Tag Archives: philadelphia

Thom Hartmann: Gingrich, Palin, ‘Whole Right-Wing Crazy Train’ Threatens Our Soldiers

On August 31, liberal talk radio host Thom Hartmann complained that the Obama White House needs to “stop taking seriously every feigned outrage of the right” like the Ground Zero mosque. A few minutes later, he unloaded:   [Gingrich is] willing to sell out our country. He’s willing to see Americans die…He’s putting our soldiers at risk. Newt Gingrich, Sarah Palin, the whole right-wing crazy-train bunch of them, Glenn Beck…the right-wing hate machine on…talk radio. They are willing to see…another [terrorist] attack in an American city. In fact, I think, frankly, they would love it ’cause they could blame it on Obama. Why is it that every time conservatives question a radical Muslim imam like the Ground Zero imam, it’s now putting our soldiers at risk?

See the article here:
Thom Hartmann: Gingrich, Palin, ‘Whole Right-Wing Crazy Train’ Threatens Our Soldiers

Obamanomics Open Thread: Poverty on Track for Record Gain in 2009

For general discussion and debate. Possible talking point: Here’s change you can believe in! The number of people in the U.S. who are in poverty is on track for a record increase on President Barack Obama’s watch, with the ranks of working-age poor approaching 1960s levels that led to the national war on poverty. Census figures for 2009 – the recession-ravaged first year of the Democrat’s presidency – are to be released in the coming week, and demographers expect grim findings. The anticipated poverty rate increase – from 13.2 percent to about 15 percent – would be another blow to Democrats struggling to persuade voters to keep them in power. (more stats follow) Should those estimates hold true, some 45 million people in this country, or more than 1 in 7, were poor last year. It would be the highest single-year increase since the government began calculating poverty figures in 1959. The previous high was in 1980 when the rate jumped 1.3 percentage points to 13 percent during the energy crisis. Among the 18-64 working-age population, the demographers expect a rise beyond 12.4 percent, up from 11.7 percent. That would make it the highest since at least 1965, when another Democratic president, Lyndon B. Johnson, launched the war on poverty that expanded the federal government’s role in social welfare programs from education to health care.  To be sure, this is really bad news for Obama and Democrats. However, if the poverty rate ends up being the highest since LBJ started this “war on poverty,” doesn’t it mean we’ve lost, and that expanding “the federal government’s role in social welfare programs from education to health care” has totally failed? Of course, such an obvious conclusion won’t be made by the Left which will certainly use this data to call for even  more socialism, correct?

Read the original post:
Obamanomics Open Thread: Poverty on Track for Record Gain in 2009

NFL Opening Sunday Open Thread

Are you ready for some football (entire schedule follows, chat about other sports also welcomed)? SUN, SEP 12 TIME (ET) TV RESOURCES LOCATION Carolina at NY Giants 1:00 PM FOX Tickets | Travel New Meadowlands Stadium Atlanta at Pittsburgh 1:00 PM FOX Tickets | Travel Heinz Field Cleveland at Tampa Bay 1:00 PM CBS Tickets | Travel Raymond James Stadium Denver at Jacksonville 1:00 PM CBS Tickets | Travel EverBank Field Indianapolis at Houston 1:00 PM CBS Tickets | Travel Reliant Stadium Miami at Buffalo 1:00 PM CBS Tickets | Travel Ralph Wilson Stadium Detroit at Chicago 1:00 PM FOX Tickets | Travel Soldier Field Oakland at Tennessee 1:00 PM CBS Tickets | Travel LP Field Cincinnati at New England 1:00 PM CBS Tickets | Travel Gillette Stadium Arizona at St. Louis 4:15 PM FOX Tickets | Travel Edward Jones Dome San Francisco at Seattle 4:15 PM FOX Tickets | Travel Qwest Field Green Bay at Philadelphia 4:15 PM FOX Tickets | Travel Lincoln Financial Field Dallas at Washington 8:20 PM NBC Tickets | Travel FedEx Field 

Go here to read the rest:
NFL Opening Sunday Open Thread

Matthews to Dem Candidate: I Hope Your Party Gets Organized and Wins This Thing!

It’s no secret that Chris Matthews once flirted with the idea of  running for Senate in Pennsylvania , but since he didn’t throw his hat into that race, the Hardball host, on Thursday night, did everything he could to help Joe Sestak beat Republican Pat Toomey, as he urged: “I hope your party gets organized up there, because the Democratic Party of Ed Rendell and you and all those other guys ought to get together with Brady and win this thing!” And even before Matthews invited viewers to “Meet Joe Sestak” in an interview segment, the MSNBCer began cheerleading for him in a preview as he teased: “Up next, Joe Sestak from my home state of Pennsylvania, he’s fighting hard, the good fight against Pat Toomey, the Club for Growther of the far right.” The following exchanges were aired on the September 2 edition of Hardball: CHRIS MATTHEWS: Congressman Joe Sestak pulled off a big upset back in May when he beat Arlen Specter, he had been senator forever in Pennsylvania, in that primary. Sestak may need another upset come November. He faces a tough political climate up there. Pat Toomey, the Club for Growther of the far right is averaging a six-point gain on him right now in the latest pollsters average poll. Congressman Sestak joins right now us now. You know Pennsylvania, as you know, I’m talking to an expert, it’s a purple state. It’s somewhere in the middle. It’s a John Wayne state. It’s not a far right or far left state. How come Toomey is doing well when he’s on the far right side? What is going on? Isn’t he a [Rick] Santorum type? … MATTHEWS: Let me ask you about the support from the establishment up there. You beat the heck out of these people. You took the money people in big Philly. You took the machine, such as it was, on that day, it could be more interested, I think, on general election day and you beat the heck out of them. You pulled the biggest upset. Are those guys still mad at you for beating, the underdog, for beating their guy Specter? JOE SESTAK: I’m told they’re all gonna be there. A lot of them are gone for pre-Labor Day. And they’re gonna be there right after Labor Day. Look, I’m not going to depend upon that. You know we raised close to $2 million in four weeks, right after the election. We’re out there working every day. But more than that, I am going to help leverage those centers of excellence. I also have over 25 offices open, 25,000 phone calls a day since 1 January. We’re gonna build a warfare coalition just like those 30 ships I had when I was a Navy admiral, doing the retaliatory strikes off Afghanistan, working together. But I also want you to know this Chris. I’m also focused on moderate Republicans and independents. I think when they find how extreme Congressman Toomey is, I mean if you liked Rick Santorum, you’re gonna love Pat Toomey. MATTHEWS: How is he extreme? Give me some examples! I know I asked about the steel industry a while ago and he said basically he’s a free marketer, “Let it rot! Don’t do anything. The government has no responsibility to save industries that are in trouble.” What’s your view and what’s wrong with his? SESTAK: Well let me tell you, in his book he calls it “creative destruction.” It’s okay that we have China subsidizing their exports because it’ll have creative destruction in America where people will be unemployed, but they’ll find a job somewhere else. You know zero, zero taxes for corporations where you don’t have to pay for it. Look when he was in Hong Kong, working for a Hong Kong billionaire, he actually worked on those currency swaps that helped China keep down over the years those, the, the value of, of the, the wan. And so we have, as someone who believes “benefit big business, benefit Wall Street and wealth might trickle down.” Look he actually believed, when he was on the Small Business committee, he slashed in half the small business budget. He voted against studies for women to find out why are they’re only getting two percent of all federal contracts supposed to go to small businesses? He just voted against that. Time after time, whether its education. Here’s Philadelphia, you talk about a challenge in Philadelphia? Only about 28 percent of African-American males are graduating from high school there. And Chris it’s only 33 percent of whites. And so I’m on the Education committee. This is about the common good. And he helped slash the education budget by $3 billion and voted against Pell Grants. He, what he did when he was president and this is the worst, I think. When he was president of Club for Growth — and I like Pat, I’ve had a beer with him — but when he was president of Club for Growth which John McCain called “a grab bag for the ultra rich,”when he was president he actually had as his principle mission purging the Republican Party of moderates and went after Senator Lincoln Chafee and others. MATTHEWS: I know. SESTAK: In my mind we don’t need an ideology, we need someone who is willing to work. MATTHEWS: Is he a right winger? Is he a right winger? Is he a right winger? SESTAK: He, he’s farther from the right wing. Yes he’s much, he’s extreme. Look… MATTHEWS: Okay let me ask you, let’s talk, let’s talk turkey, Admiral, Congressman. I mean you deserve both titles. You’ve earned them. Let me ask you this. Are you gonna get Bill Clinton in there? It seems to me that if you look at Southwestern Pennsylvania, if you look at anywhere in that state, among the African-American community, which has been hammered with unemployment. They, if they had the jobs that the Irish guys had, in the neighborhoods I grew up in today, they’d be unbelievably middle class. They’d be in such a great shape. Those jobs are gone, those steel jobs. Let me ask you. Are you gonna bring Bill Clinton in there? Because, it seems to me, he would be even better than the President, to help you in Pennsylvania? SESTAK: Yes. Yeah he’s already come in for Scranton. Great rally. Unfortunately I was down in Washington for the good business of voting for that EFNEP bill that Congressman Toomey opposed and would have had 12,000 Pennsylvanians… MATTHEWS: Well you gonna bring him back? SESTAK: …if we hadn’t passed it. Absolutely. Actually I was talking with them the other day and they just wanted to know what days. They tell me I’m their top priority and I’m gonna keep working on that. So, I hope to see him out there a lot. MATTHEWS: Well I hope your party, I hope your party gets organized up there, because the Democratic Party of Ed Rendell and you and all those other guys ought to get together with Brady and win this thing! Anyway, thank you Congressman Joe Sestak, running for Pennsylvania senator.

Excerpt from:
Matthews to Dem Candidate: I Hope Your Party Gets Organized and Wins This Thing!

Jay-Z’s Yankee Memorabilia Is A Home Run, Fans Say

‘The Yankees selling Jay-Z stuff is just the best of both worlds,’ one fan says of Hov endorsing limited-run apparel ahead of concerts with Eminem. By MTV News staff Jay-Z and Yankees merchandise at Yankee Stadium Photo: Rya Backer/ MTV News Jay-Z already has one clothing line in Rocawear, and now that the Brooklyn rapper has partnered with the Yankees to co-brand threads in anticipation of his and Eminem’s September concerts , does Hov have a new empire on his hands? Well, not quite, since the Jay-Z/Yankee pact is only for a limited time . But MTV News hit the Bronx to get the word on whether the partnership is a home run. “I thought it was pretty cool, I think it’s cool that he’s doing stuff with the Yankees,” Paulette Esparza told MTV News. “The design is cool.” The line features an array of T-shirts, jerseys with S. Carter and the number four printed on the back (Jay’s birthday is December 4) and a series of fitted hats, including an all-black Yankees cap with The Blueprint 3 insignia on the side. The memorabilia is on sale, only at Yankee Stadium, through September 14. Despite the limited run, interest in the items appears to be high. (It remained unclear at press time whether Eminem would strike a similar deal with his hometown Detroit Tigers baseball team.) “I really like the hat, the hat is pretty cool,” Lauren Mastroianni said while visiting the ballpark. “I was just about to say that,” her friend Mike Nalafronte chimed in about the fitted cap. “With the emblem on it, I like that.” The marriage between Jay-Z and the Yankees began last year as the storied baseball franchise marched toward the World Series, which they eventually captured over the Philadelphia Philles in six games last October. Jay’s “Empire State of Mind” (featuring Alicia Keys) became the unofficial anthem of the team after captain Derek Jeter used the track for his at-bat music. Jay-Z then performed the number with Alicia Keys before Game 2 in New York and later rode with the team during their championship parade. The song also became the rapper’s first Billboard Hot 100 chart-topper, and the Yankees earned their 27th championship. “The Yankees selling Jay-Z stuff is just the best of both worlds, isn’t it,” tourist Alex Matthewson noted. What do you think of Jay-Z teaming with the Yankees to make limited-run threads? Tell us in the comments! Related Photos Jay-Z And The Yankees Team-Up To Represent New York Related Artists Jay-Z

Read more here:
Jay-Z’s Yankee Memorabilia Is A Home Run, Fans Say

MSNBC Suggests Palin & Bachmann Encouraged Shooting Minorities, Ignores Obama’s ‘We Bring a Gun’ to Fight GOP

On Thursday’s The Ed Show on MSNBC, substitute host Cenk Uygur — also of the Young Turks — blamed conservative opposition to the Ground Zero mosque for acts of violence against Muslims, and charged that the Republican party is the “party of hate.” He soon added: “Then there`s the vitriolic fight against immigrants, undocumented ones and in Arizona just people who happen to look undocumented. And, of course, there`s the grand daddy of all prejudice, fear and hatred stoked up against Muslims in this country. Now, it`s gotten so bad that a young man stabbed a cabbie in the neck and face Tuesday after finding out that he was Muslim.” He eventually asked: “What black person, gay guy or girl, immigrant or Muslim-American in their right mind would vote for the Republican party? They might as well hang a sign around their neck saying I hate myself.” Uygur also recited a list of violent incidents from the past couple of years, while also running clips of conservatives like Sarah Palin, Michele Bachmann and Bill O’Reilly in an attempt to prove that they were responsible for inciting specific violent incidents. At one point, he even used edited clips of Sarah Palin and Michele Bachmann in such a way as to suggest that they had encouraged people to shoot Muslims or other minorities. After recounting recent incidents of violence against Muslims, he tied in Palin and Bachmann: CENK UYGUR: If the manufactured rage against minorities and Muslims in particular was not bad enough, Republicans across the country have added an element of violent imagery to top it off. SARAH PALIN, AT PODIUM, UNDATED: It`s not a time to retreat. It`s a time to reload. REP. MICHELE BACHMANN (R-MN) AUDIO DATED MARCH 2009: I want people in Minnesota armed and dangerous on this issue. Palin first used this phrase after the passage of ObamaCare, while the clip in question comes from an event in Nevada from March 27 of this year. And Bachmann’s quote was in reference to the Democratic energy plan. The MSNBC host did not mention that President Barack Obama himself once made a much more direct metaphor about using a gun to fight political opposition as he reassured attendees of a fund-raiser in Philadelphia in June 2008: “If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun. Because from what I understand, folks in Philly like a good brawl. I’ve seen Eagles fans.” More of the context of Palin’s words from the March 27 event, in which she clarified that her words were meant to inspire people to peacefully vote and take part in politics: If we stick to our principles, we’re going to be just fine. Now, when I talk about it’s not a time to retreat it’s a time to reload , what I’m talking about, now, media, try to get this right, okay? That’s not inciting violence. What that is doing is trying to inspire people to get involved in their local elections and these upcoming federal elections. It’s telling people that their arms are their vote. It’s not inciting violence. It’s telling people, don’t ever let anybody tell you to sit down and shut up, Americans. You stand up and you stand tall. And we’re just going to be fine. And more of the context of Bachmann’s statement : “And I’m going to have materials for people when they leave. I want people in Minnesota armed and dangerous on this issue of the energy tax because we need to fight back. Thomas Jefferson told us, having a revolution every now and then is a good thing.” Uygur also never relayed to viewers that the suspect in the stabbing case, Michael Enright, was involved with a liberal, pro-Muslim organization that supports building a mosque near Ground Zero, or that, according to Wednesday’s World News on ABC, anti-Muslim hate crimes are “not on the rise.” ABC News correspondent Jeremy Hubbard: “most recent FBI crime stats show in 2008, there were 123 anti-Islam bias crimes nationwide a number that paled in comparison to at least one other religion [1,055 against Jews]. And even in New York, police say crimes against Muslims are not on the rise.” Instead of informing MSNBC viewers of any holes in his anti-conservative theory, Uygur brought in Mark Potok of the left-wing Southern Poverty Law Center to agree with his indictment of Ground Zero mosque opponents. Potok: “I think it`s about as clear as it could be that this comes right out of the really rancid debate around the whole Ground Zero Islamic Center.” Below is a transcript of the relevant portion of the Thursday, August 26, The Ed Show on MSNBC, with critical portions in bold : CENK UYGUR, ANCHOR: Good evening, everybody and welcome to “The Ed Show.” I`m Cenk Uygur in for Ed Schultz. These stories are hot tonight. The right wing has spent weeks stoking hate on the Muslim community center near Ground Zero. Now that hate-filled rhetoric is turning into real violence and they pretend to be surprised. My commentary on that in just a moment. … Tonight, we start with the party of hate. The Republican Party in this country has been running on hate and division for the last 50 years. First, it was the southern strategy meant to discriminate against African-Americans in order to gain white southern votes. That worked in capturing the south for a generation or more, but they lost the entire African-American vote for even longer. That`s what happens when you slap someone across the face. Then, once that well started to run dry, they apologized. In 2005, Republican Chairman Ken Mehlman told the NAACP he was sorry: Quote, “Some Republicans gave up on winning the African-American vote looking the other way or trying to benefit politically from racial polarization. I`m here today as the Republican chairman to tell you we were wrong.” And then they unapologetically picked their next target, gay Americans. They ran campaigns all across America, premised on taking away rights from gays in this country. Now, one of the architects of that plan, Ken Mehlman, who ran George W. Bush`s campaign in `04 and was the RNC chair in `06, has come out and said he`s gay. Again, our bad, our mistake, not that they`re stopping attacks on that front, I`ll have more on that later. Then there`s the vitriolic fight against immigrants, undocumented ones and in Arizona just people who happen to look undocumented. And, of course, there`s the grand daddy of all prejudice, fear and hatred stoked up against Muslims in this country. Now, it`s gotten so bad that a young man stabbed a cabbie in the neck and face Tuesday after finding out that he was Muslim. He yelled, “Asalaam Alaikum, this is your checkpoint.” Ironically, “Asalaam Alaikum,” means peace be with you. But Islam has been so twisted by conservative demagogues here that a peaceful greeting has been misinterpreted as a war cry and then used against Muslims. Then a man yesterday walked into a mosque in Queens and urinated all over their prayer rugs while yelling that all Muslims were terrorists. Gee, I wonder where he got that idea? NEWT GINGRICH, FORMER HOUSE SPEAKER: Nazis don`t have the right to put up a sign next to the holocaust museum in Washington. We would never accept the Japanese putting up a site next to Pearl Harbor. There`s no reason for to us accept a mosque next to the World Trade Center. UYGUR: If the manufactured rage against minorities and Muslims in particular was not bad enough, Republicans across the country have added an element of violent imagery to top it off. SARAH PALIN, AT PODIUM: It`s not a time to retreat. It`s a time to reload. REP. MICHELE BACHMANN (R-MN) AUDIO DATED MARCH 2009: I want people in Minnesota armed and dangerous on this issue. UYGUR: And it hasn`t been just Muslim-Americans who`ve been on the receiving end of this violence. There was Scott Roeder who killed abortion provider Dr. Tiller after hearing provocation like this: BILL O`REILLY, FNC HOST: No matter what you think about the abortion issue, you should be very disturbed by what continues to happen in Kansas. This man, Dr. George Tiller – known as Tiller, the baby killer – is performing late-term abortions without defining the specific medical reasons why. UYGUR: Then there was the guy in Pittsburgh who killed three police officers because he was convinced they were coming for his guns. Gee, I wonder where he got that idea. GLENN BECK, FNC HOST: He will slowly but surely take away your gun or take away your ability to shoot a gun, carry a gun. He will make them more expensive. He`ll tax them out of existence. He will because he has said he would. He will tax your gun or take your gun away one way or another. UYGUR: Then there was the man in Tennessee who shot people inside what he considered a, quote, “liberal church.” He was reading O`Reilly and Hannity`s books on how terrible liberals are, and might have heard a rant like this. BECK: I beg you, look for the words social justice or economic justice on your church website. If you find it, run as fast as you can. UYGUR: Look, this is destructive to our country. It rips us all apart. The demagoguery especially based on race or religion is also destructive to the idea of America. That we are all created equal, and are all equally American. But it`s also destructive to the Republican Party. What black person, gay guy or girl, immigrant or Muslim American in their right mind would vote for the Republican Party? They might as well hang a sign around their neck saying I hate myself. So, in the end, the GOP will be left holding a shrinking part of the U.S. population screaming about how they hate everyone else. That`s a terrible political strategy. Don`t get me wrong. Demagoguing does work in the short run. That`s why they do it. They`ve been doing it since McCarthy because it gives them a temporary leg up in the next election, but in the long run, it kills your own brand. You`re not going to get a majority of even the white voters you think you`re going for by being the party of hate. They`re much better than that. They`re Americans. So after a couple more Muslims and others get attacked and the passion has died down, America realizes again that there`s no bogeyman coming to get them, the Sharia law is not about to be imposed in Des Moines or Sacramento, they will reject this politics of hate. Then where will the Republican Party be with even less voters, even more marginalized and probably even more angry? We`re witnessing the death pangs of a once great party, the party of Lincoln. That is no more. If they keep going this way, they`re going to go from the Grand Old Party to the sad little party and they`ll only have themselves to blame. Now, tell me what you think in our telephone survey the number to dial is 877-ed-msnbc. My question tonight is, do you think the GOP strategy of hate and fear will backfire? Press one for yes, press two for no. I`ll bring you the results later in the show. Now joining me is Mark Potok, one of America`s foremost experts on hate crimes. He`s the intelligence project director for the Southern Poverty Law Center. Mark, let`s look at what happened today with the cabbie or I should say yesterday getting stabbed. Do you think that`s just, oh, random coincidence that a Muslim cabbie happened to get stabbed yesterday or is this related to all the demagoguery about the so-called mosque near Ground Zero? MARK POTOK, SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER: Well, I think it`s about as clear as it could be that this comes right out of the really rancid debate around the whole Ground Zero Islamic Center. I mean, you named some of the villains. No doubt about it, Newt Gingrich and Sarah Palin and so on, but we also have major outfits like the National Republican Trust Political Action Committee claiming that the Islamic center will be a celebration of the murder of 3,000 people. You know, that kind of language is not only grotesquely false, but it is obviously demonizing. And that kind of demonization, as you`ve suggested, is precisely what`s leading to what seems to be a real spike in anti-Muslim hate crimes. UYGUR: Mark, that leads to the obvious next question of what can we do about it because, I mean, you see it. They say, oh, the baby killer, “What are you going to do about it?” they`re asking their audience, and then, all of a sudden, somebody kills Dr. Tiller. You know, you see it with the liberal churches. You just saw the whole list. Now they`re doing it with Muslims, but they have First Amendment rights, so what can you do about it? POTOK: Well, one hopes that one can shame some of these political leaders into saying something a little more responsible. You know, you`re speaking about the Republican Party. It`s probably worth remembering that one of the very decent things that President Bush did was immediately after, actually nine days after 9/11, he gave a very important speech in which he talked about Muslims were not our enemies, Arabs were not our enemies. A very specific network of terrorists was our enemy. And I think that Bush actually had the effect of tamping down what could have been an absolutely amazing backlash against Muslims and perceived Muslims. It`s worth remembering immediately after 9/11, there was a 1700 percent rise in anti-Muslim hate crimes. But, by the beginning of the next year, 2002, that had dropped by more than two-thirds. So I think that when political leaders like Bush speak out responsibly, it works. It`s helpful. UYGUR: No, and you do have to give credit to Bush on that, there`s no question about that. What didn`t help is him randomly attacking another Muslim country that didn`t have anything to do with 9/11. That didn`t really help the situation. POTOK: Of course. UYGUR: And it seems the Republicans have gone the more radical since Bush. But one final question for you: What`s happened since Obama took office? Has there been a rise in hate crimes, etc.? POTOK: Well, there has definitely been a rise in threats towards the president, in domestic terrorism aimed at the president and at hate speech essentially revolving around the idea that we have a black man and his black family in the White House. So that`s undeniable. I mean, we`ve seen skin head assassination plots, a guy who wanted to set off a dirty bomb at the inauguration and a whole long list. Many of the cases you mentioned like the man who murdered three officers in Pittsburgh were also influenced by this anti-Obama atmosphere a nd the idea that whites are losing their majority in this country. So this seems to be we`re seeing right now a kind of another spasm of the same kind of hate directed against people who do not look like the white majority. UYGUR: All right, thank you, Mark. We appreciate you coming in.

See the article here:
MSNBC Suggests Palin & Bachmann Encouraged Shooting Minorities, Ignores Obama’s ‘We Bring a Gun’ to Fight GOP

Ryan Howard ejected

Ryan Howard was ejected in the 14th inning while arguing a check swing that resulted in his fifth strikeout of the night. The Phillies went on to lose to the Houston Astros 4-2 in 16 innings. Ryan Howard cost the Philadelphia Phillies a game they desperately needed last night in the NL East playoff chase. The Phillies are 2.5 games behind the Atlanta Braves for first place in the division. With the Braves losing last night, the Phillies had an opportunity to make up a game on the division lea

See the article here:
Ryan Howard ejected

George Clooney girlfriend 2010

Ride on! George Clooney and girlfriend Elisabetta Canalis work up a sweat with a bike ride near his Lake Como home in Laglio, Italy, on Tuesday. The online version of People Magazine is sporting a photo of George Clooney wearing a purple and white Affton basketball t-shirt. Clooney and his girlfriend, Elisabetta Canalis, are featured in the magazine#39;s “Star Tracks” photo section bike riding yesterday near his Lake Como home in Laglio, Italy. George Clooney will receive the Bob Hope Humanita

Read more here:
George Clooney girlfriend 2010

Former White House Correspondents President Denounces ‘Travesty’ of Fox News Getting Front Row Seat

For some in the White House Press Corps, literally thanking God for the existence of a terrorist organization is less controversial than being owned by a company that gives more money to one political party than the other. That, at least, is the standard former WHCA president Edwin Chen has set forth. In an interview with the far-left blog Media Matters, Chen dubbed “a travesty” the WHCA’s decision to award a front-row seat in the briefing room to Fox News. His objection? “The vacancy was created because of an ideological conflict,” and would be filled by “another cloud of ideological conflict.” The first ideological conflict to which Chen referred was Helen Thomas’s retirement, forced by a video showing her making anti-Semitic comments. The second: the political contributions of Fox’s parent company, News Corp. The years of offensive, derogatory, and (to say the least) controversial comments from Thomas – such as “thank God for Hezbollah” and “why does [George W. Bush] want to drop bombs on innocent Iraqis?” – are apparently, in Chen’s mind, not indicative of “ideological conflict” as he uses the phrase in this context. Thomas’s presence in the front row was never an issue of concern for Chen until her final outburst as a White House reporter. In fact, Chen defended Thomas’s record of journalistic fairness even after she retired. “She was a bipartisan inflictor of pain,” he told NPR . But Chen lamented to Media Matters that Thomas retired in the midst of “this conflict over politics and a question of fairness,” and that Fox “drags in all of this controversy” because of its parent company’s political donations. But if the issue is controversy – if Chen believes that White House reporters should not drag controversy into the briefing room – why is this only becoming an issue now? Why is controversy surrounding Fox News any more of a disqualifying factor than controversy surrounding Helen Thomas? Of course Chen and others will note that Thomas is an opinion columnist, not a “straight news” reporter. To which any sensible observer will reply that no one is citing Fox’s coverage of the White House as cause for concern. The controversy has to do not with Fox’s news operation, but rather with its parent company’s political activities. If Fox’s discontents in the WHCA were able to claim that Fox’s news operation is too opinionated, or that its parent company’s political activities are directly affecting its work in the White House press pool, they would do so. Another former WHCA president, former Knight Ridder reporter Ron Hutcheson, takes a similar angle, raising the issue of whether Fox can report fairly without actually citing any of Fox’s reporting. Hutcheson told Media Matters that “a big political contribution by any news organization raises some questions. Clearly the management of Fox has political views.” Since Hutcheson and Chen are so concerned about “political views” staining the WHCA’s reputation for fairness, why are they more concerned with hypothetical bias from reporters who have not themselves demonstrated political favoritism than they are with Helen Thomas, a White House reporter who was open about her political favoritism? Thomas proudly proclaimed her political views on more than one occasion. “I’m a liberal, I was born a liberal, and I will be a liberal ’til the day I die,” she told the Philadelphia Inquirer. “I’d say I’m about as far left as you can go,” she told the Fox Business Network’s Stuart Varney. If the issue is journalistic fairness – whether White House correspondents can give those they are covering a fair shake – you would think that the litany of outrageous statements from Thomas, coupled with her self-proclaimed uber-leftism, would set off more alarms than the fact that the Fox correspondent’s news organization’s parent company gave more to one political party than the other. The real “travesty” is the double standard at play. A couple concluding notes on Chen: the Washington Examiner’s Julie Mason told Media Matters that the WHCA’s decision on the vacant seat came down to one between Fox and Bloomberg, Chen’s former employer. In other words, he’s not exactly a neutral arbiter of this dispute. Chen’s current employer is the Natural Resources Defense Council. If his double standard on controversial White House correspondents did not tip you off to his personal political views, that fact should.

See the rest here:
Former White House Correspondents President Denounces ‘Travesty’ of Fox News Getting Front Row Seat

NYT Article Admits DDT Ban as a Cause of Bedbug Outbreak

Sleep tight. Don’t let the bedbugs bite. Unfortunately for residents of many urban areas such as New York and Philadelphia, the bedbugs are not only biting but spreading at an alarming rate. Despite this outbreak, the mainstream media has until recently kept insisting that bedbugs developed a resistance to DDT so any emergency lifting of the EPA ban on that pesticide is unnecessary. However, your humble correspondent has speculated that the MSM would eventually have to change its position on the DDT ban due to the fact that so many of its members are being assaulted by bedbug attacks which keep increasing despite the use of other pesticides. Well, it now appears that New York Times writer, Emily B. Hager, has had a revelation about DDT. While its not an outright call for a lifting of the DDT, consider it an important pit stop on the way to demanding the ban be lifted: … Bedbugs, once nearly eradicated, have spread across New York City, in part because of the decline in the use of DDT. According to the city’s Department of Housing and Preservation, the number of bedbug violations has gone up 67 percent in the last two years. In the most recent fiscal year, which ended on June 30, the city’s 311 help line recorded 12,768 bedbug complaints, 16 percent more than the previous year and 39 percent above the year before. A New York City community health survey showed that in 2009, 1 in 15 New Yorkers had bedbugs in their homes, a number that is probably higher now.  Yes, the MSM meme seems to have shifted from the claim that DDT would be ineffective against bedbugs to the admission that the current outbreak is due to a decline in its use. And the New York Times is not alone in admitting that the lack of DDT is a cause for the bedbug outbreak. Business Week is now also admitting that the ban on DDT as a cause for the bedbug outbreak: Experts are baffled by the resurgence of the tiny reddish-brown insects that feed off human and animal blood, their bites often leaving red welts. Entomologists say the pests are appearing on a scale not seen since before World War II and cite increases in global travel and the elimination of certain chemicals, like DDT, that were once used to treat bedbugs, as possible factors contributing to the upsurge. And now that media outlets are willing to admit that the ban on DDT helped caused this bedbug outbreak, a demand for the EPA to at least temporarily lift its ban can’t be far behind. Annoyance over lack of sleep due to biting bedbugs should trump tree-hugging political correctness over continuing the DDT ban.

Read more:
NYT Article Admits DDT Ban as a Cause of Bedbug Outbreak