Tag Archives: Obama

Steve King: Obama Has ‘Default Mechanism’ That ‘Favors The Black Person’

Rep. Steve King (R-IA) said today that President Obama “favors the black person” by default in an argument. Media Matters reports that King made the remarks this morning in an appearance on the G. Gordon Liddy radio show, during a discussion of the Obama administration's criticism of the new Arizona anti-illegal immigration law: King: When you look at this administration, I'm offended by Eric Holder and the President also, their posture. It looks like Eric Holder said that white people in America are cowards when it comes to race. And I don't know what the basis of that is but I'm not a coward when it comes to that and I'm happy to talk about these things and I think we should. But the President has demonstrated that he has a default mechanism in him that breaks down the side of race – on the side that favors the black person. added by: TimALoftis

On Hardball: Obama Too Cautious About Exerting His Power

Newsweek’s Howard Fineman, on Monday’s Hardball, pushed Barack Obama to “overdo” and “overstep” in his efforts to get BP to plug the leak and stop the oil spill in the Gulf, something Fineman claimed Obama hadn’t done yet because “he’s usefully and rightfully dangerous about power. I think he thought…George W. Bush overstepped in terms of executive power…he’s an observer by nature.” This observation from Fineman seems particularly odd, as it comes at the same time the President has pushed for a $50 billion in additional domestic spending. Fineman made the comment after the Politico’s Roger Simon insisted there’s only so much Obama can do, as he insisted: “He’s not Iron Man. He cannot dive a mile underwater and stop this by himself.” However host Chris Matthews asserted Obama could do more and he asked if the President will be “tough” and “really threaten BP” and openly wondered: “Does he know he’s a powerful man?” After Fineman responded that Obama needs to “overstep” a concerned Matthews questioned: “Even at the risk of being called a socialist again?” The following exchanges were aired on the June 14 edition of Hardball: CHRIS MATTHEWS: I guess the first question is can this president honestly claim he has command and control when it looks like BP is the boss? ROGER SIMON, POLITICO: No, he can’t. And he said in the interview that “We analyzed the problem and we had no greater ability to stop the leak than BP did, so we’re gonna let BP do it.” And he can’t control BP. MATTHEWS: Well looking down the road is BP going to be the big shot, and he’s going to be, as I call him, the Vatican observer watching them do what they do? And that’s all he can do. SIMON: All he can do is threaten them. All he can do is send the attorney general down there. All he can do is threaten to, to depress their stock price to such an extent they’ll go belly up. But that’s all he can do. He’s not Iron Man. He cannot dive a mile underwater and stop this by himself. … MATTHEWS: Howard, the question I have is what can he do? I’m looking back to history. I’m a political person, not an oil person, as we all are. Harry Truman, the coal miners wouldn’t mine coal after World War II. He, he conscripted them all. He drafted them. When Big Steel raised its prices and sort of, Kennedy felt was screwing them, basically, he said “Okay I’m sending the IRS to your house. I’m gonna see if you got any, any action with your secretaries at work.” He was unbelievable! He went after them and said, “Bob McNamara don’t buy any more steel from U.S. Steel.” I mean he was unbelievable. Will this president be that tough? Will he threaten, really threaten BP with all the actions of an Executive? HOWARD FINEMAN, NEWSWEEK: Well if he, if he does he’ll only be dragged kicking and screaming into it because that’s just Barack Obama’s nature. He’s judicious. MATTHEWS: Does he know he’s a powerful man? FINEMAN: He’s, he’s an observer. I think he’s usefully and rightfully dangerous about power. I think he thought George Bush, George W. Bush overstepped in terms of executive power. And it’s also, he’s an observer by nature. But before I continue I just want to say that Roger, whom I’ve known for decades, is the best in the business and we’re so happy to have him back. And, and he’s seen this before. He’s seen presidents who use power or don’t use power. If you don’t use it, you lose it. Barack Obama should overdo. He should overstep. MATTHEWS: Even at the risk of being called a socialist again? FINEMAN: Even at the risk of having a lawsuit filed against him. The Army should be in there. The Navy should be in there. They should- MATTHEWS: Okay you agree with Roger, you agree- FINEMAN: You know, and by the way BP is not in danger of going broke tomorrow. SIMON: Right. FINEMAN: But yet Obama is putting this whole escrow idea out there, so that BP can possibly do its dividend on June 21st.

Go here to see the original:
On Hardball: Obama Too Cautious About Exerting His Power

Bob Etheridge Attacks Student Caught on Tape (VIDEO)

North Carolina’s Democratic Rep. Bob Etheridge completely lost it when he was approached by a pair of “students”, who asked him if he “fully supports the Obama agenda” MORE http://bumpshack.com/2010/06/14/bob-etheridge-attacks-student-caught-on-tape-vid… added by: c7girl

MSNBC on Etheridge Assault: An ‘Ambush Interview,’ GOP ‘Set Up’

In the 2PM ET hour on MSNBC, anchor Tamron Hall did a news brief on Democratic Congressman Bob Etheridge assaulting two students attempting to ask him a question last week, proclaiming: “…there are some Democrats that are blasting the people allegedly behind this video….some would catagorize that as an ambush interview…” Hall played a clip of the video showing the assault and afterwards quoted an written apology from Etheridge. She described how the video “first appeared on Andrew Breitbart’s conservative blog BigGovernment.org,” remarking that he “was partly responsible for that notorious ACORN video featuring conservative James O’Keefe.” Hall made sure to also mention that “O’Keefe pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor for entering Senator Mary Landrieu’s office under false pretenses.” Hall then suspiciously noted about the Etheridge video: “One of these so-called camera men at one point reportedly identified himself as a student, so there’s discrepancy over who these individuals really are.” In the 3PM ET hour on MSNBC, anchor Chris Jansing spoke with NBC correspondent Luke Russert about the altercation and explained to viewers: “…in spite of the fact of what we see on camera and his apology, there are Democrats, right Luke, who frankly say they think that we need to look beyond what might seem obvious.” Russert replied: “…nobody knows who these, quote, ‘students’ are” and cited Democratic Party spokesman Brad Woodhouse claiming they were actually Republican Party operatives. He concluded: “So a lot of Democrats are saying wait, hold on, this was a set up. This guy was intentionally put out to do this by the Republican Party.” Russert admitted: “We obviously don’t know if that’s true or not,” but quickly added, “it’s quite interesting that we do not know who the folks that actually took this video are, this late in the process. You’d think they’d want some notoriety, especially if they are perpetuating this cause against the Obama agenda.” After noting that Etheridge’s  House seat was “fairly safe,” Russert made the obvious observation that “…at the end of the day, everyone agrees, it’s never a good idea to physically assault somebody who’s trying to videotape you, especially in the YouTube age.” Here is a transcript of Hall’s June 14 news brief: 2:37PM EST TAMRON HALL: And North Carolina Representative Bob Etheridge is apologizing for a video that is all over the internet, people are buzzing about it. The video shows him confronted by two camera men as he leaves a fundraiser. [ON-SCREEN HEADLINE: Confrontation on Camera; NC Rep. Apologizes for Confrontation Caught on Video] [VIDEO OF CONFRONTATION] HALL: So in a written statement just a short time ago, the Congressman said, quote, ‘I deeply and profoundly regret my reaction and I apologize to all involved. Throughout my many years of service to the people of North Carolina I’ve always tried to treat people from all viewpoints with respect. No matter how intrusive and partisan our politics can become. This does not justify a poor response. I have and will always work to promote a civil public discourse.’ Meanwhile, though, there are some Democrats that are blasting the people allegedly behind this video. It first appeared on Andrew Breitbart’s conservative blog BigGovernment.org. Breitbart, you might recall, was partly responsible for that notorious ACORN video featuring conservative James O’Keefe, when he dressed as a pimp. After a separate video project, O’Keefe pleaded guilty to misdemeanor for entering Senator Mary Landrieu’s office under false pretenses. One of these so-called camera men at one point reportedly identified himself as a student, so there’s discrepancy over who these individuals really are. But for the record, the Congressman has made this an official conversation by releasing this written statement of apology, at least regarding his actions. Not certainly those of the people who, some would catagorize that as an ambush interview, ambushing him. Here is a transcript of Jansing’s later exchange with Russert: 3:15PM EST CHRIS JANSING: Republicans and Democrats are getting fired up over a new viral video posted today on a right-wing website. It shows Democratic Congressman Bob Etheridge of North Carolina in a sidewalk confrontation with someone who identifies himself as a student. [VIDEO OF CONFRONTATION] JANSING: An edited version of the tape first showed up on websites run by well-known conservative Andrew Breitbart, of the ACORN tape controversy. NBC News’s Luke Russert is on Capitol Hill for us. Alright, let’s start with the Congressman himself. I know you reached out to his office, what did you hear from them? LUKE RUSSERT: Yeah, so the Congressman was ready and willing. It had become quite a problem for him politically and he issued an apology saying, quote, ‘I have seen the video posted on several blogs, I deeply and profoundly regret my reaction and I apologize to all involved. Throughout my many years of service to the people of North Carolina I have always tried to treat people from all viewpoints with respect no matter how intrusive and partisan our politics can become. This does not justify a poor response. I have and I will always work to promote a civil public discourse.’ So Congressman Etheridge realizing this has become a very bad political story for him, realizing that he had to get out and make a comment. It took a few hours. This obviously happened last week, it was just put into the public sphere now for the mass media to see. Etheridge realizing that it had been politically damaging, coming out and saying that he regretted it. And quite frankly, just admitting that he really had a bad moment here, I mean, a physical altercation on the street in D.C., Chris. JANSING: Yeah, and in spite of the fact of what we see on camera and his apology, there are Democrats, right Luke, who frankly say they think that we need to look beyond what might seem obvious. RUSSSERT: There’s a few interesting things here, one is the face of the reported student is blurred out. At this moment, nobody knows who these, quote, ‘students’ are. The Breitbart folks have said that this video was submitted to them anonymously. Brad Woodhouse, a Democratic spokesman, said this in a memo that was obtained by Politico, quote, ‘This was a Republican Party tracking operation. If it wasn’t a party tracker or an intern, why is the face blurred and why is the source hidden? You know if it had been a right-wing blog that identified themselves, they’d be booking this person on TV all day.’ So a lot of Democrats are saying wait, hold on, this was a set up. This guy was intentionally put out to do this by the Republican Party. We obviously don’t know if that’s true or not, but it’s quite interesting that we do not know who the folks that actually took this video are, this late in the process. You’d think they’d want some notoriety, especially if they are perpetuating this cause against the Obama agenda. So it’s going to be interesting to see what happens from here on out. Politically, Bob Etheridge, though, is fairly safe. He won his district with 57% of the vote back in 2008. Obama actually won his district 53% to 47% in North Carolina, in the Raleigh area. So politically, he should not lose his seat from this. However, at the end of the day, everyone agrees, it’s never a good idea to physically assault somebody who’s trying to videotape you, especially in the YouTube age. Chris. JANSING: Note to self. Thank you, Luke. RUSSERT: Yup.

Read more:
MSNBC on Etheridge Assault: An ‘Ambush Interview,’ GOP ‘Set Up’

Open Thread: When Congressmen Attack

A couple of college students with camera phones approached Rep. Bob Etheridge, D-N.C., after a fundraiser and asked him if he supports “the Obama agenda.” He did not respond well . Etheridge was obviously out of line, but did he commit a crime ?

View original post here:
Open Thread: When Congressmen Attack

Chris Matthews Tells Charlie Rose That Bill Clinton Is a Hit In ‘Culturally Conservative’ Areas

Have liberals blacked out the sex-and-perjury impeachment of Bill Clinton? MSNBC’s Chris Matthews appeared on the Charlie Rose show on PBS Thursday, and Rose asked him about how Sen. Blanche Lincoln had a “secret weapon” in her primary race in Arkansas. Matthews responded by laying it on thick about how great Bill Clinton is. Surely viewers giggled as Matthews talked about Clinton giving Lincoln “the full Bill.” Boy, that hug, that goes down in history, he had the French cuffs, looked like a million bucks, he put the full Bill around her. It was really an embrace. And you notice it was gender, because when she came out of that hug she was actually just overwhelmed physically, it was like you could see in her face, “I can`t believe the guy likes me that much and wants to help me that much.” It was great. It was very real. Matthews even claimed Clinton was a terrific asset in “culturally conservative Democratic” areas – as if being a “cultural conservative” isn’t at odds with what Bill Clinton represents. But Matthews is still channeling the more-conservative-than-Obama line from 2008, and then he broke down and said Clinton is great anywhere he goes: The big message coming out of this is, if you`re running, if you`re Joe Sestak running for the Senate this fall, you want him in western Pennsylvania, you want him in the culturally conservative Democratic areas. You want him in New Hampshire, another state where Bill Clinton is enormously popular is Pennsylvania and New Hampshire. If you`re running in Ohio, you want him there. You want him in Missouri, Kentucky — all that sort of state — you want him. In fact, you want him almost anywhere. There were some other notable tidbits sprinkled in: Carly Fiorina’s Deal with the Pro-Life Devil? “Fiorina, I don`t think can win a general election because she`s pro-life. She may have taken that position — opposition to Roe versus Wade, opposition to a woman`s right to choose an abortion. But she now has to stand by that politician in the general. I think that might a Faustian deal for her. That may be a real problem. They haven`t elected a pro-life candidate for high office since Deukmejian way back in the 1980s.” Teddy Roosevelt’s the only iconic figure on Mount Rushmore? Asked why a poll found John F. Kennedy should go on Mount Rushmore, Matthews explained: “I think it`s because his life had the arc of a hero, very much like Teddy Roosevelt. Who people think of when they think of Mount Rushmore, Teddy Roosevelt, he`s the one up there that`s really iconic.” Once again, Matthews ignores that many see JFK as the original TV-era cheating-horndog president. Crist will win, and caucus with the Democrats like Joe Lieberman . “I think Charlie is going to beat the band. He`s going to win the general anyway…Yes, he will be the senator, and I think he will organize for the Democrats.” Democrats won’t lose big in the Senate. “So they can win four or five seats as well as lose six or seven, so I think they can get away with only losing two or three seats in the Senate. In the House, I think they face — they`ll lose 40 seats is tough. I think they`re going to be pretty good — Rahm Emanuel will be pretty good – – they will be putting in the sealers. They will be holding off what they can.” Sarah Palin is an effective demagogue. Matthews previewed his “Rise of the Right” documentary by repeating the lines about how the tea-party movement is anti-government: “Sarah Palin is the queen of this group, the leader of this group. She represents the ability — if you listen to her, she`s very attractive and comes off in a traditional way as sort of an attractive woman from the west. “But if you listen to her, her agitation is brilliant. She gets people mad at their government, she gets people mad at them, the Obama crowd. She uses sarcasm, that demagogic language , which is very effective. If you listen to her rallies those people are angrier when she’s done. She’s very good at it and very smart at how to lead that crowd.”

Go here to see the original:
Chris Matthews Tells Charlie Rose That Bill Clinton Is a Hit In ‘Culturally Conservative’ Areas

U.S. Identifies Vast Riches of Minerals in Afghanistan

The United States has discovered nearly $1 trillion in untapped mineral deposits in Afghanistan, far beyond any previously known reserves and enough to fundamentally alter the Afghan economy and perhaps the Afghan war itself, according to senior American government officials. The previously unknown deposits — including huge veins of iron, copper, cobalt, gold and critical industrial metals like lithium — are so big and include so many minerals that are essential to modern industry that Afghanistan could eventually be transformed into one of the most important mining centers in the world, the United States officials believe. An internal Pentagon memo, for example, states that Afghanistan could become the “Saudi Arabia of lithium,” a key raw material in the manufacture of batteries for laptops and BlackBerrys. The vast scale of Afghanistan’s mineral wealth was discovered by a small team of Pentagon officials and American geologists. The Afghan government and President Hamid Karzai were recently briefed, American officials said. While it could take many years to develop a mining industry, the potential is so great that officials and executives in the industry believe it could attract heavy investment even before mines are profitable, providing the possibility of jobs that could distract from generations of war. “There is stunning potential here,” Gen. David H. Petraeus, commander of the United States Central Command, said in an interview on Saturday. “There are a lot of ifs, of course, but I think potentially it is hugely significant.” The value of the newly discovered mineral deposits dwarfs the size of Afghanistan’s existing war-bedraggled economy, which is based largely on opium production and narcotics trafficking as well as aid from the United States and other industrialized countries. Afghanistan’s gross domestic product is only about $12 billion. “This will become the backbone of the Afghan economy,” said Jalil Jumriany, an adviser to the Afghan minister of mines. American and Afghan officials agreed to discuss the mineral discoveries at a difficult moment in the war in Afghanistan. The American-led offensive in Marja in southern Afghanistan has achieved only limited gains. Meanwhile, charges of corruption and favoritism continue to plague the Karzai government, and Mr. Karzai seems increasingly embittered toward the White House. So the Obama administration is hungry for some positive news to come out of Afghanistan. Yet the American officials also recognize that the mineral discoveries will almost certainly have a double-edged impact. Instead of bringing peace, the newfound mineral wealth could lead the Taliban to battle even more fiercely to regain control of the country. The corruption that is already rampant in the Karzai government could also be amplified by the new wealth, particularly if a handful of well-connected oligarchs, some with personal ties to the president, gain control of the resources. Just last year, Afghanistan’s minister of mines was accused by American officials of accepting a $30 million bribe to award China the rights to develop its copper mine. The minister has since been replaced. Endless fights could erupt between the central government in Kabul and provincial and tribal leaders in mineral-rich districts. Afghanistan has a national mining law, written with the help of advisers from the World Bank, but it has never faced a serious challenge. “No one has tested that law; no one knows how it will stand up in a fight between the central government and the provinces,” observed Paul A. Brinkley, deputy undersecretary of defense for business and leader of the Pentagon team that discovered the deposits. At the same time, American officials fear resource-hungry China will try to dominate the development of Afghanistan’s mineral wealth, which could upset the United States, given its heavy investment in the region. After winning the bid for its Aynak copper mine in Logar Province, China clearly wants more, American officials said. Another complication is that because Afghanistan has never had much heavy industry before, it has little or no history of environmental protection either. “The big question is, can this be developed in a responsible way, in a way that is environmentally and socially responsible?” Mr. Brinkley said. “No one knows how this will work.” With virtually no mining industry or infrastructure in place today, it will take decades for Afghanistan to exploit its mineral wealth fully. “This is a country that has no mining culture,” said Jack Medlin, a geologist in the United States Geological Survey’s international affairs program. “They’ve had some small artisanal mines, but now there could be some very, very large mines that will require more than just a gold pan.” [More to read in the link] added by: UrbanGypsy

The Crime of Our Time

Danny Schechter’s new movie, “Plunder: The Crime of Our Time,” tells the story of the economic collapse as “a crime narrative as opposed to a mistakes narrative.” Truthdig_Schechter_plunder.mp3

http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TruthdigPodcast/~5/Mn8AIWIjaK4/Truthdig_Schechter_plunder.mp3

Read the original post:
The Crime of Our Time

Jonathan Alter: Health Care Puts Obama in FDR’s League

Newsweek senior editor and columnist Jonathan Alter talks about his new book, “The Promise: President Obama, Year One,” and why “Just by getting health care through … [Barack Obama is] now standing alone with Franklin Roosevelt and Lyndon Johnson in terms of domestic achievement.” Truthdig_JonathanAlter_obama.mp3

http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TruthdigPodcast/~5/OWjccxK09sk/Truthdig_JonathanAlter_obama.mp3

Read the original post:
Jonathan Alter: Health Care Puts Obama in FDR’s League

Obama Wants $50 Billion For Teachers, Cops and Firemen

With a relative drop in the bailout bucket, the president thinks he can save 300,000 teachers who would otherwise be kept by economic calamity from annoying America’s children. The money would go to state and local governments struggling to make ends meet. Christian Science Monitor: Mr. Obama has intimated in the past that the federal government’s job of propping up the economy was not yet done. Last week, he sent a letter to Congress supporting efforts to pass two separate measures totaling as much as $50 billion in aid for states and cities. With states still facing large budget shortfalls, Obama wants to minimize the potential loss of teachers, law-enforcement officers, and firefighters. He estimates that as many as 300,000 teachers could be laid off. In this way, the money would largely pick up with the $787 billion federal stimulus bill left off. Read more Related Entries June 13, 2010 Obama Will Demand a BP Escrow Fund for Victims June 12, 2010 Turning the Crisis Corner

Original post:
Obama Wants $50 Billion For Teachers, Cops and Firemen