Tag Archives: naacp

Broadcast Networks Ignore Racist Comments At NAACP Meeting

Despite all the attention given to last week’s National Association for the Advancement of Colored People’s resolution against the Tea Party, all three broadcast evening news programs completely ignored Monday’s revelations of racist comments made at one of the civil rights organization’s meetings in March. At 8:18 AM Monday, Big Government reported that on March 27, Shirley Sherrod, the USDA’s Rural Development director for the state of Georgia, delivered a racism-laden address at the NAACP’s 20th Annual Freedom Fund Banquet.  Here’s a taste of what the so-called news divisions at ABC, CBS, and NBC ignored Monday (video follows with partial transcript and commentary): SHIRLEY SHERROD, USDA: The first time I was faced with having to help a white farmer save his farm, he took a long time talking but he was trying to show me he was superior to me. I know what he was doing, but he had come to me for help. What he didn’t know while he was taking all that time trying to show me he was superior to me was, I was trying to decide just how much help I was going to give him. [Laughter] I was struggling with the fact that so many black people had lost their farmland, and here I was faced with having to help a white person save their land. So I didn’t give him the full force of what I could do. I did enough, so that when he, I assumed the Department of Agriculture had sent him to me, either that or the Georgia Department of Agriculture, and he needed to go back and report that I did try to help him. So I took him to a white lawyer that had attended some of training that we had provided because Chapter 12 bankruptcy had just been enacted for the family farm. So I figured if I take him to one of them, that his own kind would take care of him. As most readers are aware, this video has gone viral over the Internet. The Drudge Report posted its first piece concerning this matter at 5:28 PM. Yet, according to closed caption dumps, the three broadcast evening news programs completely ignored the story. This seems particularly hypocritical of ABC and CBS which both did detailed reports on the NAACP resolution against the Tea Party during their respective morning, evening, and Sunday political talk shows last week. For its part, NBC also focused a lot of attention on this matter on Sunday’s “Meet the Press.” I guess these news outlets are only interested in the NAACP when it’s accusing others of racism and NOT when they’re exhibiting it. As a sidebar, CNN also seems nonplussed by this development. Having done scores of reports on the NAACP-Tea Party resolution last week, the only mention of this new controversy Monday was by St. Louis Tea Party head Dana Loesch who brought it up on “Larry King Live.” As such, according to LexisNexis, the supposed most trusted name in news hasn’t fully covered this story yet, although transcripts are still coming in. I can also find no wire service reports either.  Moving forward, as this matter was serious enough for Sherrod to resign late Monday, will it get more attention in the coming days, or will NAACP-loving journalists continue to ignore this story much as they did last year’s ACORN controversy? Stay tuned.

Continue reading here:
Broadcast Networks Ignore Racist Comments At NAACP Meeting

AP Shills for NAACP Against Wishes of Black Citizens in North Carolina

The Associated Press on Monday published a news item that would more correctly be called a shameless press release on behalf of the NAACP. Writer Allen G. Breed followed the liberal group to Raleigh for a recent show of kabuki theatre. The cause? Getting the Wake County school system to continue the antiquated method of forcibly busing students to far-flung neighborhoods in pursuit of racial integration. Never mind that the minority-heavy county brought sweeping changes to the school board by giving Republicans control last year – on the very platform of ending integration. And never mind that the majority of African-Americans living there are either opposed or indifferent to school integration. The NAACP knows what is best for them. Breed predictably began with the headline ” Fear of ‘Resegregation’ Fuels Unrest in NC .” What followed was a history lesson obviously designed to drum up more fear: In the annals of desegregation, Raleigh is barely a footnote. Integration came relatively peacefully to the North Carolina capital. There was no “stand in the schoolhouse door,” no need of National Guard escorts or even a federal court order. Nearly 50 years passed – mostly uneventfully, at least until a new school board majority was elected last year on a platform supporting community schools. The result has been turmoil. When a mainstream media news item uses a delicate word like “turmoil,” you can usually take that as a sign of some unhinged liberal getting arrested. In this case, that’s exactly what happened : four activists, including the NAACP state leader, disrupted a school board meeting in front of media cameras, sat in the chairs belonging to the school officials, and waited to be pulled away by police. This apparently made them heroes in the eyes of Breed, who contacted at least one of them for a quote: “We’re not going to sit idly by while they turn the clock back on the blood, sweat and tears and wipe their feet on the sacrifices of so many that have enabled us to get to the place we are today,” says the Rev. William J. Barber II, head of the state NAACP chapter and one of the four protesters arrested for trespassing at the June 15 board meeting. If Barber is so worried about those trying to turn back the clock, his outrage is aimed in the wrong direction. The new school board was elected to do that very thing by voters in the county, many of them minorities, tired of the pointless practice of integration. Raleigh’s local News and Observer provides information from 2009 that got conveniently ignored by the AP: Winning candidates in Tuesday’s Wake County school board elections achieved their victories by tapping into widespread resentment about the schools and offering up the rallying cry “neighborhood schools.” So these proponents of localized education were swept into power by a population ready and willing to “turn back the clock” on school integration. But wait, it gets worse: Interviews with candidates and supporters showed that other factors in the near-sweep by opponents of current school board policies included:   Lackluster support for current board diversity policies by Democrats and even opposition by a significant percentage of African-Americans, as reflected in a private poll taken by a Democratic operative last month. A core of discontent not only with board policies on diversity but also with year-round schools and what opponents called an arrogant and distant board and administration. Indeed, that internal poll conducted by a Democrat campaign operative in September 2009 found that some 46 percent of black voters opposed forced busing, 14 percent had no opinion, and only 39 percent approved. In other words, the NAACP is staging protests and spouting about civil rights against the very wishes of nearly half the African-Americans in Wake County.  The AP did eventually get around to admitting that some folks wanted to repeal integration… only to reprimand them for being ignorant: With 140,000 students in 160 schools, Wake County was the largest of about 70 districts across the nation using socio-economic status to maintain diversity. The system was considered a model for those looking for a way around race-based assignment scheme rejected by the courts. “It (the Wake County system) really was a beacon, a flag around which more and more people were rallying as they saw the positive effects of this,” says sociologist Gerald Grant, a professor emeritus at Syracuse University and author of the book “Hope and Despair in the American City: Why There are No Bad Schools in Raleigh.” But some parents grew tired of sending their children off on long bus rides. Others said the policy may have brought whites and blacks together, but it wasn’t really helping blacks educationally. And there are those who say people forgot how bad the bad old days were. “For folks who were there and lived through it, there’s a real sense of a collective forgetting, a collective amnesia,” says James Leloudis, a history professor at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill who was in high school when the county system integrated. “There is a kind of tragic disremembering.” Part of the story is that Wake County is increasingly populated by people who did not grow up here and do not feel the tug or burden of that history. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, about half of Wake County’s residents were born outside North Carolina. So let’s break this down. First, courts kept striking down racially-driven school district schemes, but the geniuses in Wake County circumvented this by calling their scheme economically-driven, and this trick was heralded by liberal community organizers nationwide. Yet despite the apparent brilliance of this scheme, voters were unable to appreciate their good fortunes. Kids didn’t like being stuck on a bus for an hour, parents didn’t like PTA meetings on the other side of the city, and minority children were still not matching white peers on performance. The whole scheme was wasting money, time, fuel, and resources, all for very little gain. And then outsiders moved to Raleigh with their silly ideas of attending the school nearest home. Impressionable young black families, who don’t harbor resentment from the 1950s, are being convinced that forced busing is a stupid idea. Middle age NAACP activists are the true voice of the black community and know what is best for these naïve young blacks. This is what the Associated Press calls an informative news report about a complex issue. But it wasn’t done yet! No article on race would be complete without a random shot at tea parties: A columnist for The News & Observer in Raleigh recently called Margiotta and Tedesco “a couple of carpetbagging Northerners.” And Raleigh Mayor Charles Meeker referred to the board majority as “people who are not from the area, who don’t share our values,” and announced the formation of a group to ensure that any new student assignment plan doesn’t violate the state constitutional guarantee of a sound education. The NAACP’s Barber admits busing supporters were caught napping last fall. But with five seats – including Margiotta’s – up for grabs next year, they are determined to keep up the heat to counter what “the anti-diversity, right-wing, tea party-sympathizing, resegregationist caucus is doing in Wake County.” That’s right, folks. If you think it’s pointless to make a black student sit on a bus for an hour to attend a school miles away from friends and family, you’re a right-wing bigot. The AP did not quote one single black voter who disagreed with the NAACP. It didn’t cite any polling data on how local minorities felt, and it didn’t share any facts on how ineffective the scheme has been. How kind of the AP to care so much about the plight of poor minorities in North Carolina. Perhaps when the news wire gets done propping up liberal activist groups, it can return to reporting on actual news from that state – like say, perhaps, the ongoing investigation against former governor Mike Easley, which the AP has all but ignored in recent months. Since the local affairs of North Carolina are of so much interest to readers nationwide, it would only make sense to report on all of them. Or do nationwide readers only need to hear about the NAACP’s grasp at relevance?

See the rest here:
AP Shills for NAACP Against Wishes of Black Citizens in North Carolina

CNN’s Lemon Argues With Black Tea Party Member; Civil War ‘Modern History’?

On Thursday’s Newsroom, CNN’s Don Lemon conducted a confrontational interview of a black tea party member and disputed his assertion that the U.S. is “more divided now, racially, than any other time in modern history.” Lemon bizarrely reached back to the Confederacy to challenge his guest’s claim: “Some of the reasons for the Civil War….was racism….How can you say the country is more divided now?” The CNN anchor brought on the Reverend C. L. Bryant during a segment eight minutes into the 10 am Eastern hour to discuss the NAACP’s recent condemnation of the tea party’s “racism.” After playing a clip of Bryant from the 2009 9/12 tea party rally in Washington, DC, where the tea party leader accused the Obama administration of “building walls of racism… [and] class-ism,” Lemon first asked, “What do you think about this new resolution from the NAACP?” Bryant replied, “Well, unfortunately, those types of statements…are echoes of the left at this point in time.” Lemon then challenged the tea party leader both on his “wall of racism” accusation against the Obama White House and on his political labeling of the NAACP: “You just said that was a message that was coming from the left when you were talking about the NAACP’s message. Now…you said in the speech- you brought up racism. You said that the President was building walls of racism…. how can you say it’s just coming from the left when you just said the same thing? ” When Rev. Bryant gave his “more divided” line in response, the anchor made his Civil War reference as part of his retort: BRYANT: There are walls that have been built of racism in this country since this administration has taken oath of office, and I say that to say this- this country is more divided now, racially, than any other time in modern history , and one of the reasons for that, I feel and fear, is because it is very convenient to play the race card when you have a black president. But if anyone voted for this president because of his color, then I would say to you, that was very foolish. LEMON: Well, how you can say that this country is more divided than ever? I mean, when you think about the- you know, s ome of the reasons for the Civil War- I mean, it was racism. The country was divided, I mean, actually divided along a line. That’s what the Mason Dixon line was all about. How can you say the country is more divided now? I mean, it’s not- for lack of a better word, that black and white because there’s progress in other ways. I’m sitting here on television. You’re doing what you are doing. I don’t know if we would be doing this at some other point in time. The Civil War is “modern history”? The 150th anniversary of the beginning of the Civil War is next year in 2011. Bryant tried to clarify what he meant, but this resulted in another challenge from Lemon: BRYANT: When we take into consideration since 1965, when I received the right to vote, and where we sit now, as you very adeptly said here in 2010, and you and I both are on television, and we have the opportunities we have- but yet, we’re still talking about race in this country. There evidently is a place of division that exists in modern society, not since the Civil War, but since 1965 – LEMON: Are you saying we shouldn’t be talking about it? We shouldn’t talk about race? BRYANT: I’m sorry- say again. LEMON: Are you saying we shouldn’t talk about race? BRYANT: Of course, we must talk about race, but it must have a more intellectual tone- LEMON: Okay. BRYANT: Because African-Americans in this country are now more diverse than we ever have been before. Near the end of the interview, the CNN anchor emulated his colleague Rick Sanchez from the previous evening in bringing up the two most egregious example of racially-charged imagery from tea party rallies: LEMON: As I’m talking to you now, you’re seeing the pictures of people- you know, with monkeys; ObamaCare, with the thing- the bone through his nose and all of that, and you’ve been to these tea party rallies. Have you not seen any of these sort of things- signs and elements ? BRYANT: Out of the thousands of people that attend tea party rallies, we are very hard-pressed to police any foolishness that you may see in those types of signs, and as I said earlier, we have discouraged and do denounce anyone who brings those types of signs to any of our rallies. That’s not what we’re about- LEMON: And I think that’s what the NAACP- that’s what the resolution is about, and Ben Jealous said he’s not saying that the entire tea party or the tea party group- that they are racist. He’s saying that the tea party should denounce the racist elements. Do you agree or disagree with that? BRYANT: We have denounced those elements, and we call upon the NAACP to denounce the murderous comments that were made by [Black] Panther members last week. If, in fact, we’re going to play this particular game, then let’s make it fair and balanced. If, in fact, they call on us to denounce a certain element of the right, then they must, too, come to the table and denounce certain elements that are, evidently, on the left. LEMON: Nice talking to you, Reverend C.L. Bryant- and a civil conversation, as we should be talking about all issues. Thank you, sir.

Is All This ‘Conservatives Are Racist’ Talk Designed to Save Dems in November?

Have you noticed that you can’t swing a dead cat these days without hitting some television host claiming the Tea Party or a conservative is racist? Turn on ABC and there it is. Ditto CBS , CNN , and MSNBC . Can’t get away from it, can you? Think it’s just a coincidence, or could this be a response to President Obama’s plummeting poll numbers and the panic in the liberal media that November could be a realigning election that results in a massive Republican sweep of Congress? Before you answer, consider the following written Wednesday by Gina Loudon, the founder of Buycott Arizona: With no way to win on the issues, Democrats would need some way to energize their base. So in 2010, they began playing the race card as hard as they could. In a very rare move, the president of the United States rushed out to tell the world that he had a racist state that had gone rogue and needed to be punished. Adding to the narrative, Democratic congressional leaders invited a foreign leader to excoriate millions of Americans from the floor of Congress…While assailing white voters in Arizona, the Obama administration got caught in an Orwellian scenario that makes it appear the policy of this Chicago machine administration is that some people really are “more equal” than others.   On Tuesday, the Los Angeles Times reported : Democratic strategists looking to stave off major losses in the upcoming midterm election have devised a precise and targeted role for President Obama: recapturing the enthusiasm he generated as a fresh-faced candidate vying to become the nation’s first black president.  This seems crucial for Democrat success, as according to a recent survey by the Pew Research Center, Republicans are far more energized: Fully 56% of Republican voters say they are more enthusiastic about voting this year than in previous elections – the highest percentage of GOP voters expressing increased enthusiasm about voting in midterms dating back to 1994. While enthusiasm among Democratic voters overall is on par with levels in 2006, fewer liberal Democrats say they are more enthusiastic about voting than did so four years ago (52% then, 37% today). The Republican Party now holds about the same advantage in enthusiasm among its party’s voters that the Democratic Party held in June 2006 and the GOP had late in the 1994 campaign. Moreover, more Republicans than Democrats are now paying close attention to election news (64% vs. 50%). Coincidentally as the Times noted, the President is changing his approach:  More and more, Obama is taking on a partisan tone. He is weaving a story line peopled with villains and heroes, fools and leaders. In a speech Thursday in Las Vegas, he mocked Sen. Harry Reid’s election opponent, Republican Sharron Angle, saying she “favors an approach that’s even more extreme than the Republicans we got in Washington. That’s saying something.”  It sure is saying something: Obama and Company, realizing November looks like a disaster, are beginning to demonize the opposition. And, as midterm elections are often about turnout, the key right now for the Left is to figure out a way to energize those that helped Obama get elected in the first place. The solution: play the race card. Nothing gets the ire up in liberals more than racism.  After all, you might still be unemployed, and this administration may not have brought about all the Hope and Change they campaigned on, but Republicans are all racists. This includes many of their elected officials, their surrogates at Fox News, the radio personalities they love like Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck, and, of course, those awful Teabaggers. The NAACP just put that red letter on THEIR backs, don’t you know? With the strategy in place, all that’s needed is a compliant media stoking the fire of discontent. Just try swinging a dead cat without hitting someone that fits THAT bill. 

Read more:
Is All This ‘Conservatives Are Racist’ Talk Designed to Save Dems in November?

Keith Olbermann Thinks NAACP Resolution Against Tea Party ‘Was Kind of Mild’

Keith Olbermann on Wednesday said the recently adopted resolution by the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People condemning alleged racism within the Tea Party “was kind of mild.” Speaking with NAACP President Ben Jealous on MSNBC’s “Countdown,” Olbermann asked, “Do you think that what you passed was actually kind of moderate?” With a straight face, Olbermann continued, “Because it struck me that, that one of the points that you emphasized was that the Tea Party is, is not a racist movement, but is merely tolerating racism and bigotry by its, by its members.” Still with a straight face, “I thought that was kind of mild” (video follows with commentary): KEITH OLBERMANN: Do you, do you think that what you passed was actually kind of moderate? Because it struck me that, that one of the points that you emphasized was that the Tea Party is, is not a racist movement, but is merely tolerating racism and bigotry by its, by its members. I thought that was kind of mild.  Kind of mild? Well, although the NAACP isn’t actually going to release a full text of the resolution until October, this is the press release from the organization: NAACP DELEGATES UNANIMOUSLY PASS TEA PARTY AMENDMENT NATION’S OLDEST AND LARGEST CIVIL RIGHTS GROUPS ASK TEA PARTY TO REPUDIATE RACIST FACTIONS (KANSAS CITY, MO) – Over 2,000 NAACP delegates today unanimously passed a resolution-as amended-called “The Tea Party Movement,” asking for the repudiation of racist Tea Party leaders. The resolution condemns the bigoted elements within the Tea Party and asks for them to be repudiated. The NAACP delegates presented this resolution for debate and passage after a year of vitriolic Tea Party demonstrations during which participants used racial slurs and images. In March, members of the Congressional Black Caucus were accosted by Tea Party demonstrators and called racial epithets. Civil rights icon John Lewis was spit on, while Congressman Emanuel Cleaver was called the “N” word and openly gay Congressman Barney Frank was called an ugly anti-gay slur. “We take no issue with the Tea Party movement. We believe in freedom of assembly and people raising their voices in a democracy. What we take issue with is the Tea Party’s continued tolerance for bigotry and bigoted statements. The time has come for them to accept the responsibility that comes with influence and make clear there is no place for racism & anti-Semitism, homophobia and other forms of bigotry in their movement,” stated NAACP President and CEO Benjamin Todd Jealous. “Last night after my speech, I was approached by an African American member of the NAACP and the Tea Party. He thanked me for speaking out because he has begun to feel uncomfortable in the Tea Party and wants to ensure there will always be space for him in both organizations. I assured him there will always be a place for him in the NAACP. Dick Armey and the leadership of the Tea Party need to do the same.” The resolution was amended during the debate to specifically ask the Tea Party itself to repudiate the racist elements and activities of the Tea Party. It comes on the heels of NAACP President and CEO Benjamin Todd Jealous’ announcement of the “One Nation, Working Together” Movement culminating with a national march on Washington on 10-2-10. The resolution will now go to the NAACP National Board of Directors for a full vote when they meet in October 2010 in Baltimore, MD. A formal copy of the resolution will be released at that time. Founded in 1909, the NAACP is the nation’s oldest and largest civil rights organization. Its members throughout the United States and the world are the premier advocates for civil rights in their communities, conducting voter mobilization and monitoring equal opportunity in the public and private sectors. For the record, that’s what a shill like Olbermann believes is mild. Any questions? 

Visit link:
Keith Olbermann Thinks NAACP Resolution Against Tea Party ‘Was Kind of Mild’

CBS Uses Al Sharpton to Boost NAACP’s Accusation Tea Party is ‘Tolerating Bigotry’

A night after ABC’s World News elevated the NAACP’s allegation that the “Tea Party movement is a threat to the pursuit of human rights, justice and equality for all,” the CBS Evening News pitched in to advance the charge from the unlabeled liberal group. Over “BIGOTRY ALLEGATIONS” on screen beneath a Tea Party sign, from New Orleans Katie Couric teased at the top of her Wednesday newscast: “The NAACP accuses the Tea Party movement of tolerating bigotry.” Anchoring from New York, Harry Smith announced “the Tea Party movement has come under fire from the NAACP. The accusation: the party tolerates racism in its ranks.” John Dickerson related the charge the “Tea Party tolerates racists, says the NAACP, and these signs allegedly made by Tea Party supporters, are proof.” The two signs shown, “Obama’s Plan: White Slavery” and “Obama, What you talkin about Willis! Spend my money?”   Explaining how the NAACP’s resolution calls “on Tea Party leaders to ‘repudiate those in their ranks who use racist language in their signs and speeches,’” Dickerson featured expert comment from race-hustler Al Sharpton who insisted the Tea Party mission “is to reverse what civil rights did.” Following a clip of FreedomWorks’ Matt Kibbe asserting they do not tolerate racism, Dickerson countered with how “sometimes it’s the community’s leaders who go too far. The Iowa Tea Party purchased a billboard in downtown Mason City comparing Barack Obama to Hitler and Vladimir Lenin.” Such a billboard may be stupid or counter-productive, but how is it racist? Indeed, displaying an image of Hitler and George W. Bush, Dickerson acknowledged “partisans comparing a President to Hitler is not unique to the current President.” From Tuesday night: “ ABC Hypes NAACP Indictment of Tea Party as Racist, a Smear the Network Stoked. ” From the Wednesday, July 14 CBS Evening News: HARRY SMITH: Race and politics now. The Tea Party movement has come under fire from the NAACP. The accusation: the party tolerates racism in its ranks. Here’s John Dickerson. JOHN DICKERSON: The Tea Party tolerates racists, says the NAACP, and these signs allegedly made by Tea Party supporters, are proof [signs: “Obama’s Plan White Slavery” and “Obama, What you talkin about Willis! Spend my money?”]. Members of the civil rights organization passed a resolution at their annual convention calling on Tea Party leaders to “repudiate those in their ranks who use racist language in their signs and speeches.” AL SHARPTON: The Tea Party, as a political philosophy, is to reverse what civil rights did and that is saying the federal government must protect people. DICKERSON: The NAACP also claims activists shouted a racial slur at Congressman John Lewis during a health care protest last March. On her Facebook page, Sarah Palin, a supporter of the movement, called the charge “false, appalling, and a regressive and diversionary tactic.” Organizers of the anti-tax, anti-government Tea Party movement, like Matt Kibbe, say they have already made it clear they do not tolerate racism. MATT KIBBE: We will not tolerate any kind of hate in our groups and that if you see it in the community, you need to call them out. DICKERSON: But sometimes it’s the community’s leaders who go too far. The Iowa Tea Party purchased a billboard in downtown Mason City comparing Barack Obama to Hitler and Vladimir Lenin. The group has since covered it up, saying it was counterproductive. But partisans comparing a President to Hitler is not unique to the current President [Hitler and George W. Bush image]. Tea Party activists say the NAACP is making this incendiary charge for political reasons. KIBBE: They’re trying to mobilize voters in an election that looks very bad for Democrats. DICKERSON: The core supporters of both political parties are now in a battle with each other over race, one of the country’s most sensitive issues. And now an already contentious election year has gotten more so.

Read the original here:
CBS Uses Al Sharpton to Boost NAACP’s Accusation Tea Party is ‘Tolerating Bigotry’

Desperate Times Call

The only “race card” that matters, will be played in November. And it’s called a ballot.

Read the original here:
Desperate Times Call

ABC News Uses Michelle Obama’s NAACP Speech to Accuse Tea Party of Racism

ABC News on Monday used Michelle Obama’s NAACP speech to highlight a vote that organization is expected to take condemning what it believes is racism within the Tea Party. The news network prominently featured at its website a story with the headline “Michelle Obama Rouses NAACP Before Vote Condemning ‘Racist’ Elements of Tea Party.” The problem is the First Lady didn’t talk about the Tea Party at her address to the NAACP Monday. She didn’t even mention the group. NOT ONCE. She was there to talk about child obesity. Yet ABCNews.com chose to make its entire report on her speech about alleged racism in the Tea Party (photo courtesy AP, h/t NBer motherbelt): First Lady Michelle Obama brought renewed energy to the NAACP today, delivering the keynote speech at the annual convention one day before the nation’s largest civil rights group is expected to condemn what it calls racist elements in the Tea Party movement. The nation’s largest and oldest civil rights organization will vote on the resolution Tuesday during its annual convention in Kansas City, Mo. In her speech, the first lady focused on the issue of childhood obesity and her “Let’s Move” initiative, but outside of her remarks, anti-Tea Party activism has been a key focus of the gathering, which conservative leaders say is driven solely by a political agenda. Tea Party members have used “racial epithets,” have verbally abused black members of Congress and threatened them, and protestors have engaged in “explicitly racist behavior” and “displayed signs and posters intended to degrade people of color generally and President Barack Obama specifically,” according to the proposed resolution. “We’re deeply concerned about elements that are trying to move the country back, trying to reverse progress that we’ve made,” NAACP spokeswoman Leila McDowell told ABC News. “We are asking that the law-abiding members of the Tea Party repudiate those racist elements, that they recognize the historic and present racist elements that are within the Tea Party movement.” Next, the article promoted a rally being orchestrated against the movement: The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, in coordination with 170 other groups, including labor unions, is planning a protest march in Washington, D.C., Oct. 2 as the next step in building momentum against the Tea Party. The “One Nation” march is designed as an antithesis to the Tea Party, and it’s about “pulling America together and back to work,” McDowell said. “We see it as a threat to democracy. We see it as a threat to human rights. We certainly see it as a threat to civil rights,” McDowell said, adding that the resolution will likely pass when it’s voted upon Tuesday. Supporters of the Tea Party movement have frequently faced charges of racism. After listing some of the allegations of racism in the movement, and giving some print space to members that disagree with the accusations, author Huma Khan concluded: The first lady’s speech focused on childhood obesity and her “Let’s Move” initiative designed to promote healthy living and eating for children. NAACP leaders have individually taken on the Tea Party in the past, but the organization is now trying to build a bigger momentum against the Tea Party, which has emerged as a strong grassroots, albeit fragmented, force across the country. “We have to close the enthusiasm gap,” NAACP president Ben Jealous said in an interview with the Associated Press Friday. “The danger of the Tea Party is that people see them and think about periods in history when groups like them were much more powerful than they are now, and so a lot of what we spend energy doing is explaining to people what reality is, and that the reality is that the majority from 2008 still exists.” That’s correct. Her speech DID focus on child obesity. But ABC News chose to focus its report on her speech on allegations of racism within the Tea Party. Not only that, the article was prominently featured at the top of the front page of the news organization’s website Tuesday: How disgraceful! 

Original post:
ABC News Uses Michelle Obama’s NAACP Speech to Accuse Tea Party of Racism

NAACP to condemn Tea Party for racism

Tomorrow the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) is expected to pass a resolution condemning racist elements of the Tea Party movement. The nation's largest and oldest civil rights organization will vote on the resolution Tuesday during its annual convention in Kansas City, Mo. http://www.examiner.com/x-4383-Portland-Progressive-Examiner~y2010m7d12-NAACP-to… added by: unimatrix0

NAACP: Mel Gibson, ‘Out of Control Racist’

Filed under: Mel Gibson The L.A. Chapter of the NAACP just reacted to Mel Gibson using the “N” word in an explosive fight with Oksana Grigorieva … calling Mel “an out of date and out of control racist.” Leon Jenkins, President of the L.A. NAACP tells TMZ it’s unfortunate a… Read more

See the original post here:
NAACP: Mel Gibson, ‘Out of Control Racist’