Tag Archives: rooney mara

Psycho Titles + Blockbuster Spies = First Bourne Legacy Trailer

There are no new ideas in Hollywood, hence a Bourne franchise reboot whose first trailer — just released via Apple — borrows somewhat heavily from the opening titles of Psycho . (At least they’re both Universal films, right? Score one for synergy!) But that’s immaterial here after a certain point, probably around the time when Stacy Keach is all WHO IS HE? or when a house blows up or simply when Jeremy Renner’s Aaron Cross is revealed in all his rifle-toting, tree-hopping glory. Who can resist? Anyway, the whole gang’s here: Joan Allen, David Strathairn and Albert Finney from the original series; Keach, Rachel Weisz and Edward Norton from the new generation… everyone but Matt Damon, I guess. Oh, and who’s missing the nauseating promise of more shaky-cam stylings from director Paul Greengrass, replaced here by Bourne screenwriting vet Tony Gilroy? Good, me neither. VERDICT : Sold! [via Apple ] Follow S.T. VanAirsdale on Twitter . Follow Movieline on Twitter .

Read more here:
Psycho Titles + Blockbuster Spies = First Bourne Legacy Trailer

VFX Trailblazer Douglas Trumbull Describes His Radical 3-D Experiment to Save Movies

Between the rise of digital media and the shortcuts many theaters have taken to alleviate waning profits – forgoing film rigs for digital projectors , replacing projectionists with button-pushers, lowering projection-bulb levels to cut replacement costs – many filmmakers are concerned about the state of their industry. Visual effects veteran and filmmaker Douglas Trumbull ( 2001: A Space Odyssey, Close Encounters, The Tree of Life ), for one, is doing something about it: He hopes to bring back the spectacle of the theater-going experience – and revitalize the industry in the process — with a project he’s shooting at 120 frames per second, in 3-D, to be projected at seven times the luminosity often seen in theaters today. Trumbull rocked the visual effects community with his big ideas for change while accepting the Georges Méliès Award at the annual Visual Effects Society Awards last night in Beverly Hills. Named after the cinema pioneer whose groundbreaking work in motion-picture art was celebrated in Martin Scorsese’s Oscar-nominated Hugo (which, incidentally, took home top honors for Supporting Visual Effects), the Méliès Award “honors a special individual who has pioneered a significant and lasting contribution to the art and science of the visual effects industry.” Trumbull, who collaborated with Steven Spielberg on Close Encounters of the Third Kind , Ridley Scott on Blade Runner , and most recently contributed mesmerizing effects to Terrence Malick’s The Tree of Life , pointed to his work on Stanley Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey as the kind of moviegoing experience he hopes to recreate with his 120 FPS, 3-D project. The key, however, and the element that makes many a filmmaker cringe when their product is released into the world, is the substandard light level at which many theaters project 3-D films, which Trumbull argues diminishes the power of a movie and the often amazing visual effects work that created it. While the industry standard recommended luminosity for a projected film is 16 foot-lamberts for 2-D projection, many theaters wind up projecting 3-D at much dimmer levels , as low as four foot-lamberts, and Trumbull suggests this has led to diminishing appeal for moviegoers. Trumbull has nearly twice the ideal standard — 30 foot-lamberts — in mind for his new project. Add in the 120 fps frame rate Trumbull is working with and that’s one helluva recipe for mind-blowing visual presentation; standard films use a frame rate of 24 frames per second, but a few filmmakers have recently begun exploring filming at a higher than standard rate for increased picture clarity and smoothness, especially with 3-D. Peter Jackson is currently filming The Hobbit at 48 fps ; James Cameron was considering either 48 fps or 60 fps for his Avatar sequels, explaining the choice thusly: “The 3D shows you a window into reality; the higher frame rate takes the glass out of the window. In fact, it is just reality.” So just imagine Trumbull’s movie projected in 3-D, brighter and more detailed at 30 foot-lamberts and 120 frames per second. If Cameron and Jackson think 48 fps and 60 fps will bring us this much closer to a perception of true reality at the movie theater, what will the Trumbull experience do to the way we see movies? From Trumbull’s VES Awards speech: “I am horrified when I go to a movie theater and I see any of our movies projected on four foot-lamberts or less. This is bad. The mission that I’ve been on ever since I’ve had the really great pleasure and responsibility to work with Stanley Kubrick on 2001 was that that movie was shot and projected in Cinerama, on giant 90-foot-wide screens — which are unheard of today except in a few IMAX theaters — and it was an experience that went beyond normal cinematic conventions. It took you on an adventure to outer space, and it was a first-person experience, not necessarily a third-person experience. It didn’t have much in the way of drama, conflict, suspense, or action in the normal sense, but Kubrick wanted to get out of the way and let you go on this trip in outer space, and was enabled by this amazing giant screen movie process… and a lot of special effects. So I’m looking forward to a time that I think is achievable in the very near future with this mission that I’m personally on right now. I feel that I have to direct a film the way I want to see a film be made and to be seen. I’m experimenting right now, amazingly, at 120 frames a second in 3-D on giant screens, 30 foot-lamberts after polarization. And I have to tell you that the illusion is like a window unto reality. So it’s not just like going to a movie, it’s like going to a live Broadway show. It’s like Cirque du Soleil, a spectacle. It has potential to unleash the power of all of the work that you all do, to deliver to the audience incredible… if you’re going to spend $100, $150, $250 million on a movie that’s being throttled through a very narrow bandwidth of a 4:2:2 digital cinema package to go to a theater to get projected in four foot-lamberts, I think it’s unacceptable. So my job is to try to fix that for you. I don’t find anybody else working on it, strangely enough; Michael Bay talks about his frustrations with the brightness of his movies, as do other movie directors. I’m hoping I can make some progress and I’m hoping I can make a movie that actually demonstrates how this all works.” Meanwhile, Trumbull also has designs on improving the industry for the artists themselves — not the celebrity actors who already earn big bucks and hog the spotlight, or even the directors themselves, but the below-the-line talent, the technical artists who create movie magic by building the worlds that actors play in. “We are the most important players in the whole movie industry.,” Trumbull told the hundreds of Visual Effects Society members in attendance. “You guys do all the heavy lifting.” The biggest problem for technical artists, he said, is that they’re not compensated well enough for their contributions, especially since their CG work and effects arguably make possible the tentpoles and billion-dollar franchises that keep the studio system afloat. “We don’t get to participate in the profits, and this is a very big problem,” he declared. “I was very lucky in the early days when I was working with Steven Spielberg on Close Encounters ; I was able at that moment in history to negotiate a piece of the net profits on Close Encounters . I’m looking forward to a time in the hopeful near future where you will all receive residual checks for the work you do.” And Trumbull is willing to put his money where his mouth is; uniting both of his big ideas, he promised profit share for any VFX artists who come work on his movie. “If we want to bring people back into theaters and show them all the work that you did,” he said, “we’ve got to make the screens bigger, we’ve got to make theaters more spectacular, we’ve got to have showmanship in theaters like they did in the old days. We’ve got to bring people back in theaters because what you can get out of a movie theater is so different, so better, and so spectacular that you couldn’t possibly get it on your iPad.” Impressed as the VES Awards crowd seemed with Trumbull’s potential game-changer and his rousing cry for artist recognition, at least one effects professional I spoke with seemed skeptical of his plan. It’d be too risky and, he thought, too costly, to jump in with the visionary, profit-sharing or no. That said, Trumbull said he’s determined to see his 120 fps/3-D experiment come to life to show the world his vision for film’s potential. “Even if I can only show it in one movie theater, I will be happy to do that.” Follow Jen Yamato on Twitter . Follow Movieline on Twitter .

Continued here:
VFX Trailblazer Douglas Trumbull Describes His Radical 3-D Experiment to Save Movies

Natalie Portman Signs Up for Terrence Malick Two-Fer

After spending the last year with her Oscar and her new baby, Natalie Portman is set to return to acting with a busy year with not one, but two Terrence Malick films. The Black Swan star will join Christian Bale and Cate Blanchett to film Knight of Cups this summer, with all three reuniting in the fall to film Malick’s Lawless with Ryan Gosling , Rooney Mara , and Haley Bennett. Plot details for both films have been kept under wraps, so tee off with your thoughts on the Portman addition and the unusual double film casting move below. [ Deadline ]

Continue reading here:
Natalie Portman Signs Up for Terrence Malick Two-Fer

Jennifer Lawrence, Rooney Mara, Others Cover Vanity Far Hollywood Issue

Some of the most beautiful and bad ass young female talents in Hollywood assembled to star in Vanity Fair’s annual Hollywood issue, and they look great. Academy Award nominee Rooney Mara, The Hunger Games star Jennifer Lawrence, Jessica Chastain and Mia Wasikowska share the cover of the publication. Check out their glam, old-school Hollywood look: Famed photographer Mario Testino is responsible for the images, in which The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo star Mara still wears a hint of goth-ish lipstick. Rooney could even pass for a stoic Lady Gaga at a glance! Who else was featured as Vanity Fair ‘s top talent of ’12? Elizabeth Olsen, Adepero Oduye, Shailene Woodley, Paula Patton, Felicity Jones, Lily Collins and Brit Marling all made the list of 11 lucky ladies recognized. Here’s the complete roster of VF ‘s Hollywood issue …

Go here to read the rest:
Jennifer Lawrence, Rooney Mara, Others Cover Vanity Far Hollywood Issue

No Rooney Pooney for Indian, Japanese Dragon Tattoo Fans

We’ve got no love lost for the MPAA here at Skin Central, but at least they let us see some furburger (or a merkin, as the case may be) every once in a while. Let’s not beat around the bush (heh): the Japanese have a pube problem. The country has long been saddled with a self-imposed ban on pubic hair , and bush is usually blurred out in both mainstream films and porno. Yes, even porno. No, we don’t know how they survive. So it’s no surprise that Rooney Mara’s full-frontal scenes in The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo (2011) ruffled the Japanese censors (the fact that Rooney was actually wearing a merkin didn’t help). In the end, they allowed the film to debut in Japan with its provocative skin scenes intact but with, as The Hollywood Reporter puts it, ” some mosaic-blurring of the kind that graces even pornographic films in Japan. ” Still, that’s better than the plight of Indian move-goers, who won’t be able to see The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo at all in their home country. The Indian Central Board of Film Certification rejected the film outright after director David Fincher refused to cut three nude scenes that are central to the plot, canceling its scheduled February 10 debut in India. See what all the fuss is about with The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo right here at MrSkin.com!

Read this article:
No Rooney Pooney for Indian, Japanese Dragon Tattoo Fans

Oscar Index: The Beginning of the End

There’s good news and bad news to begin this post-nomination , next-to-next-to-next-to-next-to-last installment of Oscar Index. The good news? It’s kind of almost over! The bad news? Oy. Please don’t make me repeat it. The laurel-sniffing wonks at Movieline’s Institute for the Advanced Study of Kudos Forensics went 27 for 34 predicting its regular, top six categories, which means that the Academy basically tossed in a “surprise” every fifth nomination or so — though specialists at the MIASKF technically refuse to classify anything that was on last week’s charts as a “surprise.” So basically, if it’s not all two nominations for The Daldry , then you probably should have seen it coming. Which you did. As such, we resume the Sisyphean torment of our Oscar-addled eternities, pushing boulders that look and feel suspiciously like crystal balls up hills that look and feel vaguely like the bones of 84 years’ worth of snubs. What does it all mean? To the Index! The Final 9: 1. The Artist 2. The Descendants 3. The Help 4. Midnight in Paris 5. Hugo 6. Moneyball 7. War Horse 8. The Daldry 9. The Tree of Life My favorite parts of nomination morning — apart from the Lucasfilm plant who yelped, ” Red Tails ! Gotta be Red Tails ” as Al Roker informally polled Today Show tourists about their Best Picture predictions — were the peals of ecstasy that greeted The Daldry ‘s announcement among the year’s nine Picture nominees. It sounded like a dog clamping down on a chew toy made of publicists. Other nominations elicited vaguely similar reactions, but that was The Reaction, as if to underscore just how desperately all the parties of all the films involved had chased this singular recognition, and how favorably the Academy regards its most dogged pursers. That’s nothing new, of course. But for a film that has both critics and audiences on record as utterly disinterested (at best) to find 5 percent of the voting body — around 270 people or so — necessary to call it the Best Picture of 2011 ? That’s just fundamentally fucked up. It literally doesn’t make sense . It’s one thing to look back and deduce how a film like, say, Crash actually wins Best Picture (e.g. through vote splitting among other nominees). It’s another thing to look at this year’s nine nominees — loaded with the range of critical and commercial (to say nothing of self-referential ) successes we’ve been accustomed to forecasting as the Academy’s favorites for generations now — and comprehend the basic qualifications of this group to recommend anything more than what this producer or that studio commanded them to acknowledge. Again: So what, right? C’est la Oscar ! Indeed, anyone who’s been doing this a while is accustomed to being vexed, perplexed, bemused, confused, shocked, rocked and baffled. But I’m not only not used to battling the undertow of cynicism so early in the season, I’m also not used to the Academy so obviously stirring such malevolence in audiences. Forget about the press: We’re just as insular and aloof and susceptible to influence as the Academy is. I’m thinking of ordinary viewers now — people who, for better or worse, look to the Academy as tastemakers and who now have a squealing clique of flacks to thank for steering them and their money toward shameless, reconstituted Oscar bait like The Daldry . The ordinary viewer doesn’t know that this film wasn’t made for him or her, but rather for 5 percent of an audience of 6,000 “industry professionals” sought to anoint it as “Oscar-nominated.” The ordinary viewer may never learn more about such provocative, sincere brilliance as Melancholia or Take Shelter , or the disgracefully buried Margaret , or the delicate jewel that is Bill Cunningham New York (which the Documentary Branch, in all its lobotomized glory, naturally snubbed), all because they couldn’t compete with The Daldry ‘s more moneyed, seasonal “greatness.” The ordinary viewer doesn’t notice the handiwork of Scott Rudin’s cabal of mercenary Oscar ninjas, star-flinging sharpshooters laboring on The Daldry ‘s behalf. But God willing, the ordinary viewer heard that sound in the back of the Samuel Goldwyn Theater on Tuesday morning and recognized its quivering evil as the alarm it was. Apart from that? Congrats, to the Tree of Life team, I guess? And don’t count out The Descendants , or something . Whatever: Everyone’s going to kissing Harvey Weinstein’s ring again when they lose to the recent PGA Award-winner The Artist , so… yeah. At least we have the Super Bowl to look forward to. The Final 5: 1. Michel Hazanavicius, The Artist 2. Martin Scorsese, Hugo 3. Alexander Payne, The Descendants 4. Woody Allen, Midnight in Paris 5. Terrence Malick, The Tree of Life Scorsese leapfrogged Payne thanks to 11 nominations for Hugo — and he may not be done there, depending on how warmly sad Academy lifers receive a front-runner whose name their president, Tom Sherak, couldn’t be bothered to pronounce correctly Tuesday morning. Though Sherak screwed up “Score-say-zee”‘s name, too, so who knows? “Malick” rolls off the tongue, no? Let’s surprise him and find out. The Final 5: 1. (tie) Meryl Streep, The Iron Lady 1. (tie) Viola Davis, The Help 3. Michelle Williams, My Week With Marilyn 4. Rooney Mara, The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo 5. Glenn Close, Albert Nobbs Poor Tilda Swinton, another casualty of the Academy’s 2012 shocking kamikaze quest for mediocrity. Glenn Close evidently tends to bring that out in the actors’ branch. Who knew? We’ll always have Rooney, I suppose. Anyway, when I or anyone else have a little clearer read on who’s where in the top two, the Index will reflect it. But right now it’s basically a bunch of Oscar pundits shrugging and staggering out of happy hours in New York and L.A., hiccuping deep revelations like, “Awwww, man, they don’t make Best Actresses like Halle Berry anymore, those were the days,” and “I wonder if chairs at the Kodak Theater talk to each other… What would they [PUUUUKKEEEE]…”, etc. etc. The Leading 5: 1. [tie] Jean Dujardin, The Artist 2. [tie] George Clooney, The Descendants 3. Brad Pitt, Moneyball 4. Gary Oldman, Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy 5. Demi

Tale of the NFL Playoff Tape: Green Bay Packers vs. New York Giants

THG is making the NFL playoffs as simple as can be. By breaking down the most important aspects of this weekend’s second round playoff games, we already know: The New Orleans Saints will beat the San Francisco 49ers . The New England Patriots will destroy the Denver Broncos . The Baltimore Ravens will prevail over the Houston Texans . Now, let’s finish off the quartet by forecasting the Green Bay Packers vs. the New York Giants… POINTS SCORED IN FIRST MEETING THIS YEAR : Packers: 38 Giants: 35 Edge: Packers NOTABLE AREA FOOD EXPORTS : Packers: Cheddar, sausages Giants: Bagels, Manhattan clam chowder Edge: Packers EMBARRASSING ACTION BY EX-STAR : Packers: Brett Favre texted photos of his penis to an employee Giants: Plaxico Burress shot himself in the thigh Edge: Even OWNED BY : Packers: City of Green Bay Giants: Rooney Mara’s family Edge: Packers CELEBRITY FANS : Packers: Denis Leary, Erin Andrews, David Ortiz (wife is from Wisconsin), Lil Wayne, Jessica Szohr Giants: Jon Bon Jovi, Adam Sandler, Angie Harmon, Busta Rhymes, Mara sisters Edge: Even THE VERDICT : Sorry, Giants fans. While a common upset choice, New York simply doesn’t have what it takes to hang with Green Bay, failing to win a single category and only pulling out a couple ties due to Bon Jovi and a wide receiver who spent time in jail. The Packers take this one, 3-0-2. WHO DO YOU THINK WILL WIN?

More:
Tale of the NFL Playoff Tape: Green Bay Packers vs. New York Giants

Can We Please Stop Calling Girl With the Dragon Tattoo a Box-Office Disappointment?

” Weak .” ” Lackluster .” ” Underwhelming .” ” Less-than-stellar .” Such are the general characterizations of The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo ‘s box-office earnings to date from observers, insiders and pundits around the Web. And now for an equally appropriate one-word response to those perceptions: ” Huh? ” I’m not exactly sure what kind of money that experts thought David Fincher’s 160-minute, hard-R-rated, unswervingly bleak adaptation of the bestselling novel was supposed to have made by now, but let’s look at the facts for a second: Through Tuesday, Dragon Tattoo has earned a little more than $79 million domestically . (In all likelihood it passed $80 million on Wednesday, but again — facts!) That would be $79 million in three weeks of release, the best showing ever for an R-rated December drama in that time frame. Or call it a thriller if you want; that still makes it second only to — wait for it — Scream 2 . Again, that’s domestically . Worldwide, it’s already made more than its 2009 Swedish predecessor : $108.3 million (and counting) to $104.3 million. Which of course we’d all expect, but from the panicked sound of things you probably wouldn’t guess it still has yet to open in 16 foreign markets — including France, Germany, Australia and Japan. ” Well ,” one particularly specious argument might follow, “the Swedish version only cost $13 million compared to the Hollywood version’s $90 million.” True. And…? Would studio boss Amy Pascal, producer Scott Rudin, and the whole Dragon Tattoo team love for it to run away with hearts and minds and half a billion dollars? Of course! On the other hand, do you think the notoriously risk-averse Sony leadership would have budgeted this at $90 million or pulled the trigger on two sequels if it wasn’t absolutely positive the film was disappointment-proof? Or that they ever sat Rudin and Fincher down for Culver City come-to-Jesus meeting: “You know, guys, Niels Arden Oplev adapted the same book a couple years ago for $13 million… Can you trim a few things?” Give me a break. Which reminds me: Who exactly is in this film again? Daniel Craig’s never successfully opened anything beyond the Bond franchise. Rooney Mara is best known for five minutes of screen time in The Social Network (though to be fair, she has been a leading lady in a number-one film ). The movie is the brand, and the brand is the book. Just because it’s the official literature of airline passengers, beach layabouts and subway straphangers far and wide doesn’t mean they’re all going to turn out for it at Christmas — not when they can see Tom Cruise hopping around the horizon in Dubai. Oh, yes — about that Dec. 21 release date. “It was too cocky of us,” one anonymous Sony exec told our sister site Deadline. “We might think about that next time.” Yeah, right . Sony and Co. had an awards-friendly strategy from the start, and it worked: Just come out of the holiday frame ahead of War Horse (talk about a movie with no stars and no brand), win some guild notices and maybe a Golden Globe, and then nail down seven Oscar nominations including Picture, Director, Actress, Adapted Screenplay, Cinematography, Score and Art Direction. By this point they’ve crossed $100 million domestic, and just like that they’re the hottest Best Picture-nominated wide release still in theaters. (At least until The Descendants , which is an inarguable commercial success , goes wide.) “We might think about that next time.” Ha! You do that, Sony. And if you don’t believe that scenario, then ask yourself this: Why are we facing such a consistent barrage of doom-and-gloom Dragon Tattoo stories in a period when the struggles of fellow Best Picture candidates Hugo , War Horse and even The Artist all go relatively unreported? Especially this week, with Oscar-nomination ballots due tomorrow afternoon? Let me put it this way: If no one envied and/or feared Dragon Tattoo , then we wouldn’t even be having this conversation. Elsewhere in the aforementioned Deadline report , a Sony exec is also quoted as saying the $300 million projected globally for their rapey, miserablist Scandinavian potboiler with one marketable star and a hard R-rating and a likely Oscar profile and two sequels on the way would still be “a really good number.” Really? You think so, pal? I mean, if the takeaway is that you thought you had the next Hangover on your hands, then trust me: You have have much bigger problems than the movie. Anyway. The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo is doing fine. Better than fine! It’s great! Glad to get that cleared up. Follow S.T. VanAirsdale on Twitter . Follow Movieline on Twitter .

More here:
Can We Please Stop Calling Girl With the Dragon Tattoo a Box-Office Disappointment?

Move Over, Oscar: The YouReviewer Movie Awards Are Rolling Out This February

Sure, the awards-season buzz at the moment is focused on both this weekend’s Golden Globes and the Oscar nominations coming up on Jan 24. But who says a few average guys with an unabashed love of all things cinema aren’t fully qualified to honor the best of the big screen from the comfort of the (very) small screen? Enter the YouReviewers Movie Awards, which will be bringing its second annual show to Movieline parent company PMC’s brand-spanking-new YouTube original channel ENTV . It’s the only show that reflects the choices of YouTube nation – yes, all 800 million monthly unique monthly visitors strong. “The YouReviewers committee is made up of a wide range of people — women, men, all ages, generations,” says YouReviewers co-founders and co-hosts The Schmoes. “YouReviewers is relatable and the audience feels that their voice is being heard.” “The average person has a voice that matters,” says Jeremy Jahns, YouTube critic extraordinaire and co-host and founder of the awards. “The YouReviewer Movie Awards show celebrates that in a big way.” Also handing out awards on the YouReviewers are such YouTube star-cinephiles as “Beyond the Trailer’s” Grace Randolph, Catherine Reitman and Chris Stuckman. The YouReviewers Movie Awards will be announced mid-February and will air on ENTV (you can subscribe — and earn a chance at a free iPad 2 — here !), but for now, here are a list of the nominees, as voted on by the YouReviewer community. [Scroll to the end of the list for an introduction from co-founders The Schmoes and Jeremy Jahns.] BEST PICTURE Drive 50/50 The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo Rise Of The Planet Of The Apes The Artist Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Pt. 2 Hugo The Descendants Midnight in Paris Warrior BEST DIRECTOR Nicolas Winding Refn ( Drive ) David Fincher ( The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo ) Martin Scorsese ( Hugo ) Steven Spielberg ( War Horse ) Michel Hazanavicius ( The Artist ) BEST ACTOR George Clooney ( The Descendants ) Ryan Gosling ( Drive ) Joseph Gordon Levitt ( 50/50 ) Michael Fassbender ( Shame ) Brad Pitt ( Moneyball ) BEST ACTRESS Rooney Mara ( The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo ) Viola Davis ( The Help ) Emma Stone ( The Help ) Charlize Theron ( Young Adult ) Michelle Williams ( My Week with Marilyn ) BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR Nick Nolte ( Warrior ) Christopher Plummer ( Beginners ) Albert Brooks ( Drive ) Jonah Hill ( Moneyball ) Andy Serkis ( Rise Of The Planet Of The Apes ) BEST SUPPORTING ACTRESS Octavia Spencer ( The Help ) Shailene Woodley ( The Descendants ) Elle Fanning ( Super 8 ) Melissa McCarthy ( Bridesmaids ) Carey Mulligan ( Shame ) BREAKTHROUGH ACTOR Joel Courtney Michael Fassbender Ryan Gosling Jean Dujardin John Boyega BREAKTHROUGH ACTRESS Rooney Mara Shailene Woodley Berenice Bejo Jessica Chastain Brit Marling BEST VILLAIN Albert Brooks ( Drive ) Voldemort ( Harry Potter ) Kevin Bacon ( X-Men: First Class ) Loki ( Thor ) Bryce Dallas Howard ( The Help ) BEST HERO Rooney Mara ( The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo ) Gosling ( Drive ) Harry Potter Moses ( Attack the Block ) Caesar ( Rise Of The Planet Of The Apes ) BEST TRAILER The Dark Knight Rises Trailer 2 The Hobbit The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo The Avengers Prometheus MOST UNDERRATED FILM Warrior The Adjustment Bureau Win Win Hanna Attack the Block THE I’M SHOCKED IT DIDN’T SUCK AWARD Real Steel Fast Five Rise Of The Planet Of The Apes MI:4: Ghost Protocol

View post:
Move Over, Oscar: The YouReviewer Movie Awards Are Rolling Out This February

What a Dragon Tattoo Really Costs

Anyone who tells you that receiving a tattoo like the dragon design occupying a quarter of Rooney Mara’s back in The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo will not hurt is a liar. Nevertheless, he’s a competitively priced liar, according to a new survey of tattoo artists asked the simple question: “How much would it cost to buy a dragon tattoo?” Mike Ryan shopped around this week on the streets of New York, finding estimates ranging from $500 to $1,200 and three different replies to the other critical question in the process: “Will it hurt?” Ha! Of course it will hurt : I spoke to artist Daniel Cotte, whose estimate came in quite a bit higher than those of his competitors. “You see,” Cotte said as he pointed at the picture of Rooney Mara’s back, “there’s a tail on the dragon that snakes around and out of view.” That detail, he explained, makes the dragon tattoo much more expensive — and much more painful. He put the price of the dragon tattoo somewhere between $800 and $1,200, and he definitely recommended coming in for two separate sessions — adding up to four hours in all. Now you know. Find slightly more optimistic estimates at the link below. NOTE: “I AM A RAPIST PIG” tattoos remain free of charge.