Tag Archives: religion

NYT’s Charles Blow: Obama Is Not Good For Jews

“Is President Obama good for the Jews?” asked New York Times columnist Charles Blow Saturday. His answer was quite surprising: “For more and more Jewish-Americans, the answer is no.”  In his piece marvelously titled “Oy Vey, Obama,” Blow referred to Thursday’s Pew Research Center report finding “33% of Jewish voters identify with or lean toward the Republican Party, up from 20% in 2008.” From there, Blow went where a liberal columnist for the New York Times typically dares not: This is no doubt a reaction, at least in part, to the Obama administration having taken a hard rhetorical stance with Israel, while taking “special time and care on our relationship with the Muslim world,” as Robert Gibbs, the White House press secretary, put it in June. If that sounds like courtship, it is. Some of the president’s most ardent critics and some of Israel’s staunchest American defenders – two groups that are by no means mutually exclusive – have seized on what they see as the administration’s unfair and unbalanced treatment of Israel and have taken their denunciations to the extremes. After addressing some recent events – the Administration’s denunciation of Israeli settlements last September, the White House urging Israel to sign the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty in April, and May’s Gaza flotilla incident – Blow shared with his readers some more data on this issue: Fair or not, these criticisms are crystallizing into a shared belief among many: Obama is burning bridges with the Jewish community in order to build bridges to the Muslim world. There is very little independent polling, aside from Pew’s party identification polling, to help us understand how American Jews see the president, his stance toward Israel and the political implications. So in that vacuum, pollsters with partisan leanings have been spinning their findings like dreidels. In April, the Republican polling firm McLaughlin & Associates released a survey that they said showed that only 42 percent of American Jews would vote to re-elect President Obama. He captured 78 percent of the Jewish vote in 2008. Recently, the democratic pollster Stanley Greenberg and the Israel Project, a nonprofit in Washington, conducted a poll that they said found American support of Israel was dropping like a rock. Wherever the truth lies, it is fair to say that it doesn’t bode well for Obama. Indeed it doesn’t, although it’s quite shocking to read such a conclusion in a column by one of the Times’ most liberal contributors.

Go here to read the rest:
NYT’s Charles Blow: Obama Is Not Good For Jews

CNN Continues to Promote ‘Islamophobia’ Accusation From Time

CNN’s T. J. Holmes brought back Time’s Bobby Ghosh on Friday’s Newsroom for more promotion of his “Islamophobia” cover story , and added two Muslim guests who largely agreed with his thesis that anti-Islamic sentiment was “coming into the mainstream,” and how this was apparently a “reason for alarm.” Holmes asked softball questions, and no one with an opposing viewpoint appeared during the segment. The anchor had the three on for a panel discussion at the bottom of the 10 am Eastern hour about Ghosh’s “Is America Islamophobic?” article, as well the controversy over the planned mosque near Ground Zero in New York City. Before introducing his guests, Holmes held up two examples of apparent “Islamophobia” in the country and seemed to sympathize with the apparent plight of Muslims in the U.S.: HOLMES: Two-and-a-half million Muslims live, work and pray in America- not always easy. Case in point: protests in California – check that out- marching against a proposed mosque in their area, holding signs with slogans such as, ‘Muslims danced for joy on 9/11’ – or how about the planned Islamic center and mosque near New York’s Ground Zero? More than 60 percent of Americans are opposed to that center being built. But the scope is bigger than that, according to a Time magazine poll. More than 3 in 10 Americans would say no to a mosque in their neighborhood. Then there are statements like this one from evangelical leader Franklin Graham. REV. FRANKLIN GRAHAM (from August 18, 2010 CNN’s “John King USA”): To hate the Jew, to hate the Christian, to kill them- their goal is world domination. And for the Muslim, peace means when all of the other nations are subject to Islam- then we are at peace. The world will be at peace when the entire world is under Islam. Well, I don’t agree with the teachings of Islam – The CNN anchor then introduced Ghosh, as well as Mayor Mohammed Hameeduddi of Teaneck, New Jersey, “a New York suburb just 20 miles from Ground Zero,” and Reza Aslan of The Daily Beast. Holmes first let the Time deputy international editor explain his “Islamophobia” accusation: ” There are far too many people…like Franklin Graham- who have made it their business to project Islam in the most negative possible light …. there is a lot of Islamophobia about in this country, and it’s growing and becoming more vicious , and, with this latest mosque controversies- not one, but several controversies around the country- it’s coming into the mainstream, and that is reason for alarm .” Moments later, Aslan, who once denied that there was “no such thing as sharia” law , endorsed and expanded upon Ghosh’s point: ASLAN: Look, t here have always been pockets in this country that have had a real problem with Islam, that have seen Islam as violent, as bigoted, and that have brushed all Muslims with the exact same brush as they use to describe al Qaeda . The difference now is how mainstream it’s become. I mean, when the leading GOP candidate for president, Newt Gingrich, openly and repeatedly compares al Qaeda to American Muslims , repeating- just referring to both of them as simply ‘they,’ as in ‘they attacked us and now they wanted build a mosque,’ you’re starting to realize how just- sort of, part of the regular political discussion overtly anti-Islamic sentiment has become. That’s what is different now. It’s always been there, but its now part of the mainstream dialogue. Gingrich is the “leading GOP candidate for president”? That’s news to a lot of people, conservatives and liberals alike. According to CNN’s own poll on August 13 , Mitt Romney had the most support, followed by Sarah Palin. Gingrich was in third. Mayor Hameeduddi, a Democrat, actually partially blamed the media for the apparent “Islamophobia:” HAMEEDUDDI: I hate to use – you know, make the media the scapegoat on this, but we consistently see things- Muslims portrayed in very negative lights on TV , and you don’t necessarily see- like, if you look at Times Square in December, where they did an ad campaign about- you know, ‘I’m Muslim, I’m an American.’ It was doctors, lawyers, fireman, policemen, people of all sorts- people of all- of American society being put on the billboard. And I think that the discussion- we need to raise the content in the form of our discourse. Are there problems and are there protests? Yes. But in my town- you know, when we went before the zoning board to get the expansion for our mosque- our masjid, it was done in one night and it was a 9-0 unanimous vote. Towards the end of the segment, Holmes deferred to his guests by asking what could be labeled as leading/softball questions that helped advance their viewpoint. Aslan actually laid much of the blame for the spread of “Islamophobia” at the feet of- you guessed it- Fox News (maybe he’ll appear on Rick Sanchez’s show soon): HOLMES: …The dialogue- the discourse has not necessarily been civil in a lot of ways. Are we missing an opportunity here now with this controversy going on in New York about this proposed Islamic center and mosque- are we missing an opportunity to have a discussion, to educate people a little bit more about Muslims? GHOSH: I worry that we are missing the opportunity. I think the window is still open. It hasn’t closed yet, but there is so much anger and there is so much noise- there’s screaming that is taking place from one side of this discussion- that I worry that there will be no calm, composed, rational debate. Now, to the mayor’s point, I’m delighted that in Teaneck, when they expanded the mosque, this was done without any real rancor. H owever, in California, in Tehmecula- California, a blue state- people who are protesting the mosque, turned up to Friday prayers with dogs- now, knowing full well that that would be considered deeply offensive to the people . We have gone to a point where people opposing each other are now looking specifically for ways to offend the other, and that suggests to me that a calm, rational discussion at this very moment seems impossible. HOLMES: Well, you all help me wrap this up . Reza, and to you- and we can do this quickly. Reza, who can help in this conversation? You heard the mayor mention kind of the media doesn’t help sometimes, but who can help? Who can step out there and lead the conversation- somebody that people will listen to, a Muslim leader, whether that’s a great communicator, whether that’s a politician- who can step out there and help bridge this divide that clearly is there, according- certainly, of the polls and some of these pictures we see at some of these protests? ASLAN: Well, it’s supposed to be our political and religious leaders, but they’re doing the opposite. They’re either running away from this or openly espousing religious bigotry as a political platform. And then, of course, we have an entire cable news broadcast- Fox News, I have to say- that is essentially turning this into a way of economic gain . So, I really don’t have a lot of faith that the people who we should rely on to bring everybody down and make sure that the values of American pluralism are ascendant- that they’ll actually do that. HOLMES: And quickly if you can, same question, Mr. Mayor- and also, I know you were in the room last Friday when the President made his statement that kind of sparked the controversy over the weekend about the mosque- the proposed mosque and Islamic center in New York. Has the President helped in the statement he made? Can he be the one? Who can help us in this conversation? HAMEEDUDDI: Well- I mean, the statement that he made was one of a constitutional argument, which- you know, I swore to uphold the Constitution, and I think the President did also. So that’s where he was coming from. But, as a Muslim, when we talk about- you know, the Islamophobia, we have the power within ourselves to either be bitter or be better. And if we’re bitter, we don’t help our society around us. But if we become better, we can uplift the society, and that’s where our challenge faces us in the next years to come. And, as Reza was saying- yeah, it is up to politicians like me. On September 4th, I’m having a conversation at a synagogue- you know, ‘from Rosh Hashana to Ramadan.’ And these are the things that need to happen on a local level- on an interfaith level- that you’ll see these things blossom all over the country. I think that- right now, it’s a very trying time, and I think that this issue with the mosque doesn’t help anything in New York, but it is an opportunity to build on- understanding of what Muslim Americans really believe in America. HOLMES: Well, that is the point right there, Mr. Mayor. We appreciate you being here. Reza, we appreciate you as well. And again, Bobby Ghosh- again, the article is coming out- going to be hitting newsstands I believe soon- I don’t think it’s out yet- but Bobby Ghosh- coming out Monday, I’m just told now. But Bobby, a lot of people need to check out- GHOSH: Should be on newsstands over the weekend. HOLMES: Over the weekend! All right. Make sure we get that in and know exactly when it’s going to be. But Bobby, I thank you as well. Wow, it seems that political correctness has seeped into controversies surrounding Islam to the point that bringing your dog to a protest against a mosque is some kind of act of bigotry.

Here is the original post:
CNN Continues to Promote ‘Islamophobia’ Accusation From Time

WaPo Publishes Puffy 25-Paragraph Story: ‘When It Comes to Praying, Obama Prefers Privacy’

” When it comes to praying, Obama prefers privacy. ” Thus reads the page A2 headline for Michael Shear’s August 20 Washington Post story that reads like an extended Obama White House campaign press release. Shear opens with a story about how Obama prayed with “three Christian pastors” over the phone as he flew to Chicago to celebrate his 49th birthday. “As he celebrated his birthday, he was in a reflective mood,” Shear cooed. “He told them he wanted to pray about the year that had passed, what’s really important in life and the challenges ahead,” the Post staffer added before cuing up Joel Hunter, “an evangelical pastor who ws on the call and who is part of a small circle of spiritual advisers who frequently talk to Obama by phone.” Hunter served up the argument of Shear’s article, that because Obama is private about his Christian faith, it’s no wonder polls show a growing number of people unsure of his faith, with some even thinking he’s a Muslim. “You know what happens with a vacuum?” Hunter asked, before answering his own question, “It gets filled.” Aside from Hunter and Obama himself, Shear quoted only Obama staffers: deputy press secretary Bill Burton and Joshua DuBois, Obama’s “chief faith adviser in the White House.” Shear failed to raise any Christian leaders who, for instance, might question how a Christian like Obama could be as staunchly opposed as he is to any restriction on abortion rights. Shear also noted that Obama “talked about his belief in Jesus’s resurrection” at an Easter breakfast earlier this year, going on to quote the relevant passage in the next paragraph. Yet Shear failed to recognize that Obama’s mishmash of spiritual beliefs aren’t exactly in line with the exclusivist claims of historic, orthodox Christianity. Indeed, one can detect a bit of Clintonian word-wrangling in an 2004 interview with Cathleen Falsani of the Chicago Sun-Times , particularly when Obama tackles the meaning of Jesus’ statement that he alone is “the way, the truth, and the life” (emphasis mine): “I am a Christian,” the 42-year-old Illinois state senator and Democratic candidate for the U.S. Senate says, as one of the nearby customers interrupts to congratulate him on his recent primary win. Obama shakes the man’s hand and says, “Thank you very much. I appreciate that,” before turning his attention directly back to the question. “So, I have a deep faith,” Obama continues. “I’m rooted in the Christian tradition. I believe that there are many paths to the same place , and that is a belief that there is a higher power, a belief that we are connected as a people. “That there are values that transcend race or culture, that move us forward, and there’s an obligation for all of us individually as well as collectively to take responsibility to make those values lived.” It’s perhaps an unlikely theological position for someone who places his faith squarely at the feet of Jesus to take, saying essentially that all people of faith — Christians, Jews, Muslims, animists, everyone — know the same God. That depends, Obama says, on how a particular verse from the Gospel of John, where Jesus says, ” I am the way, the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father but by me,” is heard.

More here:
WaPo Publishes Puffy 25-Paragraph Story: ‘When It Comes to Praying, Obama Prefers Privacy’

NBC’s Todd Frets Obama’s Effort to ‘Tackle’ Nation’s Problems Allowed Enemies to Defame Him as Muslim

NBC Nightly News anchor Brian Williams cited a “stunning number” from “a reputable pollster” (Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life and the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press) – which discovered “just under 20 percent of the American people believe the President is a Muslim” when “he is not” – to justify a full explanation from Chuck Todd on the mischaracterization of Barack Obama. “Look, let’s be clear,” NBC’s chief White House correspondent declared, “President Barack Obama was born in the United States and he is a Christian.” Without pointing out how confusion and ignorance about Obama’s religious affiliation extends beyond just Republicans and conservatives (41 percent of Democrats and 31 percent of liberals “don’t know” Obama’s religion), Todd fretted: “Ever since Mr. Obama became a national political figure, some of his political enemies have fanned the flames of religious prejudice by trying to make people believe the President is a Muslim.” Todd despaired that Obama’s focus on his job had left him vulnerable to abuse: During the campaign, Team Obama repeatedly refuted these charges with a special Web site they created called FightTheSmears. Well, when he took office, the anti-Obama campaign continued, but the White House tackled a slew of other issues, and efforts to refute those other attacks took a backseat. Completing his delivery of White House talking points, Todd asserted: “Ironically, Brian, during the campaign, some of the President’s political enemies attacked him for the way he practiced Christianity in Chicago where his minister – the Reverend Jeremiah Wright – was a controversial figure.” Over on FNC, however, Major Garrett noted that “while Mr. Obama’s political opponents are more likely to believe he’s a Muslim, uncertainty has seeped in the President’s political base.” In his piece for Special Report with Bret Baier, Garrett featured a soundbite from Alan Cooperman, the Associate Director of the Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life, who also appeared in Todd’s story. In the clip run on FNC, Cooperman observed: Less than half of Democrats say the President is a Christian [46%]. Less than half of African-Americans say the President is a Christian [43%]. Less than half of people who give Obama positive job approval ratings say he’s a Christian. Indeed, Pew’s report, “Growing Number of Americans Say Obama is a Muslim” ( Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life version; Pew Research Center for the People & the Press version) found: A new national survey by the Pew Research Center finds that nearly one-in-five Americans (18%) now say Obama is a Muslim, up from 11% in March 2009. Only about one-third of adults (34%) say Obama is a Christian, down sharply from 48% in 2009. Fully 43% say they do not know what Obama’s religion is…. Among Democrats, for instance, 46% say Obama is a Christian, down from 55% in March 2009. The belief that Obama is a Muslim has increased most sharply among Republicans (up 14 points since 2009), especially conservative Republicans (up 16 points). But the number of independents who say Obama is a Muslim has also increased significantly (up eight points). There has been little change in the number of Democrats who say Obama is a Muslim, but fewer Democrats today say he is a Christian (down nine points since 2009)…. But even among Democrats, fewer than half (46%) now identify his religion as Christian, down from 55% last year. On Thursday night, ABC’s World News skipped the poll numbers, but the CBS Evening News squeezed in a short item from Harry Smith in a newscast devoted almost entirely to Katie Couric in Afghanistan: The White House said today President Obama is a Christian and prays every day. A spokesman felt is necessary to make that clear after a poll came out showing a significant number of Americans believe the President is Muslim. 18 percent think so. That’s up from 11 percent last year. From the Thursday, August 19 NBC Nightly News: BRIAN WILLIAMS: A new opinion poll from a reputable pollster in this country just out today is getting a lot of attention tonight because it contains a stunning number. Just under 20 percent of the American people believe the President is a Muslim – he is not – on top of a growing number of people who believe he’s foreign-born – and he is not. We go behind these numbers tonight with our chief White House correspondent Chuck Todd who’s in our Washington newsroom. Chuck, good evening. CHUCK TODD: Good evening, Brian. Look, let’s be clear. President Barack Obama was born in the United States and he is a Christian. But ever since Mr. Obama became a national political figure, some of his political enemies have fanned the flames of religious prejudice by trying to make people believe the President is a Muslim. In fact, with some of these same political enemies who helped ignite another phony claim that the President wasn’t born in the United States. Well, during the campaign, Team Obama repeatedly refuted these charges with a special Web site they created called FightTheSmears. Well, when he took office, the anti-Obama campaign continued, but the White House tackled a slew of other issues, and efforts to refute those other attacks took a backseat. In March 2009, according to Pew Research, about half the country – 48 percent – correctly identified the President as a Christian, 11 percent believed he was a Muslim, and about a third – 34 percent – had no idea of his faith. Now these results are even more striking. Only 34 percent correctly told Pew pollsters that Mr. Obama is a Christian, while a whopping 18 percent – or nearly one in five Americans – say he is a Muslim, and 43 percent have no idea of his faith at all. Well, earlier today, I asked Alan Cooperman at Pew Research to explain why, in the face of clear evidence that the President is not a Muslim, that a growing number of Americans believe he is. ALAN COOPERMAN, PEW FORUM ON RELIGION AND PUBLIC LIFE: In the absence of information from the White House and from the President himself about his faith, about his faith life, about him going to church, messages from others – innuendo and rumor included – are able to maybe gain currency. TODD: Ironically, Brian, during the campaign, some of the President’s political enemies attacked him for the way he practiced Christianity in Chicago where his minister – the Reverend Jeremiah Wright – was a controversial figure. Now, today the White House said the President is a, quote,  “committed Christian,” and prays every day. But aides said they were not surprised by the poll findings because, as one put it, quote, “The President doesn’t wear his religion on his sleeve,” Brian.

Follow this link:
NBC’s Todd Frets Obama’s Effort to ‘Tackle’ Nation’s Problems Allowed Enemies to Defame Him as Muslim

CNN and Time Promote Accusation That ‘Bigotry’ is Driving Mosque Debate

CNN’s American Morning and Newsroom programs on Thursday brought on Time magazine’s Bobby Ghosh to highlight his “Is America Islamophobic?” article and help promote his accusation that ” hate speech ” and ” bigotry ” have ” come out into the mainstream ” during the course of the debate over the proposed New York City mosque near Ground Zero. During his American Morning appearance, anchor Kiran Chetry hailed Ghosh’s article, which is the cover story of the upcoming August 30th issue of Time, as ” a very thoughtful piece .” Anchor Ali Velshi, who conducted the second interview of the Time deputy international editor, went further than his colleague: ” Okay, you’re American- Time magazine is required reading ….Bobby Ghosh… wrote the Islamophobia piece that I think everybody is going to have to read because if you are in this country, it’s part of the dialogue that we are involved in at this point .” But only days earlier, in an August 3 Time.com article about the imam behind the mosque, Ghosh stated that the “last legal hurdle to the proposed Islamic center near the site of the World Trade Center has been removed, but ignorance, bigotry and politics are more formidable obstacles …. Criticism [of the mosque] spans the gamut, from the ill-informed anguish of those who mistakenly view Islam as the malevolent force that brought down the towers to the ill-considered opportunism of right-wing politicians who see Islam as an easy target .” So the “thoughtful” Time editor whose latest is “required reading” even had the gall to criticize the families and the friends of those who died on 9/11, or who are generally emotionally-touched by the carnage of the attack. Ghosh didn’t speak so sharply during his two CNN appearance on Thursday, but he still went after what he labeled as “hate speech” in the controversy over the planned mosque. During the American Morning segment 15 minutes into the 8 am Eastern hour, Chetry first asked the editor, “Do you believe that this debate…typifies how people feel on larger scale about Muslims in America?” Ghosh seemed to walk back what he said on August 3: GHOSH: Well, let me clarify. You don’t have to be an Islamophobe to have reservations about this particular project. You don’t have to be prejudiced to have very genuine concerns about it . But what we have seen in the process of this debate and about mosques- not just here in New York, but all over this country- is that there has been a vicious- some very vicious hate speech has entered the mainstream of discussion in this country, and that is- certainly, we are seeing some Islamophobic views being expressed by people who we wouldn’t have expected it from – when you have legitimate political figures comparing the religion of Islam to Naziism. That is something on a scale that we have never seen before. The Time deputy editor pushed this point throughout this first interview: GHOSH: There are lots of people who feel- not unreasonably, they feel emotionally attached to that particular space. There are people who are concerned genuinely for the feelings of the families of the victims at the World Trade Center. There are people who have- as I said, perfectly legitimate reasons to have concerns. But what this debate has done is that has brought out- from previously, what was in the fringes into the mainstream, along with reasonable people- a lot of hate speech and a lot of very vicious hate speech that we haven’t heard before . CHETRY: And not just the mosque debate- the controversy over this one- but we’ve seen a bit of a change, many say, over the past few years. Any of it linked to the fact that we’ve seen more instances of either attempted or homegrown terror that we thought- I mean after 9/11, a lot of people said this is a problem the United States doesn’t have- what Europe has, problem with radicalization within our borders- and we have the Times Square bomber and a few other thwarted attempts or plots- has that added to this fear and feeling that Islam in America, perhaps, is radical in some way? GHOSH: Absolutely. There is certainly alarm that has grown in concern and suspicion. But there are also people who are taking advantage of this for political reasons- who are taking advantage of this concern- who are take advantage of the fact that a lot of Americans don’t know very much about Islam. It is a very small religion in this country, compared with some other places in the world. So many Americans- and we have a poll that shows this- we don’t really know that much about it. So- and now you have people, who for political reasons, are taking advantage of the combination of fear and lack of knowledge, and adding to this- this toxic language, and are spreading- sometimes, knowing full well- spreading lies and misrepresentations about the faith, and are tarring an entire community- an entire religion with the brush- that they are all from- that they’re all potentially terrorists . That your neighbor, who is an American citizen, and- by all polling, who’s proud to be an American citizen- happens to be a Muslim- may potentially be someone who’s plotting against us. Five and a half hours later, at the bottom of the 1 pm Eastern hour of CNN’s Newsroom, Ghosh repeated his main points, and even added an accusation of “racism” against the opponents of the mosque and other Islamic projects in the country: GHOSH: There’s a lot of Islamophobia growing in this country . It’s not as bad as some parts of Europe. There are no neo-Nazi thugs going around beating up American Muslims. But there is a lot of hate speech, and it’s getting louder and more vicious . And in these mosque protests, not just the one here in the New York, but all over the country- in these mosque protests, we’ve seen that hate speech take on a new and more venomous tinge to it. And here’s the worst part: it’s now come out into the mainstream and we’re listening to figures- not fringe lunatics, if you pardon the expression- but we’re listening to people who are held in wide respect in this country, say things that, in other contexts, would be considered completely inappropriate . VELSHI: Have you been able to come up with contexts to give examples of where it would be appropriate- inappropriate? Where we wouldn’t use this kind of language to talk about another identifiable group? GHOSH: I don’t think any identifiable group but the Muslims in this country. I don’t think Newt Gingrich could say that- could compare them with Nazis. I think that would be considered- he- it would never occur to him. But as somebody who I spoke to during the story told me, Islamophobia is now the accepted form of racism in this country. Muslims feel that people are allowed in the public sphere to say whatever they want to say about Islam, and they can get away with it. The editor then gave an example of what he saw was “hate speech” against Islam and/or Muslims: GHOSH: Things did get quite a lot worse after 9/11. We weren’t paying that much attention because there was a war coming. There was enormous human tragedy in the city. And so, we didn’t pay that much attention when someone like Pat Robertson or Jerry Falwell compared the prophet Muhammed to a terrorist, and somebody else said he was a pervert. But if you were a Muslim-American, you were paying attention . Then things did quiet down, and to a substantial degree, the credit goes to President Bush, who made it clear right from the get-go, from the 12th of September- VELSHI: Our war is not with Muslims- GHOSH: It’s not with Muslims. It’s a religion of peace. It’s just a small band of extremists that we are fighting. But then more terrorist acts took place- more recently, there have been acts committed by Muslim-Americans. America went to war in two Muslim countries. You started hearing about suicide bombings on television every day. So, a certain fear and sense of alarm crept in, which is all right- which is permissible. But then you have people who have made it their business to capitalize on that sense of alarm for political gains- who have stoked up this thing and sort of deliberately spread very poisonous lies about the religion and about the people who practice that religion, and put it out there into the public theater . So Robertson and Falwell’s historically-accurate assertion that Mohammed was a 7th century-version of a terrorist, particularly in his treatment towards the Jews of the Arabian peninsula , is “hate speech” in Ghosh’s book. Furthermore, it is completely legitimate to point out that Muhammad was a pervert according to many culture’s standards, as his wife Aisha was betrothed to him when she was six or seven years old, and their marriage was consummated when she was nine or ten, according to the very hadith writings held up by Islam . One might guess it’s “hate speech” to point that out as well. Velshi, who worried on Wednesday’s Newsroom that if a government helped moved the site of the planned mosque, other governments  would ” entertain petitions of moving Catholic churches away from the Oklahoma bombing site ,” since Timothy McVeigh was baptized Catholic, actually helped forward some of the editor’s talking points later in the interview: GHOSH: Four in ten Americans have a negative view of Islam, and that’s a very dangerous proportion . And so, some of the challenge for the Muslim community is to communicate better, is to give a better sense of what Islam really is, is to persuade people that they’re not all to be tarred with one brush. And ironically, that is what the people behind Park 51, the cultural center here in New York- that’s what they’re trying to do. They’re trying to communicate that Islam is not what many Americans perceive . That it is a- VELSHI: Right-right. But every part of their message has been lost? GHOSH: At the moment, yes. VELSHI: The name Cordoba- some people are associating it with Muslim rule and bloody battles, when, in fact, Cordoba was one of the finest times in relations between the major religions . GHOSH: Exactly right- in interfaith discourse- VELSHI: Yeah- GHOSH: And the great mosque of Cordoba that people are talking about and that Newt Gingrich was talking about- the man who built it, the Muslim prince who built it, bought it from a Christian group- paid money for it and bought it from a Christian group. And there was not a lot of alarm and anger raised then. It’s- as I said, we- I’m afraid, at this point, no rational discussion seems possible- VELSHI: Right- it’s just too hot. GHOSH: It will take us a little while, and temperatures have to cool down. Maybe we have to wait for this election to get over (unintelligible)- VELSHI: What’s difficult- and I was going to say- what’s difficult is that it’s been difficult for people who would like to have a reasonable discussion about this to do so, because they are then lumped with being politically correct or things like- in fact, it’s hard. We’ve heard politicians who have come out in defense of letting this mosque be built sound like they are apologists or some sort. Now, everybody now is backing away from the positions that defend free speech. GHOSH: No less a person than the president of the United States, which, for many Muslims, is quite disappointing. It will take an act of statesmanship. Statesmanship is when you can rise above the public sentiment and bring people along with you. If we went with the majority, there would still be segregation in this country. If we went with the majority- VELSHI: Women wouldn’t vote in this country . GHOSH: Exactly- American Jews would still be- still not have all their rights. So, it’s time for leadership. It’s time for our politicians- and if it doesn’t come from politics, it may have to come from somewhere else- it’s time for Americans to step up and say, this will not be allowed in this country. This country was built on finer principles than this, and we are going- we’re not going to tolerate this kind of prejudice, this kind of bigotry, and this kind of Islamophobia.

More here:
CNN and Time Promote Accusation That ‘Bigotry’ is Driving Mosque Debate

CBS, NBC Skip Pelosi Threat to Investigate Opposition to Ground Zero Mosque

Only Good Morning America’s Jake Tapper on Thursday mentioned the call by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to investigate those who oppose the construction of a mosque near Ground Zero. CBS’s Early Show and NBC’s Today both skipped any discussion of the subject. So did Wednesday night’s network newscasts. Tapper explained, “And the House top Democrat also called for transparency for who is funding the opposition to the Islamic center.” He then featured a clip of Pelosi advocating, “And I have joined those who have called for looking into how is this opposition to the mosque being funded.” However, Tapper also described GOP opposition to the Ground Zero mosque this way: ” Some of the opposition is being ginned up by the group founded by Republicans William Kristol and Liz Cheney, which has started running this web video, featuring family members of 9/11 victims.” “Ginned up” is not a term often used for liberal organizations A transcript of the August 19 segment, which aired at 7:04am EDT, follows: ASHLEIGH BANFIELD: Some developments in the controversy over the Islamic center and mosque near Ground Zero. Two New York leaders, Governor David Paterson, and the leader of the Catholic Church in the city, have suggested that the center be moved to another site. The issue is following the President, too, as he begins his vacation today on Martha’s Vineyard, where we catch up with Jake Tapper this morning. Jake? JAKE TAPPER: Good morning, Ashleigh. Well, that’s right, President Obama arrives here later today, hoping to get a break from the depressing economic news, the grueling reports from the front lines in Afghanistan and, of course, that contentious debate of that proposed Islamic center two blocks from Ground Zero. The President went to Ohio to campaign for Democrats and to talk about jobs. BARACK OBAMA: We are moving in the right direction. TAPPER: But, inevitably, he was asked whether he had any regrets about joining the controversy over the proposed Islamic center near Ground Zero, so overwhelmingly opposed by the public. OBAMA: The answer is no regrets. TAPPER: House Speaker Nancy Pelosi echoed the President’s support for freedom of religion. She also called for transparency for who will pay for the project, which some estimates price at $100 million. And the House top Democrat also called for transparency for who is funding the opposition to the Islamic center. NANCY PELOSI: And I have joined those who have called for looking into how is this opposition to the mosque being funded. TAPPER: Some of the opposition is being ginned up by the group founded by Republicans William Kristol and Liz Cheney , which has started running this web video, featuring family members of 9/11 victims. UNIDENTIFIED MAN: This mosque, it’s wrong. It’s so wrong. TAPPER: Not every Republican agrees. Ted Olson, the Solicitor General for President George W. Bush, whose wife was killed on 9/11, said President Obama is right. TED OLSON: We don’t want to turn an act of hate against us, by extremists, into an act of intolerance for people of religious faith. TAPPER: And, Ashleigh, on the heels of this debate, a new Pew poll indicates that a growing number of Americans believe, wrongly, that president Obama is a Muslim. It’s 18 percent believe he’s a Muslim. That’s up from 11 percent last year. They were wrong last year. And the 18 percent are wrong this year. Ashleigh? BANFIELD: Wow. So much for vacation, huh? All right, Jake. Thanks very much.

Originally posted here:
CBS, NBC Skip Pelosi Threat to Investigate Opposition to Ground Zero Mosque

AP Orders Staff: ‘Stop Using the Phrase “Ground Zero Mosque”’

In an unusual move, the Associated Press has publicly released an advisory memo to its reporters on how to cover of the Ground Zero mosque story – and the first rule is that journalists must immediately stop calling it the “Ground Zero mosque” story. “We should continue to avoid the phrase ‘Ground zero mosque’ or ‘mosque at ground zero’ on all platforms,” reads the advisory, which was issued by the AP’s Standards Center. Instead of the “Ground Zero mosque,” AP recommends that reporters use the terms “mosque 2 blocks from WTC site,” “Muslim (or Islamic) center near WTC site,” “mosque near ground zero,” or “mosque near WTC site.” The AP suggests that it might “useful in some stories to note that Muslim prayer services have been held since 2009 in the building that the new project will replace.” In addition, the news service offers a “succinct summary of President Obama’s position” on the mosque, but doesn’t include the positions of any other politicians. Also included in the advisory is a “Fact Check” to provide “additional background” for reporters. “A New York imam and his proposed mosque near ground zero are being demonized by political candidates – mostly Republicans – despite the fact that Islam is already very much a part of the World Trade Center neighborhood,” reads the first paragraph of the Fact Check. “And that Muslims pray inside the Pentagon, too, less than 80 feet from where terrorists attacked. And that the imam who’s being branded an extremist has been valued by both Republican and Democratic administrations as a moderate face of the faith.” One of the “facts” that the AP feels the need to “clarify” is that Ground Zero mosque organizer Feisal Abdul Rauf is a moderate Muslim. “Rauf counts former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright from the Clinton administration as a friend and appeared at events overseas or meetings in Washington with former President George W. Bush’s secretary of state, Condoleezza Rice, and Bush adviser Karen Hughes,” says the article, though it does also mention briefly Rauf’s comments about America being an “accessory” to the Sept. 11 attacks. The advisory also “fact checks” pure opinion statements made by conservatives, like former House Speaker Newt Gringrich’s assertion that “America is experiencing an Islamist cultural-political offensive designed to undermine and destroy our civilization.” “Such opinions are shared by some Americans, while others are more reluctant to paint the religion with a broad brush and more welcoming of the faith in this country,” reads the Fact Check. “Bush, himself, while criticized at the time for stirring suspicions about American Muslims, traveled to a Washington mosque less than a week after the attacks to declare that terrorism is ‘not what Islam is all about. Islam is peace.'” AP is arguable the most influential news organization in the country, and many media outlets adhere to its guidelines in their reporting.

See the original post:
AP Orders Staff: ‘Stop Using the Phrase “Ground Zero Mosque”’

USA Today Blogger Annoyed by Ground Zero Mosque/Auschwitz Convent Analogies

“Ground Zero is not Auschwitz, so why all the analogies?” USA Today religion blogger Cathy Lynn Grossman asks that question with the headline of her August 18 Faith & Reason post . Grossman explained that the comparison stems from conservatives who pointed out an incident in the early 1990s when Pope John Paul II halted a planned convent near the Auschwitz concentration camp. The nuns had every right to build the convent, but it was unwise and insensitive to do so, leading the pontiff to scrap the plan. By way of analogy, Muslims have every right to build a mosque near Ground Zero, but the insensitivity of doing so blocks from the site of the deadliest radical Islamic terror attack in U.S. history should lead Muslim leaders to call for the project to be scrapped. But Grossman then went on to quote two liberals who reject the Auschwitz analogy as invalid before she conflated the Ground Zero mosque issue with isolated incidents across the country where other folks are raising NIMBY objections to mosques in their hometowns (emphasis Grossman’s): Meanwhile, none of the analogies flying about address whether people who are enraged at Islam care about individual Muslms or mosque zoning — from Manhattan, to Murfreesboro, Tenn., to Temecula, Calif., where a Baptist pastor objects to a mosque planned for near his church. And New York Gov. David Paterson will soon meet with Cordoba Initiative planners behind the lower Manhattan community center to discuss the location. Does this sound familiar? Are we still on the post from earlier this week? Is anywhere far enough away to suit critics? How do you apply the First Amendment here?

More here:
USA Today Blogger Annoyed by Ground Zero Mosque/Auschwitz Convent Analogies

When Muslims Make Fun of the Amish

So last night on the show, Andy Levy pointed out that the person representing the Ground Zero mosque on Twitter made a few jabs at the Amish. This is what the Tweeter tweeted: Amish saying stop Muslims?1. What are you doing on the computer? 2. That’s not very Amish 3. Shouldn’t you be making butter? Later, that tweet was deleted. Which is a shame, because it didn’t have to go. See, the Mosque folks don’t understand that here in America you can make fun of any religion – yes, even the Amish – and angry followers won’t throw acid in your face or behead you in front of a tripod. And, as primitive as the Amish are, they won’t even stone you to death for adultery. But the tweeting Park51 can be forgiven: maybe they thought the Amish might head out from Lancaster County and fly a buggy straight into their building. Don’t worry, “Parky:” they wouldn’t get the horses through the Lincoln Tunnel. Anyhoo, that’s my point. We all make Amish jokes, because we can. They are nice people. The worst thing they ever did was deal meth – and in parts of rural PA, that’s almost considered a civic duty (I kid the rural PA-ers). Meanwhile, after I made my proposal to open a gay Muslim bar next to the mosque – I was warned by friends, coworkers and deli managers that I’d end up dead. Who knew so many people hated the Pet Shop Boys? But it is certainly rich for the folks behind the mosque to poke fun of a religion for eschewing modern convenience. After all, the Amish are beyond advanced when compared to the most ardent followers of Islam. Remember, the Amish do not demand that the world to return to a period when its prophet lived – a time when more people died during childbirth than from old age. But hey – at least these Mosque-eteers at Park51 can make fun of the Amish. Maybe later, they can make fun of themselves. And if you disagree with me, you’re a racist homophobe who stole my pants. Crossposted at Big Hollywood  

Continue reading here:
When Muslims Make Fun of the Amish

Colmes Blogger: America ‘Riddled with Religion,’ Churches’ ‘Free Ride’ Should End

What’s the best way to address rising debt and deficits? According to one liberal blogger, it’s not cutting spending, but taxing churches, that will solve America’s financial woes. “[Americans] should have the right to support any institution they feel supports their views,” William K. Wolfrum wrote on Alan Colmes’s  Liberaland blog  Aug. 17. “But that does not mean the State should reimburse people or churches for their beliefs.” He argued that because churches take “political stands” – opposing gay marriage or abortion, for example – they should not enjoy tax-exempt status. But, to be fair, Wolfrum appears to show no favoritism. “The most important aspect of removing tax-exempt status from churches or religious entities is that it must be all-encompassing,” he wrote. “Whether you believe a certain religion is ‘true’ or ‘false’ makes no difference. Scientology should be taxes, as should Islam. The Catholic church should be taxes, as should synagogues. There are no favorites. Whether you believe in L. Ron Hubbard, Jesus, a tree, Mother Earth or Allah, it is time for the tax man to cometh.” Wolfrum brushed aside the idea that churches provide charity services for the needy, saying such work is done “for a singular purpose – to encourage people to follow their beliefs. The more that follow those beliefs, the more money is taken in by the church or religious entity.” He complained that the “Tax God” movement would never succeed “in a nation so riddled with religion.” Even so, Wolfrum concluded, “If America is serious about reigning in its ballooning debt, taxing churches needs to be put on the table. God has gotten a free ride long enough in the United States, and it’s hurting the one true religion in America – Capitalism.”