Tag Archives: president-obama

In the Gulf, We Need Action, Not Finger-pointing

I believe the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico is the fault and responsibility of British Petroleum, and I believe they should be held accountable and made to pay for stopping the leak, cleaning up the water, beaches and wetlands, even if it takes every cent the company makes for the next ten years. I believe that they should be sued by the feds, the state government and the families who are suffering from the millions of gallons of crude oil that’s not only poisoning their waters but also threatening their very way of life. And having said that, I want to say this. Now is not the time for lawsuits, finger pointing, meaningless meetings and bureaucratic BS. Now is the time for action and all energy should be focused on getting the spill stopped and the mess cleaned up. Eric Holder’s presence on the Gulf Coast is about as useless as mammary glands on a boar hog. The time will come for lawsuits and plenty of them, but right now anything that distracts from fixing the catastrophe in the Gulf should be put on the back burner. If Holder wants to do something useful he should investigate the Sestak situation. Fat chance of that. And if President Obama wants to do something useful he should cut through the bureaucratic red tape that seems to throw a roadblock in the way of anything anybody wants to do to remedy the situation. Governor Bobby Jindal has been screaming for weeks that he needs containment equipment, and he wants to dredge sand and build some barriers to stop the oil slick before it gets on shore. He has been denied his request by the government. They say it’s because there has not been an environmental study done as to what the effects would be. The truth of the matter is that by the time the lethargic Obama Administration gets around to doing something meaningful there may not be an environment to protect on the Louisiana coast. Obama’s policy seems to be, do nothing and let nobody else do anything. People, can you imagine what would happen if America was to have a major terrorist attack. Would there have to be an environmental study before we respond or would Obama send Holder to sue the terrorists. Oh I forgot, he doesn’t sue terrorists, he defends them. Besides, it would probably be George Bush’s fault anyway. This country is leaderless. The incompetency of the Obama Administration is putting this nation in terrific and immediate danger. Somewhere on this planet there is someone who knows how to stop this leak. It may not be a politically correct method and it may not be something Obama can take credit for but there is a way to do it and the federal government should put away politics. Swallow their pride and put out the call for help. People of the Gulf Coast please know that my heart is with you, my prayers are for you and I know what kind of people you are. You’ll never give up. I only wish you could get some sensible help from the government you pay taxes to.

See the rest here:
In the Gulf, We Need Action, Not Finger-pointing

Unlike With Katrina, Media Stay Away from Gulf Spill Competency Questions

The mainstream media seem to have boiled down the president’s reaction to the Gulf spill to two caricatures: either he has failed to satiate public appetites by feigning outrage, or he is succeeding by acting angry. Whereas journalists rightly expected President Bush to do something about Katrina–and excoriated him when he supposedly didn’t do enough–the media seem content listening to Obama speak. That the president may not be doing everything in his power, like, say, meeting with the CEO of British Petroleum , seems not even to cross their minds. So the only critique of the president that remains is one of style. By focusing on what the president has said–rather than what he has done–and how he has said it, the media have diverted (albeit unintentionally) attention from the administration’s actual response to the spill to its emotional and verbal response. Obama and his predecessor both accepted responsibility for the spill and Hurricane Katrina, respectively. But the mainstream press took the former at his word; they rightfully held him accountable for his administration’s actions. No such accountability is present in the media’s reporting on Obama’s response to the Gulf spill. “I as president am responsible for the problem, and for the solution,” Bush stated. Obama echoed this sentiment late last month, when he said, “I take responsibility. It is my job to make sure that everything is done to shut this down.” Now contrast, by way of example, the two New York Times headlines covering the respective admissions of responsibility. “Responding to Spill, Obama Mixes Regret With Resolve,” the Times’s editors wrote on May 27. That tone stands in stark contrast to this headline , from September 16, 2005: “Bush admits Katrina response was inadequate”. The Times captured the spirit of the media’s coverage. In Bush’s case, the concern was with what had and had not been done. But today the same journalists seem more concerned with what the White House is saying about the spill than with what it is doing about it. Some, such as MSNBC’s Norah O’Donnell, have even bemoaned how badly the administration feels about the situation. White House staffers are apparently having nightmares in between beer pong games . If Obama hasn’t succeeded at solving a problem, the media narrative goes, it is because the problem cannot be solved, not because he has failed in any way. After all, he caaaares . After the president claimed he was looking for “whose ass to kick” in an interview with Matt Lauer on Monday, the media seized on the statement as a tangible example not just of the president’s new commitment to mitigating the disaster, but even as an example of his hands-on attitude towards the spill. NewsBusters reported Tuesday on network TV journos going gaga over the president’s newfound combativeness. “In a TV interview aired today, the President said if BP’s CEO worked for him, he’d be fired,” stated Katie Couric. So Couric parroted the president saying what he would do in a hypothetical situation with a person with whom he has not actually met in the 50 days since the spill began. Obama’s kick-ass quote or his hypothetical threats against Tony Hayward have been touted as proof that the president is responding to the public demands that he do domething about the spill. But Obama still has not done much of anything. That fact seems lost on the media. So readers are left shaking their heads when the Atlantic’s Marc Ambinder says this : The American Prospect’s Adam Serwer notes today, “One of the things I used to like about the president is that he always seemed indifferent to village demands that he acquiesce to whatever empty political gesture they wanted him to make.” Well, Serwer can relax. President Obama did not conjure up the posterior metaphor on his own. He turned Matt Lauer’s “butt” into an “ass,” and his annoyance seemed to be more a consequence of Lauer’s questions than of any effort to appear angry.    Appearing angry and appearing engaged are two different things. The White House understands how anger can be appropriately channeled and employed, but at this point, they are eager for the public to see the president as engaged — as problem solving. If President Obama hadn’t said “ass,” then he’d be accused of not being angry enough. Because he did say “ass,” he’s accused of titrating his response to criticisms that he’s not angry enough about the oil leak. The man cannot win. Well yes, as Ace notes , “he can win — he can do something about the oil slick.” Not just talk about it or “strike the right emotional notes,” but actually do something about it, something tangible, something real, something with real-world impact. That’s how he “wins,” dude. And that, I’m sad to report, is the only way he wins. But for media personalities so used to covering a president whose tongue won him the White House, talking has supplanted action. Obama talking is Obama acting. Hence before the president’s kick-ass moment, the public’s sour mood towards the Gulf spill response was due to Obama’s failure to adequately communicate how well he has been doing. Now that he has succeeded in communicating, the narrative goes, he has simply succeeded. Why anyone would continue to deny him credit accordingly is completely lost on these pundits. Ace hits the nail on the head: So, that’s what we have going on. We are allowed two permissible storylines — Obama’s not emoting enough, or Obama’s emoting just enough — and the MFM won’t entertain other storylines, like, “This has nothing at all to do with emoting, but rather to do with reality and real-world achievements.”

Originally posted here:
Unlike With Katrina, Media Stay Away from Gulf Spill Competency Questions

Media Hype Obama’s H.S. Commencement Speech — But Ignore That Students Had to Show Papers

In the middle of a typical Full House rerun on Teen Nick this morning, the network ran a 90-second promo for their website Get Schooled.com  promoting Barack Obama, and how students at Kalamazoo Central High School were overjoyed and amazed to meet him. Students hugged and yelled and held their hands out like they’d never touch anything again after meeting Obama.  Greg Pollowitz at NRO’s Media Blog reported there was an overlooked, inconvenient fact in the hoopla over Kalamazoo Central students meeting the president. The Secret Service required each student’s citizenship status : KALAMAZOO — The White House appears to be laying the groundwork for President Barack Obama to shake the hand of each senior at Kalamazoo Central High School’s commencement ceremony next month. Seniors are being asked to provide their birthdates, Social Security numbers and citizen status to the Secret Service so background checks could be performed. Such a check is required for anyone who gets within an arm’s length of the president, students were told at their senior breakfast Friday. Pollowitz asked: “What’s good enough for President Obama should be good enough for Arizona, no?”

View post:
Media Hype Obama’s H.S. Commencement Speech — But Ignore That Students Had to Show Papers

The Christian Fascists Are Growing Stronger

Tens of millions of Americans, lumped into a diffuse and fractious movement known as the Christian right, have begun to dismantle the intellectual and scientific rigor of the Enlightenment. They are creating a theocratic state based on “biblical law,” and shutting out all those they define as the enemy. This movement, veering closer and closer to traditional fascism, seeks to force a recalcitrant world to submit before an imperial America. It champions the eradication of social deviants, beginning with homosexuals, and moving on to immigrants, secular humanists, feminists, Jews, Muslims and those they dismiss as “nominal Christians”—meaning Christians who do not embrace their perverted and heretical interpretation of the Bible. Those who defy the mass movement are condemned as posing a threat to the health and hygiene of the country and the family. All will be purged. The followers of deviant faiths, from Judaism to Islam, must be converted or repressed. The deviant media, the deviant public schools, the deviant entertainment industry, the deviant secular humanist government and judiciary and the deviant churches will be reformed or closed. There will be a relentless promotion of Christian “values,” already under way on Christian radio and television and in Christian schools, as information and facts are replaced with overt forms of indoctrination. The march toward this terrifying dystopia has begun. It is taking place on the streets of Arizona, on cable news channels, at tea party rallies, in the Texas public schools, among militia members and within a Republican Party that is being hijacked by this lunatic fringe. Elizabeth Dilling, who wrote “The Red Network” and was a Nazi sympathizer, is touted as required reading by trash-talk television hosts like Glenn Beck. Thomas Jefferson, who favored separation of church and state, is ignored in Christian schools and soon will be ignored in Texas public school textbooks. The Christian right hails the “significant contributions” of the Confederacy. Sen. Joseph McCarthy, who led the anti-communist witch hunts of the 1950s, has been rehabilitated, and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is defined as part of the worldwide battle against Islamic terror. Legislation like the new Jim Crow laws of Arizona is being considered by 17 other states. The rise of this Christian fascism, a rise we ignore at our peril, is being fueled by an ineffectual and bankrupt liberal class that has proved to be unable to roll back surging unemployment, protect us from speculators on Wall Street, or save our dispossessed working class from foreclosures, bankruptcies and misery. The liberal class has proved useless in combating the largest environmental disaster in our history, ending costly and futile imperial wars or stopping the corporate plundering of the nation. And the gutlessness of the liberal class has left it, and the values it represents, reviled and hated. The Democrats have refused to repeal the gross violations of international and domestic law codified by the Bush administration. This means that Christian fascists who achieve power will have the “legal” tools to spy on, arrest, deny habeas corpus to, and torture or assassinate American citizens—as does the Obama administration. Those who remain in a reality-based world often dismiss these malcontents as buffoons and simpletons. They do not take seriously those, like Beck, who pander to the primitive yearnings for vengeance, new glory and moral renewal. Critics of the movement continue to employ the tools of reason, research and fact to challenge the absurdities propagated by creationists who think they will float naked into the heavens when Jesus returns to Earth. The magical thinking, the flagrant distortion in interpreting the Bible, the contradictions that abound within the movement’s belief system and the laughable pseudoscience, however, are impervious to reason. We cannot convince those in the movement to wake up. It is we who are asleep. Those who embrace this movement see life as an epic battle against forces of evil and Satanism. The world is black and white. They need to feel, even if they are not, that they are victims surrounded by dark and sinister groups bent on their destruction. They need to believe they know the will of God and can fulfill it, especially through violence. They need to sanctify their rage, a rage that lies at the core of the ideology. They seek total cultural and political domination. They are using the space within the open society to destroy it. These movements work within the confining rules of the secular state because they have no choice. The intolerance they promote is muted in the public assurances of their slickest operators. Given enough power, and they are working hard to get it, any such cooperation will vanish. The demand for total control and for a Christian nation and the refusal to permit any dissent are on display within their inner sanctums. These pastors have established within their churches tiny, despotic fiefdoms, and they seek to replicate these little tyrannies on a larger scale. Many of the tens of millions within the Christian right live on the edge of poverty. The Bible, interpreted for them by pastors whose connection with God means they cannot be questioned, is their handbook for daily life. The rigidity and simplicity of their belief are potent weapons in the fight against their own demons and the struggle to keep their lives on track. The reality-based world, one where Satan, miracles, destiny, angels and magic did not exist, battered them like driftwood. It took their jobs and destroyed their future. It rotted their communities. It flooded their lives with alcohol, drugs, physical violence, deprivation and despair. And then they discovered that God has a plan for them. God will save them. God intervenes in their lives to promote and protect them. The emotional distance they have traveled from the real world to the world of Christian fantasy is immense. And the rational, secular forces, those that speak in the language of fact and evidence, are hated and ultimately feared, for they seek to pull believers back into “the culture of death” that nearly destroyed them. There are wild contradictions within this belief system. Personal independence is celebrated alongside an abject subservience to leaders who claim to speak for God. The movement says it defends the sanctity of life and advocates the death penalty, militarism, war and righteous genocide. It speaks of love and promotes fear of damnation and hate. There is a terrifying cognitive dissonance in every word they utter. The movement is, for many, an emotional life raft. It is all that holds them together. But the ideology, while it regiments and orders lives, is merciless. Those who deviate from the ideology, including “backsliders” who leave these church organizations, are branded as heretics and subjected to little inquisitions, which are the natural outgrowth of messianic movements. If the Christian right seizes the legislative, executive and judicial branches of government, these little inquisitions will become big inquisitions. by Chris Hedges more on link http://www.commondreams.org/view/2010/06/07-4 added by: Stoneyroad

False claim for Nobel Peace Prize

[EDIT] What follows is a journey of verification for a claim. In the end, the lesson learned here is to ALWAYS contact the organization or person first, and when your wrong own it and make amends. At present, Waiting for final verification on Peace prize rules to ensure 100% legitimacy of claim… The rightness or wrongness of this claim really rest with the Nobel peace prize committee as this case may be more about a technicality, or wording. When the claim is fully verified I will give you either my loose verification on the authenticity of award claim… http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/1997/icbl.html in the course of 1991, several nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) and individuals began simultaneously to discuss the necessity of coordinating initiatives and calls for a ban on antipersonnel landmines. Handicap International, Human Rights Watch, Medico International, Mines Advisory Group, Physicians for Human Rights, and Vietnam Veterans of America Foundation came together in October 1992 to formalize the International Campaign to Ban Landmines. The false claim of winning the 1997 or any other year for which the Nobel prize was awarded, puts into serious jeopardy any further claims they have regarding any subject. This could show unethical or inattentive behavior that would allow their research into ethics violations by physicians look sloppy, inaccurate, or hypocritical. As the claim revolves around specific rules issues, it may be a simple case of inaccuracy in wording or the claim may be completely accurate as stated. See the Physicians for human rights claim on their website: http://physiciansforhumanrights.org/ See the entire list of Nobel Prize winners: http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/lists/all/index.html See the entire lists of organizations to win the Nobel Peace prize: http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/lists/organizations.html See the winner for the 1997 Nobel Peace prize: http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/1997/icbl.html Currently the organization “Physicians for human rights” claims CIA experimentation on prisoners under the Bush administration. If the claim is found to be true it could undermine the believability of any accusations they make. This would not only undermine this organization but, any organization that validates their present and future claims. The Study conducted by Physicians for human rights http://phrtorturepapers.org/ Notifying L.A. Times writer L.A. Times http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-torture-20100608,0,1471800…. Notifying NYT writer New York Times http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/08/opinion/08tue1.html Currently notifying NYT and LA Times… Update: June 8, 2010 2:32pm CT Contacted PHR with following message: On your home page it is mentioned that your organization is a Nobel prize winning institution. I have thus far found no verification of such a claim. If you could email me verification of this claim it would be greatly appreciated. A search of PHR's news release archive: News releases library search shows no notification for their claim of having been awarded a Nobel prize for the year of 1997, or any other year. It would seem odd for an institution to not release news of such a prestigious honor, and yet claim the award on their home page. News release library link http://physiciansforhumanrights.org/library/phr-library-search.html?document_typ… Awaiting reply and continuing investigation… Update: June 8, 2010 2:43pm CT Dear Mr. _______, please see this page on the Nobel Foundation website: http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/1997/icbl.html . PHR was a founding member of the International Campaign to Ban Landmines and shared the 1997 prize with the other members. We also are still active in this work, and currently have a petition available to join, asking President Obama to have the US finally join the ban on the use of landmines. That petition can be found here: http://actnow-phr.org/campaign/obama_landmine_action . Regards, Ms. Gurukarm Khalsa Web Editor/Producer Physicians for Human Rights 2 Arrow St., Ste. 301 Cambridge, MA 02138 617.301.4200 physiciansforhumanrights.org Advancing health, dignity and justice ONCE AGIAN, I would like to say that I STAND CORRECTED. As such I leave the post intact to illustrate humility, and to show that if you are incorrect you need to own it. UPDATE: 3:28 CT June 8, 2010 Notified everyone contacted previously, and either thanked for info or informed them of my mistake. Awaiting final confirmation from Nobel prize organization to insure that there is no technical rule violated in the usage; however at present it is best to assume that PHR's claims are indeed legitimate. UPDATE: 3:47 CT June 8, 2010 Contacted Nobel prize organization with following message: I had previously noted that PHR claims a shared 1997 Nobel prize under the organization of the International Coalition to Ban Landmines (ICBL), and would like some clarification on the rules for the Peace prize specifically. I am aware that the Peace prize can be awarded to entire organizations; however I am unsure as to whether an organization such as PHR that makes up part of another organization, in this case the ICBL, is entitled to make any claims on the award. In the case of PHR they claim a “shared 1997 Nobel Peace prize”. Regarding your rules, is this claim legitimate, accurate, or should it be worded in some other way? It is hard for me to figure out in this particular instance as I was under the impression that only the individual organization could make that claim, and not other organization or individuals belonging to the organization awarded the prize. Awaiting final confirmation from Nobel prize organization… added by: versasrev

BP Tries to Block Photos of Dead Wildlife

For animal lovers, one of the most heartbreaking aspects of the Gulf spill is the oil-drenched wildlife washing up on shore. If you're too horrified to look at any photos, you're in luck — BP doesn't want you to see them. As of Friday morning, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s tally of dead animals collected in the Gulf area was 527 birds, 235 sea turtles (six to nine times the average rate), and 30 mammals, including dolphins. Yesterday morning, the spill washed over Queen Bess Island (called “Bird Island” by locals), which is a habitat for Louisiana brown pelicans, the state bird that was once an endangered species. Forty-one of the birds were coated with oil, and that number is expected to rise. Have you seen the terrible pictures of all this carnage? Neither have I. And neither has anyone else. Wonder why? The New York Daily News reported on Wednesday that BP has ordered its contractors not to share pictures or otherwise publicize the scores of dead and injured wildlife. An unnamed BP contractor gave a reporter a very different tour from the one presented to President Obama during his recent visit. Among the “highlights,” if that's what they can be called, was a decomposing dolphin that the worker said had been found filled with oil. The shoreline grass of Queen Bess Island was covered with stricken marine life, some dead and some struggling to breathe. The normally white heads of pelicans were dark with oil. The worker said BP was insistent it didn't want any photos of the dead animals. “There is a lot of coverup for BP,” the worker told the reporter. “They know the ocean will wipe away most of the evidence.” As extra assurance that most of us will never see photographic or any other evidence of the true extent of the carnage, Louisiana residents said BP quickly whisks off dead and injured wildlife to inaccessible buildings and offshore ships. Out of sight, out of mind … but forever in locals' memories. New York Daily News reporters trying to get a closer look at the disaster were escorted from a beach by police who said they were taking orders from BP. Even Louisiana residents have been required to sign non-disclosures. Really, BP? Did you not get the memo this isn’t a police state? You may be able to control politicians by lining their pockets, but your bucks stop there. This disaster is going to affect all of us, and we have every right to see the extent of the damage. In an encouraging development, this week Charlie Riedel of the Associated Press was somehow able to bypass BP's myriad roadblocks and snap some appalling photos. They may make us want to shield our eyes, but it's important we don't bury our heads just as BP would love for us to do. added by: captainplanet71

Late Night Highlights: Stephen Colbert Takes Care of BP for Obama and Jay Leno Knocks NBC

President Obama may not be able to elicit the appropriate amount of rage towards BP, but Stephen Colbert has got a tutorial for that. Just last night, the Colbert Report host threw BP CEO Tony Hayward down a flight of stairs before unleashing an angry team of snapping turtles and sea birds at the exec. Meanwhile over at Tonight Show , Jay Leno took another swipe at NBC and flirted with his new band leader’s wife. Click through for those segments, as well as the other highlights you missed while cracking wise about Katherine Heigl .

Continued here:
Late Night Highlights: Stephen Colbert Takes Care of BP for Obama and Jay Leno Knocks NBC

President Obama Praises Kalamazoo Central Students’ ‘Sense Of Community’

‘That moment right there changed my life,’ one graduating students exclaims after shaking hands with the president. President Barack Obama surprises students at Kalamazoo Central High School Photo: MTV News President Barack Obama made some new friends on Monday, when he delivered the commencement address at Michigan’s Kalamazoo Central High School, the winning school among thousands of entrants to the White House’s “Race to the Top High School Commencement Challenge.” Before delivering his speech, the president surprised the class of 2010 with an unannounced informal meeting, where he shook hands and exchanged one-on-one words with the impending graduates. “It was the most amazing thing ever that could ever happen to anybody,” one particularly enthusiastic student gushed, while another classmate chimed in, “That moment right there changed my life, just meeting the president.” During the surprise meeting, Obama praised the high school for its strong sense of community and its promising ideals. “If you carry with you the sense of community you’ve got here in your hometown, there is nothing you can’t accomplish,” he told the students. The president’s words touched Kalamazoo’s graduates greatly. As one student put it, “Giving our school so much praise and saying how much he loved the community and everything, him talking about education [and] going further — it was just really good.” But Obama didn’t even have to open his mouth to thrill the crowd, as his mere presence earned him instant rock-star status with Kalamazoo Central’s nearly 300 graduating seniors. Several students leapt up and down screaming at the top of their lungs, others were left in awe after shaking Obama’s own hand, while some even found the time to share the good news on social networking sites. “I just updated my Facebook status: ‘Just met Barack Obama and made friends with the Secret Service,’ ” one girl happily revealed. Although the reactions to Obama’s appearance varied from student to student, the overall vibe of excitement and pride hanging in the air at Kalamazoo Central High School was palpable. “This is the biggest moment in history and we’re all a part of it,” said one overjoyed classmate. “The whole class of 2010, I’m so excited to just be here in the moment.” “The biggest moment in history” might be something of an overstatement, but Obama’s arrival at Kalamazoo certainly armed the students with an emotional touchstone to look back upon as they move forward with the next phase of their lives. As one graduate astutely observed: “It’s incredible how one man can bring everyone together like that.” Get Schooled is a national program aimed at increasing high school and college graduation rates and promoting the importance of education, developed by Viacom in partnership with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Related Videos Race To The Top: President Obama Inspires At Kalamazoo Central High School

Continued here:
President Obama Praises Kalamazoo Central Students’ ‘Sense Of Community’

‘Jersey Shore’ Season-Two Preview Teases The Gang’s Miami Road Trip

New season premieres July 29 at 10 p.m. ET/PT on MTV. By Todd Gilchrist Snooki in season two of “Jersey Shore” Photo: MTV News Can’t wait till July 29 for the “Jersey Shore” season-two premiere? Well, MTV News debuted an exclusive 13-minute clip from the new season during the MTV Movie Awards pre-show. Starting with a short recap of some of season one’s juiciest moments, fans can take a look at the setup of the new season and check in and see where the Shore-mates have been since the end of the last one. As an epic snowstorm descends on the Eastern Seaboard, the castmembers decide to head South to Miami, where they intend to bring their fist-pumping action to the topless beaches. Snooki reveals that “when she was done Snookin’ for love, she found an amazing gorilla juicehead,” with whom she’s enjoyed a two-month romance. But she says she’s open to getting in trouble, as long as the drinks are flowing down in Miami. “I feel like I’m going to be like a tornado — going from place to place destroying things.” After Snooki’s juicehead helps cover her in self-tanner — which she astutely points out that President Obama has raised taxes on — she and JWoww depart in a black SUV to make the trek down to Florida for season-two fun. Meanwhile, “brothers from another mother” Pauly D and “The Situation” hope to arrive in time to enjoy their pick of the plush Miami digs, but the duo make a detour in Myrtle Beach, where they load up on fireworks. Unfortunately, Pauly’s SUV gets stuck in the mud, and although they pass the time launching bottle rockets into the sky as an SOS for AAA, it ultimately takes two tow trucks and a new pair of Nikes to get Pauly and Sitch back on the road again. In another vehicle, Sammi “Sweetheart” announces unceremoniously that she and her season-one fella, Ronnie, have parted ways, and the two mutually agreed to be single. (We look forward to seeing how well that works out.) Ronnie in particular seems ready to be unfettered by long-term female companionship, although one of his well-wishing buddies warns him about “double-baggers,” girls whose attractiveness is so questionable that they require the guy to wear a bag over his head “in case hers falls off.” Finally, there’s Angelina, the self-professed “Kim Kardashian of Staten Island.” She announces that she’s looking forward to season two because she’s hoping it will give her a chance to “show everybody the real Angelina — not just the bitchy side.” That said, she freely admits that “the bitch of Staten Island is back and f—ing ready to party!” While Pauly and Sitch struggle to free themselves from the South Carolina mud, Snooki and JWoww arrive at a bar in Savannah, Georgia, where they try out local delicacies and turn down romantic advances. As they dine on fried pickles, a guy approaches with a pair of shot glasses and joins them for a drink. Snooki suggests that the guy “f—s his sister for a living,” but JWoww is a little kinder, saying he does not know how to hit on girls. If their opinions seem a little cruel, take comfort in the fact that the guy eventually offers his own version of iconic Jersey fist-pumping, which more or less earns all the criticisms that they volunteer about him. Check out the full clip online at midnight ET. Relive the wildest, funniest and most-jaw-dropping moments of the 2010 MTV Movie Awards, watch revealing red-carpet interviews and get exclusive movie clips after the show at MovieAwards.MTV.com . Season two of “Jersey Shore” premieres Thursday, July 29, at 10 p.m. ET/PT on MTV. Be there!

Read the original:
‘Jersey Shore’ Season-Two Preview Teases The Gang’s Miami Road Trip

New York Times Editorial Page Says Use Spill To Pass Climate Bill, Defeat Attacks On The Clean Air Act

photo via flickr The New York Times editorial page is calling on the Senate and President Obama to use the BP oil spill to pass comprehensive climate and energy reform that would reduce our dependance on dirty fuels like oil and coal. Senate Majority leader seems to have a similar idea, signaling the other day that he intends to push the Senate climate bill, championed by Sens. Kerry and Lieberman, in the beginning of July. Obama too seems ready to for… Read the full story on TreeHugger

More:
New York Times Editorial Page Says Use Spill To Pass Climate Bill, Defeat Attacks On The Clean Air Act