From our friends at Reason.tv : Question: Are lawmakers in Sacramento really putting the interests of the big labor ahead of children’s health?
Original post:
Union Jobs vs. Children’s Lives: Which Side Are You On?
From our friends at Reason.tv : Question: Are lawmakers in Sacramento really putting the interests of the big labor ahead of children’s health?
Original post:
Union Jobs vs. Children’s Lives: Which Side Are You On?
Posted in Hollywood, Hot Stuff, News
Tagged friends, gayle mcclean, interests, libertarians, our-friends, politics, putting-the-interests, really-putting, reason-tv, regulation, sacramento, stars, the-big
CNN continued its promotion of homosexual “marriage” with an online article on Thursday highlighting a new magazine for same-sex couples planning their ceremonies. Writer Shaunte Dunston used glowing language to describe the experiences of “Equally Wed’s” founders, as well as that of vendors who cater to the homosexual community. Dunston, a ” media coordinator ” for the cable network, began her CNN.com article, ” Same-sex bridal magazine born of frustration ,” with a flowery account of Kirsten Ott and Maria Palladino’s ceremony (the two founded “Equally Wed”). The two were the main subjects of the piece: Kirsten Ott walked down the aisle in a white strapless gown with an embroidered bodice and cascading ruffles . Maria Palladino, dressed in a white suit, waited for her at the end of the aisle with a minister. Surrounded by their family and close friends, the women committed to each other for the rest of their lives . A beautiful reception followed. It had all the makings of a traditional wedding , but instead of calling themselves bride and groom, the couple used the terms bride and “broom.” “Broom is a combination of bride and groom,” said Kirsten, who took Maria’s last name when they wed. The “broom’s” cake was a giant crab, Maria’s favorite sea animal. “It was gorgeous and realistic,” Kirsten said. “It actually stole the show from the wedding cake itself.” Both were relieved the special day they had planned for so long finally arrived . The writer didn’t mention when the event took place, but continued that ” organizing a wedding can be challenging , what with finding the right photographer, the perfect cake, the prettiest flowers and, most importantly, the venue. It was even harder for Kirsten, because she had to find vendors who accepted same-sex marriage in Atlanta, Georgia, where the union isn’t legally recognized .” Dunston spent the following six paragraphs quoting extensively from Ott about their apparent difficulties in finding cooperative vendors. In the midst of this, she added that “planning their wedding inspired the newlyweds to start their own wedding magazine geared toward engaged same-sex couples. Kirsten, a journalist, and Maria, a graphic designer, used their career backgrounds and personal experience to launch the online magazine Equally Wed.” Later in the article, the CNN writer cited from one homosexual-friendly vendor who makes rings, as well as from the “Equally Wed” founders, to portray same-sex “marriages” as no different than traditional marriage: Jeweler Rony Tennenbaum in New York designs wedding rings for same-sex couples. “Most of the time they are opposite in the likes and tastes. One might be aggressive, rugged and one wants classier,” Tennenbaum said. Tennenbaum also said it’s important to break same-sex wedding stereotypes . “It’s important not to make rings that a straight person might think a gay couple wants. Gay couples don’t need to wear triangles … it’s not about symbols, it’s about signifying love.”… “That’s kind of why we wanted to do Equally Wed. [It] was to showcase normal gay weddings for anybody that’s planning their own. It helps to have a model to look at, [to] help you feel like what you’re doing is OK,” Kirsten said. Maria said most gay weddings are similar to straight weddings , but there might be a question about which bride will walk down the aisle or which groom will propose. “Just some of the little things that come out in the details of planning.” On August 4, the day that a federal judge struck down California’s Proposition 8 as “unconstitutional,” CNN’s daytime coverage leaned heavily towards supporters of same-sex “marriage,” even going so far as to get immediate reaction from patrons of a “gay” bar in West Hollywood. Two month earlier, the network aired several pro-homosexual agenda segments as part of their promotion for their propagandistic “Gary and Tony Have a Baby” documentary .

Here is the original post:
CNN.com Plugs Same-Sex ‘Marriage’ Magazine ‘Born of Frustration’
Posted in Hollywood, Hot Stuff, News
Tagged bennyhollywood, business coverage, california, Cnn, Hollywood, kirsten ott, mma, newlyweds, News, politics, sale, Sex, whitacre
Unplanned but necessary “improvements,” or induced corrections? I’ll report; readers can decide. My early afternoon post at my home blog dealt with Government/General Motors’ profitability and CEO Ed Whitacre’s “coincidental” step-down from his CEO position. That post originally noted two things that seemed problematic in the Associated Press’s reporting about the company’s plans for an initial public offering this year (the IPO is problematic thanks to Obamanomics , but that’s not the topic here). In the AP’s original report (since revised, which is why it’s saved here at my web host for future reference, fair use and discussion purposes), reporters Tom Krisher and Dee-Ann Durbin, with assistance from Dan Strumpf, reported the following two items in supposedly relaying the results of a discussions with “Scott Sweet, senior managing partner of IPO Boutique in Tampa, Florida, which advises investors on IPOs,” Whitacre, and unnamed government officials (bold is mine): Several recent IPOs have been postponed because of concerns that they won’t get a high enough share price, he said. He also said the Obama administration is pressuring GM to sell prematurely to influence the November congressional elections. Last week, Whitacre said the elections are not being considered, and the government has repeatedly said GM is in charge of the sale timing. My original reactions to the two items in my original post were as follows: (to the assertion about government pressure to sell prematurely) “The AP’s quoted expert also dropped a bombshell — apparently without qualification — that may not survive future AP revisions.” (to the possibly contradictory assertions about who’s controlling the IPO’s timing) “(Whitacre) saying that GM ‘is in charge of the sale timing’ is NOT the same as saying ‘we’re not trying to influence the timing.’” Amazingly, the 4:51 p.m report by the same three reporters, with additional help from Ken Thomas (also saved at my web host , for the same reasons as above), revised — perhaps more accurate terms might be “cleaned up” or “covered the tracks of” — the wire service’s earlier report thusly (bolds are mine): Sweet said the Obama administration may be pressuring GM to sell prematurely to influence the November congressional elections and make the government’s controversial investment look smart. Whitacre and the government have both said GM is in charge of the timing of the IPO. So Sweet went from an unqualified affirmative assertion concerning government interference to a “maybe.” Oh, and now GM and the government are magically saying the same thing about who’s in charge of the IPO’s timing, even though it seems that they weren’t before. As legendary Yankee broadcaster Mel Allen might have said , “How ’bout that!” Or, given the last name of the statement-changing subject matter expert involved, it might be the late Jackie Gleason’s “How Sweet it is!” I’ll leave it to readers to decide whether AP’s version 1 or version 2 is more accurate, and whether version 2 might have been influenced by yours truly’s critique of version 1. If it’s the latter, I would like to formally welcome the AP reporters involved to the self-correcting (or is it track-covering?) mechanism known as the blogosphere. Say hi to Tom Curley & Co. for me, will ya? And while you’re at it, ask him how his war against bloggers, search engines , and the online world in general is going. If it’s the former, readers and commenters are free to speculate on what instigated the changes. Geez, I didn’t even cross-post my initial effort at NewsBusters. But this one has been. Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com .

See more here:
AP Revises Reporting on Government Pressure to Rush GM’s Planned IPO; Why?
Posted in Hollywood, Hot Stuff, News
Tagged business coverage, ed whitacre, Hollywood, jackie-gleason, mma, Obama, politics, sale, search-engines, though-it-seems, TMZ, tom krisher, whitacre
While ABC and NBC ignored a Monday USA Today report that found a significant gap in compensation between public and private sector employees, on Tuesday’s CBS Evening News, correspondent Sharyl Attkisson provided a full story: “While many Americans have suffered pay cuts or job losses, one group is bucking the trend – federal workers.” Attkisson described how the “analysis finds that federal employees have gotten bigger pay and benefit increases than private employees for nine years straight.” She cited numbers from the report: “Federal salaries have grown 33% faster than inflation. Their pay and benefits average $123,000, up 37% since 2000. Private workers average $61,000, up just 8.8% over the same time.” In addition, Attkisson included a sound bite from Cato Institute budget analyst Tad Dehaven: “So you have Wall Street, you have big oil, and now you have federal civilians.” She went to note: “And the bonuses are flowing. CBS News has learned your tax dollars funded $95.8 million in airport security TSA bonuses last year. A $35,000 bonus to the head of the agency.” In concluding her report, Attkisson gave the public sector perspective: “Defenders of federal salaries say they reflect the higher skills and education often required for their jobs and many are paid more because they’ve stuck with their jobs so long.” She added: “President Obama has ordered a freeze on bonuses for 3,000 political appointees and is asking for the smallest pay hike in more than a decade for 2 million other federal workers, 1.4%.” Given that the poor economy, government spending, and the deficit are key issues in the midterm elections, it’s interesting that neither ABC or NBC deemed a story about overpaid government workers to be worthy of coverage. Here is a full transcript of Attkisson’s August 10 report: 6:39PM ET KATIE COURIC: For those fortunate enough to have a job in this tough economy, there’s a growing gap in salary between government employees and those who work in the private sector. More on that now from Sharyl Attkisson. SHARYL ATTKISSON: While many Americans have suffered pay cuts or job losses, one group is bucking the trend – federal workers. A USA Today analysis finds that federal employees have gotten bigger pay and benefit increases than private employees for nine years straight. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: It made me think, man, I should be a federal employee. ATTKISSON: Federal salaries have grown 33% faster than inflation. Their pay and benefits average $123,000, up 37% since 2000. Private workers average $61,000, up just 8.8% over the same time. TAD DEHAVEN [BUDGET ANALYST, CATO INSTITUTE]: So you have Wall Street, you have big oil, and now you have federal civilians. ATTKISSON: And the bonuses are flowing. CBS News has learned your tax dollars funded $95.8 million in airport security TSA bonuses last year. A $35,000 bonus to the head of the agency. UNIDENTIFIED MALE: They’re really overpaid. UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Right now everything should be – should be a freeze across the board until we really get the economy back up and running. ATTKISSON: Federal employees see things differently. UNIDENTIFIED MALE: I definitely don’t think I’m being paid too much. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: I think I’m paid a fair wage, definitely. ATTKISSON: Defenders of federal salaries say they reflect the higher skills and education often required for their jobs and many are paid more because they’ve stuck with their jobs so long. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: I’ve been working for the government 21 years. ATTKISSON: President Obama has ordered a freeze on bonuses for 3,000 political appointees and is asking for the smallest pay hike in more than a decade for 2 million other federal workers, 1.4%. Katie? COURIC: Sharyl Attkisson. Sharyl, thank you very much.

Read this article:
Only CBS Reports on Salary Gap Between Public and Private Employees
Posted in Hollywood, Hot Stuff, News
Tagged bennyhollywood, bonuses, cbs evening news, government agencies, khadr, Nbc, News, Obama, over-the-same, politics, polls, president, revolving door, Street
Via the Right Scoop . Thoughts?
Read this article:
Open Thread: Three Things You Should Know About Islam
Posted in Hollywood, Hot Stuff, News
Tagged celeb news, islam, politics, religion, right-scoop, scoop
Democratic Senator Michael Bennet got his own live spot on Wednesday’s Today show to make his pitch to Colorado voters, but his Republican opponent only got a brief soundbite, that came after a clip of him that put him in a negative, even sexist light. While Today co-anchor Ann Curry chatted live with Bennet in the first half hour, NBC’s Kelly O’Donnell only gave Republican candidate Ken Buck a few seconds in her report on yesterday’s primary races: KELLY O’DONNELL: Winning on the Republican side – career prosecutor Ken Buck who had said this on the trail. KEN BUCK: Why should you vote for me? Because I do not wear high heels. O’DONNELL: Former Lieutenant Governor Jane Norton was the establishment choice, but the Tea Party picked Buck. Do you think of yourself as a Tea Party candidate? BUCK: I think of myself as a grassroots candidate and the Tea Parties are certainly part of that grassroots effort. O’Donnell never gave Buck the chance to explain to the country that his comment/joke came in response to Norton criticism of his candidacy, as he told CBS News’ Bob Orr : “My opponent has said a number of times on the campaign trail that people should vote for her because she wears high heels, because she wears a skirt, because she’s a woman…She ran a commercial that said Ken Buck should be man enough to do X, Y, and Z…I made a statement, it was a lighthearted statement that I’m man enough, I don’t wear high heels and I have cowboy boots on.” By not airing Buck’s clarification and pointing out that the “Tea Party picked Buck,” O’Donnell left Today viewers with the impression that Tea Party voters had just favored the sexist candidate in the race. In contrast Buck’s Democratic opponent in the fall got a full interview segment to make his case to Colorado voters. The following is Curry’s interview with Bennet as it was aired on the August 11 Today show: ANN CURRY: Washington has been keeping an especially close eye on the primary results in Colorado. As we mentioned Democratic Senator Michael Bennet, who had the backing of President Obama, won his party’s primary while setting up a November showdown with Tea Party backed Republican Ken Buck. We’ve got Senator Bennet this morning, joining us this morning. Hello Senator, good morning, and congratulations. [On screen headline: “Rocky Mountain Race, Obama Picks Wins Colorado Senate Primary”] SEN. MICHAEL BENNET: Good morning. Thank you. Thanks for having me today. CURRY: You know, your race fueled this idea that President Obama might not be such an asset on the campaign trail as it, as he was two years ago. Now, this morning after your victory, and it looks like you won pretty handily in looking at the numbers with 100 percent of precincts reporting, you, you won more than a 54 percent of the vote. What do you want to say about President Obama as his, in terms of his being an asset on the campaign trail? BENNET: You know, I’m very pleased to have had his support but I don’t think it made the difference in the primary and won’t make the difference in the general. The content of what I hear in my town hall meetings has never been further away from what we’re hearing on our television sets than it is today. People are focused on how we get out of the most savage economy since the Great Depression. And I think, you know, the politics in Washington and the, and the political conversation we’re hearing on TV these days is not particularly responsive to that and, and we have spoken to that and I think that’s why we were successful in the primary and will be in the general. CURRY: Well so if you’re saying that it wasn’t necessarily what put you over the top, was it, would you have considered it a hindrance? I mean how would you describe the usefulness of President Obama being with you on the campaign trail, in some part, to your campaign? BENNET: I certainly wouldn’t describe it as a hindrance and I also don’t think it made the difference. I don’t think it was material to most primary voters. CURRY: Right. In your victory speech, to the point you were making earlier, you said that, quote, “Washington has a lot to learn from Colorado.” Exactly what do you mean by that, Senator? BENNET: Look we, even before we were in the worst recession since the Great Depression, if you look at the last period of economic growth, it’s the first time in our history that our economy grew and middle class income fell. That’s never happened before. So families in Colorado are earning $1,000 less at the end of the decade than they were at the beginning. The cost of health insurance has gone up by 97 percent. Their cost of higher education has gone up by over 50 percent. People are struggling to figure out how to make sure that we’re not the first generation of Americans to leave less opportunity, not more, to our kids and our grandkids. That’s what people in Colorado are focused on. CURRY: Well alright. I think we’re gonna have to leave that as the last word. There will be a lot of questions, more to come as I’m sure you face this general election. Senator Michael Bennet, thank you so much this morning. BENNET: Thank you. Thanks, thanks for not asking me any wrestling questions. CURRY: Okay. You bet. You can count on that. BENNET: Alright.

Jon Stewart landed both his jokey feet on the Ground Zero Mosque controversy on The Daily Show Tuesday night. He mocked conservatives for having no respect for freedom of religion. This, from Comedy Central ? The network that mocks Jesus and Christians relentlessly, but censors whenever the radical Muslims threaten them ? Yes. Stewart was arguing for the “greatness” of Islam, that it should be accepted with great tolerance as a global religion – regardless of how much tolerance Islam demonstrates for freedom of religion. Stewart mocked conservatives and Republicans. “Haven’t these people ever heard of freedom of religion? Lieutenant Goveror of Tennessee, you wanna take this one?” He ran a hacked-up snippet of GOP Lt. Gov. Ron Ramsey: “I’m all about freedom of religion [edit]…you could argue whether being a Muslim is actually a religion, or is it a nationality way of life, or cult whatever you want to call it.” We’ll get to Stewart’s surgical removal of context later. Stewart made a shocked face, narrowed his eyes, and lectured: “I think religion is what they wanna call it. But point taken. I can see being confused with Scientology, or the thing that Madonna does with the red bracelets, of this whole Justin Bieber craze, certain World Warcraft guilds, Harry Potter book clubs. But I think over 1400 years and over a billion Twitter followers, Islam’s kind of an accepted religion now.” Again, this is a rich line of argument coming from Stewart, whose acidulous attacks on the Roman Catholic Church hardly qualifies as treating Catholicism as an “accepted religion.” Instead, it’s a den of perverts and hypocrites. It’s the “villain” that’s “easy to spot.” Stewart insisted that Islam deserved more respect than Harry Potter or Justin Bieber fan clubs, but unlike certain mosques, those groups haven’t been known to nurture terrorist cells. Then Stewart moved on to mocking Newt Gingrich: “But some people don’t want to be lectured about religious liberty.” He ran a clip of Gingrich saying “I don’t want to be lectued by them about religious liberty when there’s not a single church or a single synaogue in Saudi Arabia.” Stewart took the easy retort: “Why should we as Americans have higher standard of religious liberty than Saudi Arabia! Makes no sense!” The audience applauded. But it is Stewart and the Comedy Central crowd that are the shameless hypocrites about religious liberty. If they really believed in free expression, they might dare to mock radical Muslims instead of cower before them. Now let’s consider how much Fake-News Stewart edited out from Ramsey’s argument. Mediaite printed a fuller transcript (ks it’s all wonderfully wacko. But there’s certainly more substance in here about the Islamic threat to religious liberty than Stewart wanted to allow. It would ruin his perfectly cocky liberal rant. Ramsey said this (Stewart’s edit in bold) about controversy over permits for a mosque proposal in Murfreesboro, Tennessee: Now, I’m all about freedom of religion. I value the First Amendment as much as I value the Second Amendment as much as I value the Tenth Amendment and on and on and on. But you crossed the line when, when they start trying to bring Sharia law here to the state of Tenn, in the United States. We are a law- we live under our Constitution and they live under our Constitution. But it’s scary if we get there. It’s always arguable- and I’ve been studying this issue, but I’ll be right up front with you, like I say until two weeks ago, three weeks ago, nobody ever asked me about this on a governor’s race. And why do you ask about that? Til this mosque started coming in up there. I’ve been trying to learn about Sharia law, I’ve been trying to learn about what going on-, it is not good if that’s what’s going on. Now, you could argue whether being a Muslim is actually a religion, or is it a nationality way of life, or cult whatever you want to call it . But certainly, we do want to protect our religions, but at the same times, this is something that we are gonna to have to face. Right now, though, the most ironic part of what’s happening in Rutherford County is I’m in the real estate business, you want to get something re-zoned, if you want to get something put in, that’s a three-month process. They approved that in 17 days [“mmm” from audience] in Rutherford County. The least they can do is back up, and say, let’s, let’s see what we’re doing over there, (inaudible) 53,000 square foot mosque in the middle of basically a neighborhood and they did it all almost overnight, 5:16. So that has become an issue, and what an issue. I’ve tried to study up on it. But I’ve read enough about Sharia law to know that it’s crazy. When liberal journalists (think Tom Brokaw) tout Jon Stewart as a precious steward of democracy, please remember how he’ll take video clips wildly out of context for a punchline. Tom Brokaw would think that would give bloggers a bad name, but apparently not fake news anchors.

See more here:
Mohammed-Phobic Comedy Central Lectures Conservatives About Religious Liberty? Jon Stewart’s That Shameless
Posted in Hollywood, Hot Stuff, News
Tagged bennyhollywood, celeb news, church, daily, daily-show, Hollywood, jon-stewart, Madonna, muslim, News, politics, really-believed, tenth-amendment
Don’t tell Marco Rubio. Or Quico Canseco. Or Susana Martinez. Or Brian Sandoval. Or these guys . Thoughts?
Read more here:
Open Thread: Harry Reid Thinks ‘Hispanic Republican’ Is an Oxymoron
Posted in Hollywood, Hot Stuff, News
Tagged australian, Breaking News, business, celeb news, cnbc, Hollywood, open thread, politics
Arizona, California, and now, New York City. What the people/voters/citizens want just doesn’t matter any more.

Read more from the original source:
Bad Apple Seed
Posted in Hollywood, Hot Stuff, News
Tagged Breaking News, california, celeb news, citizens-want, Hollywood, Humor, People, politics, stars, the-people