Tag Archives: predecessor

CBS ‘Early Show’: Can Obama Fix ‘Image Problem’ and Bring Back ‘Campaign Magic’?

Opening Saturday’s CBS Early Show, co-host Chris Wragge proclaimed: “Image Problem: The President is on vacation and under fire. From the jobless numbers to the Mosque mess – why is the man with the soaring rhetoric having such a hard time getting his message across?” The headline on screen during the later segment read: “Image Issues; Can Obama’s Team Bring Campaign Magic Back?” Introducing the segment, co-host Rebecca Jarvis referred to “conservative critics” taking issue with President Obama’s vacation time on Martha’s Vineyard. In a report that followed, White House correspondent Chip Reid made sure to parrot administration talking points on the matter: “White House advisers stress that this is a working vacation with numerous daily briefings….White House officials say they’re confident the American people understand that with such a high-pressure job, a President needs and deserves some time to unwind and recharge.” Reid also compared Obama’s time-off with that of his predecessor: “By the end of this trip, President Obama will have taken 9 vacations and visited Camp David 14 times for a total of 80 vacation days since he took office. But at the same point in his first term, President Bush had taken far more time away – 14 trips to his Ranch in Texas and 40 to Camp David. The total, 225 days.” During Obama’s earlier trip to Maine, Reid made the same comparison. Following Reid’s report, Jarvis spoke with conservative radio talk show host Amy Holmes and Jennifer Palmieri of the liberal Center for American Progress. Beginning with Holmes, Jarvis wondered about the President’s “image problem”: “…the President has received some criticism here for the types of vacations he’s been taking….Why do you think the White House is having such a tough time shaping its image right now?” Turning to Palmieri, Jarvis cited various low poll numbers for Obama and raised the possibility of replacing White House staff: “The team from Chicago that put this man in office, Jennifer, does that team need to be replaced at this point in time with the approval so low?” Palmieri dismissed the idea, but Jarvis went back to Holmes and asked: “Why do you think they were able to stay so on point throughout the campaign and now it looks like the administration is really missing the mark?” Holmes replied in part: “President Obama has weighed into such a wide diverse range of issues, most recently the Ground Zero Mosque, that he has muddled his own message about what is it he’s really trying to accomplish.” In her final question to Palmieri, Jarvis pressed: “Why isn’t the Obama administration keeping the focus number one on the jobs picture in this country?” Here is a full transcript of the August 21 segment: 8:00AM TEASE CHRIS WRAGGE: Image Problem: The President is on vacation and under fire. From the jobless numbers to the Mosque mess – why is the man with the soaring rhetoric having such a hard time getting his message across? 8:06AM SEGMENT REBECCA JARVIS: Now to President Obama on vacation for the third time this summer. This is a ten day get away and the others were much shorter but his conservative critics say the trip is sending the wrong message. CBS News chief White House correspondent Chip Reid is traveling with the President in Martha’s Vineyard, Massachusetts. Beautiful scene behind you, Chip, good morning. CHIP REID: It sure is, Rebecca. In fact, critics are saying that the President is spending too much time in places like this, creating an image that’s inappropriate for these difficult economic times. [ON-SCREEN HEADLINE: Image Issues; Is the President Struggling to Stay On Message?]   President Obama in casual clothes browsed at a bookstore on the first full day of his ten-day stay in Martha’s Vineyard. Later, he went off to play golf. But White House advisers stress that this is a working vacation with numerous daily briefings. JOHN BRENNAN [ASSISTANT TO THE PRESIDENT FOR COUNTERTERRORISM & HOMELAND SECURITY]: There are a number of issues that the President is following very, very closely and expects to be kept informed about developments on those issues. REID: The President has come under fire from some conservatives for his vacations this summer, first to Bar Harbor, Maine, last weekend to the Gulf, and for the First Lady’s trip to Spain. Critics say his attention should be on the dire economy and the plight of average Americans. RUSH LIMBAUGH: Yes, he’s been working so hard, he’s tamed the economy, he’s tamed Iraq and the oil spill’s fixed. He plugged the hole and now he gets to go to Martha’s Vineyard. REID: By the end of this trip, President Obama will have taken 9 vacations and visited Camp David 14 times for a total of 80 vacation days since he took office. But at the same point in his first term, President Bush had taken far more time away – 14 trips to his Ranch in Texas and 40 to Camp David. The total, 225 days. Presidents, though, are never truly on vacation. Crises often arise. For example, the Christmas day bomber tried to strike while President Obama was vacationing in Hawaii. And for President Bush, Hurricane Katrina struck the Gulf during a long stay at his Ranch. White House officials say they’re confident the American people understand that with such a high-pressure job, a President needs and deserves some time to unwind and recharge, Rebecca. JARVIS: Thank you, Chip Reid. CBS News’s Chip Reid. So why has it become so hard for the man who ran such a disciplined campaign for President to control his message now and his image in the White House? Joining us is independent conservative Amy Holmes, co-host of America’s Morning News, and Jennifer Palmieri of the Center for American Progress Action Fund, a liberal think tank. Jennifer and Amy, great to see both of you this morning. Thanks for being with us. AMY HOLMES: Good morning. JENNIFER PALMIERI: Good morning. [ON-SCREEN HEADLINE: Image Issues; Can Obama’s Team Bring Campaign Magic Back?]                  JARVIS: And, Amy, let’s start out with you, because obviously the President has received some criticism here for the types of vacations he’s been taking, he spent a day visiting the Gulf and now he’s spending ten days in Martha’s Vineyard. His wife, Michelle, visited Spain in the midst of this economic crisis. Why do you think the White House is having such a tough time shaping its image right now? HOLMES: Well, they’re having a tough time because they’re having a tough economic time. But count me among the conservatives that does not begrudge our Presidents their vacations. In fact, I wish politicians spent more time outside of the beltway, less time in Washington, and being really in touch with the American people. Martha’s Vineyard, maybe not exactly in touch, maybe he should be in a camper, I’d like to see that. But, I’m not one of the people that’s actually attacking the President on taking some downtime. JARVIS: A lot of people, though, however are thinking that the President is falling short, his approval ratings have dropped this last week, Jennifer. Across the board, we saw a number of approval ratings that were particularly weak, the Associated Press, 49%, Time, 46%, the Gallup poll, only 42% approve of the President. The team from Chicago that put this man in office, Jennifer, does that team need to be replaced at this point in time with the approval so low? PALMIERI: No, I don’t – I think that the – that the team from Chicago has been dealt a very difficult hand and they’re doing just fine. But the – President Obama’s approval ratings are certainly lower than they have been in the past, but is worth noting that they’re higher than President Clinton’s approval ratings were in 1994 at the same time and even higher than President Reagan’s approval ratings were in 1982 at this same time. And the – I think the Reagan and the Obama situation are sort of – are good comparisons, because Reagan, also, had inherited a very difficult economy. And, you know, the Presidents had a lot of legislative victories, but the White House understands very clearly that you don’t get points from the American people just for legislative victories. They want to see results. And the uncomfortable truth that the White House is wrestling with is that a lot of these policies that they’ve enacted take time for people to see results in their everyday lives and I think, you know, the economy used to shed 600,000 jobs a month when Obama took office. Their adding jobs now each month, not as many as they’d like, but the economy is slowly recovering. But, they understand that there’s a frustration that exists until people see these changes really take effect and that’s just going to take some time. JARVIS: Amy, why do you think they were able to stay so on point throughout the campaign and now it looks like the administration is really missing the mark? HOLMES: Well, there’s a big difference between campaigning and governing and when you’re campaigning, you can stay on message with that close team from Chicago, you know, hope and change. But once you get into government, you’re actually dealing with this – panap- JARVIS: Panoply. HOLMES: This huge array – panoply, thank you – this huge array of issues. And where I think I might disagree with Jennifer in terms of the Obama-Reagan comparison, is that Obama came in with much higher approval. So his fall-off, the drop-off has been much more dramatic than what Ronald Reagan faced and I think also President Obama has weighed into such a wide diverse range of issues, most recently the Ground Zero Mosque, that he has muddled his own message about what is it he’s really trying to accomplish. So we can also look at his policies, even Barney Frank, the liberal from Massachusetts, said that it was quote-unquote ‘dumb’ of this administration to promise that their stimulus bill would keep unemployment below 8%, we’re at 9.5. So he see – the Democratic Party itself is sort of like shooting within the circle when it comes to their own message and this President and they have advisers telling them this fall run, do not walk, away from President Obama. JARVIS: Jennifer, isn’t everybody in this country worried about jobs, why isn’t the Obama administration keeping the focus number one on the jobs picture in this country? PALMIERI: Well, I think that when you see when the President gets out in the country, as he does probably a couple of days a week, that is what he’s – that is what he’s talking about. And they have taken a lot of steps in the beginning of the administration to stabilize the economy and I think that the reason why you don’t see his approval ratings falling off worse is because people understand that he did bring us back from the brink of a depression. And they also understand, and the polling reflects this, that it takes more than 18 months to get out of as a big of a hole as we did have in economy. So I think that people are frustrated but they do understand that why this is so difficult for the President to get out of. JARVIS: Jennifer Palmieri, Amy Holmes, thanks so much to both of you for being with us. PALMIERI: Thank you, Rebecca. HOLMES: Thank you.

See more here:
CBS ‘Early Show’: Can Obama Fix ‘Image Problem’ and Bring Back ‘Campaign Magic’?

On civil liberties, Obama is worse than Bush

Last week it was reported that the Obama Administration wants to give the FBI power to force internet companies to reveal information about their users' internet activities: things like who they send email to, times and dates of emails, and maybe also information about their web browser activity. Even worse, they want the FBI to be able to demand this information without a warrant! President Obama is racking up an atrocious record on civil liberties and the Fourth Amendment. When he campaigned, he talked a lot about civil liberties. But when he got elected, he made an about-face and started expanding the abusive policies of the Bush Administration. For example, his Justice Department claimed that “state secrets” doctrine started by Bush gave the government even more secrecy powers than Bush had claimed! And earlier this year, the president signed a bill re-authorizing even the most abusive parts of the PATRIOT Act. It seems that Obama has lots of respect for government power, and little or no respect for the rights of the people. Just like his predecessor. Democrats and Republicans are cooperating to grow the power of government and trample on our rights. Please support the Libertarian Party and Libertarian candidates this year. We are the only real opposition. _______________________________________________ I find it strange all the civil liberty activists are quiet now that a Democrat was elected. added by: libertyforall

Rockies lose Tulowitzki to injured hand (AP)

Colorado Rockies shortstop Troy Tulowitzki left the game against Minnesota on Thursday in the eighth inning after getting hit by a pitch on his left hand. Tulowitzki was in visible pain after being hit by reliever Alex Burnett and received attention from Rockies trainers. He remained in the game on the bases, but was pulled when the defense took the field in the bottom of the inning.

Read the rest here:
Rockies lose Tulowitzki to injured hand (AP)

Obama Speaks At Lower Grade Level Than Bush, CNN Says He’s ‘Too Professorial’

You know why President Obama’s Gulf Coast oil spill address from the Oval Office failed so miserably on Tuesday? It went over too many heads. At least that’s what the folks at CNN.com believe. Maybe that’s why the so-called geniuses at MSNBC didn’t like it – it went over Keith Olbermann, Chris Matthews, and Howard Fineman’s heads! Even more absurd in this piece  by the CNN Wire Staff is that it completely ignored how Obama’s speech patterns when he addresses the nation are at a lower grade level than those of George W. Bush (h/t Lachlan Markay): Tuesday night’s speech from the Oval Office of the White House was written to a 9.8 grade level, said Paul J.J. Payack, president of Global Language Monitor. The Austin, Texas-based company analyzes and catalogues trends in word usage and word choice and their impact on culture. Though the president used slightly less than four sentences per paragraph, his 19.8 words per sentence “added some difficulty for his target audience,” Payack said. At a micro level, the average word in the speech contained 4.5 letters, a bit longer than is typical for the former constitutional law professor, Payack said. Obama’s nearly 10th-grade-level rating was the highest of any of his major speeches and well above the Grade 7.4 of his 2008 “Yes, we can” victory speech, which many consider his best effort, Payack said. Got that? The supposedly smartest president in history on Tuesday night was speaking at less than a 10th-grade level. But that was TOO complicated for the television audience to understand. This genius is FAR MORE effective when he speaks like a 7th-grader! Yet George W. Bush was an idiot, right? Apparently not according to an analysis published at Smart Politics on January 29, 2009, after Obama’s first State of the Union address: Text of Obama’s Address has a readability score for an average 8th grader – two grades lower than George W. Bush’s Addresses and the historical average for modern presidents.  Shhh. Wait. It gets MUCH better:  Unlike the criticisms hurled at his predecessor, however, few have ever charged that the President, a former senior lecturer in Constitutional law at the University of Chicago Law School, has written or spoken too simplistically or catered his words to the lowest common denominator. However, a Smart Politics analysis of nearly 70 oral State of the Union Addresses since the mid-1930s finds the text of Obama’s speech on Wednesday evening to have one of the lowest scores on the Flesch-Kincaid readability test ever recorded by a U.S. President. The Flesch-Kincaid test is designed to assess the readability level of written text, with a formula that translates the score to a U.S. grade level. Longer sentences and sentences utilizing words with more syllables produce higher scores. Shorter sentences and sentences incorporating more monosyllabic words yield lower scores. Smart Politics ran the Flesch-Kincaid test on each of the last 68 State of the Union Addresses that were delivered orally by presidents before a Joint Session of Congress since Franklin Roosevelt. Excluded from analysis were five written addresses (Truman in 1946 and 1953, Eisenhower in 1961, Nixon in 1973, and Carter in 1981) and two addresses that were delivered orally, but not by the President himself (Roosevelt in 1945, Eisenhower in 1956). Prior to FDR, most, but not all, such Addresses were delivered in writing. Obama’s Flesch-Kincaid grade level score of 8.8 for his first State of the Union Address was the fourth lowest score since FDR’s first Address in 1934. What this means is that Obama wrote and delivered a speech that incorporated shorter sentences, with those sentences containing shorter words, than nearly every such Presidential Address in the modern era.   Remember: he’s supposedly the smartest president in history! So now see how he compares to the so-called idiot he replaced:  As such, the speech by ‘the professor’ stands in contrast to his predecessor, ‘the cowboy,’ George W. Bush, who was frequently skewered by the left and late-night talk show hosts for his public speaking abilities, his intelligence, and his misuse of the English language. Bush averaged a Flesch-Kincaid score of 10.4 across his seven State of the Union Addresses – or nearly two full grades higher than Obama’s speech. Bush’s speeches also averaged 2.4 more words per sentence than Obama, at 19.0. In other words, the text of George W. Bush’s speeches are expected to be understandable (in written form) by an average sophomore in high school, whereas Obama’s speech should be understandable by a junior high school student. Interestingly, George W. Bush’s 10.4 Flesch-Kincaid score was also higher than several of his predecessors, including Ronald Reagan (10.3), Bill Clinton (9.5), and his father George H.W. Bush (8.6). Still, it is, at the very least, interesting that ‘the professor’ should write and deliver a speech that has a readability level two grades lower than those crafted and delivered by ‘the cowboy.’ Interesting indeed. Yet despite speaking to the nation at a higher grade level than Obama does — and did on Tuesday! — Dubya was certainly never “accused” of being too professorial. Facts really are a stupid thing as are the depths liberal media members will sink to explain why this president is failing so miserably.

Read more from the original source:
Obama Speaks At Lower Grade Level Than Bush, CNN Says He’s ‘Too Professorial’

Meet the Generation That Will Save or Destroy the New York Times [Dynasties]

The only way the New York Times can escape the clutches of a Mexican billionaire is by successfully instituting a paywall. Who has it chosen to manage this treacherous path? The publisher’s nephew. He used to run a DJ school. The Times is a publicly traded company, but the heirs of its modern founder Adolph Ochs and his son-in-law, Arthur Hays Sulzberger, own the voting shares. And in an effort to inculcate all the far-flung cousins—there are 27 fifth-generation descendants of Sulzberger—with a sense of responsibility for the newspaper and its various holdings, the New York Times Company likes to rotate them through the place from time to time. The company’s latest proxy statement , released earlier this week, brought news of yet two more Sulzberger cousins signing up for duty at the mother ship—in this job market, no less! And one of them was particularly momentous: Thirty-three-year-old David Perpich , nephew to Times publisher Arthur “Pinch” Sulzberger Jr., who is himself son to his predecessor Arthur “Punch” Sulzberger, who was himself son to his predecessor Arthur Hays Sulzberger, has been hired as the executive director of paid products at NYTimes.com just as the site prepares to wring desperately needed money out of its 17 million monthly users by limiting the number of stories they can read without subscribing . So here’s a handy guide to what Perpich—as well as his various kinsman and -women spread throughout the New York Times Company—brings to the table. David Perpich, 33, fifth generation Perpich’s claim to fame is his role in helping run the Scratch DJ Academy, a rigorous institution of higher learning co-founded by Jam Master Jay that offers an ” incredible opportunity for amateur and aspiring music enthusiasts to learn how to DJ, from mixing and blending, to scratching and beat juggling .” Among Perpich’s duties at the Academy was “handling all marketing initiatives,” and he was really good at it: He managed to get the school mentioned a whopping nine times in the paper his family owns ! After leaving academia around 2007, according to this excellent 2008 New York rundown of the Sulzberger clan , Perpich briefly entertained an offer to join the family business, but he turned it down in favor of a technology consulting gig at Booz Allen. For whatever reason, that didn’t work out, so he figured he’d head over to his uncle’s shop and shepherd the most crucial business initiative that the Times has ever undertaken. He’s up for it, though: He’s a digital wizard who’s thoroughly mastered Twitter , having limited his posts to one heartbreaking online memorial for Michael Jackson made all the more moving by its singularity: Samuel Dolnick , 30, fifth generation Also reported in the most recent proxy statement was the hiring of Samuel Dolnick, the grandson of Arthur Sulzberger’s sister Ruth Holmberg (who herself served as the publisher of the Chattanooga Times ). Dolnick, who previously toiled as a reporter for the Associated Press, was hired at the Newspaper Guild Minimum staff reporter’s salary of $90,500 in September, and has been writing for the Metro desk. According to the New York Observer , Dolnick is no dilettante: His AP gig took him to New Delhi, and before that, he interned at the Village Voice under the estimable Wayne Barrett. He’s settled down in New York for the new gig, having just purchased a home in Brooklyn with a $300,000 mortgage at the discount-window interest rate of .57% from his grandmother, according to New York real estate records. A. G. Sulzberger, 30, fifth generation Arthur G. Sulzberger, Pinch’s son, joined the paper last March, also at the Guild minimum salary, and since then he’s been cold huntin’ snipers , writing about bus stops and light bulbs for the Metro desk, and fending off obscene propositions from Gawker readers . Before that he wrote for the Portland Oregonian . Rachel B. Golden, 31, fifth generation Rachel is the daughter of Michael Golden , Holmberg’s son and vice chairman of the Times Company. She makes a cool $82,136 as a marketing associate for the Times web site, where she’s responsible for promoting the Style, T, and Travel sections . James Dryfoos , 45, fifth generation Dryfoos, the grandson of Arthur Sulzberger’s sister Marian, is a systems analyst for the Times Company, where he analyzes systems for $144,673 a year. He married a lady named Reagan Rexrode and is a homebrew enthusiast . Michael Greenspon , 40, fifth generation Also a grandson of Marian’s, Greenspon is, according to New York , “quietly competent but not an obvious candidate to lead the paper.” He’s a project manager in strategic planning and served last year as the interem general manager of the New York Times News Service, which laid of some 25 to 30 people in November . He makes $176,961 a year. Michael Golden, 61, fourth generation Golden, father to Rachel and son of Ruth, is Arthur Sulzberger Jr.’s chief rival in the family. He’s currently vice chairman after a stint in Paris as the publisher of the International Herald Tribune , which the Times Company wrestled away from the Washington Post Company in 2002. Golden shepherded the company’s move from its old Times Square headquarters to a bright shiny new $500 million building, which worked out like this: The old building was flipped at a $350 million profit three years after the Times sold it, and the Times started selling off pieces of the new building for cash two years after it was built . For this he made $1.8 million last year. Arthur O. Sulzberger, Jr., 59 Arthur is the publisher of the New York Times . He makes $5.1 million, and is primarily occupied with insuring that none of the aforementioned fifth-generation Sulzbergers have jobs in five years. SPECIAL BONUS HIDDEN SULZBERGER: New York ‘s look at the Sulzberger clan noted that a “spokesperson for the Times said there are two additional fifth-generation descendents, but they have never appeared as beneficiaries in the company’s SEC filings.” We’ve found one of them: In addition to providing a mortgage to Dolnick, Holmberg is also listed in New York real estate records as having made a $265,000 loan to a Sharon Skettini of Brooklyn. And according to public databases, Skettini once shared an address in Arizona with Ruth’s son Stephen Golden, a lawyer in Tucson. Skettini appears to have once been employed as a literary agent for Sterling Lord Literistic , a New York agency, but she’s not currently listed on the firm’s site. She doesn’t appear to have any public relationship with the Times .

More:
Meet the Generation That Will Save or Destroy the New York Times [Dynasties]

Anchorage Mayor Dan Sullivan learned much from his idol Sarah Palin.

(This picture was undoubtedly taken after Sullivan brags to Sarah that someday he will outdo her when it comes to ripping off the people of Alaska. Sullivan is on the left. Picture courtesy of AKM.) As incredible as it may seem, before there was a Mayor Dan Sullivan, there was a Mayor George Sullivan (Yes I know the people of Anchorage are slow learners!) And in 1982 the city, in it’s infinite wisdom, decided to provide George Sullivan with a life insurance policy. On Jan. 19, 1982, about two weeks after he left office, the Assembly passed a resolution thanking Sullivan “for the many outstanding contributions he made to the general well-being of the citizens of the Municipality of Anchorage during his years of public service.” The resolution asked the city’s Commission on Salaries and Emoluments to consider granting him life insurance coverage for the rest of his life, with the same rate for the same coverage he had as mayor. Sullivan was considered a city employee until the end of October 1982, when his accrued hours of leave ran out. Now THIS was highly unusual. In fact it had NEVER happened before, or since. However the decision was made and for the last 27 years the Sullivan family has been paying for this insurance. Except that the premiums that were paid did NOT go to an insurance company. Instead it went into a city account. Twenty years later, in 2002, Deputy Employee Relations director Karen Moore was baffled when Dan Sullivan, who was on the Assembly at the time, came to the city to make that year’s premium payment, according to e-mails from the time. She asked the city’s insurance carrier about a policy for Sullivan. The company didn’t know about it either. The premiums paid by Sullivan and his family had been deposited into a city account, not given to Aetna. The city, then headed by Mayor George Wuerch, talked about buying a real insurance policy for the elder Sullivan but Aetna would not cover him since he was no longer a city employee and suggested that the city simply return the money to the family. Well the city did not do that, they did this instead. The city finance director at the time, Kate Giard, told fellow city officials they could put an end to it by just telling the Sullivan family the city would no longer provide the insurance. Giard said another option was for the city to try to buy a life insurance policy for the former mayor, but she suggested that would likely be too expensive because of his age. She suggested the city put $193,000 into a reserve account , the coverage amount that was described in a 1982 memo, then pay it out to the family when George Sullivan died. Last year ex-Mayor George Sullivan did indeed pass away. And just last week the Anchorage Assembly voted to pay this $193,000 of our city’s money to George Sullivan’s survivors. And can you guess who the beneficiary of this bizarre, city provided, pseudo life insurance payout might be? That’s right, none other than current creepy Mayor Dan Sullivan, George’s much less capable offspring. You remember Danny boy don’t you? Here let me refresh your memory. Yeah THAT Mayor Dan Sullivan! So now thanks to a vote by our current assembly and some very strange shenanigans by the 1982 Assembly Mayor Dan Sullivan suddenly became $193,000 richer and our fair city became $193,000 poorer. How is that for justice? And just to make matters much, much worse, our current Mayor Sullivan has been cutting, or attempting to cut, essential services in the city ever since he took office because, in his own words, “Anchorage’s economy is in a delicate balance.” So delicate in fact that Sullivan attempted to cut $174,000 from the city budget, part of which would have gone to fund our libraries and arts programs. So delicate that he vetoed 3.2 million to build a storm drainage system for downtown and $250,000 for a new ambulance. The economy in Anchorage is so delicate that just last month Mayor Sullivan saved the city $150,000 by disbanding the Anchorage Fire Department’s wilderness rescue team and cutting back some other specially trained teams like divers. For God’s sake this is Anchorage freaking Alaska! Every year we have a dozen or so people fall off of a mountain, get stuck in the mudflats, get attacked by a bear, fall overboard, get lost in the wilderness, or succumb to the elements. When it comes to “essential city services”, this certainly applies. But hey, if the city does not have the money then what are you going to do? Except that the city, whose economy is in a “delicate balance”, apparently has plenty of money when it needs to hand Dan Sullivan a big fat check for $193,000 dollars now doesn’t it? I wonder how many books that would buy? Or how many lives it might save? Or how many other necessary city projects it might help to fund? There was only one dissenting vote on the Assembly which voted to give Danny this money, and that came from the always ethical Harriet Drummond. “If there were enough (Assembly members) who realized this was stupidity and voted no, then Anchorage’s taxpayers would still have $200,000 in the bank,” Drummond said later. “And the Sullivan estate could have gotten the $20,000 in premiums back. Maybe that was the appropriate thing to do. But it was certainly not appropriate for the city to be acting as an insurance company, which it is not.” And before you think I am being too unfair to little Danny Sullivan let me remind you that he is the same guy who charged the city $12,115.20 for a period of time BEFORE he physically took office, simply because he could. The fact that other mayors, including his predecessor and nemesis Mark Begich, had chosen not to take the money not bother him at all. Dan Sullivan clearly views the job of mayor as a stepping stone to higher office and an opportunity to grab as much cash as possible, and cares not one little bit about the people who elected him or who need him to run their city effectively. I am sure Sullivan would have felt quite at home with his grifter role model Sarah Palin and her ” swarm of locusts “.

See more here:
Anchorage Mayor Dan Sullivan learned much from his idol Sarah Palin.

New Royals Mascot — Expert Wiener Handler

Filed under: TMZ Sports The Kansas City Royals have selected the next person to play Sluggerrr the mascot — and TMZ has learned the super fan is training hard to avoid the same wiener-related drama that’s plaguing his predecessor. The man donning the lion costume is Rob … Permalink

Original post:
New Royals Mascot — Expert Wiener Handler

The Brothers Blankfein

According to Business Insider, Lloyd Blankfein’s son Jonathan is about to land a job he totally earned at Goldman Sachs . And we hear that his brother Alex is also on the Goldman Sachs payroll. Bootstraps! Jonathan Blankfein, who Business Insider hears is just “a stand-up guy,” graduates from Harvard this year, at which point he’ll join Goldman Sachs, which is father Lloyd runs, as an analyst

See the rest here:
The Brothers Blankfein

Conan O’Brien Addresses People Of Earth

Conan O’Brien wants nothing to do with the “destruction” of ” The Tonight Show “, claiming that move will ruin the show’s legacy.

Statement: Conan O’Brien Won’t Do a Tonight Show after Midnight

Conan O’Brien has finally said “enough.” The Tonight Show host is abandoning his gig rather than move it to midnight. O’Brien’s blunt statement reflects months of being jerked around at NBC. First came the surprise news of former Tonight Show host Jay Leno ‘s 10pm show, meaning O’Brien would continue to follow his predecessor in NBC’s nighttime lineup.

Go here to see the original:
Statement: Conan O’Brien Won’t Do a Tonight Show after Midnight