Tag Archives: race

NBC’s O’Donnell Casts GOP Primary Winner As a Sexist

Democratic Senator Michael Bennet got his own live spot on Wednesday’s Today show to make his pitch to Colorado voters, but his Republican opponent only got a brief soundbite, that came after a clip of him that put him in a negative, even sexist light. While Today co-anchor Ann Curry chatted live with Bennet in the first half hour, NBC’s Kelly O’Donnell only gave Republican candidate Ken Buck a few seconds in her report on yesterday’s primary races: KELLY O’DONNELL: Winning on the Republican side – career prosecutor Ken Buck who had said this on the trail. KEN BUCK: Why should you vote for me? Because I do not wear high heels. O’DONNELL: Former Lieutenant Governor Jane Norton was the establishment choice, but the Tea Party picked Buck. Do you think of yourself as a Tea Party candidate? BUCK: I think of myself as a grassroots candidate and the Tea Parties are certainly part of that grassroots effort. O’Donnell never gave Buck the chance to explain to the country that his comment/joke came in response to Norton criticism of his candidacy, as he told CBS News’ Bob Orr : “My opponent has said a number of times on the campaign trail that people should vote for her because she wears high heels, because she wears a skirt, because she’s a woman…She ran a commercial that said Ken Buck should be man enough to do X, Y, and Z…I made a statement, it was a lighthearted statement that I’m man enough, I don’t wear high heels and I have cowboy boots on.” By not airing Buck’s clarification and pointing out that the “Tea Party picked Buck,” O’Donnell left Today viewers with the impression that Tea Party voters had just favored the sexist candidate in the race. In contrast Buck’s Democratic opponent in the fall got a full interview segment to make his case to Colorado voters. The following is Curry’s interview with Bennet as it was aired on the August 11 Today show: ANN CURRY: Washington has been keeping an especially close eye on the primary results in Colorado. As we mentioned Democratic Senator Michael Bennet, who had the backing of President Obama, won his party’s primary while setting up a November showdown with Tea Party backed Republican Ken Buck. We’ve got Senator Bennet this morning, joining us this morning. Hello Senator, good morning, and congratulations. [On screen headline: “Rocky Mountain Race, Obama Picks Wins Colorado Senate Primary”] SEN. MICHAEL BENNET: Good morning. Thank you. Thanks for having me today. CURRY: You know, your race fueled this idea that President Obama might not be such an asset on the campaign trail as it, as he was two years ago. Now, this morning after your victory, and it looks like you won pretty handily in looking at the numbers with 100 percent of precincts reporting, you, you won more than a 54 percent of the vote. What do you want to say about President Obama as his, in terms of his being an asset on the campaign trail? BENNET: You know, I’m very pleased to have had his support but I don’t think it made the difference in the primary and won’t make the difference in the general. The content of what I hear in my town hall meetings has never been further away from what we’re hearing on our television sets than it is today. People are focused on how we get out of the most savage economy since the Great Depression. And I think, you know, the politics in Washington and the, and the political conversation we’re hearing on TV these days is not particularly responsive to that and, and we have spoken to that and I think that’s why we were successful in the primary and will be in the general. CURRY: Well so if you’re saying that it wasn’t necessarily what put you over the top, was it, would you have considered it a hindrance? I mean how would you describe the usefulness of President Obama being with you on the campaign trail, in some part, to your campaign? BENNET: I certainly wouldn’t describe it as a hindrance and I also don’t think it made the difference. I don’t think it was material to most primary voters. CURRY: Right. In your victory speech, to the point you were making earlier, you said that, quote, “Washington has a lot to learn from Colorado.” Exactly what do you mean by that, Senator? BENNET: Look we, even before we were in the worst recession since the Great Depression, if you look at the last period of economic growth, it’s the first time in our history that our economy grew and middle class income fell. That’s never happened before. So families in Colorado are earning $1,000 less at the end of the decade than they were at the beginning. The cost of health insurance has gone up by 97 percent. Their cost of higher education has gone up by over 50 percent. People are struggling to figure out how to make sure that we’re not the first generation of Americans to leave less opportunity, not more, to our kids and our grandkids. That’s what people in Colorado are focused on. CURRY: Well alright. I think we’re gonna have to leave that as the last word. There will be a lot of questions, more to come as I’m sure you face this general election. Senator Michael Bennet, thank you so much this morning. BENNET: Thank you. Thanks, thanks for not asking me any wrestling questions. CURRY: Okay. You bet. You can count on that. BENNET: Alright.

More:
NBC’s O’Donnell Casts GOP Primary Winner As a Sexist

Chris Matthews: Do Republicans Oppose Obama Because of His Race?

Chris Matthews on Friday actually asked a GOP Congressman if Republicans oppose President Obama because of his race. On the 5PM installment of MSNBC’s “Hardball,” Matthews brought on Rep. Bob Inglis, the Congressman from South Carolina who easily lost his primary fight in June to Tea Party candidate Trey Gowdy and has been badmouthing his Party ever since. Early in the conversation, Matthews asked, “What is it that`s gotten into your Party`s water supply, the Republican Party`s water supply, that makes them strangely hostile to the president, not just against his policies, but personally? Is it race?” Fixated on racial conspiracy theories, the “Hardball” host later in the interview asked, “If we had about a million Heide Klums trying to cross the border, the Mexican border of the United States, you know, the gorgeous blond from Germany or whatever, do you think that would be a problem with immigration right now, or is it really just ethnic?” (video follows with partial transcript and commentary): CHRIS MATTHEWS, HOST: Welcome back to HARDBALL. After voting for TARP and telling voters not to listen to Glenn Beck too much, South Carolina Republican Congressman Bob Inglis was outvoted in his primary this year. Now he`s offering up some very honest advice for his party and some very scary stories from his time on the trail. Here`s how Mr. Inglis described one campaign donor meeting to David Corn at “Mother Jones” — quote — “They say, `Bob, what don`t you get? Barack Obama is a socialist, communist, Marxist, who wants to destroy the American economy, so he can take over as dictator. Health care is part of that, and he wants to open up the Mexican border and turn the United States into a Muslim nation.`” Congressman Inglis joins us tonight from Greenville, South Carolina. Well, that was a funny conversation. Somebody actually thought that the Muslims would be pouring over the Mexican border. The Rio Grande protects us from Islam. These people have got a problem. (LAUGHTER) REP. BOB INGLIS (R), SOUTH CAROLINA: I guess so. It`s — I think it`s generally not seen as a Muslim nation, but — Mexico isn`t. MATTHEWS: Well, what is — what is — let`s talk about the conspiracy theories. What is it that`s gotten into your party`s water supply, the Republican Party`s water supply, that makes them strangely hostile to the president, not just against his policies, but personally? Is it race? Later in the conversation, Matthews actually said the following: MATTHEWS: I can`t resist asking this. I got to ask this question. If we had about a million Heide Klums trying to cross the border, the Mexican border of the United States, you know, the gorgeous blond from Germany or whatever, do you think that would be a problem with immigration right now, or is it really just ethnic? The people from a different ethnic background. If Heidi Klum, by the million, was trying to cross the border, I figure a lot of guys would be down there welcoming her personally. What`s your view? I want to make this a little ludicrous because I think it`s obvious it`s ethnic. And I want people just to admit it. So, in Matthews’ distorted view, Republicans oppose Obama’s policies because of his race, and Americans that are against illegal immigration only feel this way because those coming across the border are Mexican. And this guy has his own show on a cable news network. Tough to believe, isn’t it?

Read more from the original source:
Chris Matthews: Do Republicans Oppose Obama Because of His Race?

Matthews Whacked Fox for Being ‘Stooges’ for Senate Candidates, But What About MSNBC’s Senate Shilling?

On Tuesday night’s Hardball, Chris Matthews theorized (confessing he didn’t really have evidence) that GOP candidates like Sharron Angle get to pre-screen their questions before appearing on Fox News. He concluded: “How far will these candidates go in expecting the networks, especially Fox in the case of the right wing, to do their bidding and set them up as basically stooges, asking pre-arranged questions, pre-arranged answers?” Matthews mocked Angle’s chutzpah that interviews should be fundraising opportunities. It’s a little mysterious that MSNBC would get on a high horse for offering repeated bites at the publicity apple for Senate candidates. Take the case of Bill Halter, the staunch leftist who challenged Sen. Blanche Lincoln (D.-Ark.) in a primary for not supporting a socialist “public option” in the health-care debate. From March through the June 8 primary, MSNBC hosted Halter in ten interviews (on programs included in the Nexis transcript database), including seven on The Ed Show, one on The Rachel Maddow Show (on March 3), one on Hardball (on March 12), one on Andrea Mitchell Reports on primary day (June 8).  Don’t like candidates repeating their websites on air, MSNBC? Halter did on the Ed Show. Here’s May 19:  SCHULTZ: Governor, you have gotten the grass roots support, I mean overwhelming compared to your opponent. Is it going to be there between now and June 8th? Can you count on the same people that got you close last night to close the deal for you? HALTER: Well, Ed, I`m just going to ask them right now. Go to billhalter.com. Our average contribution has been $30. That`s something that people across Arkansas and across the United States can do, and I can guarantee you this, we`re going to put that money to good use. Actually, it happened again on that night:  SCHULTZ: Adam, what if the progressive movement in this country can`t pull it off in Arkansas? Would this be a big setback? Because I see this as a real turning point right here. I mean, she is the first corporate Democratic senator that fought hard against health care reform. I don`t think she held insurance`s feet to the fire at all. If she is successful, is that a real blow to the progressive movement? ADAM GREEN: Sure. Any loss would be a blow to any movement. But we`re going to win, and here`s why we`re going to win. One by-product of the fact that she has taken millions and millions of dollars from big corporations is that she really has no grassroots support here on the ground. You can feel it. Meanwhile, thousands of thousands of people are chipping in with their time and their money to Bill Halter, either at BillHalter.com or on our website, BoldProgressives.org. Halter also did two website plugs on the Ed Show of May 24:  SCHULTZ: The latest Research 2000 poll shows you were slightly ahead of the Senator, 48-46. Is it going to be this close all the way? What do you think? HALTER: I think it will be close, but I believe that we`re headed for a victory on June 8th. Certainly, we have all the momentum, Ed. We`ve seen that all over the state. SCHULTZ: Do you have the money? HALTER: We can always use help, Ed. BillHalter.com for anybody who wants to help out. SCHULTZ: But right now do you have the money? HALTER: Well, we`ve got enough to get our ads up, but we can always use more. SCHULTZ: Well, what about her war chest? She doesn`t seem to have the grassroots the way you do. HALTER: No, that`s true. But she`s had six years to raise money, and so she banked over $8 million. We`ve out-raised Senator Lincoln ever since we got in the race, but she just had a big head start. Of course, she spent a lot of that money, too. But we could use everybody`s help, $10, $20, $30. BillHalter.com is the place to go . The Ed Show dates for Halter were March 2, March 5, March 31, May 14, May 19, May 24, and June 2.  But Matthews called Sharron Angle’s grinning insistence to Cameron on fundraising plugs in her interviews as “the most incredible 26 seconds of television history for a very long time.” That’s obviously a very slanted lesson in TV history.

See the rest here:
Matthews Whacked Fox for Being ‘Stooges’ for Senate Candidates, But What About MSNBC’s Senate Shilling?

Disgraced USDA Official Blames Fox News and Tea Party For Her Dismissal

The USDA employee that was forced to resign Monday as a result of racist comments she made at an NAACP gathering in March has blamed Fox News and the Tea Party for her inability to convince her employers of her innocence. As NewsBusters reported Tuesday, Shirley Sherrod, the USDA’s Rural Development director for the state of Georgia, delivered a racism-laden address at the NAACP’s 20th Annual Freedom Fund Banquet back on March 27. On CNN’s “American Morning” Tuesday, after Sherrod said that the video published by Big Government didn’t accurately depict what really happened, host John Roberts asked, “When the U.S. Department of Agriculture came to you and said you have to step down, why didn’t you just say, wait a minute, you don’t know the full story?” Sherrod amazingly answered, “I did say that, but they, for some reason, the stuff that Fox and the Tea Party does is scaring the administration” (video follows with transcript and commentary): JOHN ROBERTS: Just a little while ago, we’re telling you the story of Shirley Sherrod, the U.S. Department of Agriculture official from Georgia who resigned after charges that she made racist comments before the NAACP because she said she wouldn’t help a farmer because he was white. That was one side of the story. We got the other side of the story from Shirley Sherrod coming up right after the break. She says it’s nothing of what people are saying it was. So, let’s hear from her coming right up. Fifty minutes after the hour. (COMMERCIAL BREAK) ROBERTS: The U.S. Department of Agriculture accepts the resignation of an employee after a video surfaced showing her telling an audience that she withheld assistance to a white farmer because of his race. Let’s listen to what she told the NAACP. (BEGIN VIDEOTAPE) SHIRLEY SHERROD, FMR. USDA WORKER: I was struggling with the fact that so many black people had lost their farm land. And here I was faced with having to help a white person save their land. So, I didn’t give him the full force of what I could do. I did enough. (END VIDEO CLIP) KIRAN CHETRY: Does that video tell the whole story? Joining us now on the phone from Albany, Georgia is Shirley Sherrod, herself. Thanks for being with us this morning, Shirley. SHERROD: Thank you. CHETRY: You say that this was part of the story and that it was part that was spliced enough to show you in a bad light, that this isn’t the whole story. Will you finish for us how this ended? SHERROD: OK. I was speaking to that group like I’ve done many groups, and I tell them about a time when I thought the issue was race and race only. And I tell them the story of how I’ve worked with a white farmer back in 1986. I was not working for the Department of Agriculture. I was working with a non-profit organization assisting farmers throughout South Georgia and the Southeast. And this farmer came to me for help. I was telling the story about how working with him helped me to see that the issue is not about race, it’s about those who have versus those who do not have. And I tell how I took him to a lawyer who I thought would help him. In the end, that lawyer didn’t. In the end, I had to frantically look for a lawyer because when USDA lifted — I’m sorry. When the court lifted the injunction against USDA in May of 1987, this white farmer was one of 13 that was foreclosed on by the state of Georgia. I had to frantically find a lawyer who would file a chapter 11 to stop the foreclosure. He couldn’t — at that time, we had up to 12. CHETRY: Yes. But let me just get back really quickly, you said you didn’t give them the full force of what you could do. You said you did enough, and then you referred to the race (ph) of the lawyer as well saying that perhaps because the lawyer was white, that he would help him. So, what did you mean by that? SHERROD: What I meant was, I didn’t know anyone else, but it thought taking — I didn’t know another lawyer at that time who was local, who knew something about chapter 12. But I thought if I took him to a white lawyer, he would definitely do all that he could to help save his farm. ROBERTS: Miss Sherrod, let’s make it clear though, that this happened 24 years ago. You eventually worked with this white farmer. You eventually became friends, you say, with the farmer and his wife. SHERROD: Yes. ROBERTS: So, the question I have is, when the U.S. Department of Agriculture came to you and said you have to step down, why didn’t you just say, wait a minute, you don’t know the full story. Here’s the full story, why should I step down? SHERROD: I did say that, but they, for some reason, the stuff that Fox and the Tea Party does is scaring the administration. I told them get the whole tape and look at the whole tape and look at how I tell people we have to get beyond race and start working together. ROBERTS: Many people at home might be thinking if you’re recounting an old story, why did you succumb to pressure to step down, why didn’t you fight this? SHERROD: If I tried to fight it and didn’t have any support from the U.S. Department of Agriculture, what would I do? CHETRY: Let me ask you this. Did you talk to the NAACP about it because I just want to read from our audience what Ben Jealous, the president said. He said referring to you and this surfacing of the tape, “her actions were shameful. While she went on to explain in the story, she ultimately realized her mistake as well as the common predicament of working people of all races. She gave no indication she’d attempted to right the wrong she had done to this man. And the reaction from many in the audience is disturbing.” This is from Ben Jealous. Did you try to clarify with the NAACP your story? SHERROD: No, I haven’t had had a chance to talk to anyone. All of this was happening so fast. And it’s unfortunate that the NAACP would make a statement without even checking to see what happened. This was 24 years ago, and I’m telling a story to try to unite people with that now. ROBERTS: Certainly, you’re coming out and telling your story now takes it to a different level, and obviously, we’re going to keep following this. It’s good to get your side of it. Sherri Sherrod, former Agriculture Department official. Thanks for joining us this morning. And perhaps, we can get you back on again, get your face on TV as well and talk to you more about this as the story continues to develop. SHERROD: I don’t mind. ROBERTS: All right. Thanks so much. CHETRY: Thanks a lot. So let’s get this straight: her employers at the USDA don’t believe her story and NEITHER does the NAACP. But didn’t you get the sense Chetry and Roberts did and were quite sympathetic?  For the record, here’s Monday’s press release from the NAACP: (BALTIMORE, MD) NAACP President and CEO Benjamin Todd Jealous issued the following statement today after learning of the resignation of Shirley Sherrod of the United States Department of Agriculture: “Since our founding in 1909, the NAACP has been a multi-racial, multi-faith organization that– while generally rooted in African American communities– fights to end racial discrimination against all Americans. We concur with US Agriculture Secretary Vilsack in accepting the resignation of Shirley Sherrod for her remarks at a local NAACP Freedom Fund banquet. Racism is about the abuse of power. Sherrod had it in her position at USDA. According to her remarks, she mistreated a white farmer in need of assistance because of his race. We are appalled by her actions, just as we are with abuses of power against farmers of color and female farmers. Her actions were shameful. While she went on to explain in the story that she ultimately realized her mistake, as well as the common predicament of working people of all races, she gave no indication she had attempted to right the wrong she had done to this man. The reaction from many in the audience is disturbing. We will be looking into the behavior of NAACP representatives at this local event and take any appropriate action. We thank those who brought this to our national office’s attention, as there are hundreds of local fundraising dinners each year. Sherrod’s behavior is even more intolerable in light of the US Department of Agriculture’s well documented history of denying opportunities to African American, Latino, Asian American, and Native American farmers, as well as female farmers of all races. Currently, justice for many of these farmers is being held up by Congress. We would hope all who share our outrage at Sherrod’s statements would join us in pushing for these cases to be remedied. The NAACP will continue to advance the ideals of America and fight for freedom, justice and fairness for all Americans.” Regardless of the conclusions made by the USDA and the NAACP, is the media template going to be that Sherrod’s actions took place 24 years ago, and she was wrongfully forced to resign as a result of pressure from Fox News and the Tea Party? Will Sherrod be made out as the victim by a sympathetic press? Stay tuned. 

Go here to see the original:
Disgraced USDA Official Blames Fox News and Tea Party For Her Dismissal

Justin Bieber Beats Lady Gaga In YouTube Video Popularity — For Now …

‘Baby’ has surpassed ‘Bad Romance’ in views, but the battle continues. By Gil Kaufman Justin Bieber Photo: Mark Von Holden/ WireImage Lady Gaga has been on an epic, record-setting tear, packing ’em in at concerts, selling millions of records and recently smashing previous marks for downloads, Facebook fans and total online video views . But a girl can’t have it all, right? After a heated battle, Gaga went down in rare defeat on Thursday, when Justin Bieber surpassed her to set a record for the most-watched music video in YouTube history. At press time, Bieber’s “Baby” collabo with Ludacris had logged 245,746,720 views, pushing past Gaga’s epic “Bad Romance” clip, which was not far behind with 245,596,709. Now, given Gaga’s rabid fanbase of little monsters, there’s no doubt this pitched battle will continue and perhaps see a few more lead changes, but for now, the Biebs has emerged victorious. Bieber, in the midst of doctor-imposed vocal rest while on tour, reacted to the news with delight, tweeting on Thursday, “what is goin on with the ‘Baby’ video on YouTube is crazy … I started on YouTube so the support … well I just need to say thank u.” Showing he was raised right and is a good sport, he followed that tweet with a flip of his bowl cut to his rival, writing, “someone just showed me and I just need to say that @ladygaga is an incredible artist who have great respect 4. And her vid is incredible … so it doesn’t matter who has more views, what matters is that we have incredible fans that support us … that I’m sure we are both grateful 4.” Then again, winning feels kinda sweet, so he did do a bit of Twitter victory lap. “So thanks … like I said, I started on YouTube so … WOW!! Love u and wish u all the best in each and every one of ur lives. Thanks Beliebers!” And in case the race got close again, his next post was a link to the video. Trailing way behind on the list of most-watched music videos on YouTube are: Miley Cyrus’ “Party in the U.S.A.” (138.6 million), Pitbull’s “I Know You Want Me (Calle Ocho)” (131.8 million), Miley Cyrus’ “7 Things” (125.2 million), Lady Gaga’s “Just Dance” (117 million), Shakira’s “Waka Waka (This Time for Africa)” (101.7 million), Miley Cyrus’ “The Climb” (100.1 million), Vanessa Hudgens’ “Say OK” (89.1 million) and Timbaland and OneRepublic’s “Apologize” (87.4 million). What’s your favorite music video of all time? Write in your comments below. Related Videos Top 10 Most Popular YouTube Music Videos Related Photos YouTube Domination: Top 10 All-Time Artists Related Artists Justin Bieber Lady Gaga

Read this article:
Justin Bieber Beats Lady Gaga In YouTube Video Popularity — For Now …

ABC Hypes NAACP Indictment of Tea Party as Racist, a Smear the Network Stoked

Four months after ABC’s World News spent a weekend defaming anti-ObamaCare Tea Party protesters as “very ugly” with “ reports of racial and homophobic slurs ,” citing “protesters roaming Washington, some of them increasingly emotional, yelling slurs and epithets ,” Tuesday’s newscast, unlike those on CBS and NBC, credentialed the NAACP ‘s charge that the “Tea Party movement is a threat to the pursuit of human rights, justice and equality for all.” Sans any ideological label, anchor Diane Sawyer set up the full July 13 story: “The nation’s oldest civil rights organization, the NAACP , has just adopted a resolution this evening at its annual convention condemning quote, ‘racist behavior by Tea Party members.’” Reporter Dan Harris relayed: The NAACP points to the racial epithets allegedly hurled at black members of Congress by Tea Party members during the health care debate and to the racist signs that critics say they spotted at Tea Party events to support its conclusion that the “Tea Party movement is a threat to the pursuit of human rights, justice and equality for all.” Going to a Tea Party leader who is black, Harris pressed: “We’ve all seen the signs. There have been signs that compare Baarck Obama to a monkey, there have been signs that have had the ‘n’ word on them. When you see those signs, how do you feel?” Harris, however, did at least quote Sarah Palin’s tweet asking: “Are liberty-loving, equality-respecting patriots racist?” And, citing an ABC News/Washington Post survey, he noted “the biggest reasons people join the Tea Party are politics and ideology, rather than views on race.” Earlier NB item on Tuesday afternoon about an ABCNews.com post headlined: “Michelle Obama Rouses NAACP Before Vote Condemning ‘Racist’ Elements of Tea Party” Back in March, NB archive: Saturday, March 20 : “ABC: Anti-ObamaCare Protest ‘Turned Very Ugly’ with ‘Racial and Homophobic Slurs’” Sunday, March 21 : “ABC’s Sawyer: ‘Protesters Roaming’ DC, ‘Increasingly Emotional, Yelling Slurs and Epithets’” Plus, from March 21 : “CBS: ‘Mean from the Start’ Health Debate ‘Turned Even Nastier Yesterday’ with ‘Racial Epithets’ and ‘Sexual Slurs’” From the Tuesday, July 13 ABC World News: DIANE SAWYER: Also on politics, a controversy surrounding the Tea Party. The nation’s oldest civil rights organization, the NAACP, has just adopted a resolution this evening at its annual convention condemning quote, “racist behavior by Tea Party members.” Tonight, the   Tea Party is fighting back and here’s Dan Harris. DAN HARRIS: The NAACP points to the racial epithets allegedly hurled at black members of Congress by Tea Party members during the health care debate and to the racist signs that critics say they spotted at Tea Party events to support its conclusion that the “Tea Party movement is a threat to the pursuit of human rights, justice and equality for all.” At the group’s annual meeting in Kansas City, the resolution had plenty of support. UNIDENTIFIED MAN: When we turn on the television and see posters and fliers that send very frightening messages to our community, we have to address it. HARRIS: Tea Party favorite Sarah Palin called the resolution “divisive,” asking today on Twitter: “Are liberty-loving, equality-respecting patriots racist?” David Webb is the co-founder of the New York City Tea Party. DAVID WEBB, TEA PARTY 365: I think the NAACP, in its march towards irrelevancy as an organization, needs an enemy to maintain its power base. HARRIS, TO WEBB: Let me push you a little bit. WEBB: Sure. HARRIS, TO WEBB: We’ve all seen the signs. There have been signs that compare Baarck Obama to a monkey, there have been signs that have had the “n” word on them. When you see those signs, how do you feel? WEBB: They’re offensive. They don’t belong there, but there will always be fringe elements. HARRIS: The biggest reasons people join the Tea Party are politics and ideology, rather than views on race. But today, the NAACP rejected the charge that it’s playing politics. BENJAMIN TODD JEALOUS, PRESIDENT, NAACP: We have no problem with the Tea Party, we have a problem with the Tea Party tolerating racists in their ranks. HARRIS: This race-based fight shows no signs of letting up. The NAACP is planning an anti-Tea Party march on Washington this fall. Dan Harris, ABC News, New York.

Read more from the original source:
ABC Hypes NAACP Indictment of Tea Party as Racist, a Smear the Network Stoked

‘The Lottery’ Exposes Truth About Public Schools

The children eager to attend Harlem Success Academies don’t care about partisan politics or ideological turf wars. They just want the best education possible. “ The Lottery ,” a new documentary by Madeleine Sackler, showcases families desperate for an alternative to the New York Public School system. The film, playing an exclusive engagement through July 15 at the Starz FilmCenter in Denver , follows four such families who enter a lottery system so their children can attend a prestigious charter school. Strip away the interpersonal dynamics and you’ll find a full-throated argument on behalf of charter schools. And those who think only Republicans support school choice measures will be surprised to see a large  number of Democrats eager to give charter schools a try. It’s an alternately fascinating and maddening film experience, and Sackler delivers the material with an elegant touch. It’s also a must-see for parents with school-age children – or just taxpayers saddened at the thought of children not reaching their potential. The families included here put a human face on the issue, but the film would be better served if we got to know them a little better. The quick glimpses at their lives – and dreams – tell us just enough about the stakes at play. Sackler intersperses sobering statistics throughout her film, showing how the charter schools in question offers a major upgrade from the status quo. But the film’s twin highlights come when Eva Moskowitz, the articulate founder of Harlem Success Academies, takes on her critics at two public forums. Viewers may lunge for their blood pressure meds as union lackeys play fast and loose with the facts, and double down on the race card, in order to defend a broken system. “The Lottery” is the second recent documentary to slam teachers unions. “The Cartel” examined New Jersey’s disgraceful public school system, blaming unions for much of the waste and horrific grades. “Waiting for Superman,” another documentary trumpeting the need for educational reform, will be released this fall. It’s hardly an accident. Parents are fed up with the sorry state of modern education and see school choice as a possible way out. And documentary filmmakers are following suit. “The Lottery” doesn’t traffic in the bait-and-switch stylings of a Michael Moore opus, but it’s still a one-sided affair. It isn’t entirely Sackler’s fault. The director recently told this critic she tried – and tried – to include union backers in the film for an entire year. But those sources refused to participate. Still, more neutral education experts might have added context to the arguments on display. And while Moskowitz is an ideal spokeswoman for the charter system, she’s given too much screen time given her intimate connection to the school in question. “The Lottery” is the kind of film that could very well change some stubborn hearts and minds. Political ideology – and knee-jerk sympathies – fall aside when you see families crying in relief as their names are plucked from “The Lottery.” Crossposted at Big Hollywood

View original post here:
‘The Lottery’ Exposes Truth About Public Schools

Richard Dreyfuss Heads to Weeds

If you were wondering which of the 5 Movieline-approved stars would be the first to pull ahead in the race to be the next Betty White, here’s your answer: Richard Dreyfuss. The veteran actor has signed on for four episodes of Weeds to play an “unexpected character” from Nancy Botwin’s (Mary Louise-Parker) past. So, her father. Also guest starring on the Showtime series this season: Mark Paul-Gosselaar, Alanis Morissette, Jennifer Jason Leigh, Peter Stormare and Linda Hamilton. Talk about a motley crew. [ TV by the Numbers ]

See the rest here:
Richard Dreyfuss Heads to Weeds

MSNBC Scarborough Slams Republican Sharron Angle as a ‘Jackass’

On Tuesday’s edition of “Morning Joe,” Joe Scarborough and his panel discussed the 2010 midterm elections and trashed Republican candidate Sharron Angle as a “mental patient” and a “jackass.”   The conversation, which included Chris Matthews and Mike Barnicle, began innocently enough when MSNBC contributor Mike Halperin said Angle is “vulnerable” in the race because “she has extreme positions that are out of step with the mainstream.” One doesn’t have to be fan of Angle’s to question the rude, demeaning outbreaks hurled in her direction.   Barnicle boldly stated that Angle was “embarrassing” to the residents of Nevada and ” sounds like a mental patient .” After this incident, Chris Matthews began to misquote Angle’s radio interview with Lars Larson asserting, “She understands why people think of and resort to second amendment solutions to the Democrats in Congress they don’t like.”   Here’s the actual quote in full: You know, our Founding Fathers, they put that Second Amendment in there for a good reason and that was for the people to protect themselves against a tyrannical government. And in fact, you know, Thomas Jefferson said it’s good for a country to have a revolution every 20 years.