Tag Archives: psych

‘Scott Pilgrim Vs. The World’: Big Fun, By Kurt Loder

Michael Cera crushes the competition in Edgar Wright’s fantasy epic. Michael Cera in “Scott Pilgrim vs. the World” Photo: Universal Pictures “Scott Pilgrim vs. the World” is the first movie to bring us, among many other things, on-screen battle-scoring, a visit from the Vegetarian Police, and a really cute kickass girl named Knives. For most of its modest run-time (112 minutes), Edgar Wright’s new comedy lays persuasive claim to being the year’s most blazingly imaginative film. Well, okay, along with “Inception.” But Wright’s movie is also blazingly funny, something no one has yet attempted to assert about the Christopher Nolan blockbuster. The picture is a dizzying creative leap for Wright, the giddy parodist behind “Shaun of the Dead” and “Hot Fuzz.” Bryan Lee O’Malley’s Scott Pilgrim comics began appearing in 2004, and the director latched onto them almost immediately. One understands why it has taken him so long to bring O’Malley’s fantastical stories to the screen — the cast, which is deep in talented young actors, must have been difficult to align. Michael Cera plays Scott Pilgrim, mild-mannered bass player in a Toronto punk band called the Sex Bob-Omb. Ellen Wong is Knives Chau, his underage girlfriend, and Mary Elizabeth Winstead is Ramona, the mysterious Amazon delivery girl for whom he truly yearns. Then there’s Anna Kendrick as Scott’s sister, Stacey, who can’t believe her 22-year-old brother is dating a high-school girl (“Scandal!”); and Kieran Culkin as Scott’s gay roommate, Wallace, whose specialty is stealing Stacey’s boyfriends; and Alison Pill as Kim, the monumentally hostile drummer in Scott’s band. The plot, unlike the movie itself, is simple: In order to win the elusive Ramona, Scott must first do battle with her seven former lovers — the Evil Exes. The picture is constructed like a vintage video-arcade game, and these contests have a wild, psychedelic propulsion. One of the Exes, Lucas Lee (Chris Evans in a winningly self-deprecating performance), is a movie star of explosive non-cinematic skills (he flings Scott through the air with such force that the skinny suitor lands on a faraway tower). Another, Todd Ingram (Brandon Routh in a blindingly blond wig), is the vegan bass player in a rival band, the Clash at Demonhead, and he engages Scott in a withering battle-of-the-basses. The bisexual Roxy Richter (Mae Whitman) is a kickboxing tornado; the Katanayagi twins (Keita Saitou and Shota Saito) are star DJs armed with wall-shaking amplification; and Matthew Patel (Satya Bhabha) is a heavily-mascara’d fop who comes flying into a concert to perform a quick dance number with a crew of demon backup chicks and then give Scott a very hard martial-artsy time. Scott dispatches these characters with some ace moves of his own (“I kicked him so hard that he saw the curvature of the Earth!”). But waiting at the end of this line of antagonists is snaky club-owner Gideon Gordon Graves (a preening Jason Schwartzman), the most formidable Ex of all. Much of the movie’s whacked-out humor is the work of the director. Wright’s facility with eccentric ornamentation — bursts of canned laugh-track laughter, proudly cartoonish graphics, dreamscape enchantments and sudden split-screenery — is irresistibly endearing; and his whiz-bang editing is a marvel throughout. (He’s always one step ahead of the viewer, suddenly taking us places we didn’t realize we were ready to go to yet.) And the script, which he co-wrote, is a feast of deadpan throwaways. (“I’ve dabbled with being a bitch,” says Ramona. “My brother is permanently enfeebled,” notes Stacey.) It’s a bit of a letdown, then, that the movie loses its witty focus toward the end and descends into familiar CGI uproar (the concluding faceoff with Gideon goes on much too long). But any movie that can sell us Michael Cera as a hard-hitting hero has already accomplished something remarkable (as has Cera himself, of course). And the entrancingly bizarre world into which Scott’s adventures have been set summons that rarest of responses: It feels like something new. Check out everything we’ve got on “Scott Pilgrim vs. the World.” For breaking news and previews of the latest comic book movies — updated around the clock — visit SplashPage.MTV.com . Related Videos MTV Rough Cut: ‘Scott Pilgrim Vs. The World’

Read more here:
‘Scott Pilgrim Vs. The World’: Big Fun, By Kurt Loder

Lauren Froderman Wins So You Think You Can Dance

So You Think You Can Dance ended its season finale last night with two broken hearts, one dancer $250,000 richer and everyone in need of a crash cart. The three finalists – Kent Boyd, Lauren Froderman and Robert Roldan – danced eight routines between them, and the All-Stars got quite the workout, too. When the votes came in, Lauren was the winner. The 18-year-old cheerleader from Phoenix, Ariz., pulled a modest upset over Kent, the judges’ and fans’ golden boy from the first audition of the season. “There’s a ton of things I’d like to say,” said Lauren, battling shock, laughter and tears as her name was announced over Kent’s (Robert was ousted first). “But I can’t!” AMERICA’S FAVORITE DANCER : Lauren Froderman deserved the honor! Despite being the only female dancer in the show’s top six this year, Lauren proved week after week that she was a force to be reckoned with, even against Kent. She couldn’t be confined to one particular genre and managed to be sexy, feminine and technically proficient in ways most dancers, even elite ones, struggle to. One awesome, random surprise of the So You Think You Can Dance finale ? Ellen DeGeneres filling in for the injured Alex Wong to get down with some hip-hop. The woman loves to dance. Wonder if there’s something to the fact that producer Nigel Lythgoe is returning to American Idol , which Ellen just left the panel of. In any case, congratulations again to Lauren (and Kent and Robert)!

More:
Lauren Froderman Wins So You Think You Can Dance

Lindsay Lohan to Leave Rehab Early Too?

She already got special treatment in jail . Now Lindsay Lohan could get an early release from UCLA Medical Center as well, if the new judge in her case grants it. Judge Marsha Revel, who recused herself from the case this week, ordered Lindsay to spend 90 days in lockdown at UCLA for psychiatric and drug treatment. However, the inpatient program she’s in typically lasts 45 days. When the program ends, new judge Elden Fox could release Lindsay from UCLA and place her in outpatient care. The question is whether that’s likely to happen. It’s “not uncommon” for a patient to repeat a program , according to TMZ, meaning that after 45 days, Lindsay could be given the same treatment another time. Lindsay could be back doing weird fashion shoots before you know it. The treatment is not necessarily redundant because patients often absorb a lot more the second time, having already been through the more difficult first 45. It’s also possible, if not likely that UCLA would customize Lohan’s treatment for the second 45-day stretch based on her unresolved drug and mental issues . Doctors have not decided how long this phase of Lindsay’s treatment should last, and Judge Fox would almost certainly follow doctors’ recommendations. Lindsay has been at UCLA for 11 days after getting sprung from jail after less than two weeks. That was supposed to be a 90-day stint as well, if you recall. Celebrities …

Continued here:
Lindsay Lohan to Leave Rehab Early Too?

The Hidden Tragedy of the CIA’s Experiments on Children | t r u t h o u t

Bobby is seven years old, but this is not the first time he has been subjected to electroshock. It's his third time. In all, over the next year, Bobby will experience eight electroshock sessions. Placed on the examining table, he is held down by two male attendants while the physician places a solution on his temples. Bobby struggles with the two men holding him down, but his efforts are useless. He cries out and tries to pull away. One of the attendants tries to force a thick wedge of rubber into his mouth. He turns his head sharply away and cries out, “Let me go, please. I don't want to be here. Please, let me go.” Bobby's physician looks irritated and she tells him, “Come on now, Bobby, try to act like a big boy and be still and relax.” Bobby turns his head away from the woman and opens his mouth for the wedge that will prevent him from biting through his tongue. He begins to cry silently, his small shoulders shaking and he stiffens his body against what he knows is coming. Mary is only five years old. She sits on a small, straight-backed chair, moving her legs back and forth, humming the same four notes over and over and over. Her head, framed in a tangled mass of golden curls, moves up and down with each note. For the first three years of her life, Mary was thought to be a mostly normal child. Then, after she began behaving oddly, she had been handed off to a foster family. Her father and About the same time Dr. Bender was conducting her electroshock experiments, she was also widely experimenting on autistic and schizophrenic children with what she termed other “treatment endeavors.” These included use of a wide array of psycho-pharmaceutical agents, several provided to her by the Sandoz Chemical Co. in Basel, Switzerland, as well as Metrazol, sub-shock insulin therapy, amphetamines and anticonvulsants. Metrazol was a trade name for pentylenetetrazol, a drug used as a circulatory and respiratory stimulant. High doses cause convulsions, as discovered in 1934 by the Hungarian-American neurologist and psychiatrist Ladislas J. Meduna. Metrazol had been used in convulsive therapy, but was never considered to be effective, and side effects such as seizures were difficult to avoid. The medical records of several patients who were confined at Vermont State Hospital, a public mental facility, reveal that Metrazol was administered to them by CIA contractor Dr. Robert Hyde on numerous occasions in order “to address overly aggressive behavior.” One of these patients, Karen Wetmore, received the drug on a number of occasions for no discernible medical reason. During the same ten-year period in which Metrazol was used by the Vermont State Hospital, patient deaths skyrocketed. In 1982, the FDA revoked its approval of Metrazol. Here it should be noted that, during the cold war years, CIA and Army Counter-Intelligence Corps (CIC) interrogators, working as part of projects Bluebird and Artichoke, sometimes injected large amounts of Metrazol into selected enemy or Communist agents for the purposes of severely frightening other suspected agents, by forcing them to observe the procedure. The almost immediate effects of Metrazol are shocking for many to witness: subjects will shake violently, twisting and turning. They typically arch, jerk and contort their bodies and grimace in pain. With Metrazol, as with electroshock, bone fractures – including broken necks and backs – and joint dislocations are not uncommon, unless strong sedatives are administered beforehand. A November 1936 Time mag. article seriously questioned the benefits of Metrazol, citing “irreversible shock” as a “great danger.” The article described a typical Metrazol injection as such: “A patient receives no food for four or five hours. Then about five cubic centimeters of the drug [Metrazol] are injected into his veins. In about half-a-minute he coughs, casts terrified glances around the room, twitches violently, utters a horse wail, freezes into rigidity with his mouth wide open, arms and legs stiff as boards. Then he goes into convulsions. In one or two minutes the convulsions are over and he gradually passes into a coma, which lasts about an hour. After a series of shocks, his mind may be swept clean of delusions…. A patient is seldom given more than 20 injections and if no improvement is noted after ten treatments, he is usually given up as hopeless.” The Army, the CIA and Metrazol | This is just important sections go read whole thing! Army CIC interrogators working with the CIA at prisoner of war camps and safe house locations in post-war Germany on occasion used Metrazol, morphine, heroin and LSD on incarcerated subjects. According to former CIC officer Miles Hunt, several “safe houses and holding areas outside of Frankfurt near Oberursel” – a former Nazi interrogation center taken over by the US – were operated by a “special unit run by Capt. Malcolm S. Hilty, Maj. Mose Hart and Capt. Herbert Sensenig. Eventually, CIC interrogators working in Germany would be assisted in their use of interrogation drugs by several “former” Nazi scientists recruited by the CIA and US State Department as part of Project Paperclip. By early 1952, the CIC's Rough Boys would routinely use Metrazol during interrogations, as well as LSD, mescaline and conventional electroshock units. Metrazol-like drugs are still used in interrogations today. According to reports from several former noncommissioned Army officers, who served on rendition-related security details in Turkey, Pakistan and Romania, drugs that produce effects quite similar to Metrazol are still used in 2010 by the Pentagon and CIA on enemy combatants and rendered subjects held at the many “black sites” maintained across the globe. Observed one former officer recently, “They would twist up like a pretzel, in unbelievable shapes and jerk and shake like crazy, their eyes nearly popping out of their heads.” In 2008, at the behest of US Sens. Carl Levin, Joe Biden and Chuck Hagel and in reaction to a March 2008 article in The Washington Post, the Pentagon initiated an Inspector General Report on the use of “mind-altering substances by DoD [Department of Defense] Personnel during Interrogations of Detainees and/or Prisoners Captured during the War on Terror.” It is not known if the investigation has been completed. Among the more famous recent cases of the use of drugs upon prisoners concerns one-time alleged “enemy combatant” Jose Padilla, who had originally been accused of wanting to set off a “dirty bomb.” The government has gone to great efforts to keep the public uninformed as regards use of drugs on prisoners. In an article by Carol Rosenberg for McClatchy News in July 2010, Rosenberg reported that, when covering the Guantanamo military commissions trials, when the question of “what psychotropic drugs were given another accused 9/11 conspirator, Ramzi bin al Shibh, the courtroom censor hits a white noise button so reporters viewing from a glass booth can't hear the names of the drugs. Under current Navy instructions for the use of human subjects in research, the undersecretary of the Navy is described as the authority in charge of research concerning “consciousness-altering drugs or mind-control techniques,” while at the same time is also responsible for “inherently controversial topics” that might attract media interest or “challenge by interest groups.” added by: toyotabedzrock

Watch Psych Season 5 Episode 5 – Shawn and Gus in Drag (Racing)

Watch Psych S5E5: Shawn and Gus in Drag (Racing) The latest installment of Psych which is entitled “Shawn and Gus in Drag (Racing)” is the comedy TV series’ 5th episode of the 5th season that aired last 08/11/2010 Wednesday at 10:00 PM on USA.

Fantasia Released From Hospital

Singer is discharged two days after apparent suicide attempt. By Mawuse Ziegbe Fantasia Photo: Bennett Raglin/WireImage Fantasia Barrino was released from the hospital on Wednesday (August 11) after apparently trying to commit suicide by overdosing on medication . The “American Idol” season-three victor was rushed to the hospital Monday after she was found in a North Carolina home. Barrino’s manager, Brian Dickens, confirmed to MTV News that she was released from Carolinas Medical Center-Mercy in North Carolina after being admitted to the hospital under an alias. “She has been lifted up by the outpouring of love and support from her fans,” Dickens said in a statement to MTV News. “She is more committed than ever to her daughter and her work because they are her heart, her soul and inspiration.” The “Idol” champ shocked fans when she reportedly attempted to take her own life by ingesting a combination of aspirin and a sleep aid . Many Barrino fans have expressed their support during the past few days; however, some have blasted the singer for her alleged relationship with a married man and for almost leaving her young daughter without a mother. Although Barrino has been the subject of public criticism and is obviously experiencing setbacks in her personal life, public-relations expert Howard Bragman believes the Free Yourself singer will be able to bounce back. “I think the number-one thing Fantasia has to do is heal. I think she has to get some psychological help, find out what brought her to this moment, and make sure it doesn’t happen again … that is number one,” Bragman told MTV News. “And once that’s under control, then you start to look at your projects on the horizon. You don’t give yourself this timetable. But assuming she’s well enough in a matter of weeks or months to promote her album or her projects, well, the reality is, we live in a very forgiving society.” Share your well-wishes with Fantasia and her family in the comments. Related Artists Fantasia

Read the rest here:
Fantasia Released From Hospital

Mythbusters Gagged: Credit Card Companies Kill Episode Exposing RFID Security Flaws

Well, since I can't post this on my other news story website, I'll do so here. the Mythbusters totally rock and it is sad the episode wasn't aired on television added by: Peacey

First Images of Kelly Brook’s Playboy Photoshoot Released

A closer glimpse to Kelly Brook’s Playboy photo shoot has been released. Brook, who will have her sultry images fronting the September issue of the men’s magazine, graces the cover with an umbrella, a bowler hat, a bow-tie, black lacy underwear and has her hands covering her boobs. In addition to the cover image, which is entitled “The U.K’s hottest export”, another revealed-picture shows Brook posing seductively and baring lots of her skin. Brook, however, admitted that she felt nervous about the photo shoot, telling the magazine: “I’m not 20 any more. My boobs are real, and they even hang a little.” Brook was said pocketing a half-a-million dollar to pose naked for the adult magazine. A source also revealed to The Sun, “It’s a real honor to be asked to do Playboy as obviously they are very picky about who they want. And by the same token it’s a real coup for Playboy as there probably isn’t a red-blooded male who won’t be looking forward to the pictures.” http://www.theblogismine.com/2010/08/09/first-images-of-kelly-brooks-playboy-pho… added by: theblogismine

Unselfishly Unpopular- Unselfish and Exceptional Individuals are often Disliked

If you want to listen to public radio, you have to donate to public radio…or you can of course let others do the donating while you free ride and concentrate on the listening part. In this case, however, you should be warned that free riding is not the most popular of behaviors, and that notorious free riders are generally not welcome in most group contexts. In the real world, whenever it is possible to monitor and sanction behavior, free riders are often expelled from groups, or group benefits are withheld from them. And when given the option in experimental public goods games, people often choose to exclude identified free riders from further participation in group activities also. As I said, free riders are not very popular. However, free riders are far from being the only ones who can be unpopular in public goods settings. Instead, they are surprisingly joined in infamy by those at the very opposite end of the selfishness-unselfishness spectrum; namely those who do not consume the public good, but unselfishly contribute towards its provision anyway! This surprising finding comes from a recent study by Craig Parks and Asako Stone, which shows participants in experimental public goods games to dislike playing with people who contribute beyond what they consume just as much as they dislike playing with those who free ride. The series of experiments, which can be found in this months Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, highlight data on the choice behavior of students made to participate in repeated computerized public goods games against simulated opponents. Not knowing that their opponents were software programs, participants were later provided fake information about the supposed behavior of each of the other group members; in addition to which they were also given the option to expel group members from participation in an upcoming round of the same public goods game. To the surprise of the researchers (who were initially investigating an entirely different phenomenon), participants tended towards playing against those who had contributed in equal proportion to what they were consuming. Both those who had contributed less than they consumed, as well as those who contributed more than they consumed were the most likely to be voted out of the group. To make sure this was not a mere statistical artifact, the researchers repeated similar studies which replicated the finding and added further insight into which processes could be driving the effect.These additional studies suggest that, although sanctions were given to unselfish contributors and free riders alike, the motivation for these sanctions were quite different in both cases: For example, the main reasons participants did not like playing with unselfish contributors seemed to be that a) participants did not like how they themselves compared to unselfish contributors, and b) participants viewed unselfish contributors as “rule breakers” who were not adhering to the “appropriate norms” for the public goods setting. In comparison, free riders were rejected as future playing partners, mostly on grounds of the argument that they were being asocial or “destructive”. As mentioned, the finding comes as somewhat of a surprise, but the researchers see it as fitting nicely with similar research which shows that exceptional individuals are often disliked. For example the authors cite research which shows that we often dislike those who are extremely competent, tend to get upset with those who offer help, and also reject those who succeed in standing their ground on moral issues. So disliking those who unselfishly contribute to our cause might not be that unusual after all. Parks and Stone offer different reasons for their findings, which relate to the different motivations that people report for disliking unselfish group members: “Regarding those who emphasize the social comparative aspect of the benevolent other, there is evidence that, within a group task setting, social comparison tends to induce feelings of inter- personal competition. People feel driven to outdo the group member who is setting the standard. In a setting such as ours, the standard being set by the benevolent other is to give up a considerable amount of personal resources and receive only a small payoff in return. To compete with such a person means that one would need to give even more and take even less, not a very desirable prospect. Removal of this person would eliminate that competitive standard. ..” Regarding those who would sanction unselfish contributors because of perceived norm violations, Parks and Stone offer that, “research on norm deviance shows that antinorm ingroup members are dealt with harshly, because they represent a threat to the stability of the group norm, and that others see removal as an effective method of dealing with the problem. From a norm deviance perspective, then, the benevolent other would look like someone who has the potential to shift the norm away from equity and in an undesirable direction, and an effective way to deal with such a person is to remove him or her from the group.” Remains to say that popularity is – of course – not everything… Main Reference: Craig D. Parks, Asako B. Stone (2010). The Desire to Expel Unselfish Members From the Group Journal of Personality and Social Psychology : DOI: 10.1037/a0018403 added by: animalia_libero

M.I.A.’s ‘XXXO’ Video Hits The Web

Hype Williams-directed clip is much tamer than her controversial ‘Born Free’ video. By Nuzhat Naoreen M.I.A. Photo: Roger Kisby/ Getty Images When it comes to M.I.A., we expect a certain degree of controversy. After all, the singer is no stranger to releasing songs and videos packaged with a message. So when her “XXXO” video hit the Net on Wednesday (August 11), we were understandably surprised. The Hype Williams-directed clip for “XXXO,” which, as the title implies, is about being in love (although not necessarily happily), is a marked departure from her “Born Free” video. While “Born Free” set off a firestorm of criticism for its violence, “XXXO” is much tamer in nature and much more hypnotic in style. M.I.A. is front and center in the video, which has an ’80s feel and relies heavily on graphics of hearts and flowers. In fact, the video appears to put M.I.A. inside a digital greeting card — although her look in the video is much more seductive, as she wears her hair loose and wavy and packs on the thick red lipstick. Of course, the video is not completely without political symbolism. The artist, who previously showed her support for the Tamil Tigers with her song “Paper Planes,” also features two tigers. While the video for “XXXO” only premiered Wednesday, M.I.A.’s fans are likely already familiar with the song. A remix of the song featuring Jay-Z was released back in June, and the artist herself put out the original track (along with the rest of her album ) on her MySpace page in July. Have you seen the “XXXO” clip? What do you think of it? Let us know in the comments! Related Artists M.I.A.

Excerpt from:
M.I.A.’s ‘XXXO’ Video Hits The Web