Tag Archives: palin

Mark Ballas on Bristol Palin: What, Me Worry?

Filed under: Bristol Palin , Mark Ballas , Dancing with the Stars Some of Mark Ballas ‘ comrades on ” Dancing with the Stars ” tell TMZ … Marky Mark has been grousing that his partner, Bristol Palin , has been missing so many practices that his performance with her could be downright embarrassing. Our sources tell us… Read more

Go here to read the rest:
Mark Ballas on Bristol Palin: What, Me Worry?

WaPo’s Marcus: Palin Is Homophobic for Calling Reporters Limp and Impotent

The lengths liberals will go to trash Sarah Palin knows no bounds. On Friday, the Washington Post’s Ruth Marcus actually accused the former Alaska governor of being homophobic for calling reporters “limp” and “impotent.” As NewsBusters reported Thursday, Palin, while on Sean Hannity’s radio program the day before, bashed “impotent, limp and gutless reporters [that] take anonymous sources and cite them as being factual references.” From this, Marcus divined the following utter nonsense : The Vanity Fair writer, Michael Joseph Gross, is gay, which makes matters worse — conjuring the stereotype of “limp-wristed.” But whatever the sexual orientation of the offending reporter, Palin should not have been questioning his manhood. There are sexist aspects to the commentary about Palin, as with other female politicians. Sometimes sexism is imagined or overplayed; sometimes it is real and deserves to be called out. A new campaign, Name It, Change It, has been launched to expose such episodes. Fine, but women politicians have to keep to the high road if they don’t want men making fun of their high heels. Impotent and limp? No male politician accused a female reporter of being hormonal or frigid. To begin with, Palin never mentioned Vanity Fair or Gross’s name, nor did Hannity. In fact, their discussion about the media was precipitated by the former Alaska governor saying how poorly written a recent CQ Politics piece about her was. As such, it’s a stretch on Marcus’s part to claim Palin was specifically talking about Gross. Beyond this, how would Palin know Gross was gay? Until I read Marcus’s piece, I didn’t know that.  Did Marcus herself learn this from the gay and lesbian publication Advocate.com which published the following editorial Thursday: Is Sarah Palin using code words to slam gay journalist Michael Joseph Gross, a frequent Advocate contributor who wrote the much-buzzed-about profile of the former vice presidential nominee in this month’s Vanity Fair? Palin didn’t mention Gross by name while talking Thursday on Sean Hannity’s WABC radio show, but she seemed to be referring to the article – and pointedly used emasculating words that have long been used as euphemisms for homosexuality – when she called reporters who publish “rumors” about her “impotent,” “limp,” and “gutless.” So, a gay and lesbian publication made this accusation Thursday, and Marcus decided to echo it at the Washington Post the following day. This now officially puts Marcus in the same category as MSNBC’s Ed Schultz who last month said Palin was sexist for suggesting Barack Obama lacked cojones when it comes to illegal immigration. Attagirl, Ruth! That’ll help you get that Pulitzer Prize you’ve always wanted.

Go here to see the original:
WaPo’s Marcus: Palin Is Homophobic for Calling Reporters Limp and Impotent

Is Sarah Palin the ‘New McCarthy’?

Trumka Says Palin Is ‘New McCarthy’ – Her Language Foments Violence http://www.theblaze.com/stories/video-trumka-says-palin-is-new-mccarthy-her-lang… added by: ibrake4rappers13

Vanity Fair Reporter Admits Error In Sarah Palin Hit Piece

For almost two years, Sarah Palin has been complaining about media members making things up about her. On Friday, one finally admitted it. As NewsBusters reported Wednesday, Vanity Fair’s October issue has a hit piece on its cover about the former Alaska governor that Palin-hating press members have been predictably fawning and gushing over. Now, the Associated Press is reporting that the author, Michael Joseph Gross, has admitted making a mistake in his piece: Reporter Michael Joseph Gross describes Palin’s youngest son, Trig, being pushed in a stroller by his older sister, Piper, before a rally in May in the Kansas City suburb of Independence. “When the girl, Piper Palin, turns around, she sees her parents thronged by admirers, and the crowd rolling toward her and the baby, her brother Trig, born with Down syndrome in 2008,” according to the article. “Sarah Palin and her husband, Todd, bend down and give a moment to the children; a woman, perhaps a nanny, whisks the boy away; and Todd hands Sarah her speech and walks her to the stage.” Later in his piece, Gross described Piper joining Sarah on stage to “allow Palin to make a public display of maternal affection.”  Unfortunately, as Politico’s Ben Smith reported Thursday, that was a different Down syndrome baby: Trig wasn’t at the event, according to its organizer, Karladine Graves, a 61-year-old Kansas City physician, who, in 2009, founded one of the wave of new local conservative groups, this one called Preserving American Liberty. The “woman, perhaps a nanny,” was the boy’s mother, St. Louis talk radio host Gina Loudon, according to Graves. But it gets worse according to the AP: The mother of that child, conservative activist Gina Loudon, told the St. Louis Post-Dispatch that she told Gross during the rally that the child in the stroller was her son, not Palin’s. She said she tried to make it clear because the two children look a lot alike. “I told him that. And he ignored it,” Loudon said. “It’s not even like he didn’t fact check – he just ignored facts.” Now, Gross has admitted it: Gross said in a written statement sent to The Associated Press that he was mistaken. “Trig was with his mother the next day in Wichita (Kan.), but the child in Independence was someone else, and I regret the error,” he said. He regrets the error? No he doesn’t. He regrets getting caught, for as Smith wrote Thursday, this has been a modus operandi for dishonest media members like Gross for two years: [T]he Vanity Fair piece on Sarah Palin is so emblematic of much that’s wrong about the way she’s covered that it’s worth returning to, and I’ve learned that the its long wind-up is based on fundamental confusion about which of Palin’s children was at an event in Kansas City. Palin almost never talks to neutral media outlets, leaving her – as critics accurately note – subject to none of the questions, challenges  and reality checks that the political press puts regularly to almost every other national political figure. She takes a lot of heat for this, deservedly. But with the hunger for information about her, and the traffic she drives, the press sometimes compensates by printing such thinly sourced, badly reported nonsense about her that it’s hard to imagine it making it into a serious magazine like Vanity Fair if it concerned any other figure. Of course, this might not happen if she spoke to reporters, but that’s no excuse. Yeah it is, Ben, for what’s the point of talking to the press if they’re going to just make stuff up? Of course, this is the kind of yellow journalism by “impotent, limp, gutless reporters” Palin ridiculed while chatting with Sean Hannity Wednesday, and is why it’s difficult to believe any of the nonsense about her in the media. Vanity Fair should be so proud of itself. 

See more here:
Vanity Fair Reporter Admits Error In Sarah Palin Hit Piece

Levi — Bristol Never Danced with Me!

Filed under: Bristol Palin , Levi Johnston Levi Johnston says he’s totally shocked that

ABC Nightline Anchor Agrees With Newsweek Columnist: Sarah Palin Owes Her Career to Ruth Bader Ginsburg

Twitter can be a very revealing place to learn about “objective” journalists. ABC Nightline anchor Terry Moran tweeted on Tuesday there was a “Great piece” by Newsweek columnist Dahlia Lithwick on the liberal site Slate.com suggesting that Sarah Palin owed her every success to the real Mama Grizzly, leftist Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who never found an abortion she wouldn’t defend. Palin was a fraud next to the real feminist. But Moran (and Lithwick) blamed their fellow liberals for not supporting a left-wing Palin figure:  In a thoughtful piece in the New York Times , Anna Holmes and Rebecca Traister argued that Democrats have given up on full-throated feminism, and in doing so have ceded the field to Palin and her clan of Grizzlies. Holmes and Traister point out the irony that it was progressives who launched Palin’s meteoric rise: “As a teen, she played basketball thanks to Title IX; as an adult, she enjoyed a professional life made possible by the involvement of her load-bearing husband Todd, entering Alaska’s governor’s mansion at 42 with four children in tow and giving birth to a fifth while there.” Democrats gave on on “full-throated feminism” as Obama plopped two hard-core female abortion advocates to the Supreme Court? That’s just odd. Lithwick didn’t include this paragraph in her article, which was the central thought of the Holmes/Traister piece:  Since the 2008 election, progressive leaders have done little to address the obvious national appetite for female leadership. And despite (or because of) their continuing obsession with Ms. Palin, they have done nothing to stop an anti-choice, pro-abstinence, socialist-bashing Tea Party enthusiast from becoming the 21st century symbol of American women in politics. ABC’s Terry Moran no doubt agrees with that sentiment, too. But Lithwick only built on the notion that Palin owes Justice Ginsburg in a major way:  To which I would just add that Palin and the Mama Grizzlies also owe a debt of thanks directly to Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who almost single-handedly convinced the courts and legislatures to do away with gender classifications in matters ranging from a woman’s right to be executor of her son’s estate ( Reed v. Reed , 1970), to a female Air Force lieutenant’s right to secure housing allowances and medical benefits for her husband ( Frontiero v. Richardson , 1973), and the right of Oklahoma’s “thirsty boys” (her words) to buy beer at the Honk n’ Holler at the same age as young women ( Craig v. Boren , 1976). It was in Craig v. Boren that Ginsburg secured the court’s agreement that—in her words—the “familiar stereotype: the active boy, aggressive and assertive; the passive girl, docile and submissive” was “not fit to be written into law.” The seed for Sarah Palin was sown. And whether Palin wants women to be allowed to buy beer at 18, or 21, or not at all, the fact that the legal system doesn’t care whether you’re a woman or a man anymore changed her life. You can draw a straight line between Ginsburg’s fight against these seemingly harmless gender classifications that were rooted in seemingly harmless gender stereotypes and the Mama Grizzlies who roam our political landscape today. Those who like to believe they have picked themselves up by the bootstraps sometimes forget that they wouldn’t even have boots were it not for the women who came before. Listening to Palin, it’s almost impossible to believe that, as recently as 50 years ago, a woman at Harvard Law School could be asked by Dean Erwin Griswold to justify taking a spot that belonged to a man. In Ginsburg’s lifetime, a woman could be denied a clerkship with Felix Frankfurter just because she was a woman. Only a few decades ago, Ginsburg had to hide her second pregnancy for fear of losing tenure. I don’t have an easy answer to the question of whether real feminists are about prominent lipsticky displays of ” girl-power ,” but I do know that Ginsburg’s lifetime dedication to achieving quiet, dignified equality made such displays possible…. This is what Terry Moran calls the “hard work of real feminism,” but ignored the fringier parts of Ginsburg’s resume , like her advocacy in the 1970s for the sex-integration of the Boy Scouts and Girl Scouts, and of prisons, and of Mother’s Day and Father’s Day. Or her belief in a constitutional right to prostitution. Or her recent declaration to The New York Times that Medicaid should have paid for abortions since “there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of.” Lithwick concluded her ABC-endorsed “great piece” with a love pat:  Ruth Bader Ginsburg doesn’t growl and doesn’t issue threats, and she rarely eats small forest dwellers. But she is still the mother of all grizzlies to me. [Ginsburg caricature by Kerry Waghorn]

Follow this link:
ABC Nightline Anchor Agrees With Newsweek Columnist: Sarah Palin Owes Her Career to Ruth Bader Ginsburg

Levi Johnston — Takes Back Apology to Palin Fam

Filed under: Sarah Palin , Levi Johnston , Bristol Palin , Politix , TV , Celebrity Feuds Levi Johnston claims the apology he issued to Sarah Palin and her family back in July was total BS … and he only begged for Sarah’s forgiveness to make Bristol happy. Levi appeared on the CBS ” Early Show ” this morning — where the dude who once… Read more

Read this article:
Levi Johnston — Takes Back Apology to Palin Fam

Levi Johnston — Now Accepting Donations

Filed under: Levi Johnston , Sarah Palin , Bristol Palin , Politix Levi Johnston has been granted the right to beg you for a campaign donation … because he’s filed his official “letter of intent” to run for “state or municipal office” in Alaska in the 2011 elections. In the documents, filed on Friday with the Alaska… Read more

Read the rest here:
Levi Johnston — Now Accepting Donations

Happy Birthday, Madonna!

Madonna Louise Ciccone, better known by just her first name, is one of the most successful recording artists in music history. She needs no introduction from us. It’s hard to believe that the star’s debut album came out 1983, setting the stage for her immense popularity and pushing of boundaries across the music spectrum. She helped popularize MTV and transform pop with hits like “Like a Virgin,” “Papa Don’t Preach,” “Like a Prayer,” “Vogue,” Hung Up,” “4 Minutes” and many others. Commercially and critically acclaimed, Madonna’s diverse musical offerings have won respect and millions of fans over the years, not to mention much controversy. Madonna turns 52 today. Give it up for the Material Girl! More recently, her music was immortalized on Fox’s Glee , and her relationships with Alex Rodriguez and Jesus Luz have kept her in the celebrity gossip spotlight. She’s also a mother to Lourdes, Rocco, David and Mercy. Here’s hoping she keeps on rocking for years to come. Click to enlarge the gallery of Madonna pictures we’ve put together below and wish her a happy birthday!

Read the original:
Happy Birthday, Madonna!

Henry Rollins Knows What’s Wrong with American Education – and Guess Who’s to Blame

On the heels of a new College Board report that the United States is struggling to compete with other countries when it comes to college completion rates, Vanity Fair’s resident straight talker, Henry Rollins, has figured out the problem.  The education system isn’t struggling because of possible factors contained within the report, such as: Inadequate funding of preschool programs Poor college counseling programs for middle and high school aged children High school dropout rates A lack of international standardization for curriculum Skyrocketing costs of education No, Henry has stumbled onto the real, super secret reason why students are failing to finish their college work:  Sarah Palin and George Bush .  To be accurate, it’s not so much the direct fault of Palin and Bush – rather, it is those of you who support them, their stupid comments, and their intellectually uninterested ways.  Their fans see them as real people and because of that, they feel comfort in an unchallenging environment. Rollins explains why ‘America doesn’t seem to value a college education the way it used to’: “…in America the educated person is often seen as some sissified, fragile know-it-all who looks down at the common man. Every time Sarah Palin says something stupid, she gets more fans. To them, she is “real.” It’s the same reason why so many Americans loved George Bush. They saw themselves in this intellectually uninterested man and found comfort in such an unchallenging environment.” Worse, Rollins somehow manages to immediately transition into a Hitler reference.  In explaining that Americans seem to express disdain for the educated person (via leaders such as Palin and Bush), he then goes on to say: “What leaders had contempt for educated people?  Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot, to name a few.” And “Funny how the very idea of increased education opportunities threatens some Americans.  They will tell you that education is stupid.” And “America’s abysmal report card, appalling treatment of teachers, and hostile contempt for its young people should be our national shame, the sub-literate albatross swinging from our collective neck.  America No. 1?  Not even close.” Now, before you go accusing Mr. Rollins of being a liar, a liar, a liar, a liar , it is important to note that Henry speaks from experience, having come from a very thorough, college-educated background himself.  However, in this case anyway, it is apparent that Palin and Bush weren’t the cause of at least one American quitting college.   Rollins dropped out of American University following a very brief stint (one semester) in the late ‘70’s.  Citing reasons such as boredom, and the fact that his classmates would rather study beer and bongs than read books, Rollins instead pursued his musical career. Seems he is partially correct.  There are some individuals out there who look at college experience with contempt, threatened by education because it is, in a word, stupid.  By way of contrast, Sarah Palin earned a Bachelor’s degree in journalism from the University of Idaho.  Oh, and that intellectually uninterested guy we mentioned earlier?  He earned a history degree from Yale University in 1968, and is the only President to have ever earned a Masters Degree in Business Administration from Harvard Business School. Make no mistake, Henry Rollins is an incredibly intelligent, well-read, real-world educated person, and Vanity Fair is wise in giving him an outlet.  But traipsing into the world of liberal lunacy (Palin and Bush Derangement Syndrome) clouds any argument one can make.  In this case, Rollins opines that education suffers because of uneducated people who have a better education than himself.  The result is intellectually dishonest and hypocritical. In other words, he is the Wrong Man for this debate. – Rusty welcomes comments/feedback at Weiss.Rusty@gmail.com .

See the rest here:
Henry Rollins Knows What’s Wrong with American Education – and Guess Who’s to Blame