Tag Archives: radio

Ke$ha Is ‘So Grateful’ For VMA Nominations

‘I can’t even put into words actually how much this means to me,’ the ‘Tik Tok’ singer tweets. By Jocelyn Vena Ke$ha in “Blah Blah Blah” Photo: Sony Music Ke$ha bounced onto the scene in 2009 with her raucous pop tune “Tik Tok,” and she quickly infected the world with her bouncy dance tunes and in-your-face attitude. Now, she’s up for three awards at the 2010 MTV Video Music Awards , where she will try her best to take home a Moonman or two. On Tuesday (August 3), the singer tweeted her overwhelming excitement about the nominations: “Holy sh–!!!!!!!!3 VMA nominations…!!! I don’t even know what to say. I’m so grateful and thankful and stunned and excited. I can’t even put into words actually how much this means to me; ) thank you to every single one of my fans.. !!!!!!!! I’m f—ing losing my sh–. I’m so stoked!!!!!” Ke$ha’s “Tik Tok” is up for Best Female Video, Best New Artist and Best Pop Video. She is also nominated with her pals 3OH!3 for their song “My First Kiss” in the Best Collaboration category. On Ryan Seacrest’s radio show Tuesday morning, the singer first heard about her nominations, saying, “I’m going to pee myself. I’m bouncing around my hotel room. This is the best day ever. … I want to pee on something. I’m so scared. What do I wear? That means people like me! I’ve been working so hard for this. I’m so excited. This is the happiest day of my life, so far.” She tweeted about her radio reaction, saying, “You can hear me lose my sh– this morning with Ryan Seacrest… lol. I kinda flipped.” Which Moonman do you think Ke$ha should win? Tell us in the comments! The 27th annual MTV Video Music Awards will be broadcast live from the Nokia Theatre in Los Angeles on Sunday, September 12, at 9 p.m. ET. Fans can go to VMA.MTV.com (or text VMA to 97979 if they are Verizon subscribers) to vote for the winners in general categories, including Best New Artist, from Tuesday (August 3) through September 12. Related Artists Ke$ha

Read the original here:
Ke$ha Is ‘So Grateful’ For VMA Nominations

Taylor Swift Announces New Album Title, Release Date

Following an incredible 2009, Taylor Swift took some time off . But the singer is ready to take the music world by storm again, and has announced details for her upcoming album: It will be titled “Speak Now.” It will be released on October 25. Why that title? Swift answer the question in a live Web chat today, telling fans it “pertains to the album as a concept, and as an entire theme of the record, more than I can even tell you.” Taylor added that she’s been penning singles for the album since “Fearless” came out in 2008. She said. “Thankfully, in the past two years I’ve experienced a lot of things that I’ve been dying to write about. A lot of things that I’ve wanted to say in the moment that I didn’t… Track by track, each song is a different confession to a different person.” The first song off the CD will hit the radio in mid-August. Titled “Mine,” Swift says it’s about “my tendency to run from love. It’s a recent tendency. Every example of love in my life has ended in goodbye. The song is about finding the exception to that.” We’re just sad that exception didn’t include Taylor Lautner . ** In other upcoming album news, David Archuleta has already revealed the released date for his next CD.

Go here to see the original:
Taylor Swift Announces New Album Title, Release Date

NPR Mourns Global Cooler-Turned-Global Warmer Scientist

Few seem to remember now, but throughout the 1970s, the advertised threat to society from global cooling was as prevalent as the current global warming alarmism. Publications including The New York Times, Time and Newsweek – the same ones hyping the dangers of a warming planet in 2010 – were warning about global cooling then . A prominent global cooler from that era has recently passed away. Stephen Schneider, a Stanford University climatologist and United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change member died in London on July 19 , as noticed on National Public Radio’s “All Things Considered.” (h/t Tim Graham ) In an interview with NPR’s Michele Norris, White House Science Adviser John Holdren remembered Schneider, not for getting the science wrong at first but for inventing this field of science, with its acknowledgement that mankind could change the climate. “Steve would come up with crucial insights that really opened up whole new dimensions of research in climate science,” Holdren said on the July 19 broadcast . “One of his big contributions was that the influences that humans were having on climate was not just the greenhouse gases, carbon dioxide and methane and others, but our influence also included the effects of particles. And he was sometimes criticized for being too extreme. But, in fact, he was very middle of the road. Steve was as fierce in his criticism of people who he thought were overstating what we know about climate as he was in his criticisms of those he thought were understating.” Holdren is a curious but perhaps appropriate individual for NPR to turn to in remembering the work on Schneider and his theory of human’s impacting nature extensively. In the 1970s, Holdren made his own controversial statements. In a 1973 book he co-authored with Paul R. Ehrlch and Anne H. Ehrlich, Holdren called for a “massive” campaign to “de-develop” the United States .  However, according to Holdren, Schneider saw the light and got on the global warming bandwagon – not because the theory of global cooling was proven false, but just because the theories were competing and global warming seemed to have won out. “In the early 1970s, everybody was in doubt as to the outcome of the competition between the cooling effects of particles and, on the other hand, the warming effect of greenhouse gases,” Holdren said. “And it was only with the emergence of additional data and additional analyses that it became clear that the greenhouse gases were going to win this competition. And at that point, he was one of the first to point out that, in fact, overall, we were heading for a much hotter world.” In 2007, the Business & Media Institute looked at news media coverage of climate change and found alarmism stretching back 100 years. BMI’s Special Report: Fire & Ice exposed the media’s warnings about impending climate doom during four different times in the last century switching from worries over global cooling to warming to cooling to warming again.

Link:
NPR Mourns Global Cooler-Turned-Global Warmer Scientist

Media Mocks Palin Over ‘Refudiate,’ But Obama Given Pass For Gaffes

George W. Bush’s linguistic difficulties , such as “Is our children learning,” “If the terriers and barrifs are torn down, this economy will grow” and “They misunderestimated me” made him the butt of many a joke back in the day, especially since they used to be played on cable news channels. Yet the current occupant of the White House—not to mention his vice president—does not seem to have found the media’s funnybone. Even Barack Obama’s teleprompter problems never got that kind of coverage, neither did that fact that his speeches are written at two grade levels below Bush. Then there was the time in Februrary, when Obama mispronuncicated “corpsman” as “corpse-man” and the media ignored it, or when he said he had been to 57 states and they excused it, the media has jumped all over Sarah Palin’s invention of the word “refudiate.” The word was coined on Fox News July 14, in response to the proposed Cordoba Center in New York City, a $100 million community center and Mosque three blocks from the World Trade Center site, but developed into a full-blown meme Sunday when she posted to Twitter: “Ground Zero Mosque supporters, doesn’t it stab you in the heart as it does ours throughout the heartland? Peaceful Muslims, pls refudiate.” The Los Angeles Times noted that the tweet was quickly edited to say “refute” instead of “refudiate,” writing “While not correct, ‘refute’ was a step up—it can actually be found in the dictionary.”  “Fergalicious,” “truthiness,” “blatherscythe,” “bloviate,” and “sternutation” can also be found in the dictionary—although one might need the unabridged Oxford English Dictionary for that last one. The merciless mocking of Palin by the mainstream media, which began when John McCain selected to be his running mate in 2008, has led to Keith Olbermann almost constantly calling her an “idiot” and a false item from a blog claiming she thought that Africa is a country. The same media outlets which have suddenly become such ardent defenders of the English language and attacked Palin with verbal vorpal blades, have never cared whenever Obama erred in his oratory, rarely bothering to post it in their blogs like they have done with “refudiate.” Jacob Heilbrun at The Huffington Post wrote “Palin isn’t simply trying to bring down big government, but the English language as well.” Liberals, of course, have never tried to coin new words, they just change the definitions of existing ones.

See the rest here:
Media Mocks Palin Over ‘Refudiate,’ But Obama Given Pass For Gaffes

Rick Ross Tells The Story Behind Drake’s Extended ‘Aston Martin Music’

Ross tells Mixtape Daily we might see the unofficial track on a Teflon Don re-release. By Shaheem Reid Rick Ross Photo: MTV News The O.D.: A Mixtape Daily Exclusive Rick Ross’ Teflon Don LP came out Tuesday (July 20), and by now, if you’ve been listening to the radio and the mixtapes, you’ve already heard the extended version of “Aston Martin Music,” a highlight of the project. The track features Chrisette Michele and Drake sharing hook duties. On the extended version, which is not on the album, Drake adds a rap verse. Ross stopped by our 1515 headquarters on Monday to explain Drizzy’s extra vocals. “It boils down to me having the idea, the concept,” Ross said. “Shout-out to J.U.S.T.I.C.E. League. I got the production from the J.U.S.T.I.C.E. League. I wanted to do something else, two-seater music. That’s what I like to call it when it’s personal music for you and that special female that’s riding shotgun in a two-seater. Chrisette Michele, she was on ‘Mafia Music 2.’ She came to Miami to film the video. I got her in the studio to do the first half of this idea I had, which is ‘Aston Martin Music.’ She was like, ‘What you mean just do half of the chorus?’ I was like, ‘Yeah, just do half. I’mma save the other half.’ ” Trusting Ross’ direction, the singer got in and laid the vocals we hear today: “Riding to the music, this is how we do it/ All night/ Racing down the freeway/ Just me and my baby/ In our ride.” “She loved the beat. She wrote her lyrics,” Ross continued of Michele’s session for “Aston Martin.” “It took her 10, 15 minutes to cut her vocals. I’m sitting there like, ‘Wow. All right, all right.’ At that point, I didn’t know who was gonna sing the second half.” The Bawse said listening to Drake’s new album, in his leisure time, inspired him to make that call to his friend from Toronto. “I sent it to the homie,” the Miami rap lord described. “He laced me. Right then, he was ready to jump on his verse. Right then, he was ready to cock and load. I was like, ‘I know you finishing your joint. Just give me that half a chorus, and I’mma make it do what it do. He loved the record. I got it back. He laced it at the point. When he heard [the finished version], it was magic. He was like, ‘I’m finnin’ to go in the studio, Ross. I’mma need to get on that.’ ” A version of the song with just an extended chorus and Drake’s verse called “Paris Morton Music” came out shortly after “Aston Martin Music” leaked to the Net almost two weeks ago. “I talk slicker than a pimp from Augusta,” Drake raps on the track. Then, one of Ross’ engineers mixed Drake’s verse and extended chorus with the album version of “AMM,” and that song has lived on the Net and mixtapes ever since. It’s also getting play on the radio. Ross said he has no problems with an unofficial extended version of “AMM” being out. He might even include it on a repackaging of Teflon Don in the future. “It’s only right,” Ross said. “I got on [Drake’s] first single [‘Find Your Love’]. He even put a twist on the title after some sexy ladies, I believe. It made it feel good. That’s what that music is about. On that re-release, that deluxe packaging, that’s what you may get. You never know.” For other artists featured in Mixtape Daily, check out Mixtape Daily Headlines or follow the Mixtape Daily team on Twitter: @shaheemreid and @mongosladenyc . Related Videos Mixtape Daily: Gucci Mane, Ron Artest

The rest is here:
Rick Ross Tells The Story Behind Drake’s Extended ‘Aston Martin Music’

Katy Perry Big Tits in a Bikini of the Day

I don’t understand Katy Perry’s career. I had the unfortunate experience this past weekend of being in a store where her song came on the radio and I was forced to listen to it. I couldn’t figure out if she was singing to 10 year old girls about bikinis and daisy dukes, but more importantly, I couldn’t figure out how she was even on the radio. The only thing she is good for is her tits. I think she knows that the rest of her is a sloppy fucking awkward mess….but sometimes….as Katy Perry proves pretty much always…big natural tits are all you need to make it… To See The Rest of the Pics – Follow This Link GO

Visit link:
Katy Perry Big Tits in a Bikini of the Day

Lady Gaga Will Be A Lollapalooza ‘Centerpiece,’ Perry Farrell Says

‘Her presentation is so overwhelming that some may overlook the music,’ he tells MTV Radio of over-the-top live show. By James Montgomery, with reporting by Sasha Hamrogue Lady Gaga Photo: George Pimentel/ WireImage Perry Farrell remembers Lady Gaga ‘s 2007 set at Lollapalooza, a sweaty, Saturday-afternoon affair that saw the then-brunet, yet-to-conquer-the-globe Gaga parade around in little more than a disco-ball bra and thigh-high stockings. He was impressed, but needless to say, he never thought he’d see the day she’d be headlining the fest. “I remember … she’s got dark-brown hair, she’s in a bikini, and she’s wearing thigh-highs and she’s sweating, because she was on at around 3 o’clock,” Farrell told MTV Radio. “Her music was cool, her show was kind of cool, but now, the production of her music, the people she’s surrounded herself with, the development of her stage show … it’s something that, when I think about Lollapalooza, in that gorgeous setting of [Chicago’s] Grant Park, with the amazing buildings all around us, lit up, I see her and her show as being as a centerpiece to the evening.” Yes, from side-stage curiosity to mainstage must-see, Gaga has come a long way in three short years, and Farrell — who’s already said that Lollapalooza will spend six figures to accommodate her massive Monster Ball stage — sees it as his obligation to help her continue on that climb. But he’s hoping the Lolla crowds won’t just focus on her stage show. After all, her music is pretty great too. “Her presentation is so overwhelming that some may overlook the music … but the truth is, her music, to me, is right where music should be. It’s on the cutting edge, but it’s [also] in the crosshairs of where every musician is aiming these days,” he said. “She’s this hybrid of Yoko Ono, sort of the Plastic Ono Band meets Madonna meets Elton John. She’s this beautiful crossing of those things [that] every musician is looking to find. Everyone’s looking for that sound, and I think she really hits it.” And though he realizes that not all Lolla fans are necessarily “little monsters,” he also hopes they’ll be won over by her set. After all, that’s sort of what Lollapalooza has been doing since it first started back in 1991: introducing kids to new artists, new scenes and, most importantly, new sounds. “We’re going to help her deliver it, just the way we did in 1991, when people didn’t go to rap concerts because they might be considered very dangerous,” he said. “[Back then,] a lot of those kids who went to Lollapalooza might not have seen Ice-T, but then, there he was. Same with Ice Cube. And that’s one of the things I guess I could say I pride myself in: I’m able to bring music that people are very curious about, and once they meet this music, they’ll really dig it.” What are you expecting from Lady Gaga’s Lolla set? Let us know in the comments! Related Photos Lady Gaga’s Homecoming Show At Madison Square Garden The Evolution Of: Lady Gaga Related Artists Lady Gaga Perry Farrell

Read more:
Lady Gaga Will Be A Lollapalooza ‘Centerpiece,’ Perry Farrell Says

Ed Schultz Meltdown: Harry Reid ‘Ball-less’ – Won’t Shove GOP Bastards Into Ditch

The desperation on the Left — as they realize November is going to be very bad for Democrats likely ending that “Hopey Changey Thingy” — is beginning to come to a boil. On Wednesday, liberal talker Ed Schultz had a full on meltdown during his radio program as he screamed, “To hell with the Republicans! They’re anti-American!” But that was just the start, for moments later, he called Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) “ball-less” once again shouting, “You won’t do the nuke option for the American people and shove the Republicans into the ditch! Shove those bastards right into the dirthole!” Apparently still speaking to Reid, Schultz said, “And if I’m too excited or too passionate for you, I’m giving you the finger right now! Because I don’t give a damn” (audio follows with transcript and commentary, h/t Twitter’s @secularstupiddd):  ED SCHULTZ: Do you think here in late July of 2010, after the 2008 election, almost two years, do you think the Democrats can finally get their freaking heads screwed on right and realize that the lefties put you in office to do something? To hell with the Republicans! They’re anti-American! They’re psycho talkers! They don’t care! How much focus has there been in the mainstream media about jobs being shipped overseas? Well, it’s happening on The Ed Show. I don’t know about anybody else’s on any other network or anywhere else. That’s the story! That’s where Americans are right now! Look, Democrats, I’m your best friend. I’ve been across the country. I take thousands of emails. Our team works 16 hours a day. We do a TV and we do a radio show. I’m trying to tell you what the hell’s going on! But you sit back, and Harry, you are ball-less! You won’t do the nuke option for the American people and shove the Republicans into the ditch! Shove those bastards right into the dirthole! This is about power! It’s about winning! It’s about saving American lives! That’s what this is about! And if I’m too excited or too passionate for you, I’m giving you the finger right now! Because I don’t give a damn! And oh by the way, the stimulus package isn’t working. That’s what O’Reilly and Ingraham, those two Nazis, are saying over on Fox News. Clearly, the panic on the Left is beginning to build. With less than four months to go before Election Day, and polls showing America’s anger at Obama and the Democrats growing by the hour, folks like Schultz know that their dream of a socialist United States is starting to crash and burn. As Brian Maloney wrote Thursday: All week, the big question has been whether Democrats are truly imploding, or simply projecting that image to reduce electoral expectations and create complacent Republicans. As on-air rants become more desperately hysterical than ever, liberal talkers are clearly building a case for the former. These guys are truly losing it. Indeed. Question is how bad will this get? As we near November, and the dream really starts turning into a nightmare, how much more unhinged will these libtalkers get? Stay tuned. 

See original here:
Ed Schultz Meltdown: Harry Reid ‘Ball-less’ – Won’t Shove GOP Bastards Into Ditch

Confused Matthews: How Can South Carolina GOPers Vote for a Indian-American But Not Support a Black President?

Chris Matthews, on Wednesday’s Hardball, invited on recently defeated Republican Representative Bob Inglis to slam Matthews’ favorite targets, namely the Tea Party, Rush Limbaugh and Sarah Palin and after he got the requisite criticisms out of the South Carolina congressman of those entities asked him if he could explain how primary voters from his own party could nominate an Indian-American like Nikki Haley, even though they’ve “got a problem with a black president?” Matthews, clearly not grasping the concept that perhaps voters in South Carolina could cast their ballot based out of purely ideological and not racial motives, asked Inglis the following question: How do you figure your state out? It’s pretty conservative obviously. It’s Strom Thurmond country in many ways and, and it has people like DeMint pretty far over and then people like Lindsey Graham who are sort of regular conservatives. But then you nominated, your party has nominated an Indian-American woman, Nikki Haley. Obviously an attractive candidate, she knows how to present herself obviously, but what’s that about? Is that just an interesting little aspect? It’s okay to be Indian-American but we’ve got a problem with this black president? What’s that about? Before Matthews ended his show on that stumper of a question, he egged on the soon to be former Representative Inglis to attack the Tea Party, Limbaugh and Palin, as seen in the following exchanges that were aired on the July 14 Hardball: CHRIS MATTHEWS: Well, the Tea Party has racked up big wins already in 2010. They scared Senator Arlen Specter out of the Republican primary and watched him lose as a Democrat. Former Alabama Democratic Congressman Parker Griffith did the exact opposite. He jumped into the Republican primary and lost down there. Tea Partiers ousted Senator Bob Bennett at the Republican state convention out in Utah. They ran Governor Charlie Crist right out of the Republican Senate primary in Florida. And the latest victim of the Tea Party is South Carolina congressman Bob Inglis who lost a Republican runoff just last month after getting hammered in town halls for voting for TARP and knocking down false rumors about death panels. He joins us right now. Congressman Inglis, I want to make sure everybody knows you’re not a RINO. You’ve got an 85 percent conservative record, you’ve got a five percent liberal record. You’re a conservative, right? REP. BOB INGLIS: Right, I think it’s actually 93 percent ACU rating. Yeah, yeah. MATTHEWS: Well I looked, I looked at it a couple years ago. So you’re up to date at ninety, ninety-what? INGLIS: Ninety-three percent. MATTHEWS: So you’re not conservative enough for South Carolina. INGLIS: I needed that extra seven. MATTHEWS: Oh my God! Well you told the Associated Press, quote, “I think we have a lot of leaders that are following those television and talk radio personalities and not leading us.” We’ve had a little contest here, as you know, waiting for somebody. Well, you’re a lame duck now but maybe you count. But we’ve been waiting for somebody to say “I’m not really a ditto head. I don’t really follow Rush Limbaugh’s thinking. He’s not my leader.” Are you ready to be the first? INGLIS: Well I’ll tell ya- MATTHEWS: Or are you still gonna hold back? INGLIS: I don’t, I don’t follow Rush Limbaugh’s lead. You know, when, when I found out I didn’t? I was in six years and I was out of Congress for six years and I was listening to him one day and he’s making fun of people in cars who get high fuel efficiency and I thought, you know, Rush, that’s it. I turned the radio off. MATTHEWS: Yeah. INGLIS: Because it didn’t fit with my dad who’s 87 years old. He’s my idea of conservative. He used to tell us, “Now, we gonna let off the gas at the Tarvers’ and you coast to our driveway,” because he’s a conservative. MATTHEWS: Well what happened to Teddy Roosevelt? Wasn’t he a great conservative in the Republican Party? INGLIS: Yeah, absolutely. MATTHEWS: A conservationist. INGLIS: Yeah and so my, yeah and so my thought was, you know, listen, conservatism is saving resources, and, and what Rush was further making fun of is people driving electric cars with regenerative braking. I’m thinking, if I make the investment to get up the hill with my gas, why wouldn’t I want to generate electricity coming down the hill? I’m a conservative. MATTHEWS: Rush, by the way, says a lot of things. He makes fun of anybody who tries to deal with conservation issues, which are traditionally conservative issues. He makes fun of all kinds of things. … MATTHEWS: You, you sir, strike me, as I hate to use the word, as someone who’s well-educated. I know you went to UVA Law School. Is that hurting you? Is – no I’m dead serious about this. Do you get hurt in the Republican Party now for having had a fine education? Do people think, look askance at you and say, “Oh he’s an egghead, he’s got a good degree from UVA” Is that a problem now, it’s better to be a yahoo? Well I mean to be really uneducated like Palin, to really be proud of the fact you don’t know anything? INGLIS: There, there is a sense out there that ignorance is strength. But you know ignorance really is not strength. MATTHEWS: Where did that come from? Where did that come from? INGLIS: And here’s my view. I’m ignorant of a lot of things. There are a lot of things I need to know but if I choose to remain ignorant of those things, that’s when, that’s quite a different matter. So I have a sense of how much I don’t know and I need to find out a lot of information. I think that’s what education gives you is a sense of how much you don’t know and let’s go find it out. MATTHEWS: Well, what do you make of Palin’s – without getting — she seems like, I guess a nice person as a human being but the question is, is she selling herself as someone – she calls it common sense. But I think what she’s really selling is “I don’t read books. I don’t read newspapers, Katie Couric. I don’t read magazines. I don’t need information. I have common conservative sense.” What does that mean? To say you know things without having read it or learned anything? What do people know naturally? … MATTHEWS: Well, that fear that led people like Rick Perry of Texas to talk about secession, those old scare terms about race. I mean race is always an issue in America but to go back and rip that scab off? What’s that about? Why are people doing that? Is it their fear, fear of change or is it just anger or what? INGLIS: Yeah well, I think that we, what we’re finding out here that in 2010 we have not fought the final fight against the scent of racism and won. We’re still in it. We’re still dealing with that problem. We always will be, but we need to extend grace to one another and have some honesty about it, understand that we are different, but let’s find a way to extend grace and get through it, and that’s – rather than womp up those fears and drive with misinformation reactions against people because of their party or their ethnicity. That’s a real problem and it- MATTHEWS: How do you figure your state out? It’s pretty conservative obviously. It’s Strom Thurmond country in many ways and, and it has people like DeMint pretty far over and then people like Lindsey Graham who are sort of regular conservatives. But then you nominated, your party has nominated an Indian-American woman, Nikki Haley. Obviously an attractive candidate, she knows how to present herself obviously, but what’s that about? Is that just an interesting little aspect? It’s okay to be Indian-American but we’ve got a problem with this black president? What’s that about?

Read the original here:
Confused Matthews: How Can South Carolina GOPers Vote for a Indian-American But Not Support a Black President?

Muse Bassist Compares Being On ‘Twilight’ Soundtracks To Selling Soul

Chris Wolstenholme is ambivalent about soundtracks that have boosted his band’s profile in the U.S. By Gil Kaufman Muse’s Chris Wolstenholme Photo: Stuart Wilson/ Getty Images After making millions of potential new fans thanks to the inclusion of their songs on all three “Twilight” soundtrack albums, Muse bassist Chris Wolstenholme may be risking the bloodthirsty wrath of the Twi-Hard Nation with some comments he recently made about the vampire sensation. “I’m not sure how cool it is to be on those kind of things, but sometimes you’ve just got to get your music out there in different ways,” the told BBC Radio 1’s Newsbeat column. Even with the films’ box-office success and the massive exposure for the band, which is stadium-rocking huge in Europe but has not yet broken through in the same way in the U.S., Wolstenholme said he’s not sure the trade-off has been worth it. “It’s very difficult in America, because you don’t have anything like Radio 1, nothing is national,” he said. “You have to take every opportunity you get over there, and sometimes you have to sell your soul.” The group’s “Supermassive Black Hole” was the lead track on the original “Twilight” soundtrack — and it played a pivotal role in the key baseball scene in the film — while “I Belong to You (New Moon Remix)” appeared on the “New Moon” disc, and “Neutron Star Collision (Love Is Forever)” is on the “Eclipse” album. “Twilight” author Stephenie Meyer is an avowed fan of the drama-loving band and has said that their music inspired her writing, but Wolstenholme appeared ambivalent about how the music has been used in the films. He said he watched the original movie and “quite enjoyed it,” even if it wasn’t his “cup of tea,” but he has not seen the two sequels. When it came time to place “Neutron Star Collision” in “Eclipse,” there appears to have been some confusion over where it would fit in that added to his uneasiness about participating in the project. “When we were in the studio writing it, one minute they said they wanted to use it in the end credits, then they said they wanted to use it in another scene,” he said. “Then it was another scene, and in the end, we were like, ‘Do what you want with it, we don’t care any more.’ ” The comments were a bit of a turnabout from ones drummer Dominic Howard made in October, when he said the band was flattered to be the only group to appear on the first two “Twilight” soundtracks. “It might be something to do with Stephenie Meyer and that she loves us,” Howard told MTV News. “We met her quite awhile ago in Phoenix — it was before ‘Twilight’ came out. She’s a very nice lady and talked about how she listens to our music as she writes her books. This is all way before it turned into this huge success that it is, before everyone went vampire nuts.” At the time, Howard said that inclusion in the “Twilight” franchise had helped Muse reach out to “whole loads of new people that haven’t heard us before. … It’s a nice side project to be involved in.” After pushing back, rearranging and canceling a pair of North American dates due to the impending birth of Wolstenholme’s fifth child, Muse are slated to be back on the road in the U.S. for a September 22 show in San Diego. And the bassist said things are finally breaking through for them stateside. “It’s going great over there,” he said. “Early this year, we started playing in arenas, so it was great to finally take over the full production that we toured with in Europe. … For a long time, America fell by the wayside and nothing was really happening at all, and we were having problems with our record company over there.” But with a full slate of dates through the end of the year, don’t expect a follow-up to last year’s Resistance any time soon. “The touring schedules are so crazy that just the thought of another album is just not even there at the moment,” he said. “I’m sure [singer] Matt [Bellamy] has plenty of ideas, but physically trying to get together and work on stuff is just not possible on tour. … The few days off we do have, we like to go home or go somewhere and chill out. We prefer to keep the two things separate and not try and think too much about recording when we’re touring.” What do you think of Chris’ comments about “Twilight”? Sound off in the comments. Check out everything we’ve got on “The Twilight Saga: Eclipse” and “Breaking Dawn.” For young Hollywood news, fashion and “Twilight” updates around the clock, visit HollywoodCrush.MTV.com . Related Artists Muse

The rest is here:
Muse Bassist Compares Being On ‘Twilight’ Soundtracks To Selling Soul