Tag Archives: People

Sixteen Things That it Took Me 50 Years to Learn

1. You will never find anybody who can give you a clear and compelling reason why we observe day-light-savings time. 2. You should never say anything to a woman that even remotely suggests you think she’s pregnant unless you can see an actual baby emerging from her at that moment. 3. The most powerful force in the universe is gossip. 4. The one thing that unites all human beings, regardless of age, gender, religion, economic status or ethnic background, is that, deep down inside we ALL believe that we are above-average drivers. 5. There comes a time when you should stop expecting other people to make a big deal about your birthday. That time is age 111. 7. There is a very fine line between “hobby” and “mental illness.” 8. People who want to share their religious views with you almost never want you to share yours with them. 9. If you had to identify, in one word, the reason why the human race has not achieved, and never will achieve, its full potential, that word would be “meetings.” 10. The main accomplishment of almost all organized protests is to annoy people who are not in them. 11. If there really is a God who created the entire universe with all of its glories, and He decides to deliver a message to humanity, He will NOT use, as His messenger, a person on cable TV with a bad hairstyle. 12. You should not confuse your career with your life. 13. A person who is nice to you, but rude to the waiter, is not a nice person. 14. No matter what happens, somebody will find a way to take it too seriously. 15. When trouble arises and things look bad, there is always one individual who perceives a solution and is willing to take command. Very often, that individual is crazy. Your friends love you, anyway. 16. Nobody cares if you can’t dance well. Just get up and do it. Dave Barry added by: onemalefla

B.o.B. Breaks Through: A VMA Cheat Sheet

After nearly quitting the music business last year, the eclectic MC and songwriter from Atlanta shot to the top of the pop charts. By Jayson Rodriguez B.o.B Photo: ABC B.o.B. isn’t like most pop stars. He really isn’t like most rap stars, either. But the guitar-strumming MC’s mix of melodic rhymes and earnest songwriting has him up for a few Moonmen at the 2010 MTV Video Music Awards , which air live on September 12 at 9 p.m. Here’s how he did it. The lanky lyricist grew up on a diet of Michael Jackson and Tina Turner, but when he got older his tastes widened to include everything from the Beatles to Bj

Eminem’s Return Thrills Detroit Fans

Surprise guests and solid performances cap Shady’s homecoming show at Comerica Park. By Rahman Dukes Eminem performs in Detroit on Thursday Photo: Kevin Mazur/ WireImage Thursday (September 2) was a night that the people of Detroit will never forget. Eminem, who hadn’t performed in his hometown for years, co-headlined a show at Comerica Park with Jay-Z . And if you ask Em’s fans, it was more than worth the wait.

Link:
Eminem’s Return Thrills Detroit Fans

Eminem, Jay-Z Joined By Dr. Dre, Drake At Historic Detroit Concert

D12, 50 Cent and G-Unit, Young Jeezy also hit Comerica Park stage as Em, Hov unleash flurry of hits on first stop of Home and Home Tour. By Shaheem Reid Eminem and Jay-Z (file) Photo: Kristian Dowling/ Getty Images Detroit hasn’t screamed this loud at a baseball park since Kirk Gibson was hitting home runs in the 1984 World Series. Hip-hop history was made as Jay-Z and Eminem co-headlined the Motor City’s Comerica Park (home of the D-Town Tigers for the past decade) on Thursday night (September 2), the first of two shows on consecutive nights. While Jay’s high-grossing touring schedule helped him to top this year’s Forbes’ “Hip-Hop Cash King” list , Eminem took a much-needed sabbatical to deal with a myriad of personal issues. Now beyond his darkest hour, Em had one of his brightest moments ever onstage. Not only did he gift his hometown with a seemingly endless string of hits, he pulled off some major surprises. After D12, 50 Cent and the G-Unit — acts that fans likely expected — came out for performances with Em, Slim Shady pulled off a shocker. Dr. Dre came out, first stunning the people then delighting them with smashes. After his name appeared on the Comerica big screen, the man heralded by many as the greatest producer of his time came out to the opening notes of his world-famous “Next Episode.” Then the familiar first keys of “Still Dre” were played. “Haters say Dre fell off,” the Doc rapped. “How n—a? My last album was The Chronic. ” After that, the Shady/Aftermath duo took it back to Dre’s Chronic days with “Nuthin’ But a ‘G’ Thang.” “One, two, three and to the fo,” Em rapped in Snoop’s cadence. ” ‘Cause you know we came to rip sh– up!” Dre spit later. Dr. Dre appeared to be in the best shape of his life. Wearing a T-shirt with the late Proof’s face printed on it, Dre looked strong enough to end the Undertaker’s undefeated streak at Wrestlemania. “Got dammit, Detroit. Do I love you or what?” Eminem asked his fans. “Look what I brought out for you.” Em then told Dre he wanted him to feel the love; Detox chants followed. “Deeee-tox. Deeee-tox,” they yelled from the bleachers to the bullpen. Dre just smiled and said, “I’m Comin’!” One would-be guest who couldn’t attend for obvious reasons was Lil Wayne. But Shady made sure to salute Weezy after “No Love.” And the Young Money flag did wave proudly in Detroit as Drake came out for “Forever” and gave a special nod to the Motor City. “In Detroit, faded off the brown,” Drake rapped. “Nino!!!!” the crowd responded. “I’m so honored to be here to tonight. This is history in the making. I want y’all to make some noise for the muthaf—in’ legend that is Emimem.” Em’s legend was largely built off his mastery of music and a catalog made for the kind of environment he played on Thursday: stadiums. The Detroit rapper has been making sing-along anthems throughout his career. Not just tracks you rap in the shower or in the car, but big records like “Sing for the Moment,” “Stan” and “Cleaning Out My Closet” — tracks practically begging for an audience of tens of thousands holding lighters up. Em proved he still has that rare connection with his fanbase. Grown men took off their shirts and got rock-n-roll rowdy when he rapped. “Got dammit, Detroit, I’m back,” Em said early on in the night. “Did you miss me?” It was clear that Em missed his fans as well. He was engaging, lively and energetic on this night. After the “Real Slim Shady” and “Without Me,” Em thanked his fans again. “I love you. This song is for you.” “Not Afraid” followed. After screams of “encore, encore,” Em brought out the Unit, D12 and Detroit legend Trick Trick who had earlier performed on “Lose Yourself.” Thursday’s Home and Home show kicked off with B.o.B, who came back later for “Airplanes, Pt. 2,” and set the tone with a quick set that included “Nothin’ on You.” The audience was eventually alerted that the Jiggaman was 10 minutes away from showtime. Two clocks filled two oversize screens on the enormous stage while the Beastie Boys’ “No Sleep Till Brooklyn” blared from the speakers. When the countdown hit “0,” Jay rose from beneath the stage, the lyrically intricate “Dynasty Intro” being played by his band, the Roc Boys. Then a brief snippet of “Lucifer” played before Jay went into his jaw-dropping verse from Rick Ross’ “Free Mason.” During “D.O.A. (Death of Auto-Tune),” Jay rhymed “this might need a verse from Jeezy.” On cue, the Snowman came out for the “Dey Know” remix followed by “Soul Survivor.” His mini-set ended with “Put on for My City” and “Lose My Mind.” After that though, it was the Jay hit parade — with assistance from Memphis Bleek. The Brooklyn duo rocked with a flurry of big records, including “You Don’t Know,” “99 Problems” and “(Originator 99).” During “Big Pimpin’,” Jay delivered Pimp C’s verse in the late UGK legend’s cadence. “What y’all know about them Deetroit boys?” Hov asked. A tribute to hip-hop’s fallen soldiers ensued, as the audience shouted in unison, “Prrrrrooooooooof!” “I know y’all going through a lot, but Detroit has heart and Detroit will be back,” Jay said. Hov and Slim Shady shared but a few minutes of stage time as Jay emerged for “Renegade” during Em’s set. The Home and Home Tour continues Friday night (September 3) at Comerica Park and comes to the Bronx, New York, on September 13 and 14 at Yankee Stadium. Were you at Jay and Em’s Detroit stop? Tell us what you thought of the show! Related Photos Jay-Z And Eminem: Other Megastar Concert Pairings MCs And Their Hometown Stadiums Jay-Z And Eminem: Stadium Face-Off Related Artists Eminem Jay-Z Dr. Dre

The rest is here:
Eminem, Jay-Z Joined By Dr. Dre, Drake At Historic Detroit Concert

Justin Bieber Fans Say They’ll Cast VMA Votes ‘Every Single Day’

‘Nobody stands a chance against him,’ one die-hard Belieber says of Best New Artist nominee. By Rya Backer Justin Bieber Photo: Mark Von Holden/ Getty Images Justin Bieber has had a landmark year, earning among other accolades a friendship with Kim Kardashian , a #1 album, a sold-out tour and a multitude of hits. And now, in addition to performing at the 2010 Video Music Awards on September 12, he’s also been nominated for Best New Artist for “Baby.” MTV News hit Madison Square Garden before Bieber’s sell-out gig on Tuesday and asked Bieber’s fans about his chances of winning. The Beliebers, who are famous — and at times infamous — for their rabid devotion, not surprisingly, predicted very little competition for their hero from his fellow nominees, including chart-toppers Ke$sha and Nicki Minaj. Because the Best New Artist is decided by the public, Bieber’s fans said they’ll see to it that he takes home his Moonman. “Most of the fans that he has are really big fans, so if they vote for him, they’ll vote for him every single day,” Bailey Solomons explained. Solomons, along with two friends, did not have tickets for the MSG show, but dressed up in their best Bieber garb hoping to be invited in. Another fan, Alexa Summerlin, affirmed Bailey’s sentiment, saying, “Justin has a big fanbase and the people are gonna vote for him.” “Nobody stands a chance against him, if they did, I would be so shocked,” said Taylor Carro, a fan who plans on voting before the September 12 deadline. Other fans had a simpler argument for why Bieber stands to pick up the award. “He’s amazing and everyone loves him!” Diana Rossi gushed. “All the teenagers and kids love him,” Danicka Przchowski added. Be sure to catch the Video Music Awards September 12 to see if Bieber’s fans got out the vote! The 27th annual MTV Video Music Awards will be broadcast live from the Nokia Theatre in Los Angeles on September 12 at 9 p.m. ET. Go to

To Letterman’s Irritation, Trump Denounces Ground Zero Mosque as ‘Insensitive,’ ‘Somebody Knocked Down the World Trade Center’

Earning applause from the audience inside Manhattan’s Ed Sullivan Theater for Wednesday’s Late Show, Donald Trump gave David Letterman his take on placing a new mosque near Ground Zero: “I think it’s very insensitive to build it there. I think it’s not appropriate, a I think it’s insensitive and it shouldn’t be built there.” Letterman frowned, prompting Trump to point out to the audience: “I don’t know if he agrees.” Letterman eventually asked “what about the notion” of when the “pilgrims came over…looking for religious expression? And as far as I’ve always known, that’s a fundamental building block of what makes this country great.” Trump agreed, but “it’s caused such a storm that the people doing it would make so much good will” if they moved it to a different location. When Trump repeated his point, to more applause, about how “it’s very insensitive to build it there and I think they should go someplace else,” a befuddled Letterman wondered: “Describe for me what insensitivity is manifested if it’s built there?” And Letterman fretted: “Does this suggest that we are in fact officially at war with Muslims?” To which, Trump observed: “Well, somebody knocked down the World Trade Center.” Letterman also sputtered: “I don’t believe, not having read the Koran, I don’t believe that part of that belief, that pursuit is here in your face, take a look at this, what do you think? What are you going to do?” Trump, on to promote a new season of The Apprentice on NBC, retorted: “Well, somebody’s blowing us up. Somebody’s blowing up buildings, and somebody’s doing lots of bad stuff.” The Late Show Web site has a video of a portion of the Ground Zero mosque discussion. Audio: MP3 clip From the Wednesday, September 1 Late Show with David Letterman: DAVID LETTERMAN: Now, tell me everything I need to know — everything a reasonable person should understand about the rebuilding that’s taking place at the former site of the twin towers, and the construction of, possible construction of a mosque down there. What do you know about it? What do you understand about it? And what are smart people, what should we be thinking of. DONALD TRUMP: Well, the rebuilding is going very slowly. It should have gone faster. I’ve always said what we should do is rebuild the World Trade Center exactly as it was. You know, it was never a very popular building architecturally until it went down and when it went down we all felt so terrible and all of a sudden people started loving it. I came out and said we should rebuild it in exactly the same form, but a little bit taller and a lot stronger and a lot of people loved that idea, but that’s not what they’re doing. As far as the mosque is concerned, I think it’s very insensitive to build it there. I think it’s not appropriate, a I think it’s insensitive and it shouldn’t be built there. (Applause) [pause as Letterman frowns] I don’t know if he agrees LETTERMAN: Well, I don’t know — I’m so ignorant about stuff. What about the notion — I can remember, I can’t remember but, remember when the pilgrims came over? Folks, remember when the pilgrims were here? And the puritans, and they came seeking religious freedom, and freedom from religious persecution, looking for religious expression. And as far as I’ve always known, that’s a fundamental building block of what makes this country great. TRUMP: I agree. And, you know, it’s called very simply freedom of religion. And I would agree with that 100 percent. In this case, it’s caused such a storm that the people doing it would make so much good will if they said, “hey, listen, we want to make everybody happy, including ourselves. We’re going to pick a site that’s a little further away.” Everybody would be happy and I think it would be such incredible good will. I would say if they wanted to do it from a PR standpoint it would be the greatest thing they could do. But I don’t see it happening. I see the developer, he’s pretty tough, and he wants to build it there. He’s get no money. He’s got a lot of problems. But I think the mosque is a real big issue in this city and in this country and I think it’s very insensitive to build it there and I think they should go someplace else. (Applause) LETTERMAN: Insensitive, and describe for me what insensitivity is manifested if it’s built there. TRUMP: Well, I just think there’s such ire. There’s such — I’ve never seen anything quite like it. I mean, I goy that site because I have a big building down there, 40 Wall Street, and the level of animosity and hatred and all of the things that this mosque is engendering, it’s very inappropriate. And I’m like you, I believe freedom of religion, but at the same time, sometimes you have to make a turn. It shouldn’t be forced upon them. If they did it of their own volition it would be such a popular thing for them. LETTERMAN: If they did what? TRUMP: If they moved it to a different site. LETTERMAN: The notion — does this suggest that we are in fact officially at war with Muslims? Is that what this suggests? TRUMP: Well, somebody knocked down the World Trade Center. LETTERMAN: Yes. No denying that, and they were Muslims, but they weren’t, it’s not, how do I want to express this? We’re not at — we’re at war with those people and they happen to be Muslims. We’re not at war with Muslims. (Applause) TRUMP: Well, I would say that’s right, David, I would say that’s right. And whether you like it or not, there’s a lot of people in this country that are just absolutely — you see the people who died in the World Trade Center, when you see their mothers and their fathers and their wives standing there just weeping and crying because of the mosque, I just think it would be a great thing if they would move it, if they would voluntarily say, “you know, we’re going to move this.” I think they would engender, I mean, it would be so good for them. LETTERMAN: Yes, but I don’t believe, not having read the Koran, I don’t believe that part of that belief, that pursuit is here in your face, take a look at this, what do you think? What are you going to do? TRUMP: Well, somebody’s blowing us up. I mean, somebody’s blowing up buildings, and somebody’s doing lots of bad stuff, David. And, you know, we’re at war, which as you know because you and I had this discussion two times ago when I was on the show. We should have never been in Iraq in the first place….

Read more:
To Letterman’s Irritation, Trump Denounces Ground Zero Mosque as ‘Insensitive,’ ‘Somebody Knocked Down the World Trade Center’

CBS Early Show Promotes Palin-Bashing Vanity Fair Article

On Thursday’s CBS Early Show, fill-in co-host Erica Hill interviewed Vanity Fair reporter Michael Joseph Gross about his article slamming Sarah Palin with outlandish accusations: “…we’ve watched Sarah Palin go from a small town hockey mom and the mayor to international celebrity….it certainly changed her, that’s according to a rather unflattering new article in Vanity Fair magazine. ” Talking to Gross, Hill noted how he “had a tough time…getting to people who are close to Sarah Palin,” but wondered: “…tell us about the people you did speak to who are around her….What kind of an impression did they give you of Sarah Palin?” Gross detailed some of the wild claims made by his questionable sources: “They’d tell stories about screaming fits, about throwing things….where Sarah and Todd will empty the pantry of canned goods, throwing them at each other until the front of the refrigerator looks like it’s been shot up by a shot gun.” Taken in by the story, Hill simply replied: “Wow.” Gross continued, alleging that Palin “tortured” former assistants, one of whom “had to quit the job, seek psychiatric counseling, and leave the state to escape Palin’s influence.” He asserted: “…[Palin] exacts retribution on people after they leave. They’re afraid that she’s going to get them fired from their job, try to ruin their reputations. That’s the modus operandi.” Earlier in the interview, he described Palin’s current political activity as an effort to exact “a kind of vengeance on the country for rejecting her” in the 2008 election. Hill seemed puzzled about Palin’s refusal to talk to Gross for the vicious hit piece: “These are all some pretty strong allegations. You tried to get in touch….with Sarah Palin, with her media people….Did they tell you why they wouldn’t speak with you?” Gross replied: “I tried everything. I tried sending messages through her father, through her hairdresser. I spent almost three weeks in Wasilla.” Hill wrapped up the segment by endorsing the smear: “It’s a fascinating article. It’s a fascinating read.” Prior to Hill’s interview with Gross, correspondent Nancy Cordes reported on the Vanity Fair attack: “The story portrays Palin as leading a life shrouded in secrecy, using fear to control those around her.” One accusation she highlighted: “The article gives new details about Palin’s heavily publicized campaign spending habits, saying she purchased over 400 items, including $3,000 on underwear and $20,000 on a new wardrobe for her husband, Todd.” A sound bite was featured from Politico’s Andrew Barr, who proclaimed: “…it seems like they’re [the Palins] going around, trying to, you know, bilk the RNC and others for as much money as they could get.” Cordes also noted: “Gross claims that before [Levi] Johnston issued a public apology to Palin, she met with him privately and demanded to know if he was wearing a wire.” She then touted how the Early Show provided a platform to Johnston yet again last week : “In an exclusive interview with the Early Show last Friday, Levi said he regretted making that statement [the apology].”    Here is a full transcript of the September 2 segment: 8:30AM TEASE ERICA HILL: Also ahead, we’ve watched Sarah Palin go from a small town hockey mom and the mayor to international celebrity. That kind of sudden fame can change anyone. And it certainly changed her, that’s according to a rather unflattering new article in Vanity Fair magazine. We’re going to speak with the author of that article, who followed Palin on the trail for months, spoke to dozens of people who know her. We’ll see the picture that he says emerged. 8:40AM SEGMENT ERICA HILL: For two years now, Sarah Palin has been in the national spotlight. Making a political impact that’s felt from Washington to Hollywood and, of course, in Alaska. Her life has changed and so has her family’s. And as CBS News correspondent Nancy Cordes tells us, those changes, according to a new report, aren’t always flattering. SARAH PALIN: We must restore America- [ON-SCREEN HEADLINE: Inside Palin’s World; New Revelations About Fmr. Alaska Governor] NANCY CORDES: She’s the Republican Party’s top draw. And Sarah Palin’s influence appears to be growing. She’s backed 20 winning candidates in this year’s primaries. But in an article published in this month’s Vanity Fair, author Michael Joseph Gross claims Palin is not who she appears to be. The story portrays Palin as leading a life shrouded in secrecy, using fear to control those around her. ANDREW BARR [REPORTER, POLITICO.COM]: Everyone who was leaking, who was talking to the press has been cut out of her circle. CORDES: The article gives new details about Palin’s heavily publicized campaign spending habits, saying she purchased over 400 items, including $3,000 on underwear and $20,000 on a new wardrobe for her husband, Todd. BARR: If you look through the campaign e-mails, if you look through disclosures, it seems like they’re going around, trying to, you know, bilk the RNC and others for as much money as they could get. CORDES: The article also sheds light on Palin’s public feud with her daughter’s former fiancee, Levi Johnston. Gross claims that before Johnston issued a public apology to Palin, she met with him privately and demanded to know if he was wearing a wire. In an exclusive interview with the Early Show last Friday, Levi said he regretted making that statement. LEVI JOHNSTON: The only thing I wish I wouldn’t have done is put out that apology, because it kind of makes me sound like a liar. CORDES: Palin has not commented on the article. In two weeks she will headline a GOP event in Iowa, adding to the speculation about her political plans for 2012. Nancy Cordes, CBS News, Washington. HILL: Joining us now is Vanity Fair writer Michael Joseph Gross. His article, ‘Sarah Palin: The Sound and the Fury,’ is in the magazine’s upcoming issue. Good to have you with us this morning. MICHAEL JOSEPH GROSS: Thanks for having me. HILL: You said the most important quote in this article is, ‘we weren’t good enough for America.’ Why do you feel that’s the most important quote that you have there? GROSS: When Sarah Palin got back to Wasilla after the election, she was in her house. The people from the Republican Party were trying to collect the clothing that had been purchased for return. She was talking to one of her children and she was crying and she said, ‘we weren’t good enough for America. We’ll never be good enough for America.’ I think she felt so rejected by this election that what we’re seeing subsequently has been a kind of vengeance on the country for rejecting her. I think what she’s doing is plugging into a similar sense of rejection among millions of people out there who feel like they’re not good enough. HILL: You had a tough time, you say, getting to people who are close to Sarah Palin, let alone Sarah Palin. First, tell us about the people you did speak to who are around her, who had been close in her camps. What kind of an impression did they give you of Sarah Palin? GROSS: The people who’ve been closest to her describe a temper that at first I couldn’t even believe could be true. They’d tell stories about screaming fits, about throwing things. We’re talking about everybody from friends who’ve stayed with the Palins, who’ve witnessed events where Sarah and Todd will empty the pantry of canned goods, throwing them at each other until the front of the refrigerator looks like it’s been shot up by a shot gun. HILL: Wow. GROSS: Everything from that to former assistants who’ve been so tortured by Palin that, in one case, one had to quit the job, seek psychiatric counseling, and leave the state to escape Palin’s influence. Because everybody who’s worked with her has seen the way that she exacts retribution on people after they leave. They’re afraid that she’s going to get them fired from their job, try to ruin their reputations. That’s the modus operandi. HILL: These are all some pretty strong allegations. You tried to get in touch with the Palin – with Sarah Palin, with her media people. A) Were you successful? And B) Did they tell you why they wouldn’t speak with you? Because they didn’t for this article. GROSS: The only responses that I received from them were that my request was under consideration. There was never any resolution to the conversation. That message was sent multiple times. And I tried everything. I tried sending messages through her father, through her hairdresser. I spent almost three weeks in Wasilla. So- HILL: Good to have you with us. It’s a fascinating article. It’s a fascinating read. GROSS: Thank you. HILL: Thanks for being with us. Michael Joseph Gross joining us from Vanity Fair.

See original here:
CBS Early Show Promotes Palin-Bashing Vanity Fair Article

CNN’s Sanchez Hesitant to Blame Left for Discovery Channel Terrorist, Says ‘Most’ Think He Went ‘Too Far’

CNN’s Rick Sanchez, who was quick to blame Fox News for the 2009 murders of three police officers in Pennsylvania , treaded much more carefully on Wednesday’s Rick’s List as he covered the eco-terrorist who brought guns, explosives, and took hostages at Discovery Channel’s headquarters. Sanchez stated that Lee may have been ” well-meaning ,” but ” most watching this would argue he may have taken [his cause] way too far on this day ” . Most? The breaking news about James Lee’s standoff at the educational channel’s Silver Spring, Maryland dominated Sanchez’s broadcast. Twenty-five minutes into the 3 pm Eastern hour, during an interview of former hostage negotiator Tom Fuentes, the anchor summarized Lee’s manifesto: “He apparently wants the Discovery Channel…[to] broadcast certain commitments to save the planet…He’s apparently anti-war….He’s concerned about global warming, talks about Malthusian sciences, continues to come back to saving the planet.” He then asked Fuentes, “So…if you get my drift, Tom, he’s very concerned. He’s an activist, may be very well-meaning, but he’s now put himself in a situation where he, the police officers and his hostages’ lives are endangered . What do you do?” Later that hour, Sanchez again described the eco-terrorist as a mere “activist” but also added that he was a ” very dangerous man .” He also asked correspondent Josh Levs, ” How can a man claim to be for saving the planet, apparently a peace activist, so to speak, while at the same time be threatening to blow himself and other people up and carrying a handgun? ” Nine minutes into the 4 pm Eastern hour, the CNN anchor skirted giving a definitive statement on the criminality of Lee’s actions: “For those of you just now joining us, we’ve got a pretty good bead on who this guy is. We understand what his concerns have been for some time. He’s a bit of an activist, a guy who truly believes, seemingly, in his heart that he needs to do all he can to save the planet. Most watching this would argue he may have taken it way too far on this day by endangering the lives of people in this building, as he seems to be doing right now .” Eleven minutes later, Sanchez did go so far to give a negative label of the eco-terrorist’s views: SANCHEZ: You have a right to believe whatever it is you want to believe, no matter how strange. There’s people who still say that they believe that there’s all kinds of stuff going on out there that may not be true. That doesn’t lead one to believe that any- on any given day, they’re going to take a gun or explosives and walk into a building and threaten the lives of people- although, I guess you must admit that even back then, you must have been taken aback. I mean, those theories seem- I’ll just say it- weird . Just before the bottom of the hour, the anchor went even further about Lee’s manifesto: “Police are trying to talk the guy out of the building by negotiating with him, by trying to reach some conclusion with him- that he’s achieved his goal of letting the world know what his concerns are about saving the planet, which are his concerns – albeit extreme – but those are his concerns and he appears to want to make sure that those concerns are heard.” During the last ten minutes of his program, it seems that Sanchez couldn’t make up his mind about Lee. At one point, he gave the following statement: “You hear of a lot of people who have causes. This particular person’s cause is saving the planet. But it’s how he goes about it, in a very unique way – even beyond what he’s doing here today, by endangering the lives of people stuck in a building with explosives, waving a handgun with hostage s- but what he actually says in his writings, in his manifesto that have certainly perked our curiosity and yours as well.” After Levs gave more background on the eco-terrorist’s views, he replied that it was a ” paradoxical theory, while it may be, and certainly, on this night, a dangerous one as well .” Sanchez was much more definitive on April 8, 2009, after three Pittsburgh police officers were shot and killed by a crazed gunman: ” That weekend tragedy involves a man who allegedly shot and killed three police officers in cold blood. Why? Because he was convinced, after no doubt watching Fox News and listening to right-wing radio, that quote, ‘Our rights were being infringed upon .'” When several congressmen asked for extra security after threats were made against them around the time of the vote on ObamaCare in March 2010, the CNN anchor repeatedly insinuated that Republican leaders and conservative media were to blame : ” Is there a possibility that that message isn’t getting out to the American people because these crazy talk show hosts that are so right-wing are out there using the most heated language and the most heated rhetoric that does, in fact, incite people to hate? “

Originally posted here:
CNN’s Sanchez Hesitant to Blame Left for Discovery Channel Terrorist, Says ‘Most’ Think He Went ‘Too Far’

Jonas Brothers Call ‘Camp Rock 2’ ‘Next Level’

‘The staging was phenomenal for the film,’ Joe Jonas says. By Jocelyn Vena Nick Jonas, Demi Lovato, Joe Jonas and Kevin Jonas Photo: Jim Spellman/ WireImage Pack your bags, pre-stamp your envelopes and get the campfire going. This Friday, the Jonas Brothers and friends will be heading back to Camp Rock in “Camp Rock 2: The Final Jam.” And the Jonases say that this time around everything is going to be bigger and better.

Read more:
Jonas Brothers Call ‘Camp Rock 2’ ‘Next Level’

YouTube Jihad: American Terror Imam Radicalizing Muslim Youth Online

He may be playing hide-and-seek from drone missiles in the caves of Yemen, but Al Qaeda cleric Anwar Al-Awlaki is still attempting to poison the minds of young Muslim Americans through the use of YouTube and other social media. The extent of Al-Awlaki’s reach on the internet is outlined in a new report released by the Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI) on Aug. 28. The report describes the millions of views garnered by Al-Awlaki’s YouTube video clips and the online networking of his rabid fan base. A former imam at the Dar al-Hijrah mosque in Virginia, the American-born Al-Awlaki has increasingly been using social media as a recruiting method for would-be jihadists, leading terrorist watchers to dub him the “[Osama] bin Laden of the internet” and the “sheikh of YouTube.” Al-Awlaki has been tied to the Sept. 11 hijackers, the Christmas Day bomber and the Fort Hood shooter. This past spring, President Obama ordered that the cleric be killed on sight, but the American Civil Liberties Union filed suit on Aug. 30 to prevent the military from targeting the U.S. citizen without a trial. According to MEMRI, after Al-Awlaki’s personal website was shuttered in 2009, YouTube became the “largest clearinghouse of his online videos.” “A quick tabulation of viewings of Al-Awlaki’s 2,500-plus clips – comprising lectures, sermons, and compilation videos supporting his jihadist philosophy – now indicates well over three million views, and counting,” MEMRI reported. “These clips include Al-Awlaki calling Muslims to jihad, expressions of support for martyrdom attacks, and encouragement to kill American soldiers.” Al-Awlaki has even begun posting his recruitment videos directly to YouTube, as opposed to the radical Islamist websites that normally host those types of clips. A search for “Al Awlaki” on YouTube turns up 4,600 results, These videos are publicly accessible, and can easily be viewed by children. In one extreme case, a young American Muslim follower of Al-Awlaki created a “Jihadi Fan Club” page on YouTube, which MEMRI called “a clear example of a young American convert radicalized by YouTube.” “Anwar Al-Awlaki is NOT a terrorist. He simply wants America to change its unjust foreign policy,” wrote Jihadi Fan Club on his YouTube page. “He does NOT call for fighting out of hatred for America, he call for fighting in the name of self defense. Anwar Al-Awlaki tells the sincere Muslims to fight against the U.S. troops and all the oppressors of the Muslims.” Underneath one video in support of the Ground Zero mosque, Jihadi Fan Club posted a shout-out to Al-Awlaki and Abu Monsour Al-Amriki – an American-born member of terror group Al-Shabab who posts his own rap videos endorsing jihad on YouTube – thanking the terrorists for their “inspiration.” In another post, Jihad Fan Club argued that the Americans murdered on Sept. 11 were not innocent civilians, and that they deserved the attack because they supported the U.S. economic and foreign policies. “[P]eople want to say, ‘Well, the people who did 9/11, they attacked innocent people.’ Well not necessarily; you pretend like the World Trade Center and the Pentagon was a daycare center or a maternity ward. No. The World Trade Center was the epicenter of American economy that funds so much death and destruction in the Muslim world,” wrote Jihad Fan Club under a video expressing support for the Sept. 11 attacks. “If the people who did 9/11 wanted to kill innocent people, they would have bombed a school, they would have bombed a church, they would have bombed a daycare center, they would have bombed a grocery store.” Underneath a video of a CNN news program, Jihad Fan Club wrote that “Muslim lap dogs” are trying to trick other Muslims into condemning terrorism and being kind to non-Muslims. “Killing the innocent is WORNG [sic], but CNN has an EVIL agenda which is to trick you into thinking that terrorism is caused by misguided Muslims instead of U.S. foreign policy,” wrote Jihad Fan Club. “They also want you to spend your time condemning terrorist attacks instead of using your power to fight against the American government, its puppet regimes and its allies which is the cause of all the violence in the Muslim world and the terror attacks in the US & Canada. Oh Muslims please do not be fooled by these evil disbelievers and their Muslim lap dogs. A real Muslim is always harsh towards the non Muslims and lenient towards the Muslims.” Jihad Fan Club’s page also features videos by the American-born Al Qaeda spokesman Adam Gadahn, and praise for terror leader Osama bin Laden. Al-Awlaki’s use of the internet as a recruiting tool is noteworthy, especially because of the success the cleric has had at recruiting and inspiring American-grown terrorists in the past. MEMRI lists more than a dozen terrorist suspects that were radicalized through Al-Awlaki’s online presence, including Paul and Nadia Rockwood (an Alaskan couple who made a “hit-list” of U.S. officials who “desecrated Islam”), Fort Hood shooter Nidal Hasan, Time Square bomber Faisal Shahzad, and Sharif Mobley (a 24-year old American who is charged with killing a Yemeni soldier). Al-Awlaki was also a spiritual adviser to two of the Sept. 11 hijackers and Christmas Day bomber Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab. But MEMRI noted that the jihadist infiltration of YouTube is unlikely to end soon. “[A]s Western governments increasingly take down and interfere with traditional terrorist websites, Al-Qaeda and other jihadists have grown more dependent upon on YouTube and other social media outlets, including Facebook and Twitter. To date, these outlets seem unprepared to effectively address this problem,” the group reported. According to YouTube’s “Community Guidelines,” hate speech is not permitted on the website. “We encourage free speech and defend everyone’s right to express unpopular points of view. But we don’t permit hate speech (speech which attacks or demeans a group based on race or ethnic origin, religion, disability, gender, age, veteran status, and sexual orientation/gender identity),” reads the Community Guidelines. A spokeswoman for YouTube told the Media Research Center that “Because it is difficult to verify the identity of users who post videos…an individual who claims to be a member of a terrorist organization (a claim we may not be able to verify) but who posts videos and comments that comply with the rules, may not be suspended from the site.” However, she said that users who “encourage others to commit specific, serious acts of violence, with or without claiming membership in a terrorist group, would be in violation of our policies.” One of the reasons why YouTube has difficult time addressing the problem of terrorist videos on the site may be because the enormous number of videos uploaded each day makes it nearly impossible to review and approve each one individually. “Every minute, 24 hours of video are uploaded to YouTube, totaling hundreds of thousands of videos every day.  To be able to offer YouTube at this scale, we cannot review content before it goes live,” said the spokeswoman. This isn’t the first time that YouTube has been cited for having controversial content on its site. A Media Research Center special report found that the website features thousands of sexually explicit videos, including soft-core porn, and is often used by porn producers to drive traffic to their X-rated websites.

Read more:
YouTube Jihad: American Terror Imam Radicalizing Muslim Youth Online