Tag Archives: president

Taylor Lautner Says ‘Abduction’ Has An ‘Amazing’ Story

‘I love action, but most important is the story,’ he tells MTV News of upcoming thriller. By Eric Ditzian, with reporting by Josh Horowitz Taylor Lautner Photo: MTV News Lily Collins is pretty sure Taylor Lautner, her co-star in “Abduction,” will doff his shirt at some point in the film — “which everyone would totally hate, right?” she joked recently with MTV News. When it comes to the onscreen removal of shirts and the baring of abdominal muscles, of course, Lautner is well-practiced . His “Eclipse” character seems almost allergic to covering his torso, so often does the teen werewolf appear shirtless. For other facets of “Abduction,” though, Lautner has needed some practice. That’s why he’s been hard at work for months in preparation for the summer shoot. “I’ve been training,” he told MTV News. “I did boxing training for a couple months. Now I’m into the fight training, motorcycle, I think when I get to Pittsburgh, do a little swimming training. It’s all around. It’s going to be a lot of fun.” In the Jason Bourne-style thriller, Lautner stars as a teen who stumbles upon his baby picture on a missing-persons website. As he reaches out to his birth parents, Lautner finds himself caught up in a world of underground spies and death-defying stunts. Joining him and Collins are Alfred Molina, Sigourney Weaver, Jason Isaacs and Maria Bello. “Abduction” is just one film in a growing lineup of action-centric roles for Lautner. The 18-year-old has the stunt-heavy “Eclipse” arriving in June, and he has plans for a superhero turn in “Stretch Armstrong” and a stylized thriller in “Cancun.” “I love action, but most important is the story,” Lautner said. “And the story behind this action thriller [‘Abduction’] is amazing. We got [director] John Singleton behind us. … I’m so thankful we’re getting a cast like that.” Check out everything we’ve got on “The Twilight Saga: Eclipse.” For young Hollywood news, fashion and “Twilight” updates around the clock, visit HollywoodCrush.MTV.com . Related Videos MTV Rough Cut: Taylor Lautner

Continue reading here:
Taylor Lautner Says ‘Abduction’ Has An ‘Amazing’ Story

Revolutionary Rot, But News It’s Not: AP Ignores Venezuela’s ‘Battle for Food’

Late last year, a story carried by the wire service AFP reported on an announcement by Venezuela’s Hugo Chavez that his government would launch “a new chain of government-run, cut-rate retail stores that will sell everything from food to cars to clothing.” Chavez reportedly said that these “discount socialist stores” would show people “what a real market is all about, not those speculative, money-grubbing markets, but a market for the people.” This initiative was on top of Chavez’s creation of Mercal (link is to the Venezuelan home page, complete with “The Bolivarian Government of Venezuela” logo), a state-run network of grocery stores , seven years ago. How is this great leap forward into state control working out? A June 18 Reuters dispatch carried at CNBC reports that the government can’t even keep its food fresh. But that’s okay. The wire service takes a while to get there, and even then a bit of interpretation is necessary, but eventually we learn that the Chavez “solution” to that thorny problem is to seize replacement goods from private merchants: Hugo Chavez Spearheads Raids as Food Prices Skyrocket Mountains of rotting food found at a government warehouse, soaring prices and soldiers raiding wholesalers accused of hoarding: Food supply is the latest battle in President Hugo Chavez’s socialist revolution. Venezuelan army soldiers swept through the working class, pro-Chavez neighborhood of Catia in Caracas last week, seizing 120 tons of rice along with coffee and powdered milk that officials said was to be sold above regulated prices. “The battle for food is a matter of national security,” said a red-shirted official from the Food Ministry, resting his arm on a pallet laden with bags of coffee. It is also the latest issue to divide the Latin American country where Chavez has nationalized a wide swathe of the economy, he says to reverse years of exploitation of the poor. Chavez supporters are grateful for a network of cheap state-run supermarkets and they say the raids will slow massive inflation. Critics accuse him of steering the country toward a communist dictatorship and say he is destroying the private sector. They point to 80,000 tons of rotting food found in warehouses belonging to the government as evidence the state is a poor and corrupt administrator. Jose Guzman, an assistant manager at a store raided in Catia, watched with resignation as government agents pored over the company’s accounts and computers after the food ministry official and the television cameras left. “The government is pushing this type of establishment toward bankruptcy,” said Guzman, who linked the raid to the rotten food scandal. “Somehow they have to replace all the food that was lost, and this is the most expeditious way.” Brilliant. The Reuters report goes on to inform readers that “Food prices are up 41 percent in the last 12 months during a deep recession,” that Chavez has “revived threats to take over the country’s largest private food processor, miller and brewer, Polar,” and that “government now controls between 20 percent and 30 percent of the distribution of staple foods.” A search on “Venezuela” at the Associated Press’s main site indicates that though there are several stories on developments in that country, the wire service has not reported on this latest ratchet-up of the country’s ongoing socialist horror show. It would be unfair to contend that AP is ignoring Venezuela, but its headlines and/or its dispatches have displayed an annoying tendency to downplay the significance of what should be seen as scary developments. For example, a June 14 story with a misdirecting headline (“Venezuela takes control of another private bank”) would appear to be about government seizure of a financially troubled enterprise. The real story is that the the bank’s owner/former owner “just so happens” to be “a minority shareholder of Globovision, the country’s last TV channel that takes a stridently anti-government line.” A June 8 AP report on the country’s inflation casually notes that “The government has sought to confront inflation with a range of measures including recent seizures and shutdowns of businesses that authorities accuse of driving up prices.” Pray tell, what does seizing and shutting down businesses, thereby restricting supply, have to do with fighting inflation? The wire service also gives a virtual PR voice to Chavez statements that appear at first glance to be ploys designed to position his government as the virtue police. In a deceptively titled June 11 report (“Chavez targets alcohol, smoking in Venezuela”), AP reporter Jorge Rueda uncritically relays Chavez’s assertion that “the transition (to socialism) requires a moral crusade to change Venezuelans’ values.” Readers have to get to Rueda’s final paragraphs before they understand what this appeal to virtue is really all about : Chavez has also recently used the issue in his criticisms of the country’s largest food producer, Empresas Polar, which sells the country’s leading brand of beer, Polar. Chavez has ordered the expropriation of some of Polar’s warehouses, and has warned he could decide to take over more of the company. If the government did take over the Polar brewery, it would be shut down, Chavez has warned. Addressing Polar’s president, Lorenzo Mendoza, during Thursday’s speech, Chavez said: “I don’t know what you’re going to do … with your little Polar.” He used the term “Polarcita,” which Venezuelans often use for the small beer bottles that are popular in the country. Here’s an idea: If CNN, which yesterday declared its independence and fired the Associated Press , wants to make a mark with its own wire service efforts, it might want to consider dispatching correspondents to Venezuela to catch the world up on the slow-motion horror there that the AP and broadcast TV networks have either ignored or downplayed for years. Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com .

Excerpt from:
Revolutionary Rot, But News It’s Not: AP Ignores Venezuela’s ‘Battle for Food’

MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow Dismisses ‘Fake’ ‘Platitudes’ of Conservative Mount Vernon Statement

Liberal MSNBC host Rachel Maddow on Monday mocked the Mount Vernon Statement, a conservative declaration of principles as ” a grandiose fake-parchmenty-looking thing .” The anchor first described the document as endorsing “the rule of law, and individual liberty, and opposing tyranny in the world, and the defense of family, neighborhood, community and faith.” [Audio available here .] Maddow then dismissed, “In other words, such generic ‘I love my mama’ platitudes that even a pinko-Commie-liberal-elite-infidel like me would be happy signing on to all but one paragraph of the whole Mount Vernon Statement.” (At one point, Maddow appeared to be mimicking the tone and voice of the late William F. Buckley.) The left-wing host didn’t explain which paragraph she objected to, perhaps it was the one about “limited government” or “market solutions.” However, if it has caught the ire of MSNBC, conservatives might want to learn more about it. To view the entire document, go here . To see prominent conservatives, including MRC President Brent Bozell, read the Mount Vernon Statement, see a previous NewsBusters blog. A transcript of the segment, which aired at 9:05pm EDT on June 21, follows: RACHEL MADDOW: Republicans have made a bunch of efforts in the last year to nail down exactly what it is they want to tell the American people they stand for. Remember the pizza party that Eric Cantor and Mitt Romney hosted last year? That was supposed to be the kickoff for the Republican Party`s new National Council for a New America. The plan was for Republicans to travel around the country, soliciting ideas from average Americans. Eric Cantor pulled the plug on that big idea last month after holding just one pizza event in the whole year, one little pizza party. And then there was this idea-soliciting effort from House Republicans – Americaspeakingout.com, an online forum for Americans to provide new ideas for the Republican Party platform. As the Associated Press noted this weekend, that effort is also not bearing much fruit for Republicans. If you go to the “Liberty and Freedom” page, for example, right now, you can see that the top suggested ideas are “Please protect my right to play poker,” and “Eliminate `don`t ask, don`t tell.`” Also, “Keep the Republicans out of our bedrooms” and “Ban handguns” and “Drop the idea that we`re a Christian country.” You think the Republican Party is ready to run with those ideas? From Americaspeakingout.com, their big ideas generator? Then there was You Cut, the House Republican project to let the American people literally set the legislative agenda for Republicans. People would vote online on what federal spending programs should be cut, and then House Republicans would propose those cuts, thereby slashing federal spending by 0.017 percent. The anti-spending Cato Institute here ridiculing House Republican for their effort to exchange their own initiative, their own leadership, for a meaningless social media gimmick. Then there was the Mount Vernon Statement, a grandiose fake-parchmenty-looking thing that conservatives signed on to as their statement of Constitutional conservatism for the 21st century, endorsing things like the rule of law, and individual liberty, and opposing tyranny in the world, and the defense of family, neighborhood, community and faith. In other words, such generic “I love my mama” platitudes that even a pinko-Commie-liberal-elite-infidel like me would be happy signing on to all but one paragraph of the whole Mount Vernon Statement. And if I fit into your definition of conservative, your definition of conservative is probably broken. It`s one thing to have the luxury to work out your principles in the abstract, to have your pizza parties and your parchmenty statements that talk about loving America and hating foreign aid or whatever. It`s all well and good until what you want government to do actually gets put to the test, like say when a giant, totally unforeseen catastrophe happens, like what is happening right now in the Gulf — the biggest environmental disaster ever in our country, plainly and inarguably caused by an oil company screwing up. It`s exposed deep rifts and deep disagreements among conservatives, among Republicans, about what to do and why.

Read more here:
MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow Dismisses ‘Fake’ ‘Platitudes’ of Conservative Mount Vernon Statement

After Only Six Days, Olbermann Kisses and Makes Up with Daily Kos Blog

Keith Olbermann just couldn’t stay mad at the radical leftists at the Daily Kos. Six days after walking away in a huff, the MSNBC host returned to his spot on the blog on Tuesday morning, with the headline “So, uh, this looks like a nice site.” He began: “OK, I’m back.” I’ve always liked to invent backstories behind cliches and one of my oldest ones is the idea that the first guy who said “You can’t see the forest for the trees” was actually running through a forest when he ran head first into a tree and didn’t enjoy the experience. You do tend to swear at the trees, and, if you hit your head hard enough, you might even swear off that particular forest for awhile. Olbermann claimed to be delighted that responses to his “I’m out of here” blog entry brought a wide spectrum of opinion, and that perhaps he had a new thought buried beneath his self-admitted daily pomposity:  It occurs to me, in the full flower of the pomposity that always strikes me at midday, that this might be somewhat metaphorical for progressives and other centrists, particularly relative to criticism of the Administration. I was reminded of this last night when somebody asked me why I wasn’t pounding the President more on Afghanistan, and I linked him the Comment I did last year saying Obama should declare victory and go home. “Sure,” the guy replied, “you’ve been critical of that, once, but you seem to go lightly on them.” And I said, you’re right…other than this stuff about the BP disaster, and the Public Option, and the political strategy on Health Care Reform, and Afghanistan, and not prosecuting torture, and the Kagan nomination, and maybe six dozen complaints about process or tone. I mention this because the last diary was misinterpreted by 99% of the old media and 99.5% of the new media. I didn’t ‘quit Daily Kos because I got criticized for criticizing POTUS.’ I wrote what I wrote because there was a body of us here which assumed any criticism of this administration had to originate in a nefarious and wholly nugatory plan to destroy it. There certainly are such nefarious and wholly nugatory plans, active, this very minute: The most prominent is called the Republican Party (GOBP). Meanwhile, one group of progressives/liberals/Democrats has assumed no such conspiracy theory, demanded no purity test, and taken no instant and farfetched umbrage. These are the individuals known as the Obama Administration. I haven’t been in contact with anybody there since my comments on the President’s speech, but I sure as hell was in contact with them after every single one of the criticisms I mentioned above. Nobody ever called me up to complain. Nobody ever called me up to dissuade. Nobody schmoozed me, and nobody threatened me. They seem to assume it comes with the job. And they correctly assume that if I’m critical of them, they’re entitled to be critical of my criticism. This differs from the previous occupants of the White House in more ways than this site has members and lurkers and trolls combined. You will recall that every criticism of Bush was a plot to destroy America. Criticism of Obama is…democracy. That’s funny. Keith usually suggests criticism of Obama is….racist. Olbermann apologized for his wounded ago, even as he’s accustomed to dishing it out at least as viciously as he takes it:  The show I do and the positions I take are under assault, every day, from every possible direction, and I’m not complaining about it: I can afford the suit of armor. I just get pissed off now and again when I’m busy dodging bazookas and somebody bounces a nine-volt battery off my shiny metal ass claiming I’m actually an agent trying to make dough the easy way. I should have laughed at the ludicrousness of the idea. I didn’t. Sometimes it gets sweaty inside the armor. I’m not given to rash decisions (and when I say “I’m not,” of course I mean, “I am.”)

Go here to read the rest:
After Only Six Days, Olbermann Kisses and Makes Up with Daily Kos Blog

Sally Quinn: Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden Should Switch Jobs

Sally Quinn really wants to be helpful to both President Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. However, the result of her laughable suggestion that Hillary and Vice-President Biden switch jobs is that it would only highlight the desperate political situation that the current administration has gotten itself into. Here is Sally trying to be helpful with her bizarre recommendation : Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden should switch jobs. Really. Really? Of course this job switch, a first in history for a vice president to switch places with a cabinet member, would be one more indication of Obama trying to pull himself out of the political abyss he finds himself in. That thought seems not to have entered Sally’s mind as she happily chirps on about this scenario which includes a big plug for Hillary: It makes sense for the Democrats, actually. Clinton has done an incredible job as secretary of state. First of all, she has worked harder than anyone should ever be expected to. She has managed to do the impossible: She is the ambassador of the United States to the world, maintaining her credibility while playing the bad guy to President Obama’s good guy, such as with North Korea, Iran and Israel, and still looking good. She has been a true team player. If Clinton is dissatisfied with her role, you would never know it. She has been loyal and supportive to the president and has maintained a good relationship with him and with others in the White House. If she is being left out of the policymaking, or being sent on trips to keep her out of town, she has not shown it. She is cheerful, thoughtful, serious and diligent. There are no horror stories about her coming out of the State Department. Most notable, though, is that Bill Clinton has not been the problem that so many anticipated. He has been supportive of her and of Obama, and he has stayed out of the limelight and been discreet about his own life.  Sally sounds more like she is promoting Hillary for sainthood than for the vice-presidency. In fact, Sally believes that the Hillary “magic” would be enough to ward off the “evil” Sarah Palin spell: She is tireless and relentless. Given the combination of votes that she and Obama got in the 2008 primary campaign, they would be a near-unbeatable team. Clinton also appeals to independents, but importantly, she would neutralize the effect of Sarah Palin. Whatever Palin came up with, Hillary could best her — and the Tea Party crowd as well. The Republicans would lose their “year of the woman” argument. And based on experience alone, Hillary is far more qualified to be president than any of the Republicans being considered today, including Mitt Romney, Bobby Jindal, Tim Pawlenty and Palin.  And what of Joe Biden? How would he handle what is essentially a demotion? According to Sally, he would happily swallow his pride because he secretly wants to become Secretary of State: True, Joe Biden has been rehabilitated. A recent profile in The Post portrayed him as a successful and intelligent man whose foreign policy advice is valued by the president. The gaffe-prone former chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee seems to have worked out the kinks. Clearly, he is aware that he is no longer an independent voice but, rather, a representative of the president. But Biden has no intention of running for president in six years. His passion is foreign policy. He would have been an ideal choice for secretary of state had he not been Obama’s running mate. And those who know him have said that secretary of state is his dream job.  So welcome to Sally’s World in which a simple job switch would cause the “evil” Republicans to melt away make everything right again for the liberal agenda. Sally saved her best laugh line about this job switch suggestion for the final sentence: Take it seriously.  Oh yes, Sally, we  certainly will… BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

Read more:
Sally Quinn: Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden Should Switch Jobs

Newsweek’s Reed: Obama "out of his cotton-picking mind"

The left’s strategy is clear: any opposition to President Obama is not driven by ideological and/or political disagreement. No, it’s driven by racism and whole groups of people have been strategically tarnished. You would think these people would be even more careful, then again the majority of people making racist statements against the president these days seems to be coming from the left…. He said I know this is going to be — lead to some, quote, difficulty for the guys who work on those rigs. Well, if he thinks that some guys on the rigs are the only people that are going to be affected by a six-month oil moratorium, he’s out of his cotton-picking mind. — Julia Reed, Newsweek senior editor on CNN on Anderson Cooper 360 Whoops. While we all know what Obama supporters would be shreiking had this been said by a Republican, watch how quickly this dies down when coming from one of their own.

Read the original:
Newsweek’s Reed: Obama "out of his cotton-picking mind"

Beck Highlights the Sharp Contrast of Two NBC Universal Products – CNBC and MSNBC Reactions over BP Oil Spill

The media reaction to the Obama administration’s handling of the BP Gulf oil spill crisis has been a mixed bag. But it hasn’t been good. Some are arguing President Barack Obama has gone too far and overstepped his legal authority and some are arguing he hasn’t gone far enough with the “boot on the throat” mentality. And on his June 17 Fox News Channel program, Glenn Beck played three separate examples of these differences you normally wouldn’t associate with one another – CNBC’s Matt Nesto, liberal flame-thrower and comedian Rosie O’Donnell and MSNBC’s Ed Schultz. “Even the people at NBC are noticing maybe something is not right,” Beck said. Beck was referring to comments made by Nesto on CNBC’s June 16 “Closing Bell,” which Nesto emphasized his concerned over the President’s action. “I’m very troubled by the fact that the President has again created his own sense of a legal system,” Nesto said. “It’s not his job to create laws. It’s his job to enforce laws.” And Beck noted that Nesto had an understanding of constitutional authority in that regard. “OK, it’s not his job to create laws but to enforce them,” Beck said. “Yes, that’s if you understand the Constitution. CNBC is noticing something is wrong.” Beck’s next example clearly doesn’t. O’Donnell, who has a radio show now, had a different take on how the office of the presidency should exercise its authority as it pertains to BP. “But the President couldn’t get these things to happen unless those who want fundamental transformation are starting to create those conditions where the President can do what he knows is right,” he continued. “We’ve already seen it. Rosie O’Donnell is calling for the government just to seize BP.” He played comments from O’Donnell’s radio show earlier this month . “Seize their assets today,” O’Donnell said. “Take over the country, I don’t care. Issue an executive order. Say, BP, guess what? Call it socialism, call it communism, call it anything you want. Let’s watch Rush Limbaugh explode on TV when he talks. Seize the assets, take over…” And along that same line, Beck pointed out how a particular MSNBC host wanted Obama to go dictatorial on the embattled oil giant. “MSNBC is the same network who said that I was crazy for saying that we are heading down a road that the world has been down before: a big government road that could eventually lead to a dictator — maybe this president, maybe not, maybe the next one or the one after that,” Beck said. “It doesn’t matter. Progressivism will always end in complete control. But listen now to MSNBC and one of their hosts.” Beck played two clips from MSNBC’s June 15 “The Ed Show,” which host Ed Schultz on two separate occasions called for the President to come down harsh on BP. “Mr. President, I want to see the boot on the neck of BP tonight. I want to see some finger-pointing, whether it’s in your personality or not,” Schultz said. “And it’s OK tonight to act kind of like a dictator and call the shots, say, and this is the way it’s going to be.” In the second clip, Schultz had made the suggestion to far-left Ohio Democratic Congressman Dennis Kucinich. “Don’t you think this is a moment where President Obama has to make sure that he lets everybody know that he’s calling the shots?” Schultz said. “In almost in words of maybe a dictator that this is the way we’re going to do it.” And to this, Beck noted the double standard – how MSNBC will criticize him for accusing Obama of acting like a dictator versus MSNBC actually calling on him to act like a dictator. “They’re calling — he went more — they’re calling for him to actually be a dictator or acts like a dictator. No thank you. No thank you,” Beck said. “I get in hot water for showing how we are expanding government so much that if a wrong guy gets in, we will have a dictator. But MSNBC can literally demand that the president start being a dictator and there’s nothing.” The Fox News host accused of MSNBC of trying to create an environment which the White House could exercise more control. “And everyone is saying that the president is in trouble because he’s lost MSNBC, the ‘thrill up the leg’ network – yes, yes, yes,” Beck said. “It’s almost like they are creating the condition to force him to do the things that he knows are right.”

Excerpt from:
Beck Highlights the Sharp Contrast of Two NBC Universal Products – CNBC and MSNBC Reactions over BP Oil Spill

ABC Focuses Oil Spill Blame on BP and Coast Guard, Not Obama; CBS Gives President ‘C’ for Response

On Thursday’s Good Morning America on ABC, co-host George Stephanopoulos laid blame on BP and Coast Guard Admiral Thad Allen for mishandling the Gulf oil spill response but depicted the Obama administration as having done everything it could. In contrast, on the CBS Early Show, guests from both sides of the aisle gave the President a ‘C’ grade for his response.   At the top of Good Morning America, Stephanopoulos described how BP CEO Tony Hayward would be facing a “public execution” in Thursday’s congressional hearings and how Michigan Democratic Congressman Bart Stupak promised to “slice and dice” Hayward. In a report that followed, correspondent Jonathan Karl furthered the theme of courageous Democrats standing up to the big oil villain: “Tony Hayward may be the most hated man in America. And he’s heading right into a buzz saw of congressional outrage. In his prepared testimony, Hayward declares, ‘I am deeply sorry.’ But the chairman of the committee says that’s not enough.” A clip of Democratic committee chairman Henry Waxman was played. Minutes later, Stephanopoulos interviewed Louisiana Plaquemines Parish President Billy Nungesser and wondered: “…with everything the President and BP announced this week, do you think this is on the right track now?” After Nungesser expressed doubt about local fisherman being reimbursed for financial losses and a lack of organization in the response, Stephanopoulos deflected any criticism away from President Obama and suggested another target: “The White House has approved the building of berms, they’ve sent the boom down there, Admiral Allen is on the scene every day. Are you saying he is not giving you the help you need? And do you think he should keep his job?” Nungesser replied: “I don’t know if it’s Admiral Allen. I don’t know if the chain of command. Something’s not working.” Stephanopoulos pressed further: “So how does it get done? Is Admiral Allen the right man for the job right now?” The headline on-screen during the segment read: “Desperation On the Gulf; Residents Want More Action.” Meanwhile, on the Early Show, co-host Harry Smith invited Republican strategist Dan Bartlett and Democratic strategist Rob Zimmerman to grade President Obama’s handling of the disaster. Bartlett replied: “Well I think, Harry, anything above maybe a C-minus would be difficult to score.” Smith joked: ” ‘Gentleman’s C,’ we’ve heard that before.” Zimmerman actually graded on the same curve: “Harry, I’d have to agree with Dan. I’d give him a C on this, a C at this point.” Unlike the more generic ABC headline, the on-screen headline on CBS read: “Disaster in the Gulf: Day 59; What’s Next Step for Obama Administration?” Barlett later questioned the wisdom of the White House using the crisis to push controversial cap-and-trade energy legislation. Smith agreed with that concern, asking Zimmerman: “…you have to confess….At the end of the speech he says, ‘Well now it’s time for us to think about energy policy and this is a perfect, perfect jumping-off point,’ was that, as you watched, were you thinking, ‘Boy that’s a good idea,’ or were you thinking, ‘Not now, not now!'”   Zimmerman argued: “But unless we, in fact, put in place an aggressive energy policy, we run the risk of this tragedy happening all over again.” Smith agreed: “That goes without saying.” However, he reiterated: “But from a political standpoint, it’s not as if he’s saying, ‘Okay, I’ve solved all the problems, I have got the bully pulpit, I’ve got the momentum. Now’s the time to jump on this.'” On Tuesday, while the Early Show and NBC’s Today challenged White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs on the administration’s response, former Democratic strategist Stephanopoulos lobbed softballs to the Obama staff member. 

Read the rest here:
ABC Focuses Oil Spill Blame on BP and Coast Guard, Not Obama; CBS Gives President ‘C’ for Response

Rep. Joe Barton Apologizes to BP’s Tony Hayward for White House "Shakedown"

BP CEO Tony Hayward is in the midst of a harsh grilling today on Capitol Hill, where he is testifying House Committee on Energy and Commerce hearing on “The Role of BP in the Deepwater Horizon Explosion and Oil Spill.” But not long after the hearing began, Hayward got something not many expected from lawmakers: An apology. Rep. Joe Barton, a Texas Republican, apologized to Hayward for what he described as a “shakedown” at the White House yesterday. He was referring to the deal worked out between the Obama administration and BP to set up a $20 billion fund administered by a third party to pay for damages from the catastrophic oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. “I'm ashamed of what happened in the White House yesterday,” Barton said. “I think it is a tragedy of the first proportion that a private corporation can be subjected to what I would characterize as a shakedown, in this case, a $20 billion shakedown.” He complained that “the attorney general of the United States, who is legitimately conducting a criminal investigation and has every right to do so to protect the interests of the American people, [is] participating in what amounts to a $20 billion slush fund that's unprecedented in our nation's history, that's got no legal standing, and which sets, I think, a terrible precedent for the future.” “I apologize,” Barton added. “I do not want to live in a country where any time a citizen or a corporation does something that is legitimately wrong is subject to some sort of political pressure that is — again, in my words, amounts to a shakedown. So I apologize.” “I'm speaking now totally for myself,” he noted. “I'm not speaking for the Republican Party.” Not long after Barton spoke, the White House released a statement calling his comments “shameful.” “What is shameful is that Joe Barton seems to have more concern for big corporations that caused this disaster than the fishermen, small business owners and communities whose lives have been devastated by the destruction,” said Press Secretary Robert Gibbs. “Congressman Barton may think that a fund to compensate these Americans is a 'tragedy', but most Americans know that the real tragedy is what the men and women of the Gulf Coast are going through right now. Members from both parties should repudiate his comments.” According to the Associated Press, Barton has taken more than $100,000 in political contributions from oil and gas interests since the beginning of 2009, more than all but one other member of the House Energy and Commerce Committee. At the hearing, Rep. Ed Markey (D – MA) said he “could not disagree more strongly” with Barton's comments. “Not only is the compensation fund that was created yesterday at the White House in an agreement reached between BP and President Obama not a slush fund and not a shakedown, rather it was the government of the United States worked to protect the most vulnerable citizens that we have in this country right now – the residents of the Gulf,” he said. “American citizens are being harmed,” Markey added. “We cannot wait, as unfortunately so many victims of the Exxon Valdez had to wait years to see those families compensated. We can't lose sight of fact that the 1984 Bhophal disaster and lawsuits related to it, were only settled last week. We have to make sure American citizens are protected.” “The families of the Gulf will be crushed financially unless this compensation fund is put in place,” said Markey, arguing that the history of Gulf families will be “permanently altered” without action. Markey added that the creation of the slush fund reflected “American government working at its best” to ensure that families do not become “roadkill” as a result of corporate practices. As Markey spoke, Barton leaned back in his chair reading what appeared to be the newspaper Investor's Business Daily. added by: TimALoftis

See the original post:
Rep. Joe Barton Apologizes to BP’s Tony Hayward for White House "Shakedown"

Warriors Go “Back To The Future” With New Logo And Colors

The Golden State Warriors will be going with a somewhat retro look next season as the team revealed its new colors and logo on “ Warriors.com ” Thursday. The logo is a tribute to the insignia “ The City ” which was one of the most popular uniforms in the history of the NBA. The new colors are being described as “ Warriors Royal Blue ” and “ California Golden Yellow .” Golden State President Robert Rowell seems quite excited with the team’s new look. Rowell said “This new logo pays homage to our organization’s rich history and unique standing in the Bay Area sports community. The throwback uniforms we’ve worn as part of the NBA’s Hardwood Classics initiative in recent years have been extremely popular with our fans, and we set out to design a new look that was clean and traditional in that same spirit. We are grateful to the NBA and adidas for providing us with a magnitude of creative freedom, along with invaluable expertise, during this process.” Whether the team will make the NBA Playoffs next season remains to be seen. But even if they play lousy on the hardwood at least they will look sharper while they do.

Go here to read the rest:
Warriors Go “Back To The Future” With New Logo And Colors