an assault. Other newspapers have lent a platform to the claims that the Tea Party movement is about racism as opposed to supporting principles of free market and limited government. “[N]o president in history has had so much racist vitriol directed at him as the current one, including being compared to a monkey and having his birthplace and religion endlessly questioned,” Lynne K. Varner wrote in the Athens Banner-Herald on July 17. “The tea-party movement tries to hide behind limited government and restrained spending, classic – and in my view, unassailable – conservative tenets. But what separates this movement from the traditional Republican Party is the former’s virulent anger directed at anyone who is not white, straight and Protestant,” Varner continued. It’s telling that the media would resurrect the NAACP from irrelevance just at the moment the NAACP produces a resolution that supports what many writers and reporters have incorrectly believed all along – that the Tea Party is a racist organization that opposes President Obama for the color of his skin as opposed to his policies. Like this article? Sign up for “Culture Links,” CMI’s weekly e-mail newsletter, by clicking here.

Bozell Column: The NAACP Cries Racism

Almost from the moment Barack Obama declared he would run for president in 2007, our enraptured media elite has been accusing anyone who would stand in Obama’s way with racism. The question was never whether Obama was ready to govern the country, but whether the country was ready for the historic awesomeness of Obama. Pity the NAACP. We now have a black president, and they must convince (racist) America that there still exists the need for a national association to advance “colored people” in our society. How to do it? Identify and condemn as “racists” anyone or any group opposed to Barack Obama. Apparently you cannot sincerely oppose a crushing tax burden, a useless “stimulus” bill, ObamaCare, or any other element of his socialist agenda without being tagged as a bigot. In case there was any doubt that the NAACP was carrying water for the White House political machine, Michelle Obama appeared before the NAACP convention and insisted there was still persistent racism in America, and the group’s founders would “urge us to increase our intensity” – to fight for President Obama. The merger is so obvious they could now be called the NAA-DNC. Now the NAACP has found its mojo. It is slandering the Tea Party as “racist.” In an article on CNN.com headlined “The Tea Party Must Police Itself,” NAACP chief Benjamin Jealous smeared the entire movement: “The avowed racist David Duke notes that thousands of Tea Party activists have urged him to run for president. When the Tea Party marches by, Duke thinks it’s his fiesta.” Since when did the NAACP – or anyone else, for that matter– give a hoot what David Duke thinks of anything? On its own website, the NAACP continues to rehash all those unproven allegations that “respected members of the Congressional Black Caucus reported that racial epithets were hurled at them as they passed by aWashington, DC health care protest.” But let’s stop calling them “unproven allegations.” Let’s call them what they are: lies. There is no video evidence that this ever occurred, but the NAACP doesn’t care about the evidence in its kangaroo court. They even repeated that “Representative Emanuel Cleaver was spat upon during the incident.” In the real world, Cleaver quickly walked away from his own story when video footage proved it wasn’t true. The NAACP’s video recounting the “racism” of the Tea Party had plenty of objectionable signs suggesting Obama was a fascist and “It’s 1939 Germany all over again.” Someone needs to research the meaning of the word “racism.” It gets better. The NAACP-endorsed video of purportedly racist signs even includes two shots of Confederate flags and “hateful” messages like “We Need a Christian President” and the sitcom catch phrase “What You Talking About, Willis?” A poster imposing Obama’s face with a Mr. T Mohawk hairdo next to the words “Gimme Yo Change” may be odd, but it’s not racist. It sure sounds like there weren’t many racist signs at Tea Party rallies if that’s all they could muster. But “Bush Lied, Thousands Died” – that’s okay. The bigger problem for the NAACP is that it has its very own racists. Andrew Breitbart’s Big Government website revealed video of a NAACP banquet where U.S. Department of Agriculture appointee Shirley Sherrod talked about how she didn’t want to help a white farmer because he should be helped by “his own kind.” The contempt in her voice, in her face, and in the audience’s laughter is unmistakable. So where are all those news outlets which dutifully covered the NAACP’s attacks on the Tea Party now? The network evening news and morning news shows avoided this racist video entirely on the first day. Nevertheless, the cable news networks picked it up, and within hours, Shirley Sherrod had resigned from the Agriculture Department. Sherrod was clearly furious that her racist remarks were exposed. CNN analyst Roland Martin asserted that Sherrod had to go, because with a political appointment, remarks like this ruin the perception that Sherrod would be fair in distributing government help. Sherrod screamed right back at him that he was “clearly from a different world” than the deeply racist world she lived in. The bottom line is not only that Sherrod needed to go – but that the TV elite must stop ignoring this, and stop pretending that black racism and discriminatory attitudes do not exist. If Obama’s election was supposed to heal our race relations, then the media should put this controversy back on his desk and press him to address it.

Follow this link:
Bozell Column: The NAACP Cries Racism