Tag Archives: salary

Kim Richards Loves Life, Wants to Remain on The Real Housewives of Beverly Hills

Will she stay will she go? The whole world wants to know the status of Kim Richards on The Real Housewives of Beverly Hills . Bravo is yet to make an announcement, but this reality star made it clear to Us Weekly last night: she wants to stick around. “I love life. I’ve just been enjoying it so much,” Kim told the magazine at a pre-Oscar party in Los Angeles, referring to her recent trip to rehab and adding: “[My experience] doesn’t make me want to walk away from anything,It makes me want to step out in front of everything and just say, ‘You know what, anybody can do it.’ I don’t want to walk away from anything in my life. It’s part of life: facing it!” We’re guessing the salary and exposure don’t hurt, either. Richards also made a point of thanking those around her for helping her overcome so many personal struggles. “My family and friends – without them I just couldn’t do it. My fans have been so supportive… People walk up to me and they just hug me and cry. That’s so rewarding to me.”

Visit link:
Kim Richards Loves Life, Wants to Remain on The Real Housewives of Beverly Hills

Guess How Much Chris Pine Allegedly Made for This Means War?

How’s this for a dramatic break-up story? After a nine-year relationship with SDB Partners, Chris Pine opted to part ways via email. Having worked with the actor for pretty much his entire career to date, during which time he rose from guest slots on ER and CSI: Miami to nabbing Star Trek and this week’s slick rom-com This Means War , Pine’s former agents weren’t going to be dumped so easily; they’re suing Pine for millions in back- and future-commissions with a lawsuit that puts his salaries on blast. All of which means that today we get to play “Guess That Salary – Chris Pine Edition!” As you ponder the fiscal worth of Pine’s charm, chops, and star power, consider the trajectory his career has taken since his film debut in 2004’s The Princess Diaries 2: Royal Engagement . I recall feeling compassion for Pine when, in 2006, he found himself stuck opposite Lindsay Lohan in Just My Luck and playing a sightless virgin in Blind Dating ; can’t say his agents were doing a great service for him with those unfortunate turns. But then came Smokin Aces , with Pine near-unrecognizable as the eldest Tremor brother, and within a few years Pine landed the career-making role of Captain James T. Kirk in J.J. Abrams’ Star Trek . Still, Star Trek fame wasn’t enough to help Pine open the long-delayed horror pic Carriers in the fall of 2009, but soon enough he found himself sharing the screen with Denzel Washington (and a runaway train) in Unstoppable , which boosted his profile. Now he’s billed along with fellow up and comer Tom Hardy and Reese Witherspoon in the love triangle spy romance This Means War , a slick $70M Valentine’s week offering from McG which in the very least showcases Pine’s pretty blue eyes, comic timing, and leading man swagger. And according to the SDB lawsuit (obtained by The Hollywood Reporter ), these last few years of rising stardom have brought Pine to quite an enviable place: For This Means War he was reportedly paid $5 million. ( Unstoppable nabbed him a $3 million paycheck, while he’s set to earn a base salary of $4 million, $8 million, and $12 million for the planned Jack Ryan series.) What say you, Movieliners? Is Pine’s star rising in accordance with his salary? Chris Pine Sued By Former Agents; ‘This Means War,’ ‘Star Trek 2’ Salary Revealed [THR]

View post:
Guess How Much Chris Pine Allegedly Made for This Means War?

Mo Money: Lockout Puts Plenty Paper In Owners Hands But Leaves Players With Less Than Before!!!

The NBA lockout is a wrap, so what exactly was all the fuss over again? The Wall Street Journal did a breakdown of who stands to gain the most from the agreement and they’re saying the owners are definitely #winning: The biggest changes will be off the court after owners scored an obvious economic win. The two sides will split the league’s $4 billion in annual revenue almost equally, while in previous agreements the players received 57%. On the court, despite systematic changes like reducing contract length and increasing fees for high-spending teams, most think it will be business as usual. “It’s not exactly the same as it’s always been, but it’s closest to that than something new—this is not a seismic shift,” said Tom Penn, a former Portland Trailblazers executive and a salary-cap expert. “The system still favors aggressive owners who are in go-for-it mode. It will just cost them more.” The league also scored a victory on the business side. The 10-year deal, with an option to terminate after six years by either side, saves not only this season but also the NBA’s image as a viable option for advertising. “The big winners are anyone involved in marketing and financing in the NBA—the advertisers, the sponsors, they’ve got continuity now,” said David Carter, executive director of the Sports Business Institute at the University of Southern California’s Marshall School of Business. “A lot of people are focusing on what this means right away, but you have to look at it as 10 years that marketing partners and TV partners know they have this.” The NBA salvages its national TV contract with Walt Disney Co.’s ESPN and ABC and Time Warner Inc.’s Turner Sports, which pay the league a combined $930 million per year. Advertisers spent $807 million on NBA games that aired on cable and network TV last season, according to WPP PLC’s Kantar Media. An average of two million people watched regular-season NBA games last year on ESPN, while an average of 2.5 million watched such games on Turner’s TNT, according to Nielsen. NBA Deputy Commissioner Adam Silver said that competitive advantage was “critical” in the negotiations and that the goal of the new deal was for all 30 teams to compete. But USC’s Mr. Carter said although that will be a valuable ticket-selling message for small-market teams, it will still be a “rarity” for small teams to compete at the level of more high-profile teams under the new deal. Mr. Penn, who is now an analyst at ESPN, said small-market teams will still face the same obstacles in the new system, adding that for struggling teams to “make financial ends meet and spend the money you need, it would be nearly impossible to keep up with the Joneses.” The other losers, Mr. Penn said, are the stars. “This is a tough deal for the superstars,” he said. “The years of contract they can sign for goes down, the annual raises go down, maximum salaries over the long term will either level off or go down depending on the salary cap. Once again they won’t be getting their fair share.” Not every star will suffer however. Mr. Penn said that the short-term beneficiaries of the resolution are the Miami Heat, which has three stars—LeBron James, Chris Bosh and Dwyane Wade—in the lineup whose contracts have been set, while the rest of the league enters a frantic free-agency period. “I would say the losers in many ways are the fans because you don’t know what product you’re going to get for a significant amount of money,” said Jeff Van Gundy, an ESPN commentator and former NBA coach who took the New York Knicks to the Finals during the lockout-shortened 1999 season. “If you look at it, the drop in the offensive numbers in 1999 was significant, the efficiency of players was poor,” Mr. Van Gundy said. “You can’t skip steps [like training camp], and what the NBA and its players have agreed to is skipping steps and then saying ‘OK, let’s go play great basketball’—and it doesn’t happen that way and the people that pay the brunt of that are the fans.” Training camps and free agency will launch simultaneously on Dec. 9, NBA Commissioner David Stern said, meaning that some teams will start practice with only a handful of players while trying to recruit others. To add to the unpredictability, the league has yet to unveil its 66-game schedule, which is set to begin Dec. 25. SMH @ the Shady Dream Team coming up roses in this deal while the current free agents have no chance of getting those kinds of sweet deals. More On Bossip! Basketball Wives Breakup Beef: Matt Barnes And Gloria Govan Spend Thanksgiving Eve Throwing Jabs On Twitter Kris Humphries Ex “Bianca” Speaks Out And Says Kris Said Her Cakes Looked Better Than Kim Kardashian… What Do You All Think? [Video/Pics] Bangin’ Baller Babes: The Exes, Girlfriends, Wives, And Beautiful Baby Mamas Of NFL Players Hip-Hop Beef: 50 Cent Responds To T.I. Comments About Him In VIBE Magazine!

Link:
Mo Money: Lockout Puts Plenty Paper In Owners Hands But Leaves Players With Less Than Before!!!

‘Pretty Little Liars’ Actor Diego Boneta Lands Lead In ‘Rock Of Ages’ Movie

Boneta will play Drew in the big-screen adaptation of the Broadway show alongside Tom Cruise. By Jocelyn Vena Diego Gonzalez Boneta Photo: Valerie Macon/ Gettu Images Diego Boneta has gone from living it up on “90210” to guesting on “Pretty Little Liars,” and now the Mexican actor and former star of the telenovela “Rebelde” has landed the much coveted male lead in the big-screen adaptation of “Rock of Ages.” “To be authentic, I like to cast as close to the real age as possible and wanted someone who has all the innocence and guilelessness of Drew,” the movie’s director, Adam Shankman, told The Hollywood Reporter . “And that’s Diego.” Shankman also confirmed the casting on his Twitter account, writing, “He is the perfect movie Drew. He’s going to blow your minds.” Boneta will star as newbie rocker Drew alongside the flick’s leading lady, former “Dancing With the Stars” pro Julianne Hough. The film also stars Tom Cruise as an established rock star who has his sights set on Hough, plus Alec Baldwin and Mary J. Blige, whose character runs the club where Hough’s character works as a stripper. Russell Brand, Paul Giamatti and Amy Adams are also reportedly in negotiations for roles in the film. Last month, Brand revealed to MTV News that there was one big thing holding up the deal. “I think they’re trying to work out what I like to call ‘scheduling,’ ” he joked, alluding to the fact that his salary was still being discussed. The film will begin production on May 19 in Miami, which will double as the story’s Los Angeles setting. “I can’t shut down the Sunset Strip for six weeks, and in Miami we’re turning four blocks basically into a backlot,” Shankman explained. “We’ll digitally add in the hills.”

The rest is here:
‘Pretty Little Liars’ Actor Diego Boneta Lands Lead In ‘Rock Of Ages’ Movie

CBS: The Rich to Blame For Bad Economy, Need to Pay Higher Taxes

On CBS’s Sunday Morning, correspondent Martha Teichner promoted left-wing class warfare talking points from former Clinton Labor Secretary Robert Reich: “[He] in a new book points out another ominous parallel between the Great Depression and the ‘Great Recession,’ its cause.” Reich proclaimed: “More and more of the income that was generated by the economy went to people at the top.” [Audio available here ] Teichner worked to bolster Reich’s argument: “In the last century, there were only two years, in 1928 just before the great crash, and then again in 2007, during which the richest 1% were taking home nearly a quarter of the entire income of the nation.” Reich continued his assault on upper income earners: “Last year, when most Americans were suffering, the top 25 hedge fund managers each earned $1 billion. A billion dollars would pay the salaries of something like 20,000 teachers.” Again, Teichner made sure to back up Reich’s assertions: “That wage inequality, Reich argues, is at the heart of our economic woes. And to fix things, we need to pay those teachers and the rest of the middle class more , not less, so they can spend enough to kick-start the economy. And yes, that means higher taxes for the rich.” For a brief moment, the segment featured the opposing side, in the form of Republican Senate Minority Leader Mitch Mcconnell warning that increasing taxes on the rich could further harm the economy. However, Teichner quickly dismissed such a notion, in favor of liberal economic dogma: “In the partisan battle over the future of the Bush tax cuts, Reich disagrees.” Reich claimed: “We provided a huge tax cut to the rich and nothing trickled down. After 2001, median wages actually dropped.” Teichner tried to suggest that any tax increases would be modest compared with past tax rates: “The top tax rate now is 35%. If the Bush tax cuts are allowed to expire, nearly 40%. For the record, under President Eisenhower, a Republican, the top rate was 91%. Really. Middle class wages were rising and the rich actually got richer.” As NewsBusters’ Brad Wilmouth earlier reported , giving commentary later in the broadcast, Syfy Channel producer Linda McGibney attacked economist and Sunday Morning contributor Ben Stein for opposing a tax increase on the wealthy. In part, she ranted: “I suppose he thinks he’s beyond sharing his good fortune with the rest of Americans who are suffering financially or he just doesn’t care about them. … I have always understood that the have’s are greedy. This is the first time I’ve heard one of them express it out loud so openly.” Here is a transcript of the September 26 exchange between Teichner and Reich: 9:08AM ET ROBERT REICH: Typically in a business cycle, we get back to the same economic path we were on. People get their old jobs back or nearly their old jobs. But this time around, very much like the Great Depression, we are not going to be able to go back on the same road. MARTHA TEICHNER: Former Clinton Labor Secretary Robert Reich in a new book points out another ominous parallel between the Great Depression and the ‘Great Recession,’ its cause. REICH: More and more of the income that was generated by the economy went to people at the top. TEICHNER: In the last century, there were only two years, in 1928 just before the great crash, and then again in 2007, during which the richest 1% were taking home nearly a quarter of the entire income of the nation. REICH: The typical CEO is up to 350 times the salary and benefits of the typical worker. Last year, when most Americans were suffering, the top 25 hedge fund managers each earned $1 billion. A billion dollars would pay the salaries of something like 20,000 teachers. TEICHNER: That wage inequality, Reich argues, is at the heart of our economic woes. And to fix things, we need to pay those teachers and the rest of the middle class more, not less, so they can spend enough to kick-start the economy. And yes, that means higher taxes for the rich. REICH: The economy depends – 70% of demand – on consumers and those consumers are essentially the middle class. People who are very rich, they spend a much smaller proportion of their income. MITCH MCCONNELL [SEN. R-KY]: No recovery will take place if we impose new taxes on the people we need to create jobs. TEICHNER: In the partisan battle over the future of the Bush tax cuts, Reich disagrees. REICH: We provided a huge tax cut to the rich and nothing trickled down. After 2001, median wages actually dropped. TEICHNER: The top tax rate now is 35%. If the Bush tax cuts are allowed to expire, nearly 40%. For the record, under President Eisenhower, a Republican, the top rate was 91%. Really. Middle class wages were rising and the rich actually got richer. REICH: Henry Ford understood this. He paid his workers $5 a day at the Highland Park Model-T plant. That was a lot of money. That was about twice as much as the typical worker was earning. He said, you know, I’m going to make a lot of money because my workers are going to earn enough that they can turn around and buy the Model-Ts that they are making. You know something, Henry Ford was right.

Read the original here:
CBS: The Rich to Blame For Bad Economy, Need to Pay Higher Taxes

Wakefield and Castleford struggle to square circle in golden triangle | Andy Wilson

Wakefield and Castleford – like Featherstone – provide rich talent for rugby league but financial problems could consign them to the Championship. Time to mention the M-word? Since the spring of 1995, it has been probably the most toxic subject in British rugby league, and therefore avoided by anyone with any sense. But harsh financial reality has driven the possibility of a merger between Wakefield Trinity and Castleford Tigers very firmly back on to the agenda. With less than a year before each of the existing 14 Super League clubs will have to submit applications for the next round of licences, the old Yorkshire rivals are in serious trouble. Not so much on the field, where Wakefield in particular continue to punch well above their weight, currently only one place and two points behind Hull KR, who occupy the eighth play-off position. But last Sunday’s home capitulation against Wigan suggested that even the renowned tactical and motivational abilities of John Kear and his coaching team will struggle to come close to a repeat of last year’s remarkable fifth-placed finish. That is not surprising, because for various reasons Kear has lost Danny Brough, Terry Newton, Shane Tronc and Cain Southernwood from the squad with which Trinity started the season, and the club’s tight financial situation has allowed him to sign only comparatively cut-price replacements in Paul Cooke, Danny Kirmond and Charlie Leaeno. Castleford are only two points behind Wakefield after their nervy win against the Catalans Dragons on Tuesday night, but they too are running with a cheaper squad than they had in February, after releasing the expensive but underperforming Australian scrum-half Brent Sherwin several months before the end of his contract. Neither of the clubs can afford to spend close to the £1.65m salary cap that the Super League this week voted to retain for 2011. But an even greater worry for their supporters is the long-running and ongoing uncertainty over their plans to move to new grounds a couple of junctions apart on the M62. The Rugby Football League has already made it pretty clear that without tangible progress on those grounds there will be no new licence from 2012. So officials at both clubs are only too aware that as things stand, they may well be competing for a single Super League place from 2012. But there must also be a chance that neither bid will be accepted, leaving Wakey and Cas with the stark choice of standing alone in the Championship – or coming together to stay in the Super League. Featherstone Rovers, who complete the “golden triangle” of clubs where so many outstanding players have been nurtured over the last century or more, are the interested third party, just as they were when the merger was first mooted – with a hamfisted attempt to impose it from above as part of the original Super League plans. They are currently sitting pretty, six points clear at the top of the Championship table, and enjoying their best season since 1998 under the former Leeds coach Daryl Powell. They also have arguably the best ground of the three, with realistic-sounding plans to develop it further rather than moving to a new site, and Rovers would have every right to some smug satisfaction were they to be awarded a licence from 2012 ahead of Wakefield and Cas, after missing out on the original Super League cut in 1996 merely because they happened to have had a bad season at exactly the wrong time. But there is no guarantee of that happening, either – and even if it did, it is hard to see Featherstone being any stronger in the Super League than Castleford and Wakefield are currently. As in 1996, there are powerful, logical reasons for the three rivals to come together and form a club that could challenge for honours on a regular basis, rather than scramble to survive. It is the bigger clubs, and especially Leeds, who benefit most from the current situation, as it allows them to pick off the best players from arguably the game’s most fertile nursery – either as youngsters, as in the case of Rob Burrow who played his junior rugby with Featherstone Lions, or when they have established themselves, as Gareth Ellis had with Wakefield before joining the Rhinos. Already this season Wakefield have lost Brough to Huddersfield and Southernwood to Bradford, and Castleford are as powerless to prevent Michael Shenton leaving for St Helens at the end of his contract as Featherstone were when another England centre, Paul Newlove, moved to Bradford and then Saints in the mid-1990s. Despite the levelling effect of the salary cap, which brings such sides as Leeds, Wigan, Saints, Hull and Warrington within more realistic reach of smaller clubs, it is now more than 16 years since any of the three in question won a major trophy – and even Castleford’s memorable triumph over Wigan in the 1994 Regal Trophy final is slightly soured by the knowledge that building the team to win it left the club with horrendous financial problems. But rugby league is a passionate game where supporters’ commitment to their local clubs has tended to outweigh cold, hard logic – and there’s nothing necessarily wrong in that. It is for those supporters – including the wealthier ones who keep the clubs afloat – to decide what happens next and nobody has yet been brave enough even to suggest publicly the idea of a merger. Instead Wakefield and Cas continue on their frantic scramble to start work on their new grounds by this time next year, while battling equally desperately to remain competitive on the field – and on this season’s evidence, an increasing proportion of those supporters choose to stay away. I’m not daft enough to advocate a merger. It’s not my place to do so. The sole purpose of this column is to note the real danger that Wakefield, Castleford and Featherstone will all be playing in the Championship from 2012, and that the area’s young players will no longer have even a struggling Super League option. Given that background, do not be surprised if someone finally sticks their head above the parapet, and asks the game’s most difficult question. Thoughts on the above welcome as always, from inside or outside the golden triangle, and also your answers to a hypothetical question that sprung to mind watching Queensland’s crushing victory in the second State of Origin match from Brisbane this week: how would England do against New South Wales? Wakefield Trinity Castleford Super League Rugby league Andy Wilson guardian.co.uk

Read the original post:
Wakefield and Castleford struggle to square circle in golden triangle | Andy Wilson

Charlie Sheen Is Back To Two and a Half Men

Charlie Harper is now returning to Two and a Half Men. The actor has agreed to return to the sitcom for two more years after publicly considering leaving the show. Sheen said in a statement “To put a fitting end on the two and one-half months of whirlwind speculation, I’m looking forward to returning to my CBS home on Monday nights.” His contract has expired last month and he also recently denied the reports regarding his salary negotiations for a new contract. Many viewers are expecting the CBS to officially announce Sheen and the show’s return just before unveiling its fall lineup to the advertisers t his Wednesday. Charlie Sheen Is Back To Two and a Half Men is a post from: Daily World Buzz Continue reading

Ronnie James Dio Died From Gastric Cancer

Lead vocals of Dio band Ronnie James Dio, an American songwriter, died last Sunday after his battle against gastric cancer. According to his wife and manager Wendy Dio, the singer died at 7:45 in the morning. “Today my heart is broken,” Wendy Dio wrote on the singer’s site . “Many, many friends and family were able to say their private goodbyes before he peacefully passed away. “Ronnie knew how much he was loved by all,” she continued. “We so appreciate the love and support that you have all given us … Please know he loved you all and his music will live on forever.” The statement was confirmed by publicist Maureen O’Connor, who said Dio died in Los Angeles. He had been treated at a Houston hospital. Dio revealed last summer that he was suffering from stomach cancer shortly after wrapping up a tour in Atlantic City, N.J., with the latest incarnation of Black Sabbath, under the name Heaven And Hell. Ronnie James Dio Died From Gastric Cancer is a post from: Daily World Buzz Continue reading

Catherine Hardwicke Expressed Her Feelings Over Lutz and Greene’s Salary Dispute

Director of the first Twilight film Catherine Hardwicke, an American production designer and film director, expressed her feelings towards the current salary dispute that involves Ashley Greene who plays “Alice Cullen” and Kellan Lutz who plays “Emmett Cullen” in the movie series Twilight. “It would really break my heart if they were replaced, but it could happen. Things could turn ugly quickly,” Hardwicke said this weekend at the Twilight Convention in Vancouver, Canada. Lutz and Greene reportedly had a three-picture deal, which already expired. They are trying to score paydays of about $1.5 million as work begins on the fourth movie installment “Breaking Dawn”. Hardwicke says the young actors might not even be all that involved in the negotiations. “They have all these people and outside influences telling you what to do,” Hardwicke said. “They tell you to hold out for this much because you’re such an important part of the franchise, and everyone is telling you to ask for more.” But it’s a dangerous game, she adds – pointing to the case of Rachelle Lefevre, who was replaced by Bryce Dallas Howard for Eclipse. “A lot of stuff can get mishandled and misunderstood,” she said. “That is what happened with Rachelle Lafevre.” Do they actually deserve more money? Hard to say. “Probably they do deserve more money, on one level,” Hardwicke says. “But if everybody makes so much money then … [shrugs]. It is very complicated. Oh my, it is such a mess. I really hope they can sort it out because it would be a shame to lose any actors.” Catherine Hardwicke Expressed Her Feelings Over Lutz and Greene’s Salary Dispute is a post from: Daily World Buzz Continue reading

Jay-Z Talks LeBron James, Cavaliers’ Loss

‘LeBron and the Cavs knew this was going to be a war and a tough series,’ Jay says of the Boston Celtics’ upset. By James Montgomery Jay-Z and LeBron James Photo: MTV News The morning after LeBron James’ Cleveland Cavaliers were bounced from the NBA Playoffs — an exit that very well may have also punched the superstar’s ticket out of Cleveland, since he can opt out of his contract June 30 — Jay-Z, one of his closest friends (and part owner of the New Jersey Nets ), phoned in to Stephen A. Smith’s Fox Sports Radio program to weigh in on the situation. While Jay didn’t say where he thinks James will end up next season (though, thanks to his friendship with the King, and the salary-cap room the Nets have to work with, New Jersey seems to be a logical fit), he did give his take on the Cavs’ elimination at the hands of the Boston Celtics — which he didn’t find all that shocking, to be honest. “The first thing I would say is, never really underestimate the heart of a champion,” Jay told Smith. “Like, Boston just won a championship two years ago, and it was a great story for everyone to dismiss them and just say, ‘This is going to be an easy series.’ I think LeBron and the Cavs — because they’re basketball players, they’re not into media sensation — they knew this was going to be a war and a tough series. “I think Boston got healthy at the right time, and I think the fact that a lot of them were out a lot of the year, it kind of worked in their favor, because a lot of them are rested,” Jay continued. “They’re rested and they’re healthy at the right time, and this is a champion just two years ago. … So this is not like a 16 seed; this is a real team. And [Celtics point guard Rajon] Rondo is playing like [onetime Celtics star] Nate Archibald or somebody, man. Who is this guy?” Smith also grilled Jay on his relationship with new Nets owner Mikhail Prokhorov, an eccentric Russian billionaire who bought controlling interest of the team late last year (a deal that was approved by the NBA earlier this week). Jay said that he’s already met with Prokhorov and that he plans to play an “active” role in the rebuilding of the franchise. “I sat down with him, and we had a fantastic conversation, and there were things that I really wanted to make clear: that I wanted to be an active owner and this is something I really care about. It’s not just a name cachet for me,” Jay said. “It’s just a thing that I love. I love sports. Everybody was happy about what I was saying, so it looks like I’ll be taking a more active role in what’s going on. … Should be fun.” Do you think Jay-Z should lure LeBron to the Nets? Let us know in the comments! Related Artists Jay-Z

More:
Jay-Z Talks LeBron James, Cavaliers’ Loss